Prevalence and risk factors for diabetes mellitus in moderate term survivors of liver transplantation

Progress of new-onset diabetes after liver and kidney transplantation

Organ transplantation is currently the most effective treatment for end-stage organ failure. Post transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a severe complication after organ transplantation that seriously affects the short-term and long-term survival of recipients. However, PTDM is often overlooked or poorly managed in its early stage. This article provides an overview of the incidence, and pathogenesis of and risk factors for PTDM, aiming to gain a deeper understanding of PTDM and improve the quality of life of recipients.

New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus (NODM) After Liver Transplantation (LT): The Ultimate Non-diabetogenic Immunosuppressive Therapy

New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) is a common long-term complication after liver transplantation (LT). It is thought to be drug-induced in most cases, no matter the underlying disease that cause liver failure and indicated transplantation. Standard post-transplantation (PT) immunosuppressive regimens include prolonged use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), namely tacrolimus (TAC), alongside corticosteroids to avoid acute and chronic graft rejection. This combination is well known for its diabetogenicity. Significant differences between the applied regimens stand out concerning the duration and dosages to prevent the metabolic side effects of these drugs in the long run without compromising the graft's survival. Studies were collected after an extensive research of PubMed database for this very specific topic using the following MeSH keywords in multiple combinations: "Liver Transplantation," "Diabetes Mellitus," "NODM," "Tacrolimus," "Cyclosporine A," and "Steroids." In addition, we used the same keywords for regular searches in Google Scholar. Only the relevant English human studies between 2010 and 2020 were collected except for review articles. Duplicates were eliminated using Mendeley software. Twelve relevant studies directly related to the targeted topic were collected and discussed, including five retrospective cohorts, four prospective cohorts, one clinical trial, one prospective pilot, and one case report. Their topics included primarily the factors increasing the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus after liver transplantation (NODALT), TAC-based immunosuppression and its relative blood levels affecting the possible development of NODALT, the role of cyclosporine in substituting TAC regimen, and the effect of different steroids-avoiding protocols on the prevention of NODALT. The reviewed studies suggested that lowering the serum concentration of tacrolimus (cTAC) throughout the PT period and eliminating the corticosteroids regimen as early as possible, among other measures, can significantly impact the rate of emergence of NODM. This traditional review tackles the most recent studies about NODALT to establish a comprehensive view on this issue and guide clinicians and researchers for the safest immunosuppressive regimen to date, while maintaining a balanced metabolic profile.

NAFLD and liver transplantation: Disease burden, current management and future challenges

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), specifically its progressive form non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), represents the fastest growing indication for liver transplantation in Western countries. Diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity and cardiovascular disease are frequently present in patients with NAFLD who are candidates for liver transplantation. These factors require specific evaluation, including a detailed pre-surgical risk stratification, in order to improve outcomes after liver transplantation. Moreover, in the post-transplantation setting, the incidence of cardiovascular events and metabolic complications can be amplified by immunosuppressive therapy, which is a well-known driver of metabolic alterations. Indeed, patients with NASH are more prone to developing early post-transplant complications and, in the long-term, de novo malignancy and cardiovascular events, corresponding to higher mortality rates. Therefore, a tailored multidisciplinary approach is required for these patients, both before and after liver transplantation. Appropriate candidate selection, lifestyle modifications and specific assessment in the pre-transplant setting, as well as pharmacological strategies, adjustment of immunosuppression and a healthy lifestyle in the post-transplant setting, play a key role in correct management.

Body Weight Parameters are Related to Morbidity and Mortality After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Weight gain and obesity are well-known clinical issues in liver transplantation (LTx). However, their impacts on patient outcomes remain unclear, as only the impact of pre-LTx body mass index (BMI) on survival has been meta-analyzed. We summarized and synthesized the evidence on pre- and post-LTx body weight parameters' relations with post-LTx outcomes such as survival, metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities, and healthcare utilization.

METHODS

We followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions' recommendations. Quality was assessed via a 19-item instrument. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for outcomes investigated in ≥5 studies.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included 37 studies. Patients with pre-LTx BMI ≥ 30 kg/m and BMI ≥ 35 kg/m had lower overall survival rates than those with pre-LTx normal weight (72.6% and 69.8% versus 84.2%; P = 0.02 and P = 0.03, respectively). Those with pre-LTx BMI ≥ 30 kg/m had worse overall graft survival than normal weight patients (75.8% and 85.4%; P = 0.003). Pre-LTx BMI and pre-LTx overweight were associated with new-onset diabetes (P < 0.001 and P = 0.015, respectively), but post-LTx BMI showed no relationship. No associations were evident with healthcare utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with BMI values ≥30 kg/m had worse patient and graft survival than those with normal weight. Few of the reviewed studies examined post-LTx body weight parameters or other relevant outcomes such as cardiovascular comorbidities. High heterogeneity as well as diverse definitions and operationalizations of measurement and outcomes severely impeded comparability.

Medical management of metabolic and cardiovascular complications after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation represents the only curative option for patients with end-stage liver disease, fulminant hepatitis and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Even though major advances in transplantation in the last decades have achieved excellent survival rates in the early post-transplantation period, long-term survival is hampered by the lack of improvement in survival in the late post transplantation period (over 5 years after transplantation). The main etiologies for late mortality are malignancies and cardiovascular complications. The latter are increasingly prevalent in liver transplant recipients due to the development or worsening of metabolic syndrome and all its components (arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, renal injury, etc.). These comorbidities result from a combination of pre-liver transplant features, immunosuppressive agent side-effects, changes in metabolism and hemodynamics after liver transplantation and the adoption of a sedentary lifestyle. In this review we describe the most prevalent metabolic and cardiovascular complications present after liver transplantation, as well as proposing management strategies.

Clinical Profile of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Liver Transplantation: Results After a Multidisciplinary Team Intervention

BACKGROUND

Over the years, survival after liver transplantation has increased and metabolic complications are becoming more common, contributing to patients' morbidity and mortality. The objectives of this study were to describe a population of patients with hepatic transplantation and diabetes mellitus (DM), evaluate the frequency of metabolic complications, and assess the impact of a multidisciplinary team on DM management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study involving interview and medical record analysis of 46 consecutive patients followed at the diabetes mellitus and liver transplantation unit of a tertiary university hospital, all evaluated by a multidisciplinary team.

RESULTS

Of all patients, 76.1% were men, with a median age 60 years old (interquartile range: 56 to 65 years) and liver transplantation time of 5 years (interquartile range: 0.6-9 years). Hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, alcoholism, and smoking were present in 47.8%, 34.8%, 23.9%, 34.8%, and 30.4% of the patients, respectively. The most frequent immunosuppressant in use was tacrolimus (71.1%). Regarding nutritional status, 37.9% of patients were classified as overweight according to body mass index, and 41.2% were considered overweight according to the triceps skin fold. The median glycosylated hemoglobin and weight before and after intervention of the multidisciplinary team in all 46 patients were, respectively, 7.6% (5.7% to 8.8%) versus 6.5% (5.7% to 7.7%); P = .022 and 70.5 kg (64.7 to 82.0 kg) versus 71.6 kg (65.0 to 85.0 kg); P = .18.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertension and dyslipidemia were common in transplanted patients with DM. Intervention of the multidisciplinary team resulted in a significant improvement in glycosylated hemoglobin without significant weight gain.

Extrahepatic Manifestations of Hepatitis C Virus After Liver Transplantation

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a leading cause of chronic liver disease in the United States. Although the hepatic impact of chronic HCV leading to cirrhosis and the need for liver transplantation is paramount, the extrahepatic manifestations of chronic HCV infection are equally important. In particular, a better understanding of the prevalence and impact of extrahepatic manifestations of chronic HCV infection in the post-liver transplant setting relies on understanding the interplay between the effects of chronic HCV infection in a posttransplant environment characterized by strong immunosuppression and the associated risks of this milieu.

Glutathione S-Transferase Gene Polymorphisms and the Development of New-Onset Diabetes After Liver Transplant

OBJECTIVES

The association between the glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and the development of new-onset diabetes mellitus after liver transplant was studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Peripheral blood samples were collected from 106 liver transplant patients divided into 2 groups: 52 with new-onset diabetes mellitus and 54 without new-onset diabetes mellitus; 169 healthy individuals with no clinical evidence of diabetes mellitus were selected as a control group. The multiplex polymerase chain reaction technique was used for genotyping GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes, using the cytochrome P450, family 1, subfamily A, polypeptide 1 (CYP1A1) gene as an internal control. The genotype of GSTP1 was determined using the restriction fragment length polymorphism-polymerase chain reaction technique.

RESULTS

The frequency of both GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null genotypes was not significantly different in liver transplant patients with new-onset diabetes mellitus compared with the control group (P = .11 for GSTM1; P = .71 for GSTT1). Also, there was no statistically significant association between the frequency of the GSTP1 genotypes in the liver transplant patients with new-onset diabetes mellitus compared with controls. Neither GSTM1 nor GSTT1 null genotypes were associated with the risk of developing new-onset diabetes mellitus (P = .22 for GSTM1; P = .56 for GSTT1). However, the frequency of the heterozygous mutation (AG) in the A313G GSTP1 polymorphism in patients with new-onset diabetes mellitus was significantly higher than in patients without new-onset diabetes mellitus (55.8% vs 7.4%; P = .00). Thus, the risk of developing new-onset diabetes mellitus was significantly higher in patients presenting with heterozygous GSTP1 genotypes (odds ratio = 15.76; 95% confidence interval = 4.53-60.28; P = .00).

CONCLUSIONS

The GSTP1 AG genotype was associated with an increased susceptibility to the development of new-onset diabetes mellitus after liver transplant.

Prospective Analysis of Metabolic Parameters in the Detection of Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome in Liver Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Liver transplant recipients are at increased risk of metabolic complications, including new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) and post-transplant metabolic syndrome (PTMS), both of which are associated with decreased patient survival. We prospectively monitored traditional and novel metabolic parameters in nondiabetic liver transplantation (LT) candidates to determine their role in detecting these conditions.

METHODS

Nondiabetic adults undergoing initial LT were prospectively identified. NODAT and PTMS were defined according to WHO and ATP III criteria. Metabolic measures were collected at pre-LT, 4, and 12 months post-LT.

RESULTS

Of 49 subjects enrolled, 24.5% were found to be diabetic pre-LT by 2-hr oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) despite fasting glucose below the diabetic range. Two patients developed NODAT post-LT. A single patient was found to have MS at baseline, while PTMS developed in 26% and 31.3% of patients at 4 and 12 months. Novel metabolic markers did not detect these conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening OGTT detected pre-LT diabetes in patients with normal fasting glucose. Serial measurement of metabolic parameters allowed earlier detection of PTMS. Novel metabolic parameters did not correspond to post-LT outcomes, but provided a baseline for future study. More frequent and intensive metabolic monitoring appears reasonable, but larger studies are needed to clarify its efficacy.

New-onset diabetes after liver transplantation and its impact on complications and patient survival

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) in liver transplant recipients and the influence of NODAT on complications and long-term patient survival.

METHODS

We examined 438 patients who underwent liver transplantation between April 2001 and December 2008 and were not diabetic before transplantation.

RESULTS

The mean (± SD) follow-up duration was 2.46 ± 1.62 years. The incidence of NODAT 3, 6, 9, 12, 36, and 60 months after transplantation was 44.24%, 25.59%, 23.08%, 25.17%, 17.86%, and 18.18%, respectively. Multifactor analysis indicated that preoperative fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels and donor liver steatosis were independent risk factors for NODAT, whereas administration of an interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) antagonist reduced the risk of NODAT. Compared with the no NODAT group (N-NODAT), the NODAT group had a higher rate of sepsis and chronic renal insufficiency. Mean survival was significantly longer in the N-NODAT than NODAT group. Cox regression analysis showed that pre- and/or postoperative FPG levels, tumor recurrence or metastasis, and renal insufficiency after liver transplantation were independent risk factors of mortality. Pulmonary infection or multisystem failure were specific causes of death in the NODAT group, whereas patients in both groups died primarily from tumor relapse or metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative FPG levels and donor liver steatosis were independent risk factors for NODAT, whereas administration of an IL-2R antagonist reduced the risk of NODAT. Patients with NODAT had reduced survival and an increased incidence of sepsis and chronic renal insufficiency. Significant causes of death in the NODAT group were pulmonary infection and multisystem failure.

Risk factors for new onset diabetes mellitus after liver transplantation: A meta-analysis

AIM: To determine the risk factors for new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) after liver transplantation by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS: We electronically searched the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from January 1980 to December 2013 to identify relevant studies reporting risk factors for NODM after liver transplantation. Two authors independently assessed the trials for inclusion and extracted the data. Discrepancies were resolved in consultation with a third reviewer. All statistical analyses were performed with the RevMan5.0 software (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, United Kingdom). Pooled odds ratios (OR) or weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using either a fixed effects or a random effects model, based on the presence (I² < 50%) or absence (I² > 50%) of significant heterogeneity.

RESULTS: Twenty studies with 4580 patients were included in the meta-analysis, all of which were retrospective. The meta-analysis identified the following significant risk factors: hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (OR = 2.68; 95%CI: 1.92-3.72); a family history of diabetes (OR = 1.69, 95%CI: 1.09-2.63, P < 0.00001); male gender (OR = 1.53; 95%CI: 1.24-1.90; P < 0.0001); impaired fasting glucose (IFG; OR = 3.27; 95%CI: 1.84-5.81; P < 0.0001); a family history of diabetes (OR = 1.69; 95%CI: 1.09-2.63; P = 0.02); use of tacrolimus (OR = 1.34; 95%CI: 1.03-1.76; P = 0.03) and body mass index (BMI)(WMD = 1.19, 95%CI: 0.69-1.68, P < 0.00001). Other factors, such as hepatitis B virus infection and alcoholism, were not found to be associated with the incidence of NODM.

CONCLUSION: The study showed that HCV infection, IFG, a family history of diabetes, male gender, tacrolimus and BMI are risk factors for NODM after liver transplantation.

Effect of liver transplantation on glucose levels in patients with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) may induce the occurrence of diabetes mellitus. It can be speculated, however, that the LT may have a beneficial effect on glucose metabolism. We therefore conducted a study to examine the changing trends in blood glucose levels before and after LT in patients with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

In this observational study, we enrolled 47 patients (38 prediabetes and 9 diabetes) who underwent LT. We compared the blood glucose levels between the pre-transplantation (24 months) and the post-transplantation (36 months) periods and analyzed the diverse factors affecting glucose levels.

RESULTS

The glucose regulation worsened and insulin dose increased in patients with diabetes, which was notably seen during the steroid maintenance period. Following steroid withdrawal, however, there was a decrease in the insulin dose in 55.6% of the patients, and 33.3% of the patients converted from insulin to oral agents. Of the patients with prediabetes, 55.3% developed new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT). However, 18.4% achieved a recovery of glucose levels to normal range. Of the 21 NODAT patients, 52.4% achieved a recovery of glucose level to the prediabetes range after steroid withdrawal. There was a significant correlation between the old age and the persistence of NODAT (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

LT may have a diverse effect on glycemia, which may lead to changes in glucose control methods. Therefore, glucose metabolism after LT may need to be differentiated by the underlying glucose disturbance status and the time after LT with or without steroid maintenance period.

Immunosuppression: trends and tolerance?

Advances in pharmacologic immunosuppression are responsible for the excellent outcomes experienced by recipients of liver transplants. However, long-term follow-up of these patients reveals an increasing burden of morbidity and mortality that is attributable to these drugs. The authors summarize the agents used in contemporary liver transplantation immunosuppression protocols and discuss the emerging trend within the community to minimize or eliminate these agents from use. The authors present recently published data that may provide the foundation for immunosuppression minimization or tolerance induction in the future and review studies that have focused on the utility of biomarkers in guiding immunosuppression management.

Liver transplantation for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: New challenges and new opportunities

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is becoming rapidly one of the most common indications for orthotopic liver transplantation in the world. Development of graft steatosis is a significant problem during the post-transplant course, which may happen as a recurrence of pre-existing disease or de novo NAFLD. There are different risk factors that might play a role in development of graft steatosis including post-transplant metabolic syndrome, immune-suppressive medications, genetics and others. There are few studies that assessed the effects of NAFLD on graft and patient survival; most of them were limited by the duration of follow up or by the number of patients. With this review article we will try to shed light on post-liver transplantation NAFLD, significance of the disease, how it develops, risk factors, clinical course and treatment options.

New Onset Diabetes Mellitus in Living Donor versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplant Recipients: Analysis of the UNOS/OPTN Database

New onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) occurs less frequently in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients than in deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) recipients. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence and predictive factors for NODAT in LDLT versus DDLT recipients. The Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database was reviewed from 2004 to 2010, and 902 LDLT and 19,582 DDLT nondiabetic recipients were included. The overall incidence of NODAT was 12.2% at 1 year after liver transplantation. At 1, 3, and 5 years after transplant, the incidence of NODAT in LDLT recipients was 7.4, 2.1, and 2.6%, respectively, compared to 12.5, 3.4, and 1.9%, respectively, in DDLT recipients. LDLT recipients have a lower risk of NODAT compared to DDLT recipients (hazard ratio = 0.63 (0.52–0.75), P < 0.001). Predictors for NODAT in LDLT recipients were hepatitis C (HCV) and treated acute cellular rejection (ACR). Risk factors in DDLT recipients were recipient male gender, recipient age, body mass index, donor age, donor diabetes, HCV, and treated ACR. LDLT recipients have a lower incidence and fewer risk factors for NODAT compared to DDLT recipients. Early identification of risk factors will assist timely clinical interventions to prevent NODAT complications.

Incidence and risk factors for new-onset diabetes in living-donor liver transplant recipients

With the increased number of long-term survivors after liver transplantation, new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is becoming more significant in patient follow-up. However, the incidence of new-onset diabetes after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has not been well elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for NODAT in adult LDLT recipients at a single center in Japan. A retrospective study was performed on 161 adult patients without diabetes who had been followed up for ≥three months after LDLT. NODAT was defined according to the 2003 American Diabetes Association/World Health Organization guidelines. The recipient-, donor-, operation-, and immunosuppression-associated risk factors for NODAT were assessed. Overall, the incidence of NODAT was 13.7% (22/161) with a mean follow-up of 49.8 months. In a multivariate analysis, the identified risk factors for NODAT were donor liver-to-spleen (L-S) ratio (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.022, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.001-0.500, p = 0.017), and steroid pulse therapy for acute rejection (HR = 3.320, 95% CI = 1.365-8.075, p = 0.008). In conclusion, donor L-S ratio and steroid pulse therapy for acute rejection were independent predictors for NODAT in LDLT recipients. These findings can help in screening for NODAT and applying early interventions.

Cholesterol metabolism altered and FGF21 levels high after pediatric liver transplantation despite normal serum lipids

Liver transplantation (LT) predisposes to metabolic derangements and increases the risk for cardiovascular disease. We conducted a national cross-sectional study of all pediatric recipients who underwent LT between 1987 and 2007. We measured serum levels of noncholesterol sterols (surrogate markers of cholesterol synthesis and intestinal absorption) and fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) in 49 patients (74% of survivors) at a median of 10 years posttransplant and in 93 controls matched for age and gender. Although serum cholesterol levels were similar in patients and controls, patients displayed increased whole-body synthesis and decreased intestinal absorption of cholesterol compared with controls (lathosterol to cholesterol ratio 129 ± 55 vs. 96 ± 41, respectively, p < 0.001; campesterol to cholesterol ratio 233 ± 91 vs. 316 ± 107, respectively; p < 0.001). Azathioprine (r =-0.383, p = 0.007) and low-dose methylpredisolone (r =-0.492, p < 0.001) were negatively associated with lathosterol/sitosterol ratio reflecting a favorable effect on cholesterol metabolism. FGF21 levels were higher in patients than in controls (248 pg/mL vs. 77 pg/mL, p < 0.001). In healthy controls, FGF21 was associated with cholesterol metabolism, an association missing in LT recipients. Normal serum lipids are achievable in long-term survivors of pediatric LT, but changes in cholesterol metabolism and increased FGF21 levels may explicate later cardiovascular risk.

Long-term outcome after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a life-saving therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease, acute liver failure, and liver tumors. Over the past 4 decades, improvements in surgical techniques, peritransplant intensive care, and immunosuppressive regimens have resulted in significant improvements in short-term survival. Focus has now shifted to addressing long-term complications and improving quality of life in liver recipients. These include adverse effects of immunosuppression; recurrence of the primary liver disease; and management of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, renal dysfunction, osteoporosis, and de novo malignancy. Issues such as posttransplant depression, employment, sexual function, fertility, and pregnancy must not be overlooked, as they have a direct impact on the liver recipient's quality of life. This review summarizes the latest data in long-term outcome after liver transplantation.

Metabolic syndrome after liver transplantation: Preventable illness or common consequence?

The metabolic syndrome is common after liver transplant being present in approximately half of recipients. It has been associated with adverse outcomes such as progression of hepatitis C and major vascular events. As the United States population ages and the rate of obesity increases, prevention of the metabolic syndrome in the post-transplant population deserves special consideration. Currently, the metabolic syndrome after transplant appears at least two times more common than observed rates in the general population. Specific guidelines for patients after transplant does not exist, therefore prevention rests upon knowledge of risk factors and the presence of modifiable elements. The current article will focus on risk factors for the development of the metabolic syndrome after transplant, will highlight potentially modifiable factors and propose potential areas for intervention. As in the non-transplant population, behavioral choices might have a major role. Opportunities exist in this regard for health prevention studies incorporating lifestyle changes. Other factors such as the need for immunosuppression, and the changing characteristics of wait listed patients are not modifiable, but are important to know in order to identify persons at higher risk. Although immunosuppression after transplant is unavoidable, the contribution of different agents to the development of components of the metabolic syndrome is also discussed. Ultimately, an increased risk of the metabolic syndrome after transplant is likely unavoidable, however, there are many opportunities to reduce the prevalence.

Pretransplant fasting glucose predicts new-onset diabetes after liver transplantation

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is common after liver transplant and associated with poorer outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for NODAT in liver transplant recipients off corticosteroids. In 225 adult nondiabetic liver transplant recipients, the mean age was 51.7 years, the majority were men (71%), and half had HCV (49%). The mean calculated MELD score at transplantation was 18.7, and 19% underwent living-donor transplant (LDLT). One year after transplantation, 17% developed NODAT, and an additional 16% had impaired fasting glucose. The incidence of NODAT in patients with HCV was 26%. In multivariate analysis, HCV, pretransplant FPG, and LDLT were significant. Each 10 mg/dL increase in pretransplant FPG was associated with a twofold increase in future development of NODAT. The incidence of NODAT after liver transplant in patients off corticosteroids is 17%. Risk factors for developing NODAT include HCV and pretransplant FPG; LDLT is protective.

Long-term outcome of living donor liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), the majority of donors are genetically related to their recipients, leading to concerns of an earlier recurrence of PBC and a poorer prognosis due to genetic susceptibility. Totally 81 patients who underwent LDLT for PBC were the subjects of the present study. Immunosuppressive agents consisted of tacrolimus and methylprednisolone. In the outpatient clinic, when the aspartate and alanine aminotransferase level exceeded the upper limit of the normal range, the dose of methylprednisolone was increased from 4 to 6 mg/day for several months. Blood was examined every 2 weeks for 3 months and a liver biopsy was performed when aminotransferase levels did not decrease to the upper limit of the normal range after more than 3 months. Five-year survival and recurrence rates were estimated and the prognostic factors were analyzed. The mean observation period was 6.2 years. Five years after LDLT for PBC, the biopsy-proven PBC recurrence rate was 1%. The 5-year patient survival rate was 80%. The nonrelated or blood-related donor factor and number of human leukocyte antigen matches did not correlate with prognosis. PBC recurrence rate after LDLT in our series was lower than that in previous studies.

Metabolic syndrome in liver transplant recipients: prevalence, risk factors, and association with cardiovascular events

Features of metabolic syndrome are not uncommon in patients after liver transplantation. To examine the prevalence and risk factors of posttransplantation metabolic syndrome (PTMS), the files of 252 transplant recipients (mean age, 54.5 ± 2.8 years, 57.9% male) were reviewed for pretransplant and posttransplant clinical and laboratory parameters (mean follow-up, 6.2 ± 4.4 years). Rates of obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m(2) ), hypertriglyceridemia (>150 mg/dL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <40 mg/dL (men) or <50 mg/dL (women), hypertension, and diabetes were significantly higher after transplantation than before. Metabolic syndrome was diagnosed in 5.4% of patients before transplantation and 51.9% after. Besides significantly higher rates of the typical metabolic derangements (P < 0.0001), the patients with PTMS were older and heavier than those without PTMS, and they had a higher rate of pretransplant hepatitis C virus infection (P < 0.03) and more posttransplant major vascular and cardiac events (20 events in 15.2% of patients with PTMS versus 6 events in 4.9% of patients without PTMS; P < 0.007). There was no between-group difference in mortality or causes of death (mainly related to recurrent disease, graft failure, and sepsis). Significant independent predictors of PTMS on logistic regression analysis were age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.04), pretransplant nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (OR = 3.4), body mass index (OR = 1.13), diabetes (OR = 5.95), and triglycerides (OR = 1.01). The rate of metabolic syndrome in liver transplant recipients is more than twice that reported for the general population. PTMS is associated with cardiovascular morbidity but not mortality, and it may be predicted by pretransplantation conditions. Prospective studies are required to determine the significance and management of PTMS.

Hypomagnesemia and the risk of new-onset diabetes after liver transplantation

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a frequent complication after liver transplantation and has a negative impact on both patient and graft survival. In analogy with the previous finding of an association between posttransplant hypomagnesemia and NODAT in renal transplant recipients, the relation between both pretransplant and posttransplant hypomagnesemia and NODAT was studied in liver transplant recipients (LTRs). One hundred sixty-nine adult LTRs (>18 years old) without diabetes who underwent transplantation between 2004 and 2009 were studied (mean age = 52.11 ± 12.6 years, proportion of LTRs who were male = 67.5%, body mass index = 25.5 ± 4.4 kg/m², proportion receiving tacrolimus = 90.0%). NODAT was defined according to the American Diabetes Association criteria. The association of NODAT with both pretransplant and posttransplant serum magnesium (Mg) was examined. Overall, 52 of 169 patients (30.8%) developed NODAT, and 57.7% of these (30 patients) were treated with antidiabetic drugs. Both pretransplant Mg levels and Mg levels in the first month after transplantation were lower in patients developing NODAT (P = 0.008 and P = 0.001, respectively). A multivariate regression model (adjusted for weight, pretransplant glucose levels, hyperglycemia in the first week after transplantation, gender, hepatitis C, and corticosteroid dosing) demonstrated both pretransplant Mg levels (hazard ratio = 0.844 per 0.1 mg/dL increase, 95% confidence interval = 0.764-0.932, P = 0.001) and posttransplant Mg levels (hazard ratio = 0.659, 95% confidence interval = 0.518-0.838, P = 0.001) to be independent predictors of NODAT together with age, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in the first year after transplantation. In conclusion, pretransplant hypomagnesemia and early posttransplant hypomagnesemia are independent predictors of new-onset diabetes after liver transplantation. Other risk factors are age, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and CMV infection.

Cardiovascular risk factors following orthotopic liver transplantation: predisposing factors, incidence and management

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is the standard of care for acute and chronic causes of end-stage liver disease. Advances in medical therapy and surgical techniques have led to improvement of patient and graft survival rates following orthotopic liver transplantation. However, the prevalence of post-transplant cardiovascular complications has been rising with increased life expectancy after liver transplantation.

AIMS

To determine the incidences, risk factors, and treatment for hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes, and obesity in the post-liver transplantation population.

METHODS

We performed a review of relevant studies available on the PubMed database that provided information on the incidence, risk factors and treatment for cardiovascular complications that develop in the post-liver transplantation population.

RESULTS

Current immunosuppressive agents have improved patient and graft survival rates. However, long-term exposure to these agents has been associated with development of systemic and metabolic complications including hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus and obesity. Cardiovascular disease remains one of the most common causes of death in liver transplant patients with functional grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplant recipients have a higher risk of cardiovascular complications compared with the nontransplant population. Post-transplant cardiac risk stratification and aggressive treatment of cardiovascular complications, including modification of risk factors and tailoring of immunosuppressive regimen, is imperative to prevent serious complications.

Advanced glycation end products enhance monocyte activation during human mixed lymphocyte reaction

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a frequent complication among transplant recipients. Ligation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) with their receptor (RAGE) on monocytes/macrophages plays roles in the diabetes complications. The enhancement of adhesion molecule expression on monocytes/macrophages activates T-cells, leading to reduced allograft survival. We investigated the effect of four distinct AGE subtypes (AGE-2/AGE-3/AGE-4/AGE-5) on the expressions of intracellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, B7.1, B7.2 and CD40 on monocytes, the production of interferon (IFN)-gamma and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and the proliferation of T-cells during human mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR). AGE-2 and AGE-3 selectively induced the adhesion molecule expression, cytokine production and T-cell proliferation. The AGE-induced up-regulation of adhesion molecule expression was involved in the cytokine production and T-cell proliferation. AGE-2 and AGE-3 up-regulated the expression of RAGE on monocytes; therefore, the AGEs may activate monocytes, leading to the up-regulation of adhesion molecule expression, cytokine production and T-cell proliferation.

Long-term outcomes of liver transplantation: diabetes mellitus

1. Despite methodological problems in estimating the true incidence of new-onset diabetes (NODM), it is generally accepted that this is a common complication of liver transplantation (LT), with the mean reported incidence varying between 7% and 30%. 2. The main predictors of post-LT NODM are ethnicity, a family history of diabetes, age > 45 years, glucose intolerance prior to LT, central obesity, metabolic syndrome, use of corticosteroids over a long period, use of tacrolimus, and hepatitis C infection. 3. NODM is associated with impaired long-term graft function and reduced survival. Diabetes is among the main risk factors for coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral occlusive arterial disease in transplant recipients. 4. The management of NODM includes the therapeutic and preventive steps taken in patients with type 2 diabetes. Little information exists on the use of antidiabetic compounds in transplant recipients. Some studies have suggested that LT recipients with NODM may benefit from a conversion to cyclosporine through improved glucose metabolism.

Long-term management after liver transplantation: primary care physician versus hepatologist

As long-term survival after liver transplantation increases, metabolic complications are becoming increasingly prevalent. Given concerns about which group of providers should be managing liver recipients and how well metabolic complications are managed, we administered a postal survey to 280 transplant hepatologists to determine attitudes, perceptions, and practice patterns in the management of metabolic complications after transplantation. The response rate was 68.2%. There was great variation in patterns of practice across the United States with respect to the number of posttransplant clinics, clinic format, and number of recipients cared for per week. Hepatologists, primary care physicians (PCPs), and surgeons were primarily responsible for the overall care of liver recipients 1 year or more after liver transplantation according to 66%, 24%, and 8% of respondents, respectively. Hepatologists felt that metabolic complications were common, but few strongly agreed that hypertension (33.3%), chronic renal insufficiency (3.8%), diabetes mellitus (8.8%), dyslipidemia (11.1%), and bone disease (12.8%) were well controlled. The majority of hepatologists indicated that ideally PCPs should be managing recipients' hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and bone disease (78.8%, 63.1%, 78.3%, and 72.5%), but they felt that in actuality, PCPs were managing these conditions less frequently (45.4%, 51.4%, 44.6%, and 38%). In conclusion, metabolic complications are perceived to be common but not well controlled post-transplant, and most hepatologists feel that PCPs should take a more active role in the management of these complications. Future studies are needed to identify barriers to care in the treatment of metabolic complications post-transplant with the goal of improving long-term morbidity and mortality.

Diabetes mellitus after living donor liver transplantation: data from mainland China

Most reported data on posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) are from Western countries with patients who underwent deceased donor liver transplantation. A retrospective study was performed to assess the prevalence and predictive factors of PTDM in the context of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the Chinese population using the definition of PTDM proposed in 2003 by the World Health Organization and the American Diabetes Association. The prevalence of DM after LDLT in our study was 25% (21/84), and the incidence of PTDM was 14.9% (11/74) with 64% of cases diagnosed within 3 months after LDLT; 9.5% were observed to show impaired fasting glucose postoperatively. Multivariate analysis identified body mass index >or= 25 kg/m(2) before LDLT as the only independent risk factor for developing PTDM. Only one patient was operated for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related diseases were common in our study population, accounting for 78.6% of all patients. Both HCV and HBV infection status were not independent risk factors for developing PTDM. In addition, a greater tacrolimus trough blood level in the PTDM group versus no-DM group was observed at 3 months post-LDLT (11.03 ng/mL vs 4.87 ng/mL). The mean tacrolimus dose was not significantly different between the two groups. In conclusion, PTDM was prevalent among Chinese LDLT recipients.

Hepatitis C virus and type 2 diabetes

This review focuses on the relationship between hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and glucose metabolism derangements. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have shown that the chronic HCV infection is associated with an increased risk of developing insulin resistance (IR) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). The direct effect of HCV on the insulin signaling has been analyzed in experimental models. Although currently available data should be considered as preliminary, HCV seems to affect glucose metabolism via mechanisms that involve cellular pathways that have been implicated in the host innate immune response. IR and T2D not only accelerate the histological and clinical progression of chronic hepatitis C, but also reduce the early and sustained virological response to interferon-alpha-based therapy. Thus, a detailed knowledge of the mechanisms underlying the HCV-associated glucose metabolism derangements is warranted, in order to improve the clinical management of chronic hepatitis C patients.

New onset diabetes mellitus after liver transplantation and hepatitis C virus infection: meta-analysis of clinical studies

New onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) postliver transplantation (LT) is very common and may negatively affect patient and graft survival, but its causative mechanism is still unclear. This study was to analyze the connection between Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and NODM after LT by systematically reviewing published medical literature. We electronically searched databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from January 1980 to January 2008. Only retrospective studies could be identified. Seven of them were subjected to the meta-analysis. Analysis was performed by using revman 4.2 software. We found that HCV increased the prevalence of NODM [OR 2.46; 95%CI (1.44, 4.19)]. Then, we further analyzed the association between HCV and persistent-NODM (P-NODM) after LT. The result showed that prevalence of P-NODM was higher in HCV-positive group than in HCV-negative group with marginally statistical significance [OR = 1.39; 95%CI (1.06, 1.83)]. The present meta-analysis based on retrospective studies suggested a significant relationship between HCV and NODM after LT, and it seems that HCV infection might also increase the prevalence of P-NODM. Multicenter, large sized prospective studies are still needed to further confirm these results.

The significance of metabolic syndrome in the setting of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Although hyperinsulinemia and its associated metabolic syndrome (MS) have been implicated in the progression of hepatic fibrosis in hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients, little is known about the consequences of MS after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of this study was to assess the association between MS and fibrosis progression in patients with recurrent HCV after OLT. We identified all OLT/HCV patients (1998-2005) with at least 2 post-OLT liver biopsies. MS was defined with Adult Treatment Panel III criteria at 1 year post-OLT. The Ludwig-Batts scoring system was used to stage all biopsies (408 biopsies from 95 patients). The first biopsy that showed progression post-OLT was used for the time-to-progression analysis. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with fibrosis progression. MS was present in 50% of patients. Average follow-up to last available biopsy was 24 +/- 17 months, during which 72% of subjects had fibrosis progression. The overall median rate of fibrosis progression was 0.08 units per month (Q25, Q75: 0.0, 0.17). By univariable analysis, high HCV RNA at 4 months post-OLT (P < 0.001), diabetes (P = 0.046), cytomegalovirus infection (P = 0.006), and MS (P = 0.049) were associated with progression of fibrosis. In multivariable analysis, MS was independently associated with progression of fibrosis beyond 1 year after OLT (odds ratio = 6.3, P = 0.017). A high viral load at 4 months post-OLT (odds ratio = 1.1, P = 0.004) and steroid therapy for acute rejection (odds ratio = 1.9, P = 0.05) were independently associated with fibrosis progression. In conclusion, MS, a potentially modifiable disease, is common and is strongly associated with long-term fibrosis progression in the setting of recurrent HCV after OLT.

Predictive factors for posttransplant diabetes mellitus within one-year of liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The aims of our single-center study were to identify whether pretransplant diabetes had an impact on patient survival and, secondly, the predictive factors for development of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) (as defined by American Diabetes Association/World Health Organization).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred seventy-nine consecutive adult orthotopic liver-transplant patients were included in this study. Immunosuppression was based on calcineurin inhibitors with steroids, with or without mycophenolate mofetil, and with or without induction therapy. To evaluate the predictive factors for NODM, donor and recipient pre- and posttransplant data were included.

RESULTS

At transplantation, 38 patients had diabetes (group I), and the 141 nondiabetic patients constituted group II. In group I, paternal history of diabetes was more frequent (P=0.03), as was length of exposure to smoking (P=0.03), higher pretransplant glycemia (P<0.001), and shorter cold-ischemia (P=0.027) compared with group II. Pretransplant diabetes in group I resulted in a mortality rate of 39.5% at 1 year compared with 19.1% in group II (P=0.009). In group II, in multivariate analysis, independent predictive factors for NODM at M12 were pretransplant glycemia (P=0.037), alcohol-induced end-stage liver disease (P=0.04), and cumulative steroid dose within 1-year posttransplant (P=0.05).

CONCLUSION

Of the independent predictive risk factors for NODM, only steroid dose is modifiable, emphasizing the need for individualized immunosuppression.

Diabetes and Hepatic Oxidative Damage Are Associated With Hepatitis C Progression After Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is common after liver transplantation and was recently identified as a risk factor for hepatitis C progression. Increased levels of oxidative stress have been identified in diabetes and hepatitis C. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship among PTDM, oxidative damage in liver biopsy specimens, and fibrosis progression posttransplant.

METHODS

Subjects consisted of 27 hepatitis C-infected liver transplant recipients who had liver biopsy specimens available from 49 protocol liver biopsies. Paraffin embedded liver tissue sections were stained for 8-hydroxy-2' deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), an indicator of hydroxyl radical mediated tissue damage. The percentage of cells staining for 8-OHdG in a histologic section was categorized as high (>66%) versus low score (< or =66%). Fibrosis index was calculated as fibrosis score (0-4)/ years posttransplant. Time to bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis (F3-4) was compared as a function of PTDM and 8-OHdG score.

RESULTS

Considering all 49 biopsies, fibrosis index was higher in cases with PTDM (P<0.001) and high 8-OHdG score (P=0.004). High 8-OHdG score was associated with PTDM (P=0.012). In time to event analyses, time to F3-4 was more rapid in patients with PTDM (P=0.02) and in those with high 8-OHdG scores (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed a relationship between PTDM and hepatitis C fibrosis progression and found that oxidative damage in liver biopsy specimens was associated with PTDM and more rapid development of advanced fibrosis.

Long-term care of the liver transplant recipient

As survival increases after liver transplantation, common issues that arise involve immunosuppression-related complications and primary health care. Proper emphasis on the prevention and treatment of post-liver transplant complications, such as diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, renal dysfunction, osteoporosis, and obesity, requires careful screening and long-term surveillance to minimize the progression of these complications. Active involvement by internists and subspecialists is necessary and a multidisciplinary approach should be undertaken. Liver transplantation should be viewed as a lifelong commitment by both patient and physician.

Negative impact of new-onset diabetes mellitus on patient and graft survival after liver transplantation: Long-term follow up

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the long-term consequences of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) after liver transplantation (LTX).

METHODS

In a chart review between 1996 and 2004, we evaluated its incidence and possible effect on patient and graft survival. Inclusion criteria were: adult primary LTX; deceased donor LTX without combined organs; and dual immunosuppression with tacrolimus and corticosteroid. Patients who died within six months after LTX were excluded. For analytical purposes, each patient was classified into one of four groups: 1) preLTX diabetes mellitus (DM): established DM before LTX; 2) sustained NODM: NODM sustained > or =6 months; 3) transitory NODM: NODM temporarily existed > or =1 and <6 months; and 4) normal: no DM either pre- or postLTX. Patients who had NODM <1 month due to high-dose steroid (e.g., either immediate postLTX or rejection treatment) were considered as normal. Patient and graft survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

RESULTS

In all, 778 patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria: preLTX DM 159 (20.4%), sustained NODM 284 (36.5%), transitory NODM 108 (13.9%), and normal 227 (29.2%). Median follow-up was 57.2 months. There was a significant difference in patient (P = 0.012) and graft survival (P = 0.004) among the groups, with sustained NODM showing the poorest patient and graft survivals. Sustained NODM patients had a significantly higher rate of death due to infection, as well as graft failure due to chronic rejection and late onset hepatic artery thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

NODM is a frequent complication with poor patient and graft survival after LTX.