Outcomes in patients requiring cardioversion following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Effect of electrical cardioversion on 1-year outcomes in patients with early recurrence after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence is common in the 3‐month blanking‐period after catheter ablation, during which electrical cardioversion (ECV) is usually performed to restore sinus rhythm. Whether ECV can affect the clinical outcome of post‐ablation AF patients is inconsistent, however. We aimed to explore the 1‐year effect of ECV on AF recurrence and rehospitalization in patients experienced recurrence within 3‐month after AF catheter ablation.

Methods

Patients who experienced recurrence within 3‐month after AF catheter ablation procedure were enrolled from the China Atrial Fibrillation Registry (China‐AF). A 1:3 Propensity score matching (PSM) method was applying to adjust the confounders between patients who had been treated by ECV or not. Logistic regression models were conducted to evaluate the association of ECV with 1‐year AF recurrence and rehospitalization.

Results

In this study, 2961 patients experienced AF recurrence within 3‐month after the procedure, and 282 of them underwent successful ECV, 2155 patients did not undergo ECV. One‐year AF recurrence rates were 56.4% in ECV group versus 65.4% in non‐ECV group (p = .003), and were 55.9% versus 65.9%, respectively, after PSM (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49–0.88, p = .005). However, the difference of 1‐year rehospitalization rates between two groups were not statistically significant before (ECV group: 23.7% vs. non‐ECV group: 22.3%, p = .595) and after PSM (ECV group: 24.4% vs. non‐ECV group: 21.6%, adjusted OR1.14; 95% CI 0.81–1.62, p = .451).

Conclusions

Successful ECV was associated with lower rate of one‐year recurrence in patients with early recurrent AF after catheter ablation.

Redefining the Blanking Period by a Long-Term Follow-Up after Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Second-Generation Cryoballoon

On the basis of radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), some studies suggested that early recurrences of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERATs) were associated with late AF recurrence (LAFR), and some also suspected and challenged the current recommended 90 day blanking period. We aim to evaluate the impact of ERAT on long-term success and to determine the optimum blanking period after AF ablation using second-generation cryoballoon (sg-CB). From August 2016 to October 2018, 369 consecutive patients who successfully underwent initial AF ablation using sg-CB at the Fuwai Hospital were finally enrolled. All patients were followed up no less than 12 months. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the optimum blanking period after AF ablation. There were 62 (16.8%) who experienced ERAT. After a median follow-up of 615 days, 74.5% were free of LAFR after the 90 day blanking period. Incidence of freedom from LAFR during the long-term follow-up was markedly lower in patients with ERAT than in those without ERAT (27.4% versus 84.0%; log-rank P < 0.001). Furthermore, only ERAT (HR 8.579; 95% CI 5.604-13.133; P < 0.001) was significantly associated with an increased risk of LAFR after adjusting for other factors. The optimum cut-off time point for the blanking period was 21.5 days (sensitivity: 71.1%, specificity: 94.1%). In conclusion, ERAT was an independent predictor of LAFR after AF ablation using sg-CB. Based on our findings, blanking period was advised to be shorten to 21.5 days or about 3 weeks instead of 90 days after CB ablation.

A review of factors associated with maintenance of sinus rhythm after elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common heart-rhythm disorder, affecting about 1.5% to 2% of the population with an increased risk of mortality and morbidity due to stroke, thromboembolism, and heart failure. If the conversion back to sinus rhythm does not happen spontaneously, pharmacological or electrical cardioversion (ECV) is the next available treatment options for some patients. However, the long-term success following ECV is variable. This review describes the factors that are associated with maintenance of sinus rhythm following ECV and proposes a clinical strategy based on the available evidence.

Mechanisms and clinical significance of early recurrences of atrial arrhythmias after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Early recurrence of atrial arrhythmias (ERAA) after ablation is common and strongly predicts late recurrences and ablation failure. However, since arrhythmia may eventually resolve in up to half of patients with ERAA, guidelines do not recommend immediate reintervention for ERAA episodes occurring during a 3-mo post-ablation blanking period. Certain clinical demographic, electrophysiologic, procedural, and ERAA-related characteristics may predict a higher likelihood of long-term ablation failure. In this review, we aim to discuss potential mechanisms of ERAA, and to summarize the clinical significance, prognostic implications, and treatment options for ERAA.

The association between early atrial arrhythmia and long-term return to sinus rhythm for patients following the Cox maze procedure for atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

Observational studies identified increased age, left atrial (LA) size, type and duration of atrial fibrillation (AF) as independent predictors for failure of AF surgical ablation. Rhythm at discharge following the Cox maze (CM) procedure for AF was never considered a significant predictor of success. The purposes of this study were to: (i) Determine the association of sinus rhythm (SR) at discharge and maintenance of SR. (ii) Identify the variables associated with discharge rhythm. (iii) Identify the effects of discharge rhythm on health-related quality of life (HRQL) post-CM procedure.

METHODS

A prospective study (n = 534) of CM III/IV patients. Rhythm captured during hospitalization, discharge, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months and verified by electrocardiogram and 24-h holter. Subsequent SR interventions were captured. Logistic regression identified predictors of discharge rhythm. HRQL (Short-Form 12; AF symptom frequency and Severity Checklist V3) obtained during follow-up.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight percent were discharged in SR (n = 469). LA size (OR = 1.36, CI: 1.02-1.82, P = 0.035) and long-standing AF type (OR = 2.68, CI: 1.31-5.50, P = 0.007) were the only independent predictors of non-SR at discharge. Lower rates of SR at 2 years were found in patients discharged in non-SR (75 vs 91%, P = 0.01). Patients discharged in SR had fewer perioperative morbidities [prolonged ventilation >24 h (6 vs 14%, P = 0.03), renal failure requiring dialysis (0.9 vs 5%, 0.04) and pneumonia (2 vs 9%, P = 0.005)]. During follow-up (mean = 43 ± 27 months), patients discharged in SR had fewer cardioversions (15 vs 29%, P = 0.006), similar percutaneous catheter ablations (6 vs 5%, P = 1.00) and no difference in late embolic strokes (1.5 vs 1.1%, P = 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large prospective cohort study, rhythm at discharge was found to be clinically significant with predicting SR at 24 months. Surgeons should be aware that the prognosis of non-SR patients at discharge remains excellent with high rates of SR at 24 months if managed appropriately using rhythm rather than rate control strategies.

2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design

This is a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS), and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). This is endorsed by the governing bodies of the ACC Foundation, the AHA, the ECAS, the EHRA, the STS, the APHRS, and the HRS.

Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias following radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

The use of blanking periods, the immediate period postablation during which transient tachyarrhythmia episodes are not considered recurrences, has been predicated on the assumption that not all early recurrences of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ERAT) will lead to later recurrences and, as such, does not necessarily represent treatment failure. While ERAT can be expected to occur in approximately 38% of patients within the first 3 months of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, only half of these patients will manifest later recurrences. Clinical features related to the patient's history of AF, the index ablation procedure, and particularities of the ERAT can help identify patients at higher risk of later recurrence in whom aggressive attempts to control rhythm, including early cardioversion and reintervention, may be justified.

Characteristics and significance of very early recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation

INTRODUCTION

Early restoration of sinus rhythm following ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) facilitates reverse atrial remodeling and improves the long-term outcome. The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors and outcome in patients with very early AF recurrences (< 2 days).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ablation was performed in 339 consecutive AF patients (paroxysmal AF = 262). Biatrial voltage was mapped during sinus rhythm. If recurrent AF occurred within 2 days following the ablation, electrical cardioversion was performed to restore sinus rhythm. Very early recurrences of AF occurred in 39 (15%) patients with paroxysmal AF and 26 (34%) with nonparoxysmal AF. Patients with very early recurrence had a higher incidence of nonparoxysmal AF (40% vs 18.6%, P< 0.001), requirement of electrical cardioversion during procedure, larger left atrial (LA) diameter (43 ± 7 vs 39 ± 6 mm, P< 0.001), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (54 ± 10% vs 59 ± 7, P< 0.001), longer procedural time, and lower LA voltage (1.5 ± 0.7 vs 1.9 ± 0.8 mV, P< 0.001). A multivariate analysis revealed that the independent predictors of a very early recurrence were a longer procedural time and lower LA voltage. During a follow-up of 13 ± 5 months, a very early recurrence did not predict the long-term outcome of a single procedure recurrence in the patients with paroxysmal AF, but was associated with a late recurrence in the nonparoxysmal AF patients.

CONCLUSION

Very early recurrence occurred in patients with paroxysmal AF is not associated with long-term recurrence. Nonparoxysmal AF is an independent predictor of late recurrence of AF in patients with very early recurrence.