UVA II exposure of human skin results in decreased immunization capacity, increased induction of tolerance and a unique pattern of epidermal antigen-presenting cell alteration

Cutaneous malignancies: melanoma and nonmelanoma types

This article reviews melanoma and nonmelanoma cutaneous malignancies.

An action spectrum for ultraviolet radiation-induced immunosuppression in humans

BACKGROUND

The immune-suppressive effects of sunlight play a central role in skin carcinogenesis. Ultraviolet (UV) B radiation is highly immunosuppressive even at suberythemal doses, and longwave UVA is now also recognized to cause immunosuppression in humans. The relative contributions of UVA and UVB to immunosuppression by incidental daily sun exposure are, however, unclear.

OBJECTIVES

We previously determined wavelength dependencies for immunosuppression by UVB and UVA wavebands in humans. We now aimed to calculate relative and solar immune-suppressive effectiveness across the UVB and UVA spectra.

METHODS

We used the nickel model of recall contact hypersensitivity to determine UV immunosuppression dose responses and minimum immune suppression doses (MISDs) at 11 narrowbands from 289 to 392 nm. The relative immune-suppressive effectiveness of each narrowband was then determined as 1/MISD vs. wavelength. This curve was multiplied by the solar spectrum to show the relative immune-suppressive effectiveness of each waveband in sunlight.

RESULTS

We found peaks of immune-suppressive effectiveness in the UVB waveband at 300 nm and in the UVA at 370 nm. Because of the far greater amount of longwave UVA in sunlight, the relative solar immune-suppressive effectiveness of UVA was threefold higher than that of UVB at doses equivalent to sun exposure from normal daily activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Longwave UVA, which abuts the visible light spectrum and is less effectively filtered by sunscreens than UVB, is likely to be the largest contributor to immunosuppression resulting from incidental daily sun exposure.

Broad-spectrum sunscreens provide better protection from solar ultraviolet-simulated radiation and natural sunlight-induced immunosuppression in human beings

BACKGROUND

It is well established that ultraviolet (UV) radiation induces immunomodulatory effects that may be involved in skin cancer. Recent studies have shown that UVA (320-400 nm) and UVB (290-320 nm) radiation are immunosuppressive. As a result, sunscreens, which mainly absorb UVB, may be less effective in preventing UV radiation-induced immunosuppression than broad-spectrum products.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to study the effects of UVA exposure on human delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response and compare the efficacy of sunscreens having different levels of sun-protection factor (SPF) and UVA protection against both solar-simulated radiation and outdoor real-life sunlight exposure conditions.

METHODS

DTH was assessed using a kit which includes 7 recall antigens that most of the participants encountered during childhood immunization. Evaluation of DTH test response was made 48 hours after test application before and after UV exposure with or without sunscreens.

RESULTS

In unprotected participants, the response to DTH tests was significantly reduced irrespective of UV types of exposure (full-spectrum UVA, long UVA, solar-simulated radiation). A UVB sunscreen failed to protect from solar-simulated radiation-induced immunosuppression. In contrast, a broad-spectrum sunscreen with the same SPF but providing a high protection in the UVA range significantly reduced local UV-induced immunosuppression and prevented the distant effects. In the outdoor study, as compared with DTH responses obtained before sun exposure, no alteration of immune response was detected when the skin was protected by a broad-spectrum sunscreen having a high protection level in the UVA (SPF 25, UVA protection factor 14). Conversely a broad-spectrum sunscreen with lower protection against UVA (SPF 25, UVA protection factor 6) failed to prevent UV-impaired response.

LIMITATIONS

These results have been obtained after repeated exposure. Additional experiments obtained under acute exposure are in progress.

CONCLUSION

These findings clearly demonstrated the role of UVA in the induction of photoimmunosuppression together with the need for sunscreen products providing efficient photoprotection throughout the entire UV spectrum.

Photoprotection of bacterial-derived melanin against ultraviolet A-induced cell death and its potential application as an active sunscreen

BACKGROUND

The increase in the incidence of non-melanoma skin tumours, photoaging, and immunosuppression demand for more effective sunscreen on ultraviolet A (UVA) irradiation.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study is to evaluate the photoprotective effects of a bacterial-derived melanin against UVA-induced damages in vitro and in vivo. Methods Human fibroblasts were used to assess the role of the bacterial-derived melanin on cell viability against UVA. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay and nuclear morphology were employed to evaluate the photoprotection at the cellular level. Fluorometric assays were performed to detect the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the cells. Evaluations of the bacterial-derived melanin as a sunscreen were measured by transmission test and persistent pigment darkening on human skin.

RESULTS

Bacterial-derived melanin efficiently scavenged ROS in the fibroblasts after UVA irradiation. The cell viability of xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) fibroblast treated with varied doses of melanin increased dramatically in comparison with untreated control and the treated XP fibroblasts became more resistant to UVA-induced apoptosis than normal fibroblasts. Although the relative transmission didn't change too much with different concentration of bacterial-derived melanin, this melanin could keep UVA-irradiated skin from pigment darkening and act as an active sunscreen on skin.

CONCLUSIONS

The bacterial-derived melanin provided significant protection to fibroblast cell and human skin against the UVA radiation. It has the potential to be developed as an active sunscreen for the patients with photosensitivity skin to sun exposure.

Decreased human epidermal antigen-presenting cell activity after ultraviolet A exposure: dose–response effects and protection by sunscreens

BACKGROUND

Ultraviolet (UV) exposure of human skin causes immunosuppression that contributes to the growth of skin cancer. The contribution of UVA in these processes is still a matter of debate.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of our study was first to find a dose-response effect of UVA exposure on human epidermal antigen-presenting cell (APC) activity and to evaluate the protective capacity of two sunscreen formulations against a high level of acute UVA exposure. We also tried to evaluate the protective capacity afforded by the same sunscreens against UVA-induced clinical changes such as redness and pigmentation.

METHODS

The functional assessment of the alloantigen-presenting capacity of epidermal cells prepared from skin keratotome samples 3 days after UVA exposure was measured with a mixed epidermal cell-lymphocyte reaction (MECLR) in each healthy volunteer (n = 16). Redness and pigmentation were assessed by chromametry 24 h after exposure to a single UVA dose.

RESULTS

In vivo UVA exposure to 15, 30 and 60 J cm(-2) resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in purified allogeneic T cell (CD4+ T cells) proliferation induced by UVA-irradiated epidermal cells. The epidermal APC function was significantly decreased with a suberythemal exposure corresponding to 15 J cm(-2). The decrease, partial and not statistically different between 30 and 60 J cm(-2), exhibits a plateau-response effect. There was no correlation between the decrease of the epidermal APC function and the intensity of erythema and persistent pigment darkening. Both sunscreen formulations strongly inhibited the UVA-induced reduction of MECLR at 90 J cm(-2).

CONCLUSION

Our results clearly demonstrate that UVA impairs the APC activity of the epidermal cells and thus may contribute to UV-induced immunosuppression in humans. They also indicate that erythema and immunosuppression have different dose-response curves in the UVA range. The two sunscreen formulations afforded a significant protection against the decrease in epidermal APC activity induced by exposure to a high UVA dose (90 J cm(-2)).

The induction of immunity to a protein antigen using an adjuvant is significantly compromised by ultraviolet A radiation

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation from sunlight causes skin cancer and inhibits priming of the immune system during vaccination. However the dose related effects of the different components of sunlight (UVA and UVB) are complex and require further investigation. Using ovalbumin as a model protein vaccine with saponin as adjuvant we show that both UVA and UVB can suppress the DTH response to a poorly immunogenic protein. Increasing doses of UVB induced increased levels of immunosuppression and tolerance. UVA however, caused a bi-phasic dose response with intermediate but not low or high doses causing primary immunosuppression. No dose of UVA caused significant tolerance. Similar results were observed in both C57BL/6 and Balb/c mice. Our data confirms the complex immunomodulatory dose effects of UVA and UVB for a protein antigen, and shows that both UVB and UVA can suppress immunity induced by a protein with adjuvant. This highlights the importance of considering sun exposure patterns in the future success of both preventing skin cancer development and enhancing vaccination regimes.

Occupational Sun Exposure and Mycosis Fungoides: A European Multicenter Case???Control Study

OBJECTIVE

We sought to study the association between occupational sun exposure and mycosis fungoides (MF), a peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A European multicenter case-control study including seven rare cases (one being MF) was conducted between 1995 and 1997. From the 118 accepted cases, 104 were interviewed, of which 76 were definite cases. Population controls were selected randomly from the regions of case ascertainment. Information based on occupational experiences was coded according to industry types. A job exposure matrix was created according to the expected exposure to sunlight.

RESULTS

Once exposures to aromatic halogenated hydrocarbons were eliminated (odds ratio = 2.3; 95% confidence interval = 0.9-6.2), a high MF risk was associated with exposures to solar radiation.

CONCLUSION

It would appear that workers exposed to sunlight have a higher risk of MF. However, this factor is not the only one involved.

Protection of skin biological targets by different types of sunscreens

In vitro and in vivo studies provide a body of evidence that adequate protection of the skin against ultraviolet (UV)-induced damage requires photostable broad-spectrum sunscreens with a proper level of UVA protection. UVA alone and UV solar simulated radiation (SSR) induce DNA lesions in keratinocytes and melanocytes as reflected by the comet assay and p53 accumulation. UVA and SSR impair the immune system as shown by significant alteration of Langerhans cells and inhibition of contact hypersensitivity response to chemical allergens and delayed-type hypersensitivity response to recall antigens. Any of these detrimental effects is more efficiently prevented by sunscreens with a higher level of protection in the UVA range. The involvement of UVA (fibroblast alteration, increased metalloproteinase expression) and the pivotal need for well-balanced UVA/UVB sunscreens were further demonstrated using reconstructed three-dimensional skin models.

Tanning and skin cancer

Skin cancer is a large and growing problem in the United States. Sun and other ultraviolet (UV) light exposures play a key role in the development of skin cancer. Pediatricians can play an important role in counseling patients and are in a position to help educate children and their families about skin cancer. The purpose of this review is to familiarize pediatricians with the magnitude of the skin cancer problem and the evidence that ultraviolet light exposure, particularly indoor tanning, contributes to this problem. We reviewed the literature on ultraviolet light and skin cancer (based on a MEDLINE search of articles using the headings "ultraviolet light" and "skin cancer") and found that skin cancer is the most rapidly growing cause of cancer deaths in the United State. There is strong epidemiologic evidence for the relationship between UV exposure and nonmelanoma skin cancer and growing evidence for the relationship between indoor tanning and melanoma. We recommend that pediatricians counsel children and their parents about UV protection. Measures such as use of sunscreen and hats for outdoor play, both at home and in school, should be encouraged.

UVA Radiation Impairs Phenotypic and Functional Maturation of Human Dermal Dendritic Cells

There is now strong evidence that the ultraviolet A (UVA) part of the solar spectrum contributes to the development of skin cancers. Its effect on the skin immune system, however, has not been fully investigated. Here, we analyzed the effects of UVA radiation on dermal dendritic cells (DDC), which, in addition, provided further characterization of these cells. Dermal sheets were obtained from normal human skin and irradiated, or not, with UVA at 2 or 12 J per cm2. After a 2 d incubation, the phenotype of emigrant cells was analyzed by double immunostaining and flow cytometry. Results showed that migratory DDC were best characterized by CD1c expression and that only few cells co-expressed the Langerhans cell marker Langerin. Whereas the DC extracted from the dermis displayed an immature phenotype, emigrant DDC showed increased expression of HLA-DR and acquired co-stimulation and maturation markers. We showed here that UVA significantly decreased the number of viable emigrant DDC, a process related to increased apoptosis. Furthermore, UVA irradiation impaired the phenotypic and functional maturation of migrating DDC into potent antigen-presenting cells, in a concentration-dependent manner. The results provide further evidence that UVA are immunosuppressive and suggest an additional mechanism by which solar radiation impairs immune response.

Immune Protection Factors of Chemical Sunscreens Measured in the Local Contact Hypersensitivity Model in Humans

We conducted a randomized trial designed to calculate human in vivo immune protection factors of two sunscreen preparations in a model of ultraviolet-induced local suppression of the induction of contact hypersensitivity to 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene. Seventy-five male subjects were exposed in a multistage study to multiples of their individual minimal erythema dose of solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation with or without protection by an ultraviolet B sunscreen (sun protection factor 5.2) or a broad-spectrum ultraviolet A + B sunscreen (sun protection factor 6.2). After 24 h subjects were sensitized with 50 microL of 0.0625% 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene on a nonirradiated or ultraviolet-irradiated field on the buttock that was unprotected or protected by sunscreen. Three weeks after sensitization the subjects were challenged with varying concentrations of 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene on their upper inner arm, and the contact hypersensitivity response was determined at 48 and 72 h based on a semiquantitative clinical score, contact hypersensitivity lesion diameters, and dermal skin edema measurement by 20 MHz ultrasound. The 50% immunosuppressive dose ranged from 0.63 to 0.79 minimal erythema dose, depending on the endpoint parameter. Both sunscreens offered significant immunoprotection (p = 0.014-0.002) and their immune protection factor ranged from 4.5 to 5.8 (ultraviolet B sunscreen) and from 7.7 to 11 (ultraviolet A + B sunscreen). The immune protection factor of the ultraviolet B sunscreen was similar to the sun protection factor (5.2), whereas the sunscreen with broad-spectrum ultraviolet A + B protection exhibited better immunoprotective capacity than predicted from the sun protection factor.

High Ultraviolet A Protection Affords Greater Immune Protection Confirming that Ultraviolet A Contributes to Photoimmunosuppression in Humans

Solar radiation causes immunosuppression that contributes to skin cancer growth. Photoprotective strategies initially focused on the more erythemogenic ultraviolet B. More recently, the relationship of ultraviolet A and skin cancer has received increased attention. We hypothesized that if ultraviolet A contributes significantly to human ultraviolet-induced immune suppression, then increased ultraviolet A filtration by a sunscreen would better protect the immune system during ultraviolet exposure. Two hundred and eleven volunteers were randomized into study groups and received solar-simulated radiation, ranging from 0 to 2 minimum erythema dose, on gluteal skin, with or without sunscreen, 48 h prior to sensitization with dinitrochlorobenzene. Contact hypersensitivity response was evaluated by measuring the increase in skin fold thickness of five graded dinitrochlorobenzene challenge sites on the arm, 2 wk after sensitization. Clinical scoring using the North American Contact Dermatitis Group method was also performed. Solar-simulated radiation dose-response curves were generated and immune protection factor was calculated using a nonlinear regression model. Significance of immune protection between study groups was determined with the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon exact test. The sunscreen with high ultraviolet A absorption (ultraviolet A protection factor of 10, based on the in vivo persistent pigment darkening method) and a labeled sun protection factor of 15 demonstrated better immune protection than the product that had a low ultraviolet A absorption (ultraviolet A protection factor of 2) and a labeled sun protection factor of 15. Nonlinear regression analysis based on skin fold thickness increase revealed that the high ultraviolet A protection factor sunscreen had an immune protection factor of 50, more than three times its sun protection factor, whereas the low ultraviolet A protection factor sunscreen had an immune protection factor of 15, which was equal to its labeled sun protection factor. This study demonstrates that ultraviolet A contributes greatly to human immune suppression and that a broad-spectrum sunscreen with high ultraviolet A filtering capacity results in immune protection that exceeds erythema protection. These results show that high ultraviolet A protection is required to protect against ultraviolet-induced damage to cutaneous immunity.

Non-invasive in vivo determination of UVA efficacy of sunscreens using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of sunscreen efficacy is most relevant when measured on the surface it is meant to protect, namely on human skin in vivo. Application of any material to the surface of the skin alters its optical properties. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) is a non-invasive technique to measure changes in the optical properties of the skin decoupled from its biological responses following sunscreen application.

METHODS

This study compared measurements of UVA efficacy of oxybenzone and avobenzone at different concentrations (0-5%) using DRS, human phototest and an in vitro technique. Twenty subjects were enrolled for each product measured by DRS and 10 different subjects were enrolled for each product measured by human phototest. Six areas 5 cm x 10 cm were outlined on each subject's back. DRS measurements were performed on four subsites within each area before and 20 min after sunscreen application. UVA efficacy for each concentration of product was calculated from the measured transmission spectrum of a given product convoluted with the spectrum of a Xenon light source adequately filtered to obtain the UVA spectrum from 320 to 400 nm and the erythema action spectrum. Phototesting was performed using the same light source and persistent pigment darkening as the biological endpoint. Measurements were made with sunscreen coverage of 2 mg/cm2. In vitro measurements were performed using an Optometrics instrument.

RESULTS

All three techniques showed a linear response between calculated UVA efficacy and product concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that DRS is a rapid and reproducible method to calculate UVA efficacy of sunscreen materials and that its results correlate closely with those obtained by human phototesting.

Protection against UV-induced suppression of contact hypersensitivity responses by sunscreens in humans

Both in vivo skin immune responses and the skin's reaction to sun exposure integrate a complex interplay of biologic responses. The complexity and multiplicity of events that occur in the skin during an immune response make it a sensitive indication of both UVB and UVA-induced changes in the skin by sun damage, as well as those changes that are prevented by various sunscreens. Sunscreens are the most effective and widely available intervention for sun damage, other than sun avoidance or clothing. However, sunscreens vary widely in their relative ability to screen various UV waveband components, and their testing has been variably applied to outcomes other than for erythema to determine the sunburn protection factor (SPF), a measure primarily of UVB filtration only. Determination of an immune protection factor (IPF) has been proposed as an alternative or adjunctive measure to SPF, and recent studies show IPF can indeed detect added in vivo functionality of sunscreens, such as high levels of UVA protection, that SPF cannot. Clarification of the definition of IPF, however, is required. Excellent data are available on quantification of the IPF for restoring the afferent or induction arm of contact sensitivity, but other immune parameters have also been measured. Proposed here is nomenclature for whether the IPF is measured using contact sensitivity induction (IPF-CS-I), contact sensitivity elicitation (IPF-CS-E), delayed-type hypersensitivity elicitation (IPF-DTH-E), antigen-presenting cell function (IPF-APC-FXN) or numbers (IPF-APC-#), and cytokine modification such as IL-10 (i.e. IPF-cyto-IL-10). Similar nomenclatures could be used for other measures of skin function protection (i.e. DNA damage, p53 induction, oxidation products, etc.). A review of in vivo human studies, in which sunscreens are used to intervene in a UV-induced modulation of immune response, cells or cytokines, highlights the technical variables and statistical approaches which must also be standardized in the context of an IPF for regulatory or product claim purposes. Development of such IPF standards would allow the integration of both UVB and nonUVB (UVA, blue and possible IR) solar waveband effect-reversals, could be applied to integrate effects of other ingredients with protective function (i.e. antioxidants, retinoids, or other novel products), and would spur development of more advanced and complete protection products.

Effects of UVA radiation on an established immune response in humans and sunscreen efficacy

It is well established that ultraviolet radiation has immunomodulatory effects which may be involved in skin cancer. Recent studies have shown that UVA radiation (320-400 nm) as well as UVB (290-320 nm) is immunosuppressive. This means that sunscreens which mainly absorb UVB (protection against erythema) may be less effective in preventing UVR-induced immunosuppression than broad-spectrum products. We have studied the effects of UVA exposure on the human delayed-type hypersensitivity response (DTH) and compared the efficacy of sunscreens having different levels of UVA protection under both solar-simulated radiation (SSR) chronic exposures or acute exposure and outdoor real-life solar exposure conditions. DTH was assessed using recall antigens. Our studies clearly demonstrate the role of UVA in the induction of photoimmunosuppression together with the need for sunscreen products providing efficient photoprotection throughout the entire UV spectrum. These data suggest that sun protection factor may not be sufficient to predict the ability of sunscreens for protection from UV-induced immune suppression. Determining the level of UVA protection is particularly necessary, because UVA seems to have a relatively low contribution to erythema but is highly involved in immunosuppression.

Alterations in human epidermal Langerhans cells by ultraviolet radiation: quantitative and morphological study

BACKGROUND

Ultraviolet (UV) exposure of human skin induces local and systemic immune suppression. This phenomenon has been well documented when UVB radiation (290-320 nm) is used. The mechanism is thought to involve Langerhans cells (LCs), the epidermal dendritic cells that play a crucial role in antigen presentation. A variety of studies have clearly demonstrated that UVB radiation decreases LC density and alters their morphology and immunological function, but little is known about the effects of the entire UV spectrum (ultraviolet solar simulated radiation, UV-SSR or UVB + UVA) or UVA (320-400 nm) radiation alone.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to analyse and compare the effects of a single exposure of human volunteers to UV-SSR, total UVA or UVA1 (340-400 nm) in the human epidermal LC density and morphology.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry on epidermal sheets with various antibodies and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used.

RESULTS

Immunostaining for class II antigen revealed that a single UV-SSR exposure, corresponding to twice the minimal erythemal dose (MED), induced a significant reduction in LC density with only slight morphological alterations of remaining cells. After a single UVA exposure, LC density showed a dose-dependent reduction with a significant effect at 60 J cm(-2) (well above the MED). Moreover, the reduction of LC dendricity was also dose-dependent and significant for doses exceeding 30 J cm(-2). UVA1 radiation was as effective as total UVA for the later endpoint. As demonstrated by TEM, the location of Birbeck granules containing epidermal cells was modified in UVA-exposed areas. They were located in the spinous rather than in the suprabasal layer. In addition, the morphology of these cells was altered. We observed a rounding up of the cell body with a reduction of dendricity. Alterations of mitochondrial membrane and ridges were also seen.

CONCLUSIONS

A single exposure of human skin in vivo to UV-SSR, UVA or UVA1 radiation results in different alterations of density and/or morphology of LCs. All these alterations may impair the antigen-presenting function of LCs leading to an alteration of immune response.

A commercial sunscreen's protection against ultraviolet radiation-induced immunosuppression is more than 50% lower than protection against sunburn in humans

Ultraviolet radiation (280-400 nm)-induced suppression of cutaneous cell-mediated immunity plays an important part in the development of skin cancer. Sunscreens are widely advocated to protect against skin cancer but if they offer insufficient protection against immunosuppression they may inadvertently increase skin cancer risk. This human study evaluated immunoprotection afforded by a commercial sunscreen preparation (labeled sun protection factor 15) offering primarily ultraviolet B (280-320 nm) protection. Indirectly, it also investigated whether ultraviolet A (320-400 nm) plays a part in ultraviolet radiation-induced immunosuppression. Healthy white-skinned volunteers were used (n=119). Ultraviolet radiation exposures were on previously unexposed buttock skin with an ultraviolet radiation source that complied with European recommendations for sunscreen testing. Ultraviolet radiation dose-response curves for sunburn/erythema and suppression of the contact hypersensitivity response were generated either with or without sunscreen in vivo and protection factors were derived for both end-points. The ultraviolet radiation wavelengths transmitted by the sunscreen were determined in vitro and showed that the sunscreen was primarily an ultraviolet B absorber, with relatively poor absorption in the ultraviolet A region. The sun-screen protected against both erythema and immunosuppression but protection against immunosuppression (IPF=4.9, 95% confidence interval: 2.3-10.6) was less than half that for erythema (Ery-PFg=14.2, 95% confidence interval: 10.2-19.8). Failure of the sunscreen to afford comparable protection against both end-points was probably due to immunosuppression by ultraviolet A, a part of the solar spectrum that does not readily cause sunburn. The sunscreen protected against both end-points, which supports the use of sunscreens to reduce immunosuppression but protection against immunosuppression may be improved if sunscreens are formulated to offer equivalent protection against ultraviolet B and ultraviolet A.

Ultraviolet a augments solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation-induced local suppression of recall responses in humans

Many studies support the role of ultraviolet B in sunlight-induced alteration of the cutaneous immune system. The role of ultraviolet A is less clear, particularly in humans. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of additional ultraviolet A on solar-simulated ultraviolet-induced suppression of recall responses to nickel in humans. Immuno suppression dose-responses were induced in volunteers by exposure to solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation for four consecutive days. The ultraviolet A radiation dose was increased daily by providing additional high-dose ultraviolet A either before, or after the solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation. These ultraviolet A doses can be readily achieved through a sunscreen. Two different ultraviolet A spectra were used; 320-400 nm and 330-400 nm. Ultraviolet A alone did not cause significant immunosuppression, but augmented solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation-induced immunosuppression. Additional ultraviolet A reduced the minimum dose of solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation that was immunosuppressive. Both ultraviolet A spectra had this effect, although photoaugmentation was less pronounced with the 330-400 nm spectrum. Ultraviolet A-induced immediate pigment darkening did not protect from solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation-induced immuno suppression.

Broad-spectrum sunscreens provide better protection from the suppression of the elicitation phase of delayed-type hypersensitivity response in humans

It is well established that ultraviolet radiation has immunomodulatory effects that may be involved in skin cancer. Recent studies have shown that ultraviolet A radiation (320-400 nm) as well as ultraviolet B (290-320 nm) is immunosuppressive. This means sunscreens that mainly absorb ultraviolet B (protection against erythema) may be less effective in preventing ultraviolet radiation-induced immunosuppression than broad-spectrum products. We have studied the effects of ultraviolet A exposure on the human delayed-type hypersensitivity response and compared the efficacy of sunscreens having different levels of ultraviolet A protection under both solar-simulated radiation and outdoor real-life solar exposure conditions. Delayed-type hypersensitivity was assessed using recall antigens. In a first study, two groups of volunteers were exposed to ultraviolet A (either full spectrum ultraviolet A or ultraviolet A1) without prior application of sunscreen and they were shown to exhibit significantly reduced delayed-type hypersensitivity responses. In order to compare the efficacy of sunscreens in preventing photoimmunosuppression, three groups of subjects received 10 cumulative exposures to solar-simulated radiation; one group was exposed unprotected and the other two were exposed after being applied either a ultraviolet B or a broad-spectrum sunscreen, each with the same sun protection factor 9, but with different ultraviolet A protection factors 9 and 2. Then, an outdoor study was conducted in which delayed-type hypersensitivity was assessed before and after six daily exposures. Two different groups of subjects were treated with one of two sunscreens having the same sun protection factor 25 but different ultraviolet A-protection factors. In unprotected volunteers, responses to delayed-type hypersensitivity tests were significantly reduced irrespective of ultraviolet exposure conditions (full spectrum ultraviolet A, ultraviolet A1, solar-simulated radiation). The ultraviolet B sunscreen failed to protect from solar- simulated radiation-induced immunosuppression. In contrast, the broad-spectrum sunscreen having the same sun protection factor but providing high protection in the ultraviolet A range significantly reduced local ultraviolet-induced immunosuppression and prevented the distal effects. In the outdoor study, as compared with delayed-type hypersensitivity responses obtained before sun exposure, no alteration of immune response was detected when the skin was protected by broad-spectrum sunscreen sun protection factor 25 and ultraviolet A-protection factor 14. Conversely, a broad-spectrum sunscreen sun protection factor 25 ultraviolet A-protection factor 6 failed to protect against the sun-impaired response. The above studies clearly demonstrate the role of ultraviolet A in the induction of photoimmunosuppression together with the need for sunscreen products providing efficient photoprotection throughout the entire ultraviolet spectrum.

Ultraviolet a radiation suppresses an established immune response: implications for sunscreen design

The ultraviolet radiation present in sunlight is the primary cause of nonmelanoma skin cancer and has been implicated in the development of cutaneous malignant melanoma. In addition, ultraviolet is immune suppressive and the suppression induced by ultraviolet radiation has been identified as a risk factor for skin cancer induction. Ultraviolet also suppresses the immune response to infectious agents. In most experimental models, ultraviolet is applied to immunologically naive animals prior to immunization. Of equal concern, however, is the ability of sunlight to suppress established immune reactions, such as the recall reaction in humans, which protects against microbial infections. Here we demonstrate that solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation, applied after immunization, suppresses immunologic memory and the elicitation of delayed-type hypersensitivity. Further, we found that wavelengths in the ultraviolet A region of the solar spectrum were critical for inducing immune suppression. Ultraviolet A (320-400 nm) radiation was as effective as solar-simulated ultraviolet A + B (290-400 nm) in suppressing the elicitation of an established immune response. Irradiation with ultraviolet AI (340-400 nm) had no effect. Supporting a critical role for ultraviolet A in ultraviolet-induced immune suppression was the observation that applying a sunscreen that contained an ultraviolet B only filter had no protective effect, whereas, a sunscreen containing both ultraviolet A and ultraviolet B filters totally blocked ultraviolet-induced immune suppression. These data suggest that sunlight may depress the protective effect of prior vaccination. In addition, the observation that ultraviolet A is immunosuppressive indicates the need for ultraviolet A protection when designing sun protection strategies.

Photostabilization of butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane (Avobenzone) and ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate by bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine (Tinosorb S), a new UV broadband filter

It is now well documented that chronic UVA exposure induces damage to human skin. Therefore, modern sunscreens should not only provide protection from both UVB and UVA radiation but also maintain this protection during the entire period of exposure to the sun. UVA filters, however, are rare and not sufficiently photostable. We investigated the effect of the introduction of a new UV filter, bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine (Tinosorb S), in oil in water sunscreen formulations on the photostability of butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane (Avobenzone [AVB]) after irradiation with an optically filtered Xenon arc source (UV irradiance adjusted at 1 mean effective dose [MED]/min). With spectrophotometrical methods to assess the sun protection factor (SPF) and UVA ratio and chromatographical methods to determine the amount of UV filters recovered after irradiation we showed that Tinosorb S prevented the photodegradation of AVB in a concentration-dependent way, leading to a sustained SPF and UVA ratio even after irradiation with doses of up to 30 MED. Since AVB was shown to destabilize ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (EHM) we tested the effect of Tinosorb S in sunscreens containing this UV filter combination. Here too Tinosorb S showed photoprotective properties toward both UV filters. Thus, Tinosorb S can be used successfully to improve the photostability and efficiency of sunscreens containing AVB and EHM.

Effects of low-dose ultraviolet radiation on in vivo human cutaneous recall responses

Relatively few studies have examined the effects of low-dose ultraviolet (UV) radiation on in vivo human cutaneous immunity, or the ability of sunscreens to prevent UV-induced immunosuppression. We have studied the effects of solar-simulated UV radiation on nickel contact hypersensitivity (CHS) in nickel-allergic volunteers, and on delayed type hypersensitivity responses in Mantoux-positive volunteers. Nickel CHS and Mantoux responses were significantly suppressed by acute, suberythemal UV exposures equivalent to less than 8 min summer sunlight. Both UVA and UVB wavebands were immunosuppressive, but UVA-induced immunosuppression was transient, whereas UVB had a more sustained effect. Dose-responses for UV immunosuppression were determined using the nickel method, enabling calculation of in vivo sunscreen immune protection factors in a manner analogous with sun protection factor measurement. Sunscreens were found to confer significantly less protection against UV-induced immunosuppression than against UV-induced erythema.

Contrasting effects of an ultraviolet B and an ultraviolet A tanning lamp on interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor-alpha and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have demonstrated that a tanning lamp emitting predominantly ultraviolet (UV) A induces significant yields of the type of potentially mutagenic DNA damage that are associated with the onset of skin cancer (i.e. cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers). UV-induced immunosuppression is also an important event leading to skin cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To the modulation of key immunological molecules following exposure to a broad-spectrum UVB lamp and a predominantly UVA-emitting tanning lamp using model in vitro systems.

METHODS

We compared secretion and mRNA expression of interleukin (IL)-6 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha in normal human epidermal keratinocytes, and interferon (IFN)-gamma-induced intracellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 in normal human fibroblasts irradiated in vitro with a broad-spectrum UVB lamp or with a Philips 'Performance' tanning lamp.

RESULTS

With broad-spectrum UVB irradiation, upregulation of IL-6 and TNF-alpha mRNA was detected 6 h after irradiation, and a dose-dependent increase of cytokines in the supernatants of irradiated cells was found 24 h after irradiation. In contrast, there was no cytokine secretion and little evidence for mRNA upregulation following exposure to a tanning lamp. When cells were exposed first to broad-spectrum UVB, then the tanning lamp, UVB-induced cytokine secretion was inhibited, although mRNA levels were upregulated to a level close to that observed with UVB alone. By using a Schott WG 320 nm filter to attenuate the level of UVB relative to UVA emitted by the tanning lamp, the inhibition of cytokine secretion was shown to be associated with UVA exposure. Both UV sources inhibited IFN-gamma-induced ICAM-1 mRNA expression in a dose-dependent fashion. By using a Schott WG 335 nm filter, inhibition of ICAM-1 mRNA expression by the tanning lamp was shown to be associated with UVB exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that UV sources emitting different levels of UVA and UVB have differential effects on the modulation of different immunoregulatory molecules, and indicate that there are potential interactions between these wavelengths.

Dose response for UV-induced immune suppression in people of color: differences based on erythemal reactivity rather than skin pigmentation

Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is known to suppress immune responses in human subjects. The purpose of this study was to develop dose responses across a broad range of skin pigmentation in order to facilitate risk assessment. UVR was administered using FS 20 bulbs. Skin pigmentation and UVR sensitivity were evaluated using Fitzpatrick classifications, minimal erythemal dose (MED), slope of the erythemal dose response curve (sED), baseline pigmentation and tanning response. To assess immune responses dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) was applied to irradiated buttock skin 72 h after irradiation. Two weeks later DNCB was applied to the inside upper arm. Skin thickness was measured before and after challenge. Dose response was modeled (to obtain a regression line) for the entire group of 185 subjects. With the exception of sED none of the above-mentioned pigmentation indicators contributed significantly to variability around the regression line. Thus, differences in sensitivity for multiple skin types based on Fitzpatrick classification or MED were not observed. However, differences in immune sensitivity to UVR were detected between subjects with steep erythemal dose response curves and those with moderate or flat responses. For subjects with steep erythemal responses the dose calculated to suppress the immune response by 50% was 114 mJ/cm2. This group included individuals with Fitzpatrick skin types I-V, MED for these subjects ranged from 30 to 80 mJ/cm2. The 50% suppression dose for subjects with weak or no erythemal response could not be computed (the dose response was flat). This resistant group included subjects with skin types IV-VI and MED for these subjects ranged from 41 to > 105 mJ/cm2. This study provides a human dose response for UVR suppression of contact sensitivity that will be useful in risk assessment. It is the first study to provide this information using the FS sun lamp and is the first study to include people of color. The sED appears to be a new variable for identifying sensitive subjects at risk of UVR-induced immune suppression.

Ultraviolet AI exposure of human skin results in Langerhans cell depletion and reduction of epidermal antigen-presenting cell function: partial protection by a broad-spectrum sunscreen

BACKGROUND

Ultraviolet (UV) B-induced effects on the skin immune system have been extensively investigated, but little is known regarding the immunological changes induced by UVA exposure of human skin. Recent data assessing the protection afforded by sunscreens against photoimmunosuppression stress the need for broad-spectrum sunscreens with an adequate UVA protection.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was first to determine the changes observed in epidermal Langerhans cells (ELC) density and epidermal antigen-presenting cell (APC) activity after exposure of human skin to UVAI (340-400 nm) radiation, and secondly to assess the immune protection afforded in vivo by a sunscreen formulation containing a long wavelength UVA filter with a low UVA protection factor (UVA-PF = 3).

METHODS

Epidermal cell (EC) suspensions were prepared from skin biopsies 3 days after exposure to a single dose of UVAI (either 30 or 60 J cm(-2)).

RESULTS

Flow-cytometric analysis of EC suspensions revealed that exposure to 60 J cm(-2) UVAI resulted in a decreased number of ELC without infiltration of CD36+ DR+ CD1a- antigen-presenting macrophages into the epidermis, and a significant reduction of HLA-DR expression on viable ELC. In vivo exposure to both 30 and 60 J cm(-2) resulted in a decreased allogeneic CD4+ T-cell proliferation induced by UVAI-irradiated ECs. The sunscreen application partially prevented (57 +/- 9%) the decrease in epidermal allogeneic APC activity induced by 60 J cm(-2) UVAI.

CONCLUSIONS

In vivo UVAI exposure of human skin results in a decreased number of ELC and in a downregulation of epidermal APC activity. This last effect is partially prevented by prior application of a sunscreen with a low UVAI-PF value. These results indicate that increasing the absorption of UV filters for long UVA wavelengths may lead to an improved immune protection.

Ultraviolet A and melanoma: a review

The incidence and mortality rates of melanoma have risen for many decades in the United States. Increased exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation is generally considered to be responsible. Sunburns, a measure of excess sun exposure, have been identified as a risk factor for the development of melanoma. Because sunburns are primarily due to UVB (280-320 nm) radiation, UVB has been implicated as a potential contributing factor to the pathogenesis of melanoma. The adverse role of UVA (320-400 nm) in this regard is less well studied, and currently there is a great deal of controversy regarding the relationship between UVA exposure and the development of melanoma. This article reviews evidence in the English-language literature that surrounds the controversy concerning a possible role for UVA in the origin of melanoma. Our search found that UVA causes DNA damage via photosensitized reactions that result in the production of oxygen radical species. UVA can induce mutations in various cultured cell lines. Furthermore, in two animal models, the hybrid Xiphophorus fish and the opossum (Mondelphis domestica), melanomas and melanoma precursors can be induced with UVA. UVA radiation has been reported to produce immunosuppression in laboratory animals and in humans. Some epidemiologic studies have reported an increase in melanomas in users of sunbeds and sunscreens and in patients exposed to psoralen and UVA (PUVA) therapy. There is basic scientific evidence of the harmful effects of UVA on DNA, cells and animals. Collectively, these data suggest a potential role for UVA in the pathogenesis of melanoma. To date evidence from epidemiologic studies and clinical observations are inconclusive but seem to be consistent with this hypothesis. Additional research on the possible role of UVA in the pathogenesis of melanoma is required.

Long-wave UVA offers partial protection against UVB-induced immune suppression in human skin

Ultraviolet-B (UVB, 280-320 nm) interferes with the generation of cell-mediated immunity to contact allergens applied epicutaneously on the irradiated site. To investigate whether pretreatment with UVA-1 (340-400 nm) protects against the UVB-induced immune suppression we sensitized human volunteers with diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) on normal buttock skin (n= 12), on UVB-irradiated buttock skin (n=21), on buttock skin pretreated with UVA-1 (n= 12), and on buttock skin pretreated with UVA-1 and thereafter irradiated with UVB (n=22). Sensitization on UVB-irradiated skin reduced the immunization rate to DPCP compared with sensitization on non-irradiated skin (p<0.01) and skin pretreated with UVA-1 (p<0.01). In contrast, the immunization rate in the group of volunteers sensitized on skin pretreated with UVA-1 before UVB irradiation was significantly higher than the immunization rate in the group of volunteers sensitized on UVB-irradiated skin alone (p<0.05). These results indicate that pretreatment with UVA-1 under certain conditions offers partial protection against the UVB-induced reduction in the immunization rates to epicutaneous allergens.

Exposure to UVB induces accumulation of LFA-1+ T cells and enhanced expression of the chemokine psoriasin in normal human skin

Normal human skin shows preferential (epi)dermal infiltration of CD4+ T cells upon acute UV exposure. To study the mechanism behind this feature we locally exposed healthy volunteers to doses of UV commonly encountered by the population. Expression of integrins on T cells and expression of adhesion molecules on dermal endothelial cells were quantitatively assessed by immunohistochemistry in situ. We also investigated the effects of ultraviolet-B (UVB) exposure on psoriasin and IL-16, two specific chemoattractant factors for CD4+ T cells, at messenger RNA (mRNA) level by semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and at protein level by immunohistochemistry. We found, at day 2 after exposure to four minimal erythema doses of UVB, predominant accumulation of LFA-1+/CLA-/VLA-4- T cells in the dermis. Concomitantly the expression of ICAM-1, but not that of E-selectin and VCAM-1, was upregulated on dermal endothelial cells. The increase in the number of dermal T cells was not due to proliferation because only 2% of the UVB-induced dermal T cells expressed the marker of proliferation Ki-67. Whereas exposure to 35 J/cm2 of ultraviolet-A (UVA), like UVB, induced a loss of intraepidermal T cells at day 2 after exposure, UVA induced neither any influx of T cells into the dermis nor any adhesion molecule upregulation on endothelial cells. In response to UVB exposure, the expression of psoriasin mRNA, but not of IL-16 mRNA, was upregulated; the expression of psoriasin protein was also found to be upregulated. These results suggest that LFA-1/ICAM-1 pathway and psoriasin are both involved in the accumulation of CD4+ T cells into UVB-irradiated skin, possibly via a recruitment mechanism.

Improved protection against solar-simulated radiation-induced immunosuppression by a sunscreen with enhanced ultraviolet A protection

Ultraviolet radiation-induced immunosuppression is thought to play a part in skin cancer. Several studies have indicated that sunscreens that are designed to protect against erythema failed to give comparable protection against ultraviolet radiation-induced immunosuppression. One possible reason for this discrepancy is inadequate ultraviolet A protection. This study evaluated the level of immunoprotection in mice afforded by two broad-spectrum sunscreens with the same sun protection factor, but with different ultraviolet A protection factors. Both sunscreens contained the same ultraviolet B and ultraviolet A filters, in the same vehicle, but at different concentrations. Solar simulated radiation dose-response curves for erythema, edema, and systemic suppression of contact hypersensitivity were generated and used to derive protection factors for each end-point. The results of three different techniques for determining immune protection factor were compared. A comparison of the two sunscreens showed that the protection factor for erythema in mice was similar to that determined in humans (sun protection factor) but the protection factor for edema in mice was lower. Both sunscreens protected against suppression of contact hypersensitivity but the product with the higher ultraviolet A-protection factor showed significantly greater protection. The three techniques for determining immunoprotection gave very similar results for a given sunscreen, but immune protection factor was always lower than sun protection factor. These data suggest that sun protection factor may not predict the ability of sunscreens to protect the immune system and that a measure of ultraviolet A protection may also be necessary.

Evaluation of the protective effect of sunscreens on in vitro reconstructed human skin exposed to UVB or UVA irradiation

We have previously shown that skin reconstructed in vitro is a useful model to study the effects of UVB and UVA exposure. Wavelength-specific biological damage has been identified such as the formation of sunburn cells (SBC) and pyrimidine dimers after UVB irradiation and alterations of dermal fibroblasts after UVA exposure. These specific effects were selected to evaluate the protection afforded by two sunscreens after topical application on the skin surface. Simplified formulations having different absorption spectra but similar sun protection factors were used. One contained a classical UVB absorber, 2-ethylhexyl-p-methoxycinnamate. The other contained a broad-spectrum absorber called Mexoryl SX, characterized by its strong absorbing potency in the UVA range. Both filters were used at 5% in a simple water/oil vehicle. The evaluation of photoprotection on in vitro reconstructed skin revealed good efficiency for both preparations in preventing UVB-induced damage, as shown by SBC counting and pyrimidine dimer immunostaining. By contrast, only the Mexoryl SX-containing preparation was able to efficiently prevent UVA-specific damage such as dermal fibroblast disappearance. Our data further support the fact that skin reconstructed in vitro is a reliable system to evaluate the photoprotection provided by different sunscreens against specific UVB and UVA biological damage.

Nonlymphoid intraepidermal mononuclear cell collections (pseudo-Pautrier abscesses): a morphologic and immunophenotypical characterization

We evaluated the incidence, morphology, and immunophenotype of intraepidermal collections of mononuclear cells (ICMC) in a large number of inflammatory dermatosis and cutaneous lymphomas. ICMC appeared as small to large aggregates of cells, showing a morphology variable from monocytes to obvious dendritic cells, admixed with rare lymphocytes. ICMC were recognized in the epidermis or within hair follicle epithelium, and were either loosely or compactly arranged. ICMC were identified in 124 of 1,248 skin biopsies (9.9%) of inflammatory or lymphoid infiltrates, and were particularly frequent in spongiotic (43.4%) and in lichenoid dermatitis (10%), whereas they were rarely found in nonspecific superficial dermatitis (3.8%) and in psoriasis (4.7%). ICMC were also frequent in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (13.3%), where they mimicked Pautrier abscesses. The ICMC forming cells showed a unique phenotype: the majority of them expressed CD1a and S-100, and lacked CD14, similar to mature Langerhans cells, but they were also strongly labeled by anti-CD11b, anti-CD36, and anti-CD68. Moreover, a subpopulation of them expressed CD83, an antigen that is usually absent on Langerhans cells. The occurrence of ICMC is a rather frequent, although hitherto poorly studied, phenomenon, occurring in several dermatosis, but particularly frequent in spongiosis-associated skin reactions. The cells within ICMC are represented by dendritic cells and dendritic cell precursors, whose phenotype indicates their derivation from circulating monocytes and differentiation into mature Langerhans cells.

Heme oxygenase induction mediates the photoimmunoprotective activity of UVA radiation in the mouse

In contrast to the immunosuppressive potential of UVB (280-320 nm) radiation in experimental animals and humans, UVA (320-400 nm) radiation at environmentally relevant doses appears to be immunologically inert. However, such exposure to UVA radiation has been observed unexpectedly to induce resistance to UVB-induced immunosuppression in mice, by a mechanism resulting in the inactivation of cis-urocanic acid (UCA), an epidermal immunosuppressive UV photoproduct. In this study in mice, we show that the immunoprotective activity of UVA radiation, against the effects of both UVB radiation and cis-UCA, can be attributed to the induction of cutaneous heme oxygenase (HO; EC 1.14.99.3). Cell-mediated immune function was assessed in vivo by the contact hypersensitivity response induced to oxazolone at an unirradiated skin site, and HO enzyme activity was measured in cutaneous microsomal preparations from treated mice. There was a progressive increase in HO enzyme activity for at least 3 days after UVA irradiation. However HO activity, both constitutive and UVA radiation-induced, was sensitive to the effects of injecting mice with the specific HO inhibitor, tin protoporphyrin (Sn [IV] protoporphyrin IX; SnPP). We observed, in addition, that in SnPP-injected mice, the immunoprotective effect of UVA radiation against either UVB radiation or cis-UCA was abrogated. Because SnPP injection did not affect normal contact hypersensitivity responsiveness but did inhibit the constitutive HO enzyme activity, it appeared that only the inducible HO was active in modulating immune function. This finding indicates that UVA-induced HO activity is a major player in the skin defenses against UVB immunosuppression.

Wavelength-specific synergy between ultraviolet radiation and interleukin-1 alpha in the regulation of matrix-related genes: mechanistic role for tumor necrosis factor-alpha

Ultraviolet light causes both acute and chronic changes in extracellular matrix. We sought to examine the effects of different ultraviolet wavelengths on expression of matrix-related genes in fibroblasts. We previously reported that tropoelastin gene expression in vivo decreases with acute ultraviolet B exposure, and interleukin-1 alpha-mediated upregulation of tropoelastin is blocked in vitro after ultraviolet B radiation. In this study, we found that only ultraviolet B, but not ultraviolet A or ultraviolet A1, blocked the ability of interleukin-1 alpha to stimulate tropoelastin expression in vitro. Ultraviolet B and interleukin-1 alpha synergistically increased tumor necrosis factor-alpha secretion by fibroblasts, a finding not seen with ultraviolet B alone nor with ultraviolet A or ultraviolet A1 combined with interleukin-1 alpha. Keratinocytes showed a similar ultraviolet B-specific induction of tumor necrosis factor-alpha production. Addition of tumor necrosis factor-alpha to cultured fibroblasts blocked interleukin-1 alpha-induced stimulation of tropoelastin message, and addition of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibodies restored the responsiveness of tropoelastin and collagen messages to exogenous interleukin-1 alpha after ultraviolet B exposure. We conclude that interleukin-1 alpha in combination specifically with ultraviolet B induces fibroblasts to secrete tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and that this ultraviolet B-specific induction of tumor necrosis factor-alpha secretion is responsible for effects of ultraviolet B on the expression of matrix-related genes in the skin.

Low-dose UVA and UVB have different time courses for suppression of contact hypersensitivity to a recall antigen in humans

This study investigates the relative effects of low-dose solar-simulated ultraviolet, ultraviolet A, and ultraviolet B radiation on the elicitation of contact hypersensitivity to nickel in nickel-allergic volunteers. A xenon arc lamp with changeable filters was used to irradiate groups of volunteers daily, on separate areas of their lower backs, with both solar-simulated ultraviolet (ultraviolet B, ultraviolet AII + ultraviolet AI) and ultraviolet A (same ultraviolet AII content but twice the ultraviolet AI as the solar-simulated ultraviolet spectrum) for 1 and 2 d; 3, 4, and 5 d; and from 1 to 4 wk. A fourth group was irradiated for 1-5 d with the ultraviolet B component of solar-simulated ultraviolet. Following the final irradiation in each group, nickel-containing patches were applied to both ultraviolet-treated sites and adjacent, unirradiated control sites. Erythema caused by nickel contact hypersensitivity at each site was quantitated 72 h later with a reflectance erythema meter. By comparing the nickel reactions of irradiated and unirradiated skin, ultraviolet immunosuppression was assessed with the different spectra and durations of ultraviolet exposure. We found significant immunosuppression with daily doses of ultraviolet B and ultraviolet A equivalent to approximately 6 min of summer sun exposure, and that ultraviolet A and ultraviolet B exerted their maximal immunosuppressive effects at different times. Solar-simulated ultraviolet-induced immunosuppression was significant after one exposure, near-maximal after two exposures and remained elevated thereafter. Ultraviolet B-induced immunosuppression was lower than that induced by solar-simulated ultraviolet, but followed a similar time-course. In contrast, ultraviolet A-induced immunosuppression was transient, peaking after three exposures. Immune responses returned towards normal with subsequent ultraviolet A exposure, suggesting that an adaptive mechanism may prevent immunosuppression by continued ultraviolet A irradiation.

In vivo UVA-1 and UVB irradiation differentially perturbs the antigen-presenting function of human epidermal Langerhans cells

Ultraviolet B (UVB, 290-320 nm) radiation is known to suppress the immune function of epidermal Langerhans cells. We have recently described that in vitro UVB irradiation perturbs the antigen-presenting cell function of Langerhans cells by inhibiting their expression of functional B7 costimulatory molecules (B7-1, B7-2). The aim of this study was to determine wavelength-specific UV effects on Langerhans cells function in vivo, specifically UVB and UVA-1. To address this issue, volunteers were irradiated on the sun protected volar aspects of their forearms with 3 x minimal erythema dose of UVB (Philips TL-12) and UVA-1 (UVASUN 5000 Mutzhaas). Langerhans cells were isolated from suction blister roofs immediately following irradiation. Langerhans cells isolated from UVB- but not from UVA-1-irradiated skin failed to activate naïve resting allogeneic T cells (mixed epidermal cell leukocyte reaction) or primed tetanus toxoid reactive autologous T cells. Langerhans cells isolated from sham-irradiated or UVA-1-irradiated skin strongly upregulated B7-2 molecules during short-term tissue culture. By contrast, Langerhans cells from UVB-irradiated skin did not upregulate B7-2 molecules. Furthermore, exogenous stimulation of the B7 pathway by anti-CD28 stimulatory monoclonal antibodies restored the capacity of UVB-irradiated Langerhans cells to activate both alloreactive and tetanus toxoid-reactive T cells, implying suppressed antigen-presenting cell activities and perturbed B7 expression of Langerhans cells isolated from UVB-irradiated skin are related. Those studies demonstrate that in vivo UVB, but not UVA-1, interferes with the activation-dependent upregulation of B7 molecules on Langerhans cells, which in turn is of functional relevance for the perturbed antigen-presenting cell function of Langerhans cells within UVB- but not UVA-1-irradiated skin.

High-performance liquid chromatographic method for the comparison of the photostability of five sunscreen agents

Sunscreen agents are commonly used in cosmetic products to filter out noxious radiation in sunlight. A convenient high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method for the quantification of five sunscreens after irradiation has been selected. We used this analytical method to compare the photostability of benzophenone-3, PEG-25 PABA, octyl dimethyl PABA, 4-methylbenzylidene camphor and butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane, at levels in the range of 25-60 microM. The assay was carried out, using a C8 column with a methanol--water mobile phase. The detector was set at a wavelength of 300 nm. The assay was linear with the following limits: 0.2 microgram ml-1 for benzophenone-3, 1 microgram ml-1 for PEG-25 PABA, 0.15 microgram ml-1 for octyl dimethyl PABA, 0.1 microgram ml-1 for methylbenzylidene camphor and 0.05 microgram ml-1 for butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane. The half-lives calculated indicate a very good photostability of the sunscreens studied and permit to classify amongst themselves.

Microfine zinc oxide (Z-cote) as a photostable UVA/UVB sunblock agent

BACKGROUND

Microfine zinc oxide (Z-Cote) is used as a transparent broad-spectrum sunblock to attenuate UV radiation (UVR), including UVA I (340-400 nm).

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to assess the suitability of microfine zinc oxide as a broad-spectrum photoprotective agent by examining those properties generally considered important in sunscreens: attenuation spectrum, sun protection factor (SPF) contribution, photostability, and photoreactivity.

METHODS

Attenuation spectrum was assessed by means of standard spectrophotometric methods. SPF contribution was evaluated according to Food and Drug Administration standards. Photostability was measured in vitro by assessing SPF before and after various doses of UVR. Photoreactivity was evaluated by subjecting a microfine zinc oxide/organic sunscreen formulation to escalating doses of UVR and determining the percentage of organic sunscreen remaining.

RESULTS

Microfine zinc oxide attenuates throughout the UVR spectrum, including UVA I. It is photostable and does not react with organic sunscreens under irradiation.

CONCLUSION

Microfine zinc oxide is an effective and safe sunblock that provides broad-spectrum UV protection, including protection from long-wavelength UVA.