Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of moclobemide in poor and efficient metabolizers of debrisoquine

The clinical role of genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes

For most drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs), the functional consequences of genetic polymorphisms have been examined. Variants leading to reduced or increased enzymatic activity as compared to the wild-type alleles have been identified. This review tries to define potential fields in the therapy of major medical conditions where genotyping (or phenotyping) of genetically polymorphic DMEs might be beneficial for drug safety or therapeutic outcome. The possible application of genotyping is discussed for depression, cardiovascular diseases and thromboembolic disorders, gastric ulcer, malignant diseases and tuberculosis. Some drugs used for relief of these ailments are metabolized with participation of genetically polymorphic DMEs including CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, thiopurine-S-methyltransferase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase and N-acetyltransferase type 2. Current evidence suggests that taking genetically determined metabolic capacities of DMEs into account has the potential to improve individual risk/benefit relationship. However, more prospective studies with clinical endpoints are needed before the paradigm of 'personalized medicine' based on DME variants can be established.

Pharmacogenetics of antidepressants and antipsychotics: the contribution of allelic variations to the phenotype of drug response

Genetic factors contribute to the phenotype of drug response. We systematically analyzed all available pharmacogenetic data from Medline databases (1970-2003) on the impact that genetic polymorphisms have on positive and adverse reactions to antidepressants and antipsychotics. Additionally, dose adjustments that would compensate for genetically caused differences in blood concentrations were calculated. To study pharmacokinetic effects, data for 36 antidepressants were screened. We found that for 20 of those, data on polymorphic CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 were found and that in 14 drugs such genetic variation would require at least doubling of the dose in extensive metabolizers in comparison to poor metabolizers. Data for 38 antipsychotics were examined: for 13 of those CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotype was of relevance. To study the effects of genetic variability on pharmacodynamic pathways, we reviewed 80 clinical studies on polymorphisms in candidate genes, but those did not for the most part reveal significant associations between neurotransmitter receptor and transporter genotypes and therapy response or adverse drug reactions. In addition associations found in one study could not be replicated in other studies. For this reason, it is not yet possible to translate pharmacogenetic parameters fully into therapeutic recommendations. At present, antidepressant and antipsychotic drug responses can best be explained as the combinatorial outcome of complex systems that interact at multiple levels. In spite of these limitations, combinations of polymorphisms in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic pathways of relevance might contribute to identify genotypes associated with best and worst responders and they may also identify susceptibility to adverse drug reactions.

CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotype-based dose recommendations for antidepressants: a first step towards subpopulation-specific dosages

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to provide distinct dose recommendations for antidepressants based on the genotypes of cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP2D6 and CYP2C19. This approach may be a useful complementation to clinical monitoring and therapeutic drug monitoring.

METHOD

Our literature search covered 32 antidepressants marketed in Europe, Canada, and the United States. We evaluated studies which had compared pharmacokinetic parameters of antidepressants among poor, intermediate, extensive and ultrarapid metabolizers.

RESULTS

For 14 antidepressants, distinct dose recommendations for extensive, intermediate and poor metabolizers of either CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 were given. For the tricyclic antidepressants, dose reductions around 50% were generally recommended for poor metabolizers of substrates of CYP2D6 or CYP2C19, whereas differences were smaller for the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

We have provided preliminary average dose suggestions based on the phenotype or genotype. This is a first attempt to apply the new pharmacogenetics to suggest dose-regimens that take the differences in drug metabolic capacity into account.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between fluoxetine and moclobemide in the investigation of development of the "serotonin syndrome"

OBJECTIVE

To assess the tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of combined treatment with fluoxetine and moclobemide in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Fluoxetine (20 to 40 mg/day) was administered for 23 days to 18 subjects. At (nor)fluoxetine steady state, subjects were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive in addition either moclobemide (ascending doses up to 600 mg/day) of placebo. A single 300 mg dose of moclobemide was administered before and at the end of the fluoxetine regimen to assess the effects of the latter on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of moclobemide. Adverse events and vital signs were recorded and pharmacokinetic parameters of fluoxetine and moclobemide were determined. Plasma concentrations of 3,4-dihydroxy-phenyl-glycol, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, and serotonin uptake into platelets were assessed as pharmacodynamic measures.

RESULTS

The number, intensity, or type of adverse events did not change when moclobemide was added to fluoxetine. No clinically relevant changes in safety parameters occurred. Fluoxetine markedly inhibited the metabolism of moclobemide. However, multiple dosing of moclobemide did not lead the excessive accumulation. 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylglycol, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid plasma levels and serotonin uptake did not reveal a pharmacodynamic interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination treatment with fluoxetine and moclobemide did not provide any indication of development of the "serotonin syndrome."

Therapeutic drug monitoring databases for postmarketing surveillance of drug-drug interactions: evaluation of a paired approach for psychotropic medication

The present study investigated the potential of therapeutic drug monitoring data to document pharmacokinetic drug interactions with psychotropic medication, both in terms of methodology and applicability. It focused on 105 patients exposed to one of five agents known for their capacity to induce (phenytoine, phenobarbital, and carbamazepine) or to inhibit (thioridazine and levomepromazine) the metabolism of psychotropic drugs. These patients were matched by gender, age, and monitored psychotropic medication to 105 patients randomly selected from a pool of subjects nonexposed to target comedication. Such a paired approach was shown to be effective in reducing variability for a majority of substances. Power analysis suggested that eight to 10 pairs of exposed and nonexposed patients would effectively allow the detection of twofold effects of interacting substances. In keeping with the literature, analysis of the ratios of dose-normalized exposed to nonexposed concentrations indicated that phenothiazine comedication led to significantly higher concentrations of desmethylated metabolites but not parent compounds, when clomipramine, imipramine, or amitriptyline were administered. A similar, as yet undocumented interaction was observed for the tetracyclic antidepressant mianserine. In contrast, the present study revealed that maprotiline concentrations were increased, but its metabolite was largely unaffected by phenothiazine comedication. Increased concentrations were also observed for moclobemide, but not citalopram or its metabolite. In addition to its long recognized capacity to decrease haloperidol concentrations, carbamazepine was shown to induce the metabolism of clopenthixol and possibly flupenthixol. The consistency of such a picture substantiates the need to consider therapeutic drug monitoring databases as cost-effective and reliable tools for postmarketing surveillance.

The role of cytochrome P450 2D6 in the metabolism of moclobemide

The metabolic fate of moclobemide (Ro 11-1163), a new reversible and selective inhibitor of monoamine oxidase type A (MAO-A), has been assessed in a pilot study in 2 debrisoquine poor metabolizers (PM) and 4 extensive metabolizers (EM) after multiple oral dosings of moclobemide with and without co-medication of dextromethorphan. Absorption and disposition parameters were not different between PM and EM. Concurrent application of dextromethorphan, a selective substrate of CYP2D6, did not affect the pharmacokinetics of moclobemide. These results indicate that the cytochromal isoenzyme CYP2D6 does not play a major role in the metabolic degradation of moclobemide. Limited CYP2D6 activities because of a genetic defect or co-medications with CYP2D6 substrates should therefore not give rise to elevated moclobemide blood levels.

Moclobemide, a substrate of CYP2C19 and an inhibitor of CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP1A2: a panel study

The reversible monoamine oxidase A inhibitor moclobemide was given in single (300 mg) and multiple doses (600 mg/day) to 11 male and four female healthy volunteers (age range, 23 to 27) who were either poor metabolizers of S-mephenytoin (n = 7) or extensive metabolizers of S-mephenytoin (n = 8). All were extensive metabolizers of sparteine. Poor metabolizers of S-mephenytoin had lower moclobemide clearance values (median, single dose: 16.1 versus 43.2 L.hr-1; steady state: 13.4 versus 22.1 L.hr-1) and longer moclobemide half-life values (median, single dose: 4.0 versus 1.8 hours; steady state: 5.1 versus 2.7 hours) than extensive metabolizers of S-mephenytoin. The plasma levels of a metabolite formed by C-hydroxylation (Ro 12-8095) were lower in poor metabolizers of S-mephenytoin than in extensive metabolizers of S-mephenytoin. Moclobemide thus partially undergoes oxidative metabolism by way of the polymorphic CYP2C19. A combined mephenytoin, sparteine, and caffeine test performed before, during, and after multiple dosing of moclobemide showed changes in the metabolic indexes compatible with a reversible inhibition of oxidation by way of the corresponding CYP enzymes--CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP1A2--during moclobemide treatment.

Moclobemide treatment causes a substantial rise in the sparteine metabolic ratio. Danish University Antidepressant Group

A sparteine test was carried out immediately before (n = 37) and during (n = 33) moclobemide treatment (200 mg twice daily) in 37 patients participating in a controlled clinical trial. The sparteine metabolic ratio (MR) did not correlate with the plasma concentration of moclobemide and/or its oxidized metabolite Ro 12-8095, and four sparteine poor metabolisers (PM, MR > 20) had plasma moclobemide concentrations similar to those in extensive metabolisers (EM, MR < 20). The Ro 12-8095/moclobemide ratio tended to correlate negatively with the sparteine MR before and during treatment (rs = -0.32, -0.37). During moclobemide treatment the sparteine MR rose substantially by a factor of 1-103 (median 4.7), and two EM became phenotypically PM. In the PM subjects as well as in one EM patient on cimetidine during both tests, no change in sparteine MR occurred.

The new generation of monoamine oxidase inhibitors

Irreversible and unspecific inhibitors of MAO were the first modern antidepressants, but after an initial success they fell into discredit due to adverse side effects. In the past two decades interest in MAO inhibitors has been renewed because of progress in basic research, a milestone being the finding that there are two subtypes of MAO, MAO-A and MAO-B. These are distinct proteins with high amino acid homology, coded by separate genes both located on the short arm of the human chromosome X. The enzyme subforms show different substrate specificities in vitro and different distributions within the central nervous system and in peripheral organs. In the central nervous system of man MAO-A seems to be mainly involved in the metabolism of 5 HT and noradrenaline, whereas 2-phenylethylamine and probably dopamine are predominantly deaminated by MAO-B. In the intestinal tract tyramine is mainly metabolized by MAO-A. These characteristics indicate distinct physiological functions of the two MAO-subforms. Several irreversible and reversible non-hydrazine inhibitors with relative selectivities for one of the MAO-subforms have been developed. They belong to various chemical classes with different modes of enzyme inhibition. These range from covalent mechanism based interaction (e.g. by propargyl- and allylamine derivatives) to pseudosubstrate inhibition (e.g. by 2-aminoethyl-carboxamides) and non-covalent interaction (e.g. by brofaromine, toloxatone and possibly moclobemide). The most important pharmacological effects of the new types of MAO inhibitors are those observed in neuropsychiatric disorders. The inhibitors of MAO-A show a favorable action in various forms of mental depression. The drugs seem to have about the same activity as other types of antidepressants, including tricyclic and related compounds as well as classical MAO inhibitors. The onset of action of the MAO-A inhibitors is claimed to be relatively fast. Other possible indications of these drugs include disorders with cognitive impairment, e.g. dementia of the Alzheimer type. In subjects with Parkinson's disease the MAO-B inhibitor L-deprenyl exerts a L-dopa-sparing effect, prolongs L-dopa action and seems to have a favorable influence regarding on-off disabilities. The action is in general transitory (months to several years). In addition L-deprenyl has been shown to delay the necessity for L-dopa treatment in patients with early parkinsonism. Whether the drug influence the progression of the disease is still a matter of debate. L-deprenyl also appears to have some antidepressant effect (especially in higher doses) and to exert a beneficial influence in other disorders, e.g. dementia of the Alzheimer type.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)