Challenge in the differentiation between attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: case report with review of the literature

Evaluation of blue laser endoscopy for detecting colorectal non-pedunculated adenoma

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Non-pedunculated lesions are easily missed on endoscopy, and histopathological examination shows that some of these lesions are adenomas. Adenoma is a precursor of colorectal cancer, a common tumor of the digestive tract. This study was conducted to compare the detection efficacy of non-pedunculated lesions in the same patient under different modes of blue laser endoscopy and to determine whether the surface pattern of the sample was consistent with its histopathological results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 91 patients with non-pedunculated lesions diagnosed at our hospital between April 2018 and March 2019 were included in this study. White light imaging (WLI), linked color imaging (LCI), and blue laser imaging (BLI) modes were used to record the location, number, and Hiroshima classification of the surface patterns of the non-pedunculated lesions. The lesions were removed by different endoscopic excision methods for histopathological examination; the histopathological results were compared with the surface patterns.

RESULTS

A total of 105, 198, and 223 lesions were detected using the WLI, BLI, and LCI modes, respectively. The Wilcoxon signed rank test revealed a significant difference in the number of lesions detected using each observation mode (p < 0.01). The non-pedunculated lesions were primarily located in the rectum and transverse colon, followed by the sigmoid, descending, and ascending colon. The efficacy of LCI and BLI modes was better than that of WLI mode for detecting the non-pedunculated lesions measuring < 5 mm in size (p < 0.05). The surface pattern was not detected by the WLI mode. The surface patterns detected using the LCI and BLI modes were primarily types A and B. Histopathological results of the non-pedunculated lesions included inflammatory polyp, hyperplastic polyp, tubular adenoma, and adenoma. Surface patterns could not be detected using the WLI mode. The McNemar's test revealed a significant difference between the WLI mode findings and the histopathological results (p < 0.01). No significant difference was observed between the histopathological results and the surface patterns detected using the LCI mode (kappa = 0.57); the agreement was poor. There was also no significant difference between the histopathological results and the surface patterns detected using the BLI mode (kappa test, p < 0.01; kappa = 0.88); hence, there was good agreement between the surface patterns detected using the BLI mode and the histopathological results.

CONCLUSION

The detection rate of colorectal non-pedunculated lesions may be improved using blue laser endoscopy. Non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas could be identified more accurately using the BLI mode, which might improve the adenoma detection rate, thus indicating that BLI is a feasible option in the practical settings.

A large deletion of chromosome 5q22.1-22.2 associated with sparse type of familial adenomatous polyposis: report of a case

The proband was a 32-year-old man with sparse type of familial adenomatous polyposis with fundic gland and duodenal polyps and congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium without osteoma, dental abnormalities and desmoid tumors. Direct DNA sequencing did not detect germline mutations in any APC exon. However, using the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification method, we detected germline deletions of all APC exons. Using dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization, we identified germline deletion of locus 5q22.1-22.2 that includes APC. Analysis of colorectal tumors identified somatic APC mutations in the cluster region in all polyps, but no loss of heterozygosity was detected in any polyp.

The growing complexity of the intestinal polyposis syndromes

Familial adenomatous polyposis has been the first form of inherited intestinal polyposis to be recognized. For a long time it has been considered the main polyposis syndrome, associated with an easily recognizable phenotype, with a marginal role attributed to a few very rare hamartomatous conditions. More recently, it has been gradually demonstrated that the intestinal polyposes encompass a range of conditions within a wide spectrum of disease severity, polyp histology, and extraintestinal manifestations. A growing number of genes and phenotypes has been identified, and heterogeneity of somatic molecular pathways underlying epithelial transformation in different syndromes and associated tumors has been documented. Increasing knowledge on the molecular bases and more widespread use of genetic tests has shown phenotypic overlaps between conditions that were previously considered distinct, highlighting diagnostic difficulties. With the advent of next generation sequencing, the diagnosis and the classification of these syndromes will be progressively based more on genetic testing results. However, the phenotypic variability documented among patients with mutations in the same genes cannot be fully explained by different expressivity, indicating a role for as yet unknown modifying factors. Until the latter will be identified, the management of patients with polyposis syndromes should be guided by both clinical and genetic findings.

ColoSeq provides comprehensive lynch and polyposis syndrome mutational analysis using massively parallel sequencing

Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer) and adenomatous polyposis syndromes frequently have overlapping clinical features. Current approaches for molecular genetic testing are often stepwise, taking a best-candidate gene approach with testing of additional genes if initial results are negative. We report a comprehensive assay called ColoSeq that detects all classes of mutations in Lynch and polyposis syndrome genes using targeted capture and massively parallel next-generation sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq2000 instrument. In blinded specimens and colon cancer cell lines with defined mutations, ColoSeq correctly identified 28/28 (100%) pathogenic mutations in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, EPCAM, APC, and MUTYH, including single nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions and deletions, and large copy number variants. There was 100% reproducibility of detection mutation between independent runs. The assay correctly identified 222 of 224 heterozygous SNVs (99.4%) in HapMap samples, demonstrating high sensitivity of calling all variants across each captured gene. Average coverage was greater than 320 reads per base pair when the maximum of 96 index samples with barcodes were pooled. In a specificity study of 19 control patients without cancer from different ethnic backgrounds, we did not find any pathogenic mutations but detected two variants of uncertain significance. ColoSeq offers a powerful, cost-effective means of genetic testing for Lynch and polyposis syndromes that eliminates the need for stepwise testing and multiple follow-up clinical visits.

Extrapancreatic malignancies in patients with pancreatic cancer: epidemiology and clinical consequences

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the incidence, characteristics, and prognostic impact of prior extrapancreatic malignancies on patients with pancreatic cancer (PDAC).

METHODS

Records from 1733 patients who underwent surgery for PDAC were analyzed for the occurrence of prior extrapancreatic malignancies. Patients' records showing extrapancreatic malignancies were then analyzed for tumor type, epidemiological data, risk factors, PDAC tumor stage, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

A total of 239 patients with PDAC (13.8%) had a history of 271 extrapancreatic tumors; 26 patients had a history of two pancreatic cancers, and 3 patients had 3 extrapancreatic cancers. The most common extrapancreatic tumors were breast cancer (56 patients) and prostate cancer (41 patients), followed by colorectal, reno/urothelial, and gynecologic tumors (39, 32, and 23 patients, respectively). No significant difference in overall survival was found between patients with PDAC with or without extrapancreatic malignancies.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic cancer is associated with extrapancreatic malignancies in a remarkable number of patients. A history of extrapancreatic malignancies does not influence prognosis and should not be an obstacle to a curative therapeutic approach. Surveillance of patients with extrapancreatic malignancies, especially breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer, could allow for earlier PDAC diagnosis and therefore improve prognosis of these patients.

Current hypotheses on how microsatellite instability leads to enhanced survival of Lynch Syndrome patients

High levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-high) are a cardinal feature of colorectal tumors from patients with Lynch Syndrome. Other key characteristics of Lynch Syndrome are that these patients experience fewer metastases and have enhanced survival when compared to patients diagnosed with microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer. Many of the characteristics associated with Lynch Syndrome including enhanced survival are also observed in patients with sporadic MSI-high colorectal cancer. In this review we will present the current state of knowledge regarding the mechanisms that are utilized by the host to control colorectal cancer in Lynch Syndrome and why these same mechanisms fail in MSS colorectal cancers.

MUTYH-associated polyposis

MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterised by adenomatous polyps of the colorectum and a very high risk of colorectal cancer. It appears to be at least as prevalent as autosomal dominant familial adenomatous polyposis (that is caused by truncating mutations in the APC gene) with which it shares important gastroenterological features. It was first recognised as recently as 2002 and its full phenotype and natural history are still being characterised. Key extracolonic manifestations include a predisposition to duodenal adenomas and cancer and a modest increase in risk for several extraintestinal tumours. Testing for mutations in the MUTYH gene is indicated in patients who have multiple colorectal adenomas or a family history suggestive of autosomal recessive colorectal cancer and for the siblings and spouses of patients with MAP in order to inform surveillance and treatment for patients and their families.

Colonic interposition in a woman with attenuated familial adenomatosis polyposis: does the location of the colon affect polyp formation?

Attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis (AFAP) is a rare but well-established cause of colorectal carcinoma and multiple polyps. The present paper describes a case of a woman diagnosed with colorectal cancer at 34 years of age and subsequently found to have AFAP by genetic testing. During infancy, the patient underwent surgical correction of esophageal atresia with colonic interposition. While she had developed adenomatous polyps in her native cecum, there was no evidence of polyps or cancer in the segment of large intestine interposed between her upper esophagus and stomach. Therefore, various environmental differences between the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract may play a role in the expression of AFAP phenotype.

Similar colorectal cancer risk in patients with monoallelic and biallelic mutations in the MYH gene identified in a population with adenomatous polyposis

A large proportion of non-FAP non-HNPCC patients with multiple colorectal adenomas have been reported to carry germline mutations on the MYH gene. Although the number of adenomas appears to be dependent on the number of mutated MYH alleles present in a patient, little is known on the relation of this number with cancer risk. Four hundred fifty-three APC-negative patients with more than five colorectal adenomas were screened for mutations on the entire coding sequence of the MYH gene. Pathogenic mutations were initially found in 74 patients without extradigestive tumors (22.5%) and subsequently in 75 at-risk relatives. Polyposis was more severe in cases with biallelic mutations. However, mutation copy number was correlated neither with the age at diagnosis of adenomas or adenocarcinomas, nor with the presence of a family history of colorectal tumors. Heterozygous and homozygous MYH mutation carriers were both at high risk for synchronous cancers (24% in colorectum and 16% in the upper gastrointestinal tract), but did not demonstrate an increased risk for extradigestive tumors. MYH-associated polyposis is a frequent inherited colorectal cancer predisposition with a strong dominance component. From age 25-30, MYH mutation carriers should be proposed an early screening program, which includes endoscopies of the upper digestive tract and the colorectum every 2 years.

Working through a diagnostic challenge: colonic polyposis, Amsterdam criteria, and a mismatch repair mutation

The two most common causes of hereditary colorectal cancer are Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). The phenotype of Lynch syndrome, also known as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), is differentiated in part from FAP by the lack of profuse colonic polyposis. Here we describe a proband who presented with greater than 50 adenomatous colonic polyps prior to developing cancer of the colon and urinary bladder, and a family history that fulfills the Amsterdam criteria. Germline analyses of APC and MYH in the proband did not reveal any mutations. Comprehensive analysis of the mismatch repair genes associated with Lynch syndrome revealed a germline hMSH6 missense mutation 2314C>T (arg772trp) and normal sequencing for hMSH2 and hMLH1. We outline evidence supporting the pathogenicity of the identified hMSH6 mutation (arg772trp) and suggest possible etiologies for the unexplained colonic adenomatous polyposis.

Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: molecular genetics, genetic counseling, diagnosis and management

Hereditary forms of colorectal cancer, as is the case with virtually all forms of hereditary cancer, show extensive phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity, a phenomenon discussed throughout this special issue of Familial Cancer. Clearly, the family physician, oncology specialist, genetic counselor, and cancer geneticist must know fully the complexity of hereditary cancer syndromes, their differential diagnosis, in order to establish a diagnosis, direct highly-targeted surveillance and management, and then be able to communicate effectively with the molecular geneticist so that an at-risk patient's DNA can be tested in accord with the syndrome of concern. Thus, a family with features of the Lynch syndrome will merit microsatellite instability testing, consideration for immunohistochemistry evaluation, and mismatch repair gene testing, while, in contrast, a patient with FAP will require APC testing. However, other germline mutations, yet to be identified, may be important should testing for these mutations prove to be absent and, therein, unrewarding to the patient. Nevertheless, our position is that if the patient's family history is consistent with one of these syndromes, but a mutation is not found in the family, we still recommend the same surveillance and management strategies for patients from families with an established cancer-causing germline mutation. Our purpose in this paper is to provide a concise coverage of the major hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes, to discuss genetic counseling, molecular genetic evaluation, highly targeted surveillance and management, so that cancer control can be maximized for these high hereditary cancer risk patients.

Germline mutations in APC and MUTYH are responsible for the majority of families with attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis

A small fraction of families with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) display an attenuated form of FAP (AFAP). We aimed to assess the presence of germline mutations in the MUTYH and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) genes in AFAP families and to compare the clinical features between the two causative genes. Families with clinical AFAP were selected from the Dutch Polyposis Registry according to the following criteria: (a) at least two patients with 10-99 adenomas diagnosed at age >30 years or (b) one patient with 10-99 adenomas at age >30 years and a first-degree relative with colorectal cancer (CRC) with a few adenomas, and, applying for both criteria, no family members with more than 100 polyps before the age of 30 years. All probands were screened for germline mutations in the APC and MUTYH genes. Twenty-five of 315 Dutch families with FAP (8%) met our criteria for AFAP. These families included 146 patients with adenomas and/or CRC. Germline APC mutations were identified in nine families and biallelic MUTYH mutations in another nine families. CRC was identified at a mean age of 54 years (range 24-83 years) in families with APC and at 50 years (range 39-70 years) in families with MUTYH (p = 0.29). APC and biallelic MUTYH mutations are responsible for the majority of AFAP families. Based on our results and those reported in the literature, we recommend colonoscopy once every 2 years in AFAP families, starting surveillance from the late teens in APC mutation carriers and from age 20-25 years in biallelic MUTYH mutation carriers.

Genotype-phenotype correlations in 19 Dutch cases with APC gene deletions and a literature review

Partial and whole gene deletions represent a large proportion (4-33%) of the APC mutations found in polyposis patients, who previously had negative test results. The genotype-phenotype correlations for these APC deletions have not been studied in detail. We aimed to assess the number of germ line APC deletions in Dutch polyposis patients, to describe the clinical phenotype(s), and to review the current literature. We screened 296 index patients with polyposis, who previously had negative test results for APC or MUTYH mutations, for germ line APC gene deletions using Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification. APC deletions were identified in 19 polyposis patients; seven had a whole gene deletion, nine had a deletion involving two or more exons, and three had single exon deletions. Most of the deletion families (83%) displayed a classic familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) phenotype (100-2000 adenomas). We saw no patients with APC deletions and a severe phenotype (ie >2000 polyps); on the contrary, two families carrying a deletion of exons 7-13 and one family with a deletion of exons 1-5 showed a distinctly attenuated FAP phenotype. APC deletions were found in a considerable proportion of polyposis patients previously tested negative for APC or MUTYH (6%, 19/296) and represent 8% of all APC mutations found at our clinics (19/242). Methods to identify such deletions should therefore be included in routine germ line APC mutation analysis. While most total and partial APC deletions lead to a classic FAP phenotype, specific (in-frame) deletions may lead to an attenuated polyposis phenotype.

Aberrant crypt foci in patients with a positive family history of sporadic colorectal cancer

Early detection is crucial in the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) deaths. The earliest detectable neoplastic lesion in the colon is the aberrant crypt foci (ACF). A major question is whether ACF are precursors of CRC, and thus, early biomarkers for CRC risk. If so, we hypothesized that the number of ACF would be higher in patients who had a family history of CRC compared to patients without. We counted ACF in the distal 20cm of colon/rectum during 103 colonoscopic examinations using a prototype Close Focus Colonoscope (Olympus Corp.) with methylene blue chromendoscopy. Each patient was asked whether they had a family history of CRC in a first degree relative, or a personal history of CRC or adenoma. Patients answering 'no' to these questions (n=17) had a mean number of ACF of 4.4; the mean was significantly higher in the patients with a positive family history of CRC (9.0, p<0.01; n=43) or a personal history of advanced adenoma (7.5, p<0.05; n=34).

Genetics of hereditary colorectal cancer

Genetic factors can dramatically influence the risk of colorectal cancer, and the molecular bases of many hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes, including familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), attenuated FAP (AFAP), and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) have been elucidated. Additional syndromes continue to be defined as new genes, including MYH , are linked to the development of colonic polyps and cancer. The risks of colorectal cancer are variable and depend on the specific germline alterations. Some mutations are associated with a 100% lifetime risk of developing cancer, while others are associated with only a mild increase in risk. Although there are overlapping clinical features in many of these syndromes, they can be distinguished by the age at cancer diagnosis, inheritance pattern, number and distribution of polyps, specific histologic features of the cancers, and the presence of distinctive extracolonic features. The introduction and refinement of genetic testing has provided a new and invaluable tool for the diagnosis and assessment of cancer risk for suspected cases of hereditary colon cancer.

Simple and complex genetics of colorectal cancer susceptibility

There are several hereditary conditions associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). These include well-characterized autosomal dominant syndromes, such as familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). A novel autosomal recessive form of FAP, caused by mutations in the base excision repair gene MYH, has recently been recognized. This discovery has provided further evidence for the importance of DNA repair mechanisms in CRC development, already documented by the involvement of the mismatch repair in HNPCC. Additional CRC-predisposing conditions, such as hyperplastic polyposis and hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome, are being outlined. Heterogeneity of genetic mechanisms has important consequences for counseling and surveillance in hereditary CRC. Nevertheless, classical mendelian conditions represent only a minor share of the total CRC population burden. Alleles of the same genes that are involved in hereditary syndromes might also act as low penetrance variants, as shown for APC 1307K in the Ashkenazi. However, the level of complexity of multifactorial CRC is such that current tools appear inadequate to pinpoint all the involved components. A combination of different strategies, including careful clinical observation, analysis of homogeneous patient populations, and critical evaluation of data derived from experimental models, along with methodological improvements in nucleic acid analysis, will probably be necessary to unravel the basis of nonmendelian CRC. Once this is achieved, it will be possible to realize the ultimate goal of targeted CRC prevention, with the adoption of measures tailored according to individual risk levels. .

Cancer genetics in primary care

The cloning of two major breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, in 1994 and 1995 and the subsequent development of commercial genetic testing has brought hereditary cancer genetics into the public eye. In addition to DNA-based genetic testing, new strategies and treatments have been developed to provide accurate assessment of cancer risk and to reduce the chances of cancer developing in the future. This increasing scientific and public attention has prompted some cancer patients and their families to find out whether they "have the cancer gene" and has placed more responsibility on primary care clinicians to identify people who should be referred for specialized services of hereditary cancer genetics.

Genetic testing for high-risk colon cancer patients

Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in both men and women in the United States and is estimated to have affected 148,000 people in 2002. The cumulative lifetime risk for colon cancer is approximately 5%-6%, and this risk is influenced by hereditary and lifestyle factors. In fact, 20%-30% of all colon cancer cases have a potentially definable inherited cause, and 3%-5% of colon cancers occur in genetically defined high-risk colon cancer family syndromes. Although the genes responsible for the cases of moderate-risk colon cancer remain to be characterized, many of the genes responsible for the high-risk colon cancer cases have already been determined. These genetic discoveries have been translated into clinical practice and have led to improved risk assessment through the use of genetic testing. The introduction into clinical practice of genetic testing for the assessment of colon cancer risk has led to more effective management strategies for patients with potentially high-risk colon cancer and has presented new challenges to the clinician because of the unique issues involved with genetic testing. In this review, an overview of the colon cancer high-risk syndromes, with a focus on the availability and indications for genetic testing, is presented.