Post-operative pain following coblation or monopolar electrocautery tonsillectomy in children: a prospective, single-blinded, randomised comparison

Postoperative Morbidity of Different Tonsillectomy Techniques: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare different tonsillectomy techniques in terms of postoperative bleeding incidence and postoperative pain.

METHODS

An arm-based network analysis was conducted using a Bayesian hierarchical model. The primary and secondary outcomes were postoperative bleeding incidence and mean postoperative pain score.

RESULTS

A total of 6464 patients were included for five different interventions (cold dissection tonsillectomy; extracapsular coblation tonsillectomy; intracapsular coblation tonsillectomy [ICT]; bipolar diathermy tonsillectomy [BDT]; monopolar diathermy tonsillectomy). ICT showed the lowest absolute risk (4.44%) of postoperative bleeding incidence (73.31% chance of ranking first) and the lowest mean postoperative pain score (1.74 ± 0.68) with a 94.0% chance of ranking first, whereas BDT showed both the highest absolute risk of bleeding incidence (10.75%) and the highest mean postoperative pain score (5.67 ± 1.43).

CONCLUSIONS

ICT seems to offer better postoperative outcomes, in terms of reduced risk of bleeding and reduced pain. Further prospective studies are advised to confirm these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 134:1696-1704, 2024.

Comparison of Three Tonsillectomy Techniques: Cold Dissection, Monopolar Electrocautery, and Coblation

Introduction  Tonsillectomy is among the most common otolaryngological surgeries. Objective  To evaluate and compare three tonsillectomy techniques: cold steel dissection (CSD), monopolar electrocautery (MEC), and coblation. Methods  The present study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent tonsillectomy between January 2014 and January 2016. Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, analgesic use, surgical duration, time to return to normal activity, and postoperative bleeding status were noted. Results  The CSD group had less analgesic use and shorter return to normal activity than the MEC group ( p  = 0.037 and p  < 0.001, respectively). The coblation group had lower VAS pain scores than the MEC group only at 1 hour to 4 hours postsurgery ( p  < 0.016). The postoperative bleeding rate was similar in all groups ( p  = 0.096). Conclusion  Cold steel dissection tonsillectomy is associated with less postoperative pain and shorter recovery than MEC. Coblation is better than MEC in terms of postoperative pain at 1 hour to 4 hours only, whereas CSD is associated with less postoperative pain than coblation at 2 days to 7 days.

Intrapatient Comparison of Coblation versus Electrocautery Tonsillectomy in Children: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Many surgical instruments have been introduced and compared for safety and surgical efficiency in tonsillectomy. This study aimed to compare postoperative pain between coblation and conventional monopolar electrocautery tonsillectomy by intrapatient comparison in children. Thirty pediatric patients over six years of age undergoing tonsillectomies were enrolled. Coblation and electrocautery were used to remove both tonsils in one patient; one was removed by coblation and the other by electrocautery. The coblation side was randomly selected, and it was blinded to the patients. Each side’s daily pain scores were collected on the visual analogue scale (VAS) during ten postoperative days. On the day of surgery, 22 (73%) patients identified less pain on the coblation side, while others felt similar pain. The mean pain scores were significantly lower on the coblation side during the postoperative ten days (except for the 6th and 8th) than on the electrocautery side. The duration of severe pain (VAS > 5) was significantly shorter on the coblation side than on the electrocautery side (2.0 versus 3.7 days, respectively; p = 0.042). Coblation tonsillectomy induced less pain than electrocautery in pediatric patients; therefore, surgeons could choose the coblator as a surgical instrument for tonsillectomy to improve the pediatric postoperative quality of life.

Comparison of outcomes between thermal welding forceps, controlled ablation and monopolar electrosurgery for tonsillectomy in children

OBJECTIVE

To compare recovery from tonsillectomy using thermal welding forceps (TWF), controlled ablation (CA), and monopolar electrosurgery (MES) in children.

METHODS

This was a prospective single blinded observational study using data from electronic medical record (EMR) and caregiver completed patient diary, conducted at a community-based children's hospital within an academic program with tonsillectomy performed by attending surgeons. Children aged 3-17 years undergoing tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy by TWF, CA, or MES over a 4-year period were included. Demographics, intraoperative time for tonsillectomy, blood loss, patient diary documentation of pain levels, analgesic doses, diet type and events per day were recorded. In addition, EMR documentation of morbidity events (bleeding, visits for bleeding, return to operating room [OR], total visits or admissions, poor oral intake or dehydration) were noted. To assess for differences in baseline characteristics, we utilized analysis of variance and Pearson's χ² test. To determine primary outcomes, we used a multilevel mixed-effect linear regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 369 children were enrolled, and 346 who met inclusion criteria underwent tonsillectomy. The children were categorized by the instrument used by the surgeons: CA 32.4% (n = 112), MES 36.7% (n = 127), and TWF 30.9% (n = 107). Mean age overall was 6.8 ± 3.2 years, with 57.4% female and 42.6% male. Diary return rate was 52.3% (n = 181) overall, with CA at 48.2% (n = 54), MES at 44.8% (n = 57), and TWF at 65.4% (n = 70). Average pain on the day of surgery was different between instruments with CA having the lowest level of 2.0 compared to 2.7 for TWF and MES (p = 0.001). Maximum pain level for day of surgery were lowest for CA at 2.7 compared to 3.4 for MES and 3.5 for TWF (p = 0.003). Pain levels were lowest for TWF after postoperative day (POD) 6. Overall rate of bleeding was 9.3%, with 2.6% return to surgery for control of bleeding. TWF had the lowest rate of bleeds (4.7% versus CA 11.6% and MES 11.0%), return to surgery (0.0% versus CA 2.7% and MES 4.7%), the earliest and final return to regular diet at POD 5.8 and 8.1, respectively without reaching statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

CA had significantly lowest early pain levels on day 0-1 and trended lowest up to POD 6, after which TWF was lowest but did not reach statistical significance. TWF had the earliest return to regular diet. Children undergoing CA and MES are more likely to have a postoperative bleed and a return to the OR than TWF suggesting improved ability to seal vessels with the latter instrument. Further study with a larger sample is needed.

Comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of the therapeutic effects of coblation tonsillectomy versus electrocautery tonsillectomy

BACKGROUND

Surgical removal of the primary lesion is a common treatment for chronic tonsillitis, recurrent tonsillitis, and tonsillar hypertrophy, and is the most widely performed surgery in otorhinolaryngology. With the development and progress of medical science and technology, the methods of tonsillectomy have gradually diversified, and it is of great significance to seek the best tonsillectomy method. This meta-analysis explored the advantages and disadvantages of coblation tonsillectomy (CT) and electrocautery tonsillectomy (ET).

METHODS

The keywords "coblation", "radiofrequency ablation", "electrocautery", and "tonsillectomy" were used to search the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar databases, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the 2 procedures since the establishment of the database were included. After screening and bias risk assessment, a meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 10 articles met the inclusion criteria and entered the final meta-analysis. There were 1,056 participants, including 547 patients who underwent CT and 509 patients who underwent ET. There was no significant difference in the operation time between CT and ET [standard mean difference (SMD) =0.39, 95% CI: -0.35 to 1.13, Z=1.044, P=0.296]. CT resulted in less intraoperative blood loss than ET (SMD =-2.62, 95% CI: -4.83 to -0.41, Z=-2.322, P=0.020). The postoperative pain score of CT was less than ET, but the difference was not statistically significant (SMD =-0.28, 95% CI: -0.58 to 0.01, Z=-1.866, P=0.062). CT resulted in less time to return to normal diet after surgery than ET, and the difference was statistically significant (SMD =-0.36, 95% CI: -0.60 to -0.12, Z=-2.918, P=0.004).

DISCUSSION

CT resulted in less intraoperative blood loss and faster postoperative recovery than ET, but there was no significant difference in operation time, postoperative pain, and the incidence rate of postoperative complications between the 2 groups.

Cost benefit of coblation versus electrocautery adenotonsillectomy for pediatric patients

INTRODUCTION

Coblation and electrocautery are two common techniques used for adenotonsillectomy (T&A). Numerous studies have assessed surgical outcomes of coblation versus electrocautery and overall, postoperative complications are similar with the exception of a decrease in patient reported postoperative pain for coblation. Instrumentation required for coblation is significantly more expensive than that required for electrocautery. With minimal outcome differences, justification for the additional instrumentation costs is difficult. We performed this study to assess if there is a difference between operative & postoperative costs of electrocautery and coblation.

METHODS

300 patient medical records were reviewed from 2015 to 2017 with equal numbers of electrocautery and coblation surgeries. Outcome measures included finance information, duration and cost of OR and Phase I and Phase II post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), in-hospital pharmacy costs, and postoperative complications. Logistic regression was used for analysis.

RESULTS

The median patient age for each surgical technique was 6 years old. Electrocautery resulted in more time in the OR compared to coblation, (OR:1.11,95%CI:1.07-1.15, p < .001), with greater associated costs, p < .001. Electrocautery patients were under anesthesia longer and had a longer surgical duration, p < .001. These same patients had longer duration in Phase II PACU, p = .028, and were given pain medications an increased number of times, p < .001. Total costs including operative expense, physician charges, OR and anesthesia times, pharmacy, and instrument were significantly higher for electrocautery patients, p = .003. There were no differences in ED visits, post-tonsillectomy bleed, or additional surgery between techniques, p > .05.

CONCLUSION

T&A electrocautery technique was found to have increased overall indirect costs. Costs of instrumentation in addition to increased operative time, use of analgesics and post-operative care contribute to costs associated with electrocautery and coblation should be used when assessing surgical costs.

Prospective randomized comparison of tongue base resection techniques: Robotic vs coblation

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness and morbidities of two different tongue base surgical approaches in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA).

DESIGN AND SETTING

We carried out a prospective analysis in order to understand in detail the relative impact on apnoeas of the two different tongue base procedures. Seventy cases in 85 patients with OSA were divided into two operating groups and randomized. Altogether, 37 transoral robotic surgeries (TORS) and 33 coblations were performed. The patency of retrolingual passage was investigated by Muller's manoeuvere, polysomnography. Apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) was the primary outcome measure with the Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS). The final follow-up visit was at 6 months.

RESULTS

The AHI index improved from 29.7 ± 9 to 10.7 ± 3.9 (P < .005) following TORS and from 27.2 ± 6.4 to 10.3 ± 4 in the coblation group. Selecting a threshold of a 50% reduction in AHI and AHI less than 20 events/h, the overall success rate was 75.6% in TORS compared with 78.7% in coblation (P = .785). Similar results were seen in AHI reduction rates (36%, 37.8%, respectively). ESS showed a significant improvement 6 months following surgery in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Transoral robotic surgery technique showed higher complication rates than coblation. TORS and coblation of the tongue base represent a promising treatment option with a similar AHI improvement. However, coblation promises lower complication rates unlike TORS.

Postoperative Pain and 14-Day Recovery in Children Undergoing Adenotonsillectomy: Low Thermal Damage Device Versus Electrosurgery

This was a randomized controlled trial of low thermal damage device versus traditional electrosurgery in children 3 to 17 years old with a clinical diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing, obstructive sleep apnea with adenotonsillar hypertrophy, or recurrent adenotonsillitis. Pain score (Wong-Baker FACES pain scale) was recorded each morning before eating, drinking, or administering pain medication for 14 days postoperatively. Seventy-five children were enrolled. There was no difference in the rate of decrease in pain scores. A significant interaction between rate of pain decrease and number of pain medication doses was present ( P < .0001). Median number of pain medication doses was greater with electrosurgery (36, range: 7-49) versus low thermal device (21, range: 2-124; P = .001). Pain scores reached 0 after a median of 7 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2-8.6) for low thermal device and 9 days (95% CI, 8.0-10.0) for electrosurgery ( P = .67). One child randomized to electrosurgery was withdrawn due to hospitalization for postoperative bleed. In children, low thermal device results in significantly less pain medication used during the postoperative period than electrosurgery.

The debate continues: a prospective, randomised, single-blind study comparing Coblation and bipolar tonsillectomy techniques

OBJECTIVES

Tonsillectomy is a common procedure with significant post-operative pain. This study was designed to compare post-operative pain, returns to a normal diet and normal activity, and duration of regular analgesic use in Coblation and bipolar tonsillectomy patients.

METHODS

A total of 137 patients, aged 2-50 years, presenting to a single institution for tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy were recruited. Pain level, diet, analgesic use, return to normal activity and haemorrhage data were collected.

RESULTS

Coblation tonsillectomy was associated with significantly less pain than bipolar tonsillectomy on post-operative days 1 (p = 0.005), 2 (p = 0.006) and 3 (p = 0.010). Mean pain scores were also significantly lower in the Coblation group (p = 0.039). Coblation patients had a significantly faster return to normal activity than bipolar tonsillectomy patients (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Coblation tonsillectomy is a less painful technique compared to bipolar tonsillectomy in the immediate post-operative period and in the overall post-operative period. This allows a faster return to normal activity and decreased analgesic requirements.

Comparison of robotic and coblation tongue base resection for obstructive sleep apnoea

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with endoscope-guided coblation tongue base resection.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

SETTING

University-based tertiary care medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) who underwent endoscope-guided tongue base coblation resection or transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in combination with lateral pharyngoplasty at a single institution in South Korea between April 2013 and December 2016 were investigated. Forty-five patients who had moderate-to-severe OSA with tongue base collapse and a minimum follow-up period of 6 months with postoperative polysomnography (PSG) were enrolled in this study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All patients underwent pre- and postoperative (at least 4 months after surgery) overnight PSG. Available information on results of the PSG, Epworth sleepiness scale and complications of the TORS and coblation groups were compared.

RESULTS

Postoperative PSG studies showed improved sleep quality for most patients. The mean postoperative apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) was reduced significantly from 45.0 to 17.0 events/h (P < .0001) in the TORS group and from 45.6 to 16.2 events/h (P < .0001) in the coblation group. The mean rates of improvement (AHI reduction > 50%) were 75.0% in TORS patients and 62.1% in coblation patients and the difference was not significant. Less frequent postoperative morbidity, including bleeding, taste dysfunction and foreign body sensation, was recorded in TORS patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the coblation and TORS groups showed similar surgical outcomes, TORS achieved PSG results non-inferior to and complication rates comparable to coblation.

Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillectomy

BACKGROUND

Tonsillectomy is a very common operation and is performed using various surgical methods. Coblation is a popular method because it purportedly causes less pain than other surgical methods. However, the superiority of coblation is unproven.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of coblation tonsillectomy for chronic tonsillitis or tonsillar hypertrophy with other surgical techniques, both hot and cold, on intraoperative morbidity, postoperative morbidity and procedural cost.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the ENT Trials Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2017, Issue 3); PubMed; Ovid Embase; CINAHL; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 20 April 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of children and adults undergoing tonsillectomy with coblation compared with any other surgical technique. This review is limited to trials of extracapsular (traditional) tonsillectomy and excludes trials of intracapsular tonsil removal (tonsillotomy).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were: patient-reported pain using a validated pain scale at postoperative days 1, 3 and 7; intraoperative blood loss; primary postoperative bleeding (within 24 hours) and secondary postoperative bleeding (more than 24 hours after surgery). Secondary outcomes were: time until resumption of normal diet, time until resumption of normal activity, duration of surgery and adverse effects including blood transfusion and the need for reoperation. We used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence for each outcome; this is indicated in italics.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 29 studies, with a total of 2561 participants. All studies had moderate or high risk of bias. Sixteen studies used an adequate randomisation technique, however the inability to mask the surgical teams and/or provide adequate methods to mitigate the risk of bias put nearly all studies at moderate or high risk of detection and measurement bias for intraoperative blood loss, and primary and secondary bleeding. In contrast most studies (20) were at low risk of bias for pain assessment. Most studies did not report data in a manner permitting meta-analysis.Most studies did not clearly report the participant characteristics, surgical indications or whether patients underwent tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy. Most studies reported that tonsillitis (infection) and/or tonsillar hypertrophy (obstruction) were the indication for surgery. Seven studies included only adults, 16 studies included only children and six studies included both. Pain At postoperative day 1 there is very low quality evidence that patients in the coblation group had less pain, with a standardised mean difference (SMD) of -0.79 (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.38 to -0.19; 538 participants; six studies). This effect is reduced a SMD of -0.44 (95% CI -0.97 to 0.09; 401 participants; five studies; very low-quality evidence) at day 3, and at day 7 there is low quality evidence of little or no difference in pain (SMD -0.01, 95% CI -0.22 to 0.19; 420 participants; five studies). Although this suggests that pain may be slightly less in the coblation group between days 1 and 3, the clinical significance is unclear. Intraoperative blood loss Methodological differences between studies in the measurement of intraoperative blood loss precluded meta-analysis. Primary and secondary bleeding The risk of primary bleeding was similar (risk ratio (RR) 0.99, 95% CI 0.48 to 2.05; 2055 participants; 25 studies; low-quality evidence). The risk of secondary bleeding was greater in the coblation group with a risk ratio of 1.36 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.95; 2118 participants; 25 studies; low-quality evidence). Using the median of the control group as the baseline risk, the absolute risk in the coblation group was 5% versus 3.6% in the control group. The difference of 1.3% has a 95% CI of 0.2% lower in the coblation group to 3.5% higher. Secondary outcomes Differences in study design and data reporting precluded the identification of differences in the time to resumption of normal diet or activity, or whether there was a difference in the duration of surgery.Although we could not feasibly compare the costs of equipment or operative facility, anaesthetic and surgical fees across different healthcare systems we used duration of surgery as a proxy for cost. Although this outcome was commonly reported in studies, it was not possible to pool the data to determine whether there was a difference.Adverse events other than bleeding were not well reported. It is unclear whether there is a difference in postoperative infections or the need for reoperation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The coblation technique may cause less pain on postoperative day 1, but the difference is small and may be clinically meaningless. By postoperative day 3, the difference decreases further and by postoperative day 7 there appears to be little or no difference. We found similar rates of primary bleeding but we cannot rule out a small increased risk of secondary bleeding with coblation. The evidence supporting these findings is of low or very low quality, i.e. there is a very high degree of uncertainty about the results. Moreover, for most outcomes data were only available from a few of the 29 included studies.The current evidence is of very low quality, therefore it is uncertain whether or not the coblation technique has any advantages over traditional tonsillectomy techniques. Despite the large number of studies, failure to use standardised or validated outcome measures precludes the ability to pool data across studies. Therefore, well-conducted RCTs using consistent, validated outcome measures are needed to establish whether the coblation technique has a benefit over other methods. In the included studies we identified no clear difference in adverse events. However, given the rarity of these events, randomised trials lack the power to detect a difference. Data from large-scale registries will provide a better estimate of any difference in these rare outcomes.

Coblation tonsillectomy: a systematic review and descriptive analysis

Coblation is one of the more recent techniques for tonsillectomy; however, it remains unclear whether it exhibits any benefit or increased risk when compared to other techniques. This review provides an updated assessment of coblation tonsillectomy and how it compares to other tonsillectomy techniques. Systematic review and descriptive analysis of published literature. Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Database were performed. We included all randomized control trials comparing coblation tonsillectomy (not 'tonsillotomy') with any other tonsillectomy technique. Studies were excluded if tonsils, rather than individuals, were randomized. 16 eligible studies were identified, including a total of 567 patients, both adults and children. Coblation was compared with a variety of other tonsillectomy techniques. Outcomes included pain, primary and secondary haemorrhage, intraoperative bleeding and operation time. Postoperative pain was the primary outcome in most studies. There was a trend towards less pain in the coblation group in seven of the included studies. More recent studies appeared to fare more favourably in terms of pain outcomes and operating time. The coblation technique appears to be comparable with other commonly employed techniques for tonsillectomy; however, there is still no strong evidence to suggest that it possesses any definitive benefits. Findings would advocate further work being done through carefully designed randomised control trials, which compare coblation with cold dissection as the 'gold standard' and place an emphasis on reducing the amount of adjuvant electrocautery used so as to maximise the benefits of coblation and the lower temperature it generates.

Postoperative Bleeding and Associated Utilization following Tonsillectomy in Children

Objective To assess posttonsillectomy hemorrhage (PTH), associated nonoperative readmissions/revisits, and reoperations in children. Data Sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Review Methods Two investigators independently screened studies against predetermined criteria and extracted key data. Investigators independently assessed study risk of bias and the strength of the evidence of the body of literature. We calculated unadjusted pooled estimates of PTH frequency and conducted a Bayesian meta-analysis to estimate frequency of primary and secondary PTH and PTH-associated reoperation and revisits/readmissions by partial and total tonsillectomy and surgical approach. Results In meta-analysis, the frequency of primary and secondary PTH associated with total and partial tonsillectomy was <4% for any technique and with overlapping confidence bounds. Pooled frequencies of PTH were also <5% overall (4.2% for total tonsillectomy, 1.5% for partial tonsillectomy) in comparative studies. Fewer PTH episodes occurred with tonsillectomy for obstructive sleep-disordered breathing than for throat infection. In meta-analysis, frequency of PTH-associated nonoperative revisits/readmission or reoperation ranged from 0.2% to 5.7% for total tonsillectomy and from 0.1% to 3.7% for partial tonsillectomy. At least 4 deaths were reported in case series including 1,778,342 children. Conclusions PTH occurred in roughly 4% of tonsillectomies in studies included in this review. Although studies typically did not report bleeding severity or amount, relatively few episodes of PTH necessitated reoperation for hemostasis. Nonetheless, tonsillectomy is not without risk of harm. Frequency of PTH across techniques was similar; thus, we cannot conclude that a given technique is superior.

Coblation tonsillectomy under surgical microscopy: A retrospective study

Objective

A retrospective study to compare surgical parameters and postoperative pain in patients undergoing coblation tonsillectomy with or without microscopic guidance.

Methods

Data regarding duration of surgery and hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, incidence of haemorrhage and postoperative pain scores were retrieved from the medical records of adult patients undergoing coblation tonsillectomy under direct vision or with microscopic guidance.

Results

The incidence of secondary haemorrhage (>24 h postoperatively) was significantly lower and the duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the microscope group (n = 92) than the direct vision group (n = 76). Pain scores both at rest and while swallowing reached ≤3 (no significant impact on quality-of-life) significantly faster in the microscope group than the direct vision group.

Conclusions

Microscope-assisted coblation tonsillectomy decreases the duration of hospital stay and the incidence of postoperative secondary haemorrhage, and results in an early improvement in postoperative pain scores.

Appropriate dose of dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence agitation after desflurane anesthesia for tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy in children: up and down sequential allocation

Background

Dexmedetomidine can be used for the prevention of emergence agitation (EA) in children. However, an inadequate dose of dexmedetomidine can induce prolonged sedation and cardiovascular complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effective dose of dexmedetomidine for the prevention of EA after desflurane anesthesia for patients undergoing a tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy.

Methods

We enrolled 21 unpremedicated children, between 2 and 12 years, undergoing either a tonsillectomy or an adenoidectomy. General anesthesia was induced using sevoflurane and oxygen, and dexmedetomidine was administered before surgery. Anesthesia was maintained using desflurane resulting in a BIS range of 40–60. In the postanesthetic care unit (PACU), EA (agitation measured at level 4 or more at least once) was assessed on arrival in the PACU,15 min later, and 30 min later. The dose of dexmedetomidine for consecutive patients was determined by the response of the previous patient, using an increment or decrement of 0.1 μg/kg.

Results

The 50 % effective dose of dexmedetomidine for prevention of EA was 0.25 μg/kg (95 % confidence limits, 0.17–0.33 μg/kg), and the 95 % effective dose was 0.38 μg/kg (95 % confidence limits, 0.29–0.39 μg/kg).

Conclusions

For prevention of EA after desflurane anesthesia for 50 % and 95 % of children undergoing tonsillectomies or adenoidectomies, 0.25 μg/kg or 0.38 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine is suggested. Further study is needed to validate the suggested dose of dexmedetomidine to prevent the EA that was identified in the present study.

Trial registration

Clinical Research Information Service KCT0000126.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, and otolaryngology: review of the evidence

BACKGROUND

The adoption of evidence-based practice is fundamental to good medical care; it ensures that intervention is clinically effective and safe. In a world of limited healthcare resources, consideration of cost-effectiveness must, unfortunately, restrict clinicians' choice. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence has, for over 10 years, developed guidance to achieve a national consensus on best practice.

OBJECTIVES

This review describes the Institute's methodology, examines guidance relevant to otolaryngology and presents more recent research to update the evidence.