1
|
Singh N, Lentine KL, Fleetwood VA, Woodside KJ, Odorico J, Axelrod D, Alhamad T, Maher K, Xiao H, Fridell J, Kukla A, Pavlakis M, Shokouh-Amiri HM, Zibari G, Cooper M, Parsons RF. Indications, Techniques, and Barriers for Pancreas Transplant Biopsy: A Consensus Perspective From a Survey of US Centers. Transplantation 2024; 108:e129-e138. [PMID: 38467588 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreas transplant biopsy practices for the diagnosis of rejection or other pathologies are not well described. METHODS We conducted a survey of staff at US pancreas transplant programs (March 22, 2022, to August 22, 2022) to assess current program practices and perceptions about the utility and challenges in the performance and interpretation of pancreas allograft biopsies. RESULTS Respondents represented 65% (76/117) of active adult pancreas transplant programs, capturing 66% of recent pancreas transplant volume in the United States. Participants were most often nephrologists (52%), followed by surgeons (46%), and other staff (4%). Pancreas allograft biopsies were performed mostly by interventional radiologists (74%), followed by surgeons (11%), nephrologists (8%), and gastroenterologists (1%). Limitations in the radiologist's or biopsy performer's comfort level or expertise to safely perform a biopsy, or to obtain sufficient/adequate samples were the two most common challenges with pancreas transplant biopsies. Pancreas transplant biopsies were read by local pathologists at a majority (86%) of centers. Challenges reported with pancreas biopsy interpretation included poor reliability, lack of reporting of C4d staining, lack of reporting of rejection grading, and inconclusive interpretation of the biopsy. Staff at a third of responding programs (34%) stated that they rarely or never perform pancreas allograft biopsies and treat presumed rejection empirically. CONCLUSIONS This national survey identified significant variation in clinical practices related to pancreas allograft biopsies and potential barriers to pancreas transplant utilization across the United States. Consideration of strategies to improve program experience with percutaneous pancreas biopsy and to support optimal management of pancreas allograft rejection informed by histology is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Krista L Lentine
- Saint Louis University Transplant Center, SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | - Vidya A Fleetwood
- Saint Louis University Transplant Center, SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | | | - Tarek Alhamad
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Kennan Maher
- Saint Louis University Transplant Center, SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | - Huiling Xiao
- Saint Louis University Transplant Center, SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | | | | | - Gazi Zibari
- Willis-Knighton Health System, Shreveport, LA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rodríguez-Espinosa D, Broseta JJ, Montagud-Marrahí E, Arana C, Ferrer J, Cuatrecasas M, Garcia-Criado Á, Amor AJ, Diekmann F, Ventura-Aguiar P. Tacrolimus's Time Below Therapeutic Range Is Associated With Acute Pancreatic Graft Rejection and the Development of De Novo Donor-specific Antibodies. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12591. [PMID: 38694489 PMCID: PMC11062183 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
Tacrolimus is pivotal in pancreas transplants but poses challenges in maintaining optimal levels due to recipient differences. This study aimed to explore the utility of time spent below the therapeutic range and intrapatient variability in predicting rejection and de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) development in pancreas graft recipients. This retrospective unicentric study included adult pancreas transplant recipients between January 2006 and July 2020. Recorded variables included demographics, immunosuppression details, HLA matching, biopsy results, dnDSA development, and clinical parameters. Statistical analysis included ROC curves, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. A total of 131 patients were included. Those with biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR, 12.2%) had more time (39.9% ± 24% vs. 25.72% ± 21.57%, p = 0.016) and tests (41.95% ± 13.57% vs. 29.96% ± 17.33%, p = 0.009) below therapeutic range. Specific cutoffs of 31.5% for time and 34% for tests below the therapeutic range showed a high negative predictive value for BPAR (93.98% and 93.1%, respectively). Similarly, patients with more than 34% of tests below the therapeutic range were associated with dnDSA appearance (38.9% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.012; OR 6.135, 1.346-27.78). In pancreas transplantation, maintaining optimal tacrolimus levels is crucial. Suboptimal test percentages below the therapeutic range prove valuable in identifying acute graft rejection risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Rodríguez-Espinosa
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Jesús Broseta
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Montagud-Marrahí
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carolt Arana
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joana Ferrer
- Department of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplant, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Antonio J. Amor
- Diabetes Unit, Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Ventura-Aguiar
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Drachenberg CB, Buettner-Herold M, Aguiar PV, Horsfield C, Mikhailov AV, Papadimitriou JC, Seshan SV, Perosa M, Boggi U, Uva P, Rickels M, Grzyb K, Arend L, Cuatrecasas M, Toniolo MF, Farris AB, Renaudin K, Zhang L, Roufousse C, Gruessner A, Gruessner R, Kandaswamy R, White S, Burke G, Cantarovich D, Parsons RF, Cooper M, Kudva YC, Kukla A, Haririan A, Parajuli S, Merino-Torres JF, Argente-Pla M, Meier R, Dunn T, Ugarte R, Rao JS, Vistoli F, Stratta R, Odorico J. Banff 2022 pancreas transplantation multidisciplinary report: Refinement of guidelines for T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection and islet pathology. Assessment of duodenal cuff biopsies and noninvasive diagnostic methods. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:362-379. [PMID: 37871799 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
The Banff pancreas working schema for diagnosis and grading of rejection is widely used for treatment guidance and risk stratification in centers that perform pancreas allograft biopsies. Since the last update, various studies have provided additional insight regarding the application of the schema and enhanced our understanding of additional clinicopathologic entities. This update aims to clarify terminology and lesion description for T cell-mediated and antibody-mediated allograft rejections, in both active and chronic forms. In addition, morphologic and immunohistochemical tools are described to help distinguish rejection from nonrejection pathologies. For the first time, a clinicopathologic approach to islet pathology in the early and late posttransplant periods is discussed. This update also includes a discussion and recommendations on the utilization of endoscopic duodenal donor cuff biopsies as surrogates for pancreas biopsies in various clinical settings. Finally, an analysis and recommendations on the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA for monitoring pancreas graft recipients are provided. This multidisciplinary effort assesses the current role of pancreas allograft biopsies and offers practical guidelines that can be helpful to pancreas transplant practitioners as well as experienced pathologists and pathologists in training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maike Buettner-Herold
- Department of Nephropathology, Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU) and University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Catherine Horsfield
- Department of Histopathology/Cytology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexei V Mikhailov
- Department of Pathology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - John C Papadimitriou
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Surya V Seshan
- Division of Renal Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marcelo Perosa
- Beneficência Portuguesa and Bandeirantes Hospital of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, The province of Pisa, Italy
| | - Pablo Uva
- Kidney/Pancreas Transplant Program, Instituto de Trasplantes y Alta Complejidad (ITAC - Nephrology), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Michael Rickels
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Krzyztof Grzyb
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lois Arend
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Alton B Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Lizhi Zhang
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Candice Roufousse
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Angelika Gruessner
- Department of Nephrology/Medicine, State University of New York, New York, USA
| | - Rainer Gruessner
- Department of Surgery, State University of New York, New York, USA
| | - Raja Kandaswamy
- Division of Solid Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Steven White
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom
| | - George Burke
- Division of Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | - Ronald F Parsons
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Matthew Cooper
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Yogish C Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Aleksandra Kukla
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Abdolreza Haririan
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Sandesh Parajuli
- Department of Medicine, UWHealth Transplant Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Juan Francisco Merino-Torres
- Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, University Hospital La Fe, La Fe Health Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maria Argente-Pla
- University Hospital La Fe, Health Research Institute La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Raphael Meier
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Ty Dunn
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Penn Transplant Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Richard Ugarte
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Joseph Sushil Rao
- Division of Solid Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Schulze Diabetes Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fabio Vistoli
- Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, The province of Pisa, Italy
| | - Robert Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jon Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, UWHealth Transplant Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pierce DR, Gruessner A, Campara M, DiCocco P, Spaggiari M, Tzvetanov I, Tang I, Benedetti E, Lichvar AB. Impact of early corticosteroid withdrawal on simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant long-term outcomes: Single center experience and comparison to the International Pancreas Transplant Registry. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15063. [PMID: 37392191 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There remains a paucity of modern data comparing early steroid withdrawal (ESW) versus chronic corticosteroid (CCS) immunosuppression in simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) transplant recipients with long-term follow-up. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of ESW compared to CCS post-SPK. METHODS This was a retrospective single-center matched comparison with the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR). Patients from University of Illinois Hospital (UIH) represented the ESW group and were compared to those matched CCS patients from the IPTR. Included patients were adult recipients of a primary SPK transplant between 2003 and 2018 within the US receiving rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction. Patients were excluded if they had early technical failures, missing IPTR data, graft thrombosis, re-transplant, or positive crossmatch SPK. RESULTS A total of 156 patients were matched and included in the analysis. Patients were predominantly African American (46.15%) males (64.1%) with Type 1 diabetes etiology (92.31%). Overall pancreas allograft survival (hazard ratio [HR] = .89, 95% confidence interval [CI] .34-2.30, p = .81) and kidney allograft survival (HR = .80, 95%CI .32-2.03, p = .64) were similar between the two groups. Immunologic pancreas allograft loss was statistically similar at 1-year (ESW 1.3% vs. CCS 0%, p = .16), 5-year (ESW 1.3% vs. CCS 7.7%, p = .16), and 10-year (ESW 11.0% vs. CCS 7.7%, p = .99). The 1-year (ESW 2.6% vs. CCS 0%, p > .05), 5-year (ESW 8.3% vs. CCS 7.0%, p > .05), and 10-year (ESW 22.7% vs. CCS 9.9%, p = .2575) immunologic kidney allograft loss were also statistically similar. There was no difference in 10-year overall patient survival (ESW 76.2% vs. CCS 65.6%, p = .63). CONCLUSIONS No differences were found between allograft or patient survival post-SPK when comparing an ESW or CCS protocol. Future assessment is needed to determine differences in metabolic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana R Pierce
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Angelika Gruessner
- Department of Medicine/Nephrology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Maya Campara
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Pierpaolo DiCocco
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mario Spaggiari
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ivo Tzvetanov
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ignatius Tang
- Department of Nephrology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Enrico Benedetti
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Alicia B Lichvar
- Center for Transplantation, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Veltkamp DMJ, Nijhoff MF, van den Broek DAJ, Buntinx M, Kers J, Engelse MA, Huurman VAL, Roelen DL, Heidt S, Alwayn IPJ, de Koning EJP, de Vries APJ. Chronic Pancreas Allograft Rejection Followed by Successful HLA-Incompatible Islet Alloautotransplantation: A Novel Strategy? Transpl Int 2023; 36:11505. [PMID: 37692453 PMCID: PMC10484093 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of pancreas or islet transplantation is to restore glycemic control in order to mitigate diabetes-related complications and prevent severe hypoglycemia. Complications from chronic pancreas allograft rejection may lead to transplantectomy, even when the endocrine function remains preserved. We present first evidence of a successful HLA incompatible islet re-transplantation with islets isolated from a rejecting pancreas allograft after simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation. The pancreas allograft was removed because of progressively painful pancreatic panniculitis from clinically uncontrolled chronic rejection. The endocrine function was preserved. Induction treatment for this "islet alloautotransplantation" consisted of plasmapheresis, IVIg and alemtuzumab. At 1 year, the patient retained islet graft function with good glycemic control and absence of severe hypoglycemia, despite persistent low-grade HLA donor-specific antibodies. His panniculitis had resolved completely. In our point of view, islet alloautotransplantation derived from a chronically rejecting pancreas allograft is a potential option to salvage (partial) islet function, despite preformed donor-specific antibodies, in order to maintain stable glycemic control. Thereby it protects against severe hypoglycemia, and it potentially mitigates kidney graft dysfunction and other diabetes-related complications in patients with continued need for immunosuppression and who are otherwise difficult to retransplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise M. J. Veltkamp
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Michiel F. Nijhoff
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Dennis A. J. van den Broek
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Maren Buntinx
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jesper Kers
- Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Marten A. Engelse
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Volkert A. L. Huurman
- Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Dave L. Roelen
- Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Ian P. J. Alwayn
- Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Eelco J. P. de Koning
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Aiko P. J. de Vries
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vidigal AC, de Lucena DD, Beyerstedt S, Rangel ÉB. A comprehensive update of the metabolic and toxicological considerations for immunosuppressive drugs used during pancreas transplantation. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2023; 19:405-427. [PMID: 37542452 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2023.2243808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite significant advancements in immunosuppressive regimens and surgical techniques, the prevalence of adverse events related to immunosuppression remains a major challenge affecting the long-term survival rates of pancreas and kidney allografts. AREAS COVERED This article presents a comprehensive review of the literature and knowledge (Jan/2012-Feb/2023) concerning glucose metabolism disorders and nephrotoxicity associated with tacrolimus and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi). Novel signaling pathways potentially implicated in these adverse events are discussed. Furthermore, we extensively examine the findings from clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus, mTORi, and steroid minimization. EXPERT OPINION Tacrolimus-based regimens continue to be the standard treatment following pancreas transplants. However, prolonged use of tacrolimus and mTORi may lead to hyperglycemia and nephrotoxicity. Understanding and interpreting experimental data, particularly concerning novel signaling pathways beyond calcineurin-NFAT and mTOR pathways, can offer valuable insights for therapeutic interventions to mitigate hyperglycemia and nephrotoxicity. Additionally, critically analyzing clinical trial results can identify opportunities for personalized safety-based approaches to minimize side effects. It is imperative to conduct randomized-controlled studies to assess the impact of mTORi use and steroid-free protocols on pancreatic allograft survival. Such studies will aid in tailoring treatment strategies for improved transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Cláudia Vidigal
- Nephrology Division, Department of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Débora D de Lucena
- Nephrology Division, Department of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Stephany Beyerstedt
- Albert Einstein Research and Education Institute, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, SP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Érika B Rangel
- Nephrology Division, Department of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Albert Einstein Research and Education Institute, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, SP, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Farshbafnadi M, Razi S, Rezaei N. Transplantation. Clin Immunol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818006-8.00008-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
8
|
Rovira J, Ramirez-Bajo MJ, Bañón-Maneus E, Hierro-Garcia N, Lazo-Rodriguez M, Piñeiro GJ, Montagud-Marrahi E, Cucchiari D, Revuelta I, Cuatrecasas M, Campistol JM, Ricart MJ, Diekmann F, Garcia-Criado A, Ventura-Aguiar P. Immune Profiling of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells at Pancreas Acute Rejection Episodes in Kidney-Pancreas Transplant Recipients. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10639. [PMID: 36466442 PMCID: PMC9715609 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Profiling of circulating immune cells provides valuable insight to the pathophysiology of acute rejection in organ transplantation. Herein we characterized the peripheral blood mononuclear cells in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients. We conducted a retrospective analysis in a biopsy-matched cohort (n = 67) and compared patients with biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR; 41%) to those without rejection (No-AR). We observed that CD3+ T cells, both CD8+ and CD4+, as well as CD19+ B cells were increased in patients with BPAR, particularly in biopsies performed in the early post-transplant period (<3 months). During this period immune subsets presented a good discriminative ability (CD4+ AUC 0.79; CD8+ AUC 0.80; B cells AUC 0.86; p < 0.05) and outperformed lipase (AUC 0.62; p = 0.12) for the diagnosis of acute rejection. We further evaluated whether this could be explained by differences in frequencies prior to transplantation. Patients presenting with early post-transplant rejection (<3 months) had a significant increase in T-cell frequencies pre-transplant, both CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells (p < 0.01), which were associated with a significant inferior rejection-free graft survival. T cell frequencies in peripheral blood correlated with pancreas acute rejection episodes, and variations prior to transplantation were associated with pancreas early acute rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Rovira
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Jose Ramirez-Bajo
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisenda Bañón-Maneus
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Natalia Hierro-Garcia
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Lazo-Rodriguez
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gaston J. Piñeiro
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Montagud-Marrahi
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Cucchiari
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Madrid, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miriam Cuatrecasas
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep M. Campistol
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Jose Ricart
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Madrid, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Angeles Garcia-Criado
- Radiology Department, Center for Imaging Diagnosis, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Ventura-Aguiar
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,*Correspondence: Pedro Ventura-Aguiar,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ventura-Aguiar P, Ramirez-Bajo MJ, Rovira J, Bañón-Maneus E, Hierro N, Lazo M, Cuatrecasas M, Garcia-Criado M, Liang N, Swenerton RK, Cofan F, Cucchiari D, Esforzado N, Montagud-Marrahi E, Oppenheimer F, Piñeiro G, Revuelta I, Torregrosa V, Ahmed E, Soboleva K, Kaur N, Zimmermann BG, Al Haj Baddar N, Demko ZP, Escrig C, Tabriziani H, Gauthier P, Billings PR, Amor AJ, Ferrer J, Campistol JM, Diekmann F. Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Shows High Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Pancreas Graft Rejection in Simultaneous Pancreas-kidney Transplantation. Transplantation 2022; 106:1690-1697. [PMID: 35289777 PMCID: PMC9311279 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreas graft status in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPKTx) is currently assessed by nonspecific biochemical markers, typically amylase or lipase. Identifying a noninvasive biomarker with good sensitivity in detecting early pancreas graft rejection could improve SPKTx management. METHODS Here, we developed a pilot study to explore donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) performance in predicting biopsy-proven acute rejection (P-BPAR) of the pancreas graft in a cohort of 36 SPKTx recipients with biopsy-matched plasma samples. dd-cfDNA was measured using the Prospera test (Natera, Inc.) and reported both as a fraction of the total cfDNA (fraction; %) and as concentration in the recipient's plasma (quantity; copies/mL). RESULTS In the absence of P-BPAR, dd-cfDNA was significantly higher in samples collected within the first 45 d after SPKTx compared with those measured afterward (median, 1.00% versus 0.30%; median, 128.2 versus 35.3 cp/mL, respectively with both; P = 0.001). In samples obtained beyond day 45, P-BPAR samples presented a significantly higher dd-cfDNA fraction (0.83 versus 0.30%; P = 0.006) and quantity (81.3 versus 35.3 cp/mL; P = 0.001) than stable samples. Incorporating dd-cfDNA quantity along with dd-cfDNA fraction outperformed dd-cfDNA fraction alone to detect active rejection. Notably, when using a quantity cutoff of 70 cp/mL, dd-cfDNA detected P-BPAR with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 93.7%, which was more accurate than current biomarkers (area under curve of 0.89 for dd-cfDNA (cp/ml) compared with 0.74 of lipase and 0.46 for amylase). CONCLUSIONS dd-cfDNA measurement through a simple noninvasive blood test could be incorporated into clinical practice to help inform graft management in SPKTx patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Ventura-Aguiar
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Jose Ramirez-Bajo
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Jordi Rovira
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisenda Bañón-Maneus
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Natalia Hierro
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Lazo
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Miriam Cuatrecasas
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M.A. Garcia-Criado
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Federic Cofan
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - David Cucchiari
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nuria Esforzado
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Montagud-Marrahi
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Federic Oppenheimer
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Gaston Piñeiro
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Vicens Torregrosa
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ebad Ahmed
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Karina Soboleva
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Navchetan Kaur
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bernhard G. Zimmermann
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nour Al Haj Baddar
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Zachary P. Demko
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cesar Escrig
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hossein Tabriziani
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Philippe Gauthier
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paul R. Billings
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio J. Amor
- Radiology Department, Center for Imaging Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joana Ferrer
- Endocrinology Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep M. Campistol
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nakamura T, Shirouzu T. Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Recurrent Primary Disease: Two Main Obstacles in Abdominal Kidney, Liver, and Pancreas Transplants. J Clin Med 2021; 10:5417. [PMID: 34830699 PMCID: PMC8619797 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The advances in acute phase care have firmly established the practice of organ transplantation in the last several decades. Then, the next issues that loom large in the field of transplantation include antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and recurrent primary disease. Acute ABMR is a daunting hurdle in the performance of organ transplantation. The recent progress in desensitization and preoperative monitoring of donor-specific antibodies enables us to increase positive outcomes. However, chronic active ABMR is one of the most significant problems we currently face. On the other hand, recurrent primary disease is problematic for many recipients. Notably, some recipients, unfortunately, lost their vital organs due to this recurrence. Although some progress has been achieved in these two areas, many other factors remain largely obscure. In this review, these two topics will be discussed in light of recent discoveries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsukasa Nakamura
- Department of Organ Transplantation and General Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kajii-cho 465, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
| | - Takayuki Shirouzu
- Molecular Diagnositcs Division, Wakunaga Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 13-4 Arakicho, shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0007, Japan;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chellappa S, Kushekhar K, Hagness M, Horneland R, Taskén K, Aandahl EM. The Presence of Activated T Cell Subsets prior to Transplantation Is Associated with Increased Rejection Risk in Pancreas Transplant Recipients. THE JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY 2021; 207:2501-2511. [PMID: 34607938 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2001103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Pancreas and islet transplantation (PTx) are currently the only curative treatment options for type 1 diabetes. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells play a pivotal role in graft function, rejection, and survival. However, characterization of immune cell status from patients with and without rejection of the pancreas graft is lacking. We performed multiparameter immune phenotyping of T cells from PTx patients prior to and 1 y post-PTx in nonrejectors and histologically confirmed rejectors. Our results suggest that rejection is associated with presence of elevated levels of activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells with a gut-homing phenotype both prior to and 1 y post-PTx. The CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were highly differentiated, with elevated levels of type 1 inflammatory markers (T-bet and INF-γ) and cytotoxic components (granzyme B and perforin). Furthermore, we observed increased levels of activated FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in rejectors, which was associated with a hyporesponsive phenotype of activated effector T cells. Finally, activated T and B cell status was correlated in PTx patients, indicating a potential interplay between these cell types. In vitro treatment of healthy CD4+ and CD8+ T cells with tacrolimus abrogated the proliferation and cytokine (INF-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α) secretion associated with the type 1 inflammatory phenotype observed in pre- and post-PTx rejectors. Together, our results suggest the presence of activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells prior to PTx confer increased risk for rejection. These findings may be used to identify patients that may benefit from more intense immunosuppressive treatment that should be monitored more closely after transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stalin Chellappa
- Department of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Centre for Cancer Immunotherapy, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; and
| | - Kushi Kushekhar
- Department of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Centre for Cancer Immunotherapy, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; and
| | - Morten Hagness
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rune Horneland
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kjetil Taskén
- Department of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Centre for Cancer Immunotherapy, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; and
| | - Einar Martin Aandahl
- Department of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; .,K.G. Jebsen Centre for Cancer Immunotherapy, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; and.,Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Khan SM, Sumbal R, Schenk AD. Impact of Anti-HLA De Novo Donor Specific Antibody on Graft Outcomes in Pancreas Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis. Transplant Proc 2021; 53:3022-3029. [PMID: 34772490 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.08.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this review is to provide consensus on the impact of antihuman leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA) de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) on pancreatic allograft loss. METHODS We systematically searched electronic databases through August 2020 using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. Articles that provided or allowed estimation of the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for pancreatic allograft loss in patients with and without anti-HLA dnDSA were included. RESULTS Eight studies with a total of 1434 patients were included. Patients with anti-HLA dnDSA had significantly higher odds of graft failure (OR = 4.42, 95% CI [3.15-6.22], I2 = 38%). Pooled data on graft rejection showed that patients with anti-HLA dnDSA have significantly higher odds of rejection than patients without anti-HLA (OR = 3.35, 95% CI [2.28-4.91], I2 = 38%). CONCLUSION The results of our meta-analysis show that anti-HLA dnDSA is strongly associated with pancreas graft failure and rejection. Surveillance for anti-HLA dnDSA is an important component of post-transplant immune monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sualeh Muslim Khan
- Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
| | - Ramish Sumbal
- Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Austin D Schenk
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Del Bello A, Gaible C, Longlune N, Hebral AL, Esposito L, Gandia P, Kamar N. Tacrolimus Intrapatient Variability After Switching From Immediate or Prolonged-Release to Extended-Release Formulation, After an Organ Transplantation. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:602764. [PMID: 34690747 PMCID: PMC8529208 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.602764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Several formulations of tacrolimus are available, but evidence of the benefit of changing to the most recent formulations is lacking. Tacrolimus intra-patient variability (tacrolimus IPV) is an emerging risk factor associated with poor graft outcomes after solid organ transplantations. Here, we examined the modifications of tacrolimus IPV after switching to a different formulation of tacrolimus. Experimental Approach: We identified 353 solid organ transplant recipients that were switched in our center from immediate-release (IR-tacrolimus) or prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-tacrolimus) to extended-release, LCP-tacrolimus (LCP-tacrolimus). Among them, 54 patients underwent at least 3 available tacrolimus blood concentrations before and after the switch, allowing us to investigate tacrolimus IPV. Key Results: The switch was considered as a safe procedure since only four of the 353 patients presented a graft rejection after the switch, and no patient was hospitalized for tacrolimus overdose. The tacrolimus IPV estimated by the coefficient of variation (CV-IPV) was stable before and after the switch to LCP-tacrolimus (CV-IPV: 29.0% (IQR 25-75 (15.5; 38.5) before and 24.0% (15.8; 36.5) after the switch, p = 0.65). Conclusion and Implications: Switching from IR- or PR-tacrolimus to LCP-tacrolimus is a safe procedure. However, the CV-tacrolimus IPV was not impacted by the change of formulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Del Bello
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France.,INSERM U1043, IFR-BMT, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France.,Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Clotilde Gaible
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Nathalie Longlune
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Anne-Laure Hebral
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Laure Esposito
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Peggy Gandia
- Pharmacokinetics and Toxicology Laboratory, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.,INTHERES, INRAE, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France.,INSERM U1043, IFR-BMT, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France.,Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Argente-Pla M, Martínez-Millana A, Espí-Reig J, Maupoey-Ibáñez J, Moya-Herráiz Á, Beneyto-Castello I, López-Andújar R, Merino-Torres JF. Results after 13 years of kidney-pancreas transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients in Comunidad Valenciana. Cir Esp 2021; 99:666-677. [PMID: 34674986 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2021.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant is a proven option of treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and related end-stage renal disease, who are candidates for kidney transplantation. The results from the beginning of SPK transplant program in Comunidad Valenciana are presented. METHODS Descriptive, retrospective, and single-center study of the pancreas transplant performed at the Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, from September 2002 to December 2015. Clinical variables from donors and recipients, peri-operative variables, patient survival, and pancreatic graft survival were collected. RESULTS Eighty-one patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (48 males and 33 females, mean age 37.4 ± 5.7 years, mean BMI 24.1 ± 3.4 kg/m2, mean duration of diabetes 25.5 ± 6.5 years) received SPK transplantation. The overall patient survival at one, 3, and 5 years were 91.3%, 91.3% and 89.5%, respectively. However, patient survival in the periods 2002-2008 and 2009-2015 were 88.2% and 93.6% at one year, 88.2% and 93.7% at 3 years, and 85.3% and 93.7% at 5 years, respectively (P = 1). The overall pancreatic graft survival at one, 3, and 5 years were 75.2%, 69.1% and 63.2%, respectively. On the other hand, pancreatic graft survival in the periods 2002-2008 and 2009-2015 were 67.5% and 80.6% at one year, 64.7% and 71.8% at 3 years, and 58.8% and 65.3% at 5 years, respectively (P = .0109). Post-transplant complications were: graft rejection 8.6%, venous graft thrombosis 7.4%, graft pancreatitis 4.9%. CONCLUSIONS In 13 years' experience of SPK transplantation, patient and pancreatic graft survival and the rate of complications after pancreas transplantation were similar to those of other larger series. The medical-surgical team experience improves pancreatic graft survival without influencing patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Argente-Pla
- Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Endocrinología, Nutrición y Dietética, Instituto de Investigación La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
| | | | - Jordi Espí-Reig
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Javier Maupoey-Ibáñez
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Unidad de Trasplante, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ángel Moya-Herráiz
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Unidad de Trasplante, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Rafael López-Andújar
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Unidad de Trasplante, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Juan Francisco Merino-Torres
- Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Endocrinología, Nutrición y Dietética, Instituto de Investigación La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Departament de Medicina, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Boggi U, Vistoli F, Andres A, Arbogast HP, Badet L, Baronti W, Bartlett ST, Benedetti E, Branchereau J, Burke GW, Buron F, Caldara R, Cardillo M, Casanova D, Cipriani F, Cooper M, Cupisti A, Davide J, Drachenberg C, de Koning EJP, Ettorre GM, Fernandez Cruz L, Fridell JA, Friend PJ, Furian L, Gaber OA, Gruessner AC, Gruessner RW, Gunton JE, Han D, Iacopi S, Kauffmann EF, Kaufman D, Kenmochi T, Khambalia HA, Lai Q, Langer RM, Maffi P, Marselli L, Menichetti F, Miccoli M, Mittal S, Morelon E, Napoli N, Neri F, Oberholzer J, Odorico JS, Öllinger R, Oniscu G, Orlando G, Ortenzi M, Perosa M, Perrone VG, Pleass H, Redfield RR, Ricci C, Rigotti P, Paul Robertson R, Ross LF, Rossi M, Saudek F, Scalea JR, Schenker P, Secchi A, Socci C, Sousa Silva D, Squifflet JP, Stock PG, Stratta RJ, Terrenzio C, Uva P, Watson CJ, White SA, Marchetti P, Kandaswamy R, Berney T. First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations. Am J Transplant 2021; 21 Suppl 3:17-59. [PMID: 34245223 PMCID: PMC8518376 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.
Collapse
|
16
|
Büttner-Herold M, Amann K, Pfister F, Tannapfel A, Maslova M, Wunsch A, Pillokeit N, Viebahn R, Schenker P. [Pancreas transplantation-clinic, technique, and histological assessment]. DER PATHOLOGE 2021; 42:509-523. [PMID: 34415383 PMCID: PMC8390418 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-021-00982-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Germany pancreas transplants are performed in only a few selected and specialized centres, usually combined with a kidney transplant. Knowlegde of the indications for and techniques of transplantation as well as of the histopathological assessment for rejection in pancreas and duodenal biopsies is not very widespread. AIM To give an overview of the development and status quo in pancreas-kidney-transplantation in Germany summarizing the experience of the largest German pancreas transplant centre and to give a résumé of the results of histological diagnoses of biopsy specimens submitted between 06/2017 and 12/2020. Moreover, a detailed description and illustration of histological findings is included. MATERIAL AND METHODS A thorough literature search for aspects of the history, technique and indication for pancreas transplantation was performed and discussed in the context of the local experience and technical particularities specific for the transplant centre in Bochum. The occurrence of complications was compared with international reports. Results of pancreas and duodenal biopsies submitted to Erlangen between 06/2017 and 12/2020 for histological evaluation, which were evaluated according to the Banff classification, were summarized. For a better understanding key histological findings of pancreas rejection and differential diagnoses were illustrated and discussed. RESULTS A total of 93 pancreas transplant specimens and 3 duodenal biopsies were included. 34.4% of pancreas specimens did not contain representative material for a diagnosis. In the remaining 61 biopsies 24.6% showed no rejection, 62.3% were diagnosed with acute T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) and 8.2% with signs suspicious of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Acute acinary epithelial injury was seen in 59%, pancreatitis in 8.2% and allograft fibrosis was reported in as many as 54.1%. Calcineurin-inhibitor toxicity was discussed in only 4.9%. CONCLUSION Pancreas-kidney-transplantation and standardized histological assessment of the transplanted pancreas or rarely duodenum with reporting according to the updated Banff classification of pancreas transplants or previous reports of duodenal rejection are important mainstays in the management of patients with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maike Büttner-Herold
- Abt. Nephropathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Krankenhausstr. 8-10, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Kerstin Amann
- Abt. Nephropathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Krankenhausstr. 8-10, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
| | - Frederick Pfister
- Abt. Nephropathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Krankenhausstr. 8-10, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Andrea Tannapfel
- Institut für Pathologie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - Marina Maslova
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Wunsch
- Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - Nina Pillokeit
- Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - Richard Viebahn
- Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - Peter Schenker
- Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Moris D, Cendales LC. Sensitization and Desensitization in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation. Front Immunol 2021; 12:682180. [PMID: 34456906 PMCID: PMC8385557 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.682180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is a field under research and has emerged as an alternative option for the repair of severe disfiguring defects that result from severe tissue loss in a selected group of patients. Lifelong immunosuppressive therapy, immunosuppression associated complications, and the effects of the host immune response in the graft are major concerns in this type of quality-of-life transplant. The initial management of extensive soft tissue injury can lead to the development of anti-HLA antibodies through injury-related factors, transfusion and cadaveric grafting. The role of antibody-mediated rejection, donor-specific antibody (DSA) formation and graft rejection in the context of VCA still remain poorly understood. The most common antigenic target of preexisting alloantibodies are MHC mismatches, though recognition of ABO incompatible antigens, minor histocompatibility complexes and endothelial cells has also been shown to contribute to rejection. Mechanistically, alloantibody-mediated tissue damage occurs primarily through complement fixation as well as through antibody-dependent cellular toxicity. If DSA exist, activation of complement and coagulation cascades can result in vascular thrombosis and infarction and thus rejection and graft loss. Both preexisting DSA but especially de-novo DSA are currently considered as main contributors to late allograft injury and graft failure. Desensitization protocols are currently being developed for VCA, mainly including removal of alloantibodies whereas treatment of established antibody-mediated rejection is achieved through high dose intravenous immunoglobulins. The long-term efficacy of such therapies in sensitized VCA recipients is currently unknown. The current evidence base for sensitizing events and outcomes in reconstructive transplantation is limited. However, current data show that VCA transplantation has been performed in the setting of HLA-sensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Linda C. Cendales
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lehner LJ, Öllinger R, Globke B, Naik MG, Budde K, Pratschke J, Eckardt KU, Kahl A, Zhang K, Halleck F. Impact of Early Pancreatic Graft Loss on Outcome after Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation (SPKT)-A Landmark Analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10153237. [PMID: 34362019 PMCID: PMC8347953 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10153237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) is a standard therapeutic option for patients with diabetes mellitus type I and kidney failure. Early pancreas allograft failure is a complication potentially associated with worse outcomes. (2) Methods: We performed a landmark analysis to assess the impact of early pancreas graft loss within 3 months on mortality and kidney graft survival over 10 years. This retrospective single-center study included 114 adult patients who underwent an SPKT between 2005 and 2018. (3) Results: Pancreas graft survival rate was 85.1% at 3 months. The main causes of early pancreas graft loss were thrombosis (6.1%), necrosis (2.6%), and pancreatitis (2.6%). Early pancreas graft loss was not associated with reduced patient survival (p = 0.168) or major adverse cerebral or cardiovascular events over 10 years (p = 0.741) compared to patients with functioning pancreas, after 3 months. Moreover, kidney graft function (p = 0.494) and survival (p = 0.461) were not significantly influenced by early pancreas graft loss. (4) Conclusion: In this study, using the landmark analysis technique, early pancreas graft loss within 3 months did not significantly impact patient or kidney graft survival over 10 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Johannes Lehner
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.G.N.); (K.B.); (K.-U.E.); (A.K.); (F.H.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-30-45-051-4002
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Department of Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (R.Ö.); (B.G.); (J.P.)
| | - Brigitta Globke
- Department of Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (R.Ö.); (B.G.); (J.P.)
| | - Marcel G. Naik
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.G.N.); (K.B.); (K.-U.E.); (A.K.); (F.H.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.G.N.); (K.B.); (K.-U.E.); (A.K.); (F.H.)
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (R.Ö.); (B.G.); (J.P.)
| | - Kai-Uwe Eckardt
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.G.N.); (K.B.); (K.-U.E.); (A.K.); (F.H.)
| | - Andreas Kahl
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.G.N.); (K.B.); (K.-U.E.); (A.K.); (F.H.)
| | - Kun Zhang
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10117 Berlin, Germany;
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Halleck
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.G.N.); (K.B.); (K.-U.E.); (A.K.); (F.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Joher N, Matignon M, Grimbert P. HLA Desensitization in Solid Organ Transplantation: Anti-CD38 to Across the Immunological Barriers. Front Immunol 2021; 12:688301. [PMID: 34093594 PMCID: PMC8173048 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.688301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of anti-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in the potential solid organ transplant recipient's blood is one of the main barriers to access to a transplantation. The HLA sensitization is associated with longer waitlist time, antibody mediated rejection and transplant lost leading to increased recipient's morbidity and mortality. However, solid organ transplantation across the HLA immunological barriers have been reported in recipients who were highly sensitized to HLA using desensitization protocols. These desensitization regimens are focused on the reduction of circulating HLA antibodies. Despite those strategies improve rates of transplantation, it remains several limitations including persistent high rejection rate and worse long-term outcomes when compare with non-sensitized recipient population. Currently, interest is growing in the development of new desensitization approaches which, beyond targeting antibodies, would be based on the modulation of alloimmune pathways. Plasma cells appears as an interesting target given their critical role in antibody production. In the last decade, CD38-targeting immunotherapies, such as daratumumab, have been recognized as a key component in the treatment of myeloma by inducing an important plasma cell depletion. This review focuses on an emerging concept based on targeting CD38 to desensitize in the field of transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nizar Joher
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Henri Mondor, Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (Innovative Therapy for Immune Disorders), Créteil, France.,Université Paris Est Créteil UPEC, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale INSERM U955, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale IMRB, Équipe 21, Créteil, France
| | - Marie Matignon
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Henri Mondor, Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (Innovative Therapy for Immune Disorders), Créteil, France.,Université Paris Est Créteil UPEC, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale INSERM U955, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale IMRB, Équipe 21, Créteil, France
| | - Philippe Grimbert
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Henri Mondor, Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (Innovative Therapy for Immune Disorders), Créteil, France.,Université Paris Est Créteil UPEC, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale INSERM U955, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale IMRB, Équipe 21, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Evaluation of Graft Fibrosis, Inflammation and Donor-specific Antibodies at Protocol Liver Biopsies in Pediatric Liver Transplant Patients: a Single Center Experience. Transplantation 2021; 106:85-95. [PMID: 33496554 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of graft fibrosis and inflammation on the natural history of pediatric liver transplants (LT) is still debated. Our objectives were to evaluate the evolution of posttransplant fibrosis and inflammation over time at protocol liver biopsies (PLBs), risk factors for fibrosis, presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and/or their correlation with graft and recipient factors. METHODS A single-center, retrospective (2000-2019) cross-sectional study on pediatric LT recipients who had at least one PLB, followed by a longitudinal evaluation in those who had at least two PLBs, was conducted. Fibrosis was assessed by the Liver Allograft Fibrosis Semiquantitative score, inflammation by the Rejection Activity Index, DSAs by Luminex®. RESULTS A total of 134 PLBs from 94 patients were included. Fibrosis was detected in 87% (30% mild, 45% moderate, 12% severe), 80% in the portal tracts. There was an increase in fibrosis between the 1-3 and the 4-6 year group (p=0.01), then it was stable. Inflammation was observed in 44% (30% mild, 13% moderate, 1% severe), 90% in the portal tracts. Anti-HLA II (IgG) DSAs were detected in 14/40 (35%). Portal fibrosis was associated with portal inflammation in the 1-3 year group (p=0.04). Low immunosuppression levels were correlated with sinusoidal fibrosis (p=0.04) and DSA positivity (p-value=0.006). There was no statistically significant correlation between DSA positivity and the presence of graft fibrosis or inflammation. CONCLUSIONS This study corroborates the concept of an early evolution of silent graft fibrosis. Suboptimal immunosuppression may play a role in the development of fibrosis and DSAs.
Collapse
|
21
|
Ibáñez JM, Robledo AB, López-Andujar R. Late complications of pancreas transplant. World J Transplant 2020; 10:404-414. [PMID: 33437673 PMCID: PMC7769730 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i12.404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
To summarize the long-term complications after pancreas transplantation that affect graft function, a literature search was carried out on the long-term complications of pancreatic transplantation, namely, complications from postoperative 3rd mo onwards, in terms of loss of graft function, late infection and vascular complications as pseudoaneurysms. The most relevant reviews and studies were selected to obtain the current evidence on these topics. The definition of graft failure varies among different studies, so it is difficult to evaluate, a standardized definition is of utmost importance to know the magnitude of the problem in all worldwide series. Chronic rejection is the main cause of long-term graft failure, occurring in 10% of patients. From the 3rd mo of transplantation onwards, the main risk factor for late infections is immunosuppression, and patients have opportunistic infections like: Cytomegalovirus, hepatitis B and C viruses, Epstein-Barr virus and varicella-zoster virus; opportunistic bacteria, reactivation of latent infections as tuberculosis or fungal infections. Complete preoperative studies and serological tests should be made in all recipients to avoid these infections, adding perioperative prophylactic treatments when indicated. Pseudoaneurysm are uncommon, but one of the main causes of late bleeding, which can be fatal. The treatment should be performed with radiological endovascular approaches or open surgery in case of failure. Despite all therapeutic options for the complications mentioned above, transplantectomy is a necessary option in approximately 50% of relaparotomies, especially in life-threatening complications. Late complications in pancreatic transplantation threatens long-term graft function. An exhaustive follow-up as well as a correct immunosuppression protocol are necessary for prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Maupoey Ibáñez
- Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia 46026, Spain
| | - Andrea Boscà Robledo
- Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia 46026, Spain
| | - Rafael López-Andujar
- Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia 46026, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Argente-Pla M, Martínez-Millana A, Espí-Reig J, Maupoey-Ibáñez J, Moya-Herráiz Á, Beneyto-Castello I, López-Andújar R, Merino-Torres JF. Results after 13 years of kidney-pancreas transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients in Comunidad Valenciana. Cir Esp 2020; 99:S0009-739X(20)30312-2. [PMID: 33341241 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant is a proven option of treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and related end-stage renal disease, who are candidates for kidney transplantation. The results from the beginning of SPK transplant program in Comunidad Valenciana are presented. METHODS Descriptive, retrospective, and single-center study of the pancreas transplant performed at the Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, from September 2002 to December 2015. Clinical variables from donors and recipients, peri-operative variables, patient survival, and pancreatic graft survival were collected. RESULTS Eighty-one patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (48 males and 33 females, mean age 37.4±5.7 years, mean BMI 24.1±3.4kg/m2, mean duration of diabetes 25.5±6.5 years) received SPK transplantation. The overall patient survival at one, 3, and 5 years were 91,3, 91,3 and 89,5%, respectively. However, patient survival in the periods 2002-2008 and 2009-2015 were 88.2 and 93.6% at one year, 88.2 and 93.7% at 3 years, and 85.3 and 93.7% at 5 years, respectively (P=1). The overall pancreatic graft survival at one, 3, and 5 years were 75.2, 69.1 and 63.2%, respectively. On the other hand, pancreatic graft survival in the periods 2002-2008 and 2009-2015 were 67.5 and 80.6% at one year, 64.7 and 71.8% at 3 years, and 58.8% and 65.3% at 5 years, respectively (P=.0109). Postransplant complications were: graft rejection 8.6%, venous graft thrombosis 7.4%, graft pancreatitis 4.9%. CONCLUSIONS In 13-year's experience of SPK transplantation, patient and pancreatic graft survival and the rate of complications after pancreas transplantation were similar to those of other larger series. The medical-surgical team experience improves pancreatic graft survival without influencing patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Argente-Pla
- Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España; Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Endocrinología, Nutrición y Dietética, Instituto de Investigación La Fe, Valencia, España.
| | | | - Jordi Espí-Reig
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - Javier Maupoey-Ibáñez
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Unidad de Trasplante, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - Ángel Moya-Herráiz
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Unidad de Trasplante, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España; CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España
| | | | - Rafael López-Andújar
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Unidad de Trasplante, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España; CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España
| | - Juan Francisco Merino-Torres
- Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España; Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Endocrinología, Nutrición y Dietética, Instituto de Investigación La Fe, Valencia, España; Departament de Medicina, Universitat de València, Valencia, España
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Al-Qaoud TM, Odorico JS, Al-Adra DP, Kaufman DB, Sollinger HW, Leverson G, Welch B, Redfield RR. Pancreas transplants from small donors: are the outcomes acceptable? A retrospective study. Transpl Int 2020; 33:1437-1446. [PMID: 32749728 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Despite good organ quality, pancreata from extremely small pediatric donors (<30 kg) are generally avoided by many centers because of concerns of reduced islet cell mass and early technical failure. Therefore, we sought to compare the outcomes of small pancreas grafts (<30 kg) to those from higher weight donors from transplants performed between 1994 and 2015 (n = 1183). A total of 33 pancreata were from donors' ≤30 kg (3%), with a mean weight of 23.8 kg and mean age of 7.8 years. Patient survival was similar at 1, 5, and 10 years between recipients of ≤30 and >30 kg donors (≤30 kg: 96.8%, 86.8%, and 78.1% vs. >30 kg: 96.8%, 89.5%, and 79.1%, P = 0.5). Pancreas graft survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was also similar, ≤30 kg: 93.9%, 73.2%, and 61.0% vs. >30 kg: 87%, 73.3%, and 58.3% (P = 0.7). This graft survival pattern was also seen when comparing pancreata from ≤20 kg donors to those from >20 to 30 kg. Cause of graft loss, and metabolic and physiologic outcomes did not differ between the groups. After assessing the impact of donor weight as a continuous variable and calculating recipient-to-donor weight ratio (RDWR), we observed no effect of donor weight on patient and graft outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talal M Al-Qaoud
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jon S Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - David P Al-Adra
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Dixon B Kaufman
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Hans W Sollinger
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Glen Leverson
- Division of Research, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Bridget Welch
- Division of Research, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Robert R Redfield
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Despite significant improvement in pancreas allograft survival, rejection continues to be a major clinical problem. This review will focus on emerging literature related to the impact of pretransplant and de-novo DSA (dnDSA) in pancreas transplant recipients, and the diagnosis and treatment of T-cell-medicated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in this complex group of patients. RECENT FINDINGS Recent data suggest that pretransplant DSA and the emergence of dnDSA in pancreas transplant recipients are both associated with increased risk of ABMR. The pancreas allograft biopsy is essential for the specific diagnosis of TCMR and/or ABMR, distinguish rejection from other causes of graft dysfunction, and to guide-targeted therapy. This distinction is important especially in the setting of solitary pancreas transplants but also in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants where solid evidence has now emerged demonstrating discordant biopsy findings. Treatment of rejection in a functioning pancreas can prolong allograft survival. SUMMARY The accurate and timely diagnosis of active alloimmune destruction in pancreas transplant recipients is paramount to preserving graft function in the long term. This review will discuss new, rapidly evolving information that is valuable for the physician caring for these patients to achieve optimal immunological outcomes.
Collapse
|
25
|
Uva PD, Quevedo A, Roses J, Toniolo MF, Pilotti R, Chuluyan E, Casadei DH. Anti-Hla donor-specific antibody monitoring in pancreas transplantation: Role of protocol biopsies. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e13998. [PMID: 32492226 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
In kidney transplantation, de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) correlate with poor graft survival, and Consensus Guidelines recommend a protocol biopsy. In pancreas transplantation, DSA are also associated with poor graft outcomes; however, there are no recommendations on protocol biopsies. We started an antibody screening protocol on pancreas transplant patients at 0, 3, 6, 12 months, and yearly. Patients with DSA or high MFI non-DSA were considered for protocol biopsies of both organs. Results: 143 pancreas recipients were screened. 84 patients had negative antibodies throughout the study, 11 patients were found to have antibodies at graft dysfunction, and 48 patients had positive antibodies at screening without acute organ dysfunction (study group). Among the 30 non-DSA patients, 9 had protocol simultaneous pancreas and kidney biopsies performed with negative results in all of them. In contrast, among the 18 DSA patients, 15 had these biopsies performed, and 47% presented with subclinical rejection of the kidney, the pancreas, or both. In addition, some of the DSA patients without a protocol biopsy presented with rejection during the first 15 months of follow-up. Conclusion: We conclude that protocol biopsies of both grafts may play a role in the follow-up of pancreas transplant patients with de novo DSA appearance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Daniel Uva
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Trasplantes y Alta Complejidad (ITAC - Nephrology), Buenos Aires, Argentina.,CEFYBO - CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Alejandra Quevedo
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Trasplantes y Alta Complejidad (ITAC - Nephrology), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Josefina Roses
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Trasplantes y Alta Complejidad (ITAC - Nephrology), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - María Fernanda Toniolo
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Trasplantes y Alta Complejidad (ITAC - Nephrology), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Roxana Pilotti
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Trasplantes y Alta Complejidad (ITAC - Nephrology), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Domingo H Casadei
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Trasplantes y Alta Complejidad (ITAC - Nephrology), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Enteric Conversion of Bladder-drained Pancreas as a Predictor of Outcomes in Almost 600 Recipients at a Single Center. Transplant Direct 2020; 6:e550. [PMID: 32548244 PMCID: PMC7213611 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000000997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Complications associated with bladder-drained pancreata necessitating enteric conversion are common. Data on the outcomes after enteric conversion are conflicting. We studied the association between enteric conversion and the pancreas graft rejection, loss, and mortality. Methods At our center, 1117 pancreas transplants were performed between 2000 and 2016. We analyzed 593 recipients with bladder-drained pancreata, of which 523 received solitary transplants and 70 received simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants. Kaplan-Meier function was used to estimate time to conversion by transplant type. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate patient survival, death-censored graft survival, and acute rejection-free survival while treating conversion as a time-dependent covariate. Subsequently, we examined the association between timing of conversion and the same outcomes in the conversion cohort. Results At 10 y posttransplant, 48.8% of the solitary pancreas recipients and 44.3% of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients had undergone enteric conversion. The enteric conversion was associated with 85% increased risk of acute rejection (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.37-2.49; P < 0.001). However, the conversion was not associated with graft loss or mortality. In the conversion cohort, a longer interval from engraftment to conversion was associated with an 18% lower rejection rate (HR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.708-0.960; P = 0.013) and a 22% better graft survival (HR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.646-0.946; P = 0.01). Conclusions Enteric conversion was associated with increased risk of rejection, but not increased risks of graft loss or mortality. The decision to convert should consider the increased rejection risk. A longer interval from engraftment to conversion appears favorable.
Collapse
|
27
|
Marcella-Neto R, de Sá JR, Melaragno CS, Gonzalez AM, Salzedas-Neto A, Linhares MM, Medina-Pestana JO, Rangel ÉB. Late Conversion to Sirolimus or Everolimus After Pancreas Transplant. Transplant Proc 2020; 52:1376-1379. [PMID: 32213293 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.02.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreas transplant is an effective treatment for insulin-dependent diabetic individuals with end-stage renal disease, yet immunosuppression-associated adverse events may adversely affect patient and graft survival. The aim of the study was to document whether mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) are safe and effective as a second-line drug after pancreas transplant. METHODOLOGY An observational single-center study was performed in a cohort of 490 simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant and 45 pancreas-after-kidney transplant individuals after conversion to mTORi (n = 13) owing to adverse events of either tacrolimus or mycophenolate. RESULTS mTORi conversion was performed 11.5 ± 10.1 (range, 1-28) months after pancreas transplant, mainly owing to cytomegalovirus infection and gastrointestinal intolerance. We frequently observed clinical complications after mTORi conversion, yet creatinine, eGFR, proteinuria, fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, and C-peptide remained stable throughout the study (mean follow-up 8.2 ± 5, range 1-17) years, as did the lipid profile (P > .05). However, graft loss occurred in almost 20% of patients owing to chronic alterations. LIMITATIONS The small number of patients and a single-center cohort were limitations of the study. CONCLUSIONS Late mTORi conversion is a safe and effective approach when tacrolimus or mycophenolate-mediated adverse events occur after pancreas transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rubens Marcella-Neto
- Nephrology Division, Federal University of São Paulo/Hospital do Rim e Hipertensão, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - João R de Sá
- Endocrinology Division, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Cláudio S Melaragno
- Nephrology Division, Federal University of São Paulo/Hospital do Rim e Hipertensão, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Adriano M Gonzalez
- Surgery Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Marcelo M Linhares
- Surgery Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - José O Medina-Pestana
- Nephrology Division, Federal University of São Paulo/Hospital do Rim e Hipertensão, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Érika B Rangel
- Nephrology Division, Federal University of São Paulo/Hospital do Rim e Hipertensão, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Aziz F, Jorgenson MR, Parajuli S, Zhong W, Hidalgo LG, Djamali A, Mandelbrot D, Odorico J, Sollinger H, Astor BC, Mohamed MA. Polyomavirus and cytomegalovirus infections are risk factors for grafts loss in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant. Transpl Infect Dis 2020; 22:e13272. [PMID: 32112710 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Published literature on predictors of polyomavirus (BKV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant and their impact on allograft outcomes remain sparse. We hypothesize that BKV and CMV viremia infections decrease allograft survival in SPK. Identifying modifiable predictors of BKV and CMV may help tailor immunosuppression and improve allograft survival. METHODS All SPK recipients at our institution between January 2000 and April 2016 were included (n = 757). Thirty-nine recipients had BKV only and 25 had CMV only, and infection occurred at median follow-up times of 217 and 163 days, respectively. Event density sampling was used to match recipients with BKV or CMV to up to 10 recipients without infection by age, sex, and HLA mismatch status, and these were followed for a median of 4.3 years after infection. RESULTS Older age (HR 1.49 for each decade; 95% CI: 0.95, 2.35; P = .083) and tacrolimus use (HR 20.6; 95% CI: 2.37, 179.53; P = .006) were associated with increased incidence of BKV, but not CMV, infection. Both BKV and CMV infections were associated with increased risk of allograft failure for both pancreas (BKV [HR 2.17; 95% CI 1.47, 3.208; P = .000], CMV [HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.077, 2.687; P = .023]) and kidney (BKV [HR 2.65; 95% CI 1.765, 3.984; P = .000], CMV [HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.295, 3.308; P = .002]). CONCLUSION Older age at time of transplant and tacrolimus may help predict BKV infection in SPK recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Aziz
- Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Margaret R Jorgenson
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sandesh Parajuli
- Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Weixiong Zhong
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Luis G Hidalgo
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Arjang Djamali
- Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.,Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Didier Mandelbrot
- Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jon Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Hans Sollinger
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Brad C Astor
- Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Maha A Mohamed
- Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wan J, Fang J, Li G, Xu L, Yin W, Xiong Y, Liu L, Zhang T, Wu J, Guo Y, Ma J, Chen Z. Pancreas allograft biopsies procedure in the management of pancreas transplant recipients. Gland Surg 2019; 8:794-798. [PMID: 32042688 DOI: 10.21037/gs.2019.12.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Pancreas transplantation is an effective therapy for diabetic patients, which can significantly improve the survival rate and quality of life of diabetic patients. According to the international registration of pancreas transplantation center, the global total pancreas transplantation has reached more than 80,000 cases by 2017, including pure pancreas transplantation and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK). With the development and application of a new type of immunosuppressant, with the gradual maturity of organ preservation technology and surgical technology, the pancreas transplantation has rapidly on a global scale. However, pancreas transplantation still has more problems than limit its development compared with other organ transplantation. For example, the early diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic rejection are of considerable significance to the prognosis of pancreas transplantation. Some surveillance methods of diagnosis have been used increasingly, among which the histopathological diagnosis is particularly important. The first Banff schema for the histological diagnosis of pancreas rejection has been published, which primarily dealt with the diagnosis of acute T-cell-mediated rejection (ACMR). In recent years, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been more emphasized as the primary cause of graft failure. The Banff pancreas allograft rejection grading schema was updated in 2011 by a broad-based multidisciplinary panel, presenting comprehensive guidelines for the diagnosis of AMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiao Wan
- Organ Transplant Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511447, China
| | - Jiali Fang
- Organ Transplant Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511447, China
| | - Guanghui Li
- Organ Transplant Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511447, China
| | - Lu Xu
- Organ Transplant Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511447, China
| | - Wei Yin
- Organ Transplant Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511447, China
| | - Yunyi Xiong
- Organ Transplant Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511447, China
| | - Luhao Liu
- Organ Transplant Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511447, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Organ Transplant Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511447, China
| | - Jialin Wu
- Organ Transplant Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511447, China
| | - Yuhe Guo
- Organ Transplant Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511447, China
| | - Junjie Ma
- Organ Transplant Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511447, China
| | - Zheng Chen
- Organ Transplant Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511447, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wallace DF, Bunnett J, Fryer E, Drage M, Horsfield C, Callaghan CJ. Early allograft pancreatectomy—Technical failure or acute pancreatic rejection? Clin Transplant 2019; 33:e13702. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David F Wallace
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Joanna Bunnett
- Statistics and Clinical Studies NHS Blood and Transplant Bristol UK
| | - Eve Fryer
- Department of Cellular Pathology Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford UK
| | - Martin Drage
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Catherine Horsfield
- Department of Histopathology Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Chris J Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Timofeeva OA. Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies as Biomarkers of Transplant Rejection. Clin Lab Med 2019; 39:45-60. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2018.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
32
|
Uva PD, Papadimitriou JC, Drachenberg CB, Toniolo MF, Quevedo A, Dotta AC, Chuluyan E, Casadei DH. Graft dysfunction in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPK): Results of concurrent kidney and pancreas allograft biopsies. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:466-474. [PMID: 29985562 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2018] [Revised: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants offer significant therapeutic advantages but present a diagnostic approach dilemma in the diagnosis of rejection. Because both organs are from the same donor, the kidney has been treated traditionally as the "sentinel" organ to biopsy, presumably representing the status of both allografts. Truly concurrent biopsy studies, however, are needed to confirm this hypothesis. We examined 101 concurrent biopsies from 70 patients with dysfunction in either or both organs. Results showed concurrent rejection in 23 of 57 (40%) of cases with rejection; 19 of 57 (33.5%) and 15 of 57 (26.5%) showed kidney or pancreas only rejection, respectively. The degree and type of rejection differed in the majority (13 of 23, 56.5%) of cases with concurrent rejection, with the pancreas more often showing higher rejection grade. Taking into account pancreas dysfunction, a positive kidney biopsy should correctly predict pancreas rejection in 86% of the instances. However, the lack of complete concordance between the 2 organs, the discrepancies in grade and type of rejection, and the tendency for higher rejection grades in concurrent or pancreas only rejections, all support the rationale for pancreas biopsies. The latter provide additional data on the overall status of the organ, as well as information on nonrejection-related pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo D Uva
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,CEFYBO-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - John C Papadimitriou
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Cinthia B Drachenberg
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - María F Toniolo
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Alejandra Quevedo
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ana C Dotta
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Domingo H Casadei
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Nefrología-Nephrology, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ventura-Aguiar P, Ferrer J, Revuelta I, Paredes D, de Sousa-Amorim E, Rovira J, Esmatjes E, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Campistol JM, Oppenheimer F, Diekmann F, Ricart MJ. Pancreas outcomes between living and deceased kidney donor in pancreas after kidney transplantation patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018; 33:2052-2059. [DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Ventura-Aguiar
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), CRB CELLEX, Fundació Clínic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joana Ferrer
- Hepatobiliopancreatic and Liver Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), CRB CELLEX, Fundació Clínic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- REDinREN, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Paredes
- Organ Transplantation Coordination Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Erika de Sousa-Amorim
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Rovira
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), CRB CELLEX, Fundació Clínic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enric Esmatjes
- Diabetes Unit, Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Josep M Campistol
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), CRB CELLEX, Fundació Clínic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- REDinREN, Madrid, Spain
| | - Federico Oppenheimer
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), CRB CELLEX, Fundació Clínic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- REDinREN, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria José Ricart
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- REDinREN, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Loupy
- From the Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, Unité Mixte de Recherche S970 (A.L., C.L.), the Kidney Transplant Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (A.L.), and the Kidney Transplant Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP (C.L.) - all in Paris
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- From the Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, Unité Mixte de Recherche S970 (A.L., C.L.), the Kidney Transplant Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (A.L.), and the Kidney Transplant Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP (C.L.) - all in Paris
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Knight RJ, Graviss EA, Nguyen DT, Kuten SA, Patel SJ, Gaber L, Gaber AO. Conversion from tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil to tacrolimus-mTOR immunosuppression after kidney-pancreas transplantation reduces the incidence of both BK and CMV viremia. Clin Transplant 2018; 32:e13265. [PMID: 29676018 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to determine whether conversion from tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (TAC-MMF) into tacrolimus/mTOR inhibitor (TAC-mTOR) immunosuppression would reduce the incidences of BK and CMV viremia after kidney/pancreas (KP) transplantation. METHODS In this single-center review, the TAC-mTOR cohort (n = 39) was converted at 1 month post-transplant to an mTOR inhibitor and reduced-dose tacrolimus. Outcomes were compared to a cohort of KP recipients (n = 40) maintained on TAC-MMF. RESULTS At 3 years post-transplant, KP survivals and incidences of kidney/pancreas rejection were equivalent between mTOR and MMF-treated cohorts. (P = ns). BK viremia-free survival was better for the mTOR vs MMF-treated group (P = .004). In multivariate analysis, MMF vs mTOR immunosuppression was an independent risk factor for BK viremia (hazard ratio 12.27, P = .02). Similarly, mTOR-treated recipients displayed better CMV infection-free survival compared to the MMF-treated cohort (P = .01). MMF vs mTOR immunosuppression (hazard ratio 18.77, P = .001) and older recipient age (hazard ratio 1.13 per year, P = .006) were independent risk factors for CMV viremia. Mean estimated GFR and HgbA1c levels were equivalent between groups at 1, 2, and 3 years post-transplantation. CONCLUSION Conversion from TAC/MMF into TAC/mTOR immunosuppression after KP transplantation reduced the incidences of BK and CMV viremia with an equivalent risk of acute rejection and similar renal/pancreas function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Knight
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Edward A Graviss
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Duc T Nguyen
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Samantha A Kuten
- Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Samir J Patel
- Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lillian Gaber
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - A Osama Gaber
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
[Transplantation strategy in type 1 diabetic patients]. Nephrol Ther 2018; 14 Suppl 1:S23-S30. [PMID: 29606260 DOI: 10.1016/j.nephro.2018.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 02/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Beta cell replacement by pancreas or Langerhans islets transplantation is the only way to restore glucose homeostasis in type 1 diabetic patients. The counterpart is the need for long-term immunosuppression. These transplantations are therefore mainly indicated for patients candidates for kidney transplantation and for patients with poor quality of life due to unstable diabetes with life-threatening hypoglycemic events. Both beta cell replacement techniques have different benefits and risks and should be adapted to each type 1 diabetic patient. The transplant strategy must be personalized according to parameters assessed in the pre-transplant period, validated by a multidisciplinary team and reassessed regularly until transplantation.
Collapse
|
37
|
Cross AR, Glotz D, Mooney N. The Role of the Endothelium during Antibody-Mediated Rejection: From Victim to Accomplice. Front Immunol 2018; 9:106. [PMID: 29434607 PMCID: PMC5796908 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 01/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of solid organ transplants is characterized by the activation and injury of the allograft endothelium. Histological and transcriptomic studies have associated microvascular inflammation and endothelial lesions with the severity of rejection and poor graft outcomes. The allograft endothelium forms the physical barrier between the donor organ and the recipient; this position directly exposes the endothelium to alloimmune responses. However, endothelial cells are not just victims and can actively participate in the pathogenesis of rejection. In healthy tissues, the endothelium plays a major role in vascular and immune homeostasis. Organ transplantation, however, subjects the endothelium to an environment of inflammation, alloreactive lymphocytes, donor-specific antibodies, and potentially complement activation. As a result, endothelial cells become activated and have modified interactions with the cellular effectors of allograft damage: lymphocytes, natural killer, and myeloid cells. Activated endothelial cells participate in leukocyte adhesion and recruitment, lymphocyte activation and differentiation, as well as the secretion of cytokines and chemokines. Ultimately, highly activated endothelial cells promote pro-inflammatory alloresponses and become accomplices to AMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Rachael Cross
- INSERM U1160, Paris, France.,University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Denis Glotz
- INSERM U1160, Paris, France.,University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.,AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Louis, Département de Néphrologie, Paris, France.,LabEx Transplantex, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Nuala Mooney
- INSERM U1160, Paris, France.,University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.,LabEx Transplantex, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Antibody mediated rejection due to de-novo DSA causing venous thrombosis of pancreas allograft - A case report. Transpl Immunol 2018; 47:22-25. [PMID: 29317301 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2018.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2017] [Revised: 01/03/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
This case describes a 34year old female who underwent an HLA identical living donor kidney transplant with a positive flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM), but without any donor specific antibody (DSA). Tests to detect non-HLA antibody and autoantibody were negative. Allograft functioned well without rejection. She later received a pancreas allograft, again with a weakly positive FCXM, without DSA. After good initial graft function, she developed hyperglycemia six weeks posttransplant. Cross-sectional imaging demonstrated non-enhancing pancreas allograft with new vein thrombosis. She underwent transplant pancreatectomy, the explant pathology demonstrated changes consistent with severe acute antibody mediated rejection (AMR) causing thrombosis of the pancreas allograft. She had also developed several de-novo class-I DSAs at this time. Despite extensive testing, we could not identify a causative antibody for the initial positive FCXMs or its role in the eventual rejection of the pancreas allograft.
Collapse
|
39
|
Lindahl JP, Horneland R, Nordheim E, Hartmann A, Aandahl EM, Grzyb K, Haugaa H, Kjøsen G, Åsberg A, Jenssen T. Outcomes in Pancreas Transplantation With Exocrine Drainage Through a Duodenoduodenostomy Versus Duodenojejunostomy. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:154-162. [PMID: 28696022 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2017] [Revised: 07/02/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Until recently, pancreas transplantation has mostly been performed with exocrine drainage via duodenojejunostomy (DJ). Since 2012, DJ was substituted with duodenoduodenostomy (DD) in our hospital, allowing endoscopic access for biopsies. This study assessed safety profiles with DD versus DJ procedures and clinical outcomes with the DD technique in pancreas transplantation. DD patients (n = 117; 62 simultaneous pancreas-kidney [SPKDD ] and 55 pancreas transplantation alone [PTADD ] with median follow-up 2.2 years) were compared with DJ patients (n = 179; 167 SPKDJ and 12 PTADJ ) transplanted in the period 1998-2012 (pre-DD era). Postoperative bleeding and pancreas graft vein thrombosis requiring relaparotomy occurred in 17% and 9% of DD patients versus 10% (p = 0.077) and 6% (p = 0.21) in DJ patients, respectively. Pancreas graft rejection rates were still higher in PTADD patients versus SPKDD patients (p = 0.003). Hazard ratio (HR) for graft loss was 2.25 (95% CI 1.00, 5.05; p = 0.049) in PTADD versus SPKDD recipients. In conclusion, compared with the DJ procedure, the DD procedure did not reduce postoperative surgical complications requiring relaparatomy or improve clinical outcomes after pancreas transplantation despite serial pancreatic biopsies for rejection surveillance. It remains to be seen whether better rejection monitoring in DD patients translates into improved long-term pancreas graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Lindahl
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - R Horneland
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - E Nordheim
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - A Hartmann
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - E M Aandahl
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Center for Molecular Medicine Norway (NCMM), Nordic EMBL Partnership, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - K Grzyb
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - H Haugaa
- Department of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway
| | - G Kjøsen
- Department of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - A Åsberg
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,The Norwegian Renal Registry, Oslo, Norway
| | - T Jenssen
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Metabolic and Renal Research Group, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Development of CD3 cell quantitation algorithms for renal allograft biopsy rejection assessment utilizing open source image analysis software. Virchows Arch 2017; 472:259-269. [DOI: 10.1007/s00428-017-2260-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Revised: 09/29/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
41
|
Complement-Mediated Enhancement of Monocyte Adhesion to Endothelial Cells by HLA Antibodies, and Blockade by a Specific Inhibitor of the Classical Complement Cascade, TNT003. Transplantation 2017. [PMID: 28640789 PMCID: PMC5482566 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Background Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of most solid organs is characterized by evidence of complement activation and/or intragraft macrophages (C4d + and CD68+ biopsies). We previously demonstrated that crosslinking of HLA I by antibodies triggered endothelial activation and monocyte adhesion. We hypothesized that activation of the classical complement pathway at the endothelial cell surface by HLA antibodies would enhance monocyte adhesion through soluble split product generation, in parallel with direct endothelial activation downstream of HLA signaling. Methods Primary human aortic endothelial cells (HAEC) were stimulated with HLA class I antibodies in the presence of intact human serum complement. C3a and C5a generation, endothelial P-selectin expression, and adhesion of human primary and immortalized monocytes (Mono Mac 6) were measured. Alternatively, HAEC or monocytes were directly stimulated with purified C3a or C5a. Classical complement activation was inhibited by pretreatment of complement with an anti-C1s antibody (TNT003). Results Treatment of HAEC with HLA antibody and human complement increased the formation of C3a and C5a. Monocyte recruitment by human HLA antibodies was enhanced in the presence of intact human serum complement or purified C3a or C5a. Specific inhibition of the classical complement pathway using TNT003 or C1q-depleted serum significantly reduced adhesion of monocytes in the presence of human complement. Conclusions Despite persistent endothelial viability in the presence of HLA antibodies and complement, upstream complement anaphylatoxin production exacerbates endothelial exocytosis and leukocyte recruitment. Upstream inhibition of classical complement may be therapeutic to dampen mononuclear cell recruitment and endothelial activation characteristic of microvascular inflammation during AMR. Valenzuela et al show that HLA antibody binding to human endothelial cells in vitro, triggered complement C3a and C5a deposition that mediated monocyte recruitment, and the salutary effects of inhibiting the classical complement pathway with an anti-C1s antibody. Supplemental digital content is available in the text.
Collapse
|
42
|
Virtual HLA Crossmatching as a Means to Safely Expedite Transplantation of Imported Pancreata. Transplantation 2017; 100:1103-10. [PMID: 26950720 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Imported pancreata accumulate cold ischemia time (CIT), limiting utilization and worsening outcomes. Flow cytometric crossmatching (FXM) is a standard method to assess recipient and donor compatibility, but can prolong CIT. Single-antigen bead assays allow for detection of recipient donor-specific HLA antibodies, enabling prediction of compatibility through a "virtual crossmatch" (VXM). This study investigates the utility and outcomes of VXM after transplantation of imported pancreata. METHODS We retrospectively compared outcomes of 153 patients undergoing pancreas transplantation at our institution over a 3.5-year period. RESULTS Three patient groups were analyzed based on geographic source of the pancreas graft and the type of prospective crossmatch performed: (1) imported VXM-only, n = 39; (2) imported VXM + FXM, n = 12; and (3) local VXM + FXM, n = 102. There were no episodes of hyperacute rejection and 1 episode of early antibody-mediated rejection (<90 days) in the imported VXM group. Death-censored graft survival, patient survival, and rejection rates were comparable among the recipient groups. For pancreata imported from United Network of Organ Sharing regions 3 and 4, proceeding to surgery without an FXM reduced CIT by 5.1 hours (P < 0.001). The time from organ arrival at the hospital to operation start was significantly shorter in the VXM-only group compared with the VXM + FXM group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Virtual crossmatch helps minimize CIT without increasing rejection or adversely affecting graft survival, making it a viable method to increase pancreas graft utilization across distant organ sharing regions.
Collapse
|
43
|
Valenzuela NM, Reed EF. Antibody-mediated rejection across solid organ transplants: manifestations, mechanisms, and therapies. J Clin Invest 2017; 127:2492-2504. [PMID: 28604384 DOI: 10.1172/jci90597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Solid organ transplantation is a curative therapy for hundreds of thousands of patients with end-stage organ failure. However, long-term outcomes have not improved, and nearly half of transplant recipients will lose their allografts by 10 years after transplant. One of the major challenges facing clinical transplantation is antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) caused by anti-donor HLA antibodies. AMR is highly associated with graft loss, but unfortunately there are few efficacious therapies to prevent and reverse AMR. This Review describes the clinical and histological manifestations of AMR, and discusses the immunopathological mechanisms contributing to antibody-mediated allograft injury as well as current and emerging therapies.
Collapse
|
44
|
Not All Antibodies Are Created Equal: Factors That Influence Antibody Mediated Rejection. J Immunol Res 2017; 2017:7903471. [PMID: 28373996 PMCID: PMC5360970 DOI: 10.1155/2017/7903471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2016] [Revised: 02/17/2017] [Accepted: 02/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Consistent with Dr. Paul Terasaki's "humoral theory of rejection" numerous studies have shown that HLA antibodies can cause acute and chronic antibody mediated rejection (AMR) and decreased graft survival. New evidence also supports a role for antibodies to non-HLA antigens in AMR and allograft injury. Despite the remarkable efforts by leaders in the field who pioneered single antigen bead technology for detection of donor specific antibodies, a considerable amount of work is still needed to better define the antibody attributes that are associated with AMR pathology. This review highlights what is currently known about the clinical context of pre and posttransplant antibodies, antibody characteristics that influence AMR, and the paths after donor specific antibody production (no rejection, subclinical rejection, and clinical dysfunction with AMR).
Collapse
|
45
|
Loupy A, Haas M, Solez K, Racusen L, Glotz D, Seron D, Nankivell BJ, Colvin RB, Afrouzian M, Akalin E, Alachkar N, Bagnasco S, Becker JU, Cornell L, Drachenberg C, Dragun D, de Kort H, Gibson IW, Kraus ES, Lefaucheur C, Legendre C, Liapis H, Muthukumar T, Nickeleit V, Orandi B, Park W, Rabant M, Randhawa P, Reed EF, Roufosse C, Seshan SV, Sis B, Singh HK, Schinstock C, Tambur A, Zeevi A, Mengel M. The Banff 2015 Kidney Meeting Report: Current Challenges in Rejection Classification and Prospects for Adopting Molecular Pathology. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:28-41. [PMID: 27862883 PMCID: PMC5363228 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 486] [Impact Index Per Article: 69.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2016] [Revised: 10/25/2016] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The XIII Banff meeting, held in conjunction the Canadian Society of Transplantation in Vancouver, Canada, reviewed the clinical impact of updates of C4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) from the 2013 meeting, reports from active Banff Working Groups, the relationships of donor-specific antibody tests (anti-HLA and non-HLA) with transplant histopathology, and questions of molecular transplant diagnostics. The use of transcriptome gene sets, their resultant diagnostic classifiers, or common key genes to supplement the diagnosis and classification of rejection requires further consensus agreement and validation in biopsies. Newly introduced concepts include the i-IFTA score, comprising inflammation within areas of fibrosis and atrophy and acceptance of transplant arteriolopathy within the descriptions of chronic active T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) or chronic ABMR. The pattern of mixed TCMR and ABMR was increasingly recognized. This report also includes improved definitions of TCMR and ABMR in pancreas transplants with specification of vascular lesions and prospects for defining a vascularized composite allograft rejection classification. The goal of the Banff process is ongoing integration of advances in histologic, serologic, and molecular diagnostic techniques to produce a consensus-based reporting system that offers precise composite scores, accurate routine diagnostics, and applicability to next-generation clinical trials.
Collapse
|
46
|
Valenzuela NM, Hickey MJ, Reed EF. Antibody Subclass Repertoire and Graft Outcome Following Solid Organ Transplantation. Front Immunol 2016; 7:433. [PMID: 27822209 PMCID: PMC5075576 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2016] [Accepted: 10/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Long-term outcomes in solid organ transplantation are constrained by the development of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and other targets, which elicit antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). However, antibody-mediated graft injury represents a broad continuum, from extensive complement activation and tissue damage compromising the function of the transplanted organ, to histological manifestations of endothelial cell injury and mononuclear cell infiltration but without concurrent allograft dysfunction. In addition, while transplant recipients with DSA as a whole fare worse than those without, a substantial minority of patients with DSA do not experience poorer graft outcome. Taken together, these observations suggest that not all DSA are equally pathogenic. Antibody effector functions are controlled by a number of factors, including antibody concentration, antigen availability, and antibody isotype/subclass. Antibody isotype is specified by many integrated signals, including the antigen itself as well as from antigen-presenting cells or helper T cells. To date, a number of studies have described the repertoire of IgG subclasses directed against HLA in pretransplant patients and evaluated the clinical impact of different DSA IgG subclasses on allograft outcome. This review will summarize what is known about the repertoire of antibodies to HLA and non-HLA targets in transplantation, focusing on the distribution of IgG subclasses, as well as the general biology, etiology, and mechanisms of injury of different humoral factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Valenzuela
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michelle J Hickey
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elaine F Reed
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Fernandes-Silva G, Ivani de Paula M, Rangel ÉB. mTOR inhibitors in pancreas transplant: adverse effects and drug-drug interactions. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2016; 13:367-385. [DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2017.1239708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Fernandes-Silva
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo/Hospital do Rim e Hipertensão, Nephrology Department, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Mayara Ivani de Paula
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo/Hospital do Rim e Hipertensão, Nephrology Department, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Érika B. Rangel
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo/Hospital do Rim e Hipertensão, Nephrology Department, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
A Single-center Experience on the Value of Pancreas Graft Biopsies and HLA Antibody Monitoring After Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2016; 47:2504-12. [PMID: 26518960 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2015] [Accepted: 09/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT), monitoring of the pancreas allograft is more complex than the kidney allograft due to difficulties in obtaining pancreas histology and weak clinical evidence supporting the role of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). METHODS We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of all 17 SPKT recipients who underwent a total of 22 pancreas allograft indication biopsies from October 2009 to September 2012. Fifteen patients had at least 2 DSA measurements: pretransplantation and at the time of biopsy. RESULTS All 7 patients (100%) with post-transplantation DSA-positivity (de novo: n = 6; persistent: n = 1) at biopsy had at least 1 rejection episode either of the pancreas (n = 4) or the kidney (n = 3), with 3 antibody-mediated rejections (AMR). In contrast, only 4 of 8 patients (50%) without post-transplantation DSA had evidence of rejection, with 1 AMR. Findings during pancreas allograft biopsy procedures led to a change of immunosuppressive therapy in 11 of 15 (73%) patients. Patient survival, graft survival, and function were not adversely affected by the presence of post-transplantation DSA. One major and 2 minor procedure-related complications occurred during the pancreas biopsies. CONCLUSIONS In this small retrospective analysis, pancreas allograft histology provided the most therapeutically relevant information, rather than the kidney histology or DSA monitoring.
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been identified among the most important factors limiting long-term outcome in cardiac and renal transplantation. Therapeutic management remains challenging and the development of effective treatment modalities is hampered by insufficient understanding of the underlying pathophysiology. However, recent findings indicate that in addition to AMR-triggered activation of the classical complement pathway, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity by innate immune cell subsets also promotes vascular graft injury. This review summarizes the accumulating evidence for the contribution of natural killer cells, the key mediators of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, to human AMR in allotransplantation and xenotransplantation and illustrates the current mechanistic conceptions drawn from animal models.
Collapse
|
50
|
Redfield RR, Rickels MR, Naji A, Odorico JS. Pancreas Transplantation in the Modern Era. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2016; 45:145-66. [PMID: 26895686 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2015.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The field of pancreas transplantation has evolved from an experimental procedure in the 1980s to become a routine transplant in the modern era. With short- and long-term outcomes continuing to improve and the significant mortality, quality-of-life, and end-organ disease benefits, pancreas transplantation should be offered to more patients. In this article, we review current indications, patient selection, surgical considerations, complications, and outcomes in the modern era of pancreas transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert R Redfield
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Clinical Science Cntr-H4/772, Madison, WI 53792, USA.
| | - Michael R Rickels
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 2-134 Smilow Center for Translational Research, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Ali Naji
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283, USA
| | - Jon S Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Clinical Science Cntr-H4/772, Madison, WI 53792, USA
| |
Collapse
|