Low stimulation of peripheral lymphocytes, following in vitro application of Emdogain

Enamel Matrix Derivative (EMD) as an Adjunct to Non-surgical Periodontal Therapy: A Systematic Review

If left untreated, periodontitis is a chronic, irreversible disease that can contribute to tooth loss. The primary objective of periodontal treatment is to arrest the progression of the disease and restore the supporting structures of the tooth. Scaling and root planing (SRP) is a common non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) used to reduce inflammation, pocket depth, and clinical attachment loss. However, NSPT has limitations, notably in difficult-to-access deep pockets and molar furcations. Deep pockets (greater than 4 mm) frequently retain calculus following NSPT. To attain direct access, surgical periodontal therapy (SPT) is recommended, particularly for pockets deeper than 5 mm. Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) has emerged in recent years as a tool for periodontal regeneration when used in conjunction with NSP for infrabony defects. EMD may also have advantageous effects when combined with NSPT. The purpose of this review is to provide a thorough understanding of the effects of EMD as an adjunct to NSPT. The databases Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and Embase were systematically searched to identify relevant studies on the benefits of EMD and its use as an adjunct to NSPT. Incorporating EMD into NSPT reduces chair time, and 60% of studies demonstrated considerable benefits compared to SRP alone, according to the findings. On the basis of research, it can be concluded that EMD can be used as an adjunct to NSPT, thereby reducing the amount of time spent in the operating chair. In some cases, it can, therefore, be regarded as an alternative to surgical treatment.

Twenty years of enamel matrix derivative: the past, the present and the future

BACGROUND

On June 5th, 2015 at Europerio 8, a group of leading experts were gathered to discuss what has now been 20 years of documented evidence supporting the clinical use of enamel matrix derivative (EMD). Original experiments led by Lars Hammarström demonstrated that enamel matrix proteins could serve as key regenerative proteins capable of promoting periodontal regeneration including new cementum, with functionally oriented inserting new periodontal ligament fibres, and new alveolar bone formation. This pioneering work and vision by Lars Hammarström has paved the way to an enormous amount of publications related to its biological basis and clinical use. Twenty years later, it is clear that all these studies have greatly contributed to our understanding of how biologics can act as mediators for periodontal regeneration and have provided additional clinical means to support tissue regeneration of the periodontium.

AIMS

This review article aims to: (1) provide the biological background necessary to understand the rational for the use of EMD for periodontal regeneration, (2) present animal and human histological evidence of periodontal regeneration following EMD application, (3) provide clinically relevant indications for the use of EMD and (4) discuss future avenues of research including key early findings leading to the development of Osteogain, a new carrier system for EMD specifically developed with better protein adsorption to bone grafting materials.

Enamel matrix proteins exhibit growth factor activity: A review of evidence at the cellular and molecular levels

Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) is a commercially available protein extract, mainly comprising amelogenins. A number of other polypeptides have been identified in EMD, mostly growth factors, which promote cementogenesis and osteogenesis during the regeneration processes through the regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation and activity; however, not all of their functions are clear. Enamel extracts have been proposed to have numerous activities such as bone morphogenetic protein- and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β)-like activity, and activities similar to those of insulin-like growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor. These activities have been observed at the molecular and cellular levels and in numerous animal models. Furthermore, it has been suggested that EMD contains an unidentified biologically active factor that acts in combination with TGF-β1, and several studies have reported functional similarities between growth factors and TGF-β in cellular processes. The effects of enamel extracts on the cell cycle and biology are summarized and discussed in this review.

Enamel matrix derivative, inflammation and soft tissue wound healing

Over 15 years have now passed since enamel matrix derivative (EMD) emerged as an agent capable of periodontal regeneration. Following thorough investigation, evidenced-based clinical application is now established for a multitude of clinical settings to promote regeneration of periodontal hard tissues. Despite the large number of studies and review articles written on this topic, no single review has compiled the influence of EMD on tissue inflammation, an area of research that merits substantial attention in periodontology. The aim of the present review was to gather all studies that deal with the effects of EMD on tissue inflammation with particular interest in the cellular mechanisms involved in inflammation and soft tissue wound healing/resolution. The effects of EMD on monocytes, macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils, fibroblasts and endothelial cells were investigated for changes in cell behavior as well as release of inflammatory markers, including interleukins, prostaglandins, tumor necrosis factor-α, matrix metalloproteinases and members of the OPG-RANKL pathway. In summary, studies listed in this review have reported that EMD is able to significantly decrease interleukin-1b and RANKL expression, increase prostaglandin E2 and OPG expression, increase proliferation and migration of T lymphocytes, induce monocyte differentiation, increase bacterial and tissue debris clearance, as well as increase fibroplasias and angiogenesis by inducing endothelial cell proliferation, migration and capillary-like sprout formation. The outcomes from the present review article indicate that EMD is able to affect substantially the inflammatory and healing responses and lay the groundwork for future investigation in the field.

Enamel matrix derivative promotes superoxide production and chemotaxis but reduces matrix metalloproteinase-8 expression by polymorphonuclear leukocytes

BACKGROUND

Polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) is the predominant innate immune cell type activated in acute inflammation. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) on superoxide (O(2)(-)) generation, chemotaxis, and matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) secretion by PMN in vitro to better understand the role of EMD in surgical wound healing.

METHODS

PMNs were isolated from healthy volunteers (n = 14). O(2)(-) generation was measured using a cytochrome c reduction assay. Chemotaxis was measured in a modified Boyden chamber. MMP-8 secretion was analyzed by Western blotting. A relative density method was used to determine the percentage of MMP-8 released from the PMNs in relation to the total cellular MMP-8 content.

RESULTS

O(2)(-) generation was significantly elevated when PMNs were stimulated with EMD (200 μg/mL) (P <0.01). Secondary stimulation of PMNs with 1 μM N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP) triggered earlier and more sustained O(2)(-) generation with EMD. EMD significantly increased PMN chemotactic activity (P <0.05). Combined stimulation with EMD plus fMLP resulted in significantly higher chemotaxis compared to fMLP alone (P <0.05). Conversely, EMD did not induce MMP-8 secretion from PMNs. MMP-8 secretion by PMNs in response to fMLP or serum-opsonized zymosan stimulation was significantly inhibited by EMD (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

EMD has specific, differential actions on PMNs that suggest potential for enhancement of wound healing, bacterial and tissue debris clearance (O(2)(-) generation and chemotaxis), and suppression of tissue damage and degradation (MMP-8 ). Together, the data suggest that EMD enhances wound healing and reduces inflammation.

Enamel matrix protein derivatives: role in periodontal regeneration

The role of regenerative periodontal therapy is the reconstitution of lost periodontal structures, ie, new formation of root cementum, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone. The outcome of basic research has pointed to the important role of enamel matrix protein derivative (EMD) in periodontal wound healing. Histologic results from animal and human studies have shown that treatment with EMD promotes periodontal regeneration. Moreover, clinical studies have indicated that treatment with EMD positively influences periodontal wound healing in humans. The goal of this paper is to review the existing literature on EMD.

Emdogain in carcinogenesis: a systematic review of in vitro studies

Emdogain is a commercial product of unknown composition and is clinically used to induce periodontal regeneration. This study aims to review current knowledge of the in vitro effects of Emdogain on oral tissues and, in particular, factors related to carcinoma. A systematic approach was used to review studies from the Embase and Pubmed databases; a total of 76 studies were included. These comprised in vitro studies of the cytokines in, or regulated by, Emdogain and assays designed to study the effects of EMD on human cells in oral tissues or malignant cells. Several studies have shown that EMD regulates the proliferation, migration, adhesion, gene expression, and cytokine production of (pre-)osteoblasts, periodontal fibroblasts, and gingival fibroblasts. However, the effects of EMD on malignant oral cells are not well understood. EMD seems to have broad regulatory effects on malignant cells and on several carcinoma-related factors. Evidence suggests that patients with premalignant or malignant mucosal lesions should not be treated with EMD.

The application of an enamel matrix protein derivative (Emdogain) in regenerative periodontal therapy: a review

Regenerative periodontal therapy aims at reconstitution of the lost periodontal structures such as new formation of root cementum, periodontal ligament and alveolar bone. Findings from basic research indicate that enamel matrix protein derivative (EMD) has a key role in periodontal wound healing. Histological results from animal and human studies have shown that treatment with EMD promotes periodontal regeneration. Moreover, clinical studies have indicated that treatment with EMD positively influences periodontal wound healing in humans. This review aims to present an overview of evidence-based clinical indications for regenerative therapy with EMD.

Anti-inflammatory properties of enamel matrix derivative in human blood

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Enamel matrix derivative (EMD), extracted from porcine tooth buds, has been shown to promote periodontal healing in patients with severe periodontitis. This involves modulation of the inflammatory response followed by the onset of periodontal regeneration. Based on these observations, we examined the ability of EMD to modulate the release of a pro-inflammatory cytokine [tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha], an anti-inflammatory cytokine (interleukin-10) and a chemokine (interleukin- 8) in whole human blood challenged by bacterial cell wall components.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Whole blood from healthy donors was challenged by lipopolysaccharide or peptidoglycan and incubated with different concentrations of EMD or a cAMP analogue 8-(4-chlorophenyl)thio-cAMP (8-CPT-cAMP). TNF-alpha, interleukin-8 and interleukin-10 were analysed from plasma by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) while cAMP levels of peripheral blood mononuclear cell lysates were analysed by enzyme immunoassay (EIA).

RESULTS

We found that EMD attenuated the release of TNF-alpha and interleukin-8 in whole blood from healthy donors challenged by lipopolysaccharide or peptidoglycan, while the release of interleukin-10 was unchanged. Enamel matrix derivative also produced a four-fold increase in the cAMP levels of peripheral blood mononuclear cell lysates. Like EMD, 8-CPT-cAMP attenuated the formation of TNF-alpha, but not of interleukin-10, in blood challenged by lipopolysaccharide.

CONCLUSION

Enamel matrix derivative limits the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines induced by lipopolysaccharide or peptidoglycan in human blood, suggesting that it has anti-inflammatory properties. We propose that this effect of EMD is, at least partly, secondary to an increase in the intracellular levels of cAMP in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

The effect of enamel matrix derivative on gene expression in osteoblasts

Observations that amelogenins, in the form of enamel matrix derivative (EMD), have a stimulatory effect on mesenchymal cells and tissues, and on the regeneration of alveolar bone, justified investigations into the effect of EMD on bone-forming cells. The binding and uptake of EMD in primary osteoblastic cells was characterized, and the effect of EMD on osteoblast gene expression, protein secretion, and mineralization was compared with the effect of parathyroid hormone (PTH). Although no specific receptor(s) has yet been identified, EMD appeared to be taken up by osteoblasts through clathrin-coated pits via the interaction with clathrin adaptor protein complex AP-2, the major mechanism of cargo sorting into coated pits in mammalian cells. EMD had a positive effect on factors involved in mineralization in vitro, causing an increased alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in the medium as well an as increased expression of osteocalcin and collagen type 1. Several hundred genes are regulated by EMD in primary human osteoblasts. There appear to be similarities between the effects of EMD and PTH on human osteoblasts. The expression pattern of several mRNAs and proteins upon EMD stimulation also indicates a secondary osteoclast stimulatory effect, suggesting that the osteogenic effect of EMD in vivo, at least partly, involves stimulation of bone remodelling.

The effect of EmdogainR on ectopic bone formation in tubes of rat demineralized dentin matrix

BACKGROUND

Emdogain (EMD) is made from enamel matrix proteins (EMPs) from the tooth germ of swine and propylene glycol alginate (PGA) as a matrix. The function of EMD is known to differentiate cells of the dental follicle into cementoblasts. However, little is known about the effect of EMD on mesenchymal cells in other tissue.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether EMD has the ability to induce hard tissue when applied with or without demineralized dentin matrix.

METHODS

Half of the dentin tubes prepared from rat incisors were demineralized by treatment with 0.6 N hydrochloric acid for 3 h. EMD or PGA was injected into the demineralized or non-demineralized dentin tubes, which were then transplanted into rectus abdominis muscles. Untreated dentin tubes were also transplanted as a control. Animals were killed at 7, 14 and 21 days after the implantation.

RESULTS

Non-demineralized dentin tubes with or without EMD or PGA did not form any hard tissue. In the demineralized group, chondrogenesis in the PGA groups occurred earlier than in the EMD groups. The expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mRNA in the demineralized group with PGA at day 14 was the highest. The expression of osteopontin and osteocalcin mRNAs was higher in all groups at 21 days compared with 7 or 14 days.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that neither EMD nor PGA has the ability to induce hard tissue and that EMPs contained within EMD might aggregate on the dentin surface and inhibit the effect of the demineralized dentin matrix.

Position Paper: Periodontal Regeneration

Untreated periodontal disease leads to tooth loss through destruction of the attachment apparatus and tooth-supporting structures. The goals of periodontal therapy include not only the arrest of periodontal disease progression,but also the regeneration of structures lost to disease where appropriate. Conventional surgical approaches (e.g., flap debridement) continue to offer time-tested and reliable methods to access root surfaces,reduce periodontal pockets, and attain improved periodontal form/architecture. However, these techniques offer only limited potential towards recovering tissues destroyed during earlier disease phases. Recently, surgical procedures aimed at greater and more predictable regeneration of periodontal tissues and functional attachment close to their original level have been developed, analyzed, and employed in clinical practice. This paper provides a review of the current understanding of the mechanisms, cells, and factors required for regeneration of the periodontium and of procedures used to restore periodontal tissues around natural teeth. Targeted audiences for this paper are periodontists and/or researchers with an interest in improving the predictability of regenerative procedures. This paper replaces the version published in 1993.

Gene expression profiles of periodontal ligament cells treated with enamel matrix proteins in vitro: analysis using cDNA arrays

BACKGROUND

A number of procedures have been used to achieve periodontal regeneration. Recently, enamel matrix derivative (EMD) has been the subject of significant basic and clinical investigations. The precise molecular events involved in EMD modulation of periodontal wound healing are not completely understood; however, cDNA microarray technology may enable rapid and accurate examination of EMD-mediated changes in gene expression in periodontal ligament (PDL) cells in vitro. The present study was undertaken to explore the selective effects of EMD on the activities of 268 cytokine, growth factor, and receptor genes in PDL.

METHODS

PDL cells were cultured in the absence and presence of EMD at a concentration of 100 microg/ml for 4 days. RNA was extracted and used to generate labeled cDNA probes. These were hybridized to cDNA arrays comprising 268 genes and exposed to x-ray films. Autoradiographs were digitized and analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-six percent (125 of 268) of the tested genes were found to be expressed by the PDL cells. Of these 125 genes, 38 were differentially expressed by PDL cells which had been cultured in the presence of EMD. Among the 38, 12 were found to be downregulated, notably mostly inflammatory genes, whereas 26 genes demonstrated upregulation, many of these coding for growth factors and growth factor receptors.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study has shown that EMD down-regulates the expression of genes involved in the early inflammatory phases of wound healing while simultaneously upregulating genes encoding growth and repair-promoting molecules. This may partly explain the apparent efficacy of EMD application in periodontal regeneration.

Clinical and Radiographic Effects of Enamel Matrix Derivative in the Treatment of Intrabony Periodontal Defects: A 12-Month Longitudinal Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial in Adult Periodontitis Patients

BACKGROUND

This randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluated the effect of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) on clinical and radiographic parameters of periodontal intrabony defects.

METHODS

A split-mouth design was used in 16 chronic periodontitis patients who had similar defects (> or =6 mm of probing depth). Both groups underwent scaling and root planing and were acid-etched with EDTA. The test sites received the EMD solution and the controls a placebo. Clinical examinations of all 16 patients and radiographs of 14 patients were available at baseline and 6 and 12 months after surgery. Clinical outcomes included probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL); radiographic analysis was performed using computerized linear measurements. Intergroup comparisons were performed by paired samples t test, and over time comparisons were made by general linear model (alpha = 0.05).

RESULTS

A statistically significant improvement over time for PD and CAL and a decrease of the vertical component of the defect was detected in both groups. Comparisons between groups revealed at baseline a mean+/-SD value of CAL of 12.93+/-2.00 and 13.47+/-2.93 for test and control groups, respectively. These values decreased to 10.92+/-1.92 and 11.31+/-1.86 after 12 months for test and control. No statistically significant differences could be observed between groups. PD displayed similar results from 7.57+/-1.02 and 7.38+/-1.16 for test and control groups at baseline to 3.40+/-1.82 and 2.99+/-1.07 after 12 months. If the data are divided into smokers and non-smokers, no differences are observed.

CONCLUSION

Use of EMD did not result in more improvement in clinical and radiographic parameters compared to the placebo.

The use of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of periodontal defects: a literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Periodontal disease results in the loss of the attachment apparatus. In the last three decades, an increasing effort has been placed on seeking procedures and materials to promote the regeneration of this tissue. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the effect of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) during regenerative procedures. In addition, a meta-analysis is presented regarding the clinical results during regeneration with EMD, to gain evidence as to what can be accomplished following treatment of intrabony defects with EMD in terms of probing depth reduction, clinical attachment level gain, defect fill (using re-entry studies), and radiographic parameters.

METHODS

The review includes in vitro and in vivo studies as well as human case reports, clinical comparative trials, and histologic findings. In addition, a meta-analysis is presented regarding the regenerative clinical results. For this purpose, we used 28 studies-including 955 intrabony defects treated with EMD that presented baseline and final data on probing depth, clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, or bone gain-to calculate weighted mean changes in the different parameters. The selected studies were pooled from the MEDLINE database at the end of May, 2003.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis of intrabony defects treated with EMD resulted in a mean initial probing depth of 7.94 +/- 0.05 mm that was reduced to 3.63 +/- 0.04 mm (p = 0.000). The mean clinical attachment level changed from 9.4 +/- 0.06 mm to 5.82 +/- 0.07 mm (p = 0.000). These results were significantly better than the results obtained for either open-flap debridement (OFD) or guided tissue regeneration (GTR). In contrast, histologically, GTR is more predictable than EMD in terms of bone and cementum formation. No advantage was found for combining EMD and GTR. Xenograft, or EMD and xenograft, yielded inferior results compared with EMD alone, but a limited number of studies evaluated this issue. Promising results were noted for the combination of allograft materials and EMD.

CONCLUSIONS

EMD seems to be safe, was able to regenerate lost periodontal tissues in previously diseased sites based on clinical parameters, and was better than OFD or GTR. Its combination with allograft materials may be of additional benefit but still needs to be further investigated.

Effect of Enamel Matrix Derivative (Emdogain) on Bone Defects in Rabbit Tibias

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of an enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain, Biora, AB, Malmö, Sweden) on bone healing. Ten New Zealand rabbits, weighing about 2.5 kg, were used. One 8-mm bone defect was created in each tibia. The defect on the right leg was filled with Emdogain, whereas the defect on the opposite leg was left unfilled as control. A total of 20 defects were created. Five rabbits each were killed at 4 and 8 weeks with an overdose of Tanax. Block sections containing the defects were retrieved and the specimens processed for light microscopy examination. The slides were stained with acid and basic fuchsin and toluidine blue. Histologically, no differences were noted in both groups at each observation period; in the test group, remnants of the implanted Emdogain were not present at 4 weeks. Newly formed bone was detectable in both groups at all observation times. At 8 weeks, both groups showed mature bone, and in the test group the material implanted was not visible. No inflammatory cells were visible in both groups. In conclusion, our results indicate that Emdogain implanted in bone defects is fully resorbed after 4 to 8 weeks and does not adversely affect bone formation.

Enamel matrix derivative exhibits angiogenic effect in vitro and in a murine model

OBJECTIVES

Angiogenesis is one of the most critical events in the wound healing process. Any increase in angiogenesis could result in more rapid and complete healing. A recent study found that enamel matrix derivative (EMD) could accelerate early periodontal wound healing. We wanted to clarify whether EMD caused an angiogenic effect and, thus, possibly enhanced wound healing.

METHODS

We performed in vitro proliferation and chemotaxis assays on human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) cultures, and a tissue culture assay using blood vessel fragments in fibrin gel. Collagen membranes soaked with EMD were implanted subcutaneously in mice to test the in vivo angiogenic effect.

RESULTS

While there were no significant differences between the negative control and EMD groups in the proliferation assay, EMD treatment did exhibit a significantly greater dose-dependent chemotactic effect on HUVEC than control group treatments. The tissue culture in fibrin gel showed new blood vessel outgrowths in the EMD groups, but none in the negative control group. In the animal studies, significantly more endothelial cells were detected in the EMD group of mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that EMD does exhibit some angiogenic effects. However, the underlying molecules and mechanisms are still unidentified. We discuss several possibilities.

Treatment of intrabony periodontal defects with enamel matrix derivative: a literature review

The enamel matrix derivative (EMD) has been recently introduced in the periodontal field to overcome short-comings associated with currently available regenerative techniques. Information accumulated over the past years with application of EMD guided regeneration (EGR) in intrabony periodontal defects allowed a thorough evidence-based retrospective analysis. Clinical data from EMD controlled studies were pooled for meta-analysis and weighted according to the number of treated defects. Clinical attachment gain amounted to 3.2 +/- 0.9 mm (33% of the original attachment level) and probing reduction averaged 4.0 +/- 0.9 mm (50% of the baseline probing depth) for a total of 317 lesions with a mean baseline depth of 5.4 +/- 0.8 mm. Improvements in clinical parameters achieved with EMD were statistically significant in reference to preoperative measurements. However, despite the overall efficacy of EGR therapy, a significant variation in clinical outcomes was observed. Similar therapeutic results were reported in studies where EGR was compared directly to guided tissue regeneration. However, the controlled clinical trials did not have adequate statistical power to firmly support superiority or equivalency between the 2 regenerative therapies. The statistical superiority of EGR over treatment with open flap debridement has been established. Preliminary histologic investigations with surgically created defects and experimental periodontal lesions demonstrated the ability of EGR to induce formation of acellular cementum and promote significant anaplasis of the supporting periodontal tissues. The potential of EMD to encourage periodontal regeneration was also confirmed in human intrabony defects. However, recent human histologic studies have questioned both the consistency of the histologic outcomes and the ability of EGR to predictably stimulate formation of acellular cementum. Identifying clinical modifying parameters and understanding cellular interactions are apparently essential for the development of methodologies to enhance predictability and extent of EGR clinical and histologic results.

Study of a chitin-based gel as injectable material in periodontal surgery

The optimal conditions of injection of a chitin gel for applications in periodontal surgery have been studied as a function of various parameters. They correspond to a time of 2 min 15s (+/- 15"). They are achieved for acetylation parameters corresponding to: a molar ratio acetic anhydride/glucosamine residue, R = 1.5, a temperature of the master solution of 12 degrees C, a mixture of hydroalcoholic solution/acetylating reactive stirred for 45s at room temperature and a chitin concentration of 3.6%. This concentration allows us to limit the syneresis. to improve the mechanical properties of the gel and to obtain a viscosity suitable for the injection. Doping of the gel by means of chitosan powder insoluble under these conditions allows us to consider an improvement of the biological activity of the gel.

Application of enamel matrix derivative in autotransplantation of an impacted maxillary premolar: a case report

BACKGROUND

The success of tooth transplantation or replantation depends on the viability of periodontal ligament in the planted tooth. Mechanical injury to periodontal tissues frequently results in dental root resorption and dental ankylosis, which leads to the failure of transplantation or replantation. Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) has been recently used to induce periodontal regeneration. In this report, we show a clinical case of EMD application in the transplantation of an inversely impacted and immature tooth.

METHODS

An impacted second premolar was found in the right maxilla of a 16 year-old girl. The tooth was inversely impacted and the dental root was incomplete. When transplantation was carried out, EMD was applied to the periodontal tissues of the extracted premolar. The tooth was fixed at the correct position and the clinical condition was followed for evaluation for 6 months.

RESULTS

Radiographs after 3 months exhibited new bone formation surrounding the transplanted tooth. After 6 months, considerable growth of dental root was evident, periodontal ligament-like radiolucency appeared, the vital reaction of the planted tooth was detected, and there were no signs of root resorption or ankylosis.

CONCLUSION

Short-term results from this case indicate that EMD application was effective in the transplantation of an inversely impacted and immature tooth and that EMD might contribute to the growth of dental root and to the prevention of ankylosis.

Is there more to enamel matrix proteins than biomineralization?

Enamel proteins are proteins synthesized by ameloblast cells. These proteins are secreted into the enamel extracellular matrix where they nucleate and regulate the growth of hydroxyapatite crystals to form the mineralized enamel covering the crown of the teeth. Although the exact role of these proteins in enamel mineralization is just beginning to be elucidated, new studies suggest that these proteins might have functions outside enamel formation. Furthermore, extracts of enamel proteins are currently being used to regenerate periodontal tissues destroyed by periodontal disease and new studies suggest that they might have chondrogenic and osteogenic properties. These new functions of enamel proteins will be the focus of this review.

Enamel matrix derivative prolongs primary osteoblast growth

Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) secreted by cells of the epithelial root sheath plays an important role in cementogenesis and periodontal tissue formation. The mechanisms by which EMD influences cell function are not known. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of EMD on cell growth of primary mouse osteoblasts. Osteoblasts were digested from 6- to 8-day-old mouse calvaria and plated into 6-well cell culture plates at an initial density of 5000 cells/cm2. After 24-h incubation with Dulbecco's modified eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, cells were incubated in three different groups of media: DMEM only as control, DMEM with 25 microg/ml EMD, and DMEM with 100 microg/ml EMD. At days 3, 7, 10, and 14, the total cell number per well was calculated, and cell morphology was examined. At each observation period the number of cells in the EMD groups was significantly greater (ANOVA, p < 0.01) than that in the control group. EMD had a greater effect on osteoblast survivor in the higher concentration than in the lower concentration. Furthermore normal morphology of the primary osteoblasts was maintained in the EMD groups. These results suggest that EMD prolongs primary osteoblast growth and may have an effect on osteoblasts during periodontal regeneration.

Clinical evaluation of wound healing following multiple exposures to enamel matrix protein derivative in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects

BACKGROUND

Multiple exposures to enamel matrix protein derivative (EMD) during periodontal therapy have been shown to be safe for the patient. The purpose of this study was to clinically determine if an altered course of wound healing would occur after multiple exposures to EMD in the treatment of intrabony defects. A secondary aim was to assess the efficacy of EMD in probing depth reduction and clinical attachment level gain.

METHODS

Thirty-two systemically healthy patients (18 females, 14 males, 33 to 69 years old) who were being treated for moderate to advanced periodontal disease were selected for the study. Surgical procedures involving 2 sites were separated by at least 8 weeks, and wound healing comparisons were made between the first and second procedure. Patients were given a diary card the day of surgery, which consisted of questions concerning the presence and severity of headaches, root hypersensitivity, tooth pain, swelling, and itching. Patients were also examined at postoperative visits to clinically assess wound healing and discuss responses to the questionnaire. Soft tissue measurements were taken the day of surgery and 6 months postoperatively to ascertain probing depth reduction (PD) and gains in clinical attachment levels (CAL).

RESULTS

The results revealed no clinically detectable reaction that could not be attributed to normal postoperative sequelae. There were no differences in reported symptoms between patient gender, first and second procedures, or intrabony and non-intrabony defects. Smokers were found to have a statistically significantly higher incidence of severe symptoms in root hypersensitivity, tooth pain, and swelling compared to non-smokers (n = 21). The mean probing depth reduction was 3.8 +/- 1.5 mm (2 to 9 mm), while the mean clinical attachment level gain was 2.8 +/- 1.7 mm (0 to 8 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study demonstrate that EMD is a clinically safe product to use in the treatment of periodontal defects and that multiple uses do not have a negative impact on periodontal wound healing. In addition, a statistically significant gain in clinical attachment and reduction in probing depth were demonstrated.

Porcine fetal enamel matrix derivative enhances bone formation induced by demineralized freeze dried bone allograft in vivo

BACKGROUND

Embryonic enamel matrix proteins are involved in the formation of acellular cementum during development of the periodontal attachment apparatus, suggesting that these proteins might be used clinically to promote periodontal regeneration. At present, it is unknown if these proteins are osteoinductive, osteoconductive, or osteopromotive. To address this question, we examined the ability of a commercially prepared embryonic porcine enamel matrix derivative to induce new bone formation in nude mouse calf muscle, or to enhance the bone induction ability of a demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA).

METHODS

Porcine fetal enamel matrix derivative (EMD) was implanted bilaterally in the calf muscle of 4 male Nu/Nu mice per treatment group (N = 8 implants): 2 mg EMD alone; 4 mg EMD alone; inactive human DFDBA alone; inactive DFDBA + 2 mg EMD; inactive DFDBA + 4 mg EMD; active DFDBA alone; active DFDBA + 2 mg EMD; and active DFDBA + 4 mg EMD. Implants were harvested after 56 days and examined histologically for bone induction using a semi-quantitative score and histomorphometrically for area of new bone, cortical bone, bone marrow, and residual DFDBA.

RESULTS

Implants containing inactive DFDBA, 2 mg EMD, 4 mg EMD, and inactive DFDBA + 2 or 4 mg EMD did not induce new bone. Active DFDBA and active DFDBA + 2 mg EMD induced new bone to a similar extent. In contrast, active DFDBA + 4 mg EMD resulted in enhanced bone induction, area of new bone, and cortical bone. Residual DFDBA was also increased in this group.

CONCLUSIONS

EMD is not osteoinductive. However, it is osteopromotive, due in part to its osteoconductive properties, but a threshold concentration is required.