Upper gastrointestinal toxicity of alendronate

From pill to pain: Alendronate-induced esophageal injury-A case report and review

Background

Alendronate is used to treat Paget's bone disease, glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, and postmenopausal osteoporosis because it suppresses osteoclast activity to stop bone resorption.

Case report

We present an exceptional case of esophagitis caused by alendronate. Blood tests and other data were normal when the patient was taken to the hospital, but an endoscopic examination revealed significant esophageal redness, erosion, and ulceration, along with pseudomembrane. The patient was given medicine after receiving a diagnosis of alendronate pill-induced esophagitis based on the pathological findings.

Conclusion

This case report is a timely reminder of the importance of thorough pharmacovigilance, patient education, and smart therapeutic decision-making in the context of alendronate use. To properly treat and prevent problems with the esophagus caused by alendronate, additional research is required.

Cholesterol nanoarchaeosomes for alendronate targeted delivery as an anti-endothelial dysfunction agent

Sodium alendronate (ALN) is a very hydrosoluble and poorly permeable molecule used as an antiresorptive agent and with vascular anticalcifying capacity. Loaded into targeted nanovesicles, its anti-inflammatory activity may be amplified towards extra-osseous and noncalcified target cells, such as severely irritated vascular endothelium. Here cytotoxicity, mitochondrial membrane potential, ATP content, and membrane fluidity of human endothelial venous cells (HUVECs) were determined after endocytosis of ALN-loaded nanoarchaeosomes (nanoARC-Chol(ALN), made of polar lipids from Halorubrum tebenquichense: cholesterol 7:3 w/w, 166 ± 5 nm, 0.16 ± 0.02 PDI, -40.8 ± 5.4 mV potential, 84.7 ± 21 µg/mg ALN/total lipids, TL). The effect of nanoARC-Chol(ALN) was further assessed on severely inflamed HUVECs. To that aim, HUVECs were grown on a porous barrier on top of a basal compartment seeded either with macrophages or human foam cells. One lighter and one more pronounced inflammatory context was modelled by adding lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to the apical or the apical and basal compartments. The endocytosis of nanoARC-Chol(ALN), was observed to partly reduce the endothelial-mesenchymal transition of HUVECs. Besides, while 10 mg/mL dexamethasone, 7.6 mM free ALN and ALN-loaded liposomes failed, 50 μg/mL TL + 2.5 μg/mL ALN (i.e., nanoARC-Chol(ALN)) reduced the IL-6 and IL-8 levels by, respectively, 75% and 65% in the mild and by, respectively, 60% and 40% in the pronounced inflammation model. This is the first report showing that the endocytosis of nanoARC-Chol(ALN) by HUVECs magnifies the anti-inflammatory activity of ALN even under conditions of intense irritation, not only surpassing that of free ALN but also that of dexamethasone.

Alendronate-induced pill esophagitis: A case report

BACKGROUND

Alendronate-induced esophagitis is a rare form of pill esophagitis. With the wide application of alendronate, the incidence of adverse events affecting the esophagus has increased; however, some endoscopists have a relatively insufficient understanding of the disease and cannot identify the cause in time.

CASE SUMMARY

A woman presented with chest pain and she was diagnosed with alendronate-associated pill esophagitis by the medical history and typical endoscopic findings, thus removing the cause and avoiding further esophageal injury.

CONCLUSION

Alendronate-associated pill esophagitis relies on prevention and timely diagnosis. A detailed medical history, typical endoscopic manifestations, and pathological features are helpful for early diagnosis.

Bergamot Polyphenol Fraction Exerts Effects on Bone Biology by Activating ERK 1/2 and Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway and Regulating Bone Biomarkers in Bone Cell Cultures

Epidemiological studies show that fruit consumption may modulate bone mineral density. However, data regarding the effect of the Citrus bergamia Risso (Bergamot orange), a citrus fruit containing a high concentration of flavonoids, on bone health are still lacking. In this study, we investigated the effects of Bergamot polyphenols on the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in two distinct bone cell types (Saos-2 and MG63). Findings showed that exposure to 0.01 and 0.1 mg/mL doses upregulate β-catenin expression (p = 0.001), osteoblast differentiation markers (e.g., RUNX2 and COL1A), and downregulate RANKL (p = 0.028), as compared to the control. Our results highlight, for the first time, that Bergamot polyphenols act on bone cells through the β-catenin pathway. In vivo studies are necessary to fully understand Bergamot’s role against bone resorption.

Efficient Transdermal Delivery of Alendronate, a Nitrogen-Containing Bisphosphonate, Using Tip-Loaded Self-Dissolving Microneedle Arrays for the Treatment of Osteoporosis

To improve the transdermal bioavailability and safety of alendronate (ALN), a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, we developed self-dissolving microneedle arrays (MNs), in which ALN is loaded only at the tip portion of micron-scale needles by a dip-coating method (ALN(TIP)–MN). We observed micron-scale pores in rat skin just after application of ALN(TIP)–MN, indicating that transdermal pathways for ALN were created by MN. ALN was rapidly released from the tip of MNs as observed in an in vitro release study. The tip portions of MNs completely dissolved in the rat skin within 5 min after application in vivo. After application of ALN(TIP)–MN in mice, the plasma concentration of ALN rapidly increased, and the bioavailability of ALN was approximately 96%. In addition, the decrease in growth plate was effectively suppressed by this efficient delivery of ALN in a rat model of osteoporosis. Furthermore, no skin irritation was observed after application of ALN(TIP)–MN and subcutaneous injection of ALN, while mild skin irritation was induced by whole-ALN-loaded MN (ALN–MN)—in which ALN is contained in the whole of the micron-scale needles fabricated from hyaluronic acid—and intradermal injection of ALN. These findings indicate that ALN(TIP)–MN is a promising transdermal formulation for the treatment of osteoporosis without skin irritation.

Western Osteoporosis Alliance Clinical Practice Series: Evaluating the Balance of Benefits and Risks of Long-Term Osteoporosis Therapies

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease that requires life-long strategies to reduce fracture risk. Few trials have investigated the balance of benefits and risk with long-term use of osteoporosis therapies, and fewer still have investigated the consequences of treatment discontinuation. The best available evidence suggests that up to 10 years of treatment with an oral bisphosphonate maintains the degree of fracture risk reduction observed in the 3-year registration trials. With denosumab, 10 years of therapy appears to provide fracture risk reduction similar to or better than that observed in the 3-year registration trial. Available data suggest an increasing but low risk of fractures with atypical features with increasing duration of bisphosphonate therapy. Published data linking duration of therapy to osteonecrosis of the jaw are lacking for bisphosphonates and denosumab. Other side effects associated with denosumab or bisphosphonates do not appear to be related to therapy duration. The antifracture benefits of long-term therapy with bisphosphonates and denosumab in appropriately selected patients outweigh the low risk of serious side effects.

Synthesis of composite magnetic nanoparticles Fe3O4 with alendronate for osteoporosis treatment

Osteoporosis is a result of imbalance between bone formation by osteoblasts and resorption by osteoclasts (OCs). In the present study, we investigated the potential of limiting the aggravation of osteoporosis by reducing the activity of OCs through thermolysis. The proposed method is to synthesize bisphosphonate (Bis)-conjugated iron (II, III) oxide (Fe₃O₄) nanoparticles and incorporate them into OCs. The cells should be subsequently exposed to radiofrequency (RF) to induce thermolysis. In this study, particles of Fe₃O₄ were first synthesized by chemical co-precipitation and then coated with dextran (Dex). The Dex/Fe₃O₄ particles were then conjugated with Bis to form Bis/Dex/Fe₃O₄. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that the average diameter of the Bis/Dex/Fe₃O₄ particles was ~20 nm. All three kinds of nanoparticles were found to have cubic inverse spinel structure of Fe₃O₄ by the X-ray diffraction analysis. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy confirmed that the Dex/Fe₃O₄ and Bis/Dex/Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles possessed their respective Dex and Bis functional groups, while a superconducting quantum interference device magnetometer measured the magnetic moment to be 24.5 emu. In addition, the Bis/Dex/Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles were fully dispersed in double-distilled water. Osteoblasts and OCs were individually cultured with the nanoparticles, and an MTT assay revealed that they were non-cytotoxic. An RF system (42 kHz and 450 A) was used to raise the temperature of the nanoparticles for 20 minutes, and the thermal effect was found to be sufficient to destroy OCs. Furthermore, in vivo studies verified that nanoparticles were indeed magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents and that they accumulated after being injected into the body of rats. In conclusion, we developed a water-dispersible magnetic nanoparticle that had RF-induced thermogenic properties, and the results indicated that the Bis/Dex/Fe₃O₄ nanoparticle had the potential for controlling osteoporosis.

Endoscopic comparison of alendronate alone and the enteric-coated alendronate with calcitriol combination in postmenopausal Korean females

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This study was performed to compare the mucosal findings after esophagogastroduodenoscopy in two groups before and after the use of alendronate only and following administration of the enteric-coated alendronate (5 mg) and calcitriol (0.5 µg) combined drug (Maxmarvil, Yuyu Co.).

METHODS

The study population consisted of 33 postmenopausal healthy female volunteers, aged 50 to 70 years (mean age, 58 ± 5) without gastrointestinal symptoms and with normal baseline endoscopic findings. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed at baseline and was repeated 2 weeks later after daily intake of Maxmarvil (n = 17 subjects) or alendronate only (n = 16 subjects). Mucosal injury scores were reported by an endoscopist after 2 weeks of treatment with each medication schedule.

RESULTS

Esophageal mucosal injuries developed in two of 16 subjects in the alendronate only group and 0 of 17 in the Maxmarvil group. Gastric mucosal injuries developed in eight subjects in the alendronate group and four subjects in the Maxmarvil group; this difference was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The mucosal damage scores for the alendronate group (total score 24) were significantly higher than those for the Maxmarvil group (total score 9) in the esophagus and stomach. Therefore, this study suggested that enteric-coated Maxmarvil is less harmful to gastrointestinal mucosa than alendronate, and may improve the tolerability of osteoporosis medication in clinical practice.

The association between serious upper gastrointestinal bleeding and incident bisphosphonate use: a population-based nested cohort study

Background

Oral bisphosphonates are commonly used to prevent / treat osteoporosis. However, bisphosphonate treatment is not without risk and serious adverse effects, including upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) have been described. We sought to determine if new users of bisphosphonate drugs were more likely to suffer a serious UGIB within 120 days of drug initiation.

Methods

This was a population-based nested cohort study utilizing administrative healthcare data in British Columbia, Canada. Community based individuals ≥ 65 years with a new prescription for a bisphosphonate between 1991 and 2007 were included. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to examine the relationship between older age and the development of a serious UGIB within 120 days of new exposure to oral bisphosphonate drugs.

Results

Within the exposure cohort (n = 26,223), 117 individuals had suffered a serious UGIB within 120 days of incident bisphosphonate use. Cases tended to be > 80 years old, and were significantly more likely to have had a past history of gastric ulcer disease, a remote history of serious UGIB, and had been dispensed proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medications (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). After adjustment for confounding covariates, those > 80 years were more than twice as likely to suffer a UGIB when compared to those ≤ 80 years (adjusted OR = 2.03; 95% CI 1.40–2.94). A past history of serious UGIB was the strongest predictor of UGIB within 120 days of incident bisphosphonate use (adjusted OR = 2.28; 95% CI = 1.29–4.03) followed by PPI use (adjusted OR = 2.04; 95% CI = 1.35–3.07). Males were 70% more likely to suffer an UGIB compared to females (adjusted OR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.05–2.72).

Conclusions

Upper GIB is a rare, but serious, side effect of bisphosphonate therapy more often afflicting older individuals. At the same time, concern about potential rare adverse events should not discourage clinicians from prescribing bisphosphonate drugs, particularly in older patients who have already sustained a fragility fracture. Clinicians must remain cognizant of potential adverse events associated with bisphosphonate use and should routinely ask about pre-existing GI disorders and concurrent medication history prior to prescribing these drugs.

Evaluation of gastric ulcerogenic and healing impairment effects of bisphosphonates: adverse gastric reactions of bisphosphonate

Bisphosphonates (BPPs) were developed as antiresorptive drugs capable of treating diseases related to bone remodeling; however, they have untoward effects including ulceration in the upper gastrointestinal tract and worsen the healing-impairment action of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, prescribed in patients with arthritis or osteoporosis. We produced ulcers in the antrum by administering BPPs to fasted rats, followed by refeeding, and confirmed their healing-impairment action on pre-existing gastric ulcers; the ulcerogenic effect is due to direct mucosal irritation and decrease in the mucosal anti-oxidative system, while the latter effect is due to dysregulation of growth factor expression, such as vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor, and angiogenesis in the ulcerated mucosa. In this article, we describe these two animal models for investigating BPP-related adverse reactions, including methods for the induction of antral ulcers and healing impairment of gastric ulcers, as well as measurement of pathogenic functional and biochemical changes.

Bisphosphonates: focus on inflammation and bone loss

Bisphosphonates are pharmacological compounds that have been used for the prevention and treatment of several pathological conditions including osteoporosis, primary hyperparathyroidism, osteogenesis imperfecta, and other conditions characterized by bone fragility. Many studies have been performed to date to analyze their effects on inflammation and bone remodelling and related pathologies. The aim of this review is, starting from a background on inflammatory processes and bone remodelling, to give an update on the use of bisphosphonates, outlining the possible side effects and proposing new trends for the future. Starting from a brief introduction on inflammation and bone remodelling, we collect and analyze studies involving the use of bisphosphonates for treatment of inflammatory conditions and pathologies characterized by bone loss. Selected articles, including reviews, published between 1976 and 2011, were chosen from Pubmed/Medline on the basis of their content. Bisphosphonates exert a selective activity on inflammation and bone remodelling and related pathologies, which are characterized by an excess in bone resorption. They improve not only skeletal defects, but also general symptoms. Bisphosphonates have found clinical application preventing and treating osteoporosis, osteitis deformans (Paget's disease of bone), bone metastasis (with or without hypercalcaemia), multiple myeloma, primary hyperparathyroidism, osteogenesis imperfecta, and other conditions that feature bone fragility. Further clinical studies involving larger cohorts are needed to optimize the dosage and length of therapy for each of these agents in each clinical field in order to be able to maximize their properties concerning modulation of inflammation and bone remodelling. In the near future, although "old" bisphosphonates will reach the end of their patent life, "new" bisphosphonates will be designed to specifically target a pathological condition.

Effects of timing, sex, and age on site-specific gastrointestinal permeability testing in children and adults

OBJECTIVES

Measurement of gastrointestinal (GI) permeability is commonly used in research and often used clinically. Despite its utility, little is known about sugar excretion timeframes or the potential effects of age and sex on GI permeability testing. We seek to determine the timeframes of sugar excretion and the potential effects of age and sex on urinary recovery of the sugars.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Healthy adults (n = 17) and children (n = 15) fasted 4 hours after the evening meal and then ingested a solution of sucrose, lactulose, mannitol, and sucralose. Urine was collected at 30, 60, and 90 minutes after ingestion and then each time the subjects voided during the next 24 hours. Each urine void was collected separately.

RESULTS

Median age for the adults was 47.5 years (range 21-57 years) and for children 10 years (range 5-17 years). There were no differences between children and adults in mean percent dose of sugar recovered. The time of peak urinary recovery of the sugars was generally similar between children and adults. Sucrose urinary recovery declined with age (P = 0.008; r2 = 0.19) unrelated to sex. Lactulose and sucralose urinary recovery declined with age in females (P = 0.05, r2 = 0.24 and P = 0.011, r2 = 0.41; respectively) but not in males.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, sugar urinary recovery is comparable in children and adults. Specific sugar urinary recovery may change as a function of age and/or sex. These results need to be taken into account when planning and interpreting gastrointestinal permeability studies.

Progress in osteoporosis and fracture prevention: focus on postmenopausal women

In the past decade, we have witnessed a revolution in osteoporosis diagnosis and therapeutics. This includes enhanced understanding of basic bone biology, recognizing the severe consequences of fractures in terms of morbidity and short-term re-fracture and mortality risk and case finding based on clinical risks, bone mineral density, new imaging approaches, and contributors to secondary osteoporosis. Medical interventions that reduce fracture risk include sufficient calcium and vitamin D together with a wide spectrum of drug therapies (with antiresorptive, anabolic, or mixed effects). Emerging therapeutic options that target molecules of bone metabolism indicate that the next decade should offer even greater promise for further improving our diagnostic and treatment approaches.

[Austrian guidance for the pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women--update 2009]

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease characterized by diminished bone mass and deterioration of bone microarchitecture, leading to increased fragility and subsequent increased fracture risk. Therapeutic measures therefore aim at reducing individual fracture risk. In Austria, the following drugs, all of which have been proven to reduce fracture risk, are currently registered for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: alendronate, risedronate, etidronate, ibandronate, raloxifene, teriparatide (1-34 PTH), 1-84 PTH, strontium ranelate and salmon calcitonin. Fluorides are still available, but their role in daily practice has become negligible. Currently, there is no evidence that a combination of two or more of these drugs could improve anti-fracture potency. However, treatment with PTH should be followed by the treatment with an anticatabolic drug such as bisphosphonates. Calcium and vitamin D constitute an important adjunct to any osteoporosis treatment.

Bisphosphonate increases risk of gastroduodenal ulcer in rheumatoid arthritis patients on long-term nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug therapy

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients are at increased risk of peptic ulcers (PU) induced by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, the impact of potential drug interactions on the development of PU has yet to be determined in a daily clinical setting. The aim was to estimate the clinical important interactions for PU presented by comedication in Japanese RA outpatients on long-term NSAID treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled 196 consecutive RA outpatients on NSAID medication for at least 3 months. Potential risk factors for endoscopic PU were analyzed in RA outpatients on longterm NSAID treatment.

RESULTS

PU incidence was 31% with bisphosphonate co-therapy and 17% without the co-therapy. PU incidence was only 5% in subjects with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or prostaglandin E1 analogues (PG) co-therapy, 14% with histamine-H(2) receptor antagonists(H2RA) co-therapy, and 27% without anti-ulcer agents. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, bisphosphonate co-therapy remained a significant risk factor for PU (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.09-4.81). Other risk factors for ulcer development were advanced age (greater than 60 years) and smoking (OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.03-6.49 and OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.13-5.53, respectively.) Factors that significantly reduced the incidence of PU were H2RA or PPI/PG cotherapies (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.12-0.68.).

CONCLUSIONS

Bisphosphonate co-therapy as well as advanced age and smoking was found to be a significant risk factor in PU, while co-therapies of standard-dose H2RA or PPI/PG proved effective in preventing PU in Japanese RA patients on long-term NSAID treatment.

Impairment of gastric ulcer healing by alendronate, a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, in rats

Bisphosphonates such as alendronate have been developed as antiresorptive agents capable of treating diseases related to bone remodeling. In the present study, we examined the effect of alendronate on the healing of acetic acid-induced gastric ulcers in rats and investigated the mechanism involved in this action both in vivo and in vitro using the rat gastric epithelial cell line (RGM1). Acetic acid-induced gastric ulcers healed spontaneously, with up-regulation of COX-2/prostaglandin E2 production as well as expression of vascular endothelium-derived growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in ulcerated mucosa. The healing of ulcers was impaired by indomethacin (2 mg/kg, s.c.) or alendronate (60 mg/kg, p.o.) given once daily for 7 days, starting 3 days after acid application. Indomethacin, but not alendronate, inhibited mucosal prostaglandin E2 production. Alendronate as well as indomethacin decreased the protein expression of both VEGF and bFGF in ulcerated mucosa, resulting in a reduction of angiogenesis in the ulcer base. Supplementation of recombinant bFGF significantly reverted the delay in ulcer healing caused by alendronate. On the other hand, the size of cell-free areas in RGM1 cells in vitro decreased with time after wound induction, and this process was promoted by epidermal growth factor (EGF; 10 ng/ml). Co-incubation with alendronate (1 mM) did not affect the spontaneous healing but significantly suppressed the accelerated wound healing caused by EGF. These results suggest that alendronate impairs the healing of gastric ulcers in rats, and this effect may be related to down-regulation of VEGF and bFGF, the important growth factors for vascularization/granulation, as well as suppression of the stimulatory action of EGF on epithelial proliferation/migration.

Differential diagnosis of reactive gastropathy

Reactive or chemical gastropathy is the constellation of endoscopic and histological changes caused by chemical injury to the gastric mucosa. Its diagnosis rests on the histopathological demonstration of nonspecific elementary lesions that may occur simultaneously or separately in different degrees and various proportions. These lesions include foveolar hyperplasia, interfoveolar smooth muscle fibers, erosions, edema, and hyperemia, in the absence of significant inflammation. Their respective occurrence in a set of gastric biopsies can be placed on a spectrum of diagnostic certainty that is never absolute because each of such changes can and does occur in other conditions. Although a correlation between histological evidence of chemical gastropathy and clinical manifestations, particularly risk of bleeding, is yet to be documented, reporting the suspicion of drug-induced gastric damage may help clinicians to identify patients that might benefit from change, reduction, or discontinuation of certain medications.

Inhibitory effects of alendronate on cholinergic responses in rat lower esophageal sphincter

Alendronate is a potent inhibitor of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, but its use results in serious esophageal damage. In order to clarify the latter, we examined the effects of alendronate on electrical field stimulation-induced responses in the rat lower esophageal sphincter. Electrical field stimulation induced atropine-sensitive contraction. Alendronate inhibited electrical field stimulation-induced contraction in a concentration-dependent manner. In the presence of N(G)-nitro-L-arginine (L-nitroarginine), electrical field stimulation elicited a strong cholinergic contraction. This contraction was also inhibited by alendronate, to a similar extent as that seen in the absence of L-nitroarginine. In lower esophageal sphincter contracted by prostaglandin F(2alpha) and treated with atropine, electrical field stimulation induced L-nitroarginine-sensitive relaxation. Alendronate did not affect relaxation. These results suggest that alendronate decreases the tone of lower esophageal sphincter by inhibiting cholinergic nervous activity.

Drug injury in the upper gastrointestinal tract: effects of alendronate

Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by an increase in bone resorption and a decline in bone density, which leads to increased susceptibility to bone fractures. Long-term therapy is needed to increase bone mineral density and maintain bone strength. Safe and well-tolerated medical therapies are required for long-term maintenance. Alendronate, an oral bisphosphonate, has been used for treatment of osteoporosis since the mid 1990s; however, recent studies have suggested alendronate can have significant gastrointestinal side effects. Most data suggest that the risk of these effects is low and not significantly higher than with placebo but there are limited reports that suggest otherwise, in both clinical trials and animal studies. Alendronate continues to remain an important mainstay of osteoporosis therapy.

Protective effect of melatonin and omeprazole against alendronat-induced gastric damage

Alendronate causes serious gastrointestinal adverse effects. We aimed to investigate if free radicals have any role in the damage induced by alendronate and if melatonin or omeprazole is protective against this damage. Rats were administered 20 mg/kg alendronate by gavage for 4 days, either alone or following treatment with melatonin or omeprazole. On the last day, following drug administration, pilor ligation was performed, and 2 hr later rats were killed and stomachs were removed. Gastric acidity and tissue ulcer index values, lipid peroxidation, and myeloperoxidase and glutathione levels, as well as the histologic appearance of the stomach tissues, were determined. Chronic oral administration of alendronate induced significant gastric damage, increasing lipid peroxidation and myeloperoxidase activity, while tissue glutathione levels decreased. Treatment with omeprazole or melatonin prevented this damage as well as the changes in biochemical parameters, and melatonin appeared to be more efficient than omeprazole in protecting the mucosa. Intraperitoneal administration of alendronate did not cause much gastric irritation. Findings of the present study suggest that alendronate induces oxidative gastric damage by a local irritant effect and that melatonin and omeprazole are protective against this damage due to their antioxidant properties.

Prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a systemic disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of the skeleton leading to enhanced bone fragility and an increased risk of fracture. Prior to fracture, diagnosis is established by documenting low bone mass. In the first section of this article we review the clinical use of bone mass measurements and biochemical markers of bone remodeling in selecting patients most in need of preventive therapy at menopause. Women with high bone turnover lose bone at menopause more rapidly than those with normal bone turnover and are more likely to derive benefit from the several preventive therapies available. The second section addresses the available technologies used to diagnose osteoporosis and/or establish fragility fracture risk using noninvasive bone mass measurement and biochemical markers of bone remodeling separately or in combination. In the third section we review the several treatment options available for patients with osteoporosis, including alendronate (alendronic acid), risendronate (risedronic acid), calcitonin, teriparatide, and raloxifene, and the approaches to monitoring the therapeutic response. The final section deals with fall protection--an often forgotten aspect of management of the patient at risk for sustaining and osteoporotic fragility fracture.

Protective effect of taurine against alendronate-induced gastric damage in rats

Alendronate (ALD) causes serious gastrointestinal adverse effects. The aim of this study was to investigate whether taurine (TAU), a semi-essential amino acid and an antioxidant, improves the alendronate-induced gastric injury. Rats were administered 20 mg/kg ALD by gavage for 4 days, either alone or following treatment with TAU (50 mg/kg, i.p.). On the last day of treatment, following drug administration, pylorus ligation was performed and 2 h later, rats were killed and stomachs were removed. Gastric acidity and tissue ulcer index values, lipid peroxidation and glutathione (GSH) levels, myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity as well as the histologic appearance of the stomach tissues were determined. Chronic oral administration of ALD induced significant gastric damage, increasing lipid peroxidation, MPO activity and collagen content, as well as decreasing tissue GSH levels. Treatment with TAU prevented the damage and also the changes in biochemical parameters. Findings of the present study suggest that ALD induces oxidative gastric damage by a local irritant effect, and that TAU ameliorates this damage by its antioxidant and/or membrane-stabilizing effects.

Gastroprotective effect of leukotriene receptor blocker montelukast in alendronat-induced lesions of the rat gastric mucosa

Alendronate causes serious gastrointestinal adverse effects. We aimed to investigate if montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, is protective against this damage. Rats were administered 20 mg/kg alendronate by gavage for 4 days, either alone or following treatment with montelukast (10 mg/kg). On the last day, following drug administration, pilor ligation was performed and 2 h later, rats were killed and stomach, liver and kidney tissues were removed. Gastric acidity, gastric tissue ulcer index values and malondialdehyde (MDA); an end product of lipid peroxidation, and glutathione (GSH) levels; a key antioxidant, as well as myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity; an indirect marker of tissue neutrophil infiltration were determined, and the histologic appearance of the stomach, liver and kidney tissues were studied. Chronic oral administration of alendronate induced significant gastric damage, increasing myeloperoxidase activity and lipid peroxidation, while tissue glutathione levels decreased. Similarly, in the alendronate group MDA levels and MPO activities of liver and kidney tissues were increased and GSH levels were decreased. Treatment with montelukast prevented the damage as well as the changes in biochemical parameters in all tissues studied. Findings of the present study suggest that alendronate is a local irritant that causes inflammation through neutrophil infiltration and oxidative damage in tissues, and that montelukast is protective against this damage by its anti-inflammatory effect.

Octreotide ameliorates alendronate-induced gastric injury

Alendronate causes serious gastrointestinal adverse effects. The aim of this study was to investigate whether octreotide, a synthetic somatostatin analogue, improves the alendronate-induced gastric injury. Rats were administered 20mg/kg alendronate by gavage for 4 days, either alone or following treatment with octreotide (0.1 ng/kg, i.p.). On the last day, following drug administration, pilor ligation was performed and 2h later, rats were killed and stomachs were removed. Gastric acidity and tissue ulcer index values, lipid peroxidation (as assessed by malondialdehyde, MDA) and glutathione (GSH) levels, myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity as well as the histologic appearance of the stomach tissues were determined. Chronic oral administration of alendronate induced significant gastric damage, increasing lipid peroxidation (37.1+/-3.2 nmol/g) and myeloperoxidase activity (57.6+/-3.7 U/g), while tissue glutathione levels (09.+/-0.1 micromol/g) decreased. Treatment with octreotide prevented this damage as well as the changes in biochemical parameters (MDA: 23.4+/-1.3 nmol/g; MPO: 31.68 U/g; GSH: 15.+/-0.1 micromol/g). Findings of the present study suggest that alendronate induces oxidative gastric damage by a local irritant effect, and that octreotide ameliorates this damage by inhibiting neutrophil infiltration and reducing lipid peroxidation. Therefore, its therapeutic role as a "ulcer healing" agent must be further elucidated in alendronate-induced gastric mucosal injury.

Osteoporosis management in the new millennium

The prevalence of osteoporosis in all US postmenopausal women is 17%, and it is as high as 30% in women older than 65. All postmenopausal women should be encouraged to have adequate daily calcium and vitamin D intake, to exercise regularly, and to avoid tobacco and excessive alcohol use. Although the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis screening tools remain to be established, a rational approach based on current evidence involves using National Osteoporosis Foundation guidelines, Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation, or Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument clinical decision rules to decide when a postmenopausal woman should undergo further evaluation.

Alendronate is more effective than etidronate for increasing bone mass in osteopenic patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

OBJECTIVES

Osteopenia increases the morbidity of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). In this study, we have compared two bisphosphonates, alendronate and cyclical etidronate, that inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and have examined their effects on bone mass in patients with this disease.

METHODS

A total of 32 women with PBC were randomly assigned to receive alendronate (10 mg/day) or etidronate (400 mg/day) for 14 days every 3 months. Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and proximal femur were measured initially and every 6 months. Bone fractures and markers of bone mineral metabolism were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were allocated to each group, which were comparable with respect to the severity of PBC and osteopenia. Thirteen patients in each group completed the 2-yr trial. Both treatments increased bone mineral density after 2 yr, although the increase at the lumbar spine and at the proximal femur was significantly higher in patients receiving alendronate than in patients on etidronate. This higher effect of alendronate paralleled with changes in the biochemical markers of bone turnover. No patient developed new vertebral fractures, but new peripheral fractures were detected in two patients on alendronate and in one on etidronate. There were no serious adverse effects. Neither treatment impaired liver function or cholestasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Alendronate effectively increases bone mass and has greater antiresorptive power than etidronate in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, and is associated with minor or no side effects.

Bisphosphonate treatment of osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates represent the agents of choice for most patients with osteoporosis. They are the best studied of all agents for the prevention of bone loss and reduction in fractures. They increase BMD, primarily at the lumbar spine, but also at the proximal femur. In patients who have established osteoporosis, bisphosphonates reduce the risk of vertebral fractures, and are the only agents in prospective trials to reduce the risk of hip fractures and other nonvertebral fractures. Bisphosphonates reduce the risk of fracture quickly. The risk of radiographic vertebral deformities is reduced after 1 year of treatment with risedronate [68]. The risk of clinical vertebral fractures is reduced after 1 year of treatment with alendronate [69] and just 6 months' treatment with risedronate [157]. The antifracture effect of risedronate has been shown to continue through 5 years of treatment [158]. Alendronate and risedronate are approved by the FDA for prevention of bone loss in recently menopausal women, for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, and for prevention (risedronate) and treatment (alendronate and risedronate) of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Alendronate is also approved for treatment of osteoporosis in men. Other bisphosphonates (etidronate for oral use, pamidronate and zoledronate for intravenous infusion) are also available and can be used off label for patients who cannot tolerate approved agents. Although bisphosphonates combined with estrogen or raloxifene produce greater gains in bone mass compared with single-agent treatment, the use of two antiresorptive agents in combination cannot be recommended because the benefit on fracture risk has not been demonstrated and because of increased cost and side effects.

Bisphosphonates

Bisphosphonates now occupy a prominent position among therapeutic options for the prevention and treatment of various forms of osteoporosis. Their clinical profile of bone-specific efficacy, rapid response, protection from both spine and hip fractures in patients with osteoporosis, and excellent tolerability is all that can be expected of an anti-remodeling drug. Even in the era of anabolic agents, bisphosphonates will continue to be important treatment options. It is not possible to compare or contrast the clinical effectiveness of the various bisphosphonates on the basis of existing data. Despite marked differences in the in vitro potency of drugs, the clinical responses to each of the bisphosphonates discussed above are similar. New bisphosphonates may not be more effective but will provide different tolerability profiles and different routes of administration, thereby increasing the number of patients in whom bisphosphonates can be used. Having these effective agents challenges clinicians to identify the most appropriate patients for bisphosphonate use and to develop strategies to improve acceptance of and adherence to these useful agents.

Tolerability of once-weekly alendronate in patients with osteoporosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract tolerability of once-weekly oral alendronate, 70 mg, and placebo.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a 12-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The first patient initiated treatment on June 5, 2000, and the last patient completed treatment on March 1, 2001. The study enrolled 450 postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis (224 took alendronate, 226 took placebo) who were ambulatory and community dwelling at 48 outpatient study centers in the United States. By design, approximately half of the patients were naive to bisphosphonates. The primary end point was upper GI tract tolerability based on the incidence of any upper GI tract adverse events. Secondary end points included the number of discontinuations due to drug-related upper GI tract adverse events and the change from baseline in bone resorption, assessed by the urinary N-telopeptide-creatinine ratio at 12 weeks. A subgroup analysis of the primary and secondary end points was performed on the patients stratified by prior bisphosphonate use. The safety and tolerability of the weekly alendronate and placebo regimens were captured as clinical and laboratory adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 11% of the alendronate patients and 13% of the placebo patients reported an upper GI tract adverse event. Discontinuations due to drug-related upper GI tract adverse events occurred in 3% of alendronate patients and 1% of placebo patients. The differences between the treatment groups for the primary and secondary end points were not significant. For the primary end point, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the difference was well within the prespecified 14% comparability bound (-2.2%; 95% confidence interval, -8.3% to 3.9%). The overall incidence of upper GI tract adverse events was lower in the subgroup of patients with prior bisphosphonate exposure (8%) than in those who were bisphosphonate naive (16%). However, regardless of prior bisphosphonate exposure, the incidence of upper GI tract adverse events was similar between the alendronate and placebo patients. The urinary N-telopeptide-creatinine ratio showed a significant decrease in the alendronate patients (72% of baseline, P<.001) compared with a slight increase in the placebo patients (106% of baseline) at week 12.

CONCLUSION

In this 3-month study, the incidence of upper GI tract adverse events in patients treated with once-weekly alendronate, 70 mg, was comparable to that with placebo.

Oral bisphosphonates and upper gastrointestinal tract problems: what is the evidence?

OBJECTIVE

To review and evaluate the evidence regarding possible associations of bisphosphonate use with upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract adverse events (AEs).

METHODS

We reviewed and summarized published information and abstracts regarding upper GI tract safety and tolerability of bisphosphonates, including laboratory and animal studies, epidemiological (observational) studies, endoscopy studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The evidence was summarized by using the principles of evidence-based medicine, giving the greatest credence to high-quality RCTs.

RESULTS

Clinical reports of esophagitis associated with bisphosphonate use appear to have declined in frequency once the importance of proper administration was explained to physicians after early reports of complications. Conflicting results have been reported in endoscopy studies; some reported no significant increase in upper GI tract lesions, whereas others reported a higher incidence of gastric (but not esophageal) lesions among patients taking oral bisphosphonates. Endoscopy studies that reported differences were of short duration (2 weeks) and were not of double-blind design. Results from large RCTs involving thousands of participants detected no increase in upper GI tract AEs among individuals treated with bisphosphonates. Other studies of patients who discontinued taking bisphosphonates and were randomized to blinded re-treatment with either a bisphosphonate or placebo show that most patients (>85%) were able to continue treatment, with no difference in AEs between the bisphosphonate and placebo groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The highest level of evidence, RCTs, suggests little or no increase in risk of upper GI tract problems if bisphosphonates are administered properly. Upper GI tract symptoms are common among patients with osteoporosis. The evidence suggests that many upper GI tract AEs reported during therapy with bisphosphonates may reflect a high background incidence of upper GI tract complaints and an increased sensitivity to detection rather than a causal relationship to therapy.

Physiological and morphological effects of alendronate on rabbit esophageal epithelium

Alendronate, an aminobisphosphonate, produces as a side effect a topical (pill induced) esophagitis. To gain insight into this phenomenon, we assessed the effects of luminal alendronate on both esophageal epithelial structure and function. Sections of rabbit esophageal epithelium were exposed to luminal alendronate at neutral or acidic pH while mounted in Ussing chambers to monitor transmural electrical potential difference (PD), short-circuit current (I(sc)), and resistance (R). Morphological changes were sought by light microscopy in hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections. Impedance analysis was used for localization of alendronate-induced effects on ion transport. Luminal, but not serosal, alendronate (pH 6.9-7.2), increased PD and I(sc) in a dose- and time-dependent manner, with little change in R and mild edema of surface cell layers. The changes in I(sc) (and PD) were reversible with drug washout and could be prevented either by inhibition of Na,K-ATPase activity with serosal ouabain or by inhibition of apical Na channels with luminal acidification to pH 2.0 with HCl. An effect on apical Na channel activity was also supported by impedance analysis. Luminal alendronate at acidic pH was more damaging than either alendronate at neutral pH or acidic pH alone. These data suggest that alendronate stimulates net ion (Na) transport in esophageal epithelium by increasing apical membrane sodium channel activity and that this occurs with limited morphological change and no alteration in barrier function. Also alendronate is far more damaging at acidic than at neutral pH, suggesting its association with esophagitis requires gastric acid for expression. This expression may occur either by potentiation between the damaging effects of (refluxed) gastric acid and drug or by acid-induced conversion of the drug to a more toxic form.

Osteoporosis in elderly: prevention and treatment

Osteoporosis is a major clinical problem in older women and men. Almost any bone can fracture as a result of the increased bone fragility of osteoporosis. These fractures are associated with higher health care costs, physical disability, impaired quality of life, and increased mortality. Because the incidence of osteoporotic fracture increases with advancing age, measures to diagnose and prevent osteoporosis and its complications assume a major public health concern. BMD is a valuable tool to identify patients at risk for fracture, to make therapeutic decisions, and to monitor therapy. Several other modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors for osteoporosis have also been identified. Treatment of potentially modifiable risk factors along with exercise and calcium and vitamin D supplementation forms an important adjunct to pharmacologic management of osteoporosis. Improved household safety can reduce the risk of falls. Hip protectors have been found to be effective in nursing home population. The pharmacologic options include bisphosphonates, HRT, SERMs and calcitonin. PTH had received FDA advisory committee approval. Alendronate has been approved for treatment of osteoporosis in men, and other treatments for men are under evaluation.

[Ulcerative esophagitis associated with the use of alendronate sodium: histopathological and endoscopic features]

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced or "pill-induced" esophagitis may be secondary to the prolonged contact of the drug with the esophageal mucosa or secondary to the drug ability to alter the local conditions. The alendronate sodium, a bone resorption inhibitor used in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis, has been cited, recently, as one of the causes of adverse upper gastrointestinal tract injury.

AIM

To describe the clinical, endoscopic and histopathological features of patients with ulcerative esophagitis associated with alendronate sodium.

PATIENTS

Four women and one man with osteoporosis were treated with alendronate sodium and submitted to endoscopy followed esophageal biopsy.

RESULTS

The age range of the patients was from 64 to 84 years old. The patients showed dyspeptic symptoms after taking alendronate sodium during a period of 2-12 months. At endoscopic evaluation, the mucosa was friable, with erosion and/or ulceration covered by fibrin in the distal esophagus. The pathological examination of the esophageal biopsies revealed ulcerative esophagitis characterized by necrofibrinpurulent material, granulation tissue, and yellow refractile polarizable crystal. The patients' symptoms resolved after stopping alendronate sodium use.

CONCLUSIONS

The esophagus injuries associated with alendronate sodium are not frequent and seem to be associated with the incorrect use of medication. The endoscopists and pathologists should be alert to the possibility of alendronate sodium therapy in cases of diagnosis of ulcerative esophagitis in ancient patients, particularly in women. The recognition of this condition would improve the patient care.

Pharmacotherapy of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: focus on safety

The therapy of osteoporosis has made enormous strides in the last decade. There is now a range of interventions, each with its pros and cons. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation remain the foundation and have few safety issues. Bisphosphonates are widely used, though gastrointestinal tolerance is a problem with some oral preparations. Intravenous administration may circumvent this, although this introduces the smaller problem of acute phase reactions. The side effect profile of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is still being delineated after 40 years of use, with substantial new information expected in the next few years. This will clarify its place in the medical management of the menopause. Raloxifene appears to have a superior safety profile to HRT, though its efficacy on bone may be less. While none of these options is suitable for everyone, the range of available therapies does mean that most patients can find an intervention that is effective and acceptable.

The upper GI safety and tolerability of oral alendronate at a dose of 70 milligrams once weekly: a placebo-controlled endoscopy study

OBJECTIVE

Alendronate (10 mg daily) has been shown in long term clinical trials to be an effective treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. A weekly dosing regimen of alendronate is preferred by both patients and physicians, as it has the potential to provide greater convenience and enhance compliance. In a 1-yr clinical trial, alendronate (70 mg once weekly) was equally efficacious and at least as well tolerated as the 10-mg daily dose in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, despite the higher unit dosage required. We conducted a randomized, double blind, placebo- and active-controlled endoscopy study to confirm the results of this clinical trial. We hypothesized that mean endoscopic gastric erosion scores would be similar in subjects receiving alendronate (70 mg once weekly) and those receiving a placebo.

METHODS

Two hundred seventy-seven subjects (90 men and 187 women) were randomized to one of three treatment groups: 1) alendronate (70 mg once weekly) for 10 wk (N = 126), 2) placebo (once weekly) for 10 wk (N = 126), or 3) placebo (once weekly) for 10 wk followed by aspirin (650 mg q.i.d.) for the last week as the positive control (N = 25). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed 5 to 7 days after the last dose of alendronate or matching placebo.

RESULTS

The mean gastric erosion scores (Lanza scale) were similar in subjects given alendronate (70 mg once weekly) and those given a placebo (0.32 vs 0.35, respectively; 95% CI for difference = -0.22-0.16, p = 0.75), whereas scores in both groups were significantly lower than in those given aspirin (3.09; p < 0.001). Endoscopic gastroduodenal ulcers occurred in no alendronate (0%), two placebo (1.7%), and five aspirin (23.8%) subjects. The mean erosion scores in the esophagus and duodenum of alendronate and placebo subjects were also similar. The incidences of upper GI symptoms were similar in the alendronate and placebo subjects and did not suggest a relationship with endoscopic lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Alendronate (70 mg once weekly) was not associated with any increase in endoscopic lesions in the upper GI tract relative to a placebo.

Gastrointestinal Adverse Effects of Bisphosphonates

The bisphosphonate class of drugs are now utilized extensively in the treatment of patients with osteoporosis and Paget's disease. Gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects, especially those associated with esophageal injury, have been of increasing concern to clinicians. Studies in humans and animals have shown that the mucosal erosion and ulceration seen with bisphosphonates is a result of direct contact with these agents. Numerous endoscopic studies in healthy volunteers and postmenopausal women have also demonstrated the potential of bisphosphonates to cause stomach and duodenal ulcers. However, serious GI adverse events have not been noted in several large efficacy trials. Esophageal injury has for the most part been avoided by appropriate administration instructions, and gastroduodenal injury appears to be an acute phenomenon not associated with significant complications, except in certain high-risk situations, for example in the presence of existing distal esophageal disease or motility disorders, or with concurrent use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or anticoagulants. From the standpoint of GI safety, the bisphosphonates are well tolerated and not associated with serious adverse events.

Inhibition of particulate debris-induced osteolysis by alendronate in a rat model

A rat model was used to study the efficacy of alendronate therapy in inhibition of particle-induced periprosthetic osteolysis. A prosthesis was simulated by inserting a cylindrical polymethylmethacrylate plug into the distal femur of 24 rats allowing the plug to communicate with the joint space. Intra-articular injections of irregularly-shaped ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene particles of 20-200 pm in diameter were administered at 2-week intervals. The rats were randomized into two groups (n=12 each). Group A rats received twice weekly subcutaneous injections of alendronate sodium while group B rats received injections of saline vehicle only. At 10 weeks all rats were sacrificed. The distal femurs were harvested and axial sections were prepared for histologic analysis. Each section was graded on a scale of 1-4, quantifying the degree of osteolysis surrounding the polymethylmethacrylate plug. Microscopic examination showed a significant (P<.0001) difference in the amount of periprosthetic bone. Femurs from group A treated with alendronate demonstrated mostly normal or near-normal periprosthetic trabeculations, whereas femurs from group B treated with saline showed extensive bone resorption. There was no qualitative difference in the inflammatory cellular response between the groups. This study established the ability of alendronate to inhibit the osteoclastic-mediated osteolysis around joint implants.

Intermittent dosing of alendronate

OBJECTIVE

To review data describing use of intermittent dosing of alendronate.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (1966-May 2001) and EMBASE (1974-May 2001) databases to identify all information regarding intermittent dosing of alendronate.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A small number of clinical studies have evaluated the use of intermittent alendronate dosing in an attempt to improve patient compliance and adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from more controlled clinical trials and postmarketing data are needed to demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of intermittent alendronate dosing. The definitive role of intermittent dosing in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis remains to be determined.

Treatment of osteoporosis with bisphosphonates

Bisphosphonates are safe and effective agents for treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Alendronate and risedronate are the best studied of all agents for osteoporosis in terms of efficacy and safety. They increase bone mass. In patients who have established osteoporosis, they reduce the risk of vertebral fractures. They are the only agents shown in prospective trials to reduce the risk of hip fractures and other nonvertebral fractures. They are approved by the US FDA for prevention of bone loss in recently menopausal women, for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, and for management of glucocorticoid-induced bone loss. Other bisphosphonates (e.g., etidronate for oral use, pamidronate for intravenous infusion) are also available and can be used off-label for patients who cannot tolerate approved agents. Bisphosphonates combined with estrogen produce greater gains in bone mass compared with either agent used alone; whether there is a greater benefit of combination therapy on fracture risk is not clear. Combining a bisphosphonate with raloxifene or calcitonin is probably safe, although data on effectiveness are lacking.

Neoplastic and other complications of inflammatory bowel disease

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have long been known to be at increased risk of development of colorectal cancer; however, there are many nuances to cancer prevention strategies in IBD that remain unresolved. During the past year, two publications reported on the resection of otherwise typical adenoma-like masses by means of polypectomy, after which these patients were followed with continued endoscopic surveillance, rather than pursuing colectomy. Another concern in IBD is whether there is an increase in the number of other cancers, in particular lymphomas. One issue regarding lymphoma risk is whether immunomodulatory drug use predisposes to this cancer. One study of a large group of 6-mercaptopurine users did not suggest an increased risk for patients with IBD using this drug. There are a variety of nonintestinal problems that patients with IBD may confront. Osteopenia has received considerable attention in the past decade. This year, data have been published that quantify for the first time the risk of fractures in patients with IBD based on population, and these data were compared with a matched control group from the same population. Data on the further exploration of the issue of osteopenia in pediatric IBD have also been reported, as have some of the only studies of therapy for osteopenia in IBD. These and data on other extraintestinal manifestations of IBD have all emerged in the past year.

A randomized controlled trial to assess alendronate-associated injury of the upper gastrointestinal tract

BACKGROUND

Aminobisphosphonates are recommended for postmenopausal osteoporosis but have been associated with injury to the upper gastrointestinal tract.

AIM

To conduct a randomized controlled trial, to assess the endoscopic damage caused by alendronate and its effect on gastric mucosal prostaglandin synthesis.

METHODS

Seventy-six healthy volunteers age 40-60 years, with normal baseline endoscopy were randomly assigned to treatment with: (A) ASA 650 mg q. d.s.; (B) alendronate 10 mg o.d.; or (C) placebo o.d. for 14 days. Mucosal injury scores on day 14 of treatment were reported by a blinded endoscopist. Gastric biopsies were analysed for prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) concentration by radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS

Oesophageal injury did not differ among treatment groups. Gastric ulcers developed in five out of 26 subjects given ASA, two out of 25 given alendronate, and none of 25 given placebo. The mucosal damage scores for the alendronate group exceeded those for the placebo group in the gastric body but not at other sites. Injury scores for ASA exceeded those for placebo in the duodenum, antrum, body, and fundus. The mean change in log10[PGE2] (ng/mg protein) was - 0.07 for placebo, - 0.80 for ASA, and + 0.62 for alendronate (differences not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

Alendronate is associated with injury and ulceration of the gastric mucosa. This effect was not associated with any significant change in gastric mucosal PGE2 levels.

An endoscopic comparison of the effects of alendronate and risedronate on upper gastrointestinal mucosae

OBJECTIVES

The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate have been reported to have upper gastrointestinal (GI) safety and tolerability profiles comparable to those of placebo. Nevertheless, both agents have demonstrated similar potential for irritation of gastric mucosa at high doses in preclinical studies. The present study compared the potential for alendronate and risedronate to produce endoscopic upper GI mucosal irritation using the highest approved dosage regimens for the two agents.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which a total of 235 patients (men or postmenopausal women, aged 45-80 yr) with normal upper GI endoscopy at baseline received 28-day treatments with the following: alendronate 40 mg/day (N = 90), risedronate 30 mg/day (N = 89), placebo (N = 36), or placebo with aspirin 650 mg q.i.d. for the last 7 days (N = 20). Endoscopy was repeated on day 29 using standardized scoring scales.

RESULTS

After 28 days of treatment, the alendronate and risedronate groups had comparable mean gastric and duodenal erosion scores that were significantly lower than those of the aspirin group. Esophageal scores were comparable in all groups. Gastric ulcers and/or large numbers of gastric erosions occurred in approximately 3% of alendronate and risedronate patients versus 60% with aspirin. Both bisphosphonates were clinically well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential for gastroduodenal irritation is similar for alendronate and risedronate and is markedly less than for aspirin. The findings of this study, together with the large placebo-controlled clinical trial experience with both agents and extensive epidemiological data for alendronate, suggest that the risk for clinically important gastric irritation with these bisphosphonates is very low, even at the highest available doses.