[3H]cirazoline as a tool for the characterization of imidazoline sites

α- and β-Adrenergic receptors differentially modulate the emission of spontaneous and amphetamine-induced 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in adult rats

Amphetamine (AMPH) increases adult rat 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations, preferentially promoting frequency-modulated (FM) calls that have been proposed to reflect positive affect. The main objective of this study was to investigate a possible noradrenergic contribution to AMPH-induced calling. Adult male Long-Evans rats were tested with AMPH (1 mg/kg intraperitoneal) or saline combined with various systemic pretreatments: clonidine (α2 adrenergic agonist), prazosin (α1 antagonist), atipamezole (α2 antagonist), propranolol, betaxolol, and/or ICI 118,551 (β1/β2, β1, and β2 antagonists, respectively), nadolol (β1/β2 antagonist, peripheral only), or NAD-299 (5HT(1A) antagonist). In addition, effects of cirazoline (α1 adrenergic agonist) and cocaine (0.25-1.5 mg/kg intravenous) were studied alone. AMPH-induced calling was suppressed by low-dose clonidine and prazosin. Cirazoline and atipamezole did not significantly affect calling rate. Propranolol, without affecting the call rate, dose dependently promoted 'flat' calls under AMPH while suppressing 'trills,' thus reversing the effects of AMPH on the 'call subtype profile.' This effect of propranolol seemed to be mediated by simultaneous inhibition of CNS β1 and β2 rather than by 5HT(1A) receptors. Finally, cocaine elicited fewer calls than did AMPH, but produced the same shift in the call subtype profile. Taken together, these results reveal differential drug effects on flat vs trill vs other FM 50-kHz calls. These findings highlight the value of detailed call subtype analyses, and show that 50-kHz calls are associated with adrenergic α1- and β-receptor mechanisms. These preclinical findings suggest that noradrenergic contributions to psychostimulant subjective effects may warrant further investigation.

Disruption of prepulse inhibition after stimulation of central but not peripheral alpha-1 adrenergic receptors

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) refers to the attenuation of startle when a weak prestimulus precedes the startling stimulus. PPI is deficient in several psychiatric illnesses involving poor sensorimotor gating. Previous studies indicate that alpha1 adrenergic receptors regulate PPI, yet the extent to which these effects are mediated by central vs peripheral receptors is unclear. The present studies compared the effects of intracerebroventricular (ICV) vs intraperitoneal (IP) delivery of several alpha1 receptor agonists on PPI. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received either cirazoline (0, 10, 25, 50 microg/5 microl), methoxamine (0, 30, 100 microg/5 microl), or phenylephrine (0, 3, 10, 30 microg/5 microl) ICV immediately before testing. Separate groups received either cirazoline (0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 mg/kg), methoxamine (0, 2, 5, 10 mg/kg), or phenylephrine (0, 0.1, 2.0 mg/kg) IP 5 min before testing. PPI, baseline startle responses, and piloerection, an index of autonomic arousal, were measured. Cirazoline disrupted PPI; effective ICV doses were approximately six times lower than effective IP doses. Methoxamine disrupted PPI after ICV infusion but failed to affect PPI with IP doses that were up to 30-fold higher than the effective ICV dose. Phenylephrine disrupted PPI with ICV administration, but did not alter PPI after IP injection of even a 20-fold higher dose. None of the ICV treatments altered baseline startle magnitude, but phenylephrine and methoxamine lowered startle after administration of high systemic doses. Piloerection was induced by cirazoline via either route of administration, and by IP methoxamine and phenylephrine, but not by ICV infusion of methoxamine or phenylephrine. These findings indicate that alpha1 receptor-mediated PPI disruption occurs exclusively through stimulation of central receptors and is dissociable from alterations in baseline startle or autonomic effects.

Opposite to α2-adrenergic agonists, an imidazoline I1 selective compound does not influence reflex bradycardia in rabbits

This work aimed to study the respective effects of central alpha2-adrenergic receptors (alpha2-ARS) and I1 imidazoline receptors (I1Rs) in the facilitatory effects of imidazoline-like drugs on the reflex bradycardia (RB). Experiments were performed in anaesthetized rabbits. The reflex bradycardic response was induced by phenylephrine injected i.v. LNP 509, rilmenidine and dexmedetomidine were administered intracisternally (i.c.). LNP509 (1 mg/kg, i.c.), a ligand highly selective for I1Rs, induced hypotension (54+/-3 vs. 93+/-2 mm Hg) and bradycardia (260+/-13 vs. 322+/-13 beats/min) (p<0.05, n=5) but did not affect RB. Rilmenidine (1 microg/kg, i.c.), a hybrid ligand which binds to both I1 and alpha2-ARS, also decreased arterial pressure (61+/-2 vs. 101+/-2 mm Hg) and heart rate (260+/-4 vs. 308+/-8) (p<0.01, n=5); it potentiated the RB (maximum R-R interval: 284+/-17 vs. 196+/-6 ms) (p<0.05, n=5). Dexmedetomidine (1 microg/kg, i.c.), a ligand selective for alpha2-ARs, reduced blood pressure (53+/-3 vs. 104+/-2 mm Hg) and heart rate (246+/-4 vs. 312+/-8 beats/min) (p<0.05, n=5) and potentiated the RB (maximum R-R interval: 518+/-38 vs. 194+/-4 ms) (p<0.05, n=5). The potentiation of RB was much greater than that observed with rilmenidine and was significantly prevented by L-NNA injected centrally. This study shows that: (i) an exclusive action on I1Rs which decreases arterial pressure, does not potentiate the RB ii) activation of alpha2-ARs potentiates the RB (iii) the R-R prolongation caused by alpha2-ARs stimulation is prevented by central NOS inhibition.

Presynaptic α1 Adrenergic Receptors Differentially Regulate Synaptic Glutamate and GABA Release to Hypothalamic Presympathetic Neurons

The hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) neurons that project to the spinal intermediolateral cell column and brainstem are important for the control of sympathetic outflow. Stimulation of alpha(1) adrenergic receptors in the PVN increases sympathetic outflow, but the cellular mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, we determined the role of alpha(1) adrenergic receptors in the regulation of glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic inputs to spinally projecting PVN neurons. Whole-cell and cell-attached patch-clamp recordings were performed on retrogradely labeled PVN-spinal neurons in rat brain slices. Bath application of 10 to 100 microM phenylephrine, an alpha(1) adrenergic receptor agonist, significantly increased the frequency of spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents in a concentration-dependent manner. This effect was blocked by the alpha (1)adrenergic receptor antagonists prazosin or corynanthine. Phenylephrine also significantly increased the frequency of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) but not the amplitude and decay constant of mEPSCs. Furthermore, activation of alpha(1) adrenergic receptors with phenylephrine or cirazoline significantly decreased the frequency of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents and miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents, and this effect also was blocked by corynanthine. In addition, 50 microM phenylephrine significantly increased the firing rate of 13 labeled PVN neurons from 3.16 +/- 0.42 to 5.83 +/- 0.65 Hz. However, phenylephrine failed to increase the firing of most labeled PVN neurons in the presence of GABA(A) and ionotropic glutamate receptor antagonists. Thus, these data suggest that activation of alpha (1)adrenergic receptors increases the excitability of PVN presympathetic neurons primarily through augmentation of glutamatergic tone and attenuation of GABAergic inputs.

Differential expression of alpha2-adrenoceptor vs. imidazoline binding sites in postmortem orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala of depressed subjects

Clonidine is a well established antihypertensive agent that is also used effectively to treat a variety of psychiatric disorders. Clonidine is a prototypic imidazoline compound that acts as an alpha(2)-adrenergic agonist but possesses nearly equivalent affinity for non-adrenergic imidazoline binding sites (I-sites). Receptor autoradiography of [(3)H]-clonidine binding presented herein compares densities of alpha(2)-adrenoceptors and I-sites (under a noradrenergic-mask) in Brodmann's area 47 of the left orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and in six amygdaloid nuclei of subjects with major depression (n=12) vs. controls with no psychiatric history (n=11). Postmortem diagnoses were made from psychiatric interviews with next-of-kin. [(3)H]-Clonidine binding to alpha(2)-adrenoceptors in each of six OFC layers was lower, although not reaching statistical significance in any one layer by multivariate analysis, in depressives vs. control subjects. Binding to I-sites was conversely higher in depressives compared to control OFC layers, but did not reach statistical significance alone. However, the ratios of alpha(2)-adrenoceptor : I-sites in all six layers of OFC of depressed subjects were nearly half that of control subjects (P<0.008). In amygdalas from a different group of depressed patients there were no changes in alpha(2)-adrenoceptors or I-sites, or their ratios, compared with controls. The results support previous western blot data indicating a cortex-selective shift away from alpha(2)AR towards I-site preponderance in depressed patients.

Non-adrenergic binding of [3H]atipamezole in rat kidney--regional distribution and comparison to alpha2-adrenoceptors

1 Atipamezole (4-(2-ethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-2-yl)-1H-imidazole) was first introduced as a potent and specific alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist, but in some tissues [3H]atipamezole identifies an additional population of binding sites, distinct from both classical alpha2-adrenoceptors and I1- and I2-imidazoline receptors identified with [3H]para-aminoclonidine or [3H]idazoxan. 2 In the present study we have characterized [3H]atipamezole binding sites in rat kidney by receptor autoradiography and membrane binding assays and determined whether they are pharmacologically identical with the previously described binding sites for [3H]para-aminoclonidine and [3H]idazoxan. [3H]RX821002 and [3H]rauwolscine were used to compare the regional distribution of alpha2-adrenoceptors to that of non-adrenergic binding sites of [3H]atipamezole. 3 Comparative autoradiographic experiments demonstrated the differential localisation of [3H]atipamezole, [3H]RX821002 and [3H]rauwolscine binding sites in rat kidney. The pattern of distribution of non-adrenergic [3H]atipamezole binding sites is clearly distinct from that of alpha2-adrenoceptors. 4 The non-adrenergic binding of [3H]atipamezole in rat kidney does not fall into any of the previously identified three classes of imidazoline receptors studied with [3H]para-aminoclonidine, [3H]idazoxan and [3H]RX821002. 5 Atipamezole had no inhibitory effect on MAO-A or MAO-B activity in renal membranes, which speaks against the involvement of MAOs in the observed radioligand binding.

Imidazoline receptors: from discovery to antihypertensive therapy (facts and doubts)

The hypothesis and indirect evidence of imidazoline receptors has been promoted since some 15 years ago and it gave a substantial impetus for research in this field, resulting in a better understanding of neuronal and cardiovascular regulatory processes. The nomenclature of the imidazoline receptors has been accepted by international forums but no direct proof for the existence of these receptors has been published. Authors summarise the most important available data, including facts and doubts as far as the discovery, characterisation, and function of imidazoline receptors and their subtypes, the differences between imidazoline receptors and alpha-2 adrenoceptors, and also on their participation in regulatory processes.

Imidazoline recognition sites and stomach function

Radioligand binding experiments carried out in cell membranes from rat and human stomach revealed the existence of non-adrenoceptor [3H]clonidine and [3H]idazoxan binding sites and of [3H]DTG (1,2-di-(2-tolyl)guanidine) binding sites. In rat stomach, specific binding was inhibited by imidazolines and guanidines and by non-imidazoline sigma-site ligands, respectively, at different rank orders of affinity, suggesting the existence of non-I1/non-I2 [3H]clonidine binding sites, I2-imidazoline binding sites as well as sigma 2-like-sites. These sites are not directly related to a postsynaptic contractile effect on rat gastric smooth muscle or to acid release from isolated gastric glands. Finally, we demonstrated that the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori is able to form and to release the endogenous imidazoline receptor ligand agmatine and that considerable amounts of agmatine are present in human gastric juice. The quantities of agmatine were higher in gastric juice from H. pylori-positive than H. pylori-negative patients.

Current status of putative imidazoline (I1) receptors and renal mechanisms in relation to their antihypertensive therapeutic potential

1. A 'second generation' of centrally acting antihypertensive agents has recently been developed. Unlike the 'first generation' of these agents (e.g. alpha-methyldopa, clonidine, guanabenz), which act predominantly by an agonist action at a alpha 2-adrenoceptors, these agents (e.g. rilmenidine, moxonidine) are believed to exert their antihypertensive effects chiefly by an interaction at putative imidazoline (I) receptors of the I1-type, and so have a reduced profile of alpha 2-adrenoceptor-mediated side effects. There is also evidence from studies in experimental animals that activation of I1-receptors mediates a natriuretic effect. This review evaluates the evidence that they mediate renal effects different from those of alpha 2-adrenoceptors that could contribute to their long-term efficacy. 2. Data from binding studies suggest that I1-binding sites are heterogeneous. There is conflicting evidence concerning whether any of these binding sites are truly receptors. Indeed, the best evidence for the existence of I1-receptors comes from in vivo experiments indicating that imidazoline compounds act at non-adrenoceptor receptive sites in the central nervous system to reduce sympathetic drive and blood pressure. 3. There are a wide range of potential sites and mechanisms through which centrally acting antihypertensive agents can affect renal function, including actions mediated within the central nervous system, heart, systemic circulation and within the kidneys themselves. 'First generation' centrally acting antihypertensive agents cause diuresis and natriuresis in rats, while in dogs and humans a diuresis is often seen with variable effects on sodium excretion. 4. Evidence from studies in anaesthetized rats indicates that rilmenidine and moxonidine can promote sodium excretion by interacting with both central nervous system and renal putative I1-receptors. This does not appear to necessarily be the case in other species. At this time there are few or no published data from clinical studies to suggest that 'second generation' centrally acting antihypertensive agents affect salt and water balance differently from 'first generation' agents.