Low Rate of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Verified by Implantable Loop Recorder Monitoring Following a Convergent Epicardial and Endocardial Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Long-Term Outcomes after Convergent Procedure for Atrial Fibrillation

Background: The aim of this single-center retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes after the convergent procedure (CP) for treatment of AF. Methods: We analyzed the outcomes of patients that underwent CP from January 2009 until July 2020. A total of 119 patients with paroxysmal AF (23.5%), persistent AF (5.9%), or long-standing persistent AF (70.6%) that attended long-term follow-up were included. The outcomes were assessed 1 year after the CP and at long-term follow-up. At the 1-year follow-up, rhythm and AF burden were assessed for patients with an implantable loop recorder (61.2%). For others, rhythm was assessed by clinical presentation and 12-lead ECG. At long-term follow-up, patients with sinus rhythm (SR) or an unclear history were assessed with a 7-day Holter ECG monitor, and AF burden was determined. Long-term success was defined as freedom from AF/atrial flutter (AFL) with SR on a 12-lead ECG and AF/AFL burden < 1% on the 7-day Holter ECG. Results: At 1-year follow-up, 91.4% of patients had SR and 76.1% of patients had AF/AFL burden < 1%. At long-term follow-up (8.3 ± 2.8 years), 65.5% of patients had SR and 53.8% of patients had AF/AFL burden < 1% on the 7-day Holter ECG. Additional RFAs were performed in 32.8% of patients who had AF or AFL burden < 1%. At long-term follow-up, age, body mass index, and left atrial volume index were associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence. Conclusions: CP resulted in high long-term probability of SR maintenance. During long-term follow-up, additional RFAs were required to maintain SR in a substantial number of patients.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Combined Minimally Invasive Surgical and Percutaneous Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Hybrid ablation is a novel therapy in the invasive management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) which combines minimally invasive surgical and percutaneous catheter-based techniques. The evidence is mainly based on observational studies from experienced centers, with success rates of approximately 70% and risks that are 2.0-fold to 3.6-fold higher than catheter-based ablation. Hybrid ablation is offered typically to patients with persistent or longstanding persistent AF which, by design, requires 2 procedures (epicardial surgical and endocardial catheter-based ablation). One randomized trial demonstrated that hybrid ablation was more effective than catheter-based ablation, but with higher complication rates. The incidence of the most serious complications has decreased in contemporary studies of hybrid ablation. At present, hybrid ablation should be performed by experienced centers on selected patients with persistent or longstanding persistent AF. Additional randomized trials are needed to define the risks, benefits, and cost effectiveness of hybrid ablation to identify its most appropriate application in clinical practice.

Updates in hybrid AF ablation: a hybrid approach to surgical epicardial ablation and cather endocardial ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common and increasing cardiac arrhythmia. AF increases thromboembolic events and hospitalizations and deteriorates quality of life. The mechanism of AF is not completely understood. James Cox proposed a concept of Maze procedure in 1987 which was based on a surgical ablation lesion for electrical conduction pathway. Although surgical ablation offers a higher success rate, it should be performed with minimally invasive techniques because of its high invasiveness. Haissaguerre et al. identified potential sources of AF in the pulmonary veins as triggers and developed the percutaneous catheter ablation as the treatment strategy for paroxysmal AF refractory to pharmaceutical therapy. The atrial remodeling occurs electrically and structurally in persistent or longstanding persistent AF, and the catheter ablation and surgical ablation have variable success rates. Persistent or longstanding persistent AF presents a major challenge. Despite continuous improvements, catheter-based procedures have shown relatively far from satisfactory outcomes and may need to be repeated to achieve sinus rhythm. A hybrid approach consisting of the sequential combination of a surgical minimally invasive epicardial ablation and a transvenous catheter endocardial ablation would be an alternative option that supplements the limitations of endo- and epicardial strategies. Close cooperation between cardiac surgeons and electrophysiologists for optimal selection of patients and management for arrhythmia recurrence seems suggestible for persistent or longstanding persistent AF.

Mid-term success rate of single stage hybrid ablation of persistent and long-term persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Single stage thoracoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a treatment method for persistent and long-term persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) offering the possibility for patients otherwise inconsolable by conventional catheter RFA. We present a pilot group of patients after the introduction of the new method at our clinical center. Patients group: A total of 52 patients aged 61.82 ± 9.7 years underwent single stage hybrid ablation (thoracoscopic isolation of pulmonary veins and box lesion followed by catheter verification of the surgical procedure effectivness) for symptomatic persistent and long-term persistent AF with significantly dilated left atrium 57.9 ± 11.0mm in the period September 2016-March 2019.

RESULTS

The median duration of the procedure was 232 minutes and the median duration of hospitalization was 10 days. At discharge, 52 patients (100%) had sinus rhythm. 48 of 52 patients (92.3%) had a 6-month follow-up. 41 of 48 (85.4%) and 38 of 44 (86.4%) of patients were AF free at 3-month and 6-month follow-up, respectively. Acute complications were: one left atrial perforation resolved successfully by suture and one transient ischaemic attack without permanent sequelae. Late complications involved one massive pulmonary embolization and an atrioesophageal fistula. There was no periprocedural myocardial infarction or stroke with permanent sequelae.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid thoracoscopic-catheter ablation performed during one procedure is an effective and relatively safe mini-invasive method of treatment for long-term persistent atrial fibrillation.

Hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Both catheter and surgical ablation strategies offer effective treatments of atrial fibrillation (AF). The hybrid (joint surgical and catheter) ablation for AF is an emerging rhythm control strategy. We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of hybrid ablation of AF.

Methods

Systematic review and meta-analysis interrogating PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from January 1, 1991, to November 30, 2017, using the following search terms: “Cox-maze,” “mini-maze,” “ablation methods (including radiofrequency, cryoablation, cryomaze),” and “surgery.” Included studies required ablation procedures to be hybrid and report rhythm follow-up.

Results

We included 925 patients with AF (38% persistent, 51% longstanding persistent) from 22 single-center studies (mean follow-up of 19 months). The surgical lesion set consisted of pulmonary vein isolation (n = 11) or box lesion (n = 11) with variable additional linear ablation. This was followed by sequential (n = 9), staged (n = 9), or combination (n = 4) catheter-based ablation to ensure isolation of pulmonary veins and to facilitate additional ablation or consolidation of surgically ablated lines. Overall, sinus rhythm maintenance was 79.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72.4-85.7] and 70.7% (95% CI, 62.2-78.7) with and without antiarrhythmic drugs, respectively at 19 ± 25 (range, 6-128) months. The use of the bipolar AtriCure Synergy system and left atrial appendage exclusion conferred superior rhythm outcome without antiarrhythmic drugs (P ≤ .01). The overall complication rate was 6.5% (95% CI, 3.4-10.2): mortality 0.2% (95% CI, 0-0.9); stroke 0.3% (95% CI, 0-1.1); reoperation for bleeding 1.6% (95% CI, 0.6-3.0); permanent pacing ~0% (95% CI, 0-0.5); conversion to sternotomy 0.3% (95% CI, 0-1.1); atrioesophageal fistula ~0% (95% CI, 0-0.5); and phrenic nerve injury 0.3% (95% CI, 0-1.1).

Conclusions

Hybrid ablation therapy for AF demonstrates favorable rhythm outcome with acceptable complication rates.

Real-world Adoption of Smartphone-based Remote Monitoring Using the Confirm Rx™ Insertable Cardiac Monitor

While previous generations of insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) required a bedside monitor for remote monitoring (RM), the Confirm Rx™ ICM (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) utilizes Bluetooth^®, Wi-Fi/cellular technology, and a smart device to connect to the RM system. We aimed to characterize compliance, connectivity, and event transmission timing with the Confirm Rx™ ICM RM system. The study cohort included American patients who received the Confirm Rx™ ICM with SharpSense™ technology within three months of release (May–July 2019). Compliance with RM was quantified as the proportion of patients registering the patient app on their smart device and transmitting at least once. Connectivity was measured as the median number of days between consecutive transmissions per patient. Event transmission time was measured from episode detection to availability on the Merlin.net™ RM system (Abbott). Time from transmission until review by a clinician was examined. Values for device connectivity, episode transmission timing, and clinician view times were reported as median [first quartile, third quartile]. Of 5,666 patients who received a Confirm Rx™ ICM, 97% registered their patient app and 92% transmitted data at least once. Among those utilizing RM (aged 66 ± 15 years; 49% female), connectivity occurred every 1.5 [1.2, 2.4] days, or 4.7 times per week. Patient-reported symptoms were transmitted to Merlin.net™ within 2.9 [2.1, 3.8] minutes of event onset and viewed by the clinician within 0.9 [0.4, 3.1] days, while device-detected episodes without symptoms were transmitted within 18.5 [11.2, 36.5] hours and then viewed within 0.8 [0.3, 2.5] days. This real-world study demonstrated excellent patient compliance with the smartphone-based RM paradigm enabled by Confirm Rx™, suggesting the suitability of this technology for future cardiac implantable devices.

The Efficacy and Safety of Hybrid Ablations for Atrial Fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to comprehensively determine the procedural safety and midterm efficacy of hybrid ablations.

BACKGROUND

Hybrid ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) (thoracoscopic ablation followed by catheter ablation) has been used for patients with nonparoxysmal AF; however, accurate data regarding efficacy and safety are still limited.

METHODS

Patients with nonparoxysmal AF underwent thoracoscopic, off-pump ablation using the COBRA Fusion radiofrequency system (Estech) followed by a catheter ablation 3 months afterward. The safety of the procedure was assessed using sequential brain magnetic resonance and neuropsychological examinations at baseline (1 day before), postoperatively (2-4 days for brain magnetic resonance imaging or 1 month for neuropsychological examination), and at 9 months after the surgical procedure. Implantable loop recorders were used to detect arrhythmia recurrence. Arrhythmia-free survival (the primary efficacy endpoint) was defined as no episodes of AF or atrial tachycardia while off antiarrhythmic drugs, redo ablations or cardioversions.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients (age: 62.5 ± 10.5 years) were enrolled, 37 (62.7%) were men, and the mean follow-up was 30.3 ± 10.8 months. Thoracoscopic ablation was successfully performed in 55 (93.2%) patients. On baseline magnetic resonance imaging, chronic ischemic brain lesions were present in 60% of patients. New ischemic lesions on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging were present in 44.4%. Major postoperative cognitive dysfunction was present in 27.0% and 17.6% at 1 and 9 months postoperatively, respectively. The probability of arrhythmia-free survival was 54.0% (95% CI: 41.3-66.8) at 1 year and 43.8% (95% CI: 30.7-57.0) at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The thoracoscopic ablation is associated with a high risk of silent cerebral ischemia. The midterm efficacy of hybrid ablations is moderate.

Digital health solutions in the screening of subclinical atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) will become one of the biggest challenges in cardiovascular medicine in the near future. Attempting an improvement in future patient care calls explicitly for the screening of subclinical AF. Digital health solutions implementing communication technologies for the collection and analysis of digitally assessable data will most likely serve this need. Several new rapidly developing methods were introduced in the past decade. Although the vast majority still require scientific validation, the body of evidence is growing and several randomized controlled trials are planned. This review aims to give an overview of current technologies with a specific focus on mobile health (mHealth) and appraise their value with regard to the available scientific data.

Insights from advancements and pathbreaking research on the minimally invasive treatment of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains the most common cardiac arrhythmia with increasing prevalence in developed and aging countries. Pharmacological antiarrhythmic therapy has low effectiveness and is limited by its toxicity. Developed in 1987 by James Cox surgical ablation of AF called MAZE procedure was very effective, but due to its invasiveness and complexity was not widely adopted. Landmark research done by Haissaguerre in 1998 initiated a new approach for treatment namely percutaneous catheter ablation, which remains a class I/A indication in symptomatic paroxysmal AF refractory to optimal medical therapy. However, its efficacy in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PSAF) is far from satisfactory. Recent advancements in devices and techniques of minimally invasive surgical ablation show very good results in the treatment of PSAF. Current guidelines equate surgical with catheter ablation within the scope of efficacy indicating that both may be considered as an effective and safe treatment option for patients with persistent forms of arrhythmia. The higher efficacy of surgical ablation was confirmed at a 7-year follow-up of FAST trial with recurrence rate as high as 87% in catheter arm compared with 56% in thoracoscopic ablation arm. A new concept of the invasive treatment of AF consisting of combined surgical (epicardial) and electrophysiological (endocardial) was introduced in 2009. Recently experts' opinions and published data suggest that the proper hybrid treatment consisting of a planned combination of surgical and catheter ablation may give even better results. One of the most invaluable benefits of surgical ablations is the possibility of concomitant occlusion of the left atrial appendage. Recently good results have been reported for the novel epicardial clip for closing the left atrial appendage, which is placed in the deployment loop on a disposable holder.

New Biparietal Bipolar Catheter Prototype for Hybrid Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Objective

To evaluate the size and depth of linear lesions by in vitro testing with a custom-made radio frequency biparietal bipolar ablation catheter in a single-stage setting.

Methods

A custom-made catheter was created to generate linear lesions around the left atrium and pulmonary veins of an ex vivo pig. Two frames were made, 1 epicardial and 1 endocardial. A continuous copper braid electrode and an alignment system consisting of 2 parallel rows of neodymium magnets were embedded in a flexible plastic support. After 24 hours of formalin conservation, samples of the left atrium of a freshly slaughtered pig were sliced in a cryotome, thus obtaining a sequence of 100-µm thick layers extending from the endocardial to the epicardial side. After being digitized through a scanner, these layers were evaluated using morphometric computer software. For each slice, we evaluated the maximum length of the lesions, the maximum epicardial length, the maximum endocardial length, the total area of the lesion, and the total volume.

Results

Forty transmural lesions from 40 specimens were obtained. The results were the following (the number in parenthesis is the interquartile range in mm): lesion maximum length (L_MAX) was 7.297 mm (0.006), epicardial maximum length (L_EPI) was 7.291 mm (0.014), and endocardial maximum length was 7.291 mm (0.018). The total area and total volume were 1018.50 ± 36.51 mm² and 101.85 ± 3.65 mm³, respectively.

Conclusions

Our prototype showed very promising results. The next step will be to enhance the design for clinical application.

Combined epicardial and endocardial ablation for atrial fibrillation: Best practices and guide to hybrid convergent procedures

The absence of strategies to consistently and effectively address nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation by nonpharmacological interventions has represented a long-standing treatment gap. A combined epicardial/endocardial ablation strategy, the hybrid Convergent procedure, was developed in response to this clinical need. A subxiphoid incision is used to access the pericardial space facilitating an epicardial ablation directed at isolation of the posterior wall of the left atrium. This is followed by an endocardial ablation to complete isolation of the pulmonary veins and for additional ablation as needed. Experience gained with the hybrid Convergent procedure during the last decade has led to the development and adoption of strategies to optimize the technique and mitigate risks. Additionally, a surgical and electrophysiology "team" approach including comprehensive training is believed critical to successfully develop the hybrid Convergent program. A recently completed randomized clinical trial indicated that this ablation strategy is superior to an endocardial-only approach for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. In this review, we propose and describe best practice guidelines for hybrid Convergent ablation on the basis of a combination of published data, author consensus, and expert opinion. A summary of clinical outcomes, emerging evidence, and future perspectives is also given.

The Convergent Procedure: A Unique Multidisciplinary Hybrid Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

The convergent procedure is a hybrid ablation treatment for atrial fibrillation. It is increasingly considered as a management option for patients with persistent and long-standing atrial fibrillation. It consists of surgical ablation of the posterior left atrium through a minimally invasive closed-chest approach followed by endocardial catheter ablation. It is increasingly performed with concurrent epicardial occlusion of the left atrial appendage with a video-assisted thoracoscopic technique to physically and electrically isolate the left atrial appendage. This article provides an overview of a multidisciplinary approach to the convergent procedure, with concurrent thoracoscopic closure of the left atrial appendage, with an emphasis on perioperative management at a single institution. It provides a literature review of procedural outcomes, current data limitations, and future considerations.

One-Stage Versus Sequential Hybrid Radiofrequency Ablation: An In Vitro Evaluation

Objective

To compare lesion size and depth between a 1-step, a sequential, and a delayed radio-frequency ablation in a hybrid setup.

Methods

Left atrium tissues obtained from fresh porcine hearts were mounted into the ABLABOX simulator. Based on the time differences between the index epicardial (epi) and consequent endocardial (endo) ablation, 3 study groups were compared: a 1-stage (SEQ- 0) group (0-minute delay), an SEQ 1 group (60-minute delay), and an SEQ 2 group (240-minute delay). During the experiment, a constant epicardial (300 gr) and endocardial (30 gr) force were applied. Per group, 20 samples were studied, and the resulting lesion size and depth were quantified with morphometric evaluation.

Results

Overall, no transmural lesion was obtained. Lesions in SEQ 0 had better maximum and minimum diameters ( P < 0.001), a larger total area ( P < 0.001), and volume ( P < 0.001) than SEQ 1 and SEQ 2. There was no statistical difference in morphometric parameters (all, P > 0.05) between the delayed procedures (SEQ 1 and SEQ 2).

Conclusions

In our in vitro model, different time sequences of combined epi–endo ablation did not result in transmural lesions. However, simultaneous epi–endo ablation produced broader and deeper lesions. Our findings need to be confirmed by further research.

Implantable loop recorders for cardiac dysrhythmia monitoring

Incorporation of technological advances in healthcare delivery has played a foundational role in development of modern healthcare. With the use of wireless transmission in conjunction with digitization of electrocardiography, continuous monitoring strategies have redefined our approach to dysrhythmia. These devices show promising results in evolving implantable loop recorder technology. In this review, we summarize the history of remote monitoring, indications for loop recorders, devices available, evidence for specific devices and anticipated studies.

The Role of the Electrophysiologist in Convergent Ablation

Catheter ablation is a well-established treatment for patients with AF in whom sinus rhythm is desired. Both radiofrequency catheter ablation and cryoablation are widely performed, rapidly developing techniques. Convergent ablation is a novel hybrid technique combining an endocardial radiofrequency ablation with a minimally invasive epicardial surgical ablation. Some suggest that hybrid ablation may be more effective than lone endocardial ablation in achieving the elusive goal of maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with non-paroxysmal AF. In this article, the authors examine the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation and convergent ablation for long-standing, persistent AF. We also outline the crucial role that electrophysiologists play, not only as a procedure operator, but also as the coordinator and developer of this multidisciplinary service.

Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorder in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Due to limited data, implantable loop recorders (ILR) are not currently recommended by the guidelines to routinely monitor patients after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.

AIMS

To validate the diagnostic value of ILR after AF ablation, modern generation ILRs (LINQ) were implanted in patients scheduled for cryoballoon ablation of AF (CBA).

METHODS

We included 29 patients with frequent and symptomatic episodes of paroxysmal AF. ILR was implanted 3 months prior to CBA, and data were collected before and for 6 months after the procedure. The device was programmed to maximize sensitivity of AF/ atrial tachycardia (AT) detection. All EGM recordings were "manually" assessed and annotated as true AF, pseudo AF, unrecognized AF, and episodes with no EGM available. Duration and episode-based standard performance metrics were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total number of 5,842 episodes were recorded. A total of 4,403 episodes were true AF, 453 episodes were pseudo AF, and 986 episodes had no EGM available. The device did not recognize 144 episodes of AF. Duration-based sensitivity was 95.2%, duration-based specificity 99.9%, duration-based PPV 99.2%, duration-based NPV 99.9%, episode-based sensitivity 98.0%, and episode-based PPV 91.0%. Misdiagnosis happened in 1 in 10 episodes. Total data review time was 166 hr.

CONCLUSIONS

Implantable loop recorders is a valuable tool in evaluation of AF episodes in patients undergoing CBA. However, for high precision all recorded episodes need to be evaluated "manually." The memory storage space is too low for frequent AF episodes, resulting in overwriting of stored EGMs and data loss.

Continuous monitoring after atrial fibrillation ablation: the LINQ AF study

Aims

To study device performance, arrhythmia recurrence characteristics, and methods of outcome assessment using a novel implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods and results

In 419 consecutive patients undergoing first-time catheter ablation for symptomatic paroxysmal (n = 224) or persistent (n = 195) AF an ICM was injected at the end of the procedure. Telemedicine staff ensured full episode transmission coverage and manually evaluated all automatic arrhythmia episodes. Device detection metrics were calculated for ≥2, ≥6, and ≥10 min AF detection durations. Four methods of outcome assessment were studied: continuous recurrence analysis, discontinuous recurrence analysis, AF-burden analysis, and analysis of individual rhythm profiles. A total of 43 673 automatic AF episodes were transmitted over a follow-up of 15 ± 6 months. Episode-based positive predictive values changed significantly with longer AF detection durations (70.5% for ≥2 min, 81.8% for ≥6 min, and 85.9% for ≥10 min). Patients with exclusive short episode recurrences (≥2 to <6 min) were rare and their arrhythmia detection was clinically irrelevant. Different methods of outcome assessment showed a large variation (46–79%) in ablation success. Individual rhythm characteristics and subclinical AF added to this inconsistency. Analysis of AF-burden and individual rhythm profiles were least influenced and showed successful treatment in 60–70% of the patients.

Conclusion

We suggest AF detection duration >6 min and AF burden >0.1% as a standardized outcome definition for AF studies to come in the future.

Implantable loop recorder in clinical practice

The implantable loop recorder (ILR), also known as insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) is a subcutaneous device used for diagnosing heart rhythm disorders. These devices have been strongly improved and miniaturized during the last years showing several reliable features along with the availability of remote monitoring which improves the diagnostic timing and the follow-up strategy with a potential reduction of costs for health care. The recent advent of injectable ILRs makes the procedure even easier and more tolerated by patients. ILR allows the investigation of unexplained recurrent syncope with uncertain diagnosis, revealing a possible relationship with cardiac arrhythmias. In addition, it has recently been equipped with sophisticated algorithms able to detect atrial fibrillation episodes. This new opportunity may provide to the physicians systematic heart rhythm screening with possible effects on patient antiarrhythmic and anticoagulant therapy management. The use of such devices will surely increase, since they may be helpful to diagnose a wide range of disorders and pathologies. Indeed, further studies should be performed in order to identify all the potentialities of these tools.

Insertable cardiac monitors: current indications and devices

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent unexplained syncope is a well-established indication for an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM). Recently, the indications for an ICM have been expanded.

AREAS COVERED

This review article discusses the current indications for ICMs and gives an overview of the latest generation of commercially available ICMs.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

The 2018 ESC Syncope guidelines have expanded the indications for an ICM to patients with inherited cardiomyopathy, inherited channelopathy, suspected unproven epilepsy, and unexplained falls. ICMs are also increasingly used for the detection of subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Whether treatment of subclinical AF (SCAF) with oral anticoagulation prevents recurrent stroke is yet unknown. The current generation of ICMs are smaller, easier to implant, have better diagnostics, and are capable of remote monitoring. The Reveal LINQ (Medtronic) is the smallest ICM and has the most extensive performance and clinical data. The BioMonitor 2 (Biotronik) is the largest ICM but has excellent R-wave amplitudes, longest longevity, and reliable remote monitoring. The Confirm Rx (Abbott) is capable to provide mobile data transmission enabled by a smartphone app. Future generation of ICMs will incorporate heart failures indices to facilitate remote monitoring of heart failure patients.

Comparison of treatment outcomes between convergent procedure and catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation evaluated with implantable loop recorder monitoring

INTRODUCTION

While catheter ablation (CA) is an established treatment for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), convergent epicardial and endocardial ablation procedure (CVP) has been primarily used to treat persistent AF. The aim of this single-center, prospective, randomized study was to compare treatment efficacy of CA and CVP in paroxysmal AF patients by monitoring AF, atrial tachycardia (AT), and atrial flutter (AFL) recurrence with Implantable Loop Recorder (ILR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty patients (74% male) with history of paroxysmal AF were randomized between CA and CVP. Outcomes were determined by ILRs; every episode of AF/AT/AFL lasting 6 minutes or more was defined as a recurrence. AF burden (AFB) and required AF reinterventions (cardioversions and repeat ablations) were quantified after a 3-month blanking period. Total procedural (266 ± 44 vs. 242 ± 39 minutes) and ablation duration (52 ± 10 vs. 48 ± 12 minutes) was similar in both groups. Recurrence of AF/AT/AFL was more likely in the CA group compared to the CVP group (OR 3.78 (95% CI (1.17, 12.19), P  =  0.048)). During the follow-up period (mean 30.5 ± 6.9 months), higher AF burden and more reinterventions for recurrent AF were recorded in the CA group. There were more periprocedural complications in the CVP group (12.5%) compared to the CA group (0%).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of paroxysmal AF with CVP showed less arrhythmia recurrence compared to CA. In addition, patients after CVP had fewer reinterventions and lower AF burden, but more periprocedural complications.

Hybrid Epicardial-Endocardial Approach to Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

WHO SHOULD UNDERGO HYBRID AF ABLATION?: Patients with symptomatic persistent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation refractory to pharmacological or routine catheter ablation can be considered for hybrid epicardial-endocardial AF ablation. Although it seems clear that patient selection should be important when considering hybrid AF ablation for optimal results, unfortunately, available data on the outcomes of hybrid epicardial-endocardial ablation is limited. Hybrid ablation is rarely compared to stand-alone catheter ablation, the surgical approach (access site, lesion set, ablation tool) is inconsistent, and the patient population studied is often suitable for a catheter ablation approach (paroxysmal AF, minimal structural heart disease). We believe that the hybrid approach should be considered in patients who either have had unsuccessful catheter ablations or have significant structural heart disease evident by enlarged left atrial size or atrial fibrosis. These are the patients who warrant the added risk of a hybrid approach and who stand to benefit from a more extensive ablation including isolation of the posterior wall of the left atrium. Multi-center studies with a uniform hybrid ablation approach and comparison with a stand-alone catheter ablation approach are needed to help clarify the role of hybrid AF ablation.

Towards a Mechanistic Understanding and Treatment of a Progressive Disease: Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrosis appears to be a key factor in the genesis and/or perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The pathological distribution of atrial fibrosis is geographically consistent with the attachments between the posterior left atrium and the pericardium along the reflections where wall stiffness is increased and structural changes are found. While there is a wide range of complex etiological factors and electrophysiological mechanisms in AF, there is evidence for a common pathophysiological pathway that could account for deliberate substrate formation and progression of AF. Anatomical stresses along the atrium, mediated by the elastic modulus mismatch between atrial tissue and the pericardium, result in inflammatory and fibrotic changes which create the substrate for atrial fibrillation. This may explain the anatomical predominance of pulmonary vein triggers earlier in the development of atrial fibrillation and the increasing involvement of the atrium as the disease progresses. Ablative treatments that address the progressive nature of atrial fibrillation and fibrosis may yield improved success rates.

Current rare indications and future directions for implantable loop recorders

The scope of application for implantable loop recorders has shifted away from the evaluation of unclear palpitations and syncope episodes to more complex conditions. This article focuses on rare indications of growing importance such as rhythm monitoring after ablation of atrial fibrillation or after cryptogenic stroke. Furthermore, forthcoming applications in various clinical settings are described, e. g., arrhythmia detection after myocardial infarction, after catheter-based valve interventions, in heart failure, and in cardiomyopathies. Enhancement of the capabilities of implantable loop recorders could broaden their fields of use.

Staged hybrid ablation for persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation effectively restores sinus rhythm in long-term observation

INTRODUCTION

Hybrid ablation (HABL) of atrial fibrillation combining endoscopic, minimally invasive, closed chest epicardial ablation with endocardial CARTO-guided accuracy was introduced to overcome the limitations of current therapeutic options for patients with persistent (PSAF) and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the procedural safety and feasibility as well as effectiveness of HABL in patients with PSAF and LSPAF 1 year after the procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study is a single-center, prospective clinical registry. From 07/2009 to 12.2014, 90 patients with PSAF (n = 39) and LSPAF (n = 51), at the mean age of 54.8 ±9.8, in mean EHRA class 2.6, underwent HABL. 64.4% of patients had a history of prior cardioversion or catheter ablation. Thirteen patients had LVEF less than 35%. Mean AF duration was 4.5 ±3.7 years. Patients were scheduled for 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up with 7-day Holter monitoring.

RESULTS

At 6 months after the procedure 78% (54/69) of patients were in SR. At 12 months after the procedure 86% (59/69) were in SR and 62.3% (43/69) in SR and off class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). Only 1% (1/69) of patients required a repeat ablation for atrial flutter. A significant decrease in LA dimension and an increase in LVEF were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of epicardial and endocardial RF ablation should be considered as a treatment option for patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation as it is safe and effective in restoring sinus rhythm.

Hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Hybrid ablation for AF is performed in a growing number of centers. Due to absence of guidelines, operative approaches and perioperative care differ per center. In this review, an overview of findings from published studies on hybrid ablations is given, and related topics are discussed (e.g., one- and two-stage approaches, lesion sets, and patient management).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed and Embase databases. All identified articles were screened and checked for eligibility by the two authors.

RESULTS

Twelve studies describing a total of 563 patients were selected. Due to substantial differences in approaches (one-stage, two-stage, sequential), surgical techniques (bilateral or monolateral thoracoscopy, subxiphoideal, transabdominal), energy sources (unipolar, bipolar), lesion sets (applying left or right atrial lesions), periprocedural care and endpoints (monitoring, definition of recurrence), and success rates (sinus rhythm after a mean of 26 months) are difficult to compare and varied from 27 % (without antiarrhythmic drugs, AADs) to 94 % (with AADs). For studies using bipolar devices, success rates with the use of antiarrhythmic drugs were at least 71 %. Major complications such as bleeding, sternotomy, and death occurred in 7 % of the total population (of which ten complications, 16 %, occurred in the concomitant cardiac surgery hybrid group).

CONCLUSION

The field of AF ablation has dramatically changed over the past years, with one of the most recent developments the hybrid AF ablation. Lack of matching data hinders drawing conclusions and creating guidelines. Early results however are encouraging. More data are awaiting and needed.

Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the implantable loop recorder (ILR) in diagnosing atrial fibrillation (AF) and assessing the postoperative efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 32 patients who successfully underwent RFCA were selected. These patients discontinued antiarrhythmic medication with no AF recurrence for more than 3 months after RFCA, and underwent ILR placement by a conventional method. The clinical manifestations and information on arrhythmias recorded by the ILR were followed up to assess the efficacy of AF RFCA. RESULTS The mean follow-up period was 24.7±12.5 months. Of 32 patients with ILR information, 27 had successful RFCA and 5 had recurrent AF. The follow-up results obtained by traditional methods showed 29 patients with successful RFCA and 3 with recurrent AF (P<0.05). Among the 18 patients with clinical symptoms, 13 had recorded cardiac arrhythmic events (72.2%) and 5 showed sinus rhythm (27.8%). The ILRs recorded 18 patients with arrhythmic events (56.3%), including 12 cases of atrial arrhythmias, among whom 5 recurred at 9, 12, 16, 17, and 32 months after AF RFCA; there were also 2 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and 4 with bradycardia. CONCLUSIONS The value of ILR in assessing the efficacy of AF RFCA was superior to that of traditional methods. ILR can promptly detect asymptomatic AF, and can monitor electrocardiogram features after RFCA, thus providing objective evidence of efficacy.

Closed Chest Convergent Epicardial-Endocardial Ablation of Non-paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation - A Case Series and Literature Review

The closed chest convergent procedure is a multidisciplinary approach to atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment. Epicardial posterior left atrial (PLA) ablation is performed by a cardiac surgeon using a transdiaphragmatic endoscope, immediately followed by percutaneous pulmonary vein (PV) isolation performed by a cardiac electrophysiologist. Interim outcomes for the treatment of non-paroxysmal AF (NPAF) were evaluated based on peri-procedural safety and complications, freedom from recurrent AF, and need for cardioversion or repeat catheter ablation at three, six and 12 months post-procedure. A total of 43 patients (86 % NPAF) underwent the convergent procedure. Patients were 84 % male, with mean age 58.6 ± 8.7 years. Mean AF duration was 45.4 ± 40.3 months. Pre-procedure left atrium (LA) volumetric data using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) was available for 30 patients (70 %). Average LA volume was 155.5 ± 48.4 millilitres (ml); two-thirds of patients had a LA volume >130 ml. There was no operative or peri-operative mortality. Sinus rhythm (SR) was recorded at three months in 31 of 39 (79 %) patients, at six months in 24 of 27 (89 %) patients and at 12 months in nine patients. The convergent procedure is a safe and effective option for both PV isolation and PLA substrate ablation in NPAF patients. Long-term follow-up is required and randomised clinical trials warranted.

The Convergent Procedure - A Standardised and Anatomic Approach Addresses the Clinical and Economic Unmet Needs of the Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Population

A standardised treatment management approach is needed to address the escalating worldwide prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF). The persistent and longstanding persistent AF patient population particularly needs this standardised treatment option to manage their AF. These patients have underlying structural heart disease that result in increased hospitalizations, long-term medical management that increases the cost burden of the healthcare system. Approximately 100 patients have undergone the Convergent Procedure at our center since its introduction 2 years ago, as a treatment option for AF patients. The epicardial and endocardial ablation procedures performed sequentially in a single setting has shown a single procedure success rate of 80%, similar to published success rates at other centers. The epicardial posterior wall isolation silences a majority of known substrates and the endocardial procedure completes the pulmonary vein isolation, creates the cavotricuspid line and provides diagnostic confirmation. The Convergent Procedure should be considered as a first line treatment option for the persistent and longstanding persistent AF patient population who have very limited or no treatment options for the long-term successful management of their AF.

Electrophysiological Perspectives on Hybrid Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

To overcome limitations of minimally invasive surgical ablation as a standalone procedure in eliminating atrial fibrillation (AF), hybrid approaches incorporating adjunctive endovascular catheter ablation have been proposed in recent years. The endovascular component targets residual conduction gaps and identifies additional electrophysiological targets with the goal of minimizing recurrent atrial arrhythmia. We performed a systematic review of published studies of hybrid AF ablation, analyzing 432 pooled patients (19% paroxysmal, 29% persistent, 52% long-standing persistent) treated using three different approaches: A. bilateral thoracoscopy with bipolar radiofrequency (RF) clamp-based approach; B. right thoracoscopic suction monopolar RF catheter-based approach; and C. subxiphoid posterior pericardioscopic ("convergent") approach. Freedom from recurrence off antiarrhythmic medications at 12 months was seen in 88.1% [133/151] for A, 73.4% [47/64] for B, and 59.3% [80/135] for C, with no significant difference between paroxysmal (76.9%) and persistent/long-standing persistent AF (73.4%). Death and major surgical complications were reported in 8.5% with A, 0% with B and 8.6% with C. A critical appraisal of hybrid ablation is presented, drawing from experiences and insights published over the years on catheter ablation of AF, with a discussion of the rationale underlying hybrid ablation, its strengths and limitations, where it may have a unique role in clinical management of patients with AF, which questions remain unanswered and areas for further investigation.

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with an Implantable Loop Recorder

BACKGROUND

Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) allow continuous cardiac monitoring for 3-6 years and are a valuable tool for the investigation of syncopal episodes, palpitations, and atrial fibrillations as well as risk stratification after myocardial infarction. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with ILRs has been shown to be safe, the impact of ILRs on cardiac MRI image quality has not been investigated yet. Thus, we tested the diagnostic value of cardiac MRI in patients with various types of ILRs.

METHODS

Two patients with an ILR and a clinical indication to assess myocardial burden of scarring and fibrosis or stress-induced myocardial ischemia underwent cardiac MRI. Device interrogation was performed prior to, immediately after, and 3 months after cardiac MRI.

RESULTS

The post-MRI follow-ups revealed no change in programmed ILR parameters, sensing fidelity, and battery parameters. However, ILRs caused significant, uninterpretable hyperintensity artifacts in cardiac MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

Further clinical studies are warranted to investigate whether modified MRI techniques are helpful to eliminate imaging artifacts.

Safety Profile of a Miniaturized Insertable Cardiac Monitor: Results from Two Prospective Trials

BACKGROUND

Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are used to continuously monitor the patient's electrocardiogram. In response to patient activation or based on automated device algorithms, arrhythmia episodes are stored and automatically transmitted daily to the clinician. Thus, ICMs can be used to diagnose arrhythmias in at-risk patients and in those with symptoms potentially attributable to arrhythmias. The ICM described in this report has undergone a dramatic change in size and method of insertion.

METHODS

To evaluate the safety profile of the ICM procedure, we analyzed procedure-related adverse events (AEs) from two separate trials: A controlled, nonrandomized multicenter study (Reveal LINQ(TM) Usability study) and a multicenter registry (Reveal LINQ(TM) Registry) evaluating real-world experience. For the Registry we reported all procedure-related AEs upon occurrence, whereas for the Usability study, we reported events occurring during the first month of follow-up.

RESULTS

The Usability study enrolled 151 patients (age 56.6 ± 12.1 years; male 67%) at 16 centers; during follow-up, an infection was observed in 1.3% patients and a procedure-related serious AE (SAE) in 0.7% patients. The Registry enrolled 122 patients (age 61.0 ± 17.8 years; male 47%) at seven centers; during follow-up, an infection was observed in 1.6% patients and a procedure-related SAE in 1.6% patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative experience from a controlled clinical trial and a "real-world" registry demonstrate that the new ICM can be inserted with very low incidence of AEs.

Hybrid approaches in atrial fibrillation ablation: why, where and who?

Hybrid strategies involving surgical and catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) are rapidly evolving. Hybrid techniques may improve procedural success and minimize risks by combining the strengths and minimizing limitations of either surgical or catheter ablation alone. Further study, including randomized controlled trials, will be necessary to determine the optimal approach to hybrid ablation.

Rhythm control in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation: contemporary challenges including the role of ablation

Because nonpharmacological interventions likely alter the risks and benefits associated with rhythm control, this paper reviews the role of current rhythm control strategies in atrial fibrillation. This report also focuses on the specific limitations of pharmacological interventions and the utility of percutaneous ablation in this growing population of patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation and heart failure.

The Reveal LINQ insertable cardiac monitor

Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are leadless subcutaneous devices that continuously monitor the heart rhythm and record events over a timeframe measured in years, allowing for the diagnosis of infrequent rhythm abnormalities that can be the cause of palpitations, syncope and stroke. To date, ICMs have primarily been used in the work-up and management of syncope; however, their use in other areas of rhythm evaluation, particularly atrial fibrillation monitoring, is increasing. The Reveal LINQ™ is the smallest and most versatile ICM available and represents a dramatic leap forward in ICM technology that has the potential to transform patient care in a number of circumstances. Device miniaturization, simplified implant procedure and enhanced automation vastly increase physician and patient acceptance. The next 5 years can be expected to bring a greatly increased use of ICMs for disease diagnosis and management in a variety of clinical settings.

Cost-effectiveness of the convergent procedure and catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

Patients with persistent or longstanding atrial fibrillation have modest success achieving sinus rhythm with catheter ablation or rhythm control medications. Their high risk of stroke, bleed, and heart failure leads to significant morbidity and health care costs. The convergent procedure has been shown to be successful in this population, with 80% of patients in sinus rhythm after 1 year. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of the convergent procedure, catheter ablation, and medical management for non-paroxysmal AF patients.

METHODS

A Markov micro-simulation model was used to estimate costs and effectiveness from a payer perspective. Parameter estimates were from the literature. Three patient cohorts were simulated, representing lower, medium, and higher risks of stroke, bleed, heart failure, and hospitalization. Effects were estimated by quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Single-variable sensitivity analysis was performed.

RESULTS

After 5 years, convergent procedure patients averaged 1.10 procedures, with 75% of survivors in sinus rhythm; catheter ablation patients had 1.65 procedures, with 49% in sinus rhythm. Compared to medical management, catheter ablation and the convergent procedure were cost-effective for the lower risk (ICER <$35,000) and medium risk (ICER <$15,000) cohorts. The procedures dominated medical management for the higher risk cohort (lower cost and higher QALYs). The convergent procedure dominated catheter ablation for all risk cohorts. RESULTS were subject to simplifying assumptions and limited by uncertain factors such as long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm after successful procedure and incremental AF-associated event rates for AF patients relative to patients in sinus rhythm. In the absence of clinical trial data, convergent procedure efficacy was estimated with observational evidence. Limitations were addressed with sensitivity analyses and a moderate 5 year time horizon.

CONCLUSION

The convergent procedure results in superior maintenance of post-ablation sinus rhythm with fewer repeat ablation procedures compared to catheter ablation, leading to lower cost and higher QALYs after 5 years.