Immunohistochemical demonstration of bone morphogenetic protein in odontogenic tumors

Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor: A histopathologic profile of 43 cases with evidence supporting a mixed odontogenic origin

BACKGROUND

Adenomatoid Odontogenic Tumor (AOT) accounts for 3% of all odontogenic tumors. It has been classified by WHO as an odontogenic tumor of purely epithelial origin. The current study attempts to establish the origin of the tumor along with detailed histopathological and clinicoradiographic analysis of 43 cases of AOT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-three cases were reviewed from the departmental archives for demographic data, radiographic features and histological features. Further, histopathological slides were stained with Picrosirius Red (PSR) and observed under polarised light.

RESULTS

A majority of the cases were seen in the anterior jaws (76.7%), and were less than 3 cms (76.7%) in greatest dimension. Equal number of cases were of follicular and extra-follicular location while one was peripheral. Predominantly solid histological pattern was noted in 53.5%. Varied sub-patterns were observed with most cases exhibiting solid nodules and strands of tumor cells. Few cases showed melanin pigmentation. Over a third of cases (37.2%) showed dentigerous cyst like areas and one case each showed features of ossifying fibroma and focal cemento-osseous dysplasia. Tumor droplets, hyaline rings within duct-like structures, dentinoid material and osteodentin showed reddish yellow birefringence when observed under polarised microscopy post PSR staining.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the diverse histopathological variation of AOT with evidence to reclassify it as a mixed odontogenic tumor based on the polarising microscopic findings with PSR staining.

Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor: evidence for a mixed odontogenic tumor

OBJECTIVE

Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor (AOT) was classified by the World Health Organization as a mixed odontogenic tumor in 1992 and reclassified without a clear rationale as an epithelium-only tumor in 2005. The purpose of this study was to investigate if there was any evidence to suggest AOT might be a mixed odontogenic tumor.

STUDY DESIGN

Immunohistochemical studies with nestin, dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP), cytokeratin, and vimentin were performed using 21 cases of AOT, and the staining results were analyzed according to the various morphologic patterns seen in AOT. Sirius red stain was used to detect the presence of collagen types I and III in AOT products.

RESULTS

Our results showed that 20 of 21 (95.23%), 0 of 21 (0%), 21 of 21 (100%), and 20 of 21 (95.23%) cases expressed nestin, DSPP, cytokeratin, and vimentin, respectively. Some cells in rosette/duct-like structures (RDSs) expressed nestin, vimentin, or both, without cytokeratin. Coexpression of vimentin and cytokeratin or of nestin, cytokeratin, and vimentin was noted in some cells. Sirius red staining was positive in eosinophilic products in RDSs, double-layered spheres, and dentinoids.

CONCLUSION

Although most AOT cells appear epithelial, there is a small population of cells expressing mesenchymal proteins and secreting collagen types I and III. This evidence suggests that AOT is a mixed odontogenic tumor.

Analysis of Protein Immunoexpression and Its Interrelationship in the Pathogenesis of Odontomas and Ameloblastic Fibro-Odontomas: A Systematic Review

Odontomas and ameloblastic fibro-odontomas (AFOs) are the result of a developmental anomaly of odontogenic tissues. A literature review of proteins immunoexpressed in odontomas and AFOs was conducted in order to determine which proteins are involved in the pathogenesis of these lesions. AFO was changed to early odontoma in the 2017 WHO classification and will also be discussed in this article. A literature search was performed in the following electronic databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, Lilacs, Cochrane Collaboration Library, and Science Direct. The research question was developed according to the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) framework: Which proteins are related to the differentiation of odontomas and what is their interrelationship with AFOs? Thirty articles met all inclusion criteria and were selected for this systematic review, totaling 355 cases of odontomas and 43 cases of AFO. Similar immunoexpression was observed in odontomas and AFOs. Immunoexpression of proteins involved in cell differentiation was higher in compound odontomas than in complex odontomas. Proteins involved in histodifferentiation and enamel formation were more frequent in odontomas. The immunoexpression of enamel matrix proteins differs between odontomas and tooth germs, with their persistence being related to the development of odontomas. Compound odontomas exhibit the highest immunoexpression of proteins involved in cellular histodifferentiation and the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway is involved in tumor formation.

Evaluation and Immunolocalization of BMP4 and FGF8 in Odontogenic Cyst and Tumors

Growth factors like bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4) and fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF8) play a major role in organogenesis and specifically in odontogenesis. They are also believed to have a role in oncogenesis. Thus, any discrepancies in their standard behavior and activity would lead to serious abnormalities including odontogenic cyst and tumors. The present research work investigated the expression of BMP4 and FGF8 in odontogenic tumors (OT) and cyst as well as developing tooth germs to elucidate their roles. Dental organs of various odontogenic stages and 30 OTs including solid multicystic ameloblastomas (SMA, 10 cases), ameloblastic fibroma (AF, 10 cases), odontogenic myxoma (OM, 10 cases), and odontogenic cysts: odontogenic keratocyst (OKC, 10 cases) were evaluated in both epithelial and mesenchymal components for the expression of BMP4 and FGF8 using immunohistochemistry. The epithelial nuclear expression of BMP4 was highest in OKC (9 cases) while FGF8 was highest in SMA (10 cases). The mesenchymal nuclear expression of both BMP4 (8 cases) (p = 0.001) and FGF8 (9 cases) (p = 0.045) were significantly high in OMs among all OTs. Both growth factors were actively expressed in different stages of tooth development. The expression of BMP4 and FGF8 corelates well with the proliferative component of the pathologies, indicating a possible role in the pathogenesis and progression.

Functional expression of BMP7 receptors in oral epithelial cells. Interleukin-17F production in response to BMP7

BACKGROUND

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are members of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily. Recently, BMP7 has been demonstrated to be produced by salivary glands and contribute to embryonic branching in mice. The BMP7 in saliva is thought to be delivered to the oral cavity and is expected to contact with stratified squamous epithelial cells which line the surface of oral mucosa. In this study, we attempted to investigate the effects of BMP7 on oral epithelial cells.

METHODS

The expression of BMP receptors was examined by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). OSCCs were stimulated with human recombinant BMP7 (hrBMP7) and the phosphorylation status of Smad1/5/8 was examined by western blotting. For microarray analysis, Ca9-22 cells were stimulated with 100 ng/mL of hrBMP7 and total RNA was extracted and subjected to real-time PCR. The 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) of IL-17 F gene was cloned to pGL4-basic vector and used for luciferase assay. Ca9-22 cells were pre-incubated with DM3189, a specific inhibitor of Smad1/5/8, for inhibition assay.

RESULTS

All isoforms of type I and type II BMP receptors were expressed in both Ca9-22 and HSC3 cells and BMP7 stimulation resulted in the phosphorylation of Smad1/5/8 in both cell lines. The microarray analysis revealed the induction of interleukin-17 F (IL-17 F), netrin G2 (NTNG2) and hyaluronan synthase 1 (HAS1). Luciferase assay using the 5'-UTR of the IL-17 F gene revealed transcriptional regulation. Induced IL-17 F production was further confirmed at the protein level by ELISA. Smad1/5/8 inhibitor pretreatment decreased IL-17 F expression levels in the cells.

Immunoexpression of BMP-2 and BMP-4 and their receptors, BMPR-IA and BMPR-II, in ameloblastomas and adenomatoid odontogenic tumors

OBJECTIVES

The present study evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of BMP-2 and BMP-4 and of their receptors (BMPR-IA and BMPR-II) in solid ameloblastoma (SA), unicystic ameloblastoma (UA) and adenomatoid odontogenic tumor (AOT) in order to obtain a better understanding of their role in the development and biological behavior of these tumors.

DESIGN

This study analyzed these proteins in 30 cases of SA, 10 cases of UA, and 30 cases of AOT. Immunoexpression was evaluated in the parenchyma and stroma by attributing the following scores: 0, no stained cells; 1, ≤10%; 2, >10% and ≤25%; 3, >25% and ≤50%; 4, >50% and ≤75%.; 5, >75% stained cells.

RESULTS

In SAs, positive correlations were observed between the stromal and parenchymal expression of BMP-2 (p<0.001) and between the stromal expression of BMP-2 and BMP-4 (p=0.020), as well as between the stromal expression of BMPR-II and BMP-4 (p=0.001) and the stromal and parenchymal expression of BMPR-II (p<0.001). In UAs, correlations were detected between the stromal and parenchymal expression of BMP-4 (p=0.035) and between the stromal expression of BMP-4 and BMPR-IA (p=0.022). In AOTs, analysis of immunoexpression in the parenchyma revealed positive correlations between all proteins.

CONCLUSION

BMPs and their receptors play an important role in the differentiation and development of ameloblastomas and AOTs, but may not explain the different biological behaviors of these lesions. The positive correlation observed in AOTs might be related to the formation of mineralized material in this tumor.

Effects of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 7 (rhBMP-7) on the behaviour of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary in vitro study

We investigated the effects of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7 (rhBMP-7) on the behaviour of oral keratinocytes and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cells in vitro. Expression of all three BMP receptors was high (p<0.01), and rhBMP-7 exhibited significant dose-related inhibitory effects on the doubling time and viability of cancer cells (p<0.01), but not on the proliferation or viability of oral keratinocytes. It elicited no significant effect on the invasion of Matrigel in SCC of the head and neck. Results indicate that in cell culture, rhBMP-7 exerts antineoplastic effects. This should be tested in an orthotopic animal model to more closely replicate in vivo effects.

Oxytalan-positive peripheral ossifying fibromas express runt-related transcription factor 2, bone morphogenetic protein-2, and cementum attachment protein. An immunohistochemical study

BACKGROUND

The peripheral ossifying fibroma (POF) represents one of the most common lesions of the periodontal tissues that may originate from the gingival soft tissues, the periosteum, or the periodontal ligament.

AIM

To investigate the immunohistochemical expression of runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx-2), bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), and cementum attachment protein (CAP) in oxytalan-positive POF, to establish the use of POF as an in vivo model for the study of the periodontal ligament.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty tumors that presented clinical and histologic features of POF, as well as oxytalan fibers, were included in the study. Immunohistochemical expression of Runx-2, BMP-2, and CAP was evaluated by light microscopy.

RESULTS

Runx-2, BMP-2, and CAP were abundantly expressed by POFs; 22 of 30 tumors expressed positive staining for Runx-2, twenty-six tumors for BMP-2, and twenty-five tumors for CAP. The expression of Runx-2 was abundant in POFs where bone was histologically present (P = 0.04) and of BMP-2 in POFs where dystrophic calcifications were present (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

It is suggested that oxytalan-positive POFs, purportedly originating from the periodontal ligament, express molecules that are specific to bone and cementum (Runx-2, BMP-2), or cementum only (CAP). Thus, the cell populations present in the lesion belong to the mineralized-tissue-forming cell lineages, the cementoblastic or osteoblastic lineage.

TGF-β1, Smad-2/-3, Smad-1/-5/-8, and Smad-4 signaling factors are expressed in ameloblastomas, adenomatoid odontogenic tumors, and calcifying cystic odontogenic tumors: an immunohistochemical study

OBJECTIVES

The TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway regulates diverse cellular functions, including tooth development, and is involved in numerous pathological processes such as tumorigenesis. The aim of this study was to investigate the immunoexpression of the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway members in ameloblastoma (AM), calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor (CCOT), and adenomatoid odontogenic tumor (AOT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study included 65 tissue specimens: 34 AMs, 13 CCOTs, and 18 AOTs. Serial sections were immunohistochemically stained with TGF-β1, Smad-4, Smad-1/-5/-8, and Smad-2/-3 antibodies, and a semiquantitative measurement of the positive cells was carried out by two oral pathologists using a 0-3 scale (0: no immunoreactivity, 1: <20% positive cells, 2: 20-50% positive cells, 3: >50% positive cells).

RESULTS

All biomarkers studied were found significantly decreased in AM compared to CCOT and AOT. AOT and CCOT expressed Smad-1/-5/-8 more strongly compared to AM (OR = 11.66, P < 0.001 and OR = 5.34, P = 0.013, respectively), and Smad-2/-3 immunostaining was found significantly increased in CCOT (OR = 10.42, P = 0.001) and AOT (OR = 5.16, P < 0.004) compared to AM. Similarly, Smad-4 was expressed more strongly in AOT and CCOT compared to AM (P = 0.001), while AOT demonstrated a fivefold higher chance to express TGF-β1 compared to AM (P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway is activated in AM, AOT, and CCOT. The statistically significant reduced TGF-β1/Smad immunoexpression in AM compared to AOT/CCOT could be associated with the more aggressive biological behavior of AM including increased cell proliferation and reduced apoptosis and differentiation. Thus, the biomarkers TGF-β, Smad-4, Smad-1/-5/-8, and Smad-2/-3 could serve as supplementary diagnostic indices between odontogenic tumors of high and low neoplastic dynamics.

Comparative study of LHX8 expression between odontoma and dental tissue-derived stem cells

BACKGROUND

LHX8 (LIM-homeobox gene 8) is known as an important regulating factor in tooth morphogenesis. Odontoma is a mixed odontogenic tumor where epithelium and mesenchyme differentiated together, resulting in anomalous tooth structures. In this study, gene and protein expressions of LHX8 were analyzed in human odontoma-derived mesenchymal cells (HODC) compared to adult dental mesenchymal stem cells (aDSC), as well as morphological and histological characteristics of odontoma were analyzed.

METHODS

aDSCs were isolated from normal teeth, and HODCs were isolated from surgically removed odontoma mass. Morphological and histological evaluations were performed to compare between compound odontomas and normal premolars. RT-PCR and real-time PCR were performed to identify LHX8 mRNA expression in the HODCs and aDSCs. LHX8 protein expression levels were observed by immunoblotting and immunofluorescent staining.

RESULTS

The compound odontoma was composed of multiple tooth-like structures, which contained disorganized but recognizable enamel matrix, dentin, pulp, and cementum. LHX8 mRNA and LHX8 protein expressions were all higher in HODCs compared to those in aDSCs examined by RT-PCR, immunoblot, and immunofluorescent staining. Especially, real-time PCR showed 2.77-fold higher LHX8 expression in HODCs than in normal periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs), while alveolar bone marrow stem cells (ABMSCs) expressed 0.12-fold LHX8 than PDLSCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these observations, LHX8 might play an important role in odontoma formation. This is the first report regarding the comparison of LHX8 expression between HODC and normal aDSCs and its overexpression in human samples. The specific mechanism of LHX8 in odontoma morphogenesis awaits further study.

An immunohistochemical evaluation of BMP-2, -4, osteopontin, osteocalcin and PCNA between ossifying fibromas of the jaws and peripheral cemento-ossifying fibromas on the gingiva

The present study examined histological difference between ossifying fibromas (OF, n=5) and peripheral cemento-ossifying fibromas (PCOF, n=7). Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP)-2 and -4, osteopontin (OPN), osteocalcin (OCN) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) were used for the immunohistochemical examinations. Oxytalan fibers present at the periodontal tissue were stained to determine the tumor cell origin. Many OFs showed high immunohistochemical reactions for BMP-2, -4 and OPN compared to those of PCOFs. PCNA index (IP) of OFs was significantly higher than that of PCOFs. All the PCOFs showed a high expression of oxytalan fibers. Only two OFs exhibited a small number of oxytalan fibers. These results suggest that PCOF has only little ability to form hard tissue and seems to be a reactive lesion. The expression of oxytalan fibers reveals that OF does not only originate from periodontal tissue.

Expression of bone morphogenetic proteins and their associated molecules in ameloblastomas and adenomatoid odontogenic tumors

OBJECTIVE

To further clarify the roles of regulators of embryonic development, bone morphogenetic protein (BMPs) and their associated molecules, in oncogenesis and cytodifferentiation of odontogenic tumors, the expression of these regulator molecules were analyzed in epithelial odontogenic tumors as well as in tooth germs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tooth germs, ameloblastomas, adenomatoid odontogenic tumors, and malignant ameloblastomas were examined by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry for detection of BMP-2, -4, -7, BMP receptors I and II (BMPR-I, BMPR-II), core-binding factor alpha1 (CBFA1), and osterix.

RESULTS

mRNA expression of BMPs, BMPRs, CBFA1, and osterix was detected in all odontogenic tissues. Immunohistochemical reactivity for BMPs, BMPRs, and CBFA1 was detected in both epithelial and mesenchymal cells of tooth germs and epithelial odontogenic tumors. BMPs and BMPRs were evidently expressed in odontogenic epithelial cells in tooth germs and epithelial odontogenic tumors. Acanthomatous ameloblastomas showed increased BMP-7 reactivity in keratinizing cells. Nuclear CBFA1 expression was detected scatteredly in odontogenic epithelial cells in normal and neoplastic odontogenic tissues, as well as in some mesenchymal cells in tooth germs and in some stromal cells in epithelial odontogenic tumors. Ameloblastic carcinomas showed low reactivity for BMPs, BMPRs, and CBFA1.

CONCLUSION

BMPs and their associated molecules might play a role in cytodifferentiation of normal and neoplastic odontogenic epithelium via epithelial-mesenchymal interactions.

Molecular pathology of odontogenic tumors

Odontogenic tumors are lesions derived from the elements of the tooth-forming apparatus and are found exclusively within the jawbones. This review represents a contemporary outline of our current understanding of the molecular and genetic alterations associated with the development and progression of odontogenic tumors, including oncogenes, tumor-suppressor genes, oncoviruses, growth factors, telomerase, cell cycle regulators, apoptosis-related factors, regulators of tooth development, hard tissue-related proteins, cell adhesion molecules, matrix-degrading proteinases, angiogenic factors, and osteolytic cytokines. It is hoped that better understanding of related molecular mechanisms will help to predict the course of odontogenic tumors and lead to the development of new therapeutic concepts for their management.

Morphoregulation of teeth: modulating the number, size, shape and differentiation by tuning Bmp activity

During development and evolution, the morphology of ectodermal organs can be modulated so that an organism can adapt to different environments. We have proposed that morphoregulation can be achieved by simply tilting the balance of molecular activity. We test the principles by analyzing the effects of partial downregulation of Bmp signaling in oral and dental epithelia of the keratin 14-Noggin transgenic mouse. We observed a wide spectrum of tooth phenotypes. The dental formula changed from 1.0.0.3/1.0.0.3 to 1.0.0.2(1)/1.0.0.0. All mandibular and M3 maxillary molars were selectively lost because of the developmental block at the early bud stage. First and second maxillary molars were reduced in size, exhibited altered crown patterns, and failed to form multiple roots. In these mice, incisors were not transformed into molars. Histogenesis and differentiation of ameloblasts and odontoblasts in molars and incisors were abnormal. Lack of enamel caused misocclusion of incisors, leading to deformation and enlargement in size. Therefore, subtle differences in the level, distribution, and timing of signaling molecules can have major morphoregulatory consequences. Modulation of Bmp signaling exemplifies morphoregulation hypothesis: simple alteration of key signaling pathways can be used to transform a prototypical conical-shaped tooth into one with complex morphology. The involvement of related pathways and the implication of morphoregulation in tooth evolution are discussed.

Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor of the mandible: review of the literature and report of a rare case

Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor (AOT) is a rare odontogenic tumor which is often misdiagnosed as odontogenic cyst. To acquire additional information about AOT, all reports regarding AOT and cited in "pubmed" since 1990 onward were reviewed. AOT accounts for about 1% until 9% of all odontogenic tumors. It is predominantly found in young and female patients, located more often in the maxilla in most cases associated with an uneruppted permanent tooth. For radiological diagnose the intraoral periapical radiograph seems to be more useful than panoramic. However, AOT frequently resemble other odontogenic lesions such as dentigerous cysts or ameloblastoma. Immunohistochemically AOT is characterized by positive reactions with certain cytokeratins. Treatment is conservative and the prognosis is excellent. For illustration a rare case of an AOT in the mandible is presented.

mRNA expression and phenotype of odontogenic tumours in the v-Ha-ras transgenic mouse

Ameloblastomas are the most common odontogenic neoplasia in humans, and although typically considered locally invasive and benign, frequently recur subsequent to surgical resection. The Tg.AC transgenic mouse carrying the v-Ha-ras oncogene has been found to spontaneously develop ameloblastoma-like tumours (35% by 1 year of age) that are rare in the wild type FVB background strain.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to characterise the mRNA expression of genes in the mouse tumours that are either expressed in human ameloblastomas or essential for normal odontogenesis and to correlate the expression to the histological phenotype.

STUDY METHODS

Histological, immunohistochemical and RT-PCR studies were used to evaluate clinically demonstrable odontogenic tumours occurring spontaneously in seven Tg.AC v-Ha-ras transgenic mice (homozygous, at 7 months of age or heterozygous at 11 months of age).

RESULTS

Most genes profiled were expressed in all tumour samples, however three (amelogenin, matrix metalloproteinase-20 (MMP-20) and Dlx7) displayed differential expression. In addition, only the most highly differentiated tumour stained positively for collagen. In most cases, the variable expression could be explained by reference to the histological phenotype, although differences in gene expression were apparent within the Type 2 and the mixed phenotype tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm that many of the genes thought to be important in odontogenesis and odontogenic tumour formation in humans are also expressed in these murine ameloblastoma-like tumours however genes associated with terminal differentiation of ameloblasts demonstrate differential expression between the tumour phenotypes.

[Revision of the 1992 edition of the WHO histological typing of odontogenic tumors. A suggestion]

The WHO classification of odontogenic tumors (1992, OT) was revised. The following main changes were proposed: (1) OT are not only "related to" odontogenic tissues but are derived from these; (2) the stroma of the epithelial tumor group (1.1.1) is of a fibrous nature and does not contain any ectomesenchymal component; (3) subtypes of ameloblastomas have to be differentiated (intra-, extraosseous, desmoplastic, unicystic); (4) eponyms are no longer used in the revised classification; (5) the AOT is reclassified as an epithelial OT; (6) a neoplastic and non-neoplastic line of the ameloblastic fibroma and ameloblastic fibrodentinoma is proposed; (7) the calcifying ghost cell odontogenic tumor is included in the classification; (8) the simple and the WHO type of odontogenic fibroma are included in the classification; (9) the classification of malignant OT is adapted from Eversole (1999) with a few changes. In particular, ameloblastic carcinoma is differentiated from malignant ( metastasizing) ameloblastoma; (10) the term carcinoma in intraosseous (peripheral) ameloblastoma is introduced. Also, the malignant epithelial odontogenic ghost cell tumor is termed calcifying ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma; (11) the clear cell odontogenic tumor is termed clear cell odontogenic carcinoma; (12) the so-called pseudocysts are termed "cavities" (aneurysmal bone cavity, simple bone cavity, lingual and buccal mandibular bone cavity, focal marrow-containing jaw cavity).

Revision of the 1992-edition of the WHO histological typing of odontogenic tumours. A suggestion

Classification of odontogenic tumours is an academic exercise that has developed over the last 150 years. It was not until 1971 when a 5-year collaborated effort, organized by the World Health Organization (WHO), resulted in the first consensus on taxonomy of odontogenic tumours. The appearance of this first authoritative guide to the classification of odontogenic tumours marked the start of an era of quite intensive interest for studying this particular field of oral pathology. An updated 2nd edition of the WHO classification was published in 1992.

Expression of bone morphogenetic protein in the course of osteoinduction by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2

To clarify the mechanism of osteoinduction by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2), we examined the time-course localization of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) immunostained by an anti-BMP-2 monoclonal antibody after implantation of pellets consisting of rhBMP-2 and collagen in rat calf muscle pouch. On day 3 after implantation, BMP was detected in the entire lump, and the intensity of staining for BMP around the implant on day 7 was weaker than that on day 3. The staining for BMP decreased with time and the region of staining for BMP remained more centralized in the implant. On day 10 after implantation, BMP was observed in part of the newly induced cartilage, especially around chondrocytes. On day 14 after implantation, BMP was localized in the newly induced woven bone. On day 21, BMP staining was found in osteoblasts at the surface of the newly induced bone. Especially, the staining for BMP decreased from day 10 to day 21. These results indicate that the woven bone was replaced with mature lamellar bone from day 14 to day 21. The present findings suggest that rhBMP-2 plays an important role in osteoinduction, especially at the early stage.

Neural cell adhesion molecule and neurothelin expression in human ameloblastoma

PURPOSE

The objective of the present study was to determine whether neural cell adhesion molecules (NCAM; CD56) and neurothelin (CD147) are expressed by adontogenic cells in the ameloblastoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Frozen sections from ameloblastoma specimens (n = 7) were stained with monoclonal antibody-recognizing CD56 and CD147 molecules using indirect immunoperoxidase and indirect immunofluorescent techniques.

RESULTS

CD56 and CD147 molecules were strongly expressed by the peripheral columnar cells of the tumor nests. Neurothelin reactivity was also present in the stellate reticulum of the nests and in some stromal components.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of these antigens in ameloblastoma supports the classic view about the neural crest origin of cells giving use to this tumor.

Aberrant gene expression in epithelial cells of mixed odontogenic tumors

Comparative investigations of odontogenic cells in normally forming teeth and tumors may provide insights into the mechanisms of the differentiation process. The present study is devoted to late phenotypic markers of ameloblast and odontoblast cells, i.e., proteins involved in biomineralization. The in situ expression of amelogenins, keratins, collagens type III and IV, vimentin, fibronectin, osteonectin, and osteocalcin was performed on normal and tumor odontogenic human cells. The pattern of protein expression showed some similarities between ameloblasts and odontoblasts present in normally developing human teeth and cells present in neoplastic tissues of ameloblastic fibroma, ameloblastic fibro-odontomas, and complex odontomas. Amelogenins (for ameloblasts) and osteocalcin (for odontoblasts) were detected in cells with well-organized enamel and dentin, respectively. In contrast, "mixed" cells located in epithelial zones of mixed odontogenic tumors co-expressed amelogenins and osteocalcin, as shown by immunostaining. The presence of osteocalcin transcripts was also demonstrated by in situ hybridization in these cells. Keratins and vimentin were detected in the same epithelial zones. Tumor epithelial cells were associated with various amounts of polymorphic matrix (amelogenin- and osteocalcin-immunoreactive), depending on the types of mixed tumors. No osteocalcin labeling was found in epithelial tumors. This study confirms that the differentiation of normal and tumor odontogenic cells is accompanied by the expression of some common molecules. Furthermore, the gene products present in normal mesenchymal cells were also shown in odontogenic tumor epithelium. These data may be related to a tumor-specific overexpression of the corresponding genes transcribed at an undetectable level during normal development and/or to an epithelial-mesenchymal transition proposed to occur during normal root formation. A plausible explanation for the results is that the odontogenic tumor epithelial cells are recapitulating genetic programs expressed during normal odontogenesis, but the tumor cells demonstrate abnormal expression patterns for these genes.