1
|
Punjala SR, Ibrahim M, Phillips BL, Stojanovic J, Kessaris N, Shaw O, Dorling A, Mamode N. Characteristics of Early Antibody Mediated Rejection in Antibody Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12942. [PMID: 39040870 PMCID: PMC11261346 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
Antibody incompatible transplantation (AIT) may be an only option for highly sensitized patients. Severe form of early antibody mediated rejection (AMR) adversely affects graft survival after AIT. The aim of this study was to identify individuals at risk of AMR. We analyzed 213 living donor AITs performed at our center. Among 120 ABOi, 58 HLAi and 35 DSA + FCXM-negative cases, the rates of early AMR were 6%, 31%, and 9%, respectively (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis for graft loss, early AMR had a HR of 3.28 (p < 0.001). The HLAi group had worse death-censored graft survival (p = 0.003). In the HLAi group, Patients with aggressive variant AMR (AAMR) had greater percentage of C3d complement fixing DSA, higher baseline class I and total DSA MFI levels and B-cell FCXM RMF. C1q and C3d complement fixing DSA and strong positivity of baseline B- or T-cell FXCM as predictors of AAMR had 100% sensitivity. Early AMR is of significant clinical concern in AIT as it results in poor graft survival and is not well described in literature. An aggressive variant is characterized by massive rise in DSA levels at rejection. Baseline DSA, C1q, and C3d and baseline FCXM values can be used to risk-stratify candidates for AIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sai Rithin Punjala
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Ibrahim
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Benedict Lyle Phillips
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jelena Stojanovic
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicos Kessaris
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, Evelina Children’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Olivia Shaw
- Clinical Transplantation Lab, Viapath, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony Dorling
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Inflammation Biology, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nizam Mamode
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, Evelina Children’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Favi E, Cresseri D, Perego M, Ikehata M, Iesari S, Campise MR, Morello W, Testa S, Sioli V, Mattinzoli D, Longhi E, Del Gobbo A, Castellano G, Ferraresso M. Sequential administration of anti-complement component C5 eculizumab and type-2 anti-CD20 obinutuzumab for the treatment of early antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: A proof of concept. Clin Immunol 2024; 264:110240. [PMID: 38734036 DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2024.110240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
Kidney transplant (KT) candidates with donor-specific antibodies (DSA) exhibit exceedingly high antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and allograft loss rates. Currently, treatment of ABMR remains an unmet clinical need. We report the use of the anti-C5 eculizumab and the type-2 anti-CD20 obinutuzumab in two patients with early ABMR. Eculizumab (900 mg IV) led to complete inhibition of the terminal complement cascade (unremarkable AP50 and CH50 activity) and prompt stoppage of complement-dependent antibody-mediated allograft injury (clearance of intra-graft C4d and C5b-9 deposition). Despite complement inhibition, obinutuzumab (1000 mg IV) determined full and long-lasting peripheral B-cell depletion, with significant reduction in all DSA. Graft function improved, remaining stable up to three years of follow-up. No signs of active ABMR and rebound DSA were detected. Obinutuzumab B-cell depletion and inhibition of DSA production were not affected by complement blockage. Further studies are needed to confirm the potential benefit of obinutuzumab in association with complement inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evaldo Favi
- General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.
| | - Donata Cresseri
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Perego
- General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Masami Ikehata
- Renal Research Laboratory, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Samuele Iesari
- General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Rosaria Campise
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - William Morello
- Pediatric Nephrology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Testa
- Pediatric Nephrology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Viviana Sioli
- Laboratorio di Immunologia dei Trapianti, Trapianti Lombardia - NITp, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Deborah Mattinzoli
- Renal Research Laboratory, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Longhi
- Laboratorio di Immunologia dei Trapianti, Trapianti Lombardia - NITp, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Del Gobbo
- Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Castellano
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Mariano Ferraresso
- General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Krishnan N, Briggs D. Imlifidase: Is it the Magic Wand in Renal Transplantation? Indian J Nephrol 2024; 34:291-296. [PMID: 39156835 PMCID: PMC11326793 DOI: 10.25259/ijn_325_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Potential kidney transplant patients with HLA-specific antibodies have reduced access to transplantation. Their harmful effects are mediated by the Fc portion of IgG, including activation of the complement system and Fc receptor-initiated cytotoxic processes by circulating leucocytes. Avoiding antibody incompatibility is the conventional approach, but for some patients this can mean extended waiting times, or even no chance of a transplant if there are no alternative, compatible donors. For these cases, pretransplant antibody removal may provide access to transplantation. Plasmapheresis is currently used to achieve this, with acceptable outcome results, but the process can take days to reduce the antibody levels to a safe level, so has limited use for deceased donors. There is now an alternative, in the form of an IgG-digesting enzyme, Imlifidase, which can be administered for in vivo IgG inactivation. Imlifidase cleaves human IgG, separating the antigen-binding part, F(ab')2 from Fc. Typically, within six hours of dosing, most, if not all, of the circulating IgG has been inactivated, allowing safe transplantation from a previously incompatible donor. For deceased donor transplantation, where minimizing cold ischaemia is critical, this six-hour delay before implantation should be manageable, with the compatibility testing processes adjusted to accommodate the treatment. This agent has been used successfully in phase 2 clinical trials, with good short to medium term outcomes. While a donation rate that matches demand may be one essential answer to providing universal access to kidney transplantation, this is currently unrealistic. IgG inactivation, using Imlifidase, is, however, a realistic and proven alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nithya Krishnan
- Department of Renal and Transplant Medicine, Institute of Cardiometabolic Medicine, University of Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom
- Institute of Community and Health Care, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - David Briggs
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Lab, NHS Blood and Transplant, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Coventry, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Doxiadis I, Loeffler-Wirth H, Lachmann N, Lehmann C. A Short History of B-Cell HLA Epitopes. Transfus Med Hemother 2024; 51:152-157. [PMID: 38867808 PMCID: PMC11166405 DOI: 10.1159/000538447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background HLA epitopes are currently in the focus of transplantation immunogenetics. The main reason is the complexity of the HLA system with >38,000 alleles, the number of which increases steadily. These alleles are determined by the current state-of-the art typing methods like second- and third-generation sequencing. Screening for HLA antibodies is hampered by the lack of specific target beads with all possible alleles described. Summary A way to circumvent the problem is to define HLA epitopes. The number of antibody-confirmed epitopes, on the other hand, was found to be 72 for HLA class I and 74 for HLA class II. Here, we elaborate on the current knowledge on these HLA epitopes. Absolute definitions of these structures are not yet available. Key Messages Making use of eplets is a comparable way allowing statistical analyses. However, one should keep in mind that the results obtained are approximative or perhaps better associative. Continuous collaboration is needed for the full understanding of the HLA epitopes. The reactivity toward epitopes remains patient-specific.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilias Doxiadis
- Laboratory for Transplantation Immunology, University Hospital Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Henry Loeffler-Wirth
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Bioinformatics, IZBI, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Nils Lachmann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, H and I Laboratory, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claudia Lehmann
- Laboratory for Transplantation Immunology, University Hospital Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Comins-Boo A, Irure-Ventura J, Valentin MO, Belmar-Vega L, López Del Moral Cuesta C, Valero San Cecilio R, Rodrigo Calabia E, Renuncio-García M, Castro Hernández C, Mikhalkovich D, Mota Pérez N, Ruiz San Millán JC, López-Hoyos M, San Segundo D. Low-risk delisting strategy in highly sensitized patients without donor offers included in exchange donation programs. One single-center experience. Hum Immunol 2024; 85:110806. [PMID: 38664156 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2024.110806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024]
Abstract
Donor exchange programs were designed to allocate organs for highly sensitized (HS) patients. The allocation algorithm differs slightly among countries and includes different strategies to improve access to transplants in HS patients. However, many HS patients with a calculated panel reactive of antibodies (cPRA) of 100 % remain on the waiting list for a long time. Some allocation algorithms assume immunological risk, including Imlifidase treatment, to increase the chance of transplantation in very HS patients. Here, we describe our unicenter experience of low-risk delisting strategy in 15 HS patients included in the Spanish donor exchange program without donor offers. After delisting, 7 out of 15 HS patients reduced the cPRA below 99.95 % and impacted the reduction of time on the waiting list (p = 0.01), where 5 out of 7 achieved transplantation. Within those HS that remained above 99.95 %, 1 out of 8 was transplanted. All the HS were transplanted with delisted DSA, and only one with DSA level rebounded early after transplantation. All HS transplanted after delisting maintain graft function. The transplant immunology laboratories are challenged to search intermediate risk assessment methods for delisting high HS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Comins-Boo
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Juan Irure-Ventura
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Maria O Valentin
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Lara Belmar-Vega
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Covadonga López Del Moral Cuesta
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Rosalía Valero San Cecilio
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Emilio Rodrigo Calabia
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Mónica Renuncio-García
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Carolina Castro Hernández
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Dzmitry Mikhalkovich
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Nerea Mota Pérez
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Ruiz San Millán
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Marcos López-Hoyos
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Molecular Biology Department, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - David San Segundo
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Han J, Rushakoff J, Moayedi Y, Henricksen E, Lee R, Luikart H, Shalakhti O, Gragert L, Benck L, Malinoski D, Kobashigawa J, Teuteberg J, Khush KK, Patel J, Kransdorf E. HLA sensitization is associated with an increased risk of primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2024; 43:387-393. [PMID: 37802261 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a leading cause of early morbidity and mortality following heart transplantation (HT). We sought to determine the association between pretransplant human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization, as measured using the calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) value, and the risk of PGD. METHODS Consecutive adult HT recipients (n = 596) from 1/2015 to 12/2019 at 2 US centers were included. Severity of PGD was based on the 2014 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus statement. For each recipient, unacceptable HLA antigens were obtained and locus-specific cPRA (cPRA-LS) and pre-HT donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were assessed. RESULTS Univariable logistic modeling showed that peak cPRA-LS for all loci and HLA-A was associated with increased severity of PGD as an ordinal variable (all loci: OR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, p = 0.025, HLA-A: OR 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03-1.26, p = 0.011). Multivariable analysis showed peak cPRA-LS for HLA-A, recipient beta-blocker use, total ischemic time, donor age, prior cardiac surgery, and United Network for Organ Sharing status 1 or 2 were associated with increased severity of PGD. The presence of DSA to HLA-B was associated with trend toward increased risk of mild-to-moderate PGD (OR 2.56, 95% CI: 0.99-6.63, p = 0.053), but DSA to other HLA loci was not associated with PGD. CONCLUSIONS Sensitization for all HLA loci, and specifically HLA-A, is associated with an increased severity of PGD. These factors should be included in pre-HT risk stratification to minimize the risk of PGD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiho Han
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Josh Rushakoff
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Yasbanoo Moayedi
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erik Henricksen
- Department of Transplant, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California
| | - Roy Lee
- Department of Transplant, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California
| | - Helen Luikart
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Omar Shalakhti
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Loren Gragert
- Department of Pathology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Lillian Benck
- Division of Cardiology, NorthShore University Health System, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Darren Malinoski
- Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Jon Kobashigawa
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jeffrey Teuteberg
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Kiran K Khush
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Jignesh Patel
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Evan Kransdorf
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu K, Stephens L, Nedelcu E, Bakhtary S. Differentiating patient characteristics between platelet refractory patients with and without antibodies to human leukocyte antigens. Transfusion 2024; 64:210-215. [PMID: 38168737 DOI: 10.1111/trf.17609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Predicting whether a patient's platelet refractoriness (PR) is due to immune or nonimmune causes can be challenging. This study compared the demographics and clinical history of PR patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (HLA-PR) versus PR patients without HLA antibodies. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of all patients with PR consults at a single institution over a 3-year period was performed. Patient charts were reviewed for all patients with confirmed PR, and demographic information (e.g., sex, race and ethnicity, preferred language) and clinical history (e.g., pregnancy, transfusion, primary diagnosis) were collected. Patient characteristics were compared among the HLA and non-HLA cohorts. RESULTS A total of 295 patients with confirmed PR were identified, of whom approximately 70% did not have HLA antibodies and 30% did. Approximately 84% of the HLA-PR cohort was female. A history of transfusions was not associated with HLA-PR (p = .1). A history of pregnancy was strongly associated with the occurrence of HLA-PR (p < .001). Splenomegaly was associated with PR in the absence of HLA alloimmunization whereas infection, fever, bleeding, and disseminated intravascular coagulation were not. CONCLUSION In this single-institution retrospective review, a history of pregnancy was strongly associated with HLA-PR, whereas a history of transfusion was not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey Liu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Laura Stephens
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Elena Nedelcu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sara Bakhtary
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lau KM, Chu PWK, Tang LWM, Chen BPY, Yeung NKM, Ip P, Lee P, Yap DYH, Kwok JSY. ABO-adjusted cPRA metric for kidney allocation in an Asian-predominant population. HLA 2024; 103:e15229. [PMID: 37728213 DOI: 10.1111/tan.15229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
Recent studies showed that ABO-adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (ABO-cPRA) may better reflect the histocompatibility level in a multi-ethnic population, but such data in Asians is not available. We developed an ABO-adjusted cPRA metric on a cohort of waitlist kidney transplant patients (n = 647, 99% Chinese) in Hong Kong, based on HLA alleles and ABO frequencies of local donors. The concordance between the web-based ABO-cPRA calculator and the impact on kidney allocation were evaluated. The blood group distribution for A, B, O and AB among waitlist kidney candidates were 26.2%, 27.5%, 40.1%, and 6.1%, and their chances of encountering incompatible blood group donors were 32.6%, 32.4%, 57.6%, and 0%, respectively. There is poor agreement between web-based ABO-cPRA calculator and our locally developed metrics. Over 90% of patients showed an increase in cPRA after ABO adjustment, most notably in those with cPRA between 70% and 79%. Blood group O patients had a much greater increase in cPRA scores after adjustment while patients of blood group A and B had similar increment. 10.6% of non-AB blood group waitlist patients had ABO-cPRA elevated to ≥80%. A local ABO-adjusted cPRA metric is required for Asian populations and may improve equity in kidney distribution for patients with disadvantageous blood groups. The result from the current study potentially helps other countries/localities in establishing their own unified ABO-cPRA metrics and predict the impact on kidney allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kei Man Lau
- Division of Transplantation & Immunogenetics, Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Patrick W K Chu
- Division of Transplantation & Immunogenetics, Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Lydia W M Tang
- Division of Transplantation & Immunogenetics, Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Bryan P Y Chen
- Division of Transplantation & Immunogenetics, Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Nicholas K M Yeung
- Information Technology and Health Informatics Division, Hospital Authority, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Patrick Ip
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children's Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Pamela Lee
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children's Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Desmond Y H Yap
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Janette S Y Kwok
- Division of Transplantation & Immunogenetics, Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lima BA, Reis F, Alves H, Henriques TS. Equity matrix for kidney transplant allocation. Transpl Immunol 2023; 81:101917. [PMID: 37567485 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Abstract
There is a general agreement that the distribution of kidneys for transplantation should balance utility criteria with justice. Moreover, a kidney allocation system must be based on transparent policies and seen as an ongoing process. This study aims to present an allocation system grounded on an equity matrix that balances the criteria of utility and justice. Synthetic data for a waiting list with 2000 transplant candidates and a pool of 280 donors were generated. A color priority system, the Eurotransplant (ET) kidney allocation system, and the proposed Equity Matrix (EQM) allocation system were compared after 1000 iterations of kidney allocations. Distributions of variables like the age difference, Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) mismatches (mmHLA), recipients' time on dialysis, cPRA, and a transplant score obtained by different allocation models were compared graphically and with Cohen's d effect size. For the analyzed variables, when we compare only the selected recipients from ET with the selected recipients from the EQM neutral model, we can conclude that the former model selects more hypersensitized recipients, a higher number of 65+ years' old recipients with 65+ years' old donors and higher number of recipients with 0 mmHLA. While recipients from EQM neutral are slightly older, have a lower age difference with their donors, have a lower number of mmHLA, are less likely to have 6 mmHLA with their donors, and have more time on dialysis. The proposed EQM model attempts to provide a simple, transparent, and equitable response to a complex question with results that outperform established practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno A Lima
- Oficina de Bioestatistica, Transplant Open Registry, Ermesinde, Portugal.
| | - Filipe Reis
- Oficina de Bioestatistica, Transplant Open Registry, Ermesinde, Portugal
| | - Helena Alves
- Oficina de Bioestatistica, Transplant Open Registry, Ermesinde, Portugal
| | - Teresa S Henriques
- Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences - MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal; Centre for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine University of Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Locke AF, Hickey M, Valenzuela NM, Butler C, Sosa R, Zheng Y, Gjertson D, Reed EF, Zhang Q. Virtual and Reality: An Analysis of the UCLA Virtual Crossmatch Exchanges. Transplantation 2023; 107:1776-1785. [PMID: 36944607 PMCID: PMC10358445 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
The "virtual" crossmatch (VXM) has become a critical tool to predict the compatibility between an organ donor and a potential recipient. Yet, nonstandardized laboratory practice can lead to variability in VXM interpretation. Therefore, UCLA's VXM Exchange survey was designed to understand factors that influence the variability of VXM prediction in the presence of HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA). Thirty-six donor blood samples and 72 HLA reference sera were sent to 35 participating laboratories to perform HLA antibody testing, flow crossmatch (FXM), and VXM from 2014 to 2019, consisting of 144 T/B-cell FXM pairs and 112 T/B-cell VXM pairs. In the FXM survey, 86% T-cell FXM and 84% B-cell FXM achieved >80% concordance among laboratories. In the VXM survey, 81% T-cell VXM and 80% VXM achieved >80% concordance. The concordance between FXM and VXM was 79% for T cell and 87% for B cell. The consensus between VXM and FXM was high with strong DSA. However, significant variability was observed in sera with (1) very high titer antibodies that exit prozone effect; (2) weak-to-moderate DSA, particularly in the presence of multiple weak DSAs; and (3) DSA against lowly expressed antigens. With the increasing use the VXM, standardization and continuous learning via exchange surveys will provide better understanding and quality controls for VXM to improve accuracy across all centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlene F. Locke
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Michelle Hickey
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Nicole M. Valenzuela
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Carrie Butler
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Rebecca Sosa
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ying Zheng
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - David Gjertson
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Elaine F. Reed
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Qiuheng Zhang
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nachiappa Ganesh R, Graviss EA, Nguyen DT, El-Zaatari Z, Gaber L, Barrios R, Truong L. Graft Microthrombus Formation in Postreperfusion Biopsies: Comprehensive Morphologic Characterization and Impact on Graft Outcome. Kidney Int Rep 2023; 8:1439-1444. [PMID: 37441477 PMCID: PMC10334391 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rajesh Nachiappa Ganesh
- Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Edward A. Graviss
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Duc T. Nguyen
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ziad El-Zaatari
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lillian Gaber
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Roberto Barrios
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Luan Truong
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alvares M, Anwar S, Hashmi SK, Zaman MB, Al Mahri A, Alvares C, Al Katheeri L, Purushothaman A, Ralonya ME, Sangalang MG, Jannang R, Abdulle A, Al Qubaisi A, Al Ahmed M, Khamis AH, Al Seiari M, Al Obaidli A, Al Yafei Z, ElGhazali G. Development of a calculated panel reactive antibody calculator for the United Arab Emirates: a proof of concept study. Sci Rep 2023; 13:8468. [PMID: 37231090 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34860-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Calculated panel reactive antibody (CPRA) is used to help increase sensitized patient's access to transplantation. United Arab Emirates (UAE) has a diverse resident population hence we developed a UAE-CPRA calculator based on HLA antigen frequencies of the different ethnic groups that represent the UAE population. HLA antigen frequencies at serological split antigen level for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1 of 1002 healthy unrelated donors were performed. We subsequently compared the performance of the UAE CPRA calculator with the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) and the Canadian CPRA calculators in 110 Kidney Transplant waitlist patients from January 2016 to December 2018. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient showed a moderate agreement between the UAE and OPTN calculator (Rc = 0.949, 95% CI 0.929-0.963) and the UAE and Canadian calculators (Rc = 0.952, 95% CI 0.932-0.965). While there continued to be a moderate agreement (Rc = 0.937, UAE versus OPTN calculator) in the lower sensitized group, a poor agreement (Rc = 0.555, UAE versus OPTN calculator) was observed in the higher sensitized group. In this study, we provide a template for countries to develop their own population-specific CPRA calculator. Implementation of the CPRA algorithm based on HLA frequencies of the multi-ethnic UAE population will be more fitting to increase access to transplantation and improve transplant outcomes. Our study demonstrates that the CPRA calculators developed using the data from the western population had poor correlation in our higher sensitized patients disadvantaging them in potential organ allocations systems. We plan to further refine this calculator by using high resolution HLA typing to address the problem of a genetically diverse population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Alvares
- Transplant Immunology section, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Union71 - Purehealth, Abu Dhabi and College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Siddiq Anwar
- Department of Medicine, Sheikh Shakbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Shahrukh K Hashmi
- Department of Medicine, Sheikh Shakbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Clinical Affairs, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Muhammad Badar Zaman
- Renal Transplant Department, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Ayeda Al Mahri
- Transplant Immunology section, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Union71 - Purehealth, Abu Dhabi and College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Layla Al Katheeri
- Transplant Immunology section, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Union71 - Purehealth, Abu Dhabi and College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Mesele Emily Ralonya
- Renal Transplant Department, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Marie Glo Sangalang
- Transplant Immunology section, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Union71 - Purehealth, Abu Dhabi and College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Raysha Jannang
- Transplant Immunology section, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Union71 - Purehealth, Abu Dhabi and College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Abdulkadir Abdulle
- Transplant Immunology section, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Union71 - Purehealth, Abu Dhabi and College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Alyazia Al Qubaisi
- Transplant Immunology section, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Union71 - Purehealth, Abu Dhabi and College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Maitha Al Ahmed
- Renal Transplant Department, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Amar Hassan Khamis
- Mohamed Bin Rashed University of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Mohamed Al Seiari
- Renal Transplant Department, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Zain Al Yafei
- Transplant Immunology section, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Union71 - Purehealth, Abu Dhabi and College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Gehad ElGhazali
- Transplant Immunology section, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Union71 - Purehealth, Abu Dhabi and College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
DeFilippis EM, Kransdorf EP, Jaiswal A, Zhang X, Patel J, Kobashigawa JA, Baran DA, Kittleson MM. Detection and management of HLA sensitization in candidates for adult heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2023; 42:409-422. [PMID: 36631340 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Heart transplantation (HT) remains the preferred therapy for patients with advanced heart failure. However, for sensitized HT candidates who have antibodies to human leukocyte antigens , finding a suitable donor can be challenging and can lead to adverse waitlist outcomes. In recent years, the number of sensitized patients awaiting HT has increased likely due to the use of durable and mechanical circulatory support as well as increasing number of candidates with underlying congenital heart disease. This State-of-the-Art review discusses the assessment of human leukocyte antigens antibodies, potential desensitization strategies including mechanisms of action and specific protocols, the approach to a potential donor including the use of complement-dependent cytotoxicity, flow cytometry, and virtual crossmatches, and peritransplant induction management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ersilia M DeFilippis
- Center for Advanced Cardiac Care, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Evan P Kransdorf
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Abhishek Jaiswal
- Hartford HealthCare Heart and Vascular Institute, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Xiaohai Zhang
- HLA and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jignesh Patel
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jon A Kobashigawa
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - David A Baran
- Cleveland Clinic, Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Weston, Florida
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rao RA, Kransdorf EP, Patel JK, Kobashigawa JA, Kittleson MM. How to Approach HLA Sensitization in Heart Transplant Candidates. JACC: HEART FAILURE 2023; 11:469-475. [PMID: 37019560 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
|
15
|
Attieh M, Dent EA, Happney L, Roback JD, Alter DN, Barrette E, Then C, Sullivan HC. Three patients highlighting potential pitfalls in platelet refractory testing. Transfusion 2023; 63:888-892. [PMID: 36794568 DOI: 10.1111/trf.17280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Platelet-transfusion refractory (PR) patients do not achieve expected post-transfusion platelet counts. We investigate suspected PR patients with post-transfusion platelet counts, indirect platelet antibody screens (ind-PAS), Class I HLA antibody tests (HLA-Scr), and physical platelet crossmatch (PXM) studies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS The three following cases describe possible pitfalls of laboratory tests used in PR workup and management. RESULTS Case #1: Antibody testing detected antibodies to only HLA-B13, corresponding to a 4% calculated panel reactive antibodies (CPRA; 96% predicted donor compatibility). However, PXM showed the patient compatible with 11/14 (79%) donors; two of the PXM-incompatible units were ABO-incompatible. Case #2: PXM revealed compatibility with 1/14 screened donors; however, the patient did not respond to the product from the compatible donor. The patient did respond to HLA-matched product. Dilution studies provided evidence of the prozone effect, which caused negative PXM despite clinically relevant antibodies. Case #3: There was a discrepancy between the ind-PAS and HLA-Scr. Ind-PAS was negative for HLA antibodies, while HLA-Scr was positive and specificity testing corresponded to 38% CPRA. Per the package insert, the sensitivity of ind-PAS is ~85% compared to HLA-Scr. DISCUSSION These cases highlight the importance of investigating incongruent results. Cases #1 and #2 demonstrate PXM pitfalls: ABO incompatibility can result in positive PXM and false-negative PXM can occur in the setting of the prozone effect. Case #3 reveals the importance of knowing a test's sensitivity. Centers that only perform ind-PAS may fail to detect HLA antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Attieh
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Edward A Dent
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - John D Roback
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - David N Alter
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Eileen Barrette
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Caroline Then
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - H Cliff Sullivan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Horwath M, Tvrdik T, Saxe D, Deeb KK, Roback JD, Gebel HM, Bray RA, Sullivan HC. Loss of heterozygosity leading to incorrect HLA typing for platelet-transfusion refractory patient. Transfusion 2023; 63:263-268. [PMID: 36426572 DOI: 10.1111/trf.17189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of platelet-transfusion refractory (PR) patients due to anti-HLA antibodies includes the provision of HLA-matched (HLAm) platelets (PLT) or PLTs that are negative for HLA antigens corresponding to the recipient antibodies. Obtaining HLAm PLTs is predicated on accurate HLA antigen typing of the recipient and donor. Here, we present the clinical implications of a case involving loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in a patient presented for PR workup. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS HLA typing was performed by three methods: (1) Real-time PCR; (2) Sequence-specific oligonucleotide (SSO) typing test; and (3) Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). Cytogenomic SNP microarray was utilized to assess LOH. RESULTS A 30-year-old female with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia was found to be PR secondary to HLA sensitization. A peripheral blood (PB) sample, containing 93% myeloid blast cells, was sent for HLA typing for the provision of HLAm PLTs. HLA typing revealed homozygosity at the HLA-A locus but was heterozygous at the -B and -C loci. After chemotherapy, HLA typing on a new PB sample, devoid of blast cells, identified HLA-A locus heterozygosity, which was subsequently confirmed by real-time PCR and NGS. Cytogenomic SNP microarray analysis demonstrated LOH of the HLA-A locus on chromosome 6p in the pretreatment sample but not in the posttreatment sample. CONCLUSION In hematologic patients with high tumor burden, HLA homozygosity should be viewed with suspicion for potential LOH. Therefore, HLA testing should be repeated, preferably with a non-hematological source (e.g., buccal swab) or following successful reduction of the tumor burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Horwath
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tatiana Tvrdik
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Debra Saxe
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kristin K Deeb
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - John D Roback
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Howard M Gebel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Robert A Bray
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Harold Clifford Sullivan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wu W, Zhang H, Tan J, Fu Q, Li J, Wu C, Huang H, Xu B, Ling L, Liu L, Su X, Wang C. Eplet-Predicted Antigens: An Attempt to Introduce Eplets into Unacceptable Antigen Determination and Calculated Panel-Reactive Antibody Calculation Facilitating Kidney Allocation. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12122983. [PMID: 36552990 PMCID: PMC9776513 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12122983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Calculated panel-reactive antibody (CPRA) is a measure of sensitization based on unacceptable antigens (UAs). Determination of UAs based on single-antigen bead assays at allele or antigen levels may be inappropriate. We aimed to introduce eplets for better assessment of sensitization; (2) 900 recipients and 1427 donors were enrolled for candidate or donor pools, respectively. Eplets were from the HLA Epitope Registry. UAs were determined by anti-HLA antibodies identified using LIFECODES Single Antigen (LSA) kits. CPRA values were calculated using a simplified method of donor filtering; (3) HLA antigens containing all eplets of an HLA antigen in LSA kits (LSA antigen) were defined as eplet-predicted (EP) antigens, the reactivity of which could be predicted by that LSA antigen. High reactivity concordance was found between LSA and EP antigens. More HLA antigens were covered by EP antigens in the population than LSA antigens. CPRA values at the EP level were higher than at the allele level and lower than at the antigen level. The EP antigens facilitated UA determination for non-LSA antigens and avoided acute rejection; (4) UA determination using EP antigens can lead to more accurate assessment of sensitization, enabling a high probability of compatible organs and a low risk of adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenrui Wu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Huanxi Zhang
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Jinghong Tan
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Qian Fu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Jun Li
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Chenglin Wu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Huiting Huang
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Bowen Xu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Liuting Ling
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Longshan Liu
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou 510080, China
- Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou 510080, China
- Correspondence: (L.L.); (X.S.)
| | - Xiaojun Su
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
- Correspondence: (L.L.); (X.S.)
| | - Changxi Wang
- Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou 510080, China
- Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou 510080, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bharadwaj P, Shrestha S, Pongracz T, Concetta C, Sharma S, Le Moine A, de Haan N, Murakami N, Riella LV, Holovska V, Wuhrer M, Marchant A, Ackerman ME. Afucosylation of HLA-specific IgG1 as a potential predictor of antibody pathogenicity in kidney transplantation. Cell Rep Med 2022; 3:100818. [PMID: 36384101 PMCID: PMC9729883 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is the leading cause of graft failure. While donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are associated with a higher risk of AMR, not all patients with DSAs develop rejection, suggesting that the characteristics of alloantibodies determining their pathogenicity remain undefined. Using human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-specific antibodies as a model, we apply systems serology tools to investigate qualitative features of immunoglobulin G (IgG) alloantibodies including Fc-glycosylation patterns and FcγR-binding properties. Levels of afucosylated anti-A2 antibodies are elevated in seropositive patients, especially those with AMR, suggesting potential cytotoxicity via FcγRIII-mediated mechanisms. Afucosylation of both glycoengineered monoclonal and naturally glycovariant polyclonal serum IgG specific to HLA-A2 drives potentiated binding to, slower dissociation from, and enhanced signaling through FcγRIII, a receptor widely expressed on innate effector cells, and greater cytotoxicity against HLA-A2+ cells mediated by natural killer (NK) cells. Collectively, these results suggest that afucosylated DSA may be a biomarker of AMR and contribute to pathogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pranay Bharadwaj
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
| | - Sweta Shrestha
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
| | - Tamas Pongracz
- Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Catalano Concetta
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi, Belgium; Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Hôpital Erasme, Université libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Shilpee Sharma
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - Alain Le Moine
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Hôpital Erasme, Université libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Noortje de Haan
- Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Naoka Murakami
- Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leonardo V Riella
- Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vanda Holovska
- HLA Laboratory, Laboratoire Hospitalier Universitaire de Bruxelles (LHUB), Hôpital Erasme ULB, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Manfred Wuhrer
- Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Arnaud Marchant
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - Margaret E Ackerman
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA; Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mohammadzadeh S, Jaladat AR, Mohammadi M, Geramizadeh B, Anbardar MH, Soleimani N, Amirinezhad Fard E, Tehrani NJ. Evaluation of the Iranian panel reactive antibody calculator and potential usefulness: A retrospective study. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14789. [PMID: 35933599 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES There are several cPRA websites based on large enough samples in Eurotransplant, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), and the Canadian Transplant Registry (CTR). On the other hand, those calculators can differ based on the ethnicity to which they are applied. We developed the Iranian PRA calculator and compared it with UNOS and CTR calculators. METHODS The allele and haplotype frequencies of the Iranian donor pool were estimated using the HLA typing of 523 deceased Iranian kidney donors. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network formula was used to generate cPRA (cPRA frequency). We also used a computer script to compare the undesirable antigens of patients with the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) phenotype of donors (cPRA filtering). A total of 100 anti-HLA antibody profiles were determined in 100 sensitized individuals on the waiting list, and cPRA was estimated using various PRA calculators. RESULTS Variable allelic frequencies were obtained from population heterogeneity in each calculator's donor panel. However, no significant changes in cPRA were identified between the Iranian calculator, UNOS, and the Canadian online calculators. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient of .98 showed that cPRA (freq) and cPRA (filter) values had almost perfect agreement. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION The cPRA values from the Iranian calculator are comparable to those from UNOS and CTR calculators. The donor filtering method was more useful because of factors like cost and flexibility. It also makes it easier to update cPRA on a regular basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahand Mohammadzadeh
- Shiraz Transplant Center, Abu-Ali Sina Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Abdul Reza Jaladat
- Shiraz Transplant Center, Abu-Ali Sina Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Maryam Mohammadi
- Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Bita Geramizadeh
- Shiraz Transplant Center, Abu-Ali Sina Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Hossein Anbardar
- Shiraz Transplant Center, Abu-Ali Sina Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Neda Soleimani
- Shiraz Transplant Center, Abu-Ali Sina Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Elahe Amirinezhad Fard
- Medical Biology Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Narges Jamshidian Tehrani
- Shiraz Transplant Center, Abu-Ali Sina Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Roa-Bautista A, López-Del-Moral C, González-López E, Gutiérrez-Larrañaga M, Renuncio-García M, Castro-Hernández C, Mikhalkovich-Mikhalkovich D, Comins-Boo A, Irure-Ventura J, Rodrigo E, Ruiz San Millán JC, López-Hoyos M, San Segundo D. Non-HLA Antibodies and Their Role in Highly Sensitized Patients. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:2439-2442. [PMID: 36319497 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of non-HLA antibody is gaining special attention in solid-organ transplantation and in highly sensitized (HS) patients because of its potential involvement in graft loss (GL) and/or antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). The identification of non-HLA antibodies while listed may provide deeper information about the increased immunologic risk prior to transplant. We aimed to identify non-HLA antibodies pretransplant that could involve GL in HS patients. METHODS Nineteen pretransplant samples from HS patients who underwent transplant at the Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital were studied for both HLA antibodies and a panel of 39 non-HLA antigens analyzed based on Luminex platform. RESULTS Eleven patient (57.9%) maintained the graft (KT group), whereas 8 (42.1%) had a GL within a median of 30 days. The median fluorescent intensity (MFI) of the 39 non-HLA antigens were compared within the groups, obtaining a statistically significant differences in protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type N (P < .04) with a MFI mean of 1408 vs 4931 for KT and GL groups, respectively. However, no significant differences were observed in non-HLA MFI between ABMR and non-ABMR KT recipients. CONCLUSIONS The presence of non-HLA antibodies in HS is high. The levels of anti-protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type N before transplant could indicate a potential risk of GL, although longitudinal studies with large number of cases are needed to define anti-non-HLA profiles of risk of ABMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriel Roa-Bautista
- Immunology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, 39008, Santander, Spain; Autoimmunity and Transplantation Research Group, Research Institute "Marqués de Valdecilla" (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | | | - Elena González-López
- Immunology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, 39008, Santander, Spain; Autoimmunity and Transplantation Research Group, Research Institute "Marqués de Valdecilla" (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - María Gutiérrez-Larrañaga
- Immunology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, 39008, Santander, Spain; Autoimmunity and Transplantation Research Group, Research Institute "Marqués de Valdecilla" (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Mónica Renuncio-García
- Immunology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, 39008, Santander, Spain; Autoimmunity and Transplantation Research Group, Research Institute "Marqués de Valdecilla" (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Carolina Castro-Hernández
- Immunology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, 39008, Santander, Spain; Autoimmunity and Transplantation Research Group, Research Institute "Marqués de Valdecilla" (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Dzmitry Mikhalkovich-Mikhalkovich
- Immunology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, 39008, Santander, Spain; Autoimmunity and Transplantation Research Group, Research Institute "Marqués de Valdecilla" (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Alejandra Comins-Boo
- Immunology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, 39008, Santander, Spain; Autoimmunity and Transplantation Research Group, Research Institute "Marqués de Valdecilla" (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Juan Irure-Ventura
- Immunology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, 39008, Santander, Spain; Autoimmunity and Transplantation Research Group, Research Institute "Marqués de Valdecilla" (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Emilio Rodrigo
- Nephrology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain
| | | | - Marcos López-Hoyos
- Immunology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, 39008, Santander, Spain; Autoimmunity and Transplantation Research Group, Research Institute "Marqués de Valdecilla" (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - David San Segundo
- Immunology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, 39008, Santander, Spain; Autoimmunity and Transplantation Research Group, Research Institute "Marqués de Valdecilla" (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Combining donor-derived cell-free DNA and donor specific antibody testing as non-invasive biomarkers for rejection in kidney transplantation. Sci Rep 2022; 12:15061. [PMID: 36064740 PMCID: PMC9445050 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19017-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) have lead to substantial progress in the non-invasive monitoring of the renal allograft by being able to detect or rule out subclinical rejection and guide immunosuppressive changes. In this study we sought to analyze the clinical, de novo DSA (dnDSA) and histological determinants of dd-cfDNA levels. The study included a cohort of stable renal function kidney transplant (KT) recipients who underwent anti-HLA dnDSA and dd-cfDNA testing between September 2017-December 2019. Statistical models were constructed to detect association with predictors of dd-cfDNA levels and other clinical characteristics. 171 renal allograft recipients were tested for dd-cfDNA and dnDSA at a median 1.06 years posttransplant (IQR: 0.37–4.63). Median dd-cfDNA was 0.25% (IQR: 0.19–0.51), 18.7% of patients having a dd-cfDNA ≥ 1%. In a multivariate linear regression model the presence of dnDSA MFI ≥ 2500 was the best independent determinant of dd-cfDNA level (p < 0.001). Among patients tested, 54 had concurrent dd-cfDNA determination at the time of an allograft biopsy. dd-cfDNA had an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.69–0.91; p < 0.001) and of 0.96 (95% CI 0.87–0.99) to discriminate any rejection and ABMR, respectively. After multivariate adjustment, the models that included ABMR (R = 0.82, R2 = 0.67, p < 0.001), or ptc (R = 0.79, R2 = 0.63, p < 0.001) showed the best correlation with dd-cfDNA level. We are confirming a strong association of dd-cfDNA with dnDSA and underlying alloimmune-mediated injury in renal allograft recipients in a cohort of patients with unsuspecting clinical characteristics for rejection and excellent allograft function. Our findings support the need for noninvasive biomarker surveillance in KT recipients and we propose that dd-cfDNA may complement dnDSA screening.
Collapse
|
22
|
Mamode N, Bestard O, Claas F, Furian L, Griffin S, Legendre C, Pengel L, Naesens M. European Guideline for the Management of Kidney Transplant Patients With HLA Antibodies: By the European Society for Organ Transplantation Working Group. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10511. [PMID: 36033645 PMCID: PMC9399356 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This guideline, from a European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) working group, concerns the management of kidney transplant patients with HLA antibodies. Sensitization should be defined using a virtual parameter such as calculated Reaction Frequency (cRF), which assesses HLA antibodies derived from the actual organ donor population. Highly sensitized patients should be prioritized in kidney allocation schemes and linking allocation schemes may increase opportunities. The use of the ENGAGE 5 ((Bestard et al., Transpl Int, 2021, 34: 1005–1018) system and online calculators for assessing risk is recommended. The Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch program should be extended. If strategies for finding a compatible kidney are very unlikely to yield a transplant, desensitization may be considered and should be performed with plasma exchange or immunoadsorption, supplemented with IViG and/or anti-CD20 antibody. Newer therapies, such as imlifidase, may offer alternatives. Few studies compare HLA incompatible transplantation with remaining on the waiting list, and comparisons of morbidity or quality of life do not exist. Kidney paired exchange programs (KEP) should be more widely used and should include unspecified and deceased donors, as well as compatible living donor pairs. The use of a KEP is preferred to desensitization, but highly sensitized patients should not be left on a KEP list indefinitely if the option of a direct incompatible transplant exists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nizam Mamode
- Department of Transplantation, Guys Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Nizam Mamode,
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Vall d’Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Frans Claas
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Immunology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lucrezia Furian
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical Gastroenterological and Oncological Sciences, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Siân Griffin
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Department of Nephrology and Adult Kidney Transplantation, Hôpital Necker and Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Liset Pengel
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Durgam SS, Alegre ML, Chong AS. Toward an understanding of allogeneic conflict in pregnancy and transplantation. J Exp Med 2022; 219:213135. [PMID: 35416935 PMCID: PMC9011201 DOI: 10.1084/jem.20211493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Pregnancy is recognized as a spontaneously acquired state of immunological tolerance by the mother to her semi-allogeneic fetus, but it is a major cause of allosensitization in candidates for organ transplantation. This sensitization, assessed by the presence of anti-HLA IgG, contributes to sex disparity in access to transplantation and increases the risk for rejection and graft loss. Understanding this dual tolerance/sensitization conundrum may lead to new strategies for equalizing access to transplantation among sexes and improving transplant outcomes in parous women. Here, we review the clinical evidence that pregnancy results in humoral sensitization and query whether T cell responses are sensitized. Furthermore, we summarize preclinical evidence on the effects of pregnancy on fetus-specific CD4+ conventional, regulatory, and CD8+ T cells, and humoral responses. We end with a discussion on the impact of the divergent effects that pregnancy has upon alloantigen re-encounter in the context of solid organ transplantation, and how these insights point to a therapeutic roadmap for controlling pregnancy-dependent allosensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samarth S Durgam
- Section of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Maria-Luisa Alegre
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Anita S Chong
- Section of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dani A, Heidel JS, Qiu T, Zhang Y, Ni Y, Hossain MM, Chin C, Morales DLS, Huang B, Zafar F. External validation and comparison of risk score models in pediatric heart transplants. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14204. [PMID: 34881481 PMCID: PMC9157612 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric heart transplant (PHT) patients have the highest waitlist mortality of solid organ transplants, yet more than 40% of viable hearts are unutilized. A tool for risk prediction could impact these outcomes. This study aimed to compare and validate the PHT risk score models (RSMs) in the literature. METHODS The literature was reviewed to identify RSMs published. The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry was used to validate the published models identified in a pediatric cohort (<18 years) transplanted between 2017 and 2019 and compared against the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) 2021 model. Primary outcome was post-transplant 1-year mortality. Odds ratios were obtained to evaluate the association between risk score groups and 1-year mortality. Area under the curve (AUC) was used to compare the RSM scores on their goodness-of-fit, using Delong's test. RESULTS Six recipient and one donor RSMs published between 2008 and 2021 were included in the analysis. The validation cohort included 1,003 PHT. Low-risk groups had a significantly better survival than high-risk groups as predicted by Choudhry (OR = 4.59, 95% CI [2.36-8.93]) and Fraser III (3.17 [1.43-7.05]) models. Choudhry's and SRTR models achieved the best overall performance (AUC = 0.69 and 0.68, respectively). When adjusted for CHD and ventricular assist device support, all models reported better predictability [AUC > 0.6]. Choudhry (AUC = 0.69) and SRTR (AUC = 0.71) remained the best predicting RSMs even after adjustment. CONCLUSION Although the RSMs by SRTR and Choudhry provided the best prediction for 1-year mortality, none demonstrated a strong (AUC ≥ 0.8) concordance statistic. All published studies lacked advanced analytical approaches and were derived from an inherently limited dataset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alia Dani
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Justin S. Heidel
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Tingting Qiu
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Yin Zhang
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Yizhao Ni
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Md Monir Hossain
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Clifford Chin
- Cardiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - David L. S. Morales
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Bin Huang
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Farhan Zafar
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cheung AY, Jeffrey JH, Kurji KH, Denny MR, Govil A, Holland EJ. Presence of Panel-reactive Antibodies after Penetrating Keratoplasty. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2022; 31:741-747. [PMID: 35404747 DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2022.2060263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the relationship between penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and postoperative PRA level and number of unacceptable antigens. METHODS A cross-sectionalstudy was performed on patients with history of PK. Patients with prior solid organ transplantation, pregnancy, or blood transfusion were excluded. These findings were combined with a retrospective review. Patients were grouped by single or multiple PKs. The primary outcome was postoperative PRA level. RESULTS Incidence of postoperative PRA elevation and mean peak PRA was higher in the multiple PK group (p = .08 and p = .010, respectively). Mean number of unacceptable antigens was elevated in the multiple PK group (p = .024). There was a moderately positive correlation between number of PK grafts and PRA level (r = 0.629, p = .0002). CONCLUSIONS PRA level may be influenced by PKs, with higher PRA associated with increased prior PKs. Further studies are necessary to determine the potential prognostic value.Abbreviations: PK: penetrating keratoplasty; PRA: panel reactive antibodies; OSST: ocular surface stem cell transplantation; LSCD: limbal stem cell deficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Y. Cheung
- Department of Ophthalmology, Virginia Eye Consultants/CVP Physicians, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
| | - Joseph H. Jeffrey
- Department of Ophthalmology, Cincinnati Eye Institute/CVP Physicians/University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Khaliq H. Kurji
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Matthew R. Denny
- Department of Ophthalmology, Cincinnati Eye Institute/CVP Physicians/University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Amit Govil
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Edward J. Holland
- Department of Ophthalmology, Cincinnati Eye Institute/CVP Physicians/University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
The role of sensitization in post-transplant outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease sensitization in adults with congenital heart disease. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcchd.2022.100384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
27
|
Principles of Virtual Crossmatch Testing for Kidney Transplantation. Kidney Int Rep 2022; 7:1179-1188. [PMID: 35685330 PMCID: PMC9171621 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) are the primary determinants of alloimmunity. A crossmatch test is a test that determines the immunologic risk of a recipient with a potential donor by ensuring that there are no transplant-relevant circulating antibodies in the recipient directed against donor antigens. Physical crossmatch (PXM) tests, such as complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) and flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM), require mixing of patient serum and donor cells, are labor intensive, and are logistically challenging. Virtual crossmatch (VXM) test assesses immunologic compatibility between recipient and potential donor by analyzing the results of 2 independently done physical laboratory tests—patient anti-HLA antibody and donor HLA typing. The goal of VXM is pretransplant risk stratification—though there is no consensus on whether such risk assessment involves predicting the PXM result or the posttransplant outcome. Although the concept of VXM is not new, the advent of solid-phase assays for detecting circulating antibodies in the recipient directed against individual HLA and DNA-based methods for typing donor HLA specificities at a higher resolution makes the routine use of VXM a reality. Accordingly, VXM may be applied at different scenarios—both for sensitized and nonsensitized patients. Implementation of VXM-based approach has resulted in statistically significant reduction in cold ischemia time without an increase in hyperacute rejection episodes. Though there are considerable challenges, VXM is expected to be used more often in the future, depending on the transplant center’s tolerance of immunologic risk.
Collapse
|
28
|
Evans RD, Lan JH, Kadatz M, Brar S, Chang DT, McMichael L, Gill J, Gill JS. Use and Outcomes of Induction Therapy in Well-Matched Kidney Transplant Recipients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:271-279. [PMID: 35131930 PMCID: PMC8823946 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.09170721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The optimal induction treatment in low-immune risk kidney transplant recipients is uncertain. We therefore investigated the use and outcomes of induction immunosuppression in a low-risk cohort of patients who were well matched with their donor at HLA-A, -B, -DR, -DQB1 on the basis of serologic typing. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Our study was an observational study of first adult kidney-only transplant recipients in the United States recorded by the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network. RESULTS Among 2976 recipients, 57% were treated with T cell-depleting antibodies, 28% were treated with an IL-2 receptor antagonist, and 15% were treated without induction. There was no difference in allograft survival, death-censored graft survival, or death with function between patients treated with an IL-2 receptor antagonist and no induction therapy. In multivariable models, patients treated with T cell-depleting therapy had a similar risk of graft loss from any cause, including death (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.98 to 1.45), compared with patients treated with an IL-2 receptor antagonist or no induction. The findings were consistent in subgroup analyses of Black recipients, patients grouped by calculated panel reactive antibody, and donor source. The incidence of acute rejection at 1 year was low (≤5%) and did not vary between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS Use of induction therapy with T cell-depleting therapy or IL-2 receptor antagonists in first kidney transplant recipients who are well matched with their donor at the HLA-A, -B, -DR, -DQB1 gene loci is not associated with improved post-transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhys D.R. Evans
- Division of Nephrology, Kidney Transplant Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - James H. Lan
- Division of Nephrology, Kidney Transplant Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Matthew Kadatz
- Division of Nephrology, Kidney Transplant Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sandeep Brar
- Division of Nephrology, Kidney Transplant Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Doris T. Chang
- Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lachlan McMichael
- Division of Nephrology, Kidney Transplant Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jagbir Gill
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,University of British Columbia School of Population and Public Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - John S. Gill
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,Department of Nephrology, Tufts–New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Das A, Taner T, Kim J, Emamaullee J. Crossmatch, Donor-specific Antibody Testing, and Immunosuppression in Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation: A Review. Transplantation 2021; 105:e285-e291. [PMID: 33606486 PMCID: PMC8364564 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Since the introduction of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) in the 1960s, the potential for immunological protection from the liver allograft to a simultaneously transplanted kidney has been recognized. Due to expanded indications and changes in allocation policies, there has been increased utilization of SLKT. Despite growing experience, a lack of consensus exists regarding the extent of the immunological privilege of the liver the role for donor-specific HLA antibody (DSA) and crossmatch testing, and appropriateness of modern immunosuppression protocols in SLKT recipients. This review provides a detailed analysis of SLKT outcomes in the context of these factors, suggesting that although the liver can reduce the incidence of antibody-mediated rejection, attention should be given to liver allograft function, previous failed transplants, and other risk factors in pretransplant risk assessment. Current methods of DSA and crossmatch testing in SLKT are also discussed, and the role of specific DSA (high mean fluorescence intensity antibody, C1q+ binding) and their potential importance in posttransplant risk assessment are examined. Finally, trends in SLKT immunosuppression are discussed, including the use of nondepleting agents for induction and de-escalating use of steroids for maintenance immunosuppression. Ongoing research, including multicenter or randomized trials, will be necessary to optimize immune-related outcomes in SLKT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anushka Das
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Timucin Taner
- Departments of Surgery and Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jim Kim
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Juliet Emamaullee
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Cozzi E, Schneeberger S, Bellini MI, Berglund E, Böhmig G, Fowler K, Hoogduijn M, Jochmans I, Marckmann G, Marson L, Neuberger J, Oberbauer R, Pierson RN, Reichart B, Scobie L, White C, Naesens M. Organ transplants of the future: planning for innovations including xenotransplantation. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2006-2018. [PMID: 34459040 DOI: 10.1111/tri.14031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The future clinical application of animal-to-human transplantation (xenotransplantation) is of importance to society as a whole. Favourable preclinical data relevant to cell, tissue and solid organ xenotransplants have been obtained from many animal models utilizing genetic engineering and protocols of pathogen-free husbandry. Findings have reached a tipping point, and xenotransplantation of solid organs is approaching clinical evaluation, the process of which now requires close deliberation. Such discussions include considering when there is sufficient evidence from preclinical animal studies to start first-in-human xenotransplantation trials. The present article is based on evidence and opinions formulated by members of the European Society for Organ Transplantation who are involved in the Transplantation Learning Journey project. The article includes a brief overview of preclinical concepts and biology of solid organ xenotransplantation, discusses the selection of candidates for first-in-human studies and considers requirements for study design and conduct. In addition, the paper emphasizes the need for a regulatory framework for xenotransplantation of solid organs and the essential requirement for input from public and patient stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Cozzi
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Transplant Immunology Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Maria Irene Bellini
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| | - Erik Berglund
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Division of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska Institute and ITB-MED, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Georg Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kevin Fowler
- The Voice of the Patient, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Martin Hoogduijn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ina Jochmans
- Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Georg Marckmann
- Institute of Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lorna Marson
- The Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Richard N Pierson
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bruno Reichart
- Walter Brendel Center for Experimental Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Linda Scobie
- Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rios P, Baidal D, Lemos J, Camhi SS, Infante M, Padilla N, Gil AMA, Fuenmayor V, Ambut J, Qasmi FA, Mantero AM, Cayetano SM, Ruiz P, Ricordi C, Alejandro R. Long-term Persistence of Allosensitization After Islet Allograft Failure. Transplantation 2021; 105:2490-2498. [PMID: 33481552 PMCID: PMC8289921 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allosensitization has been reported after discontinuation of immunosuppression following graft failure in islet transplantation (ITx) recipients, though duration of its persistence is unknown. METHODS We evaluated 35 patients with type 1 diabetes who received ITx, including 17 who developed graft failure (ITx alone, n = 13; ITx plus bone marrow-derived hematopoietic stem cells, n = 4) and 18 with persistent graft function. Panel-reactive antibody (PRA) was measured yearly for the duration of graft function within 1 y after graft failure at enrollment and yearly thereafter. RESULTS In ITx alone graft failure patients, 61% (8/13) were PRA-positive at 6 y postgraft failure, and 46% (6/13) developed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA to 2 ± 1 donors) during follow-up. The degree of sensitization was variable (cPRA ranging between 22% and 100% after graft failure). Allosensitization persisted for 7-15 y. Three subjects (3/13) were not allosensitized. In ITx plus bone marrow-derived hematopoietic stem cell recipients, cPRA-positivity (88%-98%) and DSA positivity persisted for 15 y in 75% (3/4) of subjects. CONCLUSIONS Allosensitization was minimal while subjects remained on immunosuppression, but after discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy, the majority of subjects (77%) became allosensitized with persistence of PRA positivity for up to 15 y. Persistence of allosensitization in this patient population is of clinical importance as it may result in longer transplant waiting list times for identification of a suitable donor in the case of requiring a subsequent transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Rios
- Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) and Clinical Cell Transplant Program, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - David Baidal
- Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) and Clinical Cell Transplant Program, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Joana Lemos
- Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) and Clinical Cell Transplant Program, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Stephanie S. Camhi
- Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) and Clinical Cell Transplant Program, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Marco Infante
- Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) and Clinical Cell Transplant Program, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Nathalia Padilla
- Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) and Clinical Cell Transplant Program, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Ana M. Alvarez Gil
- Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) and Clinical Cell Transplant Program, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Virginia Fuenmayor
- Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) and Clinical Cell Transplant Program, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Jonathan Ambut
- Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) and Clinical Cell Transplant Program, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Fatima A. Qasmi
- Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) and Clinical Cell Transplant Program, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Alejandro M. Mantero
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Shari Messinger Cayetano
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Phillip Ruiz
- Department of Surgery and Pathology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Camillo Ricordi
- Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) and Clinical Cell Transplant Program, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
- Division of Cellular Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Rodolfo Alejandro
- Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) and Clinical Cell Transplant Program, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Cruz-Beltran S, Lane A, Seth S, Miller K, Moore RH, Sullivan HC, Fasano RM, Guzzetta NA. Antibodies to human leukocyte antigens and their association with blood product exposures in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac transplantation. Paediatr Anaesth 2021; 31:1065-1073. [PMID: 34363427 DOI: 10.1111/pan.14269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Previous blood product exposures may result in the development of antibodies to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). Pediatric heart transplant recipients who have these antibodies experience increased morbidity and mortality after transplantation. In this study, our aims were to confirm the association of previous allogeneic blood product exposures with the formation of anti-HLA antibodies, determine which blood components pose the greatest risk of developing antibodies, and assess differences in outcomes after transplantation between patients who had anti-HLA antibodies and those who did not. METHODS This retrospective investigation included all children who underwent cardiac transplantation at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2018. Chart reviews were performed to collect pertinent data. Anti-HLA antibodies were detected by single antigen bead testing. Antibody burden was tabulated using the calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) score immediately prior to transplantation. Statistical analyses were conducted to examine differences based on HLA antibody status and identify associations with outcomes of interest. RESULTS Our results show a significant association between pretransplant blood product exposures and HLA antibody status. Children with a pretransplant blood product exposure had 7.98 times the odds of developing an anti-HLA antibody compared to those without a pretransplant blood product exposure (p = .01). We also found a significant association between a previous red blood cell (RBC) exposure and HLA antibody status (p = .01) which was not found for other blood component exposures. Patients who were HLA antibody positive were more likely to develop a donor-specific antibody (DSA) after transplantation (p = .04). CONCLUSIONS Exposure to previous allogeneic blood products affects the development of anti-HLA antibodies in children presenting for heart transplantation. Previous RBC exposures resulted in HLA antibody positivity more than other blood component exposures. Importantly, the presence of HLA antibodies was associated with the development of DSAs post-transplantation. Developing transfusion strategies to reduce allogeneic blood product exposures in children who may need future cardiac transplantation should be a high priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Cruz-Beltran
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Andrea Lane
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Shivani Seth
- Robert Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Kati Miller
- Department of Clinical Research, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Reneé H Moore
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Harold C Sullivan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ross M Fasano
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Nina A Guzzetta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Division of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Smeulders B, Pettersson W, Viana A, Andersson T, Bolotinha C, Chromy P, Gentile M, Hadaya K, Hemke A, Klimentova X, Kuypers D, Manlove D, Robb M, Slavcev A, Tubertini P, Valentin MO, van de Klundert J, Ferrari P. Data and optimisation requirements for Kidney Exchange Programs. Health Informatics J 2021; 27:14604582211009918. [PMID: 33878984 DOI: 10.1177/14604582211009918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Kidney Exchange Programs (KEP) are valuable tools to increase the options of living donor kidney transplantation for patients with end-stage kidney disease with an immunologically incompatible live donor. Maximising the benefits of a KEP requires an information system to manage data and to optimise transplants. The data input specifications of the systems that relate to key information on blood group and Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) types and HLA antibodies are crucial in order to maximise the number of identified matched pairs while minimising the risk of match failures due to unanticipated positive crossmatches. Based on a survey of eight national and one transnational kidney exchange program, we discuss data requirements for running a KEP. We note large variations in the data recorded by different KEPs, reflecting varying medical practices. Furthermore, we describe how the information system supports decision making throughout these kidney exchange programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ana Viana
- INESC TEC, Portugal.,Polytechnic of Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Aline Hemke
- Nederlandse Transplantatie Stichting (NTS), The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Antonij Slavcev
- Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Joris van de Klundert
- Prince Mohammad Bin Salman School of Business and Entrepreneurship, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.,Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paolo Ferrari
- Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Switzerland.,Università della Svizzera Italiana, Switzerland.,University of New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rossi AP, Alloway RR, Hildeman D, Woodle ES. Plasma cell biology: Foundations for targeted therapeutic development in transplantation. Immunol Rev 2021; 303:168-186. [PMID: 34254320 DOI: 10.1111/imr.13011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Solid organ transplantation is a life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage organ disease. Over the past 70 years, tremendous progress has been made in solid organ transplantation, particularly in T-cell-targeted immunosuppression and organ allocation systems. However, humoral alloimmune responses remain a major challenge to progress. Patients with preexisting antibodies to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) are at significant disadvantages in regard to receiving a well-matched organ, moreover, those who develop anti-HLA antibodies after transplantation face a significant foreshortening of renal allograft survival. Historical therapies to desensitize patients prior to transplantation or to treat posttransplant AMR have had limited effectiveness, likely because they do not significantly reduce antibody levels, as plasma cells, the source of antibody production, remain largely unaffected. Herein, we will discuss the significance of plasma cells in transplantation, aspects of their biology as potential therapeutic targets, clinical challenges in developing strategies to target plasma cells in transplantation, and lastly, novel approaches that have potential to advance the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy P Rossi
- Division of Immunobiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Immunology Graduate Program, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Rita R Alloway
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - David Hildeman
- Division of Immunobiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Immunology Graduate Program, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - E Steve Woodle
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Choi AY, Manook M, Olaso D, Ezekian B, Park J, Freischlag K, Jackson A, Knechtle S, Kwun J. Emerging New Approaches in Desensitization: Targeted Therapies for HLA Sensitization. Front Immunol 2021; 12:694763. [PMID: 34177960 PMCID: PMC8226120 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.694763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
There is an urgent need for therapeutic interventions for desensitization and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in sensitized patients with preformed or de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). The risk of AMR and allograft loss in sensitized patients is increased due to preformed DSA detected at time of transplant or the reactivation of HLA memory after transplantation, causing acute and chronic AMR. Alternatively, de novo DSA that develops post-transplant due to inadequate immunosuppression and again may lead to acute and chronic AMR or even allograft loss. Circulating antibody, the final product of the humoral immune response, has been the primary target of desensitization and AMR treatment. However, in many cases these protocols fail to achieve efficient removal of all DSA and long-term outcomes of patients with persistent DSA are far worse when compared to non-sensitized patients. We believe that targeting multiple components of humoral immunity will lead to improved outcomes for such patients. In this review, we will briefly discuss conventional desensitization methods targeting antibody or B cell removal and then present a mechanistically designed desensitization regimen targeting plasma cells and the humoral response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Stuart Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sypek MP, Kausman JY, Watson N, Wyburn K, Holt SG, Hughes P, Clayton PA. The Introduction of cPRA and Its Impact on Access to Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation for Highly Sensitized Patients in Australia. Transplantation 2021; 105:1317-1325. [PMID: 34019363 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In March 2016, Australia's deceased donor kidney allocation program introduced calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) based on antibody exclusions using multiplex assays to define sensitization for waitlisted candidates. We aimed to assess the impact of this change and review access to transplantation for highly sensitized patients under the current allocation rules. METHODS Registry data were used to reconstruct changes in panel reactive antibody (PRA)/cPRA for all patients active on the waiting list between 2013 and 2018. A multilevel, mixed-effects negative binomial regression model was used to determine the association between sensitization and transplantation rate in the cPRA era. RESULTS Following the introduction of cPRA, there was an increase in the percentage of the waiting list classified as highly sensitized (PRA/cPRA ≥80%) from 7.2% to 27.8% and very highly sensitized (PRA/cPRA ≥99%) from 2.7% to 15.3%. Any degree of sensitization was associated with a decreased rate of transplantation with a marked reduction for those with cPRA 95%-98% (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.36 [95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.47], P < 0.001) and cPRA ≥99% (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.09 [95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.12], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The proportion of the waiting list classified as highly sensitized increased substantially following the introduction of cPRA, and despite current prioritization, very highly sensitized patients have markedly reduced access to deceased donor transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew P Sypek
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Joshua Y Kausman
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Clinical Paediatrics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Narelle Watson
- Transplantation and Immunogenetics Services, Australian RedCross Lifeblood, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kate Wyburn
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stephen G Holt
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peter Hughes
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Philip A Clayton
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Central and Northern Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
The HLA System in Transfusion Medicine and Transplantation. Transfus Med 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/9781119599586.ch18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
38
|
KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation. Transplantation 2021; 104:S11-S103. [PMID: 32301874 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 273] [Impact Index Per Article: 91.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The 2020 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation is intended to assist health care professionals worldwide who evaluate and manage potential candidates for deceased or living donor kidney transplantation. This guideline addresses general candidacy issues such as access to transplantation, patient demographic and health status factors, and immunological and psychosocial assessment. The roles of various risk factors and comorbid conditions governing an individual's suitability for transplantation such as adherence, tobacco use, diabetes, obesity, perioperative issues, causes of kidney failure, infections, malignancy, pulmonary disease, cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, neurologic disease, gastrointestinal and liver disease, hematologic disease, and bone and mineral disorder are also addressed. This guideline provides recommendations for evaluation of individual aspects of a candidate's profile such that each risk factor and comorbidity are considered separately. The goal is to assist the clinical team to assimilate all data relevant to an individual, consider this within their local health context, and make an overall judgment on candidacy for transplantation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Guideline recommendations are primarily based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and our assessment of the quality of that evidence, and the strengths of recommendations are provided. Limitations of the evidence are discussed with differences from previous guidelines noted and suggestions for future research are also provided.
Collapse
|
39
|
Lan JH, Kadatz M, Chang DT, Gill J, Gebel HM, Gill JS. Pretransplant Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody in the Absence of Donor-Specific Antibody and Kidney Allograft Survival. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2021; 16:275-283. [PMID: 33495290 PMCID: PMC7863647 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.13640820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Panel reactive antibody informs the likelihood of finding an HLA-compatible donor for transplant candidates, but has historically been associated with acute rejection and allograft survival because testing methods could not exclude the presence of concomitant donor-specific antibodies. Despite new methods to exclude donor-specific antibodies, panel reactive antibody continues to be used to determine the choice of induction and maintenance immunosuppression. The study objective was to determine the clinical relevance of panel reactive antibody in the absence of donor-specific antibodies. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Retrospective observational study of kidney allograft survival among 4058 zero HLA-A-, B-, DR-, and DQB1-mismatched transplant recipients without antibodies to donor kidney antigens encoded by these HLA gene loci. RESULTS Among 4058 first and repeat transplant recipients, patients with calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) 1%-97% were not at higher risk of transplant failure, compared with patients with cPRA of 0% (death censored graft loss: hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.41). Patients with cPRA ≥98% had a higher risk of graft loss from any cause including death (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.79) and death censored allograft failure (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.27 to 2.49). In stratified analyses, the higher risk of graft loss among patients with cPRA ≥98% was only observed among repeat, but not first, transplant recipients. In subgroup analysis, there was no association between cPRA and graft loss among living related transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS Calculated panel reactive antibody is poorly associated with post-transplant immune reactivity to the allograft in the absence of donor-specific antibody. PODCAST This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2021_01_25_CJN13640820_final.mp3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James H. Lan
- Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada,Division of Nephrology, Kidney Transplant Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Matthew Kadatz
- Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada,Division of Nephrology, Kidney Transplant Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Jagbir Gill
- Division of Nephrology, Kidney Transplant Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada,Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada,Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Vancouver, Canada,School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - John S. Gill
- Division of Nephrology, Kidney Transplant Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada,Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada,Division of Nephrology, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Eplet-based virtual PRA increases transplant probability in highly-sensitized patients. Transpl Immunol 2021; 65:101362. [PMID: 33434652 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2021.101362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 01/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The reduced access of highly-sensitized (HS) patients to kidney transplantation (KTx) is one of the major challenges for transplant community. Therefore, the aim of our study was to estimate the impact of three different vPRA calculations, assessed traditionally and using eplet-based analysis, in donor offers. METHODS At 01-01-2020, 157 HS patients are waitlisted for deceased donor KTx and were included in this study. Total vPRA (vPRAt) was calculated considering all patient allosensitization history, using 1 k MFI cut-off. Current vPRA (vPRAc) refers only to the last year SAB assays, using 1 k MFI cut-off. For eplet vPRA (vPRAe) every SAB assay was analyzed by HLAMatchmaker and HLAfusion software. Matching runs have been performed taking vPRA calculation as unacceptable antigens (UAs). RESULTS All patients had at least one previous sensitizing event and patients with 100% vPRA were predominantly candidates for retransplantation (P < 0.001), had higher PRA-CDC (P < 0.001), and longer dialysis vintage waiting time (P < 0.001). Inter-group movement analysis between vPRA measures showed that 70 (45%), 124 (79%) and 80 (51%) patients were reclassified to a lower group when considering vPRAt to vPRAc, vPRAt to vPRAe and vPRAc to vPRAe, respectively. The median percentage of change in estimated number of match runs needed for 95% probability of finding an acceptable donor was significantly more pronounced by increasing vPRAt intervals, when considering the reclassification from vPRAt to vPRAe (P < 0.001) or vPRAc to vPRAe (P = 0.045), while from vPRAt to vPRAc it was not (P = 0.899). CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrated that the use of total or current vPRA calculations are impairing HS patients, by decreasing transplant probability, leading to dramatically longer waiting times, when compared to eplet based vPRA.
Collapse
|
41
|
Kransdorf EP, Pando MJ, Stewart D, Lindblad K, Bray R, Murphey C, Kaur N, Patel JK, Kim I, Zhang X, Maiers M, Kobashigawa JA, Gragert L. Stem cell donor HLA typing improves CPRA in kidney allocation. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:138-147. [PMID: 32558252 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Kidney Allocation System provides a priority to sensitized candidates based on the calculated panel reactive antibody (CPRA) value. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotype reference panel used for calculation of the CPRA by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), the OPTN contractor, has limitations. We derived a novel panel from the National Marrow Donor Program HLA haplotype data set and compared the accuracy of CPRA values generated with this panel (NMDP-CPRA) to those generated from the UNOS panel (UNOS-CPRA), using predicted and actual deceased donor kidney offers for a cohort of 24 282 candidates. The overall accuracy for kidney offers was similar using NMDP-CPRA and UNOS-CPRA. Accuracy was slightly higher for NMDP-CPRA than UNOS-CPRA for candidates in several highly sensitized CPRA categories, with deviations in linkage disequilibrium for Caucasians and the smaller size of the UNOS panel as contributing factors. HLA data derived from stem cell donors yields CPRA values that are comparable to those derived from deceased kidney donors while improving upon several problems with the current reference panel. Consideration should be given to using stem cell donors as the reference panel for calculation of CPRA to improve equity in kidney transplant allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan P Kransdorf
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marcelo J Pando
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Scott & White Medical Center, Temple, Texas, USA
| | - Darren Stewart
- Research Department, United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Kelsi Lindblad
- Research Department, United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Robert Bray
- HLA Laboratory, Emory University Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Cathi Murphey
- HLA Laboratory, Southwest Immunodiagnostics, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Navchetan Kaur
- Department of Pathology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Jignesh K Patel
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Irene Kim
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Xiaohai Zhang
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Martin Maiers
- National Marrow Donor Program, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jon A Kobashigawa
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Loren Gragert
- Department of Pathology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.,National Marrow Donor Program, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Aziz F, Tiwari A, Patel H, Chauhan R. Pretransplant histocompatibility testing algorithm: Laboratory and clinical approach in the Indian context. INDIAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION 2021. [DOI: 10.4103/ijot.ijot_82_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
43
|
Sullivan HC, Krummey SM, Gebel HM, Bray RA. The utility of second single antigen bead assay: Clearing the water or stirring up mud? Hum Immunol 2020; 81:663-670. [PMID: 33036787 PMCID: PMC8336427 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2020.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Though solid-phase single antigen bead (SAB) testing has provided major advances to the HLA community and organ allocation, it has not been without limitations. In particular, false-positive reactions lead to interpretative challenges and the potential to preclude a transplant if the corresponding antigens are deemed unacceptable. Two different vendor platforms are commercially available for SAB testing, one more recent than the other. The aim herein was to assess the benefit of using the newer SAB platform in situations where the primary platform yielded suspicious (specifically, false positive) reactions. Therefore, 42 serum samples with commonly encountered false-positive patterns observed in our laboratory were tested with the newer platform. Cases were classified as resolved, equivalent, or divergent based on whether the second platform produced no reactivity, the same pattern, or a distinctly different pattern compared to the primary platform, respectively. Approximately 33% of cases were resolved, 46% were equivalent, and 21% were divergent. The project revealed advantages of adding a second SAB platform to the laboratory's test menu including resolving challenging samples and including broader coverage of different alleles and unique class II alpha/beta subunit combinations. However, the challenges of validating, maintaining, and billing for another test method in the laboratory may be barriers to routine use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harold C Sullivan
- Emory University, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Scott M Krummey
- Emory University, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Howard M Gebel
- Emory University, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Robert A Bray
- Emory University, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Grazioli A, Athale J, Tanaka K, Madathil R, Rabin J, Kaczorowski D, Mazzeffi M. Perioperative Applications of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:3429-3443. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.01.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Revised: 01/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
45
|
Use of Panel-Reactive Antibody Testing in the Planning and Management of Ocular Surface Stem Cell Transplantation. Cornea 2020; 40:963-966. [PMID: 33009096 DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000002552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Panel-reactive antibody (PRA) testing has been widely adopted in solid organ transplantation for risk assessment in potential allograft recipients but has not been studied in the context of ophthalmic transplantation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes in patients undergoing ocular surface stem cell transplantation (OSST) for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) relative to preoperative PRA level. METHODS This is retrospective chart review of all eyes with documented PRA level that underwent OSST for LSCD between May 2000 and March 2019 at a single institution. Eyes with stable ocular surface but <1 year of follow-up and eyes without updated PRA before repeat OSST were excluded. Eyes were grouped by PRA <80% and ≥80%. The primary outcome was ocular surface failure, whereas the secondary outcome was clinical allograft rejection. RESULTS Sixty-nine surgeries met inclusion criteria, consisting of 54 living-related conjunctival limbal allografts, 5 keratolimbal allografts, and 10 combined living-related conjunctival limbal allografts/keratolimbal allografts (Cincinnati procedure). The most common etiologies for LSCD were aniridia (33%), chemical/thermal injury (28%), and contact lens associated (14%). Surface failure occurred in 5 of 12 eyes (58%) with PRA ≥80% versus 12 of 57 eyes (21%) with PRA <80% (P = 0.01). The relative risk for surface failure with PRA ≥80% was 2.8 [confidence interval (CI), 1.38-5.55]. There was no significant difference in acute rejection (P = 1). CONCLUSIONS Pretransplant PRA level is an important prognostic factor for ocular surface stability in eyes undergoing OSST for LSCD, with implications for donor selection, perioperative management, and systemic immunosuppression.
Collapse
|
46
|
Staeck A, Khadzhynov D, Kleinsteuber A, Lehner L, Duerr M, Budde K, Lachmann N, Halleck F, Staeck O. Influence of pretransplant class I and II non-donor-specific anti-HLA immunization on immunologic outcome and graft survival in kidney transplant recipients. Transpl Immunol 2020; 63:101333. [PMID: 32919027 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2020.101333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-HLA immunization determined by Panel Reactive Antibody (PRA) is known to have a negative impact on patient and graft survival. The predictive value of peak PRA (pPRA) on immunologic outcome, however, and the individual effects of anti-HLA class I and II antibodies remain uncertain. METHODS The influence of HLA immunization on immunologic outcome parameters and graft survival was investigated in 1150 adult patients without pretransplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and in a subgroup of elderly kidney recipients aged ≥ 65 (n = 264). Anti-HLA immunization was defined as a pPRA > 0%. We investigated the influence of class I and II pPRA by dividing all kidney recipients into four pPRA groups (0%, 1-20%, 21-80%, >80%). RESULTS Patients with non-donor-specific pretransplant anti-HLA immunization were at a higher risk for developing de novo DSA (49.9% vs. 18.7% p < 0.001), antibody mediated rejections (ABMR) (15.7% vs. 5.1%; p < 0.001), had a poorer death censored graft survival (69.2% vs. 86.2%; p < 0.001) and a higher decline of the calculated GFR. In elderly patients anti-HLA immunization only had a significant influence on the development of DSA (40.5% vs. 27.4%; p = 0.004). A multivariate model adjusted for all relevant factors revealed only class I but not class II pretransplant HLA immunization as a significant independent risk factor for de novo DSA, ABMR and death censored graft loss (HR 2.76, p < 0.001, HR 4.16, p < 0.001 and HR 2.07, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION Mainly non-donor-specific pretransplant HLA class I immunization is an independent risk factor for the development of de novo DSA, ABMR and graft loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Staeck
- Department of Nephrology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Dmytro Khadzhynov
- Department of Nephrology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anna Kleinsteuber
- Department of Nephrology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lukas Lehner
- Department of Nephrology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Duerr
- Department of Nephrology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nils Lachmann
- HLA Laboratory, Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Halleck
- Department of Nephrology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Staeck
- Department of Nephrology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Outcomes following kidney transplantation in patients with sickle cell disease: The impact of automated exchange blood transfusion. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0236998. [PMID: 32790687 PMCID: PMC7425908 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
There are over 12,000 people with sickle cell disease (SCD) in the UK, and 4-12% of patients who develop Sickle Cell Nephropathy (SCN) progress to End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). Renal transplantation offers the best outcomes for these patients with but their access to transplantation is often limited. Regular automated exchange blood transfusions (EBT) reduce the complications of SCD and may improve outcomes. However, concerns over alloimmunisation limit its widespread implementation. In this retrospective multicenter study, data were collected on 34 SCD patients who received a kidney transplant across 6 London Hospitals between 1997 and 2017. 20/34 patients were on an EBT program, pre or post renal transplantation. Overall patient and graft survival were inferior to contemporaneous UK data in the ESRD population as a whole, a finding which is well-recognised. However, patient survival (CI 95%, p = 0.0032), graft survival and graft function were superior at all time-points in those who received EBT versus those who did not. 4/20 patients (20%) on EBT developed de novo donor specific antibodies (DSAs). 3/14 patients (21%) not on EBT developed de novo DSAs. The incidence of rejection in those on EBT was 5/18 (28%), as compared with 7/13 (54%) not on EBT. In conclusion, our data, while limited by an inevitably small sample size and differences in the date of transplantation, do suggest that long-term automated EBT post renal transplant is effective and safe, with improvement in graft and patient outcomes and no increase in antibody formation or graft rejection.
Collapse
|
48
|
Rump K, Rahmel T, Rustige AM, Unterberg M, Nowak H, Koos B, Schenker P, Viebahn R, Adamzik M, Bergmann L. The Aquaporin3 Promoter Polymorphism -1431 A/G is Associated with Acute Graft Rejection and Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Recipients Due to Altered Immune Cell Migration. Cells 2020; 9:cells9061421. [PMID: 32521638 PMCID: PMC7349827 DOI: 10.3390/cells9061421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Major complications after kidney transplantation are graft rejection and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, which are related to T-cell function, which depends on aquaporin 3 (AQP3) expression. The impact of the AQP3 A(−1431)G promoter polymorphism in kidney transplant recipients was unelucidated and we explored the effect of AQP3 polymorphism on immune cell function and its association with graft rejection and CMV infection in 237 adult patients within 12 months after transplantation. AQP3 promoter polymorphism was molecular and functional characterized. Kaplan–Meier plots evaluated the relationship between genotypes and the incidence of CMV infection and graft rejection. AQP3 A(−1431)G A-allele was associated with enhanced immune cell migration and AQP3 expression in T-cells. The incidences of rejection were 45.4% for the A-allele and 27.1% for G-allele carriers (p = 0.005) and the A-allele was a strong risk factor (hazard ratio (HR): 1.95; 95% CI: 1.216 to 3.127; p = 0.006). The incidences for CMV infection were 21% for A-allele and 35% for G-allele carriers (p = 0.013) and G-allele was an independent risk factor (p = 0.023), with a doubled risk for CMV infection (HR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.154 to 3.128; p = 0.012). Hence, A-allele confers more resistance against CMV infection, but susceptibility to graft rejection mediated by T-cells. Thus, AQP3-genotype adapted management of immunosuppression and antiviral prophylaxis after kidney transplantation seems prudent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Rump
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr Universität Bochum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany; (T.R.); (A.-M.R.); (M.U.); (H.N.); (B.K.); (M.A.); (L.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-23432-29242; Fax: +49-234299-3009
| | - Tim Rahmel
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr Universität Bochum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany; (T.R.); (A.-M.R.); (M.U.); (H.N.); (B.K.); (M.A.); (L.B.)
| | - Anna-Maria Rustige
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr Universität Bochum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany; (T.R.); (A.-M.R.); (M.U.); (H.N.); (B.K.); (M.A.); (L.B.)
| | - Matthias Unterberg
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr Universität Bochum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany; (T.R.); (A.-M.R.); (M.U.); (H.N.); (B.K.); (M.A.); (L.B.)
| | - Hartmuth Nowak
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr Universität Bochum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany; (T.R.); (A.-M.R.); (M.U.); (H.N.); (B.K.); (M.A.); (L.B.)
| | - Björn Koos
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr Universität Bochum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany; (T.R.); (A.-M.R.); (M.U.); (H.N.); (B.K.); (M.A.); (L.B.)
| | - Peter Schenker
- Chirurgische Universitätsklinik, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, 44892 Bochum, Germany; (P.S.); (R.V.)
| | - Richard Viebahn
- Chirurgische Universitätsklinik, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, 44892 Bochum, Germany; (P.S.); (R.V.)
| | - Michael Adamzik
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr Universität Bochum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany; (T.R.); (A.-M.R.); (M.U.); (H.N.); (B.K.); (M.A.); (L.B.)
| | - Lars Bergmann
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr Universität Bochum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany; (T.R.); (A.-M.R.); (M.U.); (H.N.); (B.K.); (M.A.); (L.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Messner F, Etra JW, Yu Y, Massie AB, Jackson KR, Brandacher G, Schneeberger S, Margreiter C, Segev DL. Outcomes of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation based on donor resuscitation. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:1720-1728. [PMID: 32026618 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Revised: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
It has been hypothesized that transplanting simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) grafts from donors with a history of cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CACPR) leads to inferior posttransplant outcomes due to organ hypoperfusion during cardiac arrest and mechanical trauma during resuscitation. Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we identified 13 095 SPK transplants from 2000-2018, of which 810 (6.2%) were from donors with a history of CACPR. After inverse probability of treatment weighting on donor and recipient characteristics, we found that 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient (CACPR: 96.4%, 89.9%, and 78.9%; non-CACPR: 96.3%, 88.9%, and 76.0%; P = .3), death-censored pancreas graft survival (CACPR: 89.3%, 82.7%, 75.0%; non-CACPR: 89.9%, 82.7%, 76.3%; P = .7), and death-censored kidney graft survival (CACPR: 97.0%, 89.5%, 78.2%; non-CACPR: 96.9.9%, 88.7%, 80.0%; P = .4) were comparable between the two groups. There were no differences in the risk of pancreatitis (CACPR: 2.9%, non-CACPR: 2.4%; weighted OR = 0.74 1.22 2.02 ; P = .4), anastomotic leak (CACPR: 1.6%, non-CACPR: 2.0%; weighted OR = 0.54 1.02 1.93 ; P > .9), or median length of hospital stay (CACPR: 8 days, non-CACPR: 9 days; P = .6) for recipients of CACPR vs non-CACPR donors. Our findings suggest that CACPR donors could be used to expand the SPK donor pool without compromising short- or long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franka Messner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Joanna W Etra
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Yifan Yu
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Allan B Massie
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kyle R Jackson
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Gerald Brandacher
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christian Margreiter
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Thammanichanond D, Sukhumvat S, Tammakorn C, Siriyotha S, Kantachuvesiri S. Comparison Between Phenotypic Bead Assay and Single Antigen Bead Assay for Determining Specificity of HLA Antibodies in Kidney Transplant Waiting List. Transplant Proc 2020; 52:1675-1679. [PMID: 32448666 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.01.153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The determination of unacceptable antigens in patients on kidney transplant waiting list is a critical laboratory investigation in sensitized patients. The Luminex single antigen bead (SAB) assay has high sensitivity and accuracy. However, several countries have not yet implemented SAB testing for waitlisted patients because of limited financial resources. In Thailand, specificities of HLA antibodies are identified by using a phenotypic bead assay. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the phenotypic bead assay for determining HLA antibody specificities when compared with the SAB assay. METHODS A total of 254 sera from patients awaiting kidney transplantation were included. Of 254 sera, 206 and 171 were positive for HLA class I and II antibodies, respectively. Antibody specificities of sera that were tested with both phenotypic and SAB assay were analyzed. The performances of the phenotypic bead assay were compared with those of the SAB assay as the gold standard by using estimation of pooling sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. RESULTS The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the phenotypic bead assay for determining HLA class I antibodies was 53.9%, 93.0%, and 78.1%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the phenotypic bead assay for determining HLA class II antibodies were 57.3%, 94.9%, and 81.4% respectively. CONCLUSION In waitlisted kidney transplant patients, the phenotypic bead assay had high specificity and moderate accuracy when compared with the SAB assay. However, the low sensitivity of the test suggests that the use of the phenotypic assay for determining HLA specificities should be applied with caution in sensitized patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duangtawan Thammanichanond
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Sireewan Sukhumvat
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chutima Tammakorn
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sukanya Siriyotha
- Section for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Surasak Kantachuvesiri
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|