Narrow, Slow-Conducting Isthmus Dependent Left Atrial Reentry Developing After Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: ECG Characterization and Elimination by Focal RF Ablation

Atypical Atrial Flutter: Electrophysiological Characterization and Effective Catheter Ablation

Atrial flutter (AFL), defined as macro-re-entrant atrial tachycardia, is associated with debilitating symptoms, stroke, heart failure, and increased mortality. AFL is classified into typical, or cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent, and atypical, or non-CTI-dependent. Atypical AFL is a heterogenous group of re-entrant atrial tachycardias that most commonly occur in patients with prior heart surgery or catheter ablation. The ECG pattern is poorly predictive of circuit anatomy but may still provide mechanistic insight. AFL is difficult to manage medically and catheter ablation is the preferred treatment for most patients. Recent progress in technology and clinical electrophysiology has led to detailed characterization of re-entry circuits and effective ablation strategies. Combined activation and entrainment mapping are key to identifying the re-entry circuit. The presence of a slow-conducting isthmus, localized re-entry, dual-loop re-entry or bystander loops may lead to misleading activation maps but can be identified by electrogram examination and entrainment mapping. In the occasional patient without inducible AFL, substrate mapping in sinus rhythm may be a viable strategy. Long-term ablation success requires the creation of a transmural continuous lesion across a critical component of the re-entry circuit. Procedural endpoints include bidirectional conduction block across linear lesions and non-inducibility of atrial tachycardia. The present review discusses the epidemiology, mechanisms, ECG characteristics, electrophysiological characterization, and catheter ablation of atypical AFL.

Peak frequency mapping of atypical atrial flutter

INTRODUCTION

Peak frequency (PF) mapping is a novel method that may identify critical portions of myocardial substrate supporting reentry. The aim of this study was to describe and evaluate PF mapping combined with omnipolar voltage mapping in the identification of critical isthmuses of left atrial (LA) atypical flutters.

METHODS AND RESULTS

LA omnipolar voltage and PF maps were generated in flutter using the Advisor HD-Grid catheter (Abbott) and EnSite Precision Mapping System (Abbott) in 12 patients. Normal voltage was defined as ≥0.5 mV, low-voltage as 0.1-0.5 mV, and scar as <0.1 mV. PF distributions were compared with ANOVA and post hoc Tukey analyses. The 1 cm radius from arrhythmia termination was compared to global myocardium with unpaired t-testing. The mean age was 65.8 ± 9.7 years and 50% of patients were female. Overall, 34 312 points were analyzed. Atypical flutters most frequently involved the mitral isthmus (58%) or anterior wall (25%). Mean PF varied significantly by myocardial voltage: normal (335.5 ± 115.0 Hz), low (274.6 ± 144.0 Hz), and scar (71.6 ± 140.5 Hz) (p < .0001 for all pairwise comparisons). All termination sites resided in low-voltage regions containing intermediate or high PF. Overall, mean voltage in the 1 cm radius from termination was significantly lower than the remaining myocardium (0.58 vs. 0.95 mV, p < .0001) and PF was significantly higher (326.4 vs. 245.1 Hz, p < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Low-voltage, high-PF areas may be critical targets during catheter ablation of atypical atrial flutter.

Localized Re-Entry Is a Frequent Mechanism of De Novo Atypical Flutter

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist about the origins and mechanisms of atypical atrial flutter that occurs in the absence of prior ablation or surgery.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to report a large cohort of patients who presented for catheter ablation of de novo atypical flutters, to identify the most common locations and mechanisms of arrhythmia, and to describe outcomes after ablation.

METHODS

Demographic, electrophysiological, and outcome data were collected for patients who underwent ablation of de novo atypical flutter.

RESULTS

The mechanisms of 85 atypical flutters were identified in 62 patients and localized to the left atrium (LA) in 58 and right atrium (RA) in 27. In the LA, mechanisms were classified as macro-re-entry in 29 (50%) and localized re-entry in 29 (50%), whereas in the RA, mechanisms were macro-re-entry in 8 (30%) and localized re-entry in 19 (70%) (proportion of localized re-entry in the LA vs. RA, P = 0.08). Nine patients had both localized and macro-re-entrant atypical flutters. In the LA, localized re-entry was commonly found in the anterior LA, followed by the pulmonary veins and septum. In the RA, localized re-entry was found at various sites, including the lateral or posterior RA, septum, and coronary sinus ostium. During 39.4 months (Q1-Q3: 18.2-65.8 months) of follow-up, atrial arrhythmias occurred in 66% of patients after a single ablation and in 50% after >1 ablation. Among patients who underwent repeat ablation, compared with the index arrhythmia, different tachycardia circuits or arrhythmias were documented in 13 of 18 cases (72%).

CONCLUSIONS

Atypical atrial flutters in patients without prior surgery or complex ablation are often due to localized re-entry (approximately 50% in the LA and a higher frequency in the RA). Other atrial tachycardias commonly occur during long-term follow-up following ablation, suggesting progressive atrial myopathy in these patients.

Electrophysiologic Determinants of Isoelectric Intervals on Surface Electrocardiograms During Atrial Tachycardia: Insights From High-Density Mapping

BACKGROUND

Substrate abnormalities can alter atrial activation during atrial tachycardias (ATs) thereby influencing AT-wave morphology on the surface electrocardiogram.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to identify determinants of isoelectric intervals during ATs with complex atrial activation patterns.

METHODS

High-density activation maps of 126 ATs were studied. To assess the impact of the activated atrial surface on the presence of isoelectric intervals, this study measured the minimum activated area throughout the AT cycle, defined as the smallest activated area within a 50-millisecond period, by using signal processing algorithms (LUMIPOINT).

RESULTS

ATs with isoelectric intervals (P-wave ATs) included 23 macro-re-entrant ATs (40%), 26 localized-re-entrant ATs (46%), and 8 focal ATs (14%), whereas those without included 46 macro-re-entrant ATs (67%), 21 localized-re-entrant ATs (30%), and 2 focal ATs (3%). Multivariable regression identified smaller minimum activated area and larger very low voltage area as independent predictors of P-wave ATs (OR: 0.732; 95% CI: 0.644-0.831; P < 0.001; and OR: 1.042; 95% CI: 1.006-1.080; P = 0.023, respectively). The minimum activated area with the cutoff value of 10 cm2 provided the highest predictive accuracy for P-wave ATs with sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 96%, 97%, 97%, and 95%, respectively. In re-entrant ATs, smaller minimum activated area was associated with lower minimum conduction velocity within the circuit and fewer areas of delayed conduction outside of the circuit (standardized β: 0.524; 95% CI: 0.373-0.675; P < 0.001; and standardized β: 0.353; 95% CI: 0.198-0.508; P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced atrial activation area and voltage were associated with isoelectric intervals during ATs.

Interpretation of Typical and Atypical Atrial Flutters by Precision Electrocardiology Based on Intracardiac Recording

Atrial flutter is a term encompassing multiple clinical entities. Clinical manifestations of these arrhythmias range from typical isthmus-dependent flutter to post-ablation microreentries. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is a diagnostic tool in typical flutter, but it is often unable to clearly localize atrial flutters maintained by more complex reentrant circuits. Electrophysiology study and mapping are able to characterize in fine details all the components of the circuit and determine their electrophysiological properties. Combining these 2 techniques can greatly help in understanding the vectors determining the ECG morphology of the flutter waveforms, increasing the diagnostic usefulness of this tool.

Wide area circumferential ablation for pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency versus laser balloon ablation

Background

Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with high recurrence rates of AF and atypical atrial flutters or tachycardia (AFT) postablation. Laser balloon (LB) ablation of the pulmonary vein (PV) ostia has similar efficacy as radiofrequency wide area circumferential ablation (RF-WACA); however, an approach of LB wide area circumferential ablation (LB-WACA) may further improve success rates.

Objective

To evaluate freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (AFT/AF) recurrence postablation using RF-WACA versus LB-WACA in persistent AF patients.

Methods

This was a retrospective multicenter study. Patients were followed for up to 24 months via office visits, Holter, and/or device monitoring. The primary endpoint was freedom from AFT/AF after a single ablation procedure. Secondary endpoints included freedom from AF, freedom from AFT, first-pass isolation of all PVs, and procedural complications.

Results

Two hundred and four patients were studied (LB-WACA: n = 103; RF-WACA: n = 101). Patients' baseline characteristics were similar except patients in the RF-WACA group were older (64 vs. 68, p = .03). First-pass isolation was achieved more often during LBA (LB-WACA: 88% vs. RF-WACA 75%; p = .04). Procedure (p = .36), LA dwell (p = .41), and fluoroscopy (p = .44) time were similar. The mean follow-up was 506 ± 279 days. Sixty-six patients had arrhythmic events including 24 AFT and 59 AF recurrences. LB-WACA group had higher arrhythmia-free survival (p = .009) after single ablation procedures. In the multivariate Cox regression model, RF-WACA was associated with a higher recurrence of AFT compared with LB-WACA (Adjusted HR 3.16 [95% CI: 1.13-8.83]; p = .03).

Conclusions

LB-WACA was associated with higher freedom from atrial arrhythmias mostly driven by the lower occurrence of AFT compared with RF-WACA.

Cardioversion of Post-Ablation Atrial Tachyarrhythmia with Ibutilide and Amiodarone: A Registry-Based Cohort Study

Patients with recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter constitute a rapidly growing cohort, but study-driven treatment recommendations are lacking. The present study aimed to compare the cardioversion success of ibutilide and amiodarone in patients with post-ablation atrial tachyarrhythmia. We included all episodes of post-ablation atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients treated with either intravenous ibutilide or amiodarone at an academic emergency department from 2010 to 2018. The primary endpoint was the conversion to sinus rhythm. The conversion rates were stratified by arrhythmia type, and multivariable cluster-adjusted logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of ibutilide and amiodarone on cardioversion success, given as the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). In total, 109 episodes of 72 patients were analyzed. The conversion rates were 37/49 (76%) for ibutilide and 16/60 (27%) for amiodarone. Compared to amiodarone, ibutilide was associated with higher odds of conversion (multivariable cluster-adjusted OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.3–24.3). The cardioversion success of ibutilide was the highest in atrial flutter (crude OR 19.5, 95% CI 3.4–112.5) and focal atrial tachycardia (crude OR 8.3, 95% CI 1.5–47.2), but it was less pronounced in atrial fibrillation (crude OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.2–17.2). Randomized trials are warranted to confirm our findings.

Significance of post-pacing intervals shorter than tachycardia cycle length for successful catheter ablation of atypical flutter

AIMS

During entrainment mapping of macro-reentrant tachycardias, the time difference (dPPI) between post-pacing interval (PPI) and tachycardia cycle length (TCL) is thought to be a function of the distance of the pacing site to the re-entry circuit and dPPI < 30 ms is considered within the re-entry circuit. This study assessed the importance of PPI < TCL as a successful target for atypical flutter ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 177 ablation procedures were investigated. Surface electrocardiograms (ECGs) were evaluated and combined activation and entrainment mapping were performed to choose ablation sites. Each entrainment sequence immediately preceding static radiofrequency delivery at the same site was analysed. A total of 545 entrainment sequences were analysed. dPPI < 0 ms was observed in 45.3% (247/545) sequences. Ablation resulted in tachycardia termination more often at sites with dPPI < 0 (27.8% vs. 14.5%, P < 0.001) and with a progressively increasingly inverse correlation between dPPI duration and ablation success [odds ratio (OR): 0.974; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.960-0.988; P < 0.001]. Tachycardia termination or cycle length prolongation also occurred more often at sites with dPPI < 0 (50.6% vs. 33.2%, P < 0.001) and with a similar inverse correlation with dPPI duration (OR: 0.972; 95% CI 0.960-0.984; P < 0.001). Twelve-lead synchronous isoelectric intervals were observed in 64.4% (163/253) flutter ECGs and were associated with a dPPI < 0 (75.3% vs. 55.8%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

When combined with activation mapping, a negative dPPI is a more effective parameter for identifying a target for successful ablation compared to a dPPI = 0-30 ms. Its occurrence is associated with a critical small narrow slow-conducting isthmus at the target site.

Atriale Tachykardien nach Vorhofflimmerablation: Fluch oder Segen?

Nach Vorhofflimmerablation kann es neben Vorhofflimmerrezidiven auch zum Auftreten von verschiedenen atrialen Tachykardien kommen. Obwohl bei atrialen Tachykardien eine regelmäßige atriale Aktivierung vorliegt, sind diese Rhythmusstörungen für die Patienten häufig stark symptomatisch und teils kaum medikamentös zu kontrollieren. Für eine individualisierte Therapieplanung können anhand des Oberflächen-EKGs auch bei vielen vor-abladierten Patienten rechts- von links-atrialen Tachykardien recht zuverlässig unterschieden werden. Die Ablationsstrategie richtet sich nach dem Mechanismus der Tachykardie: Auffinden der frühesten elektrischen Aktivierung und lokale Ablation bei fokalen Tachykardien oder lineare Ablation zur Unterbindung des Reentry-Kreislaufs bei Makro-Reentry-Tachykardien. Speziell bei Patienten mit ausgeprägter Vorhoffibrose ist der optimale Therapieansatz aber noch Gegenstand klinischer Studien.

Catheter ablation for atrial tachycardias: How to interpret the unclear activation map?

BACKGROUND

Post-ablation atrial tachycardias (ATs) are characterized by low-voltage signals that challenge current mapping methods. In this study, we analyzed common mistakes during activation mapping and delineated a mapping strategy for correct interpretation of tachycardia mechanisms in patients with challenging underlying substrate.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-one patients referred for AT ablation were selected for the study. Three types of incorrect activation patterns were identified, which were referred to as unrecognized block line (pseudo-macroreentry and pseudo-fig-8 reentry), incorrect activation timing window of interest (WOI) (chaotic activation), and mis-annotation of complex signals (multiple sites of "early meets late"). Pseudo-macroreentry and chaotic activation occur in focal or localized reentry AT with the error related to the WOI selection (four cases), incorrect annotation of local activation time (six cases), or a previous line of atrial block in (seven cases). Pseudo-fig-8 reentry (five cases) and multiple sites of "early meets late" (nine cases) occur in macroreentrant AT with blocked areas and low-voltage atrial substrate. All ATs were successfully eliminated at the origin site.

CONCLUSIONS

We delineated a series of ATs in the setting of a disordered pattern of activation mapping encountered in patients after previous extensive ablation or atriotomy. The algorithm proposed rapidly corrects the activation map and identifies the mechanism of the AT.

Pulmonary vein-gap re-entrant atrial tachycardia following atrial fibrillation ablation: an electrophysiological insight with high-resolution mapping

Aims

The circuit of pulmonary vein-gap re-entrant atrial tachycardia (PV-gap RAT) after atrial fibrillation ablation is sometimes difficult to identify by conventional mapping. We analysed the detailed circuit and electrophysiological features of PV-gap RATs using a novel high-resolution mapping system.

Methods and results

This multicentre study investigated 27 (7%) PV-gap RATs in 26 patients among 378 atrial tachycardias (ATs) mapped with Rhythmia™ system in 281 patients. The tachycardia cycle length (TCL) was 258 ± 52 ms with P-wave duration of 116 ± 28 ms. Three types of PV-gap RAT circuits were identified: (A) two gaps in one pulmonary vein (PV) (unilateral circuit) (n = 17); (B) two gaps in the ipsilateral superior and inferior PVs (unilateral circuit) (n = 6); and (C) two gaps in one PV with a large circuit around contralateral PVs (bilateral circuit) (n = 4). Rhythmia™ mapping demonstrated two distinctive entrance and exit gaps of 7.6 ± 2.5 and 7.9 ± 4.1 mm in width, respectively, the local signals of which showed slow conduction (0.14 ± 0.18 and 0.11 ± 0.10m/s) with fragmentation (duration 86 ± 27 and 78 ± 23 ms) and low-voltage (0.17 ± 0.13 and 0.17 ± 0.21 mV). Twenty-two ATs were terminated (mechanical bump in one) and five were changed by the first radiofrequency application at the entrance or exit gap. Moreover, the conduction time inside the PVs (entrance-to-exit) was 138 ± 60 ms (54 ± 22% of TCL); in all cases, this resulted in demonstrating P-wave with an isoelectric line in all leads.

Conclusion

This is the first report to demonstrate the detailed mechanisms of PV-gap re-entry that showed evident entrance and exit gaps using a high-resolution mapping system. The circuits were variable and Rhythmia™-guided ablation targeting the PV-gap can be curative.

Isthmus sites identified by Ripple Mapping are usually anatomically stable: A novel method to guide atrial substrate ablation?

BACKGROUND

Postablation reentrant ATs depend upon conducting isthmuses bordered by scar. Bipolar voltage maps highlight scar as sites of low voltage, but the voltage amplitude of an electrogram depends upon the myocardial activation sequence. Furthermore, a voltage threshold that defines atrial scar is unknown. We used Ripple Mapping (RM) to test whether these isthmuses were anatomically fixed between different activation vectors and atrial rates.

METHODS

We studied post-AF ablation ATs where >1 rhythm was mapped. Multipolar catheters were used with CARTO Confidense for high-density mapping. RM visualized the pattern of activation, and the voltage threshold below which no activation was seen. Isthmuses were characterized at this threshold between maps for each patient.

RESULTS

Ten patients were studied (Map 1 was AT1; Map 2: sinus 1/10, LA paced 2/10, AT2 with reverse CS activation 3/10; AT2 CL difference 50 ± 30 ms). Point density was similar between maps (Map 1: 2,589 ± 1,330; Map 2: 2,214 ± 1,384; P  =  0.31). RM activation threshold was 0.16 ± 0.08 mV. Thirty-one isthmuses were identified in Map 1 (median 3 per map; width 27 ± 15 mm; 7 anterior; 6 roof; 8 mitral; 9 septal; 1 posterior). Importantly, 7 of 31 (23%) isthmuses were unexpectedly identified within regions without prior ablation. AT1 was treated following ablation of 11/31 (35%) isthmuses. Of the remaining 20 isthmuses, 14 of 16 isthmuses (88%) were consistent between the two maps (four were inadequately mapped). Wavefront collision caused variation in low voltage distribution in 2 of 16 (12%).

CONCLUSIONS

The distribution of isthmuses and nonconducting tissue within the ablated left atrium, as defined by RM, appear concordant between rhythms. This could guide a substrate ablative approach.

Useful Electrocardiographic Features to Help Identify the Mechanism of Atrial Tachycardia Occurring After Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to describe and identify useful electrocardiographic characteristics to help identify the mechanism of atrial tachycardia (AT) occurring after persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) ablation.

BACKGROUND

Electrocardiographic analysis to help identify the mechanism of AT after PsAF ablation is much limited by the fact that remodeling and ablation alter the normal activation pattern.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent mapping and ablation of AT after PsAF ablation were included. Surface P waves were analyzed during higher (>2:1) grades of atrioventricular block.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-six ATs with visible P waves were identified in 127 patients (macro-re-entry in 57%, centrifugal AT in 43%). One-third displayed low-voltage P waves (≤0.1 mV). An isoelectric line >80 ms was more common in centrifugal compared with macro-re-entrant AT (47% vs. 24%; p < 0.001), but its positive predictive value was limited (60%). A minority of peritricuspid ATs displayed the classic saw-tooth pattern (27% [n = 22]). However, the "precordial transition" (a gradual transition from an upright component in lead V₁ to a negative component with progression across the precordium) remained often observed and specifically identified peritricuspid AT (specificity, 98%; sensitivity, 59%). Only 2 unique features could help identify perimitral AT (n = 60). First, the presence of a negative or negative-positive P-wave in any of leads V₂ to V₆ identified perimitral AT with 97% specificity and 30% sensitivity. Second, a "notched" negative component at the beginning of a positive P-wave in the inferior leads specifically identified clockwise perimitral AT (specificity, 98%; sensitivity, 25%).

CONCLUSIONS

Only few unique electrocardiographic characteristics help identify the mechanism of AT after PsAF ablation. Knowledge of these characteristics may aid in planning and performing ablation.

Ripple mapping: Initial multicenter experience of an intuitive approach to overcoming the limitations of 3D activation mapping

BACKGROUND

Ripple mapping (RM) displays electrograms as moving bars over a three-dimensional surface displaying bipolar voltage, and has shown in a single-center series to be effective for atrial tachycardia (AT) mapping without annotation of local activation time or window-of-interest assignment. We tested the reproducibility of these findings in operators naïve to RM, using it for the first time in postablation AT.

METHODS

Maps were collected with multielectrode catheters and CARTO ConfiDENSE. A diagnosis of the tachycardia mechanism was made using RM and an assessment of operator confidence was made according to a three-grade scale (1 highest-3 lowest).

RESULTS

The first 20 patients (64 ± 9 years, median two previous ablations) undergoing RM-guided AT ablation across five sites were studied. High-density maps (2,935 ± 1,328 points) in AT (CL = 296 ± 95 milliseconds) were collected. Macroreentrant ATs bordered by scar or anatomical obstacles were identified in n = 12 (60%), small reentrant ATs around scar in n = 3 (15%), and focal ATs from scar in n = 5 (25%). Diagnostic confidence with RM was grade 1 in n = 13 (65%), where operators felt confident to proceed to ablation without entrainment. Ablation offered the correct diagnosis n = 18 (90%). Retrospective review of the accompanying LAT maps demonstrated potential sources for error related to the window of interest selection, interpolation, and differentiating regions of scar during tachycardia on the voltage map.

CONCLUSION

RM was easy to adopt by operators using it for the first time, and identified the correct target for ablation with high diagnostic confidence in most cases of complex AT.

Visualizing Localized Reentry With Ultra-High Density Mapping in Iatrogenic Atrial Tachycardia: Beware Pseudo-Reentry

BACKGROUND

The activation pattern of localized reentry (LR) in atrial tachycardia remains incompletely understood. We used the ultra-high density Rhythmia mapping system to study activation patterns in LR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

LR was suggested by small rotatory activations (carousels) containing the full spectrum of the color-coded map. Twenty-three left-sided atrial tachycardias were mapped in 15 patients (age: 64±11 years). 16 253±9192 points were displayed per map, collected over 26±14 minutes. A total of 50 carousels were identified (median 2; quartiles 1-3 per map), although this represented LR in only n=7 out of 50 (14%): here, rotation occurred around a small area of scar (<0.03 mV; 12±6 mm diameter). In LR, electrograms along the carousel encompassed the full tachycardia cycle length, and surrounding activation moved away from the carousel in all directions. Ablating fractionated electrograms (117±18 ms; 44±13% of tachycardia cycle length) within the carousel interrupted the tachycardia in every LR case. All remaining carousels were pseudo-reentrant (n=43/50 [86%]) occurring in areas of wavefront collision (n=21; median 0.5; quartiles 0-2 per map) or as artifact because of annotation of noise or interpolation in areas of incomplete mapping (n=22; median 1, quartiles 0-2 per map). Pseudo-reentrant carousels were incorrectly ablated in 5 cases having been misinterpreted as LR.

CONCLUSIONS

The activation pattern of LR is of small stable rotational activations (carousels), and this drove 30% (7/23) of our postablation atrial tachycardias. However, this appearance is most often pseudo-reentrant and must be differentiated by interpretation of electrograms in the candidate circuit and activation in the wider surrounding region.

A Prospective Study of Ripple Mapping in Atrial Tachycardias

Background—

Post ablation atrial tachycardias are characterized by low-voltage signals that challenge current mapping methods. Ripple mapping (RM) displays every electrogram deflection as a bar moving from the cardiac surface, resulting in the impression of propagating wavefronts when a series of bars move consecutively. RM displays fractionated signals in their entirety thereby helping to identify propagating activation in low-voltage areas from nonconducting tissue. We prospectively used RM to study tachycardia activation in the previously ablated left atrium.

Methods and Results—

Patients referred for atrial tachycardia ablation underwent dense electroanatomic point collection using CARTO3v4. RM was played over a bipolar voltage map and used to determine the voltage “activation threshold” that differentiated functional low voltage from nonconducting areas for each map. Ablation was guided by RM, but operators could perform entrainment or review the isochronal activation map for diagnostic uncertainty. Twenty patients were studied. Median RM determined activation threshold was 0.3 mV (0.19–0.33), with nonconducting tissue covering 33±9% of the mapped surface. All tachycardias crossed an isthmus (median, 0.52 mV, 13 mm) bordered by nonconducting tissue (70%) or had a breakout source (median, 0.35 mV) moving away from nonconducting tissue (30%). In reentrant circuits (14/20) the path length was measured (87–202 mm), with 9 of 14 also supporting a bystander circuit (path lengths, 147–234 mm). In breakout tachycardias, splitting of wavefronts resulted in 2 to 4 incomplete circuits. RM-guided ablation interrupted the tachycardia in 19 of 20 cases with the first ablation set.

Conclusions—

RM helps to define activation through low-voltage regions and aids ablation of atrial tachycardias.

Efficacy of ablation at the anteroseptal line for the treatment of perimitral flutter

Background

Left atrial flutter following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is increasingly common and difficult to treat. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ablation of the anteroseptal line connecting the right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV) to the anteroseptal mitral annulus (MA) for the treatment of perimitral flutter (PMF).

Methods

We systematically studied patients who were previously treated with AF ablation and who presented to the electrophysiology laboratory with atrial tachyarrhythmias between January 2000 and July 2010. The diagnosis of PMF was confirmed by activation mapping and/or entrainment. After re-isolation of any recovered pulmonary vein, a linear radiofrequency (RF) ablation was performed on the line that connected the RSPV to the anteroseptal MA. In this analysis, we included only patients who were treated with an anteroseptal line for their PMF.

Results

Ablation was performed at the anteroseptal line in 27 PMF patients (63±13 years; 9 women) who had undergone prior ablation for paroxysmal (n=3) or persistent (n=24) AF, using electroanatomic activation mapping (70% CARTO, 30% NavX). The anteroseptal ablation line was effective in 22/27 (81.5%) patients in the acute-care setting. Termination of AF to sinus rhythm occurred in 15/22 (68.2%) patients, and 7/22 (31.8%) patients׳ AF converted to another right or left atrial flutter. At the 6-month follow-up, 20% of patients demonstrated recurrent left atrial tachyarrhythmia. Only one patient required repeat ablation, and the remaining patients׳ condition was controlled with antiarrhythmic medications. No major procedural complications or heart block occurred.

Conclusion

Ablation at the left atrial anteroseptal line is safe and efficacious for the treatment of PMF. Unlike ablation at the traditional mitral isthmus line, ablation at the left atrial anteroseptal line does not require ablation in the coronary sinus.

[Surface ECG characteristics of right and left atrial flutter]

INTRODUCTION

Atrial tachycardia in virtually all areas of both atria has become more important in the clinical management of patients with previous complex atrial fibrillation ablation. Accurate interpretation of surface electrocardiogram (ECG) characteristics is of paramount importance to localize the origin of atrial tachycardia, particularly for planning interventional treatment. This article highlights the ECG features of different types of right and left atrial tachycardia.

DEFINITION

Typical right atrial flutter through the cavotricuspid isthmus conducts septally in a cranial direction and demonstrates sawtooth-like flutter waves which start negative in II, III and aVF and then show a steep slope upwards to the isoelectric line. The flutter rate typically ranges between 240-250 beats/min. In contrast, right atrial flutter in a clockwise rotation, flutter around the vena cava inferior or superior and around a scar (e.g. after cardiac surgery) show positive or biphasic flutter waves (lower or upper loop reentry). Left atrial flutter waves (e.g. around the mitral valve or around the pulmonary veins) are very heterogeneous and are typically positive in V1 as the left atrium is located in the posterior mediastinum.

CONCLUSION

Specific knowledge of flutter wave morphology in surface ECG facilitates planning and performance of the ablation strategy.

Atrial tachycardias following atrial fibrillation ablation

One of the most important proarrhythmic complications after left atrial (LA) ablation is regular atrial tachycardia (AT) or flutter. Those tachycardias that occur after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation can cause even more severe symptoms than those from the original arrhythmia prior to the index ablation procedure since they are often incessant and associated with rapid ventricular response. Depending on the method and extent of LA ablation and on the electrophysiological properties of underlying LA substrate, the reported incidence of late ATs is variable. To establish the exact mechanism of these tachycardias can be difficult and controversial but correlates with the ablation technique and in the vast majority of cases the mechanism is reentry related to gaps in prior ablation lines. When tachycardias occur, conservative therapy usually is not effective, radiofrequency ablation procedure is mostly successful, but can be challenging, and requires a complex approach.

Recurrent spontaneous clinical perimitral atrial tachycardia in the context of atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Recurrent perimitral atrial tachycardia (AT) is a challenging arrhythmia and is frequently encountered in the context of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and the procedural and clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent perimitral atrial tachycardia (PMAT) after AF ablation.

METHODS

Among 520 consecutive ablation procedures for recurrent AT/AF after AF ablation, 40 procedures (patients) were performed for clinically recurrent PMAT 12.1 ± 13.6 months after the last procedure (total 2.2 ± 1.3 procedures). Previously, mitral isthmus (MI) linear ablation was performed in 26 of 40 procedures, including 13 procedures with complete block and 13 with 159.0 ± 23.0 ms of conduction delay without block. As a reference group, conduction delay was evaluated in 55 patients with incomplete MI block and absence of spontaneous PMAT during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

Recurrent PMATs were terminated by MI linear ablation in 26 of 40 patients. Bidirectional block across the MI and anterior line joining the mitral annulus and left atrial roof was achieved in 33 (82.5%) and 2 (5%) patients, respectively. At mean follow-up of 26.7 ± 14.5 months, 2 patients (5%) underwent reablation for spontaneously recurrent PMAT. At 12 months after the ablation procedure for PMAT, 73.5% of the patients were free from AT/AF. Conduction delay >149 ms predicted the occurrence of spontaneous PMAT with 80.0% sensitivity and 87.3% specificity.

CONCLUSION

PMAT can recur even after successful bidirectional MI linear block. Substantial conduction delay without block across the MI from a previous procedure(s) could predispose to recurrent PMAT. Although most clinical PMATs can be successfully treated by catheter ablation, very late recurrence is possible.

Impact of atrial fibrillation termination site and termination mode in catheter ablation on arrhythmia recurrence

BACKGROUND

Although atrial fibrillation (AF) termination has been reported as a predictor of clinical outcome after persistent AF (PsAF) ablation, the relationship between AF termination site and mode and clinical outcome has not been fully evaluated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 135 patients (62±9 years) underwent their first ablation procedure for PsAF (76 longstanding PsAF). With an endpoint of AF termination, the ablation procedure was performed sequentially in the following order: pulmonary vein (PV) antrum isolation, and left atrial and right atrial substrate modification. AF termination was achieved in 69 patients (51%; 24 at the PV antrum, and 45 in the atrium; direct conversion to sinus rhythm in 21, and atrial tachycardia [AT] in 48). With a mean of 1.7±0.7 procedures/patient, 100 patients (74%) were free from atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) during a median of 15.0 months of follow-up. During the initial procedure, the AF termination site (atrium vs. PV antrum, hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-3.77; no termination vs. PV antrum, HR, 2.32; 95% CI: 1.26-6.30; P=0.023) and mode (AT vs. sinus rhythm, HR, 1.47; 95% CI: 0.77-4.01; no termination vs. sinus rhythm, HR, 2.38; 95% CI: 1.26-6.46; P=0.017) were independent predictors of ATa recurrence after the last ablation procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The site and mode of AF termination during the index ablation procedure predict ATa recurrence following multiple catheter ablation procedures for PsAF.

The Progressive Nature of Atrial Fibrillation:A Rationale for Early Restoration and Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the manifest outcome of a multifactorial, progressive disease process,secondarily or primarily involving the atrial chambers. The slowly progressive electrostructural alterations diffusely involve the atrial substrate and lead to persistent and permanent forms of AF. Although the progression of the AF disease process is variable and associated with the development of comorbid conditions, rhythm restoration therapies, particularly catheter ablation,provide higher acute and long-term success rates in paroxysmal than non-paroxysmal AF. This review of literature aims to discuss how early restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm especially using novel approaches can influence the progressive nature of atrial fibrillation.

Postablation Atrial Flutters

Mapping and ablation of post-atrial fibrillation (AF) atrial tachycardia (AT) are challenging electrophysiologic procedures. These tachycardias may be caused by multiple mechanisms and may arise from the left or right atrium, or the coronary sinus. The precise mechanism must be defined before ablation because the procedural end point depends on the correct diagnosis. Postablation ATs can be successfully ablated in approximately 90% of patients. Many patients experience recurrence despite rigorous procedural end points. Efforts should focus on decreasing the incidence of AT after AF ablation and identifying patients who require linear ablation during a procedure for persistent AF.

2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design

This is a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS), and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). This is endorsed by the governing bodies of the ACC Foundation, the AHA, the ECAS, the EHRA, the STS, the APHRS, and the HRS.

Role of the coronary sinus ostium musculature in reentrant formation

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation of focal atrial tachycardias (AT) is a validated technique with high success rates. However, electrophysiological (EP) characteristics and ablation strategy of localized reentrant AT originating from the coronary sinus ostium (CSo) have not been reported in detail so far.

METHODS

From January 2009 to July 2010, 1,453 patients underwent clinically motivated EP studies. Four patients were diagnosed with localized reentrant AT originating from the CSo. P wave morphology and consistency of tachycardia cycle length were studied. Subsequently, if reentry was suggested as an underlying mechanism for AT, color-coded 3-dimensional (3D) entrainment mapping was performed to localize the reentrant circuit or differentiate a localized reentrant AT from macroreentant AT, and also confirm reentry as an underlying mechanism of AT by evaluating consistency of return cycles after entrainment at multiple sites in both atria. Finally, activation mapping was performed to localize the earliest activation site.

RESULTS

The P wave morphologies and isoelectric line between the P waves suggested most likely an AT originating from the CSo with a centrifugal activation pattern, which was confirmed by activation mapping. Consistency of return cycles and continuously fragmented local electrograms at successful ablation sites suggested reentry as an underlying AT mechanism. Color-coded 3D entrainment mapping in all 4 patients located the reentrant circuit in the CSo. There were also two specific features observed. One was fragmented and/or double potentials recorded in the CSo with prominent prolonged electrogram duration compared to those during sinus rhythm. The other is a significant conduction delay within the CS. The myocardium of the CSo was suggested as a part of the critical isthmus within the reentrant circuit, while the rest of atria distal to the CSo and myocardial coat of the distal CS were not involved in the tachycardia circuit, which was confirmed by entrainment mapping.

CONCLUSION

Although CSo myocardium has been implicated to be a part of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report showing the localized reentrant AT confined to the CSo. Three of our patients (75%) had concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF). Further studies should be warranted to clarify the role of AT from the CS in triggering AF.

Arrhythmias (IV). Clinical approach to atrial tachycardia and atrial flutter from an understanding of the mechanisms. Electrophysiology based on anatomy

In 2009, 2343 catheter ablation procedures were performed in Spain for focal atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter (typical and atypical), with a yearly growth rate of 8%, indicating the clinical importance of these arrhythmias. The classic categorization of atrial tachycardia and atrial flutter based on rate and morphological criteria has become almost irrelevant at a time when clinical electrophysiology may lead to curative intervention based on a definition of the mechanism, making it necessary to bring laboratory experience closer to clinical practice. In this review we outline our present understanding of atrial tachycardia mechanisms, both focal and macroreentrant, and attempt to establish the conceptual links with classic concepts that may help the clinician to make a differential diagnosis and establish therapeutic indications, including that of an electrophysiologic study. Some of the concepts may seem complex, but we thought it important to provide an overview of the electrophysiological methods that may eventually lead to the description of the anatomic bases of the arrhythmias; currently, these are easier to understand thanks to the virtual anatomic casts built using computerized navigation systems.