Presynaptic purine receptors

Role of opioid receptors in modulation of P2X receptor-mediated cardiac sympathoexcitatory reflex response

Myocardial ischemia evokes powerful reflex responses through activation of vagal and sympathetic afferents in the heart through the release of ischemic metabolites. We have demonstrated that extracellular ATP stimulates cardiac sympathetic afferents through P2 receptor-mediated mechanism, and that opioid peptides suppress these afferents' activity. However, the roles of both P2 receptor and endogenous opioids in cardiac sympathoexcitatory reflex (CSR) responses remain unclear. We therefore hypothesized that activation of cardiac P2 receptor evokes CSR responses by stimulating cardiac sympathetic afferents and these CSR responses are modulated by endogenous opioids. We observed that intrapericardial injection of α,β-methylene ATP (α,β-meATP, P2X receptor agonist), but not ADP (P2Y receptor agonist), caused a graded increase in mean arterial pressure in rats with sinoaortic denervation and vagotomy. This effect of α,β-meATP was abolished by blockade of cardiac neural transmission with intrapericardial procaine treatment and eliminated by intrapericardial A-317491, a selective P2X_2/3 and P2X₃ receptor antagonist. Intrapericardial α,β-meATP also evoked CSR response in vagus-intact rats. Furthermore, the P2X receptor-mediated CSR responses were enhanced by intrapericardial naloxone, a specific opioid receptor antagonist. These data suggest that stimulation of cardiac P2X_2/3 and P2X₃, but not P2Y receptors, powerfully evokes CSR responses through activation of cardiac spinal afferents, and that endogenous opioids suppress the P2X receptor-mediated CSR responses.

Simultaneous analysis of vascular norepinephrine and ATP release using an integrated microfluidic system

BACKGROUND

Sympathetic nerves are known to release three neurotransmitters: norepinephrine, ATP, and neuropeptide Y that play a role in controlling vascular tone. This paper focuses on the co-release of norepinephrine and ATP from the mesenteric arterial sympathetic nerves of the rat.

NEW METHOD

In this paper, a quantification technique is described that allows simultaneous detection of norepinephrine and ATP in a near-real-time fashion from the isolated perfused mesenteric arterial bed of the rat. Simultaneous detection is enabled with 3-D printing technology, which is shown to help integrate the perfusate with different detection methods (norepinephrine by microchip-based amperometery and ATP by on-line chemiluminescence).

RESULTS

Stimulated levels relative to basal levels of norepinephrine and ATP were found to be 363nM and 125nM, respectively (n=6). The limit of detection for norepinephrine is 80nM using microchip-based amperometric detection. The LOD for on-line ATP detection using chemiluminescence is 35nM.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD

In previous studies, the co-transmitters have been separated and detected with HPLC techniques. With HPLC, the samples from biological preparations have to be derivatized for ATP detection and require collection time before analysis. Thus real-time measurements are not made and the delay in analysis by HPLC can cause degradation.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the method described in the paper can be used to successfully detect norepinephrine and ATP simultaneously and in a near-real-time fashion.

Guanosine regulates adenosine levels in the kidney

In cell culture, extracellular guanosine increases extracellular adenosine by attenuating the disposition of extracellular adenosine (American Journal of Physiology – Cell Physiology 304: C406–C421, 2013). The goal of this investigation was to determine whether this “guanosine–adenosine mechanism” is operative in an intact organ. Twenty‐seven isolated, perfused mouse kidneys were subjected to metabolic poisons (iodoacetate plus 2,4‐dinitrophenol) to cause energy depletion and thereby stimulate renal adenosine production. Adenosine levels in the renal venous perfusate increased from a baseline of 36 ± 8 to 499 ± 96, 258 ± 50, and 71 ± 13 nmol/L at 15, 30, and 60 min, respectively, after administering metabolic poisons (% of basal; 1366 ± 229, 715 ± 128, and 206 ± 33, respectively). Changes in renal venous levels of guanosine closely mirrored the time course of changes in adenosine: baseline of 15 ± 2 to 157 ± 13, 121 ± 8, and 50 ± 5 nmol/L at 15, 30, and 60 min, respectively (% of basal; 1132 ± 104, 871 ± 59, and 400 ± 51, respectively). Freeze‐clamp experiments in 12 kidneys confirmed that metabolic poisons increased kidney tissue levels of adenosine and guanosine. In eight additional kidneys, we examined the ability of guanosine to reduce the renal clearance of exogenous adenosine; and these experiments revealed that guanosine significantly decreased the renal extraction of adenosine. Because guanosine is metabolized by purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNPase), in another set of 16 kidneys we examined the effects of 8‐aminoguanine (PNPase inhibitor) on renal venous levels of adenosine and inosine (adenosine metabolite). Kidneys treated with 8‐aminoguanine showed a more robust increase in both adenosine and inosine in response to metabolic poisons. We conclude that in the intact kidney, guanosine regulates adenosine levels.

In cell culture, extracellular guanosine increases extracellular adenosine by attenuating the disposition of extracellular adenosine (American Journal of Physiology – Cell Physiology 304: C406–C421, 2013). The goal of this study was to determine whether the “guanosine–adenosine mechanism” is operative in an intact organ. In isolated, perfused mouse kidneys, inhibition of energy production induced changes in renal venous levels of guanosine that closely mirrored the time course of changes in adenosine, and freeze‐clamp experiments confirmed that metabolic poisons similarly increased kidney tissue levels of adenosine and guanosine. Moreover, exogenous guanosine significantly decreased the renal extraction of exogenous adenosine, and inhibition of purine nucleoside phosphorylase (metabolizes guanosine) augmented the effects of energy depletion on renal levels of both guanosine and adenosine. We conclude that in the intact kidney, guanosine regulates adenosine levels.

Regulation of Cell Proliferation by the Guanosine-Adenosine Mechanism: Role of Adenosine Receptors

A recent study (American Journal of Physiology – Cell Physiology 304:C406–C421, 2013) suggests that extracellular guanosine increases extracellular adenosine by modifying the disposition of extracellular adenosine (“guanosine–adenosine mechanism”) and that the guanosine–adenosine mechanism is not mediated by classical adenosine transport systems (SLC28 and SLC29 families) nor by classical adenosine-metabolizing enzymes. The present investigation had two aims (1) to test the hypothesis that the “guanosine–adenosine mechanism” affects cell proliferation; and (2) to determine whether the transporters SLC19A1, SLC19A2, SLC19A3, or SLC22A2 (known to carrier guanosine analogs) might be responsible for the guanosine–adenosine mechanism. In the absence of added adenosine, guanosine had little effect on the proliferation of coronary artery vascular smooth muscle cells (vascular conduit cells) or preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells (vascular resistance cells). However, in the presence of added adenosine (3 or 10 μmol/L), guanosine (10–100 μmol/L) decreased proliferation of both cell types, thus resulting in a highly significant (P < 0.000001) interaction between guanosine and adenosine on cell proliferation. The guanosine–adenosine interaction on cell proliferation was abolished by 1,3-dipropyl-8-(p-sulfophenyl)xanthine (adenosine receptor antagonist). Guanosine (30 μmol/L) increased extracellular levels of adenosine when adenosine (3 μmol/L) was added to the medium. This effect was not reproduced by high concentrations of methotrexate (100 μmol/L), thiamine (1000 μmol/L), chloroquine (1000 μmol/L), or acyclovir (10,000 μmol/L), archetypal substrates for SLC19A1, SLC19A2, SLC19A3, and SLC22A2, respectively; and guanosine still increased adenosine levels in the presence of these compounds. In conclusion, the guanosine–adenosine mechanism affects cell proliferation and is not mediated by SLC19A1, SLC19A2, SLC19A3, or SLC22A2.

Extracellular guanosine regulates extracellular adenosine levels

The aim of this investigation was to test the hypothesis that extracellular guanosine regulates extracellular adenosine levels. Rat preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells were incubated with adenosine, guanosine, or both. Guanosine (30 μmol/l) per se had little effect on extracellular adenosine levels. Extracellular adenosine levels 1 h after addition of adenosine (3 μmol/l) were 0.125 ± 0.020 μmol/l, indicating rapid disposition of extracellular adenosine. Extracellular adenosine levels 1 h after addition of adenosine (3 μmol/l) plus guanosine (30 μmol/l) were 1.173 ± 0.061 μmol/l, indicating slow disposition of extracellular adenosine. Cell injury increased extracellular levels of endogenous adenosine and guanosine, and the effects of cell injury on endogenous extracellular adenosine were modulated by altering the levels of endogenous extracellular guanosine with exogenous purine nucleoside phosphorylase (converts guanosine to guanine) or 8-aminoguanosine (inhibits purine nucleoside phosphorylase). Extracellular guanosine also slowed the disposition of extracellular adenosine in rat preglomerular vascular endothelial cells, mesangial cells, cardiac fibroblasts, and kidney epithelial cells and in human aortic and coronary artery vascular smooth muscle cells and coronary artery endothelial cells. The effects of guanosine on adenosine levels were not mimicked or attenuated by 5-iodotubericidin (adenosine kinase inhibitor), erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl)-adenine (adenosine deaminase inhibitor), 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide (guanine deaminase inhibitor), aristeromycin (S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase inhibitor), low sodium (inhibits concentrative nucleoside transporters), S-(4-nitrobenzyl)-6-thioinosine [inhibits equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT) type 1], zidovudine (inhibits ENT type 2), or acadesine (known modulator of adenosine levels). Guanosine also increases extracellular inosine, uridine, thymidine, and cytidine, yet decreases extracellular uric acid. In conclusion, extracellular guanosine regulates extracellular adenosine levels.

Neuronal and non-neuronal modulation of sympathetic neurovascular transmission

Noradrenaline, neuropeptide Y and adenosine triphosphate are co-stored in, and co-released from, sympathetic nerves. Each transmitter modulates its own release as well as the release of one another; thus, anything affecting the release of one of these transmitters has consequences for all. Neurotransmission at the sympathetic neurovascular junction is also modulated by non-sympathetic mediators such as angiotensin II, serotonin, histamine, endothelin and prostaglandins through the activation of specific pre-junctional receptors. In addition, nitric oxide (NO) has been identified as a modulator of sympathetic neuronal activity, both as a physiological antagonist against the vasoconstrictor actions of the sympathetic neurotransmitters, and also by directly affecting transmitter release. Here, we review the modulation of sympathetic neurovascular transmission by neuronal and non-neuronal mediators with an emphasis on the actions of NO. The consequences for co-transmission are also discussed, particularly in light of hypertensive states where NO availability is diminished.

P2 receptor signaling in neurons and glial cells of the central nervous system

Purine and pyrimidine nucleotides are extracellular signaling molecules in the central nervous system (CNS) leaving the intracellular space of various CNS cell types via nonexocytotic mechanisms. In addition, ATP is a neuro-and gliotransmitter released by exocytosis from neurons and neuroglia. These nucleotides activate P2 receptors of the P2X (ligand-gated cationic channels) and P2Y (G protein-coupled receptors) types. In mammalians, seven P2X and eight P2Y receptor subunits occur; three P2X subtypes form homomeric or heteromeric P2X receptors. P2Y subtypes may also hetero-oligomerize with each other as well as with other G protein-coupled receptors. P2X receptors are able to physically associate with various types of ligand-gated ion channels and thereby to interact with them. The P2 receptor homomers or heteromers exhibit specific sensitivities against pharmacological ligands and have preferential functional roles. They may be situated at both presynaptic (nerve terminals) and postsynaptic (somatodendritic) sites of neurons, where they modulate either transmitter release or the postsynaptic sensitivity to neurotransmitters. P2 receptors exist at neuroglia (e.g., astrocytes, oligodendrocytes) and microglia in the CNS. The neuroglial P2 receptors subserve the neuron-glia cross talk especially via their end-feets projecting to neighboring synapses. In addition, glial networks are able to communicate through coordinated oscillations of their intracellular Ca(2+) over considerable distances. P2 receptors are involved in the physiological regulation of CNS functions as well as in its pathophysiological dysregulation. Normal (motivation, reward, embryonic and postnatal development, neuroregeneration) and abnormal regulatory mechanisms (pain, neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, epilepsy) are important examples for the significance of P2 receptor-mediated/modulated processes.

Failure of presynaptic purinoceptors to modulate noradrenaline release from sympathetic nerves in human dental pulp

The effects of putative presynaptic P1- and/or P2-purinoceptors on the release of noradrenaline from sympathetic nerves in human dental pulp were examined by testing the effects of agonists and an antagonist of these receptors on the stimulation-induced overflow of [(3)H]noradrenaline from tissue treated with desipramine (0.3 micromol/l) and preincubated with [(3)H]noradrenaline (0.6 micromol/l). The P1-purinoceptor agonists adenosine (1.0 mmol/l) and 2-chloroadenosine (0.01-1.0 mmol/l) and the antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropyl xanthine (1.0 micromol/l), and the P2-purinoceptor agonists ATP (0.1 mmol/l) and beta, gamma-methylene-ATP (0.01 mmol/l), did not modulate the release of noradrenaline. Adenosine was also without effect in dental pulp treated with the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist rauwolscine. It is concluded that presynaptic P1-purinoceptors and those P2-purinoceptors activated by adenine nucleotides are either not present on sympathetic nerves in human dental pulp or that they exert little or no effect on the release of noradrenaline.

Modulation by adenine nucleotides of epileptiform activity in the CA3 region of rat hippocampal slices

1. Hippocampal slices (450 microm) generate epileptiform bursts of an interictal nature when perfused with a zero magnesium medium containing 4-aminopyridine (50 microM). The effect of adenine nucleotides on this activity was investigated. 2. ATP and adenosine depressed this epileptiform activity in a concentration-dependent manner, with both purines being equipotent at concentrations above 10 microM. 3. Adenosine deaminase 0.2 u ml(-1), a concentration that annuls the effect of adenosine (50 microM), did not significantly alter the depression of activity caused by ATP (50 microM). 4. 8-Cyclopentyl-1,3-dimethylxanthine (CPT), an A1 receptor antagonist, enhanced the discharge rate significantly and inhibited the depressant effect of both ATP and adenosine such that the net effect of ATP or adenosine plus CPT was excitatory. 5. Several ATP analogues were also tested: alpha, beta-methyleneATP (alpha, beta-meATP), 2-methylthioATP (2-meSATP) and uridine triphosphate (UTP). Only alpha, beta-meATP (10 microM) produced an increase in the frequency of spontaneous activity which suggests a lack of involvement of P2Y or P2U receptors. 6. Suramin and pyridoxalphosphate-6-azophenyl-2',4'-disulphonic acid (PPADS), P2 receptor antagonists, failed to inhibit the depression produced by ATP (50 microM). The excitatory effect of alpha, beta-meATP (10 microM) was inhibited by suramin (50 microM) and PPADS (5 microM). 7. ATP therefore depresses epileptiform activity in this model in a manner which is not consistent with the activation of known P1 or P2 receptors, suggesting the involvement of a xanthine-sensitive nucleotide receptor. The results are also indicative of an excitatory P2X receptor existing in the hippocampal CA3 region.

Autoreceptor-induced inhibition of neuropeptide Y release from PC-12 cells is mediated by Y2 receptors

Pheochromocytoma (PC)-12 cells express Y1, Y2, and Y3 neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors when differentiated with nerve growth factor (NGF). The present work evaluated NGF-differentiated PC-12 cells as a model system to study modulation of NPY release by NPY autoreceptors. We demonstrated that both K+ and nicotine stimulated concomitant release of NPY and dopamine from differentiated PC-12 cells. We also showed in this study that NPY release from PC-12 cells was attenuated in a concentration-dependent manner by peptide YY (PYY)-(13-36), a selective agonist for the Y2 type of NPY receptors. This result demonstrated that NPY release could be modulated by NPY autoreceptors of the Y2 subtype. The inhibitory action of PYY-(13-36) may be mediated at least in part by inhibition of N-type Ca2+ channels, because PYY-(13-36) could not produce further inhibitory effects in the presence of a maximum effective concentration of omega-conotoxin, an N-type Ca2+-channel blocker. The inhibition by PYY-(13-36) could be blocked by pretreatment of cells with pertussis toxin, suggesting that an inhibitory GTP-binding protein was involved. Furthermore, the function of NPY autoreceptors could be modulated by other receptors such as beta-adrenergic and ATP receptors. The evoked release of NPY was also attenuated by ATP and adenosine, which have been shown to be colocalized and coreleased with NPY from sympathetic nerve terminals. These results suggest that PC-12 cells differentiated with NGF may be an ideal model to study regulatory mechanisms of NPY release and that autoreceptor-mediated regulation of NPY release appears to act through the Y2 subtype of the NPY receptor.

Evidence for the presence of two types of P2 purinoceptor in the guinea-pig ileal longitudinal smooth muscle preparation

The effects of some agonists acting at P2 purinoceptors on guinea-pig isolated ileum longitudinal smooth muscle have been examined. The preparation contracted in response to ATP, alpha,beta-methylene ATP and 2-methylthio ATP, but not UTP. In this respect, alpha,beta-methylene ATP and 2-methylthio ATP were approximately equipotent and both were 10-50 times more active than ATP. Responses to alpha,beta-methylene ATP, but not 2-methylthio ATP or ATP, were antagonised by atropine and tetrodotoxin, suggesting that alpha,beta-methylene ATP activates cholinergic nerves in the ileum, whilst the other two compounds act on the smooth muscle. Two other purine nucleotide analogues, beta,gamma-methylene ATP and beta,gamma-imido ATP, did not cause contraction. However, both compounds antagonised responses to alpha,beta-methylene ATP, but not those to 2-methylthio ATP. Suramin antagonised responses to both alpha,beta-methylene ATP and 2-methylthio ATP, whilst Cibacron blue was without effect on responses to either agonist. We conclude that the purinoceptor on cholinergic nerves has some of the characteristics of the P2x purinoceptor, whilst the purinoceptor on ileal smooth muscle has some of the characteristics of the P2Y purinoceptor. However, further work will be necessary before definitive classification is possible.

Purinoceptors: are there families of P2X and P2Y purinoceptors?

There has been an exponential growth in interest in purinoceptors since the potent effects of purines were first reported in 1929 and purinoceptors defined in 1978. A distinction between P1 (adenosine) and P2 (ATP/ADP) purinoceptors was recognized at that time and later, A1 and A2, as well as P2x and P2y subclasses of P1 and P2 purinoceptors were also defined. However, in recent years, many new subclasses have been claimed, particularly for the receptors to nucleotides, including P2t, P2z, P2u(n) and P2D, and there is some confusion now about how to incorporate additional discoveries concerning the responses of different tissues to purines. The studies beginning to appear defining the molecular structure of P2-purinoceptor subtypes are clearly going to be important in resolving this problem, as well as the introduction of new compounds that can discriminate pharmacologically between subtypes. Thus, in this review, on the basis of this new data and after a detailed analysis of the literature, we propose that: (1) P2X(ligand-gated) and P2Y(G-protein-coupled) purinoceptor families are established; (2) four subclasses of P2X-purinoceptor can be identified (P2X1-P2X4) to date; (3) the variously named P2-purinoceptors that are G-protein-coupled should be incorporated into numbered subclasses of the P2Y family. Thus: P2Y1 represents the recently cloned P2Y receptor (clone 803) from chick brain; P2Y2 represents the recently cloned P2u (or P2n) receptor from neuroblastoma, human epithelial and rat heart cells; P2Y3 represents the recently cloned P2Y receptor (clone 103) from chick brain that resembles the former P2t receptor; P2Y4-P2Y6 represent subclasses based on agonist potencies of newly synthesised analogues; P2Y7 represents the former P2D receptor for dinucleotides. This new framework for P2 purinoceptors would be fully consistent with what is emerging for the receptors to other major transmitters, such as acetylcholine, gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamate and serotonin, where two main receptor families have been recognised, one mediating fast receptor responses directly linked to an ion channel, the other mediating slower responses through G-proteins. We fully expect discussion on the numbering of the different receptor subtypes within the P2X and P2Y families, but believe that this new way of defining receptors for nucleotides, based on agonist potency order, transduction mechanisms and molecular structure, will give a more ordered and logical approach to accommodating new findings. Moreover, based on the extensive literature analysis that led to this proposal, we suggest that the development of selective antagonists for the different P2-purinoceptor subtypes is now highly desirable, particularly for therapeutic purposes.

Roles of P2-purinoceptors in the cardiovascular system

Characterization of P2-purinoceptor subtypes has facilitated understanding of the many diverse effects produced by purine nucleotides. P2X-Purinoceptors are located on vascular smooth muscle where they mediate vasoconstriction resulting from ATP released as a cotransmitter with noradrenaline from sympathetic nerves. P2Y-Purinoceptors are usually located on the vascular endothelium where they have a role as mediators of vascular relaxation by locally produced ATP. In some vessels, P2Y-purinoceptors are also located on the smooth muscle, perhaps in association with purinergic or sensory nerves, where they can elicit direct relaxation to neuronally released ATP. The net effect of ATP and its analogues on isolated vessels or on vascular beds will be the results of actions mediated by P2X- and P2Y-purinoceptor subtypes, although changes in vascular tone and in integrity of nerves and endothelial cells may alter the balance of the response. Such changes have been observed in diseased states (e.g., atherosclerosis) and may have important implications for the involvement of P2-purinoceptors in, for example, vasospasm. The development of selective and potent antagonists to P2X- and P2Y-purinoceptors has so far remained elusive, and their therapeutic potential can only be guessed.