1
|
Hank I, Rossiter MD, Finch S. Influence of the 2019 Canada's Food Guide on the Food Environment in Childcare and Early Learning Centres. CAN J DIET PRACT RES 2023; 84:93-97. [PMID: 36866836 DOI: 10.3148/cjdpr-2022-035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated the potential influence of the 2019 Canada's Food Guide (CFG) on the eating environment and food provided in early learning and childcare centres across Canada.Methods: Directors of childcare centres were invited to complete an online survey about their awareness and adoption of the 2019 CFG and submit their menus for analysis.Results: Twenty-five directors completed the survey, and eighteen cycle menus were analyzed. Frequency and the types of foods offered in childcare centres were assessed. Ninety-two percent reported being aware of the changes in the food guide. Many challenges including the lack of support and resources, cost of food, and food reluctance could affect their ability to apply the changes, especially the incorporation of plant-based protein and the uncertainty around the amount of dairy products to provide. Menu analysis indicated frequency of offering items from the various food groups. Vegetables were mostly offered during lunchtime with an average offering rate of 4.83 ± 0.24 times per week.Conclusion: Representatives of early learning and childcare centres identified having difficulties in interpreting and applying the changes in the 2019 CFG. Dietitians have the knowledge and skills required to support childcare centres through training opportunities, workshops, toolkits, and advocacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imene Hank
- Applied Human Sciences, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PEI, Canada
| | - Melissa D Rossiter
- Applied Human Sciences, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PEI, Canada
| | - Sarah Finch
- Applied Human Sciences, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PEI, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lima do Vale MR, Farmer A, Ball GDC, Gokiert R, Maximova K, Thorlakson J. Implementation of Healthy Eating Interventions in Center-Based Childcare: The Selection, Application, and Reporting of Theories, Models, and Frameworks. Am J Health Promot 2020; 34:402-417. [PMID: 31983219 DOI: 10.1177/0890117119895951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the selection, use, and reporting of theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) in implementation studies that promoted healthy eating in center-based childcare. DATA SOURCE We searched 11 databases for articles published between January 1990 and October 2018. We also conducted a hand search of studies and consulted subject matter experts. STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA We included studies in center-based settings for preschoolers that addressed the development, delivery, or evaluation of interventions or implementation strategies related to healthy eating and related subjects and that explicitly used TMF. Exclusion criteria include not peer reviewed or abstracts and not in English, French, German, and Korean. DATA EXTRACTION The first author extracted the data using extraction forms. A second reviewer verified data extraction. DATA SYNTHESIS Direct content analysis and narrative synthesis. RESULTS We identified 8222 references. We retained 38 studies. Study designs included quasi-experimental, randomized controlled trials, surveys, case studies, and others. The criteria used most often for selecting TMFs were description of a change process (n = 12; 23%) or process guidance (n = 8; 15%). Theories, models, and frameworks used targeted different socioecological levels and purposes. The application of TMF constructs (e.g., factors, steps, outcomes) was reported 69% (n = 34) of times. CONCLUSION Reliance on TMFs focused on individual-level, poor TMF selection, and application and reporting for the development of implementation strategies could limit TMF utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Farmer
- Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Geoff D C Ball
- Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Rebecca Gokiert
- Faculty of Extension, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Katerina Maximova
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jessica Thorlakson
- Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vamos CA, Cantor A, Thompson EL, Detman LA, Bronson EA, Phelps A, Louis JM, Gregg AR, Curran JS, Sappenfield WM. The Obstetric Hemorrhage Initiative (OHI) in Florida: The Role of Intervention Characteristics in Influencing Implementation Experiences among Multidisciplinary Hospital Staff. Matern Child Health J 2017; 20:2003-11. [PMID: 27178428 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-016-2020-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Obstetric hemorrhage is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. The Florida Perinatal Quality Collaborative coordinates a state-wide Obstetric Hemorrhage Initiative (OHI) to assist hospitals in implementing best practices related to this preventable condition. This study examined intervention characteristics that influenced the OHI implementation experiences among Florida hospitals. Methods Purposive sampling was employed to recruit diverse hospitals and multidisciplinary staff members. A semi-structured interview guide was developed based on the following constructs from the intervention characteristics domain of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: evidence strength; complexity; adaptability; and packaging. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using Atlas.ti. Results Participants (n = 50) across 12 hospitals agreed that OHI is evidence-based and supported by various information sources (scientific literature, experience, and other epidemiologic or quality improvement data). Participants believed the OHI was 'average' in complexity, with variation depending on participant's role and intervention component. Participants discussed how the OHI is flexible and can be easily adapted and integrated into different hospital settings, policies and resources. The packaging was also found to be valuable in providing materials and supports (e.g., toolkit; webinars; forms; technical assistance) that assisted implementation across activities. Conclusions for Practice Participants reflected positively with regards to the evidence strength, adaptability, and packaging of the OHI. However, the complexity of the initiative adversely affected implementation experiences and required additional efforts to maximize the initiative effectiveness. Findings will inform future efforts to facilitate implementation experiences of evidence-based practices for hemorrhage prevention, ultimately decreasing maternal morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl A Vamos
- Department of Community and Family Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 13201 Bruce B. Downs Blvd. MDC 56, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. .,The Chiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 3111 E. Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA.
| | - Allison Cantor
- Department of Community and Family Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 13201 Bruce B. Downs Blvd. MDC 56, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Erika L Thompson
- Department of Community and Family Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 13201 Bruce B. Downs Blvd. MDC 56, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.,The Chiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 3111 E. Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Linda A Detman
- Department of Community and Family Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 13201 Bruce B. Downs Blvd. MDC 56, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.,The Chiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 3111 E. Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA.,Florida Perinatal Quality Collaborative, The Chiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 3111 E. Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Emily A Bronson
- The Chiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 3111 E. Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA.,Florida Perinatal Quality Collaborative, The Chiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 3111 E. Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Annette Phelps
- Florida Perinatal Quality Collaborative, The Chiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 3111 E. Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Judette M Louis
- Florida Perinatal Quality Collaborative, The Chiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 3111 E. Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, 2 Tampa General Circle, STC, 6th Floor, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA
| | - Anthony R Gregg
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, P.O Box 100294, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - John S Curran
- Florida Perinatal Quality Collaborative, The Chiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 3111 E. Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA.,Faculty and Academic Affairs, USF Health, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - William M Sappenfield
- Department of Community and Family Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 13201 Bruce B. Downs Blvd. MDC 56, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.,The Chiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 3111 E. Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA.,Florida Perinatal Quality Collaborative, The Chiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 3111 E. Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nikolopoulos H, Mayan M, MacIsaac J, Miller T, Bell RC. Women's perceptions of discussions about gestational weight gain with health care providers during pregnancy and postpartum: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17:97. [PMID: 28335749 PMCID: PMC5364680 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1257-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2016] [Accepted: 02/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Maternal body weight is an indicator of the health of a mother and her developing fetus. Risks of poor maternal and fetal health issues increase when women gain too little or too much weight during pregnancy. A study of 600 women from Alberta, Canada, reported approximately 30, 46, 80, and 80% of underweight, healthy weight, overweight, and obese women, respectively, gained in excess of Health Canada gestational weight gain guidelines. Behavioural interventions during pregnancy have shown to be effective at supporting women achieve gestational weight gain (GWG) recommendations and return to their pre-pregnancy weight postpartum, yet few women are counseled about weight gain during pregnancy. A discrepancy exists between health care providers’ (HCP) reported counseling behaviours and women’s perceptions of counseling by HCPs; most HCPs report counseling women about GWG; conversely, most women report not receiving counseling about GWG. This study explored women’s experiences with GWG and their perceptions of discussions about GWG with HCPs during pregnancy and postpartum. This will help to identify gaps in service delivery and highlight areas for improvement that may better support women to achieve GWG recommendations leading to better health outcomes for women and children. Methods Five focus groups (n = 26) were conducted with women up to 1 year postpartum across the five Alberta health zones. Focus groups were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results GWG is important to women, for their health and for the health of their baby. In-depth conversations with HCPs about GWG or weight loss do not occur; however, women want the opportunity to discuss weight gain/loss with HCPs. Women would like discussions about gestational weight gain/loss to become part of standard care and offered to all women. Conclusions Women suggested that discussions about GWG should occur with all women, and that HCPs should initiate these discussions by asking women how they feel about discussing weight. Conversations should begin early on in pregnancy and continue through to the postpartum period. Interventions assessing discussions about GWG should be implemented and evaluated as this has been identified as a gap in prenatal service delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hara Nikolopoulos
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Alberta, 4-126 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada
| | - Maria Mayan
- University of Alberta, Community University Partnership, Facility of Extension, 2nd Floor, 2-281 Enterprise Square, 10230 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T5J 4P6, Canada
| | - Jessica MacIsaac
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Alberta, 4-126 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada
| | - Terri Miller
- Healthy Living, Population, Public and Aboriginal Health, Reproductive Health, Healthy Children and Families, Alberta Health Services, 10101 Southport Road SW cubicle #1740, Calgary, AB, T2W 3N2, Canada
| | - Rhonda C Bell
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Alberta, 4-126 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|