Pancreas transplantation from donors after circulatory death from the United Kingdom

Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation from Donors after Circulatory Death in Switzerland

Background: Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) remains the only curative treatment for type I diabetics with end-stage kidney disease. SPK using donors after circulatory death (DCD) is one important measure to expand the organ pool for pancreas transplantation (PT). After initial doubts due to higher complications, DCD SPK is now considered safe and equivalent to donation after brain death in terms of survival and graft function. Materials and Methods: We assessed pancreas and kidney graft function, as well as complications of the first three patients who underwent a DCD SPK in Switzerland. Two transplantations were after rapid procurement, one following normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). Results: Intra- and postoperative courses were uneventful and without major complications in all patients. In the two SPK after rapid procurement, pancreas graft function was excellent, with 100% insulin-free survival, and hemoglobin A1C dropped from 7.9 and 7.5 before SPK and to 5.1 and 4.3 after three years, respectively. Kidney graft function was excellent in the first year, followed by a gradual decline due to recurrent infections. The patient, after NRP SPK, experienced short-term delayed pancreatic graft function requiring low-dose insulin treatment for 5 days post-transplant, most likely due to increased peripheral insulin resistance in obesity. During follow-up, there was persistent euglycemia and excellent kidney function. Conclusions: We report on the first series of DCD SPK ever performed in Switzerland. Results were promising, with low complication rates and sustained graft survival. With almost half of all donors in Switzerland currently being DCD, we see great potential for the expansion of DCD PT.

Association of procurement technique with organ yield and cost following donation after circulatory death

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) could account for the largest expansion of the donor allograft pool in the contemporary era. However, the organ yield and associated costs of normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) compared to super-rapid recovery (SRR) with ex-situ normothermic machine perfusion, remain unreported. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (December 2019 to June 2023) was analyzed to determine the number of organs recovered per donor. A cost analysis was performed based on our institution's experience since 2022. Of 43 502 donors, 30 646 (70%) were donors after brain death (DBD), 12 536 (29%) DCD-SRR and 320 (0.7%) DCD-NRP. The mean number of organs recovered was 3.70 for DBD, 3.71 for DCD-NRP (P < .001), and 2.45 for DCD-SRR (P < .001). Following risk adjustment, DCD-NRP (adjusted odds ratio 1.34, confidence interval 1.04-1.75) and DCD-SRR (adjusted odds ratio 2.11, confidence interval 2.01-2.21; reference: DBD) remained associated with greater odds of allograft nonuse. Including incomplete and completed procurement runs, the total average cost of DCD-NRP was $9463.22 per donor. By conservative estimates, we found that approximately 31 donor allografts could be procured using DCD-NRP for the cost equivalent of 1 allograft procured via DCD-SRR with ex-situ normothermic machine perfusion. In conclusion, DCD-SRR procurements were associated with the lowest organ yield compared to other procurement methods. To facilitate broader adoption of DCD procurement, a comprehensive understanding of the trade-offs inherent in each technique is imperative.

British Transplantation Society guidelines on abdominal organ transplantation from deceased donors after circulatory death

The British Transplantation Society (BTS) 'Guideline on transplantation from deceased donors after circulatory death' has recently been updated and this manuscript summarises the relevant recommendations in abdominal organ transplantation from Donation after Circulatory Death (DCD) donors, encompassing the chapters on liver, kidney, pancreas and islet cell transplantation.

Poor utilization of deceased donor pancreata in the United States: Time for action

The number of solid organ pancreas transplants performed in the United States has declined over the past two decades despite improving outcomes and the known benefits associated with this procedure. Although the reasons are multifactorial, high rates of deceased donor pancreata nonrecovery and nonuse have at least in part contributed to the reduction in pancreas transplant activity. The pancreas has higher nonrecovery and nonuse rates compared to the kidney and liver because of more stringent donor selection criteria, particularly with respect to donor age and body mass index, although even marginally inferior donor pancreata likely still benefit some patients compared to alternative therapies. In this editorial, we present several donor-, candidate-, and center-specific factors that are either confirmed or suspected of being associated with inferior outcomes, which contribute to high pancreas nonrecovery and nonuse rates. In addition, we have discussed several measures to increase pancreas recovery and reduce pancreas nonutilization.

Pancreas transplantation with grafts obtained from donation after cardiac death or donation after brain death results in comparable outcomes

Introduction

Pancreas organ shortages and long recipient waitlist times are critical components that limit recipients from receiving a pancreas transplant. Over the last decade, our center has been using donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors as an adjunct to donation after brain death (DBD) donors to expand the organ pool. The aim of this study was to compare recipient and graft survival between DCD and DBD recipients.

Methods

A retrospective single center propensity matched analysis (2011-2020) of 32 DCD vs 96 DBD pancreas transplants was performed.

Results

8-year recipient survival was similar between DCD and DBD groups (87.4% vs 92.7%, p=0.35) as was simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant (SPK) 8-year kidney (88.9 vs 96.9%, p=0.219) and pancreas graft survival (77.4% vs 86.7%, p=0.344). There was no difference in vascular thrombosis rate between DCD and DBD pancreas grafts (3.1% vs 7.3%, p=0.73). DCD kidneys had a higher rate of DGF vs DBD kidneys (28.1% vs 6.3%, p=0.004), without any significant difference in long term kidney failure (12.5% vs 8.3%, p=0.5).

Discussion

Recipients of DCD grafts demonstrate equivalent long-term patient and graft survival compared to DBD recipients for pancreas transplantation. Increased utilization of well selected DCD donors is a safe strategy to increase the donor pool.

Metabolic Outcomes After Pancreas Transplant Alone From Donation After Circulatory Death Donors-The UK Transplant Registry Analysis

Extrapolating data from early DCD (donation after circulatory death) kidney transplantation, pancreas transplants from DCD grafts were feared to have worse metabolic outcomes. Hence, we aimed to address the question of pancreas transplant alone (PTA) from DCD donors-are our concerns justified? A UK transplant registry analysis of 185 PTA performed between 2005 and 2018 was done. All early graft losses (<3 months) were excluded to allow focus on the metabolic outcomes (HbA₁c, weight gain and incidence of secondary diabetic macrovascular complications). The aim was to compare the metabolic outcomes, rejection rates (including the need for steroids), patient and graft survival between DBD (Donation after brainstem death) and DCD groups. After excluding early graft losses, data from 162 PTA (DBD = 114 and DCD = 48) were analyzed. Body mass index of the donor was less in DCD group (DBD = 23.40 vs. DCD = 22.25, p = 0.006) and the rest of the baseline transplant characteristics were comparable. There were no significant differences in the HbA₁c, weight gain, rejection rate, and incidence of secondary diabetic macrovascular complications post-transplant between DBD and DCD recipients. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient and graft survival were similar in both the groups. PTA from DCD donors have equivalent metabolic outcomes and survival (patient/graft) as that of DBD donors.

Whole-Organ Pancreas and Islets Transplantations in UK: An Overview and Future Directions

Whole-organ pancreas and islets transplantations are two therapeutic options to treat type 1 diabetic patients resistant to optimised medical treatment in whom severe complications develop. Selection of the best option for β-cell replacement depends on several factors such as kidney function, patient comorbidities, and treatment goals. For a patient with end-stage kidney disease, the treatment of choice is often a simultaneous transplant of the pancreas and kidney (SPK). However, it remains a major surgical procedure in patients with multiple comorbidities and therefore it is important to select those who will benefit from it. Additionally, in view of the organ shortage, new strategies to improve outcomes and reduce immune reactions have been developed, including dynamic organ perfusion technologies, pancreas bioengineering, and stem cell therapies. The purpose of this article is to review the indications, surgical techniques, outcomes, and future directions of whole-organ pancreas and islets transplantations.

Novel Organ Perfusion and Preservation Strategies in Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death in Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Kidney and pancreatic transplants from controlled donation after circulatory death donors are vulnerable to ischemia-reperfusion injuries. In this context of transplant shortage, there is a need to optimize the function of these transplants and to develop novel perfusion and preservation strategies in controlled donation after circulatory death in kidney and pancreatic transplants.

IN SITU PERFUSION AND PRESERVATION STRATEGIES

In situ regional normothermic perfusion improves the outcome of kidney transplants from controlled donation after circulatory death and provides equivalent results for the kidney from brain-dead donors. In situ regional normothermic perfusion is under investigation for pancreatic transplants.

EX SITU PERFUSION AND PRESERVATION STRATEGIES

Perfusion on hypothermic machine perfusion is highly recommended for the kidney from controlled donation after cardiac death. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion machine decreases the rate of graft rejection and graft failure in kidney transplantation. Ex situ normothermic perfusion is an easy way to assess renal function. In the future, kidney transplants could benefit from drug therapy during ex situ normothermic perfusion. In pancreas transplantation, hypothermic machine perfusion and ex situ normothermic perfusion present encouraging results in preclinical studies.

Antemortem Heparin in Organ Donation After Circulatory Death Determination: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Donation after circulatory death determination frequently involves antemortem heparin administration to mitigate peri-arrest microvascular thrombosis. We systematically reviewed the literature to: (1) describe heparin administration practices and (2) explore the effects on transplant outcomes. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies reporting donation after circulatory death determination heparin practices including use, dosage, and timing (objective 1). To explore associations between antemortem heparin and transplant outcomes (objective 2), we (1) summarized within-study comparisons and (2) used meta-regression analyses to examine associations between proportions of donors that received heparin and transplant outcomes. We assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and applied the GRADE methodology to determine certainty in the evidence. For objective 1, among 55 eligible studies, 48 reported heparin administration to at least some donors (range: 15.8%-100%) at variable doses (up to 1000 units/kg) and times relative to withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. For objective 2, 7 studies that directly compared liver transplants with and without antemortem heparin reported lower rates of primary nonfunction, hepatic artery thrombosis, graft failure at 5 y, or recipient mortality (low certainty of evidence). In contrast, meta-regression analysis of 32 liver transplant studies detected no associations between the proportion of donors that received heparin and rates of early allograft dysfunction, primary nonfunction, hepatic artery thrombosis, biliary ischemia, graft failure, retransplantation, or patient survival (very low certainty of evidence). In conclusion, antemortem heparin practices vary substantially with an uncertain effect on transplant outcomes. Given the controversies surrounding antemortem heparin, clinical trials may be warranted.

The Future Direction of the Organ Donation System After Legislation of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision Act

Background

The transplant community is seeking ways to encourage organ donation after cardiac arrest to solve the problem of the insufficiency of organs available for the increasing number of people awaiting transplantation. This study aimed to determine whether the life-sustaining treatment (LST) decision system, implemented in Korea on February 4, 2018, can address the shortage of organ donations.

Material/Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of the 442 patients who had filled out forms for the LST decision at Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital from April 2018 to December 2019, and classified the eligibility of organ and tissue donation according to the Korean Organ Donation Agency criteria.

Results

We included 442 patients in this study. Among them, 238 (53.8%) were men, and 204 (46.2%) were women. The average age of the patients was 71.8 years (the youngest and oldest were aged 23 years and 103 years, respectively). Of these, 110 patients (24.9%) decided on their own to discontinue LST, whereas 332 (75.1%) decided to discontinue with their family’s consent. This study demonstrated that 50% of patients who were not brain-dead and discontinued LST were eligible for organ donation. However, the patients and caregivers were not aware of this option because the current law does not allow the discussion of such donations.

Conclusions

A discussion regarding donation after circulatory death is recommended to solve the problem of insufficient organ donation.

Outcomes after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation from donation after circulatory death donors: A UK registry analysis

There are concerns that simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplants from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors have a higher risk of graft failure than those from donation after brain death (DBD) donors. A UK registry analysis of SPK transplants between 2005 and 2018 was performed. Pancreas survivals of those receiving organs from DCD or DBD donors were compared. Multivariable analyses were used to adjust for baseline differences between the two groups and to identify factors associated with pancreas graft loss. A total of 2228 SPK transplants were implanted; 403 (18.1%) were from DCD donors. DCD donors were generally younger, slimmer, less likely to have stroke as a cause of death, with lower terminal creatinines and shorter pancreas cold ischemic times than DBD donors. Median (IQR) follow-up was 4.2 (1.6-8.1) years. On univariable analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in 5-year death-censored pancreas graft survival between the two donor types (79.5% versus 80.4%; p = .86). Multivariable analysis showed no statistically significant differences in 5-year pancreas graft loss between transplants from DCD (n = 343) and DBD (n = 1492) donors (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% CI 0.76-1.23; p = .12). The findings from this study support the increased use of SPK transplants from DCD donors.

Clinical use of donation after circulatory death pancreas for islet transplantation

Due to a shortage of donation after brain death (DBD) organs, donation after circulatory death (DCD) is increasingly performed. In the field of islet transplantation, there is uncertainty regarding the suitability of DCD pancreas in terms of islet yield and function after islet isolation. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential use of DCD pancreas for islet transplantation. Islet isolation procedures from 126 category 3 DCD and 258 DBD pancreas were performed in a 9-year period. Islet yield after isolation was significantly lower for DCD compared to DBD pancreas (395 515 islet equivalents [IEQ] and 480 017 IEQ, respectively; p = .003). The decrease in IEQ during 2 days of culture was not different between the two groups. Warm ischemia time was not related to DCD islet yield. In vitro insulin secretion after a glucose challenge was similar between DCD and DBD islets. After islet transplantation, DCD islet graft recipients had similar graft function (AUC C-peptide) during mixed meal tolerance tests and Igls score compared to DBD graft recipients. In conclusion, DCD islets can be considered for clinical islet transplantation.

Outcomes From Brain Death Donors With Previous Cardiac Arrest Accepted for Pancreas Transplantation: A Single-center Retrospective Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of cardiac arrest time (CAT) in donors after brain death (DBD) donors on pancreas transplant outcome.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Results from donors after circulatory death report good outcomes despite warm ischemia times up to 57 minutes. Previous cardiac arrest in DBD has been addressed as a potential risk factor, but duration of the CAT has never been evaluated.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis including 342 pancreas transplants performed at our center from 2000 to 2016, and evaluated the effect of previous cardiac arrest in DBD (caDBD) on pancreas transplant outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 49 (14.3%) caDBD were accepted for transplantation [median CAT of 5.0 min (IQR 2.5-15.0)]. Anoxic encephalopathy was most frequent and P-PASS higher (16.9 vs 15.6) in caDBD group when compared with other DBD. No differences were found in all other characteristics evaluated.Graft survival was similar between both groups, as was the incidence of early graft failure (EGF). CAT increased the risk for EGF [OR 1.09 (95% CI, 1.01-1.17)], and the duration of CPR discriminated for EGF [AUC of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74-0.98)], with a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 75% at a cutoff of 15 minutes. When evaluated separately, caDBD >15 min increased over 5 times the risk for EGF [HR 5.80 (95% CI, 1.82-18.56); P = 0.003], and these presented fewer days on the ICU (1.0 vs 3.0 d).

CONCLUSION

CaDBD donors are suitable for routine pancreas transplantation without increasing EGF risk, and in those with longer CAT it may be prudent to postpone donation a few days to allow a thorough evaluation of organ damage following cardiac arrest.

Outcomes for circulatory death and brainstem death pancreas transplantation with or without use of normothermic regional perfusion

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation is the optimum treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes and renal failure, providing survival benefit over deceased donor kidney transplant alone. Here the authors demonstrate that utilization of donation after circulatory death pancreases is a safe approach to expanding the donor pool with equivalent results to donation after brainstem death transplantation. They also demonstrate that pancreas transplantation after normothermic regional perfusion is feasible, but it will require ongoing prospective study to ensure that the benefits seen for liver transplantation do not come at the expense of pancreas transplant outcomes.

Pancreas utilization rates in the UK - an 11-year analysis

Utilization of pancreases for transplantation remains inferior to that of other organs. Herein, we analysed UK pancreas discards to identify the reasons for the low utilization rates. Data on all pancreases offered first for solid organ transplantation between 1st January 2005 and 31st December 2015 were extracted from the UK Transplant Registry. The number of organs discarded, reasons and the time point of discard were analysed. A centre specific comparison was also undertaken. 7367 pancreases were offered first for solid organ transplantation. 35% were donors after circulatory death (DCD). 3668 (49.7%) organs were not retrieved. Of the 3699 pancreases retrieved, 38% were initially accepted but subsequently discarded. 2145 (29%) grafts offered were transplanted as simultaneous pancreas-kidney or solitary pancreas. 1177 (55%) were transplanted on the first offer whilst the remaining 968 were transplanted after a median of three offers. 52% DBD pancreases were accepted and transplanted on the first offer compared with 68% DCD grafts. There were significant differences in discard rates between centres (30-80% for DBD and 3-78% for DCD, P < 0.001). A significant number of solid pancreases are discarded. Better graft assessment at retrieval could minimize unnecessary organ travel and discards. Closer links with islet programmes may allow for better utilization of discarded grafts.

Pancreas preservation: clinical practice and future developments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize recently published studies of preservation strategies including machine perfusion in pancreas transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The shortage of conventional donors is leading units to use extended criteria donors (ECDs) and donors after cardiac death (DCD). Static cold storage (SCS) is still the standard method of preservation for pancreases and University of Wisconsin remains the gold standard preservation solution. In experimental studies, oxygen delivered during preservation reduced tissue injury and improved islet cell yield and function. Hypothermic machine perfusion of discarded human pancreases has been shown to improve adenosine triphosphate levels without adversely effect histology and oedema compared with SCS. Normothermic machine perfusion of discarded human organs has so far been challenging and led to increasing injury, rather than preservation. There are currently no clinical studies in pancreas transplant with the exception of a small number of pancreases being transplanted following normothermic regional perfusion.

SUMMARY

The storm of new organ preservation methods is now being more widely studied in the pancreas, with some promising results. These new strategies have the potential to allow expansion of the donor pool and greater utilization of ECD and DCD organs.

Successful Expectant Management of Nonocclusive Thrombosis in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation can be complicated by thrombosis in the early post-transplant period.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective study examining risk factors, management, and outcomes of modern era SPK transplants. We reviewed 235 recipients over 10 years (January 1, 2008, to September 1, 2017). We used multivariate analysis to examine donor, recipient, and operative risk factors for thrombosis.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients (17%) had a thrombosis diagnosed on postoperative imaging, but 61% of these patients (n = 25/41) did not lose their graft secondary to the thrombosis. Nine patients (22%) were managed with watchful waiting and serial imaging, 12 (29%) were managed with therapeutic anticoagulation, and 4 (10%) required laparotomy and graft thrombectomy. Sixteen of 235 pancreas grafts (6.8%) required pancreatectomy, and 10 of these cases occurred in the first half of the study, before 2012. The risk of thrombosis leading to graft loss increased 11.2-fold in recipients with a body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) > 25 compared with others (odds ratio, 11.2; 95% CI, 1.1-116.7; P = .043).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of SPK transplants (61%) complicated by thrombosis of the pancreatic graft were salvaged by use of imaging, anticoagulation, and in select cases, laparotomy and graft thrombectomy.

Complications during multiorgan retrieval and pancreas preservation

In pancreas transplantation, complications can arise at each step of the process, from the initial selection of donors and recipients through the surgical technique itself and the post-operative period, when lifelong immunosuppression is required. In the early steps, careful retrieval and preservation of the pancreas are crucial for the viability of the organ and ultimate success of the transplant. The pancreas is a low-flow gland, making it highly sensitive to transplantation conditions and presenting risk of pancreatitis due to periods of ischemia. The two groups of donors - after brain death (DBD) or after cardiac arrest (DCD) - require different strategies of retrieval and preservation to avoid or reduce the risk of complications developing during and after the transplantation. For DBD donor transplantation, multiorgan retrieval and cold preservation is the conventional technique. Asystole donor (DCD) transplantation, in contrast, can benefit from the newest technologies, such as hypothermic and especially normothermic preservation machines (referred to as NECMO), to optimize organ preservation. The latter has led to an increase in the pool of donors by facilitating recuperation of organs for transplantation that would have been discarded otherwise.

Development and validation of a quantitative electron microscopy score to assess acute cellular stress in the human exocrine pancreas

The pancreas is particularly sensitive to acute cellular stress, but this has been difficult to evaluate using light microscopy. Pancreatic ischaemia associated with deceased organ donation negatively impacts whole‐organ and isolated‐islet transplantation outcomes. Post‐mortem changes have also hampered accurate interpretation of ante‐mortem pancreatic pathology. A rigorous histological scoring system accurately quantifying ischaemia is required to experimentally evaluate innovations in organ preservation and to increase rigour in clinical/research evaluation of underlying pancreatic pathology. We developed and validated an unbiased electron microscopy (EM) score of acute pancreatic exocrine cellular stress in deceased organ donor cohorts (development [n = 28] and validation [n = 16]). Standardised assessment led to clearly described numerical scores (0–3) for nuclear, mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) morphology and intracellular vacuolisation; with a maximum (worst) aggregate total score of 12. In the Validation cohort, a trend towards higher scores was observed for tail versus head regions (nucleus score following donation after brainstem death [DBD]: head 0.67 ± 0.19; tail 0.86 ± 0.11; p = 0.027) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) versus DBD (mitochondrial score: DCD (head + tail) 2.59 ± 0.16; DBD (head + tail) 2.38 ± 0.21; p = 0.004). Significant mitochondrial changes were seen ubiquitously even with short cold ischaemia, whereas nuclear and vacuolisation changes remained mild even after prolonged ischaemia. ER score correlated with cold ischaemia time (CIT) following DBD (pancreatic tail region: r = 0.796; p = 0.018). No relationships between CIT and EM scores were observed following DCD. In conclusion, we have developed and validated a novel EM score providing standardised quantitative assessment of subcellular ultrastructural morphology in pancreatic acinar cells. This provides a robust novel tool for gold standard measurement of acute cellular stress in studies evaluating surrogate measures of peri‐transplant ischaemia, organ preservation technologies and in samples obtained for detailed pathological examination of underlying pancreatic pathology.

Delayed kidney graft function in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients is associated with early pancreas allograft failure

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication associated with significant untoward effects in kidney-alone transplantation. The incidence and outcomes following kidney delayed graft function (K-DGF) among patients undergoing simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation are less certain. We analyzed SPK recipients transplanted at our center between January 1994 and December 2017. A total of 632 recipients fulfilled the selection criteria, including 69 (11%) with K-DGF and 563 without. The incidence of K-DGF was significantly higher in recipients of organs from older donors and donation after circulatory death (DCD). The presence of K-DGF was significantly associated with an increased risk of pancreas graft failure during the first 90 days (n = 9, incidence rate [IR] 2.45/100 person-months), but not with late pancreas failure (n = 32, IR 0.84/100 person-months), kidney graft failure, or patient death. Although DCD was associated with K-DGF, it was not associated with either pancreas (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.58-1.44, P = .69) or kidney (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.66-1.82, P = .74) graft failure after adjustment for potential confounders. We found K-DGF to be a significant risk factor for pancreas graft failure but not kidney graft failure, with the major risk period being early (<90 days) posttransplant, and the major donor risk factor being older donor age.

Transplant strategies for type 1 diabetes: whole pancreas, islet and porcine beta cell therapies

Whole-organ pancreas and islet transplantations are performed in a highly selected group of patients with diabetes mellitus, primarily those with type 1 diabetes mellitus, complicated by recurrent severe hypoglycaemia or renal failure requiring kidney transplantation. Clinical accessibility to pancreases or islets, and patient characteristics and therapeutic goals, may dictate choice of procedure. Pancreas transplantation is most often performed simultaneous with a kidney transplant, but patients with particularly labile type 1 diabetes may be considered for a pancreas transplant alone. While highly successful at restoring insulin independence, pancreas transplants carry the significant risks of major surgery and immunosuppression. Islet transplantation is a relatively minor procedure, usually performed for labile type 1 diabetes with severe hypoglycaemia. It is highly successful at resolving hypoglycaemia, but more than one pancreas donor may be required for insulin independence. Both pancreas and islet transplantation are limited in applicability by a paucity of deceased donors. Pigs provide one promising replenishable source of islets. Porcine islets can successfully reverse diabetes mellitus in non-human primates under the appropriate immunosuppressive conditions, with promise for eventually translating this success to a larger population of patients with diabetes mellitus in the future. Graphical abstract.

Anticoagulation in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation - On what basis?

BACKGROUND

Despite technical refinements, early pancreas graft loss due to thrombosis continues to occur. Conventional coagulation tests (CCT) do not detect hypercoagulability and hence the hypercoagulable state due to diabetes is left untreated. Thromboelastogram (TEG) is an in-vitro diagnostic test which is used in liver transplantation, and in various intensive care settings to guide anticoagulation. TEG is better than CCT because it is dynamic and provides a global hemostatic profile including fibrinolysis.

AIM

To compare the outcomes between TEG and CCT (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time and international normalized ratio) directed anticoagulation in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant recipients.

METHODS

A single center retrospective analysis comparing the outcomes between TEG and CCT-directed anticoagulation in SPK recipients, who were matched for donor age and graft type (donors after brainstem death and donors after circulatory death). Anticoagulation consisted of intravenous (IV) heparin titrated up to a maximum of 500 IU/h based on CCT in conjunction with various clinical parameters or directed by TEG results. Graft loss due to thrombosis, anticoagulation related bleeding, radiological incidence of partial thrombi in the pancreas graft, thrombus resolution rate after anticoagulation dose escalation, length of the hospital stays and, 1-year pancreas and kidney graft survival between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients who received TEG-directed anticoagulation were compared against 51 contemporaneous SPK recipients (ratio of 1: 3) who were anticoagulated based on CCT. No graft losses occurred in the TEG group, whereas 11 grafts (7 pancreases and 4 kidneys) were lost due to thrombosis in the CCT group (P = 0.06, Fisher’s exact test). The overall incidence of anticoagulation related bleeding (hematoma/ gastrointestinal bleeding/ hematuria/ nose bleeding/ re-exploration for bleeding/ post-operative blood transfusion) was 17.65% in the TEG group and 45.10% in the CCT group (P = 0.05, Fisher’s exact test). The incidence of radiologically confirmed partial thrombus in pancreas allograft was 41.18% in the TEG and 25.50% in the CCT group (P = 0.23, Fisher’s exact test). All recipients with partial thrombi detected in computed tomography (CT) scan had an anticoagulation dose escalation. The thrombus resolution rates in subsequent scan were 85.71% and 63.64% in the TEG group vs the CCT group (P = 0.59, Fisher’s exact test). The TEG group had reduced blood product usage {10 packed red blood cell (PRBC) and 2 fresh frozen plasma (FFP)} compared to the CCT group (71 PRBC/ 10 FFP/ 2 cryoprecipitate and 2 platelets). The proportion of patients requiring transfusion in the TEG group was 17.65% vs 39.25% in the CCT group (P = 0.14, Fisher’s exact test). The median length of hospital stay was 18 days in the TEG group vs 31 days in the CCT group (P = 0.03, Mann Whitney test). The 1-year pancreas graft survival was 100% in the TEG group vs 82.35% in the CCT group (P = 0.07, log rank test) and, the 1-year kidney graft survival was 100% in the TEG group vs 92.15% in the CCT group (P = 0.23, log tank test).

CONCLUSION

TEG is a promising tool in guiding judicious use of anticoagulation with concomitant prevention of graft loss due to thrombosis, and reduces the length of hospital stay.

Reasons for Low Utilization of Pancreas for Transplantation From Deceased Donors: Analysis of Data From a Single Center in India

OBJECTIVES

Although pancreas transplants were started at our center in 2014, the number of pancreases procured have remained low. This report presents an audit of donors over the past 18 months with the aim to identify factors preventing pancreas utilization.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. All deceased donors from January 2018 to July 2019 were included in this study. The medical records of deceased donors were reviewed with regard to donor characteristics such as demographics, biochemical parameters, and preterminal management.

RESULTS

Organs were retrieved from 49 deceased donors over the duration of the study. Mean age of the donors was 35.34 ± 18.2 years (11 months to 72 years). Most donors were men (M:F 41:8). In total, 45/49 (92%) donors had central nervous system trauma as a cause of brain death. Out of 49, multiple abdominal organs were retrieved from 21 donors (42.8%), whereas kidneys alone were retrieved from the rest. Pancreases were retrieved from 8 donors (16.3%). Pancreases were rejected in 21 donors (42.8%) because of age limit criteria. Other reasons for refusal included donor sepsis (n = 12, 24.5%), severe hemodynamic instability (n = 5, 10.2%), donation after cardiac death (DCD) (n = 2, 4.1%), and ischemic hepatitis (n = 7, 14.3%) while 3 (6.1%) donations happened while awaiting license renewal. A suitable recipient was not available for 1 donor (2.0%).

CONCLUSION

Pancreas retrieval rates remain low because of donor-related factors. Expansion of age limits and better donor management could improve pancreas transplant activity.

Risk analysis of extended pancreas donor selection criteria

INTRODUCTION

The success of pancreas transplantation, in combination with a stable number of available allografts has resulted in an increasing waiting list. This study investigated donor potential by expanding age and Body Mass Index (BMI) criteria.

METHODS

All reported donors in the Netherlands between 2013 and 2017 were analysed. Risk assessment of extended criteria donors was done by in-depth analysis of donor reports and calculation of the Pancreas Donor Risk Index (PDRI). The PDRI of these extended criteria donors was compared to standard criteria donors to evaluate the increased risk on graft failure.

RESULTS

A total of 1273 donors were reported. Of these donors, 405 donors were reported as pancreas donor, of which 93 (23%) pancreata were transplanted. Extending age criterion with 5 years could result in additional 40 Donation after Brain Death donors and 37 Donation after Circulatory Death donors reported. In 24 (31%) extended age criteria donors the PDRI was below the upper limit of currently transplanted pancreata. Extending BMI criteria to 35 kg/m² could result in an additional 19 (6%) donors reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Extending BMI criteria could result in a slight increase of reported donors. Extending age criteria increased significantly the number of reported donors. In 24 (31%) of the older donors the PDRI showed a reduced risk compared to currently transplanted pancreata. This study suggest that, if other risk factors are absent, pancreata of extended age and/or BMI criteria donors should be considered for transplantation.

β Cell Replacement Therapy: The Next 10 Years

β cell replacement with either pancreas or islet transplantation has progressed immensely over the last decades with current 1- and 5-year insulin independence rates of approximately 85% and 50%, respectively. Recent advances are largely attributed to improvements in immunosuppressive regimen, donor selection, and surgical technique. However, both strategies are compromised by a scarce donor source. Xenotransplantation offers a potential solution by providing a theoretically unlimited supply of islets, but clinical application has been limited by concerns for a potent immune response against xenogeneic tissue. β cell clusters derived from embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cells represent another promising unlimited source of insulin producing cells, but clinical application is pending further advances in the function of the β cell like clusters. Exciting developments and rapid progress in all areas of β cell replacement prompted a lively debate by members of the young investigator committee of the International Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association at the 15th International Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association Congress in Melbourne and at the 26th international congress of The Transplant Society in Hong Kong. This international group of young investigators debated which modality of β cell replacement would predominate the landscape in 10 years, and their arguments are summarized here.

Pancreas Transplantation With Grafts From Donors Deceased After Circulatory Death: 5 Years Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) pancreas transplantation has been shown to be an additional way to deal with donor organ shortages. The results of 5-year DCD pancreas transplantation are presented.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center analysis (2011-2015) was performed to compare the results of donation after brain death (DBD) to DCD pancreas transplantation.

RESULTS

During the study period, 104 pancreas transplantations (83 from DBD and 21 from DCD) were performed. Median Pancreas Donor Risk Index (PDRI) was 1.47, (DBD, 1.61 vs DCD, 1.35; P = 0.144). Without the factor DCD, PDRI from DCD donors was significantly lower (DBD, 1.61 vs DCD, 0.97; P < 0.001). Donor age was the only donor-related risk factor associated with pancreas graft survival (Hazard ratio, 1.06; P = 0.037). Postoperative bleeding and kidney delayed graft function occurred more frequently in recipients from DCD (P = 0.006). However, DCD pancreata had a lower incidence of thrombosis. Kidney and pancreas graft survival were equally good in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreas transplantation from DCD donors yields comparable results to DBD donors when PDRI of DCD is relatively low. Most DCD donors are younger donors with trauma as cause of death. These DCD pancreas grafts may be a better option to cope with increasing organ shortages than exploring the limits with older (and higher PDRI) DBD donors.

Hypothermic Oxygenated Machine Perfusion of the Human Donor Pancreas

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Background

Transplantation of beta cells by pancreas or islet transplantation is the treatment of choice for a selected group of patients suffering from type 1 diabetes mellitus. Pancreata are frequently not accepted for transplantation, because of the relatively high vulnerability of these organs to ischemic injury. In this study, we evaluated the effects of hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) on the quality of human pancreas grafts.

Methods

Five pancreata derived from donation after circulatory death (DCD) and 5 from donation after brain death (DBD) donors were preserved by oxygenated HMP. Hypothermic machine perfusion was performed for 6 hours at 25 mm Hg by separate perfusion of the mesenteric superior artery and the splenic artery. Results were compared with those of 10 pancreata preserved by static cold storage.

Results

During HMP, homogeneous perfusion of the pancreas could be achieved. Adenosine 5′-triphosphate concentration increased 6,8-fold in DCD and 2,6-fold in DBD pancreata. No signs of cellular injury, edema or formation of reactive oxygen species were observed. Islets of Langerhans with good viability and in vitro function could be isolated after HMP.

Conclusions

Oxygenated HMP is a feasible and safe preservation method for the human pancreas that increases tissue viability.

Donors after circulatory death pancreas transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of organs from donors after circulatory death (DCD) has become standard practice in solid organ transplantation of most abdominal organs and has been used successfully in some centres for pancreas transplantation. Nevertheless, concerns regarding poor graft outcomes and complications remain. This review aims to discuss the current state of DCD pancreas transplantation and the associated outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

In many countries, whereas the number of donors after brainstem death (DBD) remains stable, the mean age and BMI have increased making these donors, previously considered to be low risk, now more marginal. Recent meta-analyses have confirmed previous single-centre and registry reports that graft and patient survival after DCD pancreas transplantation are comparable with outcomes using pancreases from DBD donors; DCD pancreas transplantation is now common practice in several countries in Europe, particularly the United Kingdom. Although there have been reports of higher thrombosis rates after DCD pancreas transplantation, the significance of this is difficult to judge as the impact has not been seen in overall graft survival.

SUMMARY

Pancreas transplantation using DCD organs is well tolerated and feasible when other risk factors are minimized. Although there has been some evidence of an increased risk of thrombosis, this has not translated into a significant difference in graft survival.

Development of pancreatic machine perfusion: translational steps from porcine to human models

BACKGROUND

Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) is increasingly being used for extended criteria kidney grafts. Pancreatic HMP is challenging because physiologically the pancreas is a low-flow organ susceptible to edema. We report the successful development of preclinical HMP models using porcine pancreases, as well as human pancreases unsuitable for clinical transplantation.

METHODS

Ten porcine pancreases were used in the development of these perfusion models. Pancreases underwent 24 h of static cold storage (SCS, n = 3) and then viability assessment on an isolated oxygenated normothermic reperfusion (NRP) circuit or 24-h SCS, 5 h of HMP, and then NRP (SCS-HMP, n = 3). Human pancreases (n = 3) were used in the development of a preclinical model.

RESULTS

Porcine HMP demonstrated stable perfusion indices at low pressures, with a weight gain of between 15.3% and 27.6%. During NRP, SCS-HMP pancreases demonstrated stable perfusion flow indices (PFIs) throughout reperfusion (area under the curve was in the range of 0.49-2.04 mL/min/100 g/mm Hg), whereas SCS-only pancreases had deteriorating PFI with a decline of between 19% and 46%. Human pancreas models demonstrated stable PFI between 0.18 and 0.69 mL/min/100 g/mm Hg during HMP with weight gain of between 3.9% and 14.7%. NRP perfusion in porcine and human models was stable, and functional assessment via insulin secretion demonstrated beta cell viability. Exocrine function was intact with production of pancreatic secretions only in human grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of machine perfusion in preclinical porcine and human pancreas models is feasible and successful; the development of these translational models could be beneficial in improving pancreas preservation before transplantation and allowing organ viability assessment and optimization.

Outcomes From Pancreatic Transplantation in Donation After Cardiac Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Pancreas transplantation remains the gold standard for treatment for type I diabetes providing an insulin-independent, normoglycemic state. Increasingly, donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors are used in view of the organ donor shortage. We aimed to systematically review recipient outcomes from DCD donors and where possible compared these with donor after brain death (DBD) donors.

METHODS

We searched the databases MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library from inception to March 2015, for studies reporting the outcome of DCD pancreas transplants. We appraised studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and meta-analyzed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

We identified 18 studies, 4 retrospective and 6 prospective cohort studies and 8 case reports. Our bias assessment revealed that although studies were well conducted, some studies had potential confounding factors and absence of comparator groups. Eight of the 18 studies included a DBD comparison group comprising 23 609 transplant recipients. Importantly, there was no significant difference in allograft survival up to 10 years (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.74-1.31; P = 0.92), or patient survival (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.62-2.78; P = 0.47) between DCD and DBD pancreas transplants. We estimated that the odds of graft thrombosis was 1.67 times higher in DCD organs (95% CI, 1.04-2.67; P = 0.006). However, subgroup analysis found thrombosis was not higher in recipients whose DCD donors were given antemortem heparin (P = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Using current DCD criteria, pancreas transplantation is a viable alternative to DBD transplantation, and antemortem interventions including heparinization may be beneficial. This potential benefit of DCD pancreas donation warrants further study.

Pre-transplantation 31P-magnetic resonance spectroscopy for quality assessment of human pancreatic grafts - A feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility of using ³¹P-MRS for objective non-invasive quality assessment of human pancreas grafts prior to transplantation or islet isolation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pancreata from 5 human donors, 3 males and 2 females, aged 49-78years, with body mass index (BMI) 22-31kg/m², were included. Pancreata were perfused with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution during procurement and stored in hypothermic condition (4°C) for 21-44h. During the period of hypothermic storage repeated spectra were obtained for each graft by ³¹P-MRS (1.5Tesla) to measure the cold ischemia time (CIT) dependent changes of the phosphorous metabolites adenosine triphosphate (ATP), phosphomonoesters (PME), phosphodiesters (PDE) and inorganic phosphate (Pi), in the grafts. Graft temperature was measured immediately before and after MR-examination. Reference spectrum for non-viable tissue was obtained after graft exposure to room temperature.

RESULTS

PME/Pi, PDE/Pi and ATP/Pi spectral intensities ratios decreased with increasing CIT, reflecting the decreased viability of the grafts. PME/Pi ratio was the most discriminatory variable at prolonged CIT. ³¹P-MRS could be performed without significantly increasing graft temperature.

CONCLUSIONS

³¹P-MRS may provide quantitative parameters for evaluating graft viability ex vivo, and is a promising tool for objective non-invasive assessment of the quality of human pancreas grafts prior to transplantation or islet isolation.

Outcome of pancreas transplantation from donation after circulatory death compared to donation after brain death

INTRODUCTION

To overcome the gap of organ shortage grafts from donation after circulatory death (DCD) can be used. This review evaluates the outcomes after DCD pancreas donation compared to donation after brain death (DBD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, and PubMed databases. All comparative cohort studies reporting the outcome after DCD and DBD pancreas transplantation were included. All data were assessed according to the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. To evaluate the event rates, pooled odds ratios (ORs) as well as the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Since the number of studies is small we used the random-effects model only to overcome heterogeneity.

RESULTS

There is no difference in 1-year pancreas graft survival (OR 1.092, CI 95% 0.649-1.837, P = 0.741) or patient survival (OR 0.699, CI 95% 0.246-1.985, P = 0.502). Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation showed significantly higher graft survival rates compared to pancreas transplantation alone (87.2% vs. 76.6%, P < 0.001 in DBD and 86.5% vs. 74.9%, P < 0.001 in DCD). DCD SPK grafts show a higher delayed kidney graft function rate compared to DBD SPK-grafts (OR 0.209, CI 95% 0.104-0.421, P < 0.001). There is significantly less pancreas graft thrombosis after DBD-donation (OR 0.567, CI 95% 0.340-0.946, P = 0.030). We found no difference in the HbA1c level at 1-year follow-up with a median of 5.4% in both groups and a mean of 5.63% (DCD) vs 5.43% (DBD).

DISCUSSION

DCD pancreas transplantation has comparable patient and 1-year graft survival rates and should be considered a safe alternative for DBD pancreas transplantation.

Donor risk indices in pancreas allocation in the Eurotransplant region

Pancreas donor selection and recognition are important to cope with increasing organ shortage. We aim to show that the PDRI is more useful than the P-PASS to predict acceptance and should thus be preferred over P-PASS. Eurotransplant donors from 2004 until 2014 were included in this study. PDRI logistical factors were set to reference to purely reflect donor quality (PDRI donor ). PDRI and P-PASS association with allocation outcome was studied using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Regional differences in donor quality were also investigated. Of the 10 444 pancreata that were reported, 6090 (58.3%) were accepted and 2947 (28.2%) were transplanted. We found that P-PASS was inferior to PDRIdonor in its ability to predict organ reporting, acceptance, and transplantation: AUC 0.63, 0.67 and 0.73 for P-PASS vs. 0.78, 0.79 and 0.84 for PDRIdonor , respectively. Furthermore, there were significant differences in donor quality among different Eurotransplant countries, both in reported donors and in transplanted organs. PDRI is a powerful predictor of allocation outcome and should be preferred over P-PASS. Proper donor selection and recognition, and possibly a more liberal approach toward inferior quality donors, may increase donation and transplant rates.

Thirty Years of Pancreas Transplantation at Leiden University Medical Center: Long-term Follow-up in a Large Eurotransplant Center

BACKGROUND

An overview of 30 years of pancreas transplantation at a high volume center. Analysis of patient survival- and graft survival-associated risk factors.

METHODS

All pancreas transplantations performed in our center from January 1, 1984, till December 31, 2012, were evaluated. Covariates influencing pancreas graft survival were analyzed using both univariate and multivariate analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

In the study period, 349 pancreas transplantations were performed. With the introduction of modern induction therapy in 1999, 5-year patient survival improved to 92.0% (P = 0.003). Five-year pancreas graft survival improved to 80.3% (P = 0.026). Pancreas graft survival was influenced by left or right donor kidney, transplant type, local origin of procurement team, pancreas cold ischemia time, recipient cerebrovascular disease. Pancreas donor risk index increased to 1.39 over the years and pancreas donor risk index 1.24 or higher is a risk factor for graft survival (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

This study has shown excellent results in patient and pancreas graft survivals after 30 years of pancreas transplantation in a high volume center. Different donor, transplant, and recipient related risk factors influence pancreas graft survival. Even with higher risk pancreas donors, good results can be achieved.

A registry analysis of damage to the deceased donor pancreas during procurement

Surgical injury to the pancreas is thought to occur commonly during procurement. The UK Transplant Registry was analyzed to determine the frequency of pancreatic injuries, identify factors associated with damage, and assess the impact of injuries on graft survival. Twelve hundred ninety-six pancreata were procured from donation after brain death donors, with 314 (19.5%) from donation after circulatory death donors. More than 50% of recovered pancreata had at least one injury, most commonly a short portal vein (21.5%). Liver donation, procurement team origin, hepatic artery (HA) arising from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), and increasing donor BMI were associated with increased rates of pancreas damage on univariate analyses; on multivariate analysis only the presence of an HA from the SMA remained significant (p = 0.02). Six hundred forty solid organ pancreas transplants were performed; 238 had some form of damage. Overall, there was no difference in graft survival between damaged and undamaged organs (p = 0.28); however, graft loss was significantly more frequent in pancreata with arterial damage (p = 0.04) and in those with parenchymal damage (p = 0.05). Damage to the pancreas during organ recovery is more common than other organs, and meticulous surgical technique and awareness of damage risk factors are essential to reduce rates of procurement-related injuries.

Utilization of organs from donors after circulatory death for vascularized pancreas and islet of Langerhans transplantation: recommendations from an expert group

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors are increasingly being used as a source of pancreas allografts for vascularized organ and islet transplantation. We provide practice guidelines aiming to increase DCD pancreas utilization. We review risk assessment and donor selection criteria. We report suggested factors in donor and recipient clinical management and provide an overview of the activities and outcomes of vascularized pancreas and islet transplantation.

Retrieval of the pancreas allograft for whole-organ transplantation

Proper pancreas retrieval during multi-organ recovery is one of the cornerstones of technically successful whole-organ pancreas transplantation. With evolving surgical approaches for organ retrieval and implantation, it has become standard to procure the pancreas in conjunction with other abdominal organs without compromising either vasculature, graft quality, or transplant outcomes. This review summarizes the major steps required for proper whole-organ retrieval of the pancreas allograft with suggestions and tips whenever alternative approaches are available.

Pancreas transplantation: a treatment option for people with diabetes

Since the first pancreas transplants in the early 1960s, whole-organ pancreas transplantation, either alone or combined with kidney transplantation, has become commonplace in many countries around the world. Whole-organ pancreas transplantation is available in the UK, with ~200 transplants currently carried out per year. Patient survival and pancreas graft outcome rates are now similar to other solid organ transplant programmes, with high rates of long-term insulin independence. In the present review, we will discuss whole-pancreas transplantation as a treatment for diabetes, focusing on indications for transplantation, the nature of the procedure performed, graft survival rates and the consequences of pancreas transplantation on metabolic variables and the progression of diabetes-related complications.

Donation after circulatory death: current practices, ongoing challenges, and potential improvements

Organ donation after circulatory death (DCD) has been endorsed by the World Health Organization and is practiced worldwide. This overview examines current DCD practices, identifies problems and challenges, and suggests clinical strategies for possible improvement. Although there is uniform agreement on DCD donor candidacy (ventilator-dependent individuals with nonrecoverable or irreversible neurologic injury not meeting brain death criteria), there are variations in all aspects of DCD practice. Utilization of DCD organs is limited by hypoxia, hypotension, reduced--then absent--organ perfusion, and ischemia/reperfusion syndrome. Nevertheless, DCD kidneys exhibit comparable function and survival to donors with brain death kidneys, although they have higher rates of primary graft nonfunction, delayed graft function, discard, and retrieval associated injury. Concern over ischemic organ injury underscores the reluctance to recover extrarenal DCD organs since lack of medical therapy to support inadequate allograft function limits their acceptability. Nevertheless, limited results with DCD pancreas, liver, and lung allografts (but not heart) are now approaching that of donors with brain death organs. Pretransplant machine perfusion of DCD kidneys (vs. static storage) may reduce delayed graft function but has no effect on long-term organ function and survival. Normothermic regional perfusion used during DCD abdominal organ retrieval may reduce ischemic organ injury and increase the number of usable organs, although critical confirmative studies have yet to be done. Minor increases in usable DCD kidneys could accrue from increased use of pediatric DCD kidneys and from selective use of DCD/ECD kidneys, whereas a modest increase could result through utilization of donors declared dead beyond 1 hr from withdrawal of life support therapy. A significant increase in transplantable kidneys could be achieved by extension of the concept of living kidney donation in relation to imminent death of potential DCD donors. Progress in research to identify, prevent, and repair DCD-associated organ retrieval injury should improve utilization of DCD organs. Recent results using ex situ pretransplant organ perfusion of DCD organs has been encouraging in this regard.