Effects of photodynamic treatment of platelets or endothelial cells in vitro on platelet aggregation

Photodynamic Therapy-Current Limitations and Novel Approaches

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) mostly relies on the generation of singlet oxygen, via the excitation of a photosensitizer, so that target tumor cells can be destroyed. PDT can be applied in the settings of several malignant diseases. In fact, the earliest preclinical applications date back to 1900’s. Dougherty reported the treatment of skin tumors by PDT in 1978. Several further studies around 1980 demonstrated the effectiveness of PDT. Thus, the technique has attracted the attention of numerous researchers since then. Hematoporphyrin derivative received the FDA approval as a clinical application of PDT in 1995. We have indeed witnessed a considerable progress in the field over the last century. Given the fact that PDT has a favorable adverse event profile and can enhance anti-tumor immune responses as well as demonstrating minimally invasive characteristics, it is disappointing that PDT is not broadly utilized in the clinical setting for the treatment of malignant and/or non-malignant diseases. Several issues still hinder the development of PDT, such as those related with light, tissue oxygenation and inherent properties of the photosensitizers. Various photosensitizers have been designed/synthesized in order to overcome the limitations. In this Review, we provide a general overview of the mechanisms of action in terms of PDT in cancer, including the effects on immune system and vasculature as well as mechanisms related with tumor cell destruction. We will also briefly mention the application of PDT for non-malignant diseases. The current limitations of PDT utilization in cancer will be reviewed, since identifying problems associated with design/synthesis of photosensitizers as well as application of light and tissue oxygenation might pave the way for more effective PDT approaches. Furthermore, novel promising approaches to improve outcome in PDT such as selectivity, bioengineering, subcellular/organelle targeting, etc. will also be discussed in detail, since the potential of pioneering and exceptional approaches that aim to overcome the limitations and reveal the full potential of PDT in terms of clinical translation are undoubtedly exciting. A better understanding of novel concepts in the field (e.g. enhanced, two-stage, fractional PDT) will most likely prove to be very useful for pursuing and improving effective PDT strategies.

Attritional evaluation of lipophilic and hydrophilic metallated phthalocyanines for oncological photodynamic therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Oncological photodynamic therapy (PDT) relies on photosensitizers (PSs) to photo-oxidatively destroy tumor cells. Currently approved PSs yield satisfactory results in superficial and easy-to-access tumors but are less suited for solid cancers in internal organs such as the biliary system and the pancreas. For these malignancies, second-generation PSs such as metallated phthalocyanines are more appropriate. Presently it is not known which of the commonly employed metallated phtahlocyanines, namely aluminum phthalocyanine (AlPC) and zinc phthalocyanine (ZnPC) as well as their tetrasulfonated derivatives AlPCS4 and ZnPCS4, is most cytotoxic to tumor cells. This study therefore employed an attritional approach to ascertain the best metallated phthalocyanine for oncological PDT in a head-to-head comparative analysis and standardized experimental design.

METHODS

ZnPC and AlPC were encapsulated in PEGylated liposomes. Analyses were performed in cultured A431 cells as a template for tumor cells with a dysfunctional P53 tumor suppressor gene and EGFR overexpression. First, dark toxicity was assessed as a function of PS concentration using the WST-1 and sulforhodamine B assay. Second, time-dependent uptake and intracellular distribution were determined by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy, respectively, using the intrinsic fluorescence of the PSs. Third, the LC₅₀ values were established for each PS at 671 nm and a radiant exposure of 15 J/cm² following 1-h PS exposure. Finally, the mode of cell death as a function of post-PDT time and cell cycle arrest at 24 h after PDT were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the absence of illumination, AlPC and ZnPC were not toxic to cells up to a 1.5-μM PS concentration and exposure for up to 72 h. Dark toxicity was noted for AlPCS4 at 5 μM and ZnPCS4 at 2.5 μM. Uptake of all PSs was observed as early as 1 min after PS addition to cells and increased in amplitude during a 2-h incubation period. After 60 min, the entire non-nuclear space of the cell was photosensitized, with PS accumulation in multiple subcellular structures, especially in case of AlPC and AlPCS4. PDT of cells photosensitized with ZnPC, AlPC, and AlPCS4 yielded LC₅₀ values of 0.13 μM, 0.04 μM, and 0.81 μM, respectively, 24 h post-PDT (based on sulforhodamine B assay). ZnPCS4 did not induce notable phototoxicity, which was echoed in the mode of cell death and cell cycle arrest data. At 4 h post-PDT, the mode of cell death comprised mainly apoptosis for ZnPC and AlPC, the extent of which was gradually exacerbated in AlPC-photosensitized cells during 8 h. ZnPC-treated cells seemed to recover at 8 h post-PDT compared to 4 h post-PDT, which had been observed before in another cell line. AlPCS4 induced considerable necrosis in addition to apoptosis, whereby most of the cell death had already manifested at 2 h after PDT. During the course of 8 h, necrotic cell death transitioned into mainly late apoptotic cell death. Cell death signaling coincided with a reduction in cells in the G₀/G₁ phase (ZnPC, AlPC, AlPCS4) and cell cycle arrest in the S-phase (ZnPC, AlPC, AlPCS4) and G₂ phase (ZnPC and AlPC). Cell cycle arrest was most profound in cells that had been photosensitized with AlPC and subjected to PDT.

CONCLUSIONS

Liposomal AlPC is the most potent PS for oncological PDT, whereas ZnPCS4 was photodynamically inert in A431 cells. AlPC did not induce dark toxicity at PS concentrations of up to 1.5 μM, i.e., > 37 times the LC₅₀ value, which is favorable in terms of clinical phototoxicity issues. AlPC photosensitized multiple intracellular loci, which was associated with extensive, irreversible cell death signaling that is expected to benefit treatment efficacy and possibly immunological long-term tumor control, granted that sufficient AlPC will reach the tumor in vivo. Given the differential pharmacokinetics, intracellular distribution, and cell death dynamics, liposomal AlPC may be combined with AlPCS4 in a PS cocktail to further improve PDT efficacy.

Photodynamic therapy, priming and optical imaging: Potential co-conspirators in treatment design and optimization - a Thomas Dougherty Award for Excellence in PDT paper

Photodynamic therapy is a photochemistry-based approach, approved for the treatment of several malignant and non-malignant pathologies. It relies on the use of a non-toxic, light activatable chemical, photosensitizer, which preferentially accumulates in tissues/cells and, upon irradiation with the appropriate wavelength of light, confers cytotoxicity by generation of reactive molecular species. The preferential accumulation however is not universal and, depending on the anatomical site, the ratio of tumor to normal tissue may be reversed in favor of normal tissue. Under such circumstances, control of the volume of light illumination provides a second handle of selectivity. Singlet oxygen is the putative favorite reactive molecular species although other entities such as nitric oxide have been credibly implicated. Typically, most photosensitizers in current clinical use have a finite quantum yield of fluorescence which is exploited for surgery guidance and can also be incorporated for monitoring and treatment design. In addition, the photodynamic process alters the cellular, stromal, and/or vascular microenvironment transiently in a process termed photodynamic priming, making it more receptive to subsequent additional therapies including chemo- and immunotherapy. Thus, photodynamic priming may be considered as an enabling technology for the more commonly used frontline treatments. Recently, there has been an increase in the exploitation of the theranostic potential of photodynamic therapy in different preclinical and clinical settings with the use of new photosensitizer formulations and combinatorial therapeutic options. The emergence of nanomedicine has further added to the repertoire of photodynamic therapy's potential and the convergence and co-evolution of these two exciting tools is expected to push the barriers of smart therapies, where such optical approaches might have a special niche. This review provides a perspective on current status of photodynamic therapy in anti-cancer and anti-microbial therapies and it suggests how evolving technologies combined with photochemically-initiated molecular processes may be exploited to become co-conspirators in optimization of treatment outcomes. We also project, at least for the short term, the direction that this modality may be taking in the near future.

Self-assembled core-shell nanoparticles for combined chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy of resistant head and neck cancers

Combination therapy enhances anticancer efficacy of both drugs via synergistic effects. We report here nanoscale coordination polymer (NCP)-based core-shell nanoparticles carrying high payloads of cisplatin and the photosensitizer pyrolipid, NCP@pyrolipid, for combined chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy (PDT). NCP@pyrolipid releases cisplatin and pyrolipid in a triggered manner to synergistically induce cancer cell apoptosis and necrosis. In vivo pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies in mice show prolonged blood circulation times, low uptake in normal organs, and high tumor accumulation of cisplatin and pyrolipid. Compared to monotherapy, NCP@pyrolipid shows superior potency and efficacy in tumor regression (83% reduction in tumor volume) at low drug doses in the cisplatin-resistant human head and neck cancer SQ20B xenograft murine model. We elucidated the in vitro/vivo fate of the lipid layer and its implications on the mechanisms of actions. This study suggests multifunctional NCP core-shell nanoparticles as a versatile and effective drug delivery system for potential translation to the clinic.

Mechanisms in photodynamic therapy: part two-cellular signaling, cell metabolism and modes of cell death

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been known for over a hundred years, but is only now becoming widely used. Originally developed as a tumor therapy, some of its most successful applications are for non-malignant disease. In the second of a series of three reviews, we will discuss the mechanisms that operate in PDT on a cellular level. In Part I [Castano AP, Demidova TN, Hamblin MR. Mechanism in photodynamic therapy: part one-photosensitizers, photochemistry and cellular localization. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther 2004;1:279-93] it was shown that one of the most important factors governing the outcome of PDT, is how the photosensitizer (PS) interacts with cells in the target tissue or tumor, and the key aspect of this interaction is the subcellular localization of the PS. PS can localize in mitochondria, lysosomes, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus and plasma membranes. An explosion of investigation and explorations in the field of cell biology have elucidated many of the pathways that mammalian cells undergo when PS are delivered in tissue culture and subsequently illuminated. There is an acute stress response leading to changes in calcium and lipid metabolism and production of cytokines and stress proteins. Enzymes particularly, protein kinases, are activated and transcription factors are expressed. Many of the cellular responses are centered on mitochondria. These effects frequently lead to induction of apoptosis either by the mitochondrial pathway involving caspases and release of cytochrome c, or by pathways involving ceramide or death receptors. However, under certain circumstances cells subjected to PDT die by necrosis. Although there have been many reports of DNA damage caused by PDT, this is not thought to be an important cell-death pathway. This mechanistic research is expected to lead to optimization of PDT as a tumor treatment, and to rational selection of combination therapies that include PDT as a component.

Photodynamic Therapy (PDT): PDT Mechanisms

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a light based therapy used to ablate tumors. As practiced in oncology a photosensitizing agent is applied and then activated by a specific wavelength and energy of light. This light energy in the presence of oxygen will lead to the creation of the photodynamic reaction which is cyto and vasculo toxic. This paper will review the mechanisms of action of PDT and how they may be manipulated to improve clinical outcome in cancer patients.

Angiogenesis inhibition for the improvement of photodynamic therapy: the revival of a promising idea

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a minimally invasive form of treatment, which is clinically approved for the treatment of angiogenic disorders, including certain forms of cancer and neovascular eye diseases. Although the concept of PDT has existed for a long time now, it has never made a solid entrance into the clinical management of cancer. This is likely due to secondary tissue reactions, such as inflammation and neoangiogenesis. The recent development of clinically effective angiogenesis inhibitors has lead to the initiation of research on the combination of PDT with such angiostatic targeted therapies. Preclinical studies in this research field have shown promising results, causing a revival in the field of PDT. This review reports on the current research efforts on PDT and vascular targeted combination therapies. Different combination strategies with angiogenesis inhibition and vascular targeting approaches are discussed. In addition, the concept of increasing PDT selectivity by targeted delivery of photosensitizers is presented. Furthermore, the current insights on sequencing the therapy arms of such combinations will be discussed in light of vascular normalization induced by angiogenesis inhibition.

Photodynamic therapy of age-related macular degeneration: History and principles

We briefly review the history and principles of photodynamic therapy (PDT), especially as it is applied to choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in age-related macular degeneration (AMD). After a brief general history of PDT, we discuss the relationship between the physicochemical structure and photodynamic activity of the second-generation photosensitizers, such as those in current clinical use. We then discuss the basic photophysics of photosensitizer molecules, and describe the initial chemical reactions induced by activated sensitizers. We outline a novel method for screening photosensitizers to be used in treating CNV, as well as the complex biomolecular pathways modulated by PDT-induced oxidative stress and the vascular effects of PDT in solid tumors. The paper closes with a discussion of how all this information might be used to improve the selectivity and efficacy of clinically useful photosensitizers.

Photodynamic therapy and anti-tumour immunity

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) uses non-toxic photosensitizers and harmless visible light in combination with oxygen to produce cytotoxic reactive oxygen species that kill malignant cells by apoptosis and/or necrosis, shut down the tumour microvasculature and stimulate the host immune system. In contrast to surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy that are mostly immunosuppressive, PDT causes acute inflammation, expression of heat-shock proteins, invasion and infiltration of the tumour by leukocytes, and might increase the presentation of tumour-derived antigens to T cells.

Photodynamic treatment in a rabbit model of glaucoma surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of postoperative verteporfin photodynamic treatment as an adjunct to glaucoma experimental filtration surgery in rabbits.

METHODS

Dutch belted (n = 15) rabbits underwent full thickness sclerectomy in one eye. The experimental group (group 1, n = 7) underwent i.v. injection of verteporfin and subsequent photoactivation at the operative site on postoperative day 1 (POD 1). Control groups of animals received either light exposure (group 2, n = 4) or verteporfin (group 3, n = 2), or no intervention (group 4, n = 2). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured prior to the procedure (POD 0) and daily thereafter for the first week after sclerectomy (PODs 1-7) and every other day for the second week (PODs 9, 11, 13, 15). Percentage IOP reductions of operated over contralateral control eyes were compared among the various groups. Success rates (percentage IOP reduction > 15%) were also compared between the experimental and control groups. Eyes were histologically examined for evaluation of fibrosis.

RESULTS

Rabbits in the experimental group (group 1) had a mean +/- SEM percentage IOP reduction of 25 +/- 3% during the follow-up period. In contrast, groups 2, 3 and 4 had IOP reductions of 4 +/- 5%, 12 +/- 7% and 4 +/- 6%, respectively (p < 0.005, anova among all four groups). Successful IOP reduction (> or = 15%) over the contralateral eye at POD 15 was achieved in six of seven experimental animals, but only in one of eight control animals (p < 0.02, chi-squared test). Bleb failure occurred significantly earlier in the control eyes compared with eyes receiving PDT (p < 0.003, log rank test). Blebs in the experimental group differed from those in the control groups histologically, lacking significant collagen deposition in the area of the sclerostomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Wound healing in glaucoma surgery may be successfully modulated postoperatively using photodynamic therapy with i.v. administered photosensitizer.

Intracellular signaling mechanisms in photodynamic therapy

In photodynamic therapy (PDT) a sensitizer, light and oxygen are used to induce death of tumor cells and in the treatment of certain noncancerous conditions. Cell death in PDT may occur by apoptosis or by necrosis, depending on the sensitizer, on the PDT dose and on the cell genotype. Some sensitizers that have been used in PDT are accumulated in the mitochondria, and this may explain their efficiency in inducing apoptotic cell death, both in vitro and in vivo. In this review we will focus on the events that characterize apoptotic death in PDT and on the intracellular signaling events that are set in motion in photosensitized cells. Activation of phospholipases, changes in ceramide metabolism, a rise in the cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration, stimulation of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), changes in protein phosphorylation and alterations in the activity of transcription factors and on gene expression have all been observed in PDT-treated cells. Although many of these metabolic reactions contribute to the demise process, some of them may antagonize cell death. Understanding the signaling mechanisms in PDT may provide means to modulate the PDT effects at the molecular level and potentiate its antitumor effectiveness.

Platelet adhesion to photodynamic therapy-treated extracellular matrix proteins

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) produces reactive species that alter vascular wall biology and vessel wall proteins. In this study, we examined platelet adhesion to PDT-treated (photosensitizer = Photofrin; fluence 100 J/cm2; lambda = 630 nm) extracellular matrix (ECM), fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor (vWF) and collagen Types I and III, under flow conditions in a recirculating perfusion chamber. Platelet adhesion was quantified by image analysis. The effect of PDT on vWF was assessed by measuring the binding of domain-specific antibodies to treated vWF. PDT significantly decreased platelet adhesion to the ECM, fibrinogen and vWF. However, PDT of collagen resulted in significantly increased platelet adhesion, with large aggregate formation. PDT affected mostly the A1 (glycoprotein [GP]-Ib-binding site), A2 and A3 (collagen-binding site) domains of vWF but not the D'-D3 (factor VIII-binding site) and B-C1 (GP-IIb/IIIa-binding site) domains. In conclusion, PDT can alter the ECM, resulting in decreased platelet adhesion. However, vessels with high collagen content, such as veins and small arteries, may become increasingly prone to thrombosis. The results of this study may thus play a role in understanding the thrombogenic properties and mechanisms of vascular PDT.

The effects of thrombocytopenia on vessel stasis and macromolecular leakage after photodynamic therapy using photofrin

Several studies have reported thrombus formation and/or the release of specific vasoactive eicosanoids, suggesting that platelet activation or damage after photodynamic therapy (PDT) may contribute to blood flow stasis. The role of circulating platelets on blood flow stasis and vascular leakage of macromolecules during and after PDT was assessed in an intravital animal model. Sprague-Dawley rats bearing chondrosarcoma on the right hind limb were injected intravenously (i.v.) with 25 mg/kg Photofrin 24 h before light treatment of 135 J/cm2 at 630 nm. Thrombocytopenia was induced in animals by administration of 3.75 mg/kg of rabbit anti-rat platelet antibody i.v. 30 min before the initiation of the light treatment. This regimen reduced circulating platelet levels from 300,000/mm3 to 20,000/mm3. Reductions in the luminal diameter of the microvasculature in normal muscle and tumor were observed in control animals given Photofrin and light. Venule leakage of macromolecules was noted shortly after the start of light treatment and continued throughout the period of observation. Animals made thrombocytopenic showed none of these changes after PDT in either normal tissues or tumor. The lack of vessel response correlated with the absence of thromboxane release in blood during PDT. These data suggest that platelets and eicosanoid release are necessary for vessel constriction and blood flow stasis after PDT using Photofrin.

Photodynamic efficacy of naturally occurring porphyrins in endothelial cells in vitro and microvasculature in vivo

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been described in terms of cellular and vascular effects. The precise mechanisms of cellular and vascular damage are still unknown. In this study, the photodynamic inactivation of endothelial cells in vitro and damage to the microvasculature in vivo by naturally occurring porphyrins (uroporphyrin III (UP), coproporphyrin III (CP) and protoporphyrin IX (PP)) were investigated. The chick chorioallantoic membrane model (CAM model) was used, which is convenient for the study of damage to the microcirculation induced by PDT. The hydrophilic porphyrins UP and CP exhibited low cytotoxicity towards endothelial cells. Only small amounts of UP and CP were taken up, resulting in weak inactivation after irradiation. In contrast, the more lipophilic PP showed a marked cytotoxicity. Considerable amounts of PP were accumulated in the cells, leading to pronounced inactivation after light exposure. For the three porphyrins, damage to the microvasculature was observed. The damage caused by the hydrophilic porphyrins UP and CP was strongly dependent on the drug and light dose. For vascular injury, the efficacy was graded as UP < CP < PP.

The biology of photodynamic therapy

The subcellular, cellular and tissue/tumour interactions with non-toxic photosensitizing chemicals plus non-thermal visible light (photodynamic therapy (PDT) are reviewed. The extent to which endothelium/vasculature is the primary target is discussed, and the biochemical opportunities for manipulating outcome highlighted. The nature of tumour destruction by PDT lends itself to imaging outcome by MRI and PET.

Vascular effects of photodynamic therapy

Vascular damage and blood flow stasis are consequences of photodynamic therapy (PDT) of solid tumors using many photosensitizers. Microvascular stasis and resulting hypoxia are effective means to produce cytotoxicity and tumor regression. The observation of blood flow stasis after photodynamic therapy results from a combination of damage to sensitive sites within the microvasculature and the resulting physiological responses to this damage. A generalized hypothesis for the mechanisms leading to vessel stasis begins with perturbation and damage to endothelial cells during light treatment of photosensitized tissues. Endothelial cell damage leads to the establishment of thrombogenic sites within the vessel lumen and this initiates a physiological cascade of responses including platelet aggregation, the release of vasoactive molecules, leukocyte adhesion, increases in vascular permeability, and vessel constriction. These effects from damage combine to produce blood flow stasis.

Cellular targets and molecular responses associated with photodynamic therapy

The positive clinical results associated with photodynamic therapy (PDT) have led to an expanded need to identify the cellular targets and molecular responses associated with this treatment. Increased knowledge regarding the mechanisms of action associated with PDT-mediated cytotoxicity should contribute to the continued advancement of this therapy. This report focuses on recent studies analyzing PDT resistance and examining stress protein and early response gene activation induced by photosensitizer mediated oxidative stress. Recurring observations from these studies indicate that subcellular targets and cellular responses associated with PDT can vary significantly for different photosensitizers.

Photofrin II induces cytokine secretion by mouse spleen cells and human peripheral mononuclear cells

The aim of our study was to find out if Photofrin II, a cytotoxic drug used routinely in photodynamic therapy (PDT), can induce immune responses in vitro, and to compare its effects with those of the protoporphyrin 9, hemin, which also has antitumor properties. We tested the effect of these porphyrins on lymphocyte proliferation and secretion of interleukin-2, interleukin-3, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) and interferon gamma (IFNgamma), by human or murine mononuclear cells (MNC) without an activating light. Both the Photofrin II- and hemin-treated cells showed a significant increase in cytokine secretion in the presence of suboptimal concentrations of mitogen. Moreover, Photofrin II and hemin significantly increased production of TNFalpha and IFNgamma even in the absence of mitogen. The cellular binding sites of Photofrin II and hemin to MNC were localized by electromicroscopy or fluorescence. Combined stimulation of cells by mitogens and porphyrins maintained optimal vital ionic balance of potassium, sodium and chlorine in the lymphocytes. In the cells thus treated there was a significant increase in intracellular calcium, a vital second messenger for lymphokine secretion. We demonstrate that the effect of Photofrin II on the immune system involves enhanced cytokine secretion which may account for the subsequent tumor eradication by PDT.

Enhanced macrophage cytotoxicity against tumor cells treated with photodynamic therapy

In vitro treatment of human lung adenocarcinoma cells A549 with photofrin-based photodynamic therapy (PDT) resulted in the potentiation of macrophage-mediated killing of these cells assayed either by measuring 3H-thymidine release from the prelabeled target cells, or by determining the survival of A549 cells based on colony formation. The effector cells in these experiments were human promyelocytic leukemia cells HL60 induced to differentiate into macrophages. Very similar results were obtained with the murine squamous carcinoma SCCVII cells treated with PDT and subsequently admixed with mouse peritoneal macrophages. This effect increased with PDT dose and reached its maximum (i.e. complete or nearly complete release of the radioactive label) with the photodynamic treatment that was lethal to 40-50% of cells. In contrast, the PDT treatment of normal mouse kidney cells resulted in only a very limited enhancement of their cytolysis by mouse peritoneal macrophages. The exposure of A549 cells to X-ray irradiation had not affected the macrophage-mediated killing of these cells. The PDT survival curves of A549 cells cultured either alone or with the effector cells showed that the presence of macrophages even at very low effector: target cells ratios enhanced the PDT response of tumor cells. The enhancement ratio of 3.6 (at S = 0.01) was achieved with the effector: target cell ratio 2.5:1, which was the highest ratio tested with this assay. It is suggested that macrophages may recognize potentially repairable damage induced by PDT in tumor cells (presumably lipid fragments exposed in damaged cellular membranes), which helps them to identify the affected cells as their targets.

The effects of thromboxane inhibitors on the microvascular and tumor response to photodynamic therapy

Vascular stasis and tissue ischemia are known to cause tumor cell death in several experimental models after photodynamic therapy (PDT); however, the mechanisms leading to this damage remain unclear. Because previous studies indicated that thromboxane release is implicated in vessel damage, we further examined the role of thromboxane in PDT. Rats bearing chondrosarcoma were injected with 25 mg/kg Photofrin (intravenously) 24 h before treatment. Light (135 J/cm2, 630 nm) was delivered to the tumor area after injection of one of the following inhibitors: (1) R68070: a thromboxane synthetase inhibitor; (2) SQ-29548: a thromboxane receptor antagonist; and (3) Flunarizine: an inhibitor of platelet shape change. Systemic thromboxane levels were determined. Vessel constriction and leakage were evaluated by intravital microscopy. Tumor response was assessed after treatment. Thromboxane levels were decreased more than 50% with SQ-29548 as compared to controls. Thromboxane levels in animals given R68070 and Flunarizine remained at baseline levels. SQ-29548 and R68070 reduced vessel constriction compared to controls, while Flunarizine totally prevented vessel constriction. R68070 and SQ-29548 inhibited vessel permeability compared to PDT controls; Flunarizine did not. Animals given these inhibitors showed markedly reduced tumor cure. These results indicate that the release of thromboxane is linked to the vascular response in PDT.

The effects of photodynamic therapy using differently substituted zinc phthalocyanines on vessel constriction, vessel leakage and tumor response

The effects of four different zinc phthalocyanines were studied during and after photodynamic therapy (PDT). Measurements of vessel constriction, vessel leakage, tumor interstitial pressure, eicosanoid release, and tumor response of chondrosarcoma were made in Sprague-Dawley rats. Animals were injected intravenously with 1 mumol/kg of mono-, di-, or tetrasulfonated zinc phthalocyanine, or 1 mumol/kg of a zinc phthalocyanine substituted with four tertiary butyl groups. Tissues were exposed to 400 J/cm2 670 nm light 24 h after photosensitizer injection. An additional group of animals was given indomethacin before treatment. The use of the monosulfonated and tertiary butyl substituted zinc phthalocyanines in PDT caused the release of specific eicosanoids, caused vessel constriction, and induced venule leakage and increases in tumor interstitial pressure. Tumor cures of 27% and 7% were observed. Photodynamic therapy using the disulfonated zinc phthalocyanine did not induce vessel constriction or the release of eicosanoids, however, tumor cure was 43%. The use of the tetrasulfonated zinc phthalocyanine caused intermediate effects between the mono- and disulfonated compounds. The administration of indomethacin to animals completely inhibited the effects of PDT using the monosulfonated compound but had minimal effects on treatment using the disulfonated compound. This suggests that the monosulfonated and disulfonated compounds act by different mechanisms of destruction.