Azithromycin in the treatment of periodontal disease. Effect on microbial flora

Europe's contribution to the evaluation of the use of systemic antimicrobials in the treatment of periodontitis

This narrative review celebrates Europe's contribution to the current knowledge on systemically administered antimicrobials in periodontal treatment. Periodontitis is the most frequent chronic noncommunicable human disease. It is caused by dysbiotic bacterial biofilms and is commonly treated with subgingival instrumentation. However, some sites/patients do not respond adequately, and its limitations and shortcomings have been recognized. This has led to the development of alternative or adjunctive therapies. One is the use of antimicrobials to target bacteria in subgingival biofilms in the periodontal pocket, which can be targeted directly through the pocket entrance with a locally delivered antibiotic or systemically by oral, intravenous, or intramuscular methods. Since the early 20th century, several studies on systemic antibiotics have been undertaken and published, especially between 1990 and 2010. Europe's latest contribution to this topic is the first European Federation of Periodontology, S3-level Clinical Practice Guideline, which incorporates recommendations related to the use of adjuncts to treat stage I-III periodontitis. Understanding the etiopathogenesis of periodontal diseases, specifically periodontitis, has influenced the use of systemic periodontal antibiotic therapy. Randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews with meta-analyses have demonstrated the clinical advantages of adjunctive systemic antimicrobials. However, current recommendations are restrictive due to concerns about antibiotic misuse and the increase in microbial antibiotic resistance. European researchers have contributed to the use of systemic antimicrobials in the treatment of periodontitis through clinical trials and by providing rational guidelines. Nowadays, European researchers are exploring alternatives and directing clinical practice by providing evidence-based guidelines to limit the use of systemic antimicrobials.

Inflammatory and fibroblastic effects of azithromycin on cyclosporine-induced gingival overgrowth in renal transplanted patients with and without scaling: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of azithromycin (AZM) on the inflammatory and fibroblastic part of cyclosporine A (CsA)-induced gingival overgrowth (GO) in renal transplanted patients.

METHODS

In this randomized clinical trial, subjects with GO receiving CsA were randomly divided into two groups: those receiving 5-day AZM only (n = 12; group 1) and those receiving scaling and prescribed AZM after 2 months (n = 12; group 2). Both groups were evaluated for several indices (gingival hyperplastic index, plaque and bleeding index, clinical crown length) at the first visit and the 4th and 8th week in group 1, and at the first visit and the 4th, 8th, 12th, and 16th week in group 2.

RESULTS

The sample included 24 individuals. The mean (SD) age of participants was 30.81 (11.13) and 34.80 (9.33) years in group 1 and 2, respectively. Based on ANCOVA, the changes in the hyperplastic index (GHI) and apico-coronal dimension (ACD) of it were statistically significant in professional scaling accompanied by AZM group (P = 0.012 and 0.031, respectively). However, no significant change was observed in mean indices after prescribing AZM in 5-day AZM regimen group (P = 0.664 and 0.882, respectively). According to one-way ANOVA, we found a statistically significant correlation in GHI, ACD, bleeding index (BI), and plaque index (PI) accounting for P = 0.012, 0.003, 0.002, and <0.001, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that AZM cannot influence the fibroblastic part of GO in presence of gum inflammation while the therapy can improve GO after resolving it with scaling.

Adverse events in people taking macrolide antibiotics versus placebo for any indication

BACKGROUND

Macrolide antibiotics (macrolides) are among the most commonly prescribed antibiotics worldwide and are used for a wide range of infections. However, macrolides also expose people to the risk of adverse events. The current understanding of adverse events is mostly derived from observational studies, which are subject to bias because it is hard to distinguish events caused by antibiotics from events caused by the diseases being treated. Because adverse events are treatment-specific, rather than disease-specific, it is possible to increase the number of adverse events available for analysis by combining randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of the same treatment across different diseases.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the incidences of reported adverse events in people taking macrolide antibiotics compared to placebo for any indication.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), which includes the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group Specialised Register (2018, Issue 4); MEDLINE (Ovid, from 1946 to 8 May 2018); Embase (from 2010 to 8 May 2018); CINAHL (from 1981 to 8 May 2018); LILACS (from 1982 to 8 May 2018); and Web of Science (from 1955 to 8 May 2018). We searched clinical trial registries for current and completed trials (9 May 2018) and checked the reference lists of included studies and of previous Cochrane Reviews on macrolides.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs that compared a macrolide antibiotic to placebo for any indication. We included trials using any of the four most commonly used macrolide antibiotics: azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, or roxithromycin. Macrolides could be administered by any route. Concomitant medications were permitted provided they were equally available to both treatment and comparison groups.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted and collected data. We assessed the risk of bias of all included studies and the quality of evidence for each outcome of interest. We analysed specific adverse events, deaths, and subsequent carriage of macrolide-resistant bacteria separately. The study participant was the unit of analysis for each adverse event. Any specific adverse events that occurred in 5% or more of any group were reported. We undertook a meta-analysis when three or more included studies reported a specific adverse event.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 183 studies with a total of 252,886 participants (range 40 to 190,238). The indications for macrolide antibiotics varied greatly, with most studies using macrolides for the treatment or prevention of either acute respiratory tract infections, cardiovascular diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, gastrointestinal conditions, or urogynaecological problems. Most trials were conducted in secondary care settings. Azithromycin and erythromycin were more commonly studied than clarithromycin and roxithromycin.Most studies (89%) reported some adverse events or at least stated that no adverse events were observed.Gastrointestinal adverse events were the most commonly reported type of adverse event. Compared to placebo, macrolides caused more diarrhoea (odds ratio (OR) 1.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34 to 2.16; low-quality evidence); more abdominal pain (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.26; low-quality evidence); and more nausea (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.90; moderate-quality evidence). Vomiting (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.56; moderate-quality evidence) and gastrointestinal disorders not otherwise specified (NOS) (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.56 to 3.00; moderate-quality evidence) were also reported more often in participants taking macrolides compared to placebo.The number of additional people (absolute difference in risk) who experienced adverse events from macrolides was: gastrointestinal disorders NOS 85/1000; diarrhoea 72/1000; abdominal pain 62/1000; nausea 47/1000; and vomiting 23/1000.The number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) ranged from 12 (95% CI 8 to 23) for gastrointestinal disorders NOS to 17 (9 to 47) for abdominal pain; 19 (12 to 33) for diarrhoea; 19 (13 to 30) for nausea; and 45 (22 to 295) for vomiting.There was no clear consistent difference in gastrointestinal adverse events between different types of macrolides or route of administration.Taste disturbances were reported more often by participants taking macrolide antibiotics, although there were wide confidence intervals and moderate heterogeneity (OR 4.95, 95% CI 1.64 to 14.93; I² = 46%; low-quality evidence).Compared with participants taking placebo, those taking macrolides experienced hearing loss more often, however only four studies reported this outcome (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.70; I² = 0%; low-quality evidence).We did not find any evidence that macrolides caused more cardiac disorders (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.40; very low-quality evidence); hepatobiliary disorders (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.27 to 4.09; very low-quality evidence); or changes in liver enzymes (OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.73 to 3.37; very low-quality evidence) compared to placebo.We did not find any evidence that appetite loss, dizziness, headache, respiratory symptoms, blood infections, skin and soft tissue infections, itching, or rashes were reported more often by participants treated with macrolides compared to placebo.Macrolides caused less cough (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.80; moderate-quality evidence) and fewer respiratory tract infections (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.80; moderate-quality evidence) compared to placebo, probably because these are not adverse events, but rather characteristics of the indications for the antibiotics. Less fever (OR 0.73, 95% 0.54 to 1.00; moderate-quality evidence) was also reported by participants taking macrolides compared to placebo, although these findings were non-significant.There was no increase in mortality in participants taking macrolides compared with placebo (OR 0.96, 95% 0.87 to 1.06; I² = 11%; low-quality evidence).Only 24 studies (13%) provided useful data on macrolide-resistant bacteria. Macrolide-resistant bacteria were more commonly identified among participants immediately after exposure to the antibiotic. However, differences in resistance thereafter were inconsistent.Pharmaceutical companies supplied the trial medication or funding, or both, for 91 trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The macrolides as a group clearly increased rates of gastrointestinal adverse events. Most trials made at least some statement about adverse events, such as "none were observed". However, few trials clearly listed adverse events as outcomes, reported on the methods used for eliciting adverse events, or even detailed the numbers of people who experienced adverse events in both the intervention and placebo group. This was especially true for the adverse event of bacterial resistance.

Microbiological and clinical effects of probiotics and antibiotics on nonsurgical treatment of chronic periodontitis: a randomized placebo- controlled trial with 9-month follow-up

Objective

The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled and parallel- arm randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus SP1-containing probiotic sachet and azithromycin tablets as an adjunct to nonsurgical therapy in clinical parameters and in presence and levels of Tannerella forsythia, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans.

Material and Methods

Forty-seven systemically healthy volunteers with chronic periodontitis were recruited and monitored clinically and microbiologically at baseline for 3, 6 and 9 months after therapy. Subgingival plaque samples were collected from four periodontal sites with clinical attachment level ≥1 mm, probing pocket depth ≥4 mm and bleeding on probing, one site in each quadrant. Samples were cultivated and processed using the PCR technique. Patients received nonsurgical therapy including scaling and root planing (SRP) and were randomly assigned to a probiotic (n=16), antibiotic (n = 16) or placebo (n = 15) group. L. rhamnosus SP1 was taken once a day for 3 months. Azithromycin 500mg was taken once a day for 5 days.

Results

All groups showed improvements in clinical and microbiological parameters at all time points evaluated. Probiotic and antibiotic groups showed greater reductions in cultivable microbiota compared with baseline. The placebo group showed greater reduction in number of subjects with P. gingivalis compared with baseline. However, there were no significant differences between groups.

Conclusions

The adjunctive use of L. rhamnosus SP1 sachets and azithromycin during initial therapy resulted in similar clinical and microbiological improvements compared with the placebo group.

Comparison of adjunctive azithromycin and amoxicillin/metronidazole for patients with chronic periodontitis: preliminary randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

There are insufficient guidelines for the use of adjunctive systemic antibiotics for patients with periodontal disease. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes for patients with moderate-advanced chronic periodontitis treated with: scaling and root planing (SRP), SRP with amoxicillin and metronidazole (A+M), SRP with Azithromycin (Az).

METHODS

Thirty-seven non-smokers with generalized moderate to advanced chronic periodontitis were divided into three treatment groups: SRP, A+M and Az. Patients received the medications after the last SRP session and were reviewed three months later. Changes in clinical parameters were compared between the groups. Separate analyses were executed for: 'all sites', 'molar sites', 'sites with different PPD severities' and 'number of sites with shallow, moderate and deep PPD'.

RESULTS

The three groups exhibited improvements in most clinical parameters. At three months, A+M showed a higher reduction in PPD compared to Az in the 'all sites analysis'. Molars exhibited better reduction in BOP and PPD with A+M than SRP. Pocket depth of the 4-6 mm category reduced more in the A+M than SRP. A+M experienced a higher increase in the number of sites with PPD 1-3 mm than Az.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive systemic antibiotics in the initial phase of treatment may result in improved clinical outcomes.

Effect of azithromycin on a red complex polymicrobial biofilm

Azithromycin has recently gained popularity for the treatment of periodontal disease, despite sparse literature supporting efficiency in treating periodontal bacterial biofilms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of azithromycin on biofilms comprised of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia in comparison to an amoxicillin and metronidazole combination. P. gingivalis W50, T. denticola ATCC35405, and T. forsythia ATCC43037 grown under anaerobic conditions at 37°C were aliquoted into 96-well flat-bottom plates in different combinations with addition of azithromycin or amoxicillin + metronidazole at various concentrations. For the biofilm assay, the plates were incubated at 37°C anaerobically for 48 h, after which the biofilms were stained with crystal violet and measured for absorbance at AU₆₂₀. In this model, polymicrobial biofilms of P. gingivalis + T. denticola, P. gingivalis + T. forsythia, and T. denticola + T. forsythia were cultured. Combination of all three bacteria enhanced biofilm biomass. Azithromycin demonstrated a minimal biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) of 10.6 mg/L, while the amoxicillin + metronidazole combination was more effective in inhibiting biofilm formation with a MBIC of 1.63 mg/L. Polymicrobial biofilm formation was demonstrated by combination of all three red complex bacteria. Azithromycin was ineffective in preventing biofilm formation within a clinically achievable concentration, whereas the combination of amoxicillin and metronidazole was more effective for this purpose.

Azithromycin buccal patch in treatment of chronic periodontitis

Aim:

This study aims to explore the clinical, microbiological, and biochemical impact of azithromycin (AZM) buccal patch in chronic generalized patients as a monotherapy as well as an adjunct to nonsurgical therapy.

Materials and Methods:

A parallel design was used forty periodontitis patients were randomly allocated into five groups, namely Group 1 scaling root planing (SRP) alone, Group 2 (SRP + AZM patch group), Group 3 (SRP + AZM tablet group), Group 4 (AZM patch monotherapy), and Group 5 (AZM tablet as monotherapy). Plaque index, gingival bleeding index, modified gingival index, probing pocket depth (PPD), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were assessed at baseline and 21 and 90 days. Subgingival pooled plaque sample was collected to assess periodontopathogens like Porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella intermedia (Pi) by anaerobic culture method. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) was also evaluated at baseline and 21 days. Periodontal maintenance was performed in Group 1 until 90^th day, and clinical parameter was assessed at the end of 90^th day.

Results:

SRP + AZM tablets showed greater reduction in clinical parameters (P < 0.05) AZM as monotherapy did not offer clinical benefits over SRP. Baseline data were compared at the end, i.e., 90^th day a significant reduction in plaque scores, gingival bleeding, and PPD was observed however no significant gain in the clinical attachment was observed.

Conclusion:

The monotherapy resulted in no improvement of periodontal parameters, microbial parameters, and TNF-α level. It is safe to use AZM + SRP as a mode of nonsurgical treatment in periodontitis patients.

Drug-Induced Gingival Hyperplasia in Transplant Recipients

Gingival hyperplasia is a common occurrence in transplant recipients who are taking cyclosporine. This condition can be complicated when calcium channel blockers or phenytoin are added to the armamentarium of medications; it can be painful and may interfere with eating, speech, and appearance. Multiple mechanisms exist for gingival overgrowth. Prevention with appropriate oral hygiene appears important in controlling the inflammatory component and decreasing the severity of the overgrowth. Patients must be aware of the potential for the development of gingival hyperplasia and must follow up with regular professional cleanings. If the overgrowth persists, treatment options should be discussed between patients and their physician. Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus, treatment with antibiotic therapy, and surgical excision or laser therapy are all potential therapies to consider.

Effectiveness of azithromycin in aspiration pneumonia: a prospective observational study

Background

Aspiration pneumonia is an urgent health concern with high mortality and long hospitalization in industrialized and aging countries. However, there is no information about the effectiveness of azithromycin (AZM) for the treatment of aspiration pneumonia. This study investigated if AZM is effective for the treatment of aspiration pneumonia.

Methods

Patients with aspiration pneumonia with no risk of multidrug-resistant pathogens were included in this prospective study at Kishiwada City Hospital from December 2011 to June 2013. Patients were divided into the ampicillin/sulbactam (ABPC/SBT) and AZM (intravenous injection) groups. The success rates of 1^st-line antibiotic therapy, mortality, length of hospital stay, and total antibiotic costs were compared.

Results

There were 81 and 36 patients in the ABPC/SBT and AZM groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the success rate of 1^st-line antibiotics between the groups (74.1% vs. 75.0%, respectively, P = 1.000). Mortality and hospitalization periods did not differ between the 2 groups (11.1% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.753, and 22.3 ± 7.3 days vs. 20.5 ± 8.1 days, P = 0.654, respectively). However, the total antibiotic costs were significantly lower in the AZM group than the ABPC/SBT group (2.19 ± 1.65 × 10,000 yen vs. 2.94 ± 1.67 × 10,000 yen, respectively, P = 0.034). The febrile period of the ABPC/SBT group was significantly shorter than that of the AZM group (P = 0.025).

Conclusions

In this small prospective non-randomized observational study, we found no statistically significant differences in mortality or antibiotic failure in patients receiving AZM compared to ABPC/SBT for the treatment of patients with aspiration pneumonia who require hospital admission and have no risk of drug-resistant pathogens. Therefore, AZM may be another first choice of antibiotic treatment for patients with aspiration pneumonia when they have no risk of multidrug-resistant pathogens.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-014-0685-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Non-surgical periodontal therapy with systemic antibiotics in patients with untreated chronic periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness of different systemic antibiotics in combination with scaling and root planing (SRP) when compared to SRP alone in patients with untreated chronic periodontitis.

BACKGROUND

Although chronic periodontitis is mostly treated without adjunctive systemic antibiotics, some recent meta-analyses have shown clinical benefit for some systemic antibiotics when used as an adjunct to SRP. However, there is a wide variety of systemic antibiotic regimens used today. It remains unclear if the selected type of systemic antibiotic influences the magnitude of clinical benefit.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The MEDLINE-PubMed database was searched from their earliest records through May 16, 2013. Several journals were hand searched and some authors were contacted for additional information. Outcome measures analysed were mean bleeding on probing change, mean clinical attachment level gain and mean probing pocket depth reduction. Extracted data were pooled using a random effect model. Weighted mean differences were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed.

RESULTS

The search yielded 281 abstracts. Ultimately, 95 studies were selected, describing 43 studies meeting the eligibility criteria. Systemic antibiotics showed a significant (p < 0.05) additional pocket depth reduction for moderate (at 3 mo 0.27 mm ± 0.09, at 6 mo 0.23 mm ± 0.10 and at 12 mo 0.25 mm ± 0.27) and deep pockets (at 3 mo 0.62 mm ± 0.17, at 6 mo 0.58 mm ± 0.16 and at 12 mo 0.74 mm ± 0.30). Statistically, no specific type of antibiotic was superior over another. However, when analysing the clinical data for initially moderate pockets or deep pockets, some trends became apparent.

CONCLUSION

Systemic antibiotics combined with SRP offer additional clinical improvements compared to SRP alone. Although there were no statistically significant differences, there was a trend that for initially moderate and deep pockets, metronidazole or metronidazole combined with amoxicillin, resulted in clinical improvements that were more pronounced over doxycycline or azithromycin. Additionally, there was a trend that the magnitude of the clinical benefit became smaller over time (1 year).

Azithromycin suppresses human osteoclast formation and activity in vitro

Azithromycin is an antibiotic with anti-inflammatory properties used as an adjunct to treat periodontitis, a common inflammatory mediated condition featuring pathologic alveolar bone resorption. This study aimed to determine the effect of azithromycin on human osteoclast formation and resorptive activity in vitro. Osteoclasts were generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells stimulated with macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK) ligand. The effects of azithromycin at concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 40 µg/ml were tested. Osteoclast formation and activity, acidification, actin ring formation and expression of mRNA, and protein encoding for key osteoclast genes were assessed. The results demonstrated that azithromycin reduced osteoclast resorptive activity at all concentrations tested with osteoclast formation being significantly reduced at the higher concentrations (20 and 40 µg/ml). mRNA and protein expression of key osteoclast transcription factor Nuclear Factor of Activated T cells (NFATc1) was significantly reduced by azithromycin at later stages of osteoclast development (day 17). Azithromycin also reduced tumor necrosis factor receptor associated factor-6 (TRAF6) mRNA expression at day 14, and cathepsin K mRNA expression at days 14 and 17. Integrin β3 and MMP-9 mRNA expression was reduced by azithromycin at day 17 in osteoclasts cultured on dentine. The osteoclast proton pump did not appear to be affected by azithromycin, however formation of the actin ring cytoskeleton was inhibited. This study demonstrates that azithromycin inhibits human osteoclast function in vitro, which may account for at least some of the beneficial clinical effects observed with azithromycin treatment in periodontitis.

Systemic anti-microbial agents used in periodontal therapy

Periodontitis is an infectious disease with marked inflammatory response, leading to destruction of underlying tissues. The aim of periodontal therapy is to eradicate the pathogens associated with the disease and attain periodontal health. This is achieved by non-surgical and surgical therapy; however, mechanical debridement and topical application of antiseptics may not be helpful in all cases. In such cases, adjunctive systemic antibiotic therapy remains the treatment of choice. It can reach micro-organisms at the base of the deep periodontal pockets and furcation areas via serum, and also affect organisms residing within gingival epithelium and connective tissue. Before advising any anti-microbial agent, it is necessary to have knowledge of that agent. The aim of this review article is to provide basic details of each systemic anti-microbial agent used in periodontal therapy. The points discussed are its mode of action, susceptible periodontal pathogens, dosage, its use in treatment of periodontal disease, and mechanism of bacterial resistance to each anti-microbial agent. It might be of some help while prescribing these drugs.

Azithromycin in periodontal treatment: more than an antibiotic

Azithromycin is a macrolide antibiotic used extensively in medicine for the treatment of a wide range of infections such as upper respiratory tract infections, middle ear infections, sexually transmitted infections and trachoma. It is also effective against the most common periodontopathogens. The versatility of the macrolides extends beyond their antibiotic properties as a result of their well-documented immune-modulating/anti-inflammatory effects. Macrolides, including azithromycin, are therefore used to treat diseases not associated with bacteria, such as severe asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases and, more recently, cystic fibrosis. Azithromycin is concentrated in neutrophils, macrophages and particularly fibroblasts; all of these cells are central players in the pathogenesis of most periodontal diseases. This paper reviews the diverse properties of azithromycin and the clinical periodontal studies of its effects in both the treatment of periodontitis and in resolving drug-related gingival overgrowth. Evidence exists to support the use of a single course of azithromycin in the treatment of advanced periodontal diseases. Azithromycin could have a triple role in the treatment and resolution of periodontal diseases: suppressing periodontopathogens, anti-inflammatory activity and healing through persistence at low levels in macrophages and fibroblasts in periodontal tissues, even after a single course of three tablets. If future periodontal research confirms these properties, it could become a valuable host-modulator in periodontal treatment.

Azithromycin concentrations in blood and gingival crevicular fluid after systemic administration

BACKGROUND

Azithromycin is a macrolide antibiotic that is active against several periodontal pathogens. Macrolides are taken up and concentrated inside gingival fibroblasts, which could influence their pharmacokinetics. This study tests the hypothesis that steady-state levels of azithromycin are higher and more sustained in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) than in serum.

METHODS

Four healthy patients received an initial dose of 500-mg azithromycin followed by 250-mg doses on each of the next 2 days. Serum and GCF samples were obtained 2 hours after the last dose on day 2, and on days 4 and 7. GCF samples were collected from maxillary posterior sites with paper strips. The strips were pooled and eluted with high-purity water. After extraction, the azithromycin content of the serum samples and GCF eluates was determined with an agar diffusion bioassay.

RESULTS

On days 2, 4, and 7, the concentrations of azithromycin in blood serum were 0.22 ± 0.02, 0.08 ± 0.02, and 0.04 ± 0.01 μg/mL, respectively. The concentrations in GCF were 8.82 ± 1.25, 7.90 ± 1.72, and 7.38 ± 1.15 μg/mL, respectively. Mean GCF levels were significantly higher than mean serum levels (P ≤0.02; paired t test).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrate that the pharmacokinetic profiles of azithromycin are different in GCF and serum. At steady state, azithromycin concentrations in GCF were higher and more sustained than those in serum. Based on previous studies, the levels observed in GCF were above the minimal inhibitory concentration for Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (previously Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans), Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Prevotella intermedia.

Azithromycin may inhibit interleukin-8 through suppression of Rac1 and a nuclear factor-kappa B pathway in KB cells stimulated with lipopolysaccharide

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that the 15-member macrolide antibiotic azithromycin (AZM) not only has antibacterial activity, but also results in the role of immunomodulator. Interleukin (IL)-8 is an important inflammatory mediator in periodontal disease. However, there have been no reports on the effects of AZM on IL-8 production from human oral epithelium. Therefore, we investigated the effects of AZM on IL-8 production in an oral epithelial cell line.

METHODS

KB cells were stimulated by Escherichia coli or Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (previously Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans) lipopolysaccharide (LPS) with or without AZM. IL-8 mRNA and protein expression and production in response to LPS were analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, flow cytometry, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The activation of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) and Rac1, which is important for IL-8 expression, was analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blotting, respectively.

RESULTS

IL-8 mRNA expression, IL-8 production, and NF-κB activation in LPS-stimulated KB cells were inhibited by the addition of AZM. LPS-induced Rac1 activation was also suppressed by AZM.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that AZM inhibits LPS-induced IL-8 production in an oral epithelial cell line, in part caused by the suppression of Rac1 and NF-κB activation. The use of AZM might provide possible benefits in periodontal therapy, with respect to both its antibacterial action and apparent anti-inflammatory effect.

Clarithromycin accumulation by phagocytes and its effect on killing of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans

BACKGROUND

Clarithromycin inhibits several periodontal pathogens and is concentrated inside gingival fibroblasts and epithelial cells by an active transporter. We hypothesized that polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) and less mature myeloid cells possess a similar transporter for clarithromycin. It is feasible that clarithromycin accumulation inside PMNs could enhance their ability to kill Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (previously Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans).

METHODS

To test the first hypothesis, purified PMNs and cultured HL-60 cells were incubated with [(3)H]-clarithromycin. Clarithromycin transport was assayed by measuring changes in cell-associated radioactivity over time. The second hypothesis was examined with PMNs loaded by incubation with clarithromycin (5 μg/ml). Opsonized bacteria were incubated at 37°C with control and clarithromycin-loaded PMNs.

RESULTS

Mature human PMNs, HL-60 cells differentiated into granulocytes, and undifferentiated HL-60 cells all took up clarithromycin in a saturable manner. The kinetics of uptake by all yielded linear Lineweaver-Burk plots. HL-60 granulocytes transported clarithromycin with a K(m) of ≈250 μg/ml and a V(max) of 473 ng/min/10(6) cells, which were not significantly different from the values obtained with PMNs. At steady state, clarithromycin levels inside HL-60 granulocytes and PMNs were 28- to 71-fold higher than extracellular levels. Clarithromycin-loaded PMNs killed significantly more A. actinomycetemcomitans and achieved shorter half-times for killing than control PMNs when assayed at a bacteria-to-PMN ratio of 100:1 (P <0.04). At a ratio of 30:1, these differences were not consistently significant.

CONCLUSIONS

PMNs and less mature myeloid cells possess a transporter that takes up and concentrates clarithromycin. This system could help PMNs cope with an overwhelming infection by A. actinomycetemcomitans.

Comparison of Azithromycin and Oral Hygiene Program in the Treatment of Cyclosporine-Induced Gingival Hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

It has been shown that azithromycin improves cyclosporine-induced gingival hyperplasia (GH), but its efficacy was never compared against an efficient oral hygiene program (OHP). The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of azithromycin plus OHP versus OHP alone in patients with cyclosporine-induced GH.

METHODS

After periodontal evaluation, 20 renal transplant recipients received detailed oral hygiene instructions and a complete OHP, and were randomized to control (OHP) or azithromycin groups (OHP plus azithromycin). Patients were re-evaluated after 15 and 30 days. Both groups were similar in time after transplant, age, gender, cyclosporine dose, and cyclosporine through level and serum creatinine. The control group had fewer patients using calcium cannel blockers (10% vs. 70%, p = 0.02).

RESULTS

All patients improved in pain, halitosis, and gum bleeding after OHP. The control group did not improve plaque index (PI) or GH. In contrast, baseline PI decreased from 1.52 +/- 0.28 to 0.50 +/- 0.16 on day 15 (p < 0.01) and to 0.46 +/- 0.14 on day 30 (p < 0.01) in the azithromycin group, and the GH score decreased from 1.9 +/- 0.27 to 0.90 +/- 0.27 on day 15 (p < 0.05) and to 0.70 +/- 0.21 on day 30 (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Azithromycin associated to efficient OHP induced a striking reduction in cyclosporine-induced GH, while efficient OHP alone improved oral symptoms but did not decrease cyclosporine-induced GH.

Diagnosis and treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease

Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), the infection and inflammation of the female upper genital tract, is a common cause of infertility, chronic pain and ectopic pregnancy. Diagnosis and management are challenging, largely resulting from varying signs and symptoms and a polymicrobial etiology that is not fully delineated. Owing to the potential for serious sequelae, a low threshold for diagnosis and treatment is recommended. As PID has a multimicrobial etiology, including Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydial trachomatis and anaerobic and mycoplasmal bacteria, treatment of PID should consist of a broad spectrum antibiotic regimen. Recent treatment trials have focused on shorter duration regimens, such as azithromycin, and monotherapies including ofloxacin, but data are sparse. Research comparing sequelae development by differing antimicrobial regimens is extremely limited, but will ultimately shape future treatment guidelines.

Clinical and microbiologic effects of subgingivally delivered 0.5% azithromycin in the treatment of chronic periodontitis

BACKGROUND

Recent developments suggest that the local delivery of antimicrobials into periodontal pockets can improve periodontal health. The present study was undertaken to investigate the clinical and microbiologic effectiveness of azithromycin (AZM) at 0.5% concentration in an indigenously prepared bioabsorbable controlled-release gel as an adjunct to non-surgical mechanical therapy in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.

METHODS

Eighty patients were categorized into two treatment groups: scaling and root planing (SRP) only (group 1) and SRP plus 0.5% AZM (group 2). Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline and 1, 2, and 3 months; they included modified gingival index, modified sulcus bleeding index, probing depth (PD), and clinical attachment level (CAL). At baseline and 6 and 12 weeks, microbiologic assessment was done of the percentage of morphologically different microorganisms (coccoid cells, others [straight rods, filaments, and fusiforms], motile rods, and spirochetes) using darkfield microscopy. The mean concentration of 0.5% AZM in gingival crevicular fluid was estimated by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

Both therapies resulted in significant improvements. Mean PD reduction from baseline to 3 months was 2.13 +/- 0.35 mm and 2.53 +/- 0.52 in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Mean CAL gain from baseline to 3 months was 0.60 +/- 0.63 mm and 1.07 +/- 0.70 mm in groups 1 and 2, respectively. All microbiologic categories showed significant improvement in both groups, with greater improvement in the test group. The mean concentration of AZM at all observed periods (baseline to 28 days) provided sufficient antimicrobial activity (>2 microg/ml) and fulfilled the conditions for a controlled-release device.

CONCLUSION

Although both treatment strategies seemed to benefit the patients, the adjunctive use of 0.5% AZM as a controlled drug-delivery system enhanced the clinical and microbiologic results as shown by the intergroup comparison.

Distribution of systemic clarithromycin to gingiva

BACKGROUND

Aggressive and recurrent forms of periodontitis are associated with infections by Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (previously Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans) and Porphyromonas gingivalis. Because these pathogens invade tissue, they are difficult to eliminate by root planing alone. The use of systemic antibiotics in conjunction with root planing significantly enhances clinical and microbiologic treatment outcomes. Although it is not widely prescribed by periodontists, clarithromycin is potentially useful because it is taken up by host cells and has favorable antimicrobial activity.

METHODS

Experimental gingivitis was induced in eight healthy subjects at one randomly selected maxillary posterior site. The contralateral maxillary site served as the healthy control. Thereafter, subjects were administered six doses of clarithromycin, 500 mg, every 12 hours. Blood was then drawn, and samples of gingiva were harvested from both sites. The samples were extracted, and clarithromycin content was analyzed by liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

Mean clarithromycin concentrations in healthy control and inflamed gingiva (2.4 and 3.0 microg/g, respectively) were significantly higher than in serum (0.5 microg/ml; P <0.05). Clarithromycin levels at control and gingivitis sites were higher than serum by 5.7- and 7.0-fold, respectively (difference between sites was significant; P = 0.02). At control sites, a significant decrease in gingival crevicular fluid flow rate was evident at the conclusion of the clarithromycin regimen (P = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Clarithromycin can attain higher levels in gingiva than serum and reach higher levels in inflamed gingiva than in healthy gingiva. Its distribution profile seems to be suitable for the treatment of periodontitis. The reduction in crevicular fluid flow at control sites suggested that clarithromycin may produce anti-inflammatory effects.

Clarithromycin transport by gingival fibroblasts and epithelial cells

Macrolide antibiotics penetrate cells, but the mechanism by which this occurs is unclear. The objective of this study was to characterize the mechanisms of clarithromycin uptake by gingival fibroblasts and oral epithelium. Cultured human gingival fibroblasts and SCC-25 cells were incubated with [(3)H]-clarithromycin. We assayed clarithromycin transport by measuring cell-associated radioactivity over time. Fibroblasts and epithelial cells rapidly accumulated clarithromycin, attaining steady-state intracellular concentrations within 15 minutes. Incubation in medium containing 2 mug/mL clarithromycin yielded steady-state intracellular concentrations of 75.8 mug/mL in fibroblasts and 6.6 mug/mL in SCC-25 cells. Clarithromycin transport exhibited Michaelis-Menten kinetics and was inhibited below 37 degrees C. The Michaelis constants for fibro-blasts and SCC-25 cells were 78.4 and 227 mug/mL, respectively, while the maximum transport velocities were 264 and 381 ng/min/10(6) cells, respectively. Thus, both types of cells take up clarithromycin via a concentrative active transport system. By increasing intracellular clarithromycin levels, this system may enhance the effectiveness of clarithromycin against invasive periodontal pathogens.

Effect of adjunctive systemic azithromycin with periodontal surgery in the treatment of chronic periodontitis in smokers: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Along with conventional surgical therapy, systemic antibiotics may provide more effective treatment in smokers by targeting tissue-invasive bacteria. The aim of this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked clinical trial was to evaluate the adjunctive effects of systemic azithromycin (AZM) in combination with periodontal pocket reduction surgery in the treatment of chronic periodontitis in smokers.

METHODS

Thirty patients with a greater than one pack/day smoking habit and generalized moderate to severe chronic periodontitis were randomized to the test (surgery plus 3 days of AZM, 500 mg) or control group (surgery plus 3 days of placebo). Full-mouth probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival index (GI), plaque index, and wound healing indices (WHI) were assessed at baseline and at 2 weeks and 1, 3, and 6 months following surgical intervention. Plaque and gingival crevicular fluid were collected for trypsin-like enzyme activity (benzoyl-dl-arginine naphthylamine) and bone biomarker (crosslinked telopeptide of type I collagen [ICTP]) analyses, respectively, at baseline, 2 weeks, and 1, 3, and 6 months.

RESULTS

Surgical treatment of moderate (PD = 4 to 6 mm) and deep (PD > 6 mm) pockets significantly improved clinical parameters of treated and untreated teeth (CAL gain, PD reduction, and reduction of BOP). The additional use of AZM did not enhance this improvement nor did it promote reduction of ICTP levels. Compared to the control group, the test group had significantly better WHI scores at 1 month, significantly less GI at 2 weeks, and sustained reductions of red-complex bacteria with trypsin-like enzyme activity at 3 months. For non-surgery teeth, only the test group showed significant gains in overall CAL compared to baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this pilot study demonstrated that in heavy smokers, adjunctive systemic AZM in combination with pocket reduction surgery did not significantly enhance PD reduction or CAL gain. However, the clinical value of adjunctive AZM may be appreciated by more rapid wound healing, less short-term gingival inflammation, and sustained reductions of periopathogenic bacteria. More expanded studies are recommended to better determine the clinical effects of adjunctive AZM in patients who smoke.

Drug Concentration in Inflamed Periodontal Tissues After Systemically Administered Azithromycin

BACKGROUND

Azithromycin is an azalide antibiotic, effective against a wide range of oral bacteria including periodontopathic bacteria. Azithromycin is taken up by phagocytes and is released into inflamed tissue over time. The concentration of azithromycin in inflamed periodontal tissues over time has not been studied. In this study, we determined the azithromycin concentration in the gingiva and inflammatory connective tissue of the periodontal pocket in periodontal patients who had been administered azithromycin systemically. We also evaluated the clinical and microbiologic effects of azithromycin.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with periodontitis were prescribed azithromycin 500 mg once daily for 3 days. During the 14-day study, clinical parameters (probing depth, gingival index, bleeding on probing, and gingival crevicular fluid level) were recorded, subgingival plaque was collected for bacteriologic examination, and the azithromycin concentration in the tissues lining the periodontal pocket was measured by agar diffusion bioassay.

RESULTS

Clinical parameters significantly improved after administration of azithromycin. The total number of cultivated bacteria also significantly decreased by day 4 but slightly increased after day 7. Sustained reduction in levels of six periodontopathic bacteria was not apparent until day 14. On day 7, the azithromycin concentration in the tissues lining the periodontal pockets was 50% of that on day 4, and on day 14 only 20%.

CONCLUSION

Azithromycin is detectable in inflamed periodontal tissues >or=14 days after systemic administration; it is associated with clinical and microbiologic improvement.

Epidemiology, pathogenesis and treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease

Pelvic inflammatory disease, the infection and inflammation of the female upper genital tract, is a common cause of infertility, chronic pain and ectopic pregnancy. Diagnosis and management are challenging, due largely to a polymicrobial etiology which is not fully delineated. Signs and symptoms of this syndrome vary widely, further complicating diagnosis and treatment. Due to the potential for serious sequelae, a low threshold for diagnosis and treatment is recommended. Since pelvic inflammatory disease has a multimicrobial etiology including Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and anaerobic and mycoplasmal bacteria, treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease should be broad spectrum. Recent treatment trials have focused on shorter duration regimens such as azithromycin and monotherapies including ofloxacin, although data are sparse. Research comparing sequelae development by differing antimicrobial regimens is extremely limited, but will ultimately shape future treatment guidelines. Several promising short-duration and monotherapy antibiotic regimens should be evaluated in pelvic inflammatory disease treatment trials for compliance, microbiological and clinical cure, and reduction of subsequent adverse reproductive and gynecological morbidity.

Systemic antibiotics in periodontics

This position paper addresses the role of systemic antibiotics in the treatment of periodontal disease. Topical antibiotic therapy is not discussed here. The paper was prepared by the Research, Science and Therapy Committee of the American Academy of Periodontology. The document consists of three sections: 1) concept of antibiotic periodontal therapy; 2) efficacy of antibiotic periodontal therapy; and 3) practical aspects of antibiotic periodontal therapy. The conclusions drawn in this paper represent the position of the American Academy of Periodontology and are intended for the information of the dental profession.

Clinical Response of Azithromycin as an Adjunct to Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy in Smokers

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic therapy can be used in very specific periodontal treatment situations such as in refractory cases of periodontal disease found to be more prevalent in smokers. This study was designed to determine the efficacy of azithromycin (AZM) when combined with scaling and root planing (SRP) for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic periodontitis in smokers.

METHODS

Thirty-one subjects were enrolled into a 6-month randomized, single-masked trial to evaluate clinical, microbial (using benzoyl- DL-arginine naphthylamine [BANA] assay), and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) pyridinoline cross-linked carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) levels in response to SRP alone or SRP + AZM. At baseline, patients who smoked > or =1 pack per day of cigarettes who presented with at least five sites with probing depths (PD) of > or =5 mm with bleeding on probing (BOP) were randomized into the test or control groups. At baseline and 3 and 6 months, clinical measurements (probing depth [PD], clinical attachment loss [CAL], and bleeding on probing [BOP]) were performed. GCF bone marker assessment (Ctelopeptide [ICTP] as well as BANA test analyses) were performed at baseline, 14 days, and 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated that both groups displayed clinical improvements in PD and CAL that were sustained for 6 months. Using a subject-based analysis, patients treated with SRP + AZM showed enhanced reductions in PD and gains in CAL at moderate (4 to 6 mm) and deep sites (>6 mm) (P <0.05). Furthermore, SRP + AZM resulted in greater reductions in BANA levels compared to SRP alone (P <0.05) while rebounds in BANA levels were noted in control group at the 6-month evaluation. No statistically significant differences between groups on mean BOP and ICTP levels during the course of the study were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of AZM in combination with SRP improves the efficacy of non-surgical periodontal therapy in reducing probing depth and improving attachment levels in smokers with moderate to advanced attachment loss.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Antimicrobial Treatments of Orofacial Odontogenic Infections

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of antimicrobial therapy in oral odontogenic infections using estimated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters or efficacy indices, and to compare pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints with National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards' (NCCLS) breakpoints.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective literature search to obtain minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values, pharmacokinetic parameters of antimicrobials and NCCLS breakpoints. Pharmacokinetic simulations were carried out using WinNonlin software (Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, CA, USA).

METHODS

For antimicrobials with time-dependent activity, the time that the plasma drug concentration exceeds the MIC as the percentage of dose interval at steady state was calculated. For antimicrobials with concentration-dependent activity, the total area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 hours at steady state divided by the MIC was calculated. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints were calculated according to these parameters.

RESULTS

Only amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and clindamycin showed adequate efficacy indices against the most commonly isolated bacteria in odontogenic infections. Metronidazole reached good indices against anaerobes only. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic susceptibility breakpoints do not coincide exactly with NCCLS breakpoints.

CONCLUSION

Owing to the scarcity of double-blind, clinical trials on the use of antimicrobials in endodontics, this study may be useful in determining the best antimicrobial treatment in these infections. However, as we have not used concentration data in infected tissue to determine pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices, it would be necessary to design clinical trials in order to confirm these results.

Azithromycin and dentistry - a useful agent?

OBJECTIVES

Azithromycin has recently replaced clindamycin oral suspension for prop hylaxis of infective endocarditis (IE) in children. It is also currently recommended by the American Heart Association as an alternative to penicillin, along with clindamycin for prophylaxis of infective endocarditis in adults. The objectives of this paper were to firstly, review the current literature on the efficacy of azithromycin as a suitable prophylactic agent in the prevention of infective endocarditis; and secondly, to review its pharmacological properties as a suitable therapeutic agent in the management of odontogenic infections.

DESIGN

A review of the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence from animal models on infective endocarditis supports the efficacy of this drug as a prophylactic agent against oral streptococci. The pharmacological properties of this agent would make it a very promising therapeutic adjunct in the management of odontogenic infections. At present there are only a small number of studies available with valuable data on the efficacy of this relatively new drug. Further investigations comparing this compound with other commonly used adjuncts would be of great benefit.

A systematic review on the effect of systemic antimicrobials as an adjunct to scaling and root planing in periodontitis patients

BACKGROUND

Scaling and root planing (SRP) are the bases of non-surgical therapy in the treatment of periodontitis. However, results from this therapy are often unpredictable and dependable from many different factors.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of the adjunctive use of systemic antimicrobials with scaling and root planing (SRP) vs. SRP alone in the treatment of chronic (CP) or aggressive periodontitis (AgP).

SEARCH STRATEGY

Use of computerized databases, namely MEDLINE, the Cochrane Oral Health Group Specialty Trials Register and EMBASE; reference lists from relevant articles were hand-searched; and a hand-search of selected journals until April 2001.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were selected if they were designed as controlled clinical trials in which systemically healthy patients with either AgP or CP were treated with SRP plus systemic antimicrobials in comparison with SRP alone or with placebo, for a minimum of 6 months. Main outcome measures were clinical attachment level (CAL) change and probing pocket depth (PPD) change.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted independently information regarding quality and study characteristics, in duplicate. Kappa scores determined their agreement. Main results were collected and grouped by drug, disease and PPD category. For the quantitative data synthesis, the data was pooled (when mean differences and standard errors were available), and either a Fixed Effects or Random Effects meta-analysis was used for the analysis.

RESULTS

After an initial selection, 158 papers were identified by the manual and electronic searches; 25 papers were eligible for inclusion. Their quality assessment showed that randomization and allocation concealment methods were seldom reported and blindness was usually not defined clearly. In general, selected studies showed high variability and lack of relevant information for an adequate assessment. Overall, SRP plus systemic antimicrobial groups demonstrated better results in CAL and PPD change than SRP alone or with placebo groups. Only limited meta-analyses could be performed, due to the difficulties in pooling the studies and the lack of appropriate data. This analysis showed a statistically significant additional benefit for spiramycin (PPD change) and amoxicillin/metronidazole (CAL change) in deep pockets.

CONCLUSION

Systemic antimicrobials in conjunction with SRP, can offer an additional benefit over SRP alone in the treatment of periodontitis, in terms of CAL and PPD change, and reduced risk of additional CAL loss. However, differences in study methodology and lack of data precluded an adequate and complete pooling of data for a more comprehensive analyses. It was difficult to establish definitive conclusions, although patients with deep pockets, progressive or 'active' disease, or specific microbiological profile, can benefit more from this adjunctive therapy.

In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of oral strains of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans to seven antibiotics

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Periodontal infections with Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans seem to be refractory to conventional therapy. The aim of the present study was to test the in vitro susceptibilities of A. actinomycetemcomitans strains to a panel of seven orally administrable antibiotics.

METHODS

A total of 60 isolates of A. actinomycetemcomitans recovered from 43 individuals with gingivitis or periodontitis were tested. In addition, laboratory strains UP-6 and JP2 were analysed. The E-test was employed in order to determine minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of antibiotics ampicillin/sulbactam, roxithromycin, azithromycin, doxycycline, metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, and moxifloxacin.

RESULTS

A. actinomycetemcomitans was highly susceptible to both fluoro-quinolones (MIC90 of 0.006 microgram/mL of ciprofloxacin and 0.032 microgram/mL of moxifloxacin). Good susceptibilities were found for ampicillin/sulbactam and doxycycline (MIC90 of 0.75 microgram/mL and 1 microgram/mL, respectively), and moderate susceptibilities for azithromycin (MIC90 of 3 microgram/mL). Most strains were resistant to metronidazole and roxithromycin. Cluster analysis revealed two larger clusters of A. actinomycetemcomitans strains with the smaller cluster assembling isolates with significantly higher MICs of most antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to reported favourable pharmacokinetics, the fluoro-quinolone moxifloxacin appeared to be a promising candidate for adjunctive systemic antibiotic therapy in periodontal infections with A. actinomycetemcomitans.

Drug-induced gingival hyperplasia in transplant recipients

Gingival hyperplasia is a common occurrence in transplant recipients who are taking cyclosporine. This condition can be complicated when calcium channel blockers or phenytoin are added to the armamentarium of medications; it can be painful and may interfere with eating, speech, and appearance. Multiple mechanisms exist for gingival overgrowth. Prevention with appropriate oral hygiene appears important in controlling the inflammatory component and decreasing the severity of the overgrowth. Patients must be aware of the potential for the development of gingival hyperplasia and must follow up with regular professional cleanings. If the overgrowth persists, treatment options should be discussed between patients and their physician. Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus, treatment with antibiotic therapy, and surgical excision or laser therapy are all potential therapies to consider.

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of azithromycin as an adjunct to non-surgical treatment of periodontitis in adults: clinical results

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical and microbiological effects of azithromycin as an adjunct to the non-surgical treatment of periodontitis in adults. Azithromycin is an antibiotic which is taken up by phagocytes and is released over long periods in inflamed tissue but requires a total of only three doses of 500 mg to produce its therapeutic effect.

METHOD

46 patients were treated in a double-blind placebo-controlled study with assessments at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 10 and 22. Throughout the trial measurements were made of plaque, gingival bleeding, calculus, probing pocket depths and bleeding on probing. Microbiological sampling was carried out from a selected pocket >or=6 mm at each visit. The regime employed consisted of OHI, scaling and root planing at weeks 0, 1 and 2 with reinforcement of OHI and minimal scaling at weeks 6, 10 and 22. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either azithromycin, (A), or placebo capsules, (C), 500 mg, 1x daily for 3 days at week 2. 44 patients completed the study. Mean pocket depths were analysed using analysis of covariance in 3 groups with initial pocket depth values of 1-3 mm, 4-5 mm and >or=6 mm.

RESULTS

The results of the microbiology have been reported in a separate paper. The clinical data showed that by week 22 a lower % of pockets initially >5 mm deep remained above that level in the 23 patients taking azithromycin (A), than the 21 taking the placebo (C), (A, 5.6%; C, 23.3%). Also at week 22, for pockets initially 4 mm or more, the test group had fewer pockets >3 mm deep (A, 26.1%; C, 44.3%), fewer failing to improve in probing depth (A, 6.6%; C, 21.6%) and fewer continuing to bleed on probing (A, 46.9%; C, 55.6%) when compared with the control group. Pocket depths initially 4-5 mm or 6-9 mm analysed by analysis of covariance showed lower mean pocket depths in the patients on azithromycin, at weeks 6, 10 and 22, (pockets initially 4-5 mm, p<0.001 on all occasions, pockets initially 6-9 mm, p<0.001, week 6; p< 0.003, week 10; p<0.001, week 22).

CONCLUSIONS

Azithromycin may be a useful adjunct in the treatment of adult periodontitis, particularly where deep pockets are present.

Periodontal disease as a specific, albeit chronic, infection: diagnosis and treatment

Periodontal disease is perhaps the most common chronic infection in adults. Evidence has been accumulating for the past 30 years which indicates that almost all forms of periodontal disease are chronic but specific bacterial infections due to the overgrowth in the dental plaque of a finite number of mostly anaerobic species such as Porphyromonas gingivalis, Bacteroides forsythus, and Treponema denticola. The success of traditional debridement procedures and/or antimicrobial agents in improving periodontal health can be associated with the reduction in levels of these anaerobes in the dental plaque. These findings suggest that patients and clinicians have a choice in the treatment of this overgrowth, either a debridement and surgery approach or a debridement and antimicrobial treatment approach. However, the antimicrobial approach, while supported by a wealth of scientific evidence, goes contrary to centuries of dental teaching that states that periodontal disease results from a "dirty mouth." If periodontal disease is demonstrated to be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and stroke, it will be a modifiable risk factor since periodontal disease can be prevented and treated. Since the antimicrobial approach may be as effective as a surgical approach in the restoration and maintenance of a periodontally healthy dentition, this would give a cardiac or stroke patient and his or her physician a choice in the implementation of treatment seeking to improve the patient's periodontal condition so as to reduce and/or delay future cardiovascular events.

Interaction between piroxicam and azithromycin during distribution to human periodontal tissues

BACKGROUND

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics are important in the prevention of infections and pain associated with periodontal surgery as well as in the adjunctive therapy of periodontal disease. In this study, patients undergoing oral surgery were treated with piroxicam and azithromycin to examine the interactions of these drugs on periodontal tissues.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients were assigned to 3 groups and treated for 3 days as follows: 1) piroxicam 20 mg/day; 2) azithromycin 500 mg/day; or 3) piroxicam 20 mg/day plus azithromycin 500 mg/day. Samples of blood, saliva, gingiva, and alveolar bone were collected during surgery and at days 0.5, 2.5, 4.5, and 6.5 after last dose. Piroxicam concentrations were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography and azithromycin concentrations by microbiological assay.

RESULTS

In patients treated with piroxicam alone, the highest drug concentrations were found in plasma at each time point, but consistent piroxicam levels were also detected in gingival samples up to 4.5 days. The combined treatment with piroxicam plus azithromycin was associated with a reduction of piroxicam concentrations in periodontal tissues. In patients receiving azithromycin alone, high drug levels were measured in periodontal tissues up to 6.5 days. This distribution pattern did not vary in patients treated with piroxicam plus azithromycin.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with piroxicam or azithromycin alone ensures a favorable distribution of these drugs into periodontal tissues. However, upon combined administration, azithromycin interferes negatively with the periodontal disposition of piroxicam. This interaction might depend on the displacement of piroxicam from acceptor sites at the level of periodontal tissues.

The antimicrobial treatment of periodontal disease: changing the treatment paradigm

Over the last 100 years, methods of surgical periodontal treatment have enjoyed a history of success in improving oral health. The paradigm of care is based on the "non-specific plaque hypothesis"--that is, the overgrowth of bacterial plaques cause periodontal disease, and the suppression of this overgrowth reduces disease risk. The central feature of this approach to care is the removal of inflamed gingival tissue around the teeth to reduce periodontal pocket depth, thereby facilitating plaque removal by the dentist and by the patient at home. Over the last 30 years, with the recognition that periodontal disease(s) is caused by specific bacteria and that specific antimicrobial agents can reduce or eliminate the infection, a second paradigm has developed. This new paradigm, the "specific plaque hypothesis", focuses on reducing the specific bacteria that cause periodontal attachment loss. The contrast between the two paradigms can be succinctly stated as follows: The antimicrobial therapy reduces the cause, while the surgical therapy reduces the result of the periodontal infection. The specific plaque hypothesis has two important implications. First, with the increasing attention to evidence-based models for prevention, treatment, outcome assessment, and reimbursement of care, increasing attention and financial effort will be channeled into effective preventive and treatment methods. Second, the recent observations that periodontal infections increase the risk of specific systemic health problems, such as cardiovascular disease, argue for the prevention and elimination of these periodontal infections. This review highlights some of the evidence for the specific plaque hypothesis, and the questions that should be addressed if antimicrobial agents are to be used responsively and effectively.

Periodontal tissue disposition of azithromycin in patients affected by chronic inflammatory periodontal diseases

BACKGROUND

The recognition that periodontal diseases are associated with specific pathogens has led to interest in the use of antibacterial drugs for inhibition of these microorganisms. On these bases, the present study was aimed at evaluating the tissue distribution of the new macrolide antibiotic azithromycin in patients subjected to oral surgery for chronic inflammatory diseases of both marginal and periapical periodontium.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients were treated with azithromycin 500 mg/day orally for 3 consecutive days, and drug concentrations in plasma, saliva, normal gingiva, and pathological periodontal tissues were evaluated. For this purpose, samples of blood, saliva, normal gingiva, granulation tissue, and radicular granuloma or cyst wall (from dentigerous cyst) were collected during oral surgery or 0.5, 2.5, 4.5, and 6.5 days after the end of pharmacological treatment; then, azithromycin levels were measured by a microbiological plate assay, using Micrococcus luteus NCTC 8440 as the indicator organism.

RESULTS

The concentrations of azithromycin in plasma, saliva, normal gingiva, and pathological tissues reached the highest values 12 hours after the last dose (0.37+/-0.05 mg/l, 2.12+/-0.30 mg/l, 6.30+/-0.68 mg/kg, and 11.60+/-1.50 mg/kg, respectively) and then declined gradually. Consistent levels of the drug in normal gingiva and pathological tissues could be detected, however, up to 6.5 days, indicating that azithromycin was retained in target tissues for a long time after the end of treatment. Moreover, azithromycin levels in both normal gingiva and pathological tissues exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentrations of most pathogens involved in the pathophysiology of chronic inflammatory periodontal diseases. Notably, azithromycin levels in pathological tissues were significantly higher than those in normal gingiva 0.5, 2.5, and 4.5 days after the last dose.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results indicate a marked penetration of azithromycin into both normal and pathological periodontal tissues, suggesting that azithromycin represents a promising option in both adjunctive and prophylactic treatments of chronic inflammatory periodontal diseases.

Macrolides and changes in the oral flora

Macrolides have been used in dental practice for many years, and may have a role in treating periodontal disease. Increased numbers of antibiotic-resistant oral streptococci have been reported after administration of both penicillins and macrolides. We confirm these findings for erythromycin, josamycin and azithromycin, and show that small numbers of macrolide-resistant streptococci are part of the normal oral flora at baseline. Resistant organisms fill the vacuum created by the removal of sensitive strains by antibiotic treatment. Following treatment with azithromycin, periodontal bacterial pathogens such as black pigmented anaerobes and spirochaetes decrease, whereas numbers of oral streptococci increase. These changes in the oral flora indicate a return to a healthier oral environment. In our studies, no clinical problems resulted from the transient increase in macrolide-resistant streptococci.

Comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of azithromycin and co-amoxiclav in the treatment of acute periapical abscesses

The activity, safety and tolerability of the azalide azithromycin were compared with those of co-amoxiclav in the treatment of acute periapical abscesses in adults in an open, randomized, multicentre comparative study. Patients of either sex, recruited from 106 dental practices in Belgium, were aged between 18 and 75 years and had acute periapical abscesses not requiring drainage, confirmed by radiology. Azithromycin was administered as a 500-mg tablet orally once daily for 3 days (n = 150) and co-amoxiclav as a 625-mg capsule three times daily, for 5-10 days (n = 153). Both before and after treatment, masticatory pain, percussion pain, headache, and oedema and redness of soft tissue were graded on a four-point scale. Overall clinical success (cure plus improvement) was seen in 131/144 (91%) evaluable patients receiving azithromycin and in 142/148 (96%) receiving co-amoxiclav (difference not significant). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence or severity of adverse events or in the number of discontinuations because of adverse events.

Prevalence of HIV-associated periodontitis and chronic periodontitis in a southeastern US study group

OBJECTIVES

This study estimates factors associated with the prevalence of HIV-associated periodontal diseases (HIV-P) and the severity and extent of periodontitis in HIV-infected adults from North Carolina (NC).

METHODS

Data are derived from a cross-sectional study of HIV-infected adults (total n = 326, dentate n = 316) treated at the University of North Carolina Hospitals. Outcomes were a diagnosis of HIV-P and measures of probing pocket depth (PPD), recession (REC), and clinical attachment level (CAL). Immunosuppression was measured by peripheral blood CD4+ cells/mm3.

RESULTS

In addition to persons with HIV (non-AIDS), this study included 10 percent of the AIDS cases in North Carolina. Median age was 37 years (range = 19-67); 78 percent were male and 60 percent were black. Sixty-two percent of persons had a probing pocket depth > or = 5 mm; 46% had recession > or = 3 mm, and 66 percent had attachment level > or = 5 mm in one or more sites. Cases of HIV-P (n = 15) were rare. Persons taking HIV-antiretroviral medication were one-fifth (OR = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.07, 0.63) as likely to have HIV-P as those not taking those medications, controlling for CD4+ cell counts.

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-infected persons in this study group from North Carolina exhibited severe and extensive measures of adult periodontitis. A small proportion experienced a severe form of HIV-P, which was attenuated by antiretroviral therapy.