Effect of a 0.05% neutral NaF mouthrinse on coronal and root caries of adults

Topical Fluoride to Prevent Root Caries: Systematic Review with Network Meta-analysis

The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to summarize the direct and indirect clinical evidence on the effectiveness of professionally applied and self-applied topical fluorides in preventing dental root caries. Controlled clinical trials with any follow-up duration were included. MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched. Two reviewers independently carried out the selection of studies, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and assessment of the certainty in the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Fixed effects model and frequentist approach were used in the network meta-analyses. Nine clinical trials involving 4,030 participants were included. Five professionally applied and 7 self-applied topical fluoride agents or combinations were included in the meta-analyses. Compared to control group, 38% silver diamine fluoride solution, 5% sodium fluoride varnish, and 1.2% acidulated phosphate fluoride reduced root caries increment after 2 y (ranging from 0.59 to 0.85 mean decayed or filled root [DF-root]). Fluoride mouth rinse and fluoride toothpaste, used alone or in combination, reduced root caries increment after 1 y (ranging from 0.29 to 1.90 mean DF-root). Among the professionally applied topical fluorides reviewed, an annually applied 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) solution combined with oral health education is most likely to be the most effective in preventing dental root caries. Among the reviewed self-applied topical fluoride methods, daily use of a 0.2% sodium fluoride (NaF) mouth rinse is most likely to be the most effective, followed by 1100 ppm to 1500 ppm fluoride toothpaste plus 0.05% NaF mouth rinse, and 1100 ppm to 1500 ppm fluoride toothpaste.

Mouthwashes: Do They Work and Should We Use Them? Part 2: Anticaries, Antihalitosis and Dry Mouth Relief Efficacy of Mouthwashes

This article will review the anticaries, antihalitosis and dry mouth relief efficacy of mouthwashes. Fluoride mouthwashes may provide an additional benefit to toothpaste and gel in children with a high risk of dental caries, but toothpaste alone may be a more acceptable mode of delivery. There may be a beneficial effect of fluoride mouthwashes on caries levels in older adults, particularly those at higher risk of root caries. The available data of the antihalitosis effect of mouthwashes neither supports nor contra-indicates their use. The key area where a mouthwash may be of use in the treatment of patients with a dry mouth is through the anticaries effect of fluoride. Clinical relevance: The evidence supporting the use of anticaries, antihalitosis and dry mouth relief mouthwashes is evaluated. This provides guidance for dentists and dental care professionals of when it is appropriate to recommend the use of a mouthwash in these situations.

Systematic review on noninvasive treatment of root caries lesions

The present systematic review critically summarizes results of clinical studies investigating chemical agents to reduce initiation or inactivation of root caries lesions (RCLs). Outcomes were DMFRS/DFRS (decayed, missing, filled root surfaces), surface texture (hard/soft), and/or RCI (root caries index). Three electronic databases were screened for studies from 1947 to 2014. Cross-referencing was used to further identify articles. Article selection and data abstraction were done in duplicate. Languages were restricted to English and German. Mean differences (MD) were calculated for changes in DMFRS/DFRS. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated for changes in surface texture and RCI in a random effects model. Thirty-four articles with 1 or more agents were included; they reported 30 studies with 10,136 patients who were 20 to 101 y old; and they analyzed 28 chemical agents (alone or in combination). Eleven studies investigated dentifrices, 10 rinses, 8 varnishes, 3 solutions, 3 gels, and 2 ozone applications. Meta-analyses revealed that dentifrices containing 5,000 ppm F(-) (RR = 0.49; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.42, 0.57; high level of evidence) or 1.5% arginine plus 1,450 ppm F(-) (RR = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.64, 0.98; very low level) are more effective in inactivating RCLs than dentifrices containing 1,100 to 1,450 ppm F(-). Self-applied AmF/SnF2-containing dentifrice and rinse decreased the initiation of RCLs when compared with NaF products (standardized MD = 0.15; 95% CI = -0.22, 0.52; low level). Patients rinsing with a mouth rinse containing 225 to 900 ppm F(-) revealed a significantly reduced DMFRS/DFRS (MD = -0.18; 95% CI = -0.35, -0.01; low level) when compared with a placebo rinse. Significantly reduced RCI was found for CHX (MD = -0.67; 95% CI = -1.01, -0.32; very low level) as well as SDF (MD = -0.33; 95% CI = -0.39, -0.28; very low level) when compared with placebo varnish. Regular use of dentifrices containing 5,000 ppm F(-) and quarterly professionally applied CHX or SDF varnishes seem to be efficacious to decrease progression and initiation of root caries, respectively. However, this conclusion is based on only very few well-conducted randomized controlled trials.

Prevention of root caries: a literature review of primary and secondary preventive agents

PURPOSE

This literature review summarizes the effectiveness of the seven leading root caries preventive agents and provides recommendations for use of those agents in clinical practice with older adults and vulnerable elderly.

METHOD

Studies were eligible if they assessed the effectiveness of either fluoride, chlorhexidine, xylitol, amorphous calcium phosphate, sealants, saliva stimulators, or silver diamine fluoride to prevent/control root caries in an English language articles between 1979 and 2010.

RESULTS

In the 31 eligible studies, the most effective primary (1°) prevention agents had reductions in RC incidence ranging from 72% to nearly 200% as compared to a placebo while for secondary (2°) prevention, the best agents demonstrated arrest rates between 67 and 80%.

CONCLUSION

For 1° prevention of root caries the recommended "best choice" is a 38% Silver Diamine Fluoride solution professionally applied annually, while for the 2° prevention of root caries, the recommended "best choice" is a 22,500 ppm Sodium Fluoride varnish professionally applied every 3 months.

Effectiveness of fluoride in preventing caries in adults

To date, no systematic reviews have found fluoride to be effective in preventing dental caries in adults. The objective of this meta-analysis was to examine the effectiveness of self- and professionally applied fluoride and water fluoridation among adults. We used a random-effects model to estimate the effect size of fluoride (absolute difference in annual caries increment or relative risk ratio) for all adults aged 20+ years and for adults aged 40+ years. Twenty studies were included in the final body of evidence. Among studies published after/during 1980, any fluoride (self- and professionally applied or water fluoridation) annually averted 0.29 (95%CI: 0.16-0.42) carious coronal and 0.22 (95%CI: 0.08-0.37) carious root surfaces. The prevented fraction for water fluoridation was 27% (95%CI: 19%-34%). These findings suggest that fluoride prevents caries among adults of all ages.

Dental caries in older adults

Dental caries is one of the most significant health problems facing older adults. More than half of the elderly who are dentate are affected with either coronal or root caries, and caries is the primary cause of tooth loss in this population. New materials and techniques are emerging to help with geriatric preventive and restorative needs, but ongoing vigilance for caries will be required in this population, which is experiencing increased longevity and tooth retention.

Oral hygiene care for adults with dementia in residential aged care facilities

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review was to report on the best available evidence relating to oral hygiene for adults with dementia in residential aged care facilities, including: INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review considered any randomised or non-randomised controlled studies, cohort studies, case-control studies, multiple time series studies, uncontrolled studies, descriptive studies and opinions of respected authorities (including theses and other publications) related to residents with dementia living in residential aged care facilities in Australia and overseas; community-dwelling adults with dementia; and special needs adult populations (for preventive oral hygiene care strategies and interventions).The review considered studies and publications designed to:1 quantify the oral health status of older adults living in residential aged care facilities;2 quantify the oral health status of adults with dementia living in the community and in residential aged care facilities;3 evaluate tools used to assess the oral health of residents by staff and carers working in residential aged care facilities;4 evaluate preventive oral hygiene care strategies and interventions used in special needs adult populations (including adults with dementia); and5 evaluate oral health care training and oral hygiene care provision, staff and carers working in residential aged care facilities.Dental outcome measures of interest were those relating to the prevalence, incidence, experiences and increments of oral diseases and conditions including: denture problems, coronal and root caries, periodontal diseases (plaque accumulation, gingivitis, loss-of-attachment), oral mucosal conditions, xerostomia and salivary gland hypofunction, tooth loss, difficulty chewing, behavioural problems and pain/discomfort. Related characteristics and outcomes of interest included: medical conditions, medications, cognitive status, functional status, nutritional status and sociodemographics.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The aim of the search was to locate relevant English-language studies and publications appearing between 1980 and 2002. The search utilised a two-step approach, involving an initial search of electronic databases using combinations of key words followed by a second extensive search carried out using the identified key words. This was supplemented with a secondary search of the references cited in the identified studies. Electronic database searched were: Cinahl, Embase, Psycinfo, Medline and Current Contents.

METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY

All selected studies were critically appraised by two reviewers prior to inclusion in the review.

RESULTS

In regards to relevance, incidence, experiences, and increments of oral diseases and conditions, possible risk factors identified included: saliva dysfunction, polypharmacy, comorbid medical conditions, swallowing and dietary problems, increased functional dependence, need for assistance with oral hygiene care, and poor access and utilisation of dental care.Evidence on the use of assessment tools by carers to evaluate residents' oral health showed that successful assessment of residents with and without dementia by nursing staff requires appropriate staff training by a dental professional. Coupled with appropriate training, an oral assessment screening tool designed for residents with dementia has been successfully used by nursing and care staff to identify residents requiring further review by dental professionals. Expert opinion in the field indicates that oral assessment screenings by a staff member and then by a dentist would ideally be undertaken upon admission to a facility, and regularly thereafter by staff and/or dentists as required.Clinicians and researchers suggested that oral hygiene care strategies to prevent oral diseases and conditions were found to be effective in preventing oral diseases, and thus are relevant for use in the resident with dementia.In regards to the provision of dental treatment and ongoing management of oral diseases and conditions, the use of adjunctive and preventive aids were found to be effective when introduced in conjunction with a staff training program:Expert opinion suggests that behaviour management techniques will increase the potential of performing oral hygiene care interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that the training of staff in the form of a comprehensive practically oriented program addressing areas such as oral diseases, oral screening assessment, and hands-on demonstration of oral hygiene techniques and products is likely to have a positive impact on the management of oral hygiene care within residential aged care facilities. The review also identified that regular brushing with fluoride toothpaste, use of therapeutic fluoride products and application of therapeutic chlorhexidine gluconate products are validated by research as effective for the general population and some populations with special needs.

The rational use of oral care products in the elderly

This review examines the evidence of the effectiveness of oral care products in preventing and controlling dental caries and periodontal disease in the ageing population. The strength of evidence is indicated using the following hierarchy: Type 1 (systematic reviews), Type 2 (randomised controlled trials), Type 3 (observational studies) and Type 4 (traditional reviews). Most of the evidence to support the effectiveness of fluoride products is extrapolated from studies involving children and adolescents. The few studies that have been performed in older adults suggest that fluoride toothpaste and, in the case of high caries risk individuals, the adjunctive use of other fluoride delivery systems, may be effective in preventing coronal and root caries. Some dentifrices containing triclosan have been shown to improve plaque control and gingival health and one, which contains triclosan/copolymer, reduces the progression of periodontitis in adults and high-risk individuals. Powered toothbrushes with an oscillation-rotation action are more effective in reducing plaque and improving gingival health than manual toothbrushes.

Treating root-surface caries

This article summarizes the effectiveness of restorative materials used to restore root surfaces, the mechanisms by which these materials reduce caries, and placement techniques for restoring root-surface lesions. Patients may be classified into low, medium, and high caries risk groups for root caries, and specific dental restorative material recommendations are made for each category. Effective plaque control, xylitol-containing chewing gums, antimicrobial agents, fluoride-releasing restorative materials, topically applied fluoride, and fluoride-containing toothpastes provide maximum protection for the high caries risk patient.

The effectiveness of 10% chlorhexidine varnish treatment on dental caries incidence in adults with dry mouth

OBJECTIVES

This study compared a 10% chlorhexidine varnish treatment with placebo and sham treatments for preventing dental caries in adult patients with xerostomia (dry mouth).

DESIGN

The study was a multicentred, randomized, parallel group, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

SETTING

All examinations and procedures were performed at Tuft's University, Boston, MA, the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC or the University of Western Ontario, London, ON.

SUBJECTS

Subjects were adults with recent or current dental caries experience, high salivary levels of cariogenic microorganisms and low salivary flow rates.

RESULTS

236 subjects completed at least one post-treatment examination. There were 697 new carious lesions diagnosed, 446 (64%) located on coronal surfaces and 251 (36%) located on root surfaces. The mean attack rate was 0.23 surfaces/100 surfaces at risk. A treatment difference observed between the Active and Placebo groups was statistically significant for root caries increment (p = .02) and total caries increment (p = .03). A treatment difference observed between the Active and Sham groups was not statistically significant for coronal, root or total caries increment. Analysis of variance of treatment group differences was performed using mutans streptococci counts, salivary flow rates, age, sex, caries prevalence, medications, time to first event and early withdrawal as co-variables. These factors did not meaningfully alter the findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The difference between the 10% chlorhexidine varnish and placebo treatments is considered to be highly clinically significant for root caries increment (41% reduction) and for total caries increment (25% reduction) but only for coronal caries increment (14%).

A comparison of four home-care fluoride programs on the caries incidence in the elderly

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the caries preventive effect of 4 fluoride programs over 2 years in the elderly.

SETTING

The Public Dental Clinics of Bålsta and Knivsta and the Faculty of Odontology in Göteborg, Sweden.

SUBJECTS

One hundred and sixty-four individuals, aged 60 years and older (mean age 71.5 years) who were considered to be at risk from caries.

DESIGN

The participants were randomly assigned either to: 1) rinse twice a day with a 0.05% NaF solution (n = 49; rinsing group), 2) suck twice a day on a 1.66 mg NaF tablet (n = 51; tablet group), 3) brush their teeth three times a day using a toothpaste slurry rinsing technique (n = 32; slurry group), or 4) brush their teeth in their usual manner (n = 32; control group). The participants in all 4 groups used a fluoride toothpaste (containing 0.32% NaF) at least twice daily.

RESULTS

No new carious lesions were found in 67% of the participants in the rinsing, 43% in the tablet, 25% in the slurry and 16% in the control group over the 2 years. The mean (+/- SD) 2-year caries increment was 0.8 +/- 1.4, 1.4 +/- 1.7, 1.9 +/- 1.9 and 2.3 +/- 2.1 DFS in the rinsing, tablet, slurry and control groups, respectively; it was significantly lower in the rinsing than in the control group (p < 0.01). A lower incidence of DFS was also found in the tablet group than in the slurry group, but only for the lingual surfaces (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The type of fluoride program may be of importance in the reduction of new caries lesions in an older population.

Arrest of root surface caries in situ

This study tests the hypothesis that daily oral hygiene combined with topical fluoride arrests active root-surface caries lesions without changing the mineral content of the lesions. Therefore, changes in mineral content and distribution were studied in root surfaces during caries lesion development and subsequent arrest of lesion progression in situ. In 18 subjects, lesions were developed during 3 months in sound root-surface specimens inserted into lower partial dentures. After 3 months, ground sections were prepared from each lesion prior to re-insertion of the specimens into the dentures. In addition, one sound root specimen was added per subject. During the following 3 months, half of the subjects cleaned both sound and carious specimens once a day with an 1100-ppm fluoride toothpaste, and the specimens were treated twice with 2% NaF for 2 min in situ. The other half of the subjects continued the experiment without cleaning. During the initial three-month period, all specimens developed subsurface lesions extending 187 to 583 microm into the dentin. Lesion depth increased somewhat in both experimental groups during the following 3 months (P > or = 0.1). There was a non-significant increase in mineral loss in the plaque-covered specimens (P = 0.08). However, the total mineral content of specimens subjected to plaque removal and topical fluoride did not change. This treatment resulted in an increased mineral content in the surface layer (P < 0.01) and formation of a zone of higher mineral content within the body of the lesion. The sound root surfaces which had been cleaned for a three-month period showed mineral uptake in the surface layer, occasionally associated with subsurface demineralization extending 20 to 70 microm into the tissue. The mineral loss of these specimens was significantly smaller than that of plaque-covered surfaces (P < 0.001). It is concluded that daily plaque removal and topical fluoride use influence the distribution of mineral in sound and carious root surfaces and may arrest lesion progression without affecting the total mineral content.

The caries-preventive effect of titanium tetrafluoride on root surfaces in situ as evaluated by microradiography and confocal laser scanning microscopy

The aim of the present study was to investigate the cariostatic effect of titanium tetrafluoride (TiF4) on in situ-induced lesions on human root surfaces. Analysis of the samples was carried out by quantitative microradiography (TMR) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Pre-molar roots, sectioned into four pieces, were used for sample preparation. Before they were mounted into the recesses prepared in the acrylic intra-oral appliances, two root pieces from each tooth were treated with 4% TiF4 for 1 min, while the remaining two pieces served as controls. The appliances were worn by 12 volunteers for 4 wks. After 4 wks with no fluoride supplementation, the root pieces were removed and analyzed by TMR and CLSM. The TMR results showed that the TiF4 treatment reduced lesion depth and total mineral loss by 56% and 62%, respectively. CLSM images agreed well with the TMR measurements. A dense light-reflecting surface layer with almost intact subsurface structures was evident in the TiF4-treated samples.

Fluoride profiles in the cementum and root dentine of human permanent anterior teeth extracted from adult residents in a naturally fluoridated and a non-fluoridated area

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of water fluoride concentration on the fluoride profile across the entire thickness of the cementum and root dentine of human permanent anterior teeth in adults.

SUBJECTS

Twenty-eight human permanent anterior teeth from individuals aged from 30 to over 60 years were studied.

SETTING

Teeth were obtained from a natural high-fluoride area (West Hartle-pool, UK; 1.0-1.3 ppm F in drinking water, WHP) and the other from a non-fluoridated naturally low fluoride area (Leeds, UK; 0.1 ppm F in drinking water, LDS).

DESIGN

Cementum and root dentine were sampled using an abrasive micro-sampling technique from the cementum surface to the pulpal surface of root dentine.

RESULTS

Fluoride concentration was higher in tooth roots (the cementum and dentine) taken from the naturally fluoridated area (WHP) than from the non-fluoridated area (LDS). Age and average fluoride concentration showed a positive correlation in WHP dentine, middle region of the root (r = 0.78, P < 0.001) and in the apical region of the root (r = 0.61, P < 0.05). WHP cementum had the strongest fluoride concentration correlation with age in the cervical region of the root (r = 0.67, P < 0.01). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the area (water fluoride content), age and number of years lived in the area combined with total age were significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The fluoride content of cementum and root dentine in adult residents is related to fluoride content in drinking water.

Incidence of root caries in an older Canadian population

This paper reports the results of a longitudinal study of Canadians aged 50 years and over which was designed to estimate the three-year incidence of root caries. At baseline, 699 randomly selected dentate subjects were clinically examined and 493 were examined again after three years. Over this period 27.4% had one or more root DFS increments and the mean DFS increment was 0.6 per person. Because DFS increments overstate root caries incidence DS increments were also calculated. Relatively few baseline variables were associated with either DFS or DS increments. In logistic regression analyses, age was the only variable associated with one or more root DFS increments, while age, dental visiting pattern and wearing a partial denture were associated with one or more root DS increments. In both cases, the predictive power of the models was poor but improved marginally when baseline root caries experience was also entered as an independent variable.

Three-year root caries incidence and risk modeling in older adults in North Carolina

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to describe the incidence of root caries and to identify its risk factors in a representative sample of older adults.

METHODS

Root caries incidence was estimated and multivariate risk assessment models were developed to identify predictors for root caries in a three-year follow-up study of 234 black and 218 white noninstitutionalized adults aged 65 and older residing in North Carolina.

RESULTS

During the observation period, 29 percent of blacks developed root caries, compared to 39 percent of whites (P < .05). The mean net DFS increment per person was 0.55 +/- 0.13 root surfaces for blacks vs 0.80 +/- 0.21 for whites (P > .32). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that blacks wearing a partial denture, having some root fragments, having an average gingival recession > or = 2 mm, and being free of P. intermedia were at greater risk for developing new root caries. The model for whites showed that retired people with their most severe gingival recession > or = 4 mm, an average probing pocket depth > or = 2 mm, and taking antihistamines were more likely to develop new lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that older blacks had less risk of root caries than whites, and in both groups indicators of poor periodontal status increased the risk of root caries.

The effectiveness of sponge-type intraoral applicators for applying topical fluorides in institutionalized older adults

Many older adults who reside in nursing homes have disabilities which limit their capacity to benefit from the usual protocols for prevention of dental caries. This is a report of a study of the effectiveness of an alternative method of applying topical fluoride in the institutionalized elderly. Fluoride gel (1.1% NaF) was applied to the facial tooth surfaces of 10 elderly nursing home residents using a sponge-type intraoral applicator (IA). Subsequently, the same subjects rinsed with a commercial fluoride solution (0.05% NaF). Salivary fluoride levels were then assessed by the Taves (1968) method. The IA with fluoride produced significantly higher salivary fluoride levels over a period of three hours compared with rinsing.

Prevention of root surface caries using a dental adhesive

Dental adhesives might be applied as sealants to exposed root surfaces to prevent root caries. One resin adhesive system significantly reduced the incidence and severity of lesions in an artificial caries system.

Root caries incidence and associated risk factors in middle-aged and older adults

Data from population-based longitudinal studies required to assess the incidence of root caries and associated risk factors are sparse in the literature. To this end, a group of 130 middle-aged and older adults were examined for root caries at baseline and at a follow-up visit between nine and 24 months (median: 16 months). Dental examinations were conducted by one examiner at a Tufts dental clinic using NIDR defined diagnostic criteria. Fifty percent of subjects in this study population developed one or more new root caries lesions over the follow-up period. Also, an annualised increment of 0.60 (SD: 0.72) decayed and filled surfaces per person was observed for the 45-59 year old group while the 70+ group showed an annualised increment of 1.38 (SD: 1.97) DFS in this study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified past root caries experience, high plaque score, and high number of teeth (> = 22) to be positively associated with new root caries (p < 0.05).

The epidemiology of root surface caries: North American studies

After some problems resulting from the lack of standardized methods in the conduct of root caries studies and the lack of standardized reports of findings are reviewed, the prevalence and incidence of root surface caries in North America are reviewed through a combination of epidemiologic studies and large clinical trials. As part of this review, the available evidence on the relationship between root caries and missing teeth is presented. These data lead to the conclusion that the prevalence and, to some extent, the incidence of root caries are underestimated in adults with missing teeth. This review resulted in a number of observations regarding the status of root caries as an oral health problem. First, there is little evidence that would allow conclusions regarding the secular increase or decrease in the prevalence or incidence of root caries to be drawn. Other observations gleaned include the remarkably similar prevalence and incidence rates obtained from the studies reviewed, positive associations between root caries and age, negative associations between the prevalence and incidence of root caries and consumption of water containing fluoride, indications that root caries is a problem in adults with incidence rates that approach caries rates in children, and associations between the prevalence and incidence of root caries and a wide variety of oral, behavioral, and medical conditions. The final observation is the need for the acceptance of conventions for the definition of root caries as well as the reporting of findings in order for more firm conclusions to be drawn from future studies.

Root caries in Scandinavia in the 1980's and future trends to be expected in dental caries experience in adults

The large variety of diagnostic criteria used adds some uncertainty to comparisons of recent clinical and epidemiological data on root caries in Scandinavia. Nevertheless, it is apparent that the prevalence of frank carious cavities on the root among 60(+)-year-olds is about 30-40%. When inactive and recurrent lesions and fillings are included, the prevalence is almost 100% in 60(+)-year-olds. At this age, the mean number of root surface fillings is about 7, and the mean number of active caries lesions ranges from 0.9 to 3.4. The degree of gingival recession does not appear to be a direct measure of root caries risk in a population. When the number of teeth at risk is accounted for, the age-dependent increase in prevalence of root caries is very weak. Therefore, comparisons of root caries prevalence between populations are meaningful only when information on number of teeth present and teeth at risk is also available. Recent studies from various parts of the world have demonstrated that caries is ubiquitous in all populations and that caries progression continues throughout life. The impact of this on trends in prevalence and incidence of dental caries in adults is discussed in the light of what is known about the natural history of dental caries.

Fluoride retention in dentin after topical application of aminefluoride

The retention of KOH-soluble and structurally bound fluoride in dentin after topical application of aminefluoride was investigated. One cylindrical dentin sample was prepared from each of 40 extracted third molars. All samples received one topical application of 1 microL of aminefluoride solution (1.23% F) for three min. Ten of them were analyzed immediately after fluoridation. The remaining 30 samples were mounted in the buccal aspects of a special mouth application which was carried by a person for five days. After one, three, and five days, 10 of the 30 samples were removed from the appliance. In all samples, the amount of structurally bound fluoride was determined in three layers (20 microns, 20 microns, 20 microns) by use of a special grinding technique. Before each grinding step, the dentin specimens were analyzed for KOH-soluble fluoride. The total amount of KOH-soluble fluoride in dentin was 48.7 +/- 14 micrograms/cm2. It decreased drastically during the experimental period. Structurally-bound fluoride increased one day after fluoridation in the first and second layers. Thus, topical application of aminefluoride resulted in a significant accumulation of KOH-soluble fluoride in dentin. This precipitate was unstable, but fluoride ions released from it could perhaps increase the amount of structurally bound fluoride.

A critique of topical fluoride methods (dentifrices, mouthrinses, operator-, and self-applied gels) in an era of decreased caries and increased fluorosis prevalence

Within the last 20 years there has been a decrease in the caries prevalence of US schoolchildren, a change in the intraoral caries pattern, and a slowing of the progress of lesions. Simultaneously, the prevalence of enamel milder, cosmetically acceptable forms and is more noticeable in fluoride-deficient communities than those with optimal or above-optimal water fluoride concentrations. Circumstantial evidence indicates that a principal contributor to the caries decline is the extensive use of fluoride dentifrices. Conversely, although use of a fluoride dentifrice can add to the total daily amount of ingested fluoride in preschool children, there is little evidence to suggest that dentifrice ingestion is a principal factor causing the fluorosis increase. The value of fluoride methods may be assessed in relative or absolute terms. The relative, or percentage, caries reduction attributed to fluoride mouthrinses and gels appears to be a property intrinsic to the methods themselves and generally is little affected by the caries activity of the population being treated. Conversely, the absolute, or numerical, caries reduction is dependent upon the level of disease in the population. Thus, the reported caries decline reduces the number of surfaces prevented from developing caries, even though the percentage reduction remains substantially unchanged. Although inadvertent ingestion of fluoride can result from the use of mouthrinses and gels, there is little evidence to suggest that they have contributed to the fluorosis increase. When using topical methods, prudence should prevail to avoid ingestion of fluoride. Fluoride dentifrices should continue to be used routinely, and although lower potency dentifrices may be considered, the literature does not provide strong support for their need. Use of fluoride mouthrinses and gels for individual patients should be predicted upon their caries activity or risk. Use of these methods in public health programs is a matter of cost-effectiveness, which will be influenced by the caries prevalence of the target population.

Effects of fluoride and chlorhexidine on the microflora of dental root surfaces and progression of root-surface caries

The effects of fluoride and chlorhexidine varnishes on the microflora of dental root surfaces and on the progression of root-surface caries were studied. Forty-four patients, surgically treated for advanced periodontal disease, were distributed at random among three groups. All patients received a standardized preventive treatment. Furthermore, the dentition of the patients in the two experimental groups was treated, at three-month intervals, with chlorhexidine and fluoride varnish, respectively. Patients in the control group received no additional treatment. In the experimental groups, plaque samples were collected from selected sound and carious root surfaces at baseline and at three, six, and nine months after the onset of the study. The presence of root-surface caries was scored at baseline and after one year. In addition, the texture, depth, and color of the root-surface lesions were monitored. Mutans streptococci on root surfaces were suppressed significantly (p less than 0.05) during the whole experimental period in the chlorhexidine varnish group, but not in the fluoride varnish group. A non-significant increase in the number of Actinomyces viscosus/naeslundii was noted after treatment with chlorhexidine and fluoride varnish. The increase in the number of decayed and filled root surfaces after one year was significantly lower in the experimental groups than in the control group. After treatment with chlorhexidine varnish, significantly more initial root-surface lesions had hardened than in the other groups.

The epidemiology of root surface caries

Although a secular decline is being seen in coronal caries in children in industrialized countries, there appears to be a relatively high prevalence of root caries, with chronologically older adults exhibiting the highest prevalences. This paper reviews the descriptive and analytical epidemiology of root caries as found in recent national, regional, and local studies. A review of the variety of study designs, populations surveyed, and epidemiologic criteria for root caries comprising recent studies is presented as a background for comparison of prevalence rates which range from 7.3% to 69.7% of the population with root decay. In the few incidence studies reported, attack rates range from 1.6 surfaces per 100 surfaces at risk to 6.3 per 1000 surface-months at risk. Risk indicators for root caries are also reviewed with studies applying multivariate techniques implicating age, fluoride, educational level, use of dental services, coronal caries, loss of attachment, and number of teeth as possible risk factors. Although incidence studies have isolated risk factors, the small number of studies result in little agreement. Risk factor models from the Iowa 65+ Oral Health Study and a Risk Indicator model from the Piedmont 65+ Dental Study are presented to illustrate the variety of factors that may be involved in the expression of root surface caries in human populations.

Effectiveness of mouthrinsing with fluoride solutions in preventing coronal and root caries

Fluoride mouthrinses have been used extensively for the past 15 years to prevent dental caries in children. Their use has been especially widespread in organized school-based programs in the US. Nearly three dozen clinical studies of fluoride mouthrinses, both with and without placebo controls, have been reported in the literature since the early 1960s. The overwhelming majority of those studies report statistically significant caries inhibition from the use of the products. Most of the studies were published prior to the knowledge of a decline in caries prevalence during the past 30 years. Consequently, the results of those studies lacking a placebo control group have been challenged. Even randomized clinical trials with appropriate control groups appear to be reporting declining differences between test and control groups. Using a model based on annual caries increments from published studies, the conclusion is reached that future use of fluoride mouthrinses is unlikely to result in annual savings in DMF increment greater than 0.4 surfaces, regardless of age of rinsers.

The effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants

This review addresses two major issues related to the use of pit and fissure sealants. First, the epidemiology of occlusal caries for children and adults is examined to determine if there is a basis for administering sealant programs to different age groups. Second, the effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants in fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities is compared. Changes in effectiveness of sealant over time are evaluated in terms of percent effectiveness, complete retention, caries incidence, and reapplication rates. Based on epidemiologic evidence, sealant programs can be justified for children and young adults, but not for older age groups. Based on the literature reviewed, following one application of autopolymerized or visible-light-cured sealant, the median percent effectiveness declines from 83 percent after one year to 55 percent after seven years. Similarly, the median complete retention declines from 92 percent after one year to 66 percent after seven years. Conversely, the median percent of sealed first molars becoming carious and/or restored increases from 4 percent after one year to 31 percent after seven years. Large differences in sealant effectiveness are not apparent between studies performed in fluoridated and fluoride-deficient communities.

Three-year root caries increments: implications for clinical trials

Seven hundred and ninety-six adult subjects (mean age, 39.9 years) received visual-tactile examinations for root caries over a three-year period. All subjects were employed or were the spouses of employees and resided in fluoride-deficient communities on Long Island, New York. During the three-year observation period, 81.4 percent of the subjects did not develop root caries. The 18.6 percent who developed root caries averaged 0.8 DFS/year. The subjects' ages and baseline root DFS status were associated with the development of a root DFS increment. The older the patient, especially aged 45 and older, the greater was the risk of developing root lesions or having root fillings placed. Subjects who had a root DFS score at baseline also were more likely to experience a root DFS increment. It is recommended that when designing clinical trials of agents purported to inhibit root caries, preselection criteria for the study population should consider the subjects' ages and past history of root lesions.

Three-year root caries increments: an analysis of teeth and surfaces at risk

Seven hundred and ninety-six adult subjects (mean age 39.9 years) received visual-tactile examinations for root caries over a three-year period. All subjects were employed or the spouses of employees and resided in fluoride-deficient communities on Long Island, New York. Incremental caries data were analyzed to provide descriptive information about the susceptibility of individual teeth and surfaces to root caries. Molars were most prone to root caries/fillings, followed in decreasing order by premolars, canines and incisors. While canines and incisors had a nearly identical increment, since there are half as many canines as incisors in a mouth, canines are actually twice as susceptible to root caries/fillings. Facial surfaces comprised 53 percent of the increment followed by distal, lingual and mesial surfaces. Approximately 70 percent of the DFS for facial and lingual surfaces were fillings, compared to approximately 50 percent for mesial and distal surfaces, suggesting that part of the increment for facial-lingual surfaces may be treated abrasion areas rather than caries.