Focal and Linear Endocardial and Epicardial Catheter-Based Cryoablation of Normal and Infarcted Ventricular Tissue

Epicardial Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: Patient Selection, Access, and Ablation Techniques and Strategies to Manage Complications

Epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation is an important treatment modality for refractory ventricular tachycardia. This comprehensive review guides clinicians through optimized strategies for improved procedural outcomes and patient safety during epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation. Patient selection criteria, including cardiomyopathy type, electrocardiogram findings, and prior ablation history, are discussed. Detailed techniques for safe pericardial access are provided. Potential complications and strategies for prevention and management are explored. The review also addresses challenges and pitfalls of epicardial mapping and ablation.

Cryothermal energy demonstrates shorter ablation time and lower complication rates compared with radiofrequency in surgical hybrid ablation for recurrent ventricular tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) after prior endocardial catheter ablation(s) presents challenges in the setting of prior cardiac surgery where percutaneous epicardial access may not be feasible.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of cryothermal vs radiofrequency ablation in direct surgical epicardial access procedures.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of consecutive surgical epicardial VT ablation cases. Surgical cases using cryothermal vs radiofrequency ablation were analyzed and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Between 2009 and 2022, 43 patients underwent either a cryothermal (n = 17) or a radiofrequency (n = 26) hybrid epicardial ablation procedure with direct surgical access. Both groups were similarly matched for age, sex, etiology of VT, and comorbidities with a high burden of refractory VT despite previous endocardial and/or percutaneous epicardial ablation procedures. The surgical access site was lateral thoracotomy (76.5%) in the cryothermal ablation group compared with lateral thoracotomy (42.3%) and subxiphoid approach (38.5%) in the radiofrequency group, with the remainder in both groups performed via median sternotomy. The ablation time was significantly shorter in those undergoing cryothermal ablation vs radiofrequency ablation (11.54 ± 15.5 minutes vs 48.48 ± 23.6 minutes; P < .001). There were no complications in the cryothermal ablation group compared with 6 patients with complications in the radiofrequency group. Recurrent VT episodes and all-cause mortality were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid surgical VT ablation with cryothermal or radiofrequency energy demonstrated similar efficacy outcomes. Cryothermal ablation was more efficient and safer than radiofrequency in a surgical setting and should be considered when surgical access is required.

Linear epicardial cryoablation effects in a porcine model: Lesion characteristics and vascular risk

INTRODUCTION

Cryoablation in open-chest surgical interventions for ventricular arrhythmias has been reported with reasonable procedural outcomes. However, the characteristics of cryoablation lesions on the ventricular myocardium are not well defined. The purpose of the present study was to determine the tissue and vascular effects of a linear epicardial cryoablation probe in a porcine animal model.

METHODS

Five adult Yorkshire swine underwent median sternotomy and application of linear cryoablation lesions using a malleable aluminum linear cryoablation probe of varying duration (2, 3, 4, and 5 min), including one lesion placed intentionally over the left anterior descending coronary (LAD) artery. Histological analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Maximum lesion depth was approximately 1.0 cm with 3 min freezes, with no significant increase in depth achieved with longer lesions. No transmural lesions were achieved. No large vessel epicardial coronary artery injuries were seen to the LAD; however, surprisingly, remote isolated interventricular septal injury was seen in all animals, suggestive of possible compromise of smaller coronary arterial vessels.

CONCLUSION

Single application freezes with an aluminum linear cryoablation probe can create homogeneous ablative lesions over the ventricular myocardium with a maximum depth of approximately 1.0 cm. No large vessel injury occurred with direct lesion application of the LAD; however, small coronary vessels may be at risk.

Hybrid surgical epicardial cryoablation for ventricular tachycardia in the electrophysiology laboratory: a case report

Background

Scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a challenging medical condition, with catheter ablation providing a valuable treatment option. Whilst most VTs can be ablated endocardially, epicardial ablation is often required in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. The percutaneous subxiphoid technique has become instrumental for epicardial access. However, it is not feasible in up to 28% of cases for multiple reasons.

Case summary

A 47-year-old patient was managed at our centre for VT storm and recurrent implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks for monomorphic VT despite maximum drug therapy. No scar was noted during endocardial mapping, with confirmation of the localized epicardial scar on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Following failed percutaneous epicardial access, a successful hybrid surgical epicardial VT cryoablation via median sternotomy was performed in the electrophysiology (EP) laboratory utilizing data from CMR, prior endocardial ablation, and conventional EP mapping. The patient has remained arrhythmia-free for 30 months post-ablation without antiarrhythmic therapy.

Discussion

This case describes a practical multidisciplinary approach to managing a challenging clinical problem. Whilst the described technique is not entirely novel, this is the first case report that describes the practicalities and demonstrates the safety and feasibility of hybrid epicardial cryoablation via median sternotomy performed in the cardiac EP laboratory for the sole treatment of VT.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Epicardial Ablation Biophysics and Novel Radiofrequency Energy Delivery Techniques

Important physiologic and anatomic differences exist between the epicardium and endocardium, particularly of the ventricles, and these differences affect ablation biophysics. Absence of passive convective effects conferred by circulating blood as well as the presence of epicardial fat and vessels and absence of intracavitary ridges and structures affect ablation lesion size when performing epicardial catheter-based ablation, whether using radiofrequency or cryothermal energy. Understanding differential effects in each environment is important in informing strategies to increase ablation lesion depth. When using actively cooled radiofrequency ablation, local impedance can be altered to selectively augment energy delivery.

Patient Selection for Epicardial Ablation-Part II: The Epicardial Approach and Current Challenges Associated with Epicardial Ablation

Since their inception, percutaneous epicardial approaches have become increasingly common in clinical practice with the advent of new technology and the growth of catheter ablation for both ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias. In addition to identifying the arrhythmogenic foci, there remain challenges to successful epicardial ablation such as the choice of energy source, optimizing irrigation during ablation, and anatomic barriers such as epicardial fat and coronary vessels. The performance of continued translational studies to understand how each of these factors contribute to lesion formation will be essential to guide future advances in the field of epicardial ablation.

Irrigated Microwave Catheter Ablation Can Create Deep Ventricular Lesions Through Epicardial Fat With Relative Sparing of Adjacent Coronary Arteries

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation depth can be inadequate to reach intramural or epicardial substrate, and energy delivery in the pericardium is limited by penetration through epicardial fat and coronary anatomy. We hypothesized that open irrigated microwave catheter ablation can create deep myocardial lesions endocardially and epicardially though fat while acutely sparing nearby the coronary arteries.

METHODS

In-house designed and constructed irrigated microwave catheters were tested in in vitro phantom models and in 15 sheep. Endocardial ablations were performed at 140 to 180 W for 4 minutes; epicardial ablations via subxiphoid access were performed at 90 to 100 W for 4 minutes at sites near coronary arteries.

RESULTS

Epicardial ablations at 90 to 100 W produced mean lesion depth of 10±4 mm, width 18±10 mm, and length 29±8 mm through median epicardial fat thickness of 1.2 mm. Endocardial ablations at 180 W reached depths of 10.7±3.3 mm, width of 16.6±5 mm, and length of 20±5 mm. Acute coronary occlusion or spasm was not observed at a median separation distance of 2.7 mm (IQR, 1.2-3.4 mm). Saline electrodes recorded unipolar and bipolar electrograms; microwave ablation caused reductions in voltage and changes in electrogram morphology with loss of pace-capture. In vitro models demonstrated the heat sink effect of coronary flow, as well as preferential microwave coupling to myocardium and blood as opposed to lung and epicardial fat phantoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Irrigated microwave catheter ablation may be an effective ablation modality for deep ventricular lesion creation with capacity for fat penetration and sparing of nearby coronary arteries because of cooling endoluminal flow. Clinical translation could improve the treatment of ventricular tachycardia arising from mid myocardial or epicardial substrates.

Percutaneous Epicardial Approach to Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias

Since their introduction >2 decades ago, percutaneous catheter-based epicardial mapping and ablation have become widely adopted by cardiac electrophysiologists around the world. Although epicardial mapping has been used for catheter ablation of a wide variety of cardiac arrhythmias, its most common use is for ablation of intramural and subepicardial substrates that give rise to ventricular tachycardia, particularly in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. As such, the subxiphoid percutaneous epicardial approach has emerged as an important adjunct, and, in some cases, is the preferred strategy in this regard. This review discusses the rationale and indications for epicardial catheter mapping and/or ablation. This paper also reviews the prevalence of epicardial arrhythmias and their electrocardiographic criteria. In addition, it examines the anatomy of the pericardium and commonly used epicardial access techniques, as well as the optimal methodologies for epicardial mapping and ablation and the impact of epicardial fat. Finally, this review discusses the potential of the various complications associated with the percutaneous epicardial approach, in addition to patient-specific risk factors, and potential strategies to mitigate the risk of complications.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Epicardial Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia: a Review

For over 3 decades, it has been known that reentry circuits for ventricular tachycardia (VT) are not limited to the subendocardial myocardium. Rather, intramural or subepicardial substrates may also give rise to VT, particularly in those with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Percutaneous epicardial mapping and ablation has been successfully introduced for the treatment of such subepicardial VT. Herein, we review the indications for epicardial ablation and the identification of epicardial VT by electrocardiographic and imaging modalities. We also discuss the optimal technique for epicardial access and the implications of epicardial fat which has the potential to mimic scar, decreasing the specificity of electrogram morphology and impeding energy delivery to the tissue. Finally, we also report on possible complications of the procedure and strategies to mitigate adverse events.

Epicardial Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia

Over the last two decades, epicardial catheter ablation has evolved into a practical approach for treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). There are certain considerations when performing this procedure. First, presence of epicardial fat can diminish peak-to-peak electrogram amplitude and also impede radiofrequency energy delivery. Hence, epicardial VT ablation should be performed with cooled-tip radiofrequency using reduced irrigation flow within a relatively 'dry' pericardial milieu. Furthermore, catheter orientation is key when performing epicardial ablation. Lastly, hemo-pericardium remains the most common major adverse event of epicardial ablation and its presenting timeline may be used to identify the precise nature of this complication.

Recognition and Prevention of Complications During Epicardial Ablation

Although the transthoracic epicardial mapping and ablation technique is a relatively safe procedure, complications can and do occur. The possible complications associated with this technique should be well understood before the procedure. If these complications are recognized early and managed appropriately, the outcome is usually excellent. This review describes the details of how to recognize, prevent, and manage the complications that occur during pericardial access, mapping and ablation, and post procedure.

Epicardial Ablation of Supraventricular Tachycardia

Epicardial catheter-based mapping and ablation of a variety of supraventricular tachycardias is feasible, safe, and effective. Supraventricular tachycardia substrates are not uncommonly epicardial, and approaches with percutaneous epicardial instrumentation or via the epicardial venous structures, such as the coronary sinus, are becoming more widely accepted. These techniques are an important treatment option as an alternative to a more invasive surgical approach or to allowing patients to suffer from an ongoing arrhythmia. New technologies and innovative techniques are being developed that hold great potential to improve the efficacy and safety of the epicardial catheter-based approach to these challenging arrhythmias.