ASH position paper: treatment of hypertension in patients with diabetes-an update

The Construction and Meaning of Race Within Hypertension Guidelines: A Systematic Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Professional society guidelines are evidence-based recommendations intended to promote standardized care and improve health outcomes. Amid increased recognition of the role racism plays in shaping inequitable healthcare delivery, many researchers and practitioners have critiqued existing guidelines, particularly those that include race-based recommendations. Critiques highlight how racism influences the evidence that guidelines are based on and its interpretation. However, few have used a systematic methodology to examine race-based recommendations. This review examines hypertension guidelines, a condition affecting nearly half of all adults in the United States (US), to understand how guidelines reference and develop recommendations related to race.

METHODS

A systematic scoping review of all professional guidelines on the management of essential hypertension published between 1977 and 2022 to examine the use and meaning of race categories.

RESULTS

Of the 37 guidelines that met the inclusion criteria, we identified a total of 990 mentions of race categories. Black and African/African American were the predominant race categories referred to in guidelines (n = 409). Guideline authors used race in five key domains: describing the prevalence or etiology of hypertension; characterizing prior hypertension studies; describing hypertension interventions; social risk and social determinants of health; the complexity of race. Guideline authors largely used race categories as biological rather than social constructions. None of the guidelines discussed racism and the role it plays in perpetuating hypertension inequities.

DISCUSSION

Hypertension guidelines largely refer to race as a distinct and natural category rather than confront the longstanding history of racism within and beyond the medical system. Normalizing race as a biological rather than social construct fails to address racism as a key determinant driving inequities in cardiovascular health. These changes are necessary to produce meaningful structural solutions that advance equity in hypertension education, research, and care delivery.

Dietary approach for the treatment of arterial hypertension in patients with diabetes mellitus

The association of hypertension and diabetes mellitus is extremely common, increasing the mortality risk of patients, mainly by cardiovascular causes. Regarding the blood pressure (BP) targets to be achieved, most guidelines suggest levels of 130 mmHg for SBP and of 80 mmHg for DBP. Dietary modifications are quite effective, and many studies suggest that decreasing sodium intake and increasing potassium ingestion are both valuable practices for reducing BP. This can be achieved by stimulating the ingestion of lacteous products, vegetables, and nuts. As for the ideal pharmacologic treatment for hypertension, either calcium channel blockers, diuretics or angiotensin-system blockers can be the first class of drug to be used. In this review, we summarize the evaluation of patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension, and discuss the available therapeutic approaches, with emphasis on evidence-based dietary recommendations.

The prevalence of pre-diabetes and diabetes and their associated factors in Northeast China: a cross-sectional study

This study investigates the prevalence of pre-diabetes and diabetes and their associated risk factors among adults in Northeast China. A multistage stratified cluster sampling method was used to select adults from Jilin Province. Out of an initial recruitment of 23,050 individuals, 21,435 participants completed an interview and medical examination. The estimated prevalence of diabetes and pre-diabetes were 9.1% and 19.8%, respectively. The prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity were the highest in participants with previously diagnosed diabetes. Participants who were previously diagnosed with diabetes were more likely to be aware of their hypertension and dyslipidemia status. Participants who were older, male, more educated, or who were widows or widowers were at greater risk for pre-diabetes. Similarly, those who were current drinkers or smokers, had higher BMI or waist circumference, had a family history of diabetes, or who reported they lived in urban areas or had low physical activity levels had increased pre-diabetes risk. The observed levels of diabetes and pre-diabetes in this study indicate that the medical authority needs to focus more attention in this area, and that health monitoring is essential to improving the health awareness of its residents.

The Use of a Stem and Leaf Aqueous Extract of Cissus quadrangularis (CQR-300) to Reduce Body Fat and Other Components of Metabolic Syndrome in Overweight Participants

BACKGROUND

Previous work had shown the ability of an aqueous leaf and stem extract of Cissus quandrangularis (300 mg of CQR, CQR-300) to improve components of metabolic syndrome (MS) in overweight individuals.

OBJECTIVE

This small pilot study aimed to confirm the efficacy of CQR-300 in reducing the percentage body fat measured using two different methods-bioelectrical impedance assay versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

DESIGN

The study was an 8-week double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial on 67 individuals who were requested by a dietary counselor to maintain their normal exercise and dietary routines. Participants were randomly divided into two groups, placebo (32 participants) and the CQR-300 group (35 participants), and received 300 mg of corn starch or CQR-300 daily.

METHODS

Body fat was measured by bioelectrical impedance using a TANITA impedance meter and by DEXA, with blood samples taken at baseline and at 8 weeks for the measurement of lipid parameters.

RESULTS

After 8 weeks of treatment, participants of the placebo group showed a 1.05% decrease in body fat as determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis, but no difference using DEXA. In the same time period, the CQR-300 group had an 8.9% and 12.8% decreases in the body fat as measured by impedance and DEXA, respectively. These values were significantly (p < 0.05) lower than the placebo. Compared with the placebo, the CQR-300 group demonstrated significant (p < 0.05) decreases in the waist and hip circumferences, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, total cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting blood glucose, as well as leptin levels. On the contrary, there were significant (p < 0.05) increases in HDL-cholesterol and adiponectin levels.

CONCLUSION

CQR-300 administered as a single 300 mg dose daily was effective in reducing body fat as well as improving blood parameters associated with MS.

Determinants of drug-related problems among ambulatory type 2 diabetes patients with hypertension comorbidity in Southwest Ethiopia: a prospective cross sectional study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess drug-related problems and its determinants in type 2 diabetes patients with hypertension co-morbidity.

RESULTS

A total of 300 type 2 diabetes patients with hypertension co-morbidity were studied. The majority of participants, 194 (64.7%), were males. Mean age of the participants was 54.44 ± 11.68 years. The mean durations of diabetes and hypertension were 5.37 ± 4.79 and 5.15 ± 4.65 years respectively. The most commonly prescribed antidiabetic medications were metformin in 200 (66.7%) and insulin 126 (42%) of the participants. Enalapril was the most commonly prescribed antihypertensive medication; 272 (90.7%). Aspirin was prescribed to 182 (60.7%) participants. Statins were prescribed to one-third (65.67%) of the participants. Eighty-five (28.3%) participants had diabetes related complications other than hypertension. A total of 494 drug related problems were identified. The mean number of drug related problems was 1.65 ± 1.05. The most common drug related problems were need for additional drug therapy (29.35%), ineffective drug (27.94%) and dose too low (15.8%). Independent predictors of drug related problems were age 41-60 years (AOR = 6.87, 95% CI 2.63-17.93), age > 60 years (AOR = 5.85, 95% CI 2.15-15.93) and the presence of comorbidity (AOR = 3.0, 95% CI 1.11-8.16).

Quality of life and duration of hemodialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD): a cross-sectional study

Abstract Introduction: Quality of life (QoL) of hemodialysis patients is a major evaluative marker currently measured, while treatment time is a clinical determinant associated with impaired QOL. Objective: To evaluate QOL in individuals undergoing hemodialysis (HD) considering treatment time and the presence of comorbidities. Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted in the hemodialysis unit of the Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (HC-UFPE). We studied patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) of both genders over the age of 18 years, at any level of education and undergoing HD for at least 6 months. We evaluated the demographic/socioeconomic and clinical data, followed by application of the quality of life questionnaire (KDQOL-SF). Results: Participants were 47 patients with a mean age of 50.94 ± 13.33 years, 55.3% were male and average treatment time of 57.35 ± 61.46 months. Hypertension (59.6%) was the most frequent underlying disease. According to the responses obtained through the KDQOL-SF, the situation at work and physical limitation scored worse. Sexual function (85.83) and encouragement by the team had the best performance. There were no differences in dimensions of questionnaire and treatment time. Conclusion: The presence of comorbidities and HD duration were not found to be possible factors for changing QoL in this study. However, we suggest that future studies evaluate other factors such as laboratory, emotional and functional data to check for changes in QoL in these patients related to HD duration.

Determinants of isolated systolic hypertension among diabetic patients visiting the diabetic clinic at the Tamale Teaching Hospital, Northern Ghana

BACKGROUND

Hypertension and diabetes mellitus, two of the leading risk factors for atherosclerosis, are associated with numerous complications, including heart attacks and strokes.

AIM

This study established the prevalence and determinants of isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) in diabetes mellitus patients visiting the Tamale Teaching Hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this purposive cross-sectional study, 107 diabetes mellitus patients were recruited from the out-patient diabetes clinic of the Tamale Teaching Hospital (TTH). Blood and urine samples were collected for the estimation of fasting blood glucose (FBG) and routine urinalysis respectively. A well-structured pre-tested questionnaire was used to obtain socio-demographic data and clinical history of participants, and their blood pressure measured with a mercury sphygmomanometer.

RESULTS

The prevalence of ISH among the participants was 37.4%. Mean age and FBG were significantly higher among participants with ISH than the normotensives (56.20 ± 10.60 v 48.44 ± 11.6, P= 0.022; and 8.80 ± 3.06 v 6.01 ± 0.50, P= 0.034 respectively). Type of diabetes mellitus was associated with ISH (P= 0.010) and age was a risk factor of ISH (OR= 1.057, P= 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Isolated systolic hypertension was prevalent in 37.4% of diabetes mellitus patients and was associated with older age. Effective measures should, therefore, be instituted to prevent ISH in patients with type 2 diabetes especially the elderly.

Hypertension awareness, treatment, and control among diabetic and nondiabetic individuals in a multiethnic population in the Netherlands: the HELIUS study

OBJECTIVES

There is a paucity of data on hypertension awareness, treatment and control among diabetic adults from different ethnic backgrounds. We assessed ethnic differences in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among diabetic adults and how they are compared with individuals without diabetes.

METHODS

Baseline data from the Healthy Life in an Urban Setting study were used including 12 ,633 adults aged 18-70 years from six ethnic backgrounds in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Age-sex-adjusted prevalence ratios were used to explore ethnic differences.

RESULTS

Among diabetic individuals, African-Surinamese (80.2%; 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.51) and Ghanaians (81.7%; 1.40, 1.17-1.68) were more likely than Dutch (69.6%) to have hypertension. There were no significant ethnic differences in the rates of awareness and treatment, but blood pressure (BP) control rates among treated hypertensives were significantly lower in Ghanaians (41.7%; 0.66, 0.45-0.96) and African-Surinamese (28.7%; 0.53, 0.34-0.84) than Dutch (54.1%). Among nondiabetic adults, except Moroccans, all the ethnic minorities had higher prevalence rates of hypertension, awareness (except South-Asian Surinamese and Turks) and treatment than Dutch people. By contrast, BP control rates among treated hypertensives were lower in all ethnic minorities, with the differences being significant for African-Surinamese (42.5%; 0.68, 0.57-0.80), South-Asian Surinamese (41.8%; 0.68, 0.57-0.82), and Ghanaians (35.2%; 0.54, 0.45-0.65).

CONCLUSION

Hypertension awareness and treatment rates are similar among ethnic groups in both diabetics and nondiabetics. Adequate BP control remains low among ethnic minorities, particularly among diabetic African origin people. Major effort is needed to improve BP control among diabetic people given the cardiovascular complications associated with uncontrolled BP in this group.

Classes of antihypertensive agents and mortality in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes-Network meta-analysis of randomized trials

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of antihypertensive drug classes in mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Clinical Trials and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized trials comparing thiazides, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), angiotensin-converting inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), alone or in combination for hypertension treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. Outcomes were overall and cardiovascular mortality. Network meta-analysis was used to obtain pooled effect estimate.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies, comprising 49,418 participants, 5647 total and 1306 cardiovascular deaths were included. No differences in total or cardiovascular mortality were observed with isolated antihypertensive drug classes compared to each other or placebo. The ACEi and CCB combination showed evidence of reduction in cardiovascular mortality comparing to placebo [median HR, 95% credibility intervals: 0.16, 0.01-0.82], betablockers (0.20, 0.02-0.98), CCBs (0.21, 0.02-0.97) and ARBs (0.18, 0.02-0.91). In included trials, this combination was the treatment that most consistently achieved both lower systolic and diastolic end of study blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no benefit of a single antihypertensive class in reduction of mortality in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. Reduction of cardiovascular mortality observed in patients treated with ACEi and CCB combination may be related to lower blood pressure levels.

Type of β-blocker use among patients with versus without diabetes after myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Discharge β-blocker prescription after myocardial infarction (MI) is recommended for all eligible patients. Numerous β-blocker choices are presently available with variable glycometabolic effects, which could be an important consideration in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Whether patients with DM preferentially receive β-blockers with favorable metabolic effects after MI and if this choice is associated with better glycemic control postdischarge is unknown.

METHODS

Among patients from 24 US hospitals enrolled in an MI registry (2005-2008), we investigated the frequency of "DM-friendly" β-blocker prescription at discharge by DM status. β-Blockers were classified as DM-friendly (eg, carvedilol and labetalol) or non-DM-friendly (eg, metoprolol and atenolol), based on their effects on glycemic control. Hierarchical, multivariable logistic regression examined the association of DM with DM-friendly β-blocker use. Among DM patients, we examined the association of DM-friendly β-blockers with worsened glycemic control at 6 months after MI.

RESULTS

Of 4,031 MI patients, 1,382 (34%) had DM. β-Blockers were prescribed at discharge in 93% of patients. Diabetes mellitus-friendly β-blocker use was low regardless of DM status, although patients with DM were more likely to be discharged on a DM-friendly β-blocker compared with patients without DM (13.5% vs 10.3%, P = .003), an association that remained after multivariable adjustment (odds ratio 1.41, 95% CI 1.13-1.77). There was a trend toward a lower risk of worsened glucose control at 6 months in DM patients prescribed DM-friendly versus non-DM-friendly β-blockers (Relative Risk 0.80, 95% CI 0.60-1.08).

CONCLUSION

Most DM patients were prescribed non-DM-friendly β-blockers-a practice that was associated with a trend toward worse glycemic control postdischarge. Although in need of further confirmation in larger studies, our findings highlight an opportunity to improve current practices of β-blockers use in patients with DM.

Expert consensus on blood pressure management of diabetic patients in China

This Expert Consensus proposed by the Chinese Society of Endocrinology (CSE) updates concepts on hypertension management in patients with diabetes. It focuses on clinical outcomes literature published within the past 5 years and currently in press, and incorporates these new observations into modifications of established guidelines. Complications and mortality in diabetic patients are increased when hypertension is present. The present update focuses on questions such as what to do when a diabetic patient has an elevated blood pressure level when therapy is initiated and whether combinations of agents should be used as soon as possible. Although the strategies and principles of treatment remain unchanged, approaches to specific patient-related issues influencing cardiovascular outcomes in people with diabetes have changed. Finally, an updated integrated management of multiple cardiovascular risk factors is provided and is suggested as a starting point to achieve blood pressure goals. In addition to controlling blood pressure, the CSE suggests that individualized strategies are equally important and that attention should be paid to other factors, including safety (which is the most important), feasibility, and health economic evaluation.

IgA nephropathy with early kidney disease is associated with increased arterial stiffness and renin-angiotensin system activity

BACKGROUND

IgA nephropathy is associated with increased cardiovascular risk, though whether this is due to loss of kidney function or proteinuria is unclear.

METHODS

For this study 10 normotensive IgA nephropathy subjects with early kidney disease (41±5 yrs, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 87±9 ml/min, proteinuria 720±300 mg/d) and 10 gender- and blood pressure-matched healthy controls (36±1 yrs, estimated GFR 102±5 ml/min, proteinuria 70±6 mg/d) were studied in high-salt balance. Blood pressure and arterial stiffness, expressed as pulse wave velocity and aortic augmentation index, were measured at baseline and in response to 60 min of angiotensin II (AngII) infusion.

RESULTS

At baseline, IgA nephropathy subjects demonstrated similar pulse wave velocity (8.6±0.7 vs. 8.0±0.4 m/s, p=0.5) but increased aortic augmentation index (12.6±3.1 vs. 1.8±4%, p=0.04) and a trend towards increased circulating renin-angiotensin system (RAS) components (plasma renin activity, 0.55±0.18 vs. 0.21±0.05 ng/l/s, p=0.08; angiotensin II, 25±5 vs. 16±1 ng/l, p=0.08) compared with controls. However, despite similar baseline blood pressure values (p=0.8), IgA nephropathy was associated with reduced arterial sensitivity to AngII challenge (Δmean arterial pressure: 19±4 vs. 29±1 mm Hg, p=0.05; Δpulse wave velocity: -0.06±0.6 vs. 1.5±0.3 m/s, p=0.07) compared with controls, even after multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Even in the setting of early kidney disease, IgA nephropathy is associated with increased arterial stiffness and decreased angiotensin II responsiveness, a marker of increased RAS activity.

Efficacy and safety of dual calcium channel blockade for the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dual calcium-channel blocker (CCB) with a dihydropyridine (DHP) and a nondihydropyridine (NDHP) has been proposed for hypertension treatment. However, the safety and efficacy of this approach is not well known.

METHODS

A MEDLINE/EMBASE/CENTRAL search for randomized clinical trials published on this topic from 1966 to February 2012 was performed. Efficacy outcomes of decrease in systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures from baseline, changes in heart rate (HR), and adverse effects were compared between dual CCB therapy vs. DHP or NDHP. SBP, DBP, and HR were expressed as weighted mean deviation (WMD).

RESULTS

A total of 6 studies with 153 patients were included. Dual CCB produced a significantly greater reduction in SBP (21.6±9.2 mmHg) from baseline than DHP (10.3±6.3 mmHg (WMD = 10.9 mmHg, P < 0.0001)) or NDHP (8.9±4.2 mmHg (WMD = 14.1 mmHg, P = 0.002)). Dual CCB therapy reduced DBP from baseline more than either monotherapy (dual CCB = 17.5±10.2 mmHg vs. DHP = 11.6±8.7 mmHg, WMD = 5.5 mmHg, P < 0.001; and NDHP = 10.5±5.6 mmHg, WMD = 5.3 mmHg, P = 0.03). Dual CCB therapy had significantly lower HR compared to DHP (P < 0.001) but was comparable to NDHP (P = 0.12) (Delta change dual CCB = -4.0±3.5 vs. DHP = -2.0±1.5 and NDHP = -6.0±5.0 beats/min). Dual CCB therapy did not increase adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual CCB therapy lowers blood pressure significantly better than CCB monotherapy, without an increase in adverse events. However, given the lack of long-term outcome data on efficacy and safety, dual CCB therapy should be used with restraint, if at all. Large-scale long-term trials are needed to further evaluate such a strategy.

Prophylactic treatment with telmisartan induces tissue-specific gene modulation favoring normal glucose homeostasis in Cohen-Rosenthal diabetic hypertensive rats

The objectives were to assess the potential of long-term prophylactic administration of telmisartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist and a partial peroxisome proliferator activator receptor (PPAR)γ agonist, in preventing the development of hypertension and hyperglycemia and to demonstrate the alteration in gene expression associated with the development of hyperglycemia and insulin resistance in Cohen-Rosenthal diabetic hypertensive rat, a unique model of hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus comorbidity. Cohen-Rosenthal diabetic hypertensive rats were continuously treated with telmisartan (3 mg/[kg d]) starting at age 6 to 8 weeks before developing hypertension or diabetes. Weight changes, blood pressure, blood insulin, adiponectin, glucose tolerance, and insulin sensitivity were monitored. Fat, liver, and muscle messenger RNAs were examined for the expression of genes potentially involved in the onset of insulin resistance. In addition to the expected antihypertensive effect of prophylactic telmisartan, diabetes was blunted, evidenced at the end of the study by a significantly lower glucose level. This was accompanied by improved glucose tolerance, increased sensitivity to insulin, reduction in fasting insulin levels and homeostasis model assessment index, as well as an increase in serum adiponectin. Telmisartan also prevented the increase in serum triglycerides and the associated appearance of lipid droplets in the liver. Diabetes induced tissue-specific changes in messenger RNAs expression of the following selected genes, which were restored by telmisartan treatment: PPARγ, PPARδ, PPARγ coactivator 1α, adiponectin, adiponectin receptor 1, adiponectin receptor 2, phosphotyrosine binding domain and a pleckstrin homology domain-containing adaptor protein, adenosine monophosphate kinase, and glucose translocator 4. Telmisartan blunted the development of hypertension, insulin resistance, and diabetes in prediabetic Cohen-Rosenthal diabetic hypertensive rats through pleiotropic activity, involving specific gene regulation of target organs.

Comparison of aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy and amlodipine monotherapy in patients with stage 2 systolic hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Patients with stage 2 hypertension and diabetes are at high cardiovascular risk and require large blood pressure (BP) reductions to reach treatment goals. This randomized double-blind study compared aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combination therapy with amlodipine monotherapy in 860 patients with mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP) ≥160 mm Hg to <200 mm Hg and type 2 diabetes. Patients received either once-daily aliskiren/HCTZ 150/12.5 mg or amlodipine 5 mg for 1 week then force-titrated to double the doses for 7 weeks. Baseline BP was 167.7/91.4 mm Hg. At week 8 end point, aliskiren/HCTZ provided significantly greater reductions in msSBP than amlodipine (28.8 mm Hg vs 26.2 mm Hg; P<.05). Mean sitting diastolic BP reductions were similar with aliskiren/HCTZ (9.9 mm Hg) and amlodipine (9.0 mm Hg). Achievement of BP control (<130/80 mm Hg) was significantly greater with aliskiren/HCTZ (23.2%) than amlodipine (13.8%; P<.0001). Aliskiren/HCTZ provides substantial msSBP reductions and greater BP control rates than amlodipine, and offers an attractive treatment option for patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus.

Seated cuff blood pressure-lowering efficacy of an olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment regimen in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is a common co-morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and well tolerated, effective therapies are needed to achieve guideline-recommended blood pressure (BP) goals in these patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to present the results of a prespecified analysis of key secondary endpoints from a 12-week, open-label, single-arm study evaluating the efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

After a placebo run-in period, 192 patients received olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg/day for 3 weeks. If BP remained ≥ 120/70 mmHg, patients were uptitrated at 3-week intervals to olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/day, olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg/day, and olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ 40/25 mg/day.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Endpoints evaluated in this analysis were the change from baseline in mean seated cuff BP (SeBP), proportions of patients achieving SeBP goals, and distribution of SeBP reductions.

RESULTS

Mean SeBP was 158.1/90.0 mmHg at baseline. The mean ± standard error of BP reductions at 12 weeks for systolic and diastolic BP were 21.3 ± 1.1 mmHg and 9.8 ± 0.6 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.0001 for each). At the end of the study, the proportion of patients with diabetes achieving the recommended SeBP goal of <130/80 mmHg was 41.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

An olmesartan medoxomil ± HCTZ treatment regimen significantly reduced BP from baseline in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00403481.

Impact of trandolapril therapy and its combination with a calcium channel blocker on plasma adiponectin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Adiponectin is secreted from adipose tissue and exhibits a protective effect against cardiovascular disease; plasma adiponectin concentrations are decreased in type 2 diabetic and in hypertensive patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of trandolapril (T) and its fixed-dose combination with verapamil (FDTV) on adiponectin levels in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients.

METHODS

A total of 40 type 2 diabetic patients with never-treated hypertension were randomly assigned to two groups. One group received FDTV 180 mg + T 2 mg, once a day; the other group received T 2 mg once a day, administered for 3 months in both groups. Adiponectin was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) at the beginning and end of the study. Patients were evaluated monthly for blood pressure, fasting serum glucose and adverse events. Statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

All patients experienced a significant reduction of blood pressure. Both therapeutics regimens increased the levels of adiponectin, However, FDTV produces a higher increase in the levels of the hormone (8.15 ± 4.6 to 10.96 ± 5.6 µg/ml) when compared with the T treatment (7.64 ± 3.8 to 8.92 ± 4.4 µg/ml), p < 0.05. None of the patients suffered adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that the addition of FDTV to T produced a greater increase on adiponectin levels than trandolapril alone.

Effect of adding pharmacists to primary care teams on blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of adding pharmacists to primary care teams on the management of hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled trial with blinded ascertainment of outcomes within primary care clinics in Edmonton, Canada. Pharmacists performed medication assessments and limited history and physical examinations and provided guideline-concordant recommendations to optimize medication management. Follow-up contact was completed as necessary. Control patients received usual care. The primary outcome was a ≥10% decrease in systolic blood pressure at 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 260 patients were enrolled, 57% were women, the mean age was 59 years, diabetes duration was 6 years, and blood pressure was 129/74 mmHg. Forty-eight of 131 (37%) intervention patients and 30 of 129 (23%) control patients achieved the primary outcome (odds ratio 1.9 [95% CI 1.1-3.3]; P = 0.02). Among 153 patients with inadequately controlled hypertension at baseline, intervention patients (n = 82) were significantly more likely than control patients (n = 71) to achieve the primary outcome (41 [50%] vs. 20 [28%]; 2.6 [1.3-5.0]; P = 0.007) and recommended blood pressure targets (44 [54%] vs. 21 [30%]; 2.8 [1.4-5.4]; P = 0.003). The 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease, based on changes to the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine, were predicted to decrease by 3% for intervention patients and 1% for control patients (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly more patients with type 2 diabetes achieved better blood pressure control when pharmacists were added to primary care teams, which suggests that pharmacists can make important contributions to the primary care of these patients.

Resistant hypertension in office practice: a clinical approach

Resistant hypertension is defined as blood pressure uncontrolled to guideline levels despite the use of ≥3 antihypertensive medications. When evaluating patients with resistant hypertension, it is important to consider issues such as blood pressure measurement technique, lifestyle, other comorbid conditions and medications, and the white coat effect. To this point, potential contributing factors include obstructive sleep apnea, excess alcohol intake, and use of blood pressure-elevating medications, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, sympathomimetics, certain anorexic agents, and oral contraceptives. Secondary causes of hypertension are common in patients with resistant hypertension and appropriate screening tests should be performed as suggested by signs, symptoms, and laboratory abnormalities. In this regard, there is increasing evidence that hyperaldosteronism is common in the resistant hypertensive patient group. Pharmacologic therapy in patients with resistant hypertension is centered on drug combinations that have different mechanisms of action, including diuretics, which are essential in maximizing antihypertensive effects. The role of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists is expanding, especially in patients with the metabolic syndrome, where aldosterone excess is increasingly recognized as an etiology of resistant hypertension. Finally, when appropriate, specialist referral may be necessary to appropriately assess and treat these patients.

Efficacy of an olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment algorithm in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes: analysis of diurnal blood pressure control as assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

Objective: Secondary, prespecified analysis of a single-arm, open-label study evaluating the efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil (OM) plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes.

Methods: After placebo run-in, 192 patients received OM 20 mg/day for 3 weeks. If blood pressure (BP) remained ≥120/70 mmHg, patients were uptitrated every 3 weeks to OM 40 mg/day, OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg/day, and OM/HCTZ 40/25 mg/day. Efficacy was evaluated by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring. Secondary endpoints included changes in ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) during daytime (08:00 to 16:00) and nighttime (22:00 to 06:00), as well as achievement of prespecified ambulatory BP targets in the total cohort and subgroups based on gender, race, hypertension severity, and age (≥65 or <65 years). Dipper status (nocturnal decrease in BP ≥10% of mean daytime BP) was assessed.

Results: At baseline, mean ambulatory BP was 151.2 ± 12.7/87.6 ± 9.0 mmHg during the daytime and 140.3 ± 13.1/78.1 ± 8.6 mmHg during the nighttime. Mean daytime and nighttime ambulatory BP was reduced from baseline by 22.3 ± 13.7/12.0 ± 8.9 mmHg and 18.8 ± 12.4/ 10.2 ± 7.2 mmHg, respectively. The reduction in daytime ambulatory SBP was 24.4 ± 11.8 mmHg in Blacks, 21.7 ± 14.2 mmHg in non-Blacks, 23.6 ± 12.3 mmHg in females, 21.2 ± 14.8 mmHg in males, 23.4 ± 11.6 mmHg in patients aged ≥65 years, and 21.9 ± 14.4 mmHg in those aged <65 years. Ambulatory BP targets of <130/80, <125/75, and <120/80 mmHg were reached by 51.7%, 36.0%, and 32.6% of patients during the daytime and 69.8%, 60.5%, and 50.6% of patients during the nighttime. After 12 weeks of treatment, 36.4% of baseline nondippers converted to dippers.

Conclusions: OM ± HCTZ effectively lowered ambulatory BP in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension, enabling them to achieve ambulatory BP targets during both the daytime and nighttime.

Best strategies for hypertension management in type 2 diabetes and obesity

Insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, hypertension, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease cluster together, and the incidence of all of these disease states is increasing throughout the world. Current strategies for hypertension management-including the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium antagonists, and thiazide diuretics-are effective for most patients. However, as the incidence of hypertension increases in this target population, so does that of resistant hypertension. As such, significant research and effort must be put forth to bring blood pressure to goal and delay or prevent target organ damage. Such efforts should frequently include a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker such as amlodipine. Other agents that are currently underused in this population for the treatment of resistant hypertension include nebivolol, carvedilol, aliskiren, and aldosterone antagonists. Finally, significant potential is seen for darusentan, an endothelin antagonist, if it comes to market.

Aldosterone: role in the cardiometabolic syndrome and resistant hypertension

The prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing in concert with obesity. Insulin resistance, metabolic dyslipidemia, central obesity, albuminuria. and hypertension commonly cluster to comprise the cardiometabolic syndrome (CMS). Emerging evidence supports a shift in our understanding of the crucial role of elevated serum aldosterone in promoting insulin resistance and resistant hypertension. Aldosterone enhances tissue generation of oxygen free radicals and systemic inflammation. This increase in oxidative stress and inflammation, in turn, contributes to impaired insulin metabolic signaling, reduced endothelial-mediated vasorelaxation, and associated cardiovascular and renal structural and functional abnormalities. In this context, recent investigation indicates that hyperaldosteronism, which is often associated with obesity, contributes to impaired pancreatic beta-cell function as well as diminished skeletal muscle insulin metabolic signaling. Accumulating evidence indicates that the cardiovascular and renal abnormalities associated with insulin resistance are mediated, in part, by aldosterone's nongenomic as well as genomic signaling through the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR). In the CMS, there are increased circulating levels of glucocorticoids, which can also activate MR signaling in cardiovascular, adipose, skeletal muscle, neuronal, and liver tissue. Furthermore, there is increasing evidence that fat tissue produces a lipid soluble factor that stimulates aldosterone production from the adrenal zona glomerulosa. Recently, we have learned that MR blockade improves pancreatic insulin release, insulin-mediated glucose utilization, and endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation as well as reduces the progression of CVD and CKD. In summary, aldosterone excess exerts detrimental metabolic effects that contribute to the development of the CMS and resistant hypertension as well as CVD and CKD.

Overcoming clinical inertia to achieve blood pressure goals: the role of fixed-dose combination therapy

The treatment of hypertension should cause blood pressure (BP) changes that reduce the long-term risks of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. There are considerable clinical benefits to be gained by promptly treating patients to recognized BP goals, particularly for those at high risk. This may be achieved by the use of combination therapy as first-line treatment. However, despite widely acknowledged therapeutic guidelines, there are significant gaps between current treatment recommendations and their implementation in clinical practice. One important explanation for inadequate treatment and subsequent poor BP control is clinical inertia. Undertreatment and clinical inertia may sometimes be mistaken for treatment-resistant hypertension, as is often the case in specific patient populations whose disease is often considered a challenge to treat because of a greater risk of cardiovascular complications (e.g. Blacks, obese patients, and those with diabetes). The availability of fixed-dose drug combinations may address some of the common misconceptions thought to promote clinical inertia. Few studies have specifically focused on subpopulations with difficult-to-treat hypertension that is uncontrolled on monotherapies. One example is an ongoing 20-week, multicenter, prospective, blinded endpoint, dose-titration, treat-to-goal study evaluating the efficacy and safety of initial fixed-dose combination therapy with amlodipine/olmesartan medoxomil, and further up-titration with hydrochlorothiazide, in patients with hypertension who are uncontrolled on antihypertensive monotherapy. This study may demonstrate the benefits of treating patients with hypertension to goal using initial fixed-dose combination therapy, even in patients considered to be at a higher risk of cardiovascular complications.

The kidney, hypertension, and remaining challenges

There is an epidemic of chronic kidney disease in the Western world, with hypertension being the second most common cause. Blood pressure control rates, while improving, are still below 50% for the United States population. The following three challenges remain for the treatment of hypertension and associated prevention of end-stage kidney disease. First, a better understanding by the general medical community of how and in whom to use renin angiotensin aldosterone system blockers is needed. Second, the appropriate initiation of fixed-dose combination therapy to achieve blood-pressure goals needs to be clarified. Finally, the subgroup of patients with kidney disease needs more aggressive blood pressure lowering.

The renin angiotensin aldosterone system in hypertension: roles of insulin resistance and oxidative stress

The relationship between HTNand other components of the CMSis complex. However, there is growing evidence that enhanced activation of the RAAS is a key factor in the development of endothelial dysfunction and HTN. Insulin resistance is induced by activation of the RAAS and resulting increases in ROS. This insulin resistance occurs in cardiovascular tissue and in tissues traditionally considered as targets for the action of insulin, such as muscle and liver. Indeed, there is a mounting body of evidence that the resultant insulin resistance in cardiovascular tissue and kidneys contributes to the development of endothelial dysfunction, HTN, atherosclerosis, CKD, and CVD.77 RAAS-associated signaling by way of the AT1R and MR, triggers tissue activation of the NADPH oxidase enzymatic activation and increased production of ROS. Oxidative stress in cardiovascular tissue is derived from both NADPH oxidase and mitochondrial generation of ROS, and is central to the development of insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction, HTN, and atherosclerosis. Pharmacologic blockade of the RAAS not only improves blood pressure, but alsohas a beneficial impact on inflammation, oxidative stress, insulin sensitivity, and glucose homeostasis. Several strategies are available for RAAS blockade, including ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and MR blockers, which have been proven in the clinical trials to result in improved CVD and CKD outcomes. New research in these areas will allow for a better understanding of the relationship between HTN, insulin resistance, and activation of the RAAS, which could result in newer alternatives for a more comprehensive management of HTN in the setting of the CMS..

Improving microvascular outcomes in patients with diabetes through management of hypertension

Diabetes mellitus is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and current opinion holds that hyperglycemia directly damages smaller blood vessels, resulting in microvascular complications of nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy. In a patient with diabetes, hypertension compounds and greatly increases the risk of microvascular complications, and thus the risk of end-stage kidney disease, vision loss, and nontraumatic limb amputations. Hypertension and hyperglycemia directly damage the microvasculature, leading to small vessel dysfunction that manifests as the clinical disease states of diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy. Early recognition and treatment of both hyperglycemia and hypertension may prevent vision loss and chronic kidney disease, the devastating outcomes of these microvascular complications. One of the pathogenic mechanisms for microvascular dysfunction is upregulation of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor, the most physiologically common receptor for the vasoconstrictor properties of angiotensin II. In patients with diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy, tight control of blood pressure (BP) (< 130/80 mm Hg) delays the progression of retinopathy and nephropathy in addition to reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Aggressive treatment with 2 or more antihypertensive agents, selected from different drug classes, is often needed to reach the optimal BP target level. A PubMed search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated hypertension control and microvascular outcomes in patients with diabetes. Several clinical trials have yielded promising data with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors (the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers). Attainment of BP control with RAAS inhibitors reduces the risk for CVD, nephropathy, and retinopathy. In addition, RAAS inhibitors have demonstrated renoprotective effectiveness independent of the BP reduction achieved. This review will examine the results of clinical trials in the context of BP control, diabetes, and the microvascular complications of retinopathy and nephropathy.