Long-term psychosocial consequences of hormone treatment for short stature

Quality of Life of Children and Adolescents with Short Stature: The Twofold Contribution of Physical Growth and Adaptive Height-Related Cognitive Beliefs

This study aimed to examine the health-related quality of life (HrQoL), coping, height-related beliefs, and social support of children/adolescents with short stature, the sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial variables associated with HrQoL, and the moderating role of sociodemographic and clinical variables on the associations between psychosocial variables and HrQoL. 114 Portuguese children/adolescents with short stature, aged 8-18 years old, completed the Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth questionnaire and the Satisfaction with Social Support Scale. Regression analyses explained 54% of the variance of HrQoL, with significant main effects of current height deviation and height-related beliefs, and a significant interaction effect between beliefs and diagnosis. Results suggest that a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach, not only focused on hormone treatment to boost physical growth, but also including psychosocial interventions focused on the modification of height-related beliefs, may contribute to improve the HrQoL of pediatric patients with short stature.

A meta-analysis of combination therapy with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist and growth hormone for children with idiopathic short stature and normal timed puberty

PURPOSE

The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate whether the combination therapy with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) are effective in the treatment of children with idiopathic short stature (ISS) and normal timed puberty by interrogating data from clinical controlled trials.

METHODS

Literature retrieval, trail selection, data abstraction and quality assessment were completed independently by two authors. STATA software (version 14.1) was used for data analyses.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis was conducted based on 8 (4 randomized and 4 non-randomized) controlled trials. A total of 245 ISS children with normal timed puberty were financially analyzed. Overall, combination therapy with GnRHa and rhGH can slightly increase final height by 3.70 and 3.43 cm compared with GH treatment alone and no treatment, final height standard deviation score (FHSDS) by 0.10 and 0.22, final height minus predicted adult height (FH-PAH) by 1.5 and 5.32 cm, final height minus predicted adult height (FH-TH) by 7.70 and 4.32 cm, respectively. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses revealed that study type, sample size, GnRHa duration, and percentage of boys were potential sources of between-trial heterogeneity. There was a low probability of publication bias for above comparisons, as indicated by Egger's tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analytical findings indicate that the combination therapy with GnRHa and rhGH can slightly increase the final height of ISS children with normal timed puberty, and the effect was not more obvious than GH alone. We do not recommend the combination therapy as a routine treatment for ISS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019133438.

Should Skeletal Maturation Be Manipulated for Extra Height Gain?

Skeletal maturation can be delayed by reducing the exposure to estrogens, either by halting pubertal development through administering a GnRH analogue (GnRHa), or by blocking the conversion of androgens to estrogens through an aromatase inhibitor (AI). These agents have been investigated in children with growth disorders (off-label), either alone or in combination with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH). GnRHa is effective in attaining a normal adult height (AH) in the treatment of children with central precocious puberty, but its effect in short children with normal timing of puberty is equivocal. If rhGH-treated children with growth hormone deficiency or those who were born small-for-gestational age are still short at pubertal onset, co-treatment with a GnRHa for 2-3 years increases AH. A similar effect was seen by adding rhGH to GnRHa treatment of children with central precocious puberty with a poor AH prediction and by adding rhGH plus GnRHa to children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia with a poor predicted adult height on conventional treatment with gluco- and mineralocorticoids. In girls with idiopathic short stature and relatively early puberty, rhGH plus GnRHa increases AH. Administration of letrozole to boys with constitutional delay of growth puberty may increase AH, and rhGH plus anastrozole may increase AH in boys with growth hormone deficiency or idiopathic short stature, but the lack of data on attained AH and potential selective loss-of-follow-up in several studies precludes firm conclusions. GnRHas appear to have a good overall safety profile, while for aromatase inhibitors conflicting data have been reported.

Combined therapy with GnRH analogue and growth hormone increases adult height in children with short stature and normal pubertal onset

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) combined with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) can improve the adult height (AHt) of children with short stature and normal pubertal onset.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, GnRHa/rhGH treatment was given to children with normal pubertal onset and short stature. Patients were followed up to measure their AHt. The primary outcomes were the disparity between AHt standard deviation score (AHt SDS) and pre-treatment height standard deviation score (Ht SDS) and the disparity between AHt and target height (THt).

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients were included. Forty-nine boys were treated with GnRHa/rhGH for 24.84 ± 13.01 months, and 45 girls were treated for 23.89 ± 10.43 months. (2) Before treatment, the Ht SDS of boys and girls was -1.82 ± 1.30 and -1.10 ± 1.61, respectively, and the target height was 168.98 ± 3.51 cm and 157.90 ± 3.25 cm, respectively. (3) After treatment, for boys, the AHt SDS increased by 1.37 ± 1.28 (p = 0.000) and the disparity between AHt and THt was 0.98 ± 6.18 cm (p = 0.273); for girls, the AHtSDS increased by 1.28 ± 1.48 (p = 0.000), and the disparity between AHt and THt was 3.64 ± 4.86 cm (n = 45, p = 0.000). (4) Subgroup analysis showed that, for boys with idiopathic short stature (ISS) and non-ISS, AHt SDS increased by 2.00 ± 1.16 (p = 0.000) and 0.71 ± 1.06 (p = 0.003) respectively, compared with the pre-treatment HtSDS; The disparities between AHt and THt were -0.70 ± 6.54 cm and 2.73 ± 5.37 cm respectively. For girls with ISS and non-ISS, AHtSDS increased by 2.73 ± 1.21 (p = 0.000) and 0.748 ± 1.19 (p = 0.001), respectively; AHt increased by 2.63 ± 6.12 cm (p = 0.165) and 4.02 ± 4.37 cm (p = 0.000) compared with THt, respectively. (5) Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the baseline bone age (BA) (β = -0.200, p = 0.003), basal IGF-1(β = -0.002, p = 0.008) and HtSDS (β = -0.679, p = 0.000) had negative effects on increment of AHtSDS.

CONCLUSION

For adolescents with normal pubertal onset and short stature, with or without ISS, GnRHa/rhGH therapy can effectively improve AHtSDS. After treatment, ISS adolescents can reach the THts, and Non-ISS adolescents can exceed their THts.

Quality of Life of Short-Statured Children Born Small for Gestational Age or Idiopathic Growth Hormone Deficiency Within 1 Year of Growth Hormone Treatment

Aside from clinical endpoints like height gain, health-related quality of life has also become an important outcome indicator in the medical field. However, the data on short stature and health-related quality of life is inconsistent. Therefore, we examined changes in health-related quality of life in German children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency or children born small for gestational age before and after 12 months of human growth hormone treatment. Children with idiopathic short stature without treatment served as a comparison group. At baseline, health-related quality of life data of 154 patients with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency (n = 65), born small for gestational age (n = 58), and idiopathic short stature (n = 31) and one parent each was collected. Of these, 130 completed health-related quality of life assessments after 1-year of human growth hormone treatment. Outcome measures included the Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth questionnaire, as well as clinical and sociodemographic data. Our results showed that the physical, social, and emotional health-related quality of life of children treated with human growth hormone significantly increased, while untreated patients with idiopathic short stature reported a decrease in these domains. Along with this, a statistically significant increase in height in the treated group can be observed, while the slight increase in the untreated group was not significant. In conclusion, the results showed that human growth hormone treatment may have a positive effect not only on height but also in improving patient-reported health-related quality of life of children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency and children born small for gestational age.

Children's psychosocial functioning and parents' quality of life in paediatric short stature: The mediating role of caregiving stress

OBJECTIVES

On the basis of the multidimensional model of the caregiving process, this study aimed (a) to compare the levels of quality of life (QoL) and psychological problems of children with short stature and the levels of caregiving stress and QoL of their parents, between diagnostic, treatment, and current height deviation groups, and (b) to examine the direct and indirect links, via caregiving stress, between children's psychosocial functioning and their parents' QoL.

METHOD

The sample was collected in 5 European countries and comprised 238 dyads of 8- to 18-year-old children and adolescents with a clinical diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency or idiopathic short stature and one of their parents. The children completed self-report measures of height-related QoL (Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth Core Module) and psychological problems (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire); the parents reported on their own QoL (EUROHIS-QOL-8 Index) and caregiving stress (Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth Effects on Parents subscale).

RESULTS

Children who were treated and who achieved normal height reported better QoL compared to those untreated and with current short stature. Parents of children with idiopathic short stature and current short stature presented greater caregiving stress than parents of children with growth hormone deficiency and achieved normal height. Children's better psychosocial functioning was indirectly associated with parents' better QoL, via less caregiving stress, and these links were invariant across diagnoses, treatment status, and current height deviation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that, along with growth hormone treatments, multidisciplinary interventions in paediatric endocrinology should be family-centred, by targeting both the children's psychosocial functioning and the parents' stress, in order to improve individual and family adaptation.

Growth Promotion Ethics and the Challenge to Resist Cosmetic Endocrinology

The advancement of "human growth hormone (hGH)-for-height" - increasing height attainment in children short for reasons other than GH deficiency - arose from intuitive, deep-seated assumptions about the disability of short stature, its improvement with hGH-mediated height gain, and the safety of escalating dosages of hGH in healthy children. Evidence challenging these assumptions now strengthens criticism of hGH-for-height as cosmetic endocrinology. To counter this characterization, collective acceptance of guidelines is needed that advise nontreatment of the vast majority of short children, support strategies that minimize treatment duration and dosage, and restrain enhancement of normal adult stature. Through a clinical case analysis, ethical issues underlying these recommendations are explored. These include duties to provide informed assent and re-assent, protect children from unnecessary treatment, consider fairness to nontreated children, and allocate healthcare resources responsibly. Informed assent for hGH-for-height should ensure awareness of modest, variable height gain expectations, limited evidence for psychosocial benefit, ongoing studies for potential posttreatment adverse effects, and options for less expensive/invasive approaches, including nontreatment and counseling. Approaching growth pro-motion in this way fosters therapeutic restraint, resists the al lure of enhancement therapy, and minimizes contributions to society's perception that to be taller is to be better.
.

Understanding the impact of statural height on health-related quality of life in German adolescents: a population-based analysis

Improving health-related quality of life (HrQoL) is one aim of growth hormone treatment for short-statured patients. Yet, evidence of the relationship between height and HrQoL is inconclusive, especially for young people. This study investigates the association of height and HrQoL in the general German adolescent population. A total of 6646 adolescents and 6388 parents from the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KIGGS) were included in the analysis. An analysis of covariance was used to evaluate the effect of height deviation on HrQoL as assessed with the KINDL-R in adolescent self-report and parent-report, taking into account sociodemographic and health-related variables. Height was found to be a weak predictor of HrQoL in both adolescent-report and parent-report. Short and tall adolescents did not substantially differ from the normal statured. Sociodemographic and health-related variables failed to significantly interact with height. In contrast, psychosocial variables contributed to the explained HrQoL variance.

CONCLUSION

Height does not appear to be a strong determinant of HrQoL on the population level. These results suggest that the height gain in short stature treatment may not be the most important objective. Contrary to prevalent stereotypes, short adolescents can experience a high HrQoL.

Novel approaches to short stature therapy

Besides growth hormone, several pharmaceutical products have been investigated for efficacy and safety in increasing short term growth or adult height. Short-term treatment with testosterone esters in boys with constitutional delay of growth and puberty is efficacious in generating secondary sex characteristics and growth acceleration. The addition of oxandrolone to growth hormone (GH) in Turner syndrome has an additive effect on adult height gain. Treatment with GnRH analogs is the established treatment of central precocious puberty, and its addition to GH therapy appears effective in increasing adult height in GH deficient children, and possibly short children born SGA or with SHOX deficiency, who are still short at pubertal onset. Aromatase inhibitors appear effective in several rare disorders, but their value in increasing adult height in early pubertal boys with GH deficiency or idiopathic short stature is uncertain. A trial with a C-natriuretic peptide analog offers hope for children with achondroplasia.

HRQoL of European children and adolescents with short stature as assessed with generic (KIDSCREEN) and chronic-generic (DISABKIDS) instruments

Short stature may be associated with impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study compared the HRQoL of children/adolescents diagnosed with short stature to population norms and examined the effects of height deviation and treatment status on HRQoL.

METHOD

We cross-sectionally assessed 110 children/adolescents aged 8-18, with current short stature (height deviation ≤-2 standard-deviation (SD)) or normal height achieved since diagnosis, and 98 parents, using the generic KIDSCREEN and the chronic-generic DISABKIDS instruments.

RESULTS

Generic HRQoL of patients was similar to population norms. Patients with achieved normal height reported better chronic-generic HRQoL when untreated, while patients with current short stature reported better HRQoL upon receiving treatment. Parents reported better HRQoL for treated patients, especially for girls.

CONCLUSION

Although their HRQoL is not significantly compromised, patients diagnosed with short stature may profit from growth-hormone treatment. Specific instruments are needed to adequately assess the effectiveness of treatment.

A four-year, open-label, multi-center, randomized, two-arm study of Genotropin® in patients with idiopathic short stature: comparison of an individualized, target-driven treatment regimen to standard dosing of Genotropin® - analysis of two-year data

BACKGROUND

Several models have been developed to predict growth response to growth hormone (GH) based on auxological and biochemical parameters for children with non-GH-deficient, idiopathic short stature (ISS).

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate if an individualized, formula-based, target-driven GH regimen for children with ISS would lead to a height (Ht) gain to -1.3 SDS during the first 24 months of treatment of this 4-year study, with less variability than with standard weight-based dosing.

METHODS

A 4-year, open-label, multi-center, randomized, two-arm study comparing formula-based dosing of Genotropin® GH from 0.18 to 0.7 mg/kg/week versus standard FDA-approved ISS dosing of Genotropin® (0.37 mg/kg/week). Subjects (n = 316, 89 females) were prepubertal, 3-14 years of age, bone age 3-10 years (m) and 3-9 years (f), naive to GH treatment, Ht SDS -3 to -2.25, Ht velocity <25th percentile for bone age, and peak GH >10 ng/ml.

RESULTS

The majority (83%) of subjects had Ht SDS within the normal range by 2 years. All subjects displayed catch-up growth consistent with other studies of GH treatment of ISS.

CONCLUSION

The formula-based therapy did not meet the primary endpoint achieving targeted gain with lower variability. No new safety concerns were found.

Erfassung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität von kleinwüchsigen Kindern und Jugendlichen

Der Zugewinn an Körpergröße ist für die Lebensqualität vieler heranwachsender Menschen von Bedeutung–eine geringe Körpergröße kann die Lebensqualität der Betroffenen beeinträchtigen. Weil krankheitsspezifische Instrumente zur Erfassung der Lebensqualität kleinwüchsiger Kinder und Jugendlicher bisher fehlen, wurde der international entwickelte QoLISSY Fragebogen in einer deutschen Stichprobe psychometrisch überprüft. Der QoLISSY Fragebogen wurde von 69 Kindern und Jugendlichen (8 bis 18 Jahre) mit diagnostiziertem Idiopatischen Kleinwuchs (ISS) oder Wachstumshormonmangel (GHD) ausgefüllt. Es wurden interne Konsistenzen und Test-Retest Reliabilitäten berechnet. Die konvergente Validität wurde über Korrelationen mit dem generischen KIDSCREEN 52 Fragebogen geprüft. Zudem wurden Gruppenunterschiede entsprechend klinischer und soziodemografischer Daten geprüft. Die Reliabilitäten der QoLISSY Skalen und des Gesamtwertes fielen zufriedenstellend aus, mit Cronbachs α von .77 bis .94 und akzeptablen Test-Retest Reliabilitäten (r) von .53 bis .87. Korrelationen mit inhaltlich ähnlichen Konzepten des KIDSCREEN 52 wiesen auf konvergente Validität hin. Mit dem QoLISSY Fragebogen können die subjektiven Auswirkungen des Kleinwuchses auf die gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität der jungen Betroffenen abgebildet werden. Das Instrument ist klinisch für ein präventives Belastungs-Screening, als Outcome-Kriterium in der Therapieforschung und als psychosozialer Indikator in epidemiologischen Studien einsetzbar.

Debate: idiopathic short stature should be treated with growth hormone

In this paper we outline the case for and against the treatment of idiopathic short stature with growth hormone. Drs Ambler and Fairchild argue that many of those with 'idiopathic' short stature are not 'short, normal children' and will ultimately receive molecular diagnoses. They also argue that there is a subset of children who suffer negative psychosocial consequences of their stature for whom growth hormone therapy is effective. Growth hormone has a very good safety record and is likely to be as cost-effective in idiopathic short-stature as in some other conditions that are currently funded. Dr Wilkinson counters that short stature is not associated with physical or psychological illness, and that there is no evidence that growth hormone improves psychological or physical wellbeing. Moreover, growth hormone for idiopathic short stature represents a form of enhancement rather than treatment, and is not a fair use of resources. Socially mediated disadvantage should be treated by attention to prejudice and not by hormone treatment.

Clinical review: Lessons learned from the hGH era

Today, many medical interventions that begin as treatments for disease often expand into therapies that reduce disability, lessen disadvantage, or even confer advantage. Forces that propel profitable drugs, devices, and procedures dominate over considerations of efficient and equitable distribution of resources. This dominance is fueled by industry-physician collaborations often biased by prior assumptions, reliant on surrogate outcomes, and advantageous to marketing. Interventions are justified by "medicalization" of physiologic variations (e.g. short stature) as defects or disease, and nudged into "standard practice" by key opinion leaders. The story below of recombinant human growth hormone (hGH) treatment of short stature is one vivid example, but others (e.g. expansion of drug treatment to "optimize" cholesterol profiles, bone health, psychological well-being) can be found throughout medicine. In the new obesity era, lessons learned from the hGH era will be needed to keep the field of pediatric endocrinology empowered to make the key clinical decisions, and free of unintended consequences for patients and runaway health care inflation for society.

Growth hormone use in children: necessary or designer therapy?

Society often rewards the beautiful, the smart, and the intelligent. The possibility that children with idiopathic short stature (ISS) will sustain psychological damage as a result of ridicule from their peers is a concern. The desire for children to become tall adults provides a difficult quandary for parents and caregivers. Growth hormone (GH) treatment in children requires subcutaneous injections six to seven times weekly. The cost of treating with GH can be more than $52,000, and many third-party payers do not cover the cost of GH treatment. Research to date would indicate that while the administration of GH may improve final adult height in children with ISS, children treated with GH will remain short when compared with peers. More research is needed to study whether the administration of GH is beneficial for children with ISS. This article will discuss ISS and the use of GH in children.

Consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of children with idiopathic short stature: a summary of the Growth Hormone Research Society, the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society, and the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology Workshop

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to summarize important advances in the management of children with idiopathic short stature (ISS).

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were 32 invited leaders in the field.

EVIDENCE

Evidence was obtained by extensive literature review and from clinical experience.

CONSENSUS

Participants reviewed discussion summaries, voted, and reached a majority decision on each document section.

CONCLUSIONS

ISS is defined auxologically by a height below -2 sd score (SDS) without findings of disease as evident by a complete evaluation by a pediatric endocrinologist including stimulated GH levels. Magnetic resonance imaging is not necessary in patients with ISS. ISS may be a risk factor for psychosocial problems, but true psychopathology is rare. In the United States and seven other countries, the regulatory authorities approved GH treatment (at doses up to 53 microg/kg.d) for children shorter than -2.25 SDS, whereas in other countries, lower cutoffs are proposed. Aromatase inhibition increases predicted adult height in males with ISS, but adult-height data are not available. Psychological counseling is worthwhile to consider instead of or as an adjunct to hormone treatment. The predicted height may be inaccurate and is not an absolute criterion for GH treatment decisions. The shorter the child, the more consideration should be given to GH. Successful first-year response to GH treatment includes an increase in height SDS of more than 0.3-0.5. The mean increase in adult height in children with ISS attributable to GH therapy (average duration of 4-7 yr) is 3.5-7.5 cm. Responses are highly variable. IGF-I levels may be helpful in assessing compliance and GH sensitivity; levels that are consistently elevated (>2.5 SDS) should prompt consideration of GH dose reduction. GH therapy for children with ISS has a similar safety profile to other GH indications.

Idiopathic short stature: management and growth hormone treatment

In the management of ISS auxological, biochemical, psychosocial and ethical elements have to be considered. In boys with constitutional delay of growth and puberty androgens are effective in increasing height and sexual characteristics, but adult height is unchanged. GH therapy is efficacious in increasing height velocity and adult height, but the inter-individual variation is considerable. The effect on psychosocial status is uncertain. Factors affecting final height gain include GH dose, height deficit in comparison to midparental height, age and first year height velocity. In case of a low predicted adult height at the onset of puberty, addition of a GnRH analogue can be considered. Although GH therapy appears safe, long-term monitoring is recommended.

The views of young adults and their parents on hormone treatment for short stature in adolescence

AIM

To examine the view of young adults and their parents on growth hormone (GH) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) treatment in adolescence for idiopathic short stature (ISS) or short stature born small for gestational age (SGA).

METHODS

Thirty young adults with ISS or SGA (18 treated, 12 untreated; age 17-23 years; 5.5 years after treatment) completed questionnaires and they and their parents were interviewed.

RESULTS

Self-perceived current psychosocial functioning did not differ between the treated and untreated young adults, but several treated participants perceived psychosocial problems during adolescence. Most treated participants would have chosen again to receive hormone treatment, but they mentioned disadvantages of the treatment and were, as well as untreated participants, reticent upon recommending hormone treatment to others.

CONCLUSION

GH/GnRHa treatment did not appear to have adverse long-term psychosocial consequences and the participants were glad to have taken the opportunity to receive hormone treatment. However, the treated group mentioned several disadvantages of the treatment and perceived some height-related psychosocial problems during adolescence. In considering hormone treatment, the positive as well as the negative aspects of the treatment as perceived by the participants are to be taken into consideration.