Impact of adenosine-provoked acute dormant pulmonary vein conduction on recurrence of atrial fibrillation

Acute STEMI Due to Severe Triple-Vessel Spasm After IV Adenosine Injection During Cryo-Balloon Isolation

Adenosine IV is commonly used after pulmonary vein isolation to check for dormant electrical conduction. Herein, we present the case of a 60-year-old patient who exhibited marked hypotension, conduction abnormalities, and ST-segment elevation after routine adenosine injection. Coronary angiography revealed diffuse coronary spasm that was successfully treated with intracoronary nitroglycerin. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

Optimal interlesion distance in ablation index-guided pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

Ablation index (AI) is a useful tool of the CARTO® system to make effective lesions during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the optimal distance between neighboring ablation points (interlesion distance (ILD)) is still unclear. Here, we evaluated the optimal ILDs in the AI-guided PVI.

METHODS

Forty-nine AF patients who underwent AI-guided PVI in our institute from July 2018 to March 2019 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Target AI was set at 500 and 400 for anterior and posterior walls, respectively, and we compared the ILDs with and without electrical gaps after a first encircling PVI.

RESULTS

In both PV, the ILDs with electrical gaps were longer than those without electrical gaps. The best cutoff values of ILD to detect the electrical gaps using the ROC curve were 5.4 mm for the RPV anterior wall (AUC, 0.67; sensitivity, 0.42; specificity, 0.84, P < 0.01) and 4.4 mm for the RPV posterior wall (AUC, 0.68; sensitivity, 0.91; specificity, 0.39, P < 0.01). Similarly, the best cutoff values of ILD were 5.5 mm for the LPV anterior wall (AUC, 0.74; sensitivity, 0.65; specificity, 0.82, P < 0.01) and 5.1 mm for the LPV posterior wall (AUC, 0.67; sensitivity, 0.79; specificity, 0.53, P =0.03).

CONCLUSION

The optimal interlesion distances for PVI were different in each PV segment. To achieve the first-pass isolation, less than 5.4/4.4 mm for the RPV anterior/posterior and 5.5/5.1 mm for the LPV anterior/posterior walls of interlesion distances were the best cutoff values in the patients with AF.

Intraprocedural endpoints to predict durable pulmonary vein isolation: a randomized trial of four post-ablation techniques

AIMS

The optimal procedural endpoint to achieve permanent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) during ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unknown. We aimed to compare the impact of prolonged waiting periods and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) testing after PVI on long-term freedom from AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In total, 538 patients (median age 61 years, 62% male) undergoing first-time radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal AF were randomized into four groups: Group 1 [PVI (no testing), n = 121], Group 2 (PVI + 30min waiting phase, n = 151), Group 3 (PVI+ATP, n = 131), and Group 4 (PVI + 30min+ATP, n = 135). The primary endpoint was freedom from AF. Repeat mapping to assess for late pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection was performed in patients who remained AF-free for >3 years (n = 46) and in those who had repeat ablation for AF recurrence (n = 82). During initial procedure, acute PV reconnection was observed in 33%, 26%, and 42% of patients in Groups 2, 3, and 4, respectively. At 36 months, no significant differences in freedom from AF recurrence were observed among all four groups (55%, 61%, 50%, and 62% for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively; P = 0.258). Late PV reconnection was commonly observed, with a similar incidence between patients with and without AF recurrence (74% vs. 83%; P = 0.224).

CONCLUSION

Although PVI remains the cornerstone for AF ablation, intraprocedural techniques to assess for PV reconnection did not improve long-term success. Patients without AF recurrence after 3 years exhibited similarly high rates of PV reconnection as those that underwent repeat ablation for AF recurrence. The therapeutic mechanisms of AF ablation may not be solely predicated upon durable PVI.

Clinical Implications of Unmasking Dormant Conduction After Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation Using Adenosine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) is a routine ablation strategy of atrial fibrillation (AF). The adenosine test can be used to unmask dormant conduction (DC) of pulmonary veins after CPVI, thereby demonstrating possible pulmonary vein re-connection and the need for further ablation. However, whether adenosine test could help improve the long term successful rate of CPVI is still controversial. This systemic review and meta-analysis was to determine the clinical utility of the adenosine test.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library database were searched through July 2016 to identify relevant studies using the keywords “dormant pulmonary vein conduction,” “adenosine test,” “circumferential pulmonary vein isolation,” and “atrial fibrillation.” A random-effects model was used to compare pooled outcomes and tested for heterogeneity.

Results: A total of 17 studies including 5,169 participants were included in the final meta-analysis. Two groups of comparisons were classified: (1) Long-term successful rate in those AF patients underwent CPVI with and without adenosine test [Group A (+) and Group A (−)]; (2) Long-term successful rate in those patients who had adenosine test with and without dormant conduction [Group DC (+) and Group DC (−)]. The overall meta-analysis showed that no significant difference can be observed between Group A (+) and Group A (−) (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.97–1.19; P = 0.16; I² = 66%) and between Group DC (+) and Group DC (−) (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.91–1.12; P = 0.88; I² = 60%).

Conclusion: Pooled meta-analysis suggested adenosine test may not improve long-term successful rate in AF patients underwent CPVI. Furthermore, AF recurrence may not be decreased by eliminating DC provoked by adenosine, even though adenosine test was applied after CPVI.

No association between dormant conduction sites and pulmonary vein reconnection sites in late atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation

OBJECTIVE

Despite use of provocation testing to unmask dormant left atrium (LA)-PV conduction after index pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF), AF recurrence still occurs, with PV reconnection as the main cause. In an effort to answer the question whether freedom from AF recurrence can be achieved by ablation that targets sites of dormant conduction, we compared sites of dormant conduction against sites of PV reconnection identified at the time of repeat ablation for AF recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study group comprised 46 patients (30 men/16 women, aged 58.7±10.3 years) with AF (paroxysmal: n=37, persistent: n=9) who underwent repeat ablation for AF recurrence 12.3 (7.4-29.7) months after the index ablation procedure. Ipsilateral PVs were divided into 8 segments each (736 total segments), and the relation between dormant conduction sites and PV reconnection sites was determined per segment.

RESULTS

Dormant LA-PV conduction was unmasked and ablated in 22 (47.8%) of the 46 patients at sites within 43 (5.8%) of the 736 PV segments. Late PV reconnection was found within 122 (17%) of the 736 PV segments at the time of re-ablation for AF recurrence. Only 22 (18%) of these 122 PV segments corresponded to dormant conduction sites identified during the index procedure.

CONCLUSION

Although additional ablation to eliminate dormant PV conduction unmasked during the index ablation procedure is performed, the majority of PVs that show reconduction at the time of treatment for clinical AF recurrence are PVs that have not shown dormant conduction.

Influence of balloon temperature and time to pulmonary vein isolation on acute pulmonary vein reconnection and clinical outcomes after cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist on indicators of durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) undergoing cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). We investigated whether balloon temperature and time to PVI can be used to predict early PV reconduction (EPVR), including residual PV conduction and adenosine triphosphate-induced dormant conduction and the relation between touch-up ablation of EPVR sites and mid-term recurrence of AF.

METHODS

We obtained procedural and outcome data from the records of 130 consecutive patients who underwent CBA and followed up for 13.4 months.

RESULTS

EPVR was identified in 86 (17%) PVs of 61 (47%) patients. Balloon temperatures during 30 seconds (-27 ± 5.7°C vs -31 ± 5.5°C), 60 seconds (-36 ± 5.6°C vs -41 ± 5.4°C), and at the nadir point (-41 ± 7.4°C vs -49 ± 7.0°C) were significantly higher, and the time to PVI was longer (90 ± 50 seconds vs 52 ± 29 seconds) in PVs with EPVR than in those without (P < 0.0001 for all). Among PVs without EPVR, the time to PVI was longer and balloon temperature was lower for the left superior pulmonary vein/ right inferior pulmonary vein (LSPV/RIPV) than for the right superior pulmonary vein/left inferior pulmonary vein (RSPV/LIPV) (time: 60 ± 25/73 ± 37 seconds vs 41 ± 31/45 ± 20 seconds, P < 0.0001) (temp: -39.2 ± 11.3/-39.4 ± 8.3°C vs -33.8 ± 10.6/-33.6 ± 6.8°C, P = 0.0023). AF recurrence rates were equivalent between patients with and without EPVR (13% [8/69] vs 15% [9/61], P = 0.845).

CONCLUSIONS

Cryoballoon temperature and time to PVI appear to be useful in predicting durable PVI, that is, prevention of EPVR, but the balloon temperature and time required for PVI differ between PVs. Although EPVR does not predict AF recurrence, high success rates can be expected when touch-up ablation of EPVR sites is performed.

Efficacy of adjunctive measures used to assist pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pulmonary vein reconnection leading to recurrence of atrial arrhythmias after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation remains a significant challenge. A number of adjunctive measures during PVI have been used to attempt to reduce pulmonary vein reconnection and recurrence of atrial arrhythmias. We performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the efficacy of adjunctive measures used during PVI in reducing recurrent atrial arrhythmias.

RECENT FINDINGS

Our literature search found four interventions that met the prespecified definition of adjunctive measure: adenosine testing post-PVI, contact force-guided PVI, pacing inexcitability of the ablation line during PVI and additional ablation based on the computed tomography thickness of the pulmonary vein-left atrial appendage ridge. Sixteen studies enrolling 3507 patients met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. PVI performed with adjunctive measures was shown to reduce the 1-year recurrence rate of atrial arrhythmias. The point estimate for the combined relative risk of atrial arrhythmia recurrence was 0.56 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43-0.73; P value <0.001] in the PVI with adjunctive measures group.

SUMMARY

PVI for atrial fibrillation assisted by adjunctive measures results in clinically significant reduction of recurrent atrial arrhythmias. Additional research is required to assess the relative efficacy of individual or combined adjunctive strategies used during PVI for atrial fibrillation.

Adenosine triphosphate/adenosine guided pulmonary vein isolation does not improve the outcomes of ablation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the most reliable predictor of success after ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) unmasks the dormant conduction and can be used to improve the effectiveness of PVI. The impact of ATP guided PVI on clinical outcomes is discordant in various randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

OBJECTIVES

To delineate the incremental benefit of ATP during PVI in patients with AF through a meta-analysis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Database searches through January 2017 identified 5 RCTs (enrolling 2839 patients) comparing ATP guided PVI versus standard PVI (non-ATP). Four trials exclusively studied paroxysmal AF while one trial included both paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal AF patients. Baseline characteristics, dose of adenosine and ablation strategies were clearly identified among all the trials. The risk ratio (RR) for AF episodes lasting >30 s after 3-month blanking period was calculated with random effects meta-analysis and showed no difference at a median follow up of 12 months [RR: 1.02, 95 % Confidence interval (CI): 0.85 to 1.25; p = 0.82]. Similarly, the number of repeat ablation was similar in both groups [RR: 1.02, 95 % CI: 0.63, 1.56; p = 0.98].

CONCLUSIONS

ATP guided PVI does not decrease the recurrence of AF or the need for repeat ablation at 12 months.

Feasibility of total intravenous anesthesia by cardiologists with the support of anesthesiologists during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The optimal methodology for sedation and anesthesia during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has not been well established. We assessed the feasibility of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) by cardiologists with support from anesthesiologists during AF ablation and quality of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and single procedure success rate at 12 months.

METHODS

TIVA was performed by cardiologists using IV propofol and fentanyl under controlled ventilation via i-gel™ without neuromuscular blocking drugs in 160 consecutive patients (80 nonparoxysmal) with no anticipated difficult airway or other severe diseases. Anesthesiologists were requested to be on standby during the procedure. The incidence of anesthesia-associated complications and ablation-associated complications were assessed. To evaluate the quality of PVI, the prevalence of acute adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-provoked PV reconnections and late PV reconnections among those requiring a redo procedure was analyzed.

RESULTS

TIVA was successfully completed in 152 patients (95%). In five (3%), we requested help from anesthesiologists, and in three (2%), TIVA was abandoned. No major anesthesia-associated complications were observed. Ablation-associated complications were observed in seven patients (4%). ATP provocation test was performed in 141 patients, and no acute PV reconnections were observed in 134 (95%). Success rates at 12 months were 85% of patients off antiarrhythmic drugs. Twenty-one of 24 patients with recurrence underwent a redo session, and 18 (86%) had no PV reconnections.

CONCLUSIONS

TIVA by cardiologists with support from anesthesiologists during AF ablation may be feasible. The success rate at 12 months was high, and prevalence of acute and late PV reconnection was very low.

Value of adenosine test to reveal dormant conduction or adenosine-induced atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation

Background

Recent studies investigating the implications of additional ablation guided by dormant pulmonary vein (PV) conduction testing using adenosine showed conflicting results, and the data about atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after trigger site elimination in adenosine-induced AF are still lacking.

Methods

Of 846 patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) who underwent PV isolation (PVI), adenosine test after PVI was performed in 148 patients.

Results

PVI was successfully achieved in 846 patients. We excluded 58 patients due to loss to the follow-up. A higher rate of AF recurrence was found in the group without adenosine test (136/644, 21%) compared to the group with adenosine test (20/144, 13%, log-rank P=0.047). In multivariate analysis model for AF freedom during the follow-up period, the only significant clinical predictor of AF freedom was adenosine test (hazard ratio [HR] 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-3.23; P=0.007).Among 148 patients with adenosine test, 114 (77%) patients showed neither dormant conductions nor AF-induced, 22 (15%) showed positive dormant conductions only, and 12 (8%) revealed adenosine-induced AF (6 of them also showed dormant conduction). After additional ablation in positive dormant conduction group and adenosine-induced AF group, AF recurrence was noted in 4/21 (19%) patients in positive dormant conduction group and 2/11 (18%) patients in adenosine-induced AF group, which was not different from that of patients in negative dormant conduction/ no AF-induced group (14/112, 12%, log-rank P=0.67).

Conclusions

Adenosine test after PVI to confirm the absence of dormant conduction and triggers initiating AF is beneficial to improve the outcomes after catheter ablation of PAF.

Adenosine Testing After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Adenosine can be used to reveal dormant pulmonary vein (PV) conduction after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of adenosine administration in patients undergoing PVI for AF.

METHODS

Meta-analysis of 22 studies was performed to assess the rates of freedom from AF in 1) patients with dormant PV conduction versus patients without dormant PV conduction, and 2) patients given routine adenosine post PVI versus patients not given adenosine. Relative-risks (RR) were calculated using random effects modelling.

RESULTS

In 18 studies, 3038 patients received adenosine and freedom from AF in those patients with dormant PV reconnection was significantly lower (62.9%) compared to patients without PV reconnection (67.2%) (RR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78-0.98). In seven studies with 3049 patients, the freedom from AF was significantly higher in patients who received adenosine (67%) versus those patients who did not receive adenosine (63%) (RR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.01-1.22).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed clear benefits of adenosine testing for freedom from AF recurrence. Adenosine-guided dormant conduction is associated with higher AF recurrence despite further ablation. Future studies should investigate the optimal methodology, including dosage and waiting time between PVI and adenosine administration.

Redefining the Blanking Period After Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From the ADVICE (Adenosine Following Pulmonary Vein Isolation to Target Dormant Conduction Elimination) Trial

BACKGROUND

Early recurrences (ERs) of atrial tachyarrhythmia are common after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. A 3-month blanking period is recommended by current guidelines. This study sought to investigate the significance of ER during the first 3 months post ablation in predicting late recurrences and determine whether it varies according to timing.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 401 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation were followed for 12 months with transtelephonic monitoring in the ADVICE (Adenosine Following Pulmonary Vein Isolation to Target Dormant Conduction Elimination) trial. Patients with atrial tachyarrhythmia ≥30 s within the 3-month blanking period were stratified according to the timing of ER. A total of 179 patients (44.6%) experienced their last episode of ER during the first (n=53), second (n=44), or third (n=82) month of the 3-month blanking period. One-year freedom from symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia was 77.2% in patients without ER compared with 62.6%, 36.4%, and 7.8% in patients with ER 1, 2, and 3 months post ablation, respectively (P<0.0001). Receiver operating curve analyses revealed a strong correlation between the timing of ER and late recurrence (area under the curve 0.82, P<0.0001). Corresponding hazard ratios for ER during the first, second, and third months were 1.84, 4.45, and 9.64, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study validates the use of a blanking period after catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation but calls into question the 90-day cut-off value. In particular, >90% of patients with ER during the third month post ablation experience late recurrence by 1 year. However, pending further study, repeat ablation before 90 days cannot be routinely advocated.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01058980.

Adenosine-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of adenosine-mediated dormant pulmonary vein conduction, and whether such dormant conduction should be eliminated, remains controversial. We sought to perform a meta-analysis of data from eligible studies to delineate the prognostic impact of adenosine-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using online databases in order to identify relevant studies from January 2004 to September 2016. Ten studies [six observational and four randomized control trials (RCTs)] were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Five studies (two observational and three RCTs) compared the efficacy of adenosine-mediated elimination of dormant conduction versus no adenosine test. Overall, the adenosine-guided ablation strategy displayed better long-term outcomes as compared with no adenosine testing (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.14, p=0.02; Heterogeneity: I²=42%, p: 0.14). The meta-analysis of only RCTs failed to show any differences between the two strategies (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.96-1.11, p=0.37; Heterogeneity: I² 0%, p: 0.41). Eight studies (five observational and three RCTs) addressed the efficacy of adenosine-induced dormant conduction and additional ablation versus no dormant conduction during adenosine challenge. Overall, a trend towards a better outcome in those without dormant conduction during drug challenge was noted (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.03, p=0.11; Heterogeneity: I² 65% p: 0.006). The pooled analysis of RCTs failed to show any differences between the two arms (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.62-1.30, p= 0.57; Heterogeneity: I² 88%, p: 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Adenosine-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation does not provide additional benefit in terms of freedom of arrhythmia recurrence.

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: Achieving permanent pulmonary vein isolation by point-by-point radiofrequency lesions

Pulmonary vein isolation by point-by-point radiofrequency catheter ablation constitutes the cornerstone of catheter ablation strategies for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. However, despite advances in pulmonary vein isolation ablation strategies, long-term success rates after ablation remain suboptimal, which highlights the need to develop techniques to achieve more durable lesions. Strategies proposed to improve the durability of pulmonary vein isolation can be divided into two groups: Those addressed to improving the quality of the lesion and those that optimize the detection of acute PV reconnection during the ablation procedure. This manuscript reviews the role and potential benefits of these techniques according to current clinical evidence.

Adenosine administration during hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation to test dormant pulmonary vein conduction

Background

Adenosine administration after initial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) reveals dormant conduction and predicts atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. Elimination of dormant conduction when present may increase a long-term success rate of AF ablation procedures. There are no studies till date using adenosine to reveal acute reconduction of pulmonary veins (PVs) after epicardial PVI during a hybrid AF ablation procedure.

Methods

We included 24 patients (21 male, 55 ± 9 years) undergoing hybrid ablation for symptomatic paroxysmal (n = 12) and persistent (n = 12) AF, using an epicardial bipolar radiofrequency clamp to perform PVI. All antiarrhythmic medications were discontinued 5 days prior to the procedure, except for patients on amiodarone. Thirty minutes after PVI and once sinus rhythm was obtained, a bolus of adenosine (12 to 36 mg) was administered intravenously. The subsequent response was assessed for each PV (n = 96) using an in situ circular mapping catheter.

Results

Dormant conduction (i.e., the reappearance of PV potentials during at least one beat) was seen in 1 out of 96 PVs (1%). If reconduction was seen, further endocardial ablation using a 3.5-mm irrigated tip catheter was performed until no more reconduction occurred after repeating the adenosine bolus.

Conclusions

Adenosine administration after PVI with the use of an epicardial bipolar radiofrequency clamp in the setting of hybrid AF ablation reveals acute reconduction in 1% of the PVs.

Impact of deep sedation on the electrophysiological behavior of pulmonary vein and non-PV firing during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is performed with and without deep sedation, which could affect the arrhythmogenic activity during the procedure. We investigated the impact of sedation on electrophysiological properties in patients with AF who underwent catheter ablation.

METHODS

This study consisted of 255 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (229 males, persistent: 105 patients) who underwent a single-catheter ablation procedure. The patients were divided into the following two groups according to the depth of sedation during the procedure: group M (mild sedation with flunitrazepam in 138 patients) and group D (deep sedation with propofol in 117 patients). Peripheral oxygen saturation was continuously monitored via pulse oximetry throughout the procedure.

RESULTS

A spontaneous dissociated pulmonary vein activity after pulmonary vein isolation occurred more frequently in group M than in group D (29.1 vs 15.7%, P < 0.01). Adenosine-induced dormant pulmonary vein conduction was more frequently observed in group M than in group D (19.2 vs 13.0% P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the incidence of non-pulmonary vein triggers between groups M and D (15.2 vs 11.1%, P = 0.53). The atrial fibrillation recurrence rate following the single procedure did not differ between the two groups (29.0 vs 26.5%, in groups M and D, P = 0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Although deep sedation reduced the incidence of a dissociated pulmonary vein activity and dormant pulmonary vein conduction following pulmonary vein isolation, it did not affect the recurrence rate for atrial fibrillation after the procedure.

Who Needs Catheter Ablation And Which Approach?

Catheter ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) has gained a significant role during maintenance of sinus rhythm compared to anti-arrhythmic medication. Catheter ablation techniques are also improved and progressed over years in parallel to better understanding of disease mechanisms and technological advancements. However, due to invasive nature of the therapy with its pertinent procedural risks, both appropriate patient selection and use of relevant approach should be considered by all electrophysiologists before decide to perform catheter ablation.

Adenosine testing during cryoballoon ablation and radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

The infusion of adenosine triphosphate after radiofrequency (RF) pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI), which may result in acute transient PV-atrium reconnection, can unmask dormant conduction.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence and characteristics of dormant conduction after cryoballoon (CB) and RF ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Of 414 consecutive patients undergoing initial catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF, 246 (59%) propensity score-matched patients (123 CB-PVI and 123 RF-PVI) were included.

RESULTS

Dormant conduction was less frequently observed in patients who underwent CB-PVI than in those who underwent RF-PVI (4.5% vs 12.8% of all PVs; P < .0001). The incidence of dormant conduction in each PV was lower in patients who underwent CB-PVI than in those who underwent RF-PVI in the left superior PV (P < .0001) and right superior PV (P = .001). The site of dormant conduction was mainly located around the bottom of both inferior PVs after CB-PVI. Multivariable analysis revealed that a longer time to the elimination of the PV potential (odds ratio 1.018; 95% confidence interval 1.001-1.036; P = .04) and the necessity of touch-up ablation (odds ratio 3.242; 95% confidence interval 2.761-7.111; P < .0001) were independently associated with the presence of dormant conduction after CB-PVI. After the elimination of dormant conduction by additional ablation, the AF-free rate was similar in patients with and without dormant conduction after both CB-PVI and RF-PVI (P = .28 and P = .73, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The results of the propensity score-matched analysis showed that dormant PV conduction was less frequent after CB ablation than after RF ablation and was not associated with ablation outcomes.

Predictors of chronic pulmonary vein reconnections after contact force-guided ablation: importance of completing electrical isolation with circumferential lines and creating sufficient ablation lesion densities

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify the predictors of chronic pulmonary vein reconnections (CPVRs) after contact force (CF)-guided circumferential PV isolation (CPVI) of atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Forty-nine consecutive patients undergoing second ablation procedures for recurrent AF after CF-guided ablation were retrospectively studied. The CPVI was performed by point-by-point ablation with a target CF of 15-20 g. The incidence of CPVRs was evaluated along the right- and left-sided anterior and posterior CPVI regions (Ant-RPVs, Post-RPVs, Ant-LPVs, and Post-LPVs).

RESULTS

CPVRs were observed in 30.6, 22.4, 20.4, and 32.7 % of patients along the Ant-RPVs, Post-RPVs, Ant-LPVs, and Post-LPVs, respectively (P = 0.436). In the multivariate logistic analyses, completing a left atrium-PV conduction block with touch-up ablation inside the initially estimated CPVI lines (Ant-RPVs, Post-RPVs, Ant-LPVs, Post-LPVs; odds ratio [OR] 5.747, 15.000, 207.619, 7.940; P = 0.032, 0.004, 0.034, 0.021) and region length (Post-LPVs; OR 3.183, P = 0.027) were positive predictors of CPVRs, while the mean CF (Ant-RPVs; OR 0.861, P = 0.045) and number of radiofrequency applications per unit length (Ant-LPVs, Post-LPVs; OR 0.038, 0.122; P = 0.034, 0.029) were negative predictors. At optimal cutoffs of 5.8 cm for the region length, 14.2 g for the mean CF, and 1.97/cm (Ant-LPVs) and 2.01/cm (Post-LPVs) for the radiofrequency application density, the sensitivity and specificity were 93.8 and 63.6 %, 60.0 and 76.5 %, 90.0 and 64.1 %, and 75.0 and 63.6 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Completing PVI with circumferential lines without touch-up ablation and creating a sufficient density of radiofrequency ablation lesions on the lines with a sufficient CF may be necessary to prevent CPVRs after a CF-guided CPVI.

The Role of Adenosine in Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Critical Review

The cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), which can be achieved in more than 95% of patients at the end of the procedure. However, AF recurrence rates remain high and are related to recovery of PV conduction. Adenosine testing is used to unmask dormant pulmonary vein conduction (DC). The aim of this study is to review the available literature addressing the role of adenosine testing and determine the impact of ablation at sites of PV reconnection on freedom from AF. Adenosine infusion, by restoring the excitability threshold, unmasks reversible injury that could lead to recovery of PV conduction. The studies included in this review suggest that adenosine is useful to unmask nontransmural lesions at risk of reconnection and that further ablation at sites of DC is associated with improvement in freedom from AF. Nevertheless it has been demonstrated that adenosine is not able to predict all veins at risk of later reconnection, which means that veins without DC are not necessarily at low risk. The role of the waiting period in the setting of adenosine testing has also been analyzed, suggesting that in the acute phase adenosine use should be accompanied by enough waiting time.

Difference Between Dormant Conduction Sites Revealed by Adenosine Triphosphate Provocation and Unipolar Pace-Capture Sites Along the Ablation Line After Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Dormant pulmonary vein (PV) conduction revealed by adenosine/adenosine triphosphate (ATP) provocation test and exit block to the left atrium by pacing from the PV side of the ablation line ("pace and ablate" method) are used to ensure durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, the mechanistic relation between ATP-provoked PV reconnection and the unexcitable gap along the ablation line is unclear.Forty-five patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) (paroxysmal: 31 patients, persistent: 14 patients; age: 61.1 ± 9.7 years) underwent extensive encircling PVI (EEPVI, 179 PVs). After completion of EEPVI, an ATP provocation test (30 mg, bolus injection) and unipolar pacing (output, 10 mA; pulse width, 2 ms) were performed along the previous EEPVI ablation line to identify excitable gaps. Dormant conduction was revealed in 29 (34 sites) of 179 PVs (16.2%) after EEP-VI (22/45 patients). Pace capture was revealed in 59 (89 sites) of 179 PVs (33.0%) after EEPVI (39/45 patients), and overlapping sites, ie, sites showing both dormant conduction and pace capture, were observed in 22 of 179 (12.3%) PVs (17/45 patients).Some of the ATP-provoked dormant PV reconnection sites were identical to the sites with excitable gaps revealed by pace capture, but most of the PV sites were differently distributed, suggesting that the main underling mechanism differs between these two forms of reconnection. These findings also suggest that performance of the ATP provocation test followed by the "pace and ablate" method can reduce the occurrence of chronic PV reconnections.

[Mapping and ablation of a mechanically blocked concealed accessory pathway under repeated adenosine bolus infusions]

During mapping and catheter ablation of an accessory pathway, a mechanically induced conduction block can occur. Adenosine is used to detect dormant conduction of incomplete ablation lesions. Presented in this article is the case of a patient with a left-sided accessory pathway, which was mechanically blocked during the mapping procedure and could only be successfully ablated after repeated adenosine bolus infusions, which resulted in intermittent restitution of conduction via the accessory pathway.

Randomized comparison of contact force-guided versus conventional circumferential pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation: prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of electrical reconnections and clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

We prospectively investigated the differences in pulmonary vein reconnections (PVRs) and clinical outcomes between contact force (CF)-guided and conventional circumferential PV isolation (CPVI) of atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

One hundred twenty consecutive AF patients (63 ± 10 years; 88 males) undergoing an initial CPVI were randomized to ablation with a target CF of 20 g (CF group; n = 60) or that with operators blinded to the CF information (blind group; n = 60).

RESULTS

The CF group had fewer PVRs (0.67 ± 0.91/patient vs. 1.16 ± 1.16/patient; P = 0.007), a lower incidence of persistent PVRs (13.2 vs. 41.2%; P < 0.001), and a shorter procedural time for the CPVI (50 vs. 56 min; P = 0.019) than the blind group. The mean CF was higher in the CF group than the blind group (18.0 vs. 16.1 g; P < 0.001), with the most significant difference observed along the posterior right-sided PVs (P-RPVs) and anterior left-sided PVs (A-LPVs). In logistic regression models, the mean CF was a negative predictor of PVRs along the P-RPVs and A-LPVs in the blind group (odds ratios, 0.728 and 0.786; P < 0.001 and 0.007), while no significant predictor was identified in the CF group or elsewhere in the blind group. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the arrhythmia-free survival rate at 12 months was 89.9% in the CF group and 88.2% in the blind group, respectively (P = 0.624).

CONCLUSIONS

CF-guided CPVI can reduce PVRs and the procedural time and be particularly beneficial along regions where a relatively low CF tends to be applied: the P-RPVs and A-LPVs. The comparable clinical outcomes may be due to the learning curve effect obtained by the CF-guided technique and repeated provocation of dormant PV conduction.

Adenosine-guided pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an international, multicentre, randomised superiority trial

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation is increasingly used to manage atrial fibrillation, but arrhythmia recurrences are common. Adenosine might identify pulmonary veins at risk of reconnection by unmasking dormant conduction, and thereby guide additional ablation to improve arrhythmia-free survival. We assessed whether adenosine-guided pulmonary vein isolation could prevent arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

We did this randomised trial at 18 hospitals in Australia, Europe, and North America. We enrolled patients aged older than 18 years who had had at least three symptomatic atrial fibrillation episodes in the past 6 months, and for whom treatment with an antiarrhythmic drug failed. After pulmonary vein isolation, intravenous adenosine was administered. If dormant conduction was present, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to additional adenosine-guided ablation to abolish dormant conduction or to no further ablation. If no dormant conduction was revealed, randomly selected patients were included in a registry. Patients were masked to treatment allocation and outcomes were assessed by a masked adjudicating committee. Patients were followed up for 1 year. The primary outcome was time to symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia after a single procedure in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01058980.

FINDINGS

Adenosine unmasked dormant pulmonary vein conduction in 284 (53%) of 534 patients. 102 (69·4%) of 147 patients with additional adenosine-guided ablation were free from symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia compared with 58 (42·3%) of 137 patients with no further ablation, corresponding to an absolute risk reduction of 27·1% (95% CI 15·9-38·2; p<0·0001) and a hazard ratio of 0·44 (95% CI 0·31-0·64; p<0·0001). Of 115 patients without dormant pulmonary vein conduction, 64 (55·7%) remained free from symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia (p=0·0191 vs dormant conduction with no further ablation). Occurrences of serious adverse events were similar in each group. One death (massive stroke) was deemed probably related to ablation in a patient included in the registry.

INTERPRETATION

Adenosine testing to identify and target dormant pulmonary vein conduction during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is a safe and highly effective strategy to improve arrhythmia-free survival in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. This approach should be considered for incorporation into routine clinical practice.

FUNDING

Canadian Institutes of Health Research, St Jude Medical, Biosense-Webster, and M Lachapelle (Montreal Heart Institute Foundation).

Reappraisal of the clinical implications of adenosine triphosphate in terms of the prediction of reconnection sites in cases with electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins

PURPOSE

Dormant conduction (DC) induced by intravenous adenosine triphosphate (ATP) after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) could predict subsequent PV reconnection (RC) sites. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the DC and RC sites during the long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Ninety-one consecutive patients (62 males; mean age, 62 ± 11 years) with symptomatic persistent (n = 18) or paroxysmal (n = 73) atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent PVI were included in this study. After a successful PVI, we administered ATP to reveal the DC sites. In total, DC sites were observed in 46 (51%) patients, and all were left un-ablated after marking or tagging all of them using fluoroscopic images and a three-dimensional (3D) mapping system. After the follow-up period (14.8 ± 3.6 months), AF recurred in 29 (32%) patients, all of whom had a DC in the initial ablation session, and underwent redo sessions. We divided the DC sites into three groups; in group A, the RC sites differed from the DC sites, in group B, the RC sites were identical to the DC sites, and in group C, the RC sites involved both DC and other sites.

RESULTS

As a result, 20 (69%), 3 (11.5%), and 6 (19.5%) patients belonged to groups A, B, and C, respectively. Statistical analyses comparing the agreement between DC and the RC sites yielded a weak relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

DC sites implying RC sites had a weak agreement, and other options to predict RC sites will be required to improve the clinical benefit of CA of AF.

Unmasking the dormant pulmonary vein conduction with adenosine administration after pulmonary vein isolation with laser energy

AIMS

The isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) is the mainstay of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, which with current ablation techniques can be achieved in almost all cases. Reconnection of PVs constitutes the most frequent cause of AF recurrence. Visually guided laser balloon ablation (VGLA) is a novel system with very high rate of persistence of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) three months after the first procedure shown in preclinical and clinical studies. We aimed to determine the acute efficiency of the laser energy during PVI with the help of adenosine provocation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (19 male; mean age 64 ± 9 years) with symptomatic paroxysmal AF were included in the study. Pulmonary vein isolation was performed using the VGLA system. After successful PVI, we studied the effects of intravenous adenosine (18 mg) on activation of each PV at least 20 min after PVI. A total of 104 PVs were targeted. The balloon catheter could not be placed in two PVs. Of the remaining 102 PVs 99 (97% of the ablated PVs) could be successfully isolated. Adenosine was administered for each isolated PV in 25 patients. Only six PVs (6.7%) in five patients (20%) showed a PV reconnection during adenosine provocation.

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary vein isolation with VGLA is a feasible technique for PVI with a very effective acute lesion formation. The clinical significance of this low reconnection rate has to be determined.

Mechanisms and clinical significance of adenosine-induced dormant accessory pathway conduction after catheter ablation

BACKGROUND

Adenosine can unmask dormant pulmonary vein conduction after isolation. The role of adenosine in uncovering dormant accessory pathway (AP) conduction after AP ablation is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated 109 consecutive patients (age, 41 ± 28 years; 62 [57%] men) who were administered adenosine after successful AP ablation. Dormant AP conduction was defined as adenosine-induced recurrent AP conduction, as demonstrated by recurrent preexcitation or change in retrograde ventriculoatrial activation patterns. Dormant AP conduction was identified in 13 (12%) patients. Adenosine led to transient retrograde AP conduction in 6 patients and transient anterograde AP conduction in 8 patients. In all these cases, adenosine-induced AP conduction occurred during the bradycardia phase of adenosine effect and resulted in dormant AP conduction times shorter than atrioventricular nodal conduction times before adenosine administration. On the basis of analysis of timing of occurrence of dormant AP conduction, the mechanism of adenosine-induced AP conduction was determined to be caused by AP excitability recovery in ≥ 12 (92%) cases. The presence of dormant AP conduction was a significant predictor of chronic recurrent AP conduction requiring repeat ablation (odds ratio, 8.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-66.9; P=0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Adenosine can unmask dormant AP conduction after catheter ablation. Direct effects of adenosine on the AP, possibly via AP membrane potential hyperpolarization, are the dominant mechanism of adenosine-induced AP conduction after ablation. Dormant AP conduction is associated with higher rates of recurrent AP conduction requiring repeat ablation.

Pulmonary vein isolation using "contact force" ablation: the effect on dormant conduction and long-term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation--a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is associated with PV to left atrium reconduction. Effective lesion creation necessitates adequate contact force between the ablation catheter and myocardium.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to study the utility of contact force-guided ablation on immediate and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients with highly symptomatic paroxysmal AF underwent wide circumferential PVI using an irrigated-tip radiofrequency catheter. In 25 patients, ablation was guided by real-time contact force measurements (CF group; SmartTouch, Biosense Webster). A control group of 50 patients underwent PVI using a standard nonforce sensing catheter (standard group; ThermoCool, Biosense Webster). After PVI, all patients underwent adenosine testing to unmask dormant conduction. Patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months and by transtelephonic monitoring as well.

RESULTS

Dormant conduction was unmasked and subsequently eliminated in 4 PV pairs (8%; 16% of patients) in the CF group and 35 PV pairs (35%; 52% of patients) in the standard group (P = .0004 per PV pair; P = .0029 per patient). The single-procedure, off-antiarrhythmic drug freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias at 1 year was 88% in the CF group vs 66% in the standard group (P = .047). Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time were significantly longer in the CF group (P = .0038 and P = .0001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The use of real-time contact force guidance results in a significant reduction in the prevalence of dormant conduction with improved long-term freedom from recurrent arrhythmias. The utility of a contact force-guided approach requires evaluation in a long-term prospective randomized study.

Prolonged ablation on critical segments of pulmonary vein ostia in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized controlled study

INTRODUCTION

Electrical reconnection of the pulmonary veins (PVs) plays a key role in the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after ablative treatment. This randomized controlled study tested the hypothesis that prolonged ablations, on areas that may be critical for left atrial (LA)-PV conduction, can significantly reduce the rate of acute PV reconnection and AF recurrence.

METHODS

Patients with paroxysmal AF were randomly assigned to either a control or an add-on group.Ostial PV isolation (PVI) was performed by point-to-point RF ablation (irrigated tip, 30 Watts, 30 seconds).An ostial segment was assumed to be critical for LA-PV connection if any of the following reactions occurred during RF application: (1) sudden delay of LA-PV conduction, (2) change of activation sequence,and (3) PVI. In this case, RF application was prolonged from 30 seconds to 90 seconds in the add-on group only.

RESULTS

A total of 131 patients (58 ± 11 years, 47 female) were assigned to a control (n = 64) and an add-on (n = 67) group. Ablation time was longer in the add-on (48 ± 16 minutes vs 37 ± 15 minutes, P = 0.03). Acute PV reconnection was observed in 20 of 64 controls and in eight of 66 add-on patients (31% vs 12%, P < 0.001). During a follow-up of 26 months, AF recurred in 33 of 64 controls and in 16 of 66 add-on patients (52% vs 24%, P = 0.001) after a single ablation procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged radiofrequency application on critical segments of LA-PV connection is a safe and effective ablative strategy that significantly reduces acute PV reconnection and AF recurrence rates after a single ablation procedure for paroxysmal AF.

How To Achieve Durable Pulmonary Vein Antral Isolation?

The inability to achieve durable pulmonary vein isolation(PVI) remains a major limitation to a catheter ablation for thew treatment of atrial fibrillation(AF), potentially resulting in AF recurrence.In this review,we discuss the research performed investigating methods to improve lesion permanence for the goal of durable PVI.Investigations evaluted procedural techniques,various catheres utilized, adjunctive pharamacologic therapy and novel energy sources designed to improve ablation lesion permanence are discussed.

Acute pulmonary vein reconnection is a predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation

PURPOSE

Arrhythmia recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) occurs predominantly due to the reconnection of previously isolated pulmonary veins (PVs). The prognostic implications of detection and treatment of acute PV reconnection are not well understood. We aim to examine the prognostic significance of acute PV reconnection on arrhythmia recurrence at 1 year following PVI.

METHODS

This prospective study included 44 patients (22 men, 60 ± 7 years) who underwent index PVI procedure for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Acute PV reconnection and/or dormant PV conduction were assessed sequentially in response to a 30-min waiting period, intravenous isoproterenol infusion and/or adenosine. All cases of acute PV reconnection and/or dormant conduction were successfully targeted with additional ablation.

RESULTS

Freedom from AF at 1 year was 75 % (83.3 % in paroxysmal and 65 % in persistent AF, p = ns). Acute PV reconnection and/or dormant conduction were evident in 16 of 44 patients (36.3 %). AF recurrence was documented in eight of 16 patients with, but only in three of 28 patients without acute reconnection (p = 0.009). Three patients underwent a redo procedure, all from the group of patients with acute PV reconnection. In a multivariate model, acute PV reconnection was a strong independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrence (hazards ratio [HR], 6.36; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.12-31.6).

CONCLUSION

Identification of acute PV reconnection, even when successfully targeted, is a strong predictor of arrhythmia recurrence following PVI.

Improving ablation strategies for the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. The contemporary management of AF is centered on symptomatic improvement, as well as reduction in the AF associated morbidity and mortality. For many highly symptomatic patients catheter ablation offers an efficacious means to maintaining sinus rhythm when antiarrhythmic drugs have been ineffective, are contraindicated or cannot be tolerated. Over the past 15 years, catheter ablation has moved from an 'experimental therapy' to the standard of care for the maintenance of sinus rhythm. Unfortunately, while the results of ablation are unequivocally superior to medical therapy, recognized limitations of the contemporary AF ablation procedures have spurred several developments designed to improve the efficacy of the index ablation procedure, while limiting adverse events. The purpose of this review is to discuss the procedural refinements, and technological innovations proposed to outcomes of patients undergoing a percutaneous catheter ablation procedure for AF.

Adenosine-induced pulmonary vein ectopy as a predictor of recurrent atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

Adenosine can unmask dormant pulmonary vein (PV) conduction after PV isolation. Adenosine can also induce ectopy in electrically silent PVs after isolation, possibly via activation of autonomic triggers. We sought to identify the implications of adenosine-induced PV ectopy for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after PV isolation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 152 patients (age, 60±11 years; 63% paroxysmal AF) undergoing PV isolation for AF were studied. After each PV was isolated, adenosine was administered and the presence of adenosine-induced PV reconnection and PV ectopy were recorded. Dormant conduction was targeted with additional ablation. Adenosine-induced PV ectopy was seen in 45 (30%) patients, and dormant conduction was seen in 44 (29%) patients. After a median follow-up of 374 days, 48 (32%) patients had recurrent AF after a single ablation procedure. Rates of freedom from AF among patients with adenosine-induced PV ectopy were significantly lower than patients without adenosine-induced PV ectopy (63% versus 76% at 1 year; log rank, 0.014). Rates of freedom from AF among patients with dormant conduction were also lower than patients without dormant conduction (64% versus 76% at 1 year; log rank, 0.062). With multivariate analysis, adenosine-induced PV ectopy was found to be the only independent predictor of AF after PV isolation (hazard ratio, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-3.40; P=0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Adenosine-induced PV ectopy is a predictor of recurrent AF after PV isolation and may be a marker of increased susceptibility to autonomic triggers of AF.

Pulmonary vein isolation using a pace-capture-guided versus an adenosine-guided approach: effect on dormant conduction and long-term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation--a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is associated with PV to left atrium reconduction. We prospectively studied the use of 2 procedural techniques designed to facilitate identification of residual gaps within the index ablation line.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After wide circumferential PV isolation, 40 patients received additional ablation targeted at locations of left atrial capture during high-output pacing (pace-capture group), while 40 patients underwent adenosine testing with targeted ablation at sites of dormant conduction (adenosine group). Patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months. After PV isolation, high-output pace-capture was documented in 39 PVs (25%; 50% of patients) in the pace-capture group. Dormant conduction was unmasked in 34 PVs (22%; 53% of patients) in the adenosine group. A subset of 25 patients in the pace-capture group underwent adenosine testing without targeted ablation of dormant conduction. In these patients, only 10 out of 86 PVs (11.6%; 24% of patients) demonstrated dormant conduction after the elimination of local pace-capture. At a follow-up of 329±124 days, the single procedure off antiarrhythmic drug freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation was 67.5% in the adenosine group and 65.0% in the pace-capture group (P=0.814). Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time were significantly longer in the pace-capture group (P=0.002 and P<0.001), whereas radiofrequency ablation time was comparable (P=0.192).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of high-output pacing post-PV isolation results in a significant reduction in the incidence of dormant conduction with a comparable long-term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation (versus adenosine-guided ablation). The use of these approaches requires evaluation in a long-term prospective randomized study. [corrected].

Long-term results of pulmonary vein antrum isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis in regards to substrates and pulmonary vein reconnections

AIMS

To examine the impact of left atrial (LA) low-voltage zones (LVZs) on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) without LA substrate modification.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy-six patients with AF (paroxysmal/persistent 65/11) were prospectively enroled. Left atrial voltage maps were constructed during sinus rhythm using NavX to identify LVZs (<0.5 mV), and PVAI without any LA substrate modification was performed using an open-irrigation catheter. After PVAI, 20 mg of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) was injected. Adenosine triphosphate-induced PV reconnections were eliminated by touch-up ablation when unmasked. Voltage maps revealed LVZs in 24 patients (32%) and no LVZs in 52 (68%). During 24 ± 7 months of follow-up, 15 patients (63%) with LVZs and 10 (19%) without had AF recurrences off antiarrhythmic drugs (log-rank P < 0.001). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that LVZ areas [odds ratio (OR): 1.12 per 1 cm(2), 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.23, P = 0.001] and ATP-induced reconnection (OR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.01-4.91, P = 0.046) were significant predictors of recurrence. In those with LVZs, the LVZ area was strongly correlated with the LA body volume (r = 0.81, P < 0.001) and a unique predictor of recurrence (OR: 1.17 per 1 cm(2), 95% CI: 1.01-1.55, P = 0.031), while in those without an LVZ, ATP-induced PV reconnection was a unique predictor (OR: 3.24, 95% CI: 1.15-15.39, P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

The LVZ area was an independent predictor of recurrence after PVAI without any LA substrate modification. Adenosine triphosphate-induced PV reconnection was also an independent predictor, especially in those without LVZs.

Corticosteroid use during pulmonary vein isolation is associated with a higher prevalence of dormant pulmonary vein conduction

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is associated with PV to left atrium reconduction.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to prospectively determine if the use of intraprocedural corticosteroids to limit the extent of tissue edema and/or inflammation alters the prevalence of spontaneous and adenosine-induced acute PV reconnection after PVI.

METHODS

Prior to wide circumferential PVI, 45 patients received a single intravenous (IV) bolus of hydrocortisone 250 mg immediately after transseptal access (steroid group). Another 45 consecutive patients underwent standard PVI without IV hydrocortisone (nonsteroid group). After PVI, all patients underwent adenosine testing to unmask dormant conduction. Patients were followed at 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Dormant conduction was unmasked in a significantly higher proportion of PVs in the steroid group compared with the nonsteroid group (32.8% of PVs [60/183] vs 21.1% of PVs [37/175], P = .03). On multivariate generalized estimating equation analysis, steroid use remained independently associated with dormant PV conduction (P = .03). There was no difference in the segmental distribution of reconnection between the 2 groups. The 1-year freedom from recurrent AF did not differ between groups (P = .37). Radiofrequency time was significantly longer in the steroid group (58 ± 21 minutes vs 48 ± 18 minutes, P <.01), whereas procedure duration and fluoroscopy time were comparable (P = .55 and P = .44, respectively).

CONCLUSION

A single bolus of hydrocortisone 250 mg IV prior to PVI results in greater radiofrequency requirements for PVI and a higher prevalence of dormant PV conduction unmasked by adenosine. The utility of these approaches requires evaluation in a long-term prospective randomized study.

Adenosine testing in atrial flutter ablation: unmasking of dormant conduction across the cavotricuspid isthmus and risk of recurrence

BACKGROUND

Adenosine-induced hyperpolarization may identify pulmonary veins at risk of reconnection following electrical isolation for atrial fibrillation. The potential role of adenosine testing in other arrhythmic substrates, such as cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter, remains unclear. We assessed whether dormant conduction across the CTI may be revealed by adenosine after ablation-induced bidirectional block, and its association with recurrent flutter.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients undergoing catheter ablation for CTI-dependent flutter were prospectively studied. After confirming bidirectional block across the CTI by standard pacing maneuvers, adenosine (≥ 12 mg IV) was administered to assess resumption of conduction, followed by isoproterenol (ISP) bolus. Further CTI ablation was performed for persistent (but not transient) resumption of conduction. Bidirectional block across the CTI was achieved in all 81 patients (63 males), age 61.2 ± 11.0 years. The trans-CTI time increased from 71.9 ± 18.1 milliseconds preablation to 166.2 ± 26.4 milliseconds postablation. Adenosine elicited resumption of conduction across the CTI in 7 patients (8.6%), 2 of whom had transient recovery. No additional patient with dormant conduction was identified by ISP. Over a follow-up of 11.8 ± 8.0 months, atrial flutter recurred in 4 (4.9%) patients, 3/7(42.9%) with a positive adenosine challenge versus 1/74 (1.3%) with a negative response, P = 0.0016 (relative risk 31.7).

CONCLUSION

Adenosine challenge following atrial flutter ablation provoked transient or persistent resumption of conduction across the CTI in almost 9% of patients and identified a subgroup at higher risk of flutter recurrence. It remains to be determined whether additional ablation guided by adenosine testing during the index procedure may further improve procedural outcomes.