1
|
Malik AK, Tingle SJ, Chung N, Owen R, Mahendran B, Counter C, Sinha S, Muthasamy A, Sutherland A, Casey J, Drage M, van Dellen D, Callaghan CJ, Elker D, Manas DM, Pettigrew GJ, Wilson CH, White SA. The impact of time to death in donors after circulatory death on recipient outcome in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00134-5. [PMID: 38360185 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
The time to arrest donors after circulatory death is unpredictable and can vary. This leads to variable periods of warm ischemic damage prior to pancreas transplantation. There is little evidence supporting procurement team stand-down times based on donor time to death (TTD). We examined what impact TTD had on pancreas graft outcomes following donors after circulatory death (DCD) simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Data were extracted from the UK transplant registry from 2014 to 2022. Predictors of graft loss were evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Adjusted restricted cubic spline models were generated to further delineate the relationship between TTD and outcome. Three-hundred-and-seventy-five DCD simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients were included. Increasing TTD was not associated with graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio HR 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.68-1.41, P = .901). Increasing asystolic time worsened graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio 2.51, 95% confidence interval 1.16-5.43, P = .020). Restricted cubic spline modeling revealed a nonlinear relationship between asystolic time and graft survival and no relationship between TTD and graft survival. We found no evidence that TTD impacts pancreas graft survival after DCD simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation; however, increasing asystolic time was a significant predictor of graft loss. Procurement teams should attempt to minimize asystolic time to optimize pancreas graft survival rather than focus on the duration of TTD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah K Malik
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Samuel J Tingle
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nicholas Chung
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Cramlington, UK
| | - Ruth Owen
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Balaji Mahendran
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Sanjay Sinha
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - John Casey
- Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Martin Drage
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Chris J Callaghan
- NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Doruk Elker
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Derek M Manas
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge, UK; NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - Gavin J Pettigrew
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Colin H Wilson
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge, UK
| | - Steven A White
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge, UK; NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Owen RV, Carr HJ, Counter C, Tingle SJ, Thompson ER, Manas DM, Shaw JA, Wilson CH, White SA. Multi-Centre UK Analysis of Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney (SPK) Transplant in Recipients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Transpl Int 2024; 36:11792. [PMID: 38370534 PMCID: PMC10869449 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
90% of the UK diabetic population are classified as T2DM. This study aims to compare outcomes after SPK transplant between recipients with T1DM or T2DM. Data on all UK SPK transplants from 2003-2019 were obtained from the NHSBT Registry (n = 2,236). Current SPK transplant selection criteria for T2DM requires insulin treatment and recipient BMI < 30 kg/m2. After exclusions (re-transplants/ambiguous type of diabetes) we had a cohort of n = 2,154. Graft (GS) and patient (PS) survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox-regression models. Complications were compared using chi-squared analyses. 95.6% of SPK transplants were performed in recipients with T1DM (n = 2,060). Univariate analysis showed comparable outcomes for pancreas GS at 1 year (p = 0.120), 3 years (p = 0.237), and 10 years (p = 0.196) and kidney GS at 1 year (p = 0.438), 3 years (p = 0.548), and 10 years (p = 0.947). PS was comparable at 1 year (p = 0.886) and 3 years (p = 0.237) and at 10 years (p = 0.161). Multi-variate analysis showed comparable outcomes in pancreas GS (p = 0.564, HR 1.221, 95% CI 0.619, 2.406) and PS(p = 0.556, HR 1.280, 95% CI 0.563, 2.911). Comparable rates of common complications were demonstrated. This is the largest series outside of the US evaluating outcomes after SPK transplants and shows similar outcomes between T1DM and T2DM recipients. It is hoped dissemination of this data will lead to increased referral rates and assessment of T2DM patients who could benefit from SPK transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth V. Owen
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | | | - Claire Counter
- Statistics and Clinical Research, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Samuel J. Tingle
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Blood and Transplant Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Emily R. Thompson
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Derek M. Manas
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - James A. Shaw
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Blood and Transplant Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Colin H. Wilson
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Blood and Transplant Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Steve A. White
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Blood and Transplant Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Counter C, Owen R, Sinha S, Muthusamy A, Drage M, Callaghan C, Elker D, Harper S, Sutherland A, Van Dellen D, Johnson P, Manas D, Shaw J, Forsythe J, Wilson C, Hughes S, Casey J, White S. O007 Pancreas and islet transplantation in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 era. Br J Surg 2022; 109:znac242.007. [PMCID: PMC9384530 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac242.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Methods Results Conclusion Take-home message
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - R Owen
- NHSBT Pancreas Advisory Group
| | - S Sinha
- NHSBT Pancreas Advisory Group
| | | | - M Drage
- NHSBT Pancreas Advisory Group
| | | | - D Elker
- NHSBT Pancreas Advisory Group
| | | | | | | | | | - D Manas
- NHSBT Pancreas Advisory Group
| | - J Shaw
- NHSBT Pancreas Advisory Group
| | | | | | | | - J Casey
- NHSBT Pancreas Advisory Group
| | - S White
- NHSBT Pancreas Advisory Group
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Owen RV, Counter C, Shaw JA, Wilson CH, White SA. O002 Diabetes-associated HLA donor genotypes and pancreas transplant outcomes. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac242.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The genotypes HLA DR3/DR4, DR3/DR3, DR4/DR4 are associated with a predisposition to diabetes. This study evaluated UK recipient outcomes after pancreas transplantation from donors with a diabetes-associated genotypes.
Methods
Data on all UK pancreas transplants from 2004–2019 was obtained from the NHSBT-UK Registry, n=2,938. HLA-DR type was recorded for all organ donors. Re-transplants and those missing patient (PS) or graft (GS) survival were excluded, resulting in a final cohort of n=2,661. We further delineated our categories into SPK, PTA and PAK as a previous study suggested different recipient categories may be adversely affected. Univariate analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier plots and multi-variate analysis using Cox-regression models. Complications were analysed using chi-squared analyses.
Results
The majority of grafts were from donors not associated with diabetes genotypes (90.1%, n=2397) whereas 5.4%(n=145) came from HLA DR3/DR4 donors, 1.6%(n=43) from DR3/DR3 and (n=76)2.9% from DR4/DR4. Comparable outcomes for GS at 1yr (SPK p=0.980, PTA p=0.759, PAK p=0.244) and 3yrs (SPK p=0.708, PTA p=0.744, PAK p=0.275) and PS at 1yr (SPK p=0.553, PTA p=0.527, PAK p=0.756) and 3yrs (SPK p=0.728, PTA p=0.928, PAK p=0.424) were seen. Multivariate analysis also showed no statistically significant difference in GS (p=0.604, HR 1.041, 95%CI 0.895, 1.211) or PS (p=0.623, HR 1.045, 95%CI 0.876, 1.248). There were comparable complication rates.
Conclusion
This multicentre UK study has found comparable survival outcomes and complication rates within our donor-HLA-genotype groups. We do not believe that the presence or absence of a diabetes associated HLA-genotype influences outcomes for any category of pancreas transplant.
Take-home message
We do not believe that the presence or absence of a diabetes-associated HLA-genotype influences outcomes for any category of pancreas transplant.
Collapse
|
5
|
Forbes S, Flatt AJ, Bennett D, Crookston R, Pimkova M, Birtles L, Pernet A, Wood RC, Burling K, Barker P, Counter C, Lumb A, Choudhary P, Rutter M, Rosenthal M, Sutherland A, Casey J, Johnson P, Shaw JAM. The impact of islet mass, number of transplants, and time between transplants on graft function in a national islet transplant program. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:154-164. [PMID: 34355503 PMCID: PMC9292186 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The UK islet allotransplant program is nationally funded to deliver one or two transplants over 12 months to individuals with type 1 diabetes and recurrent severe hypoglycemia. Analyses were undertaken 10 years after program inception to evaluate associations between transplanted mass; single versus two transplants; time between two transplants and graft survival (stimulated C-peptide >50 pmol/L) and function. In total, 84 islet transplant recipients were studied. Uninterrupted graft survival over 12 months was attained in 23 (68%) single and 47 (94%) (p = .002) two transplant recipients (separated by [median (IQR)] 6 (3-8) months). 64% recipients of one or two transplants with uninterrupted function at 12 months sustained graft function at 6 years. Total transplanted mass was associated with Mixed Meal Tolerance Test stimulated C-peptide at 12 months (p < .01). Despite 1.9-fold greater transplanted mass in recipients of two versus one islet infusion (12 218 [9291-15 417] vs. 6442 [5156-7639] IEQ/kg; p < .0001), stimulated C-peptide was not significantly higher. Shorter time between transplants was associated with greater insulin dose reduction at 12 months (beta -0.35; p = .02). Graft survival over the first 12 months was greater in recipients of two versus one islet transplant in the UK program, although function at 1 and 6 years was comparable. Minimizing the interval between 2 islet infusions may maximize cumulative impact on graft function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shareen Forbes
- BHF Centre for Cardiovascular SciencesQueen's Medical Research InstituteUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
- Transplant UnitRoyal Infirmary of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Anneliese J. Flatt
- Translational and Clinical Research InstituteNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
- Institute of TransplantationFreeman HospitalNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Denise Bennett
- Institute of TransplantationFreeman HospitalNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Robert Crookston
- Nuffield Department of SurgeryUniversity of OxfordJohn Radcliffe HospitalOxfordUK
| | - Mirka Pimkova
- Institute of Immunity and TransplantationRoyal Free HospitalLondonUK
| | - Linda Birtles
- Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism CentreManchester University NHS Foundation TrustManchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
| | - Andrew Pernet
- Department of DiabetesSchool of Life Course SciencesKing's College LondonUK
| | - Ruth C. Wood
- Newcastle Clinical Trials UnitNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Keith Burling
- Core Biochemical Assay LaboratoryNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreCambridgeUK
| | - Peter Barker
- Core Biochemical Assay LaboratoryNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreCambridgeUK
| | - Claire Counter
- NHS Blood and Transplant, Statistics and Clinical ResearchBristolUK
| | - Alistair Lumb
- Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and MetabolismUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research CentreOxfordUK
| | - Pratik Choudhary
- Department of DiabetesSchool of Life Course SciencesKing's College LondonUK
| | - Martin K. Rutter
- Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism CentreManchester University NHS Foundation TrustManchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and GastroenterologySchool of Medical SciencesFaculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Miranda Rosenthal
- Institute of Immunity and TransplantationRoyal Free HospitalLondonUK
| | | | - John Casey
- Transplant UnitRoyal Infirmary of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Paul Johnson
- Nuffield Department of SurgeryUniversity of OxfordJohn Radcliffe HospitalOxfordUK
| | - James A. M. Shaw
- Translational and Clinical Research InstituteNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
- Institute of TransplantationFreeman HospitalNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNewcastle upon TyneUK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Callaghan CJ, Ibrahim M, Counter C, Casey J, Friend PJ, Watson CJE, Karydis N. Outcomes after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation from donation after circulatory death donors: A UK registry analysis. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:3673-3683. [PMID: 33870619 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
There are concerns that simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplants from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors have a higher risk of graft failure than those from donation after brain death (DBD) donors. A UK registry analysis of SPK transplants between 2005 and 2018 was performed. Pancreas survivals of those receiving organs from DCD or DBD donors were compared. Multivariable analyses were used to adjust for baseline differences between the two groups and to identify factors associated with pancreas graft loss. A total of 2228 SPK transplants were implanted; 403 (18.1%) were from DCD donors. DCD donors were generally younger, slimmer, less likely to have stroke as a cause of death, with lower terminal creatinines and shorter pancreas cold ischemic times than DBD donors. Median (IQR) follow-up was 4.2 (1.6-8.1) years. On univariable analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in 5-year death-censored pancreas graft survival between the two donor types (79.5% versus 80.4%; p = .86). Multivariable analysis showed no statistically significant differences in 5-year pancreas graft loss between transplants from DCD (n = 343) and DBD (n = 1492) donors (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% CI 0.76-1.23; p = .12). The findings from this study support the increased use of SPK transplants from DCD donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris J Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Maria Ibrahim
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Statistics and Clinical Studies, National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - Claire Counter
- Statistics and Clinical Studies, National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - John Casey
- Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter J Friend
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Christopher J E Watson
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, and Cambridge NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, The NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nikolaos Karydis
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sabbah S, Liew A, Brooks AM, Kundu R, Reading JL, Flatt A, Counter C, Choudhary P, Forbes S, Rosenthal MJ, Rutter MK, Cairns S, Johnson P, Casey J, Peakman M, Shaw JA, Tree TIM. Autoreactive T cell profiles are altered following allogeneic islet transplantation with alemtuzumab induction and re-emerging phenotype is associated with graft function. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:1027-1038. [PMID: 32865886 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Islet transplantation is an effective therapy for life-threatening hypoglycemia, but graft function gradually declines over time in many recipients. We characterized islet-specific T cells in recipients within an islet transplant program favoring alemtuzumab (ATZ) lymphodepleting induction and examined associations with graft function. Fifty-eight recipients were studied: 23 pretransplant and 40 posttransplant (including 5 with pretransplant phenotyping). The proportion with islet-specific T cell responses was not significantly different over time (pre-Tx: 59%; 1-6 m posttransplant: 38%; 7-12 m: 44%; 13-24 m: 47%; and >24 m: 45%). However, phenotype shifted significantly, with IFN-γ-dominated response in the pretransplant group replaced by IL-10-dominated response in the 1-6 m posttransplant group, reverting to predominantly IFN-γ-oriented response in the >24 m group. Clustering analysis of posttransplant responses revealed two main agglomerations, characterized by IFN-γ and IL-10 phenotypes, respectively. IL-10-oriented posttransplant response was associated with relatively low graft function. Recipients within the IL-10+ cluster had a significant decline in C-peptide levels in the period preceding the IL-10 response, but stable graft function following the response. In contrast, an IFN-γ response was associated with subsequently decreased C-peptide. Islet transplantation favoring ATZ induction is associated with an initial altered islet-specific T cell phenotype but reversion toward pretransplant profiles over time. Posttransplant autoreactive T cell phenotype may be a predictor of subsequent graft function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shereen Sabbah
- Department of Immunobiology, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Aaron Liew
- Newcastle University Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle, UK
| | - Augustin M Brooks
- Newcastle University Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle, UK
| | - Rhiannon Kundu
- Department of Immunobiology, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - James L Reading
- Department of Immunobiology, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Anneliese Flatt
- Newcastle University Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle, UK
| | - Claire Counter
- Organ Donation and Transplantation, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - Pratik Choudhary
- Diabetes Research Group, Guy's, King's and St. Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Shareen Forbes
- Edinburgh Transplant Centre and Endocrinology Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Martin K Rutter
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephanie Cairns
- Clinical Immunology Department, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Paul Johnson
- Oxford Centre for Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - John Casey
- Edinburgh Transplant Centre and Endocrinology Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mark Peakman
- Department of Immunobiology, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - James A Shaw
- Newcastle University Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle, UK.,Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Timothy I M Tree
- Department of Immunobiology, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Despite major advances in structured education, insulin delivery and glucose monitoring, diabetes self-management remains an unremitting challenge. Insulin therapy is inextricably linked to risk of dangerous hypoglycaemia and sustained hyperglycaemia remains a leading cause of renal failure. This review sets out to demystify transplantation for diabetes multidisciplinary teams, facilitating consideration and incorporation within holistic overall person-centred management. Deceased and living donor kidney, whole pancreas and isolated islet transplant procedures, indications and potential benefits are described, in addition to outcomes within the integrated UK transplant programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J S Flatt
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - D Bennett
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - C Counter
- Statistics and Clinical Studies, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - A L Brown
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - S A White
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - J A M Shaw
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Summers DM, Counter C, Johnson RJ, Murphy PG, Neuberger JM, Bradley JA. Is the increase in DCD organ donors in the United Kingdom contributing to a decline in DBD donors? Transplantation 2011; 90:1506-10. [PMID: 21079550 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3182007b33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Organ donation after brain death (DBD) has declined in the United Kingdom, whereas donation after cardiac death (DCD) has increased markedly. We sought to understand the reasons for the decline in DBD and determine whether the increase in DCD was a major factor. METHODS The UK Transplant Registry was analyzed to determine trends in organ donation. Data from the "Potential Donor Audit," an audit of all patients younger than 76 years who died in noncardiothoracic UK intensive care units, was analyzed to identify trends in clinical demographics and management and to determine whether potential donors (DBD and DCD) were identified and appropriate steps were taken to enable organ donation. RESULTS There were 7589 (12.8 per million of population [pmp]) deceased organ donors in the United Kingdom from 1999 to 2009. The total number of deceased donors increased by 16% (to 14.9 pmp), but DBD donors decreased from 744 to 612, and the overall increase in donors was due to an 8-fold increase in DCD donors (33 in 1999 to 2000, 288 in 2008 to 2009). Analysis of the Potential Donor Audit over the 5-year period 2004 to 2005 to 2008 to 2009 showed that the number of patients dying in intensive care units who were possibly brain stem dead (comatose, apparently apnoeic with unresponsive pupils) decreased from 1929 in 2004 to 2005 to 1495 in 2008 to 2009 (22.5% reduction). The proportion of potential DBD donors who became donors increased from 45% to 51%. CONCLUSION There is no evidence that the increase in DCD donors has contributed directly to the decline in DBD, which reflects a decrease in the number of patients with brain death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominic M Summers
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Watson CJE, Roberts R, Wright KA, Greenberg DC, Rous BA, Brown CH, Counter C, Collett D, Bradley JA. How safe is it to transplant organs from deceased donors with primary intracranial malignancy? An analysis of UK Registry data. Am J Transplant 2010; 10:1437-44. [PMID: 20486904 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03130.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Patients dying from primary intracranial malignancy are a potential source of organs for transplantation. However, a perceived risk of tumor transfer to the organ recipient has limited their use. We evaluated the risk of tumor transmission by reviewing the incidence in patients transplanted in the UK. Information from the UK Transplant Registry was combined with that from the national cancer registries of England, Wales and Northern Ireland to identify all organ donors between 1985 and 2001 inclusive with a primary intracranial malignancy and to identify the occurrence of posttransplant malignancy in the recipients of the organs transplanted. Of 11,799 organ donors in the study period, 179 were identified as having had a primary intracranial malignancy, including 33 with high-grade malignancy (24 grade IV gliomas and 9 medulloblastomas). A total of 448 recipients of 495 organs from 177 of these donors were identified. No transmission of donor intracranial malignancy occurred. Organs from patients dying from primary intracranial malignancy, including those with high-grade tumors, should be considered for transplantation and the small risk of tumor transmission should be balanced against the likely mortality for potential recipients who remain on the transplant waiting list.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C J E Watson
- University Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge and the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hu PP, Shen X, Huang D, Liu Y, Counter C, Wang XF. The MEK pathway is required for stimulation of p21(WAF1/CIP1) by transforming growth factor-beta. J Biol Chem 1999; 274:35381-7. [PMID: 10585406 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.274.50.35381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta)can induce the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21 and p15 in a variety of cell types. We have shown previously that Smad3 is required for the growth inhibitory activity of TGF-beta, whereas overexpression of Smads is not sufficient to activate the expression of p21 in HaCaT cells. These data suggest that an additional signaling pathway may be involved in stimulating p21 in HaCaT cells. Given the recent finding that the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway can cause p21 induction and arrest cells, we examined the involvement of this pathway for p21 and p15 induction by TGF-beta. We found that TGF-beta can regulate the MAPK pathway, leading to the increased transactivation ability of transcription factor Elk. Constitutively active components in the MAPK pathway activate p21 expression, and inhibitors or dominant negative constructs for the MAPK pathway significantly decrease p21 induction by TGF-beta. Both constitutively active MEK and inhibitors for MEK have no effect on Smad activity, including DNA binding, localization, and interaction with coactivator p300/CBP. These findings suggest that the MAPK pathway may be an independent pathway that is involved in p21 and p15 induction by TGF-beta.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P P Hu
- Department of Pharmacology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Xie Y, Counter C, Alani E. Characterization of the repeat-tract instability and mutator phenotypes conferred by a Tn3 insertion in RFC1, the large subunit of the yeast clamp loader. Genetics 1999; 151:499-509. [PMID: 9927446 PMCID: PMC1460510 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/151.2.499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The RFC1 gene encodes the large subunit of the yeast clamp loader (RFC) that is a component of eukaryotic DNA polymerase holoenzymes. We identified a mutant allele of RFC1 (rfc1::Tn3) from a large collection of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants that were inviable when present in a rad52 null mutation background. Analysis of rfc1::Tn3 strains indicated that they displayed both a mutator and repeat-tract instability phenotype. Strains bearing this allele were characterized in combination with mismatch repair (msh2Delta, pms1Delta), double-strand break repair (rad52), and DNA replication (pol3-01, pol30-52, rth1Delta/rad27Delta) mutations in both forward mutation and repeat-tract instability assays. This analysis indicated that the rfc1::Tn3 allele displays synthetic lethality with pol30, pol3, and rad27 mutations. Measurement of forward mutation frequencies in msh2Delta rfc1:Tn3 and pms1Delta rfc1:Tn3 strains indicated that the rfc1::Tn3 mutant displayed a mutation frequency that appeared nearly multiplicative with the mutation frequency exhibited by mismatch-repair mutants. In repeat-tract instability assays, however, the rfc1::Tn3 mutant displayed a tract instability phenotype that appeared epistatic to the phenotype displayed by mismatch-repair mutants. From these data we propose that defects in clamp loader function result in DNA replication errors, a subset of which are acted upon by the mismatch-repair system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Xie
- Section of Genetics and Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-2703, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Meyerson M, Counter C, Eaton E, Steiner P, Beijersbergen R, Caddle S, Hahn W, Dessain S, Ellisen L, Haber D, Weinberg R. Telomerase enzyme activation and human cell immortalization. Toxicol Lett 1998. [DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4274(98)80014-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
14
|
Bacchetti S, Counter C. Telomeres and telomerase in human cancer (review). Int J Oncol 1995; 7:423-432. [PMID: 21552856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Telomerase has recently come into the limelight as one of the most prevalent tumour markers, due to its nearly ubiquitous presence in malignant tissues and absence from most somatic tissues. The essential role of telomeres in unlimited cell proliferation and that of the enzyme in telomere maintenance have suggested that telomerase inhibitors may be effective in cancer therapy. We provide here a compendium and an evaluation of the available data relating to this hypothesis.
Collapse
|