Serum glycated albumin, but not glycated hemoglobin, is low in relation to glycemia in men with hypertriglyceridemia

Limitations of glycated albumin standardization when applied to the assessment of diabetes patients

OBJECTIVES

Glycated albumin (GA) has potential value in the management of people with diabetes; however, to draw meaningful conclusions between clinical studies it is important that the GA values are comparable. This study investigates the standardization of the Norudia Glycated Albumin and Lucica Glycated Albumin-L methods.

METHODS

The manufacturer reported imprecision was verified by performing CLSI-EP15-A3 protocol using manufacturer produced controls. The Japanese Clinical Chemistry Reference Material (JCCRM)611-1 was measured 20 times to evaluate the accuracy of both methods. GA was also measured in 1,167 patient samples and results were compared between the methods in mmol/mol and %.

RESULTS

Maximum CV for Lucica was ≤0.6 % and for Norudia ≤1.8 % for control material. Results in mmol/mol and % of the JCCRM611-1 were within the uncertainty of the assigned values for both methods. In patient samples the relative difference in mmol/mol between the two methods ranged from -10.4 % at a GA value of 183 mmol/mol to +8.7 % at a GA value of 538 mmol/mol. However, the relative difference expressed in percentage units ranged from of 0 % at a GA value of 9.9 % to +1.7 % at a GA value of 30 %.

CONCLUSIONS

The results in mmol/mol between the two methods for the patient samples were significantly different compared to the results in %. It is not clear why patient samples behave differently compared to JCCRM611-1 material. Valuable lessons can be learnt from comparing the standardization process of GA with that of HbA1c.

Glycated serum proteins and albumin but not glycated albumin show negative correlation with BMI in an overweight/obese, diabetic population from the United States

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Multiple previously published studies have shown a weak to medium, negative correlation between BMI and glycated albumin (GA). However, many of these studies were in populations with a narrow range of BMI. It is unknown whether this trend exists if a wider BMI range is used. This is an important question for proper interpretation of GA levels in obese populations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of clinical trial data (NCT02519309) was performed. After appropriate exclusions, 334 subjects remained. These included 73.7% with type 2 diabetes (T2D) diagnosis and 26.3% with prediabetes. BMI ranged from 24.8-86.9 kg/m2. Laboratory data were measured in a CLIA-certified laboratory using commercially available, automated methods.

RESULTS

No significant, negative correlation was seen between GA and BMI. However, individual components (glycated serum proteins and albumin) as well as the GA/HbA1c ratio show a weak, negative correlation with BMI for all subjects and those with T2D. The strongest negative correlation was with albumin. Examination by traditional BMI subgroups also showed statistically significant differences for those with T2D, but not for the prediabetic cohort. Correlations between BMI and C-reactive protein were similar in those with diabetes and prediabetes; however, correlation between BMI and insulin was stronger in those with diabetes.

CONCLUSION

Negative correlations between BMI and albumin or BMI and glycated serum proteins persist in diabetic populations that are obese and overweight, even when a statistically significant negative correlation is not observed between BMI and GA. Inflammation or insulin-mediated changes in protein synthesis could be contributors to these negative correlations, but BMI-related changes to the glomerulus could also affect clearance of albumin or glycated proteins and should be examined.

Recent Updates and Advances in the Use of Glycated Albumin for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Diabetes and Renal, Cerebro- and Cardio-Metabolic Diseases

Diabetes mellitus is a heterogeneous and dysmetabolic chronic disease in which the laboratory plays a fundamental role, from diagnosis to monitoring therapy and studying complications. Early diagnosis and good glycemic control should start as early as possible to delay and prevent metabolic and cardio-vascular complications secondary to this disease. Glycated hemoglobin is currently used as the reference parameter. The accuracy of the glycated hemoglobin dosage may be compromised in subjects suffering from chronic renal failure and terminal nephropathy, affected by the reduction in the survival of erythrocytes, with consequent decrease in the time available for glucose to attach to the hemoglobin. In the presence of these renal comorbidities as well as hemoglobinopathies and pregnancy, glycated hemoglobin is not reliable. In such conditions, dosage of glycated albumin can help. Glycated albumin is not only useful for short-term diagnosis and monitoring but predicts the risk of diabetes, even in the presence of euglycemia. This protein is modified in subjects who do not yet have a glycemic alteration but, as a predictive factor, heralds the risk of diabetic disease. This review summarizes the importance of glycated albumin as a biomarker for predicting and stratifying the cardiovascular risk linked to multiorgan metabolic alterations.

Diabetes mellitus in chronic kidney disease: Biomarkers beyond HbA1c to estimate glycemic control and diabetes-dependent morbidity and mortality

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Optimal glycemic control contributes to improved outcomes in patients with DM, particularly for microvascular damage, but blood glucose levels are too variable to provide an accurate assessment and instead markers averaging long-term glycemic load are used. The most established glycemic biomarker of long-term glycemic control is HbA1c. Nevertheless, HbA1c has pitfalls that limit its accuracy to estimate glycemic control, including the presence of altered red blood cell survival, hemoglobin glycation and suboptimal performance of HbA1c assays. Alternative methods to evaluate glycemic control in patients with DM include glycated albumin, fructosamine, 1-5 anhydroglucitol, continuous glucose measurement, self-monitoring of blood glucose and random blood glucose concentration measurements. Accordingly, our aim was to review the advantages and pitfalls of these methods in the context of CKD.

Results of a Study Comparing Glycated Albumin to Other Glycemic Indices

CONTEXT

Intermediate-term glycemic control metrics fulfill a need for measures beyond hemoglobin A1C.

OBJECTIVE

Compare glycated albumin (GA), a 14-day blood glucose measure, with other glycemic indices.

DESIGN

24-week prospective study of assay performance.

SETTING

8 US clinics.

PARTICIPANTS

Subjects with type 1 (n = 73) and type 2 diabetes (n = 77) undergoing changes to improve glycemic control (n = 98) or with stable diabetes therapy (n = 52).

INTERVENTIONS

GA, fructosamine, and A1C measured at prespecified intervals. Mean blood glucose (MBG) calculated using weekly self-monitored blood glucose profiles.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary: Pearson correlation between GA and fructosamine. Secondary: magnitude (Spearman correlation) and direction (Kendall correlation) of change of glycemic indices in the first 3 months after a change in diabetes management.

RESULTS

GA was more concordant (60.8%) with changes in MBG than fructosamine (55.5%) or A1C (45.5%). Across all subjects and visits, the GA Pearson correlation with fructosamine was 0.920. Pearson correlations with A1C were 0.655 for GA and 0.515 for fructosamine (P < .001) and with MBG were 0.590 and 0.454, respectively (P < .001). At the individual subject level, Pearson correlations with both A1C and MBG were higher for GA than for fructosamine in 56% of subjects; only 4% of subjects had higher fructosamine correlations with A1C and MBG. GA had a higher Pearson correlation with A1C and MBG in 82% and 70% of subjects, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with fructosamine, GA correlates significantly better with both short-term MBG and long-term A1C and may be more useful than fructosamine in clinical situations requiring monitoring of intermediate-term glycemic control (NCT02489773).

Methylglyoxal, Glycated Albumin, PAF, and TNF-α: Possible Inflammatory and Metabolic Biomarkers for Management of Gestational Diabetes

Background: In gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), pancreatic β-cell breakdown can result from a proinflammatory imbalance created by a sustained level of cytokines. In this study, we investigated the role of specific cytokines, such as B-cell activating factor (BAFF), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and platelet-activating factor (PAF), together with methylglyoxal (MGO) and glycated albumin (GA) in pregnant women affected by GDM. Methods: We enrolled 30 women whose inflammation and metabolic markers were measured at recruitment and after 12 weeks of strict dietetic therapy. We compared these data to the data obtained from 53 randomly selected healthy nonpregnant subjects without diabetes, hyperglycemia, or any condition that can affect glycemic metabolism. Results: In pregnant women affected by GDM, PAF levels increased from 26.3 (17.4–47.5) ng/mL to 40.1 (30.5–80.5) ng/mL (p < 0.001). Their TNF-α levels increased from 3.0 (2.8–3.5) pg/mL to 3.4 (3.1–5.8) pg/mL (p < 0.001). The levels of methylglyoxal were significantly higher in the women with GDM (p < 0.001), both at diagnosis and after 12 weeks (0.64 (0.46–0.90) μg/mL; 0.71 (0.47–0.93) μg/mL, respectively) compared to general population (0.25 (0.19–0.28) μg/mL). Levels of glycated albumin were significantly higher in women with GDM (p < 0.001) only after 12 weeks from diagnosis (1.51 (0.88–2.03) nmol/mL) compared to general population (0.95 (0.63–1.4) nmol/mL). Conclusion: These findings support the involvement of new inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers in the mechanisms related to GDM complications and prompt deeper exploration into the vicious cycle connecting inflammation, oxidative stress, and metabolic results.

Challenges in diagnosing and monitoring diabetes in patients with chronic liver diseases

The prevalence and mortality of diabetes mellitus and liver disease have risen in recent years. The liver plays an important role in glucose homeostasis, and various chronic liver diseases have a negative effect on glucose metabolism with the consequent emergence of diabetes. Some aspects related to chronic liver disease can affect diagnostic tools and the monitoring of diabetes and other glucose metabolism disorders, and clinicians must be aware of these limitations in their daily practice. In cirrhotic patients, fasting glucose may be normal in up until 23% of diabetes cases, and glycated hemoglobin provides falsely low results, especially in advanced cirrhosis. Similarly, the performance of alternative glucose monitoring tests, such as fructosamine, glycated albumin and 1,5-anhydroglucitol, also appears to be suboptimal in chronic liver disease. This review will examine the association between changes in glucose metabolism and various liver diseases as well as the particularities associated with the diagnosis and monitoring of diabetes in liver disease patients. Alternatives to routinely recommended tests will be discussed.

Metrics Beyond Hemoglobin A1C in Diabetes Management: Time in Range, Hypoglycemia, and Other Parameters

We review clinical instances in which A1C should not be used and reflect on the use of other glucose metrics that can be used, in substitution of or in combination with A1C and SMBG, to tailor an individualized approach that will result in better outcomes and patient empowerment.

Glycated albumin: from biochemistry and laboratory medicine to clinical practice

This review summarizes current knowledge about glycated albumin. We review the changes induced by glycation on the properties of albumin, the pathological implications of high glycated albumin levels, glycated albumin quantification methods, and the use of glycated albumin as a complementary biomarker for diabetes mellitus diagnosis and monitoring and for dealing with long-term complications. The advantages and limits of this biomarker in different clinical settings are also discussed.

Methods, units and quality requirements for the analysis of haemoglobin A1c in diabetes mellitus

The formation of glycohemoglobin, especially the hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c) fraction, occurs when glucose becomes coupled with the amino acid valine in the β-chain of Hb; this reaction is dependent on the plasma concentration of glucose. Since the early 1970s it has been known that diabetics display higher values OF HbA_1C because they have elevated blood glucose concentrations. Thus HbA_1c has acquired a very important role in the treatment and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. After the introduction of the first quantitative measurement OF HbA_1C, numerous methods for glycohemoglobin have been introduced with different assay principles: From a simple mini-column technique to the very accurate automated high-pressure chromatography and lastly to many automated immunochemical or enzymatic assays. In early days, the results of the quality control reports for HbA_1c varied extensively between laboratories, therefore in United States and Canada working groups (WG) of the Diabetes Controls and Complications Trial (DCCT) were set up to standardize the HbA_1c assays against the DCCT/National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program reference method based on liquid chromatography. In the 1990s, the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) appointed a new WG to plan a reference preparation and method for the HBA_1c measurement. When the reference procedures were established, in 2004 IFCC recommended that all manufacturers for equipment used in HbA_1c assays should calibrate their methods to their proposals. This led to an improvement in the coefficient of variation (CV%) associated with the assay. In this review, we describe the glycation of Hb, methods, standardization of the HbA_1c assays, analytical problems, problems with the units in which HbA_1c values are expressed, reference values, quality control aspects, target requirements for HbA_1c, and the relationship of the plasma glucose values to HbA_1c concentrations. We also note that the acceptance of the mmol/mol system for HbA_1c as recommended by IFCC, i.e., the new unit and reference ranges, are becoming only slowly accepted outside of Europe where it seems that expressing HbA_1c values either only in per cent units or with parallel reporting of percent and mmol/mol will continue. We believe that these issues should be resolved in the future and that it would avoid confusion if mmol/mol unit for HbA_1c were to gain worldwide acceptance.

Glycated Serum Albumin and AGE Receptors

In vivo modification of proteins by molecules with reactive carbonyl groups leads to intermediate and advanced glycation end products (AGE). Glucose is a significant glycation reagent due to its high physiological concentration and poorly controlled diabetics show increased albumin glycation. Increased levels of glycated and AGE-modified albumin have been linked to diabetic complications, neurodegeneration, and vascular disease. This review discusses glycated albumin formation, structural consequences of albumin glycation on drug binding, removal of circulating AGE by several scavenger receptors, as well as AGE-induced proinflammatory signaling through activation of the receptor for AGE. Analytical methods for quantitative detection of protein glycation and AGE formation are compared. Finally, the use of glycated albumin as a novel clinical marker to monitor glycemic control is discussed and compared to glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as long-term indicator of glycemic status.

1,5-Anhydroglucitol and glycated albumin in glycemia

The main purpose of treating diabetes is to prevent the onset and the progression of diabetic chronic complications. Since the mechanism of onset of chronic complications is still not well understood, the main strategy to achieve this purpose is to bring the plasma glucose level in diabetic patients as close as possible to that in healthy subjects and try to maintain good glycemic control over the long term. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), glycated albumin (GA), fructosamine, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5 AG) are used for evaluating glycemic control. At present, HbA1c is widely used as a gold standard index for glycemic control in clinical practice. While HbA1c reflects the long-term glycemic control state (for the past 1-2 months), it does not accurately reflect glycemic control in the clinical state in which glycemic control improves or deteriorates in the short-term. It is also known that HbA1c in patients with hematological disorders such as anemia and variant hemoglobin shows an abnormal value. In addition, HbA1c mainly reflects the mean plasma glucose but does not reflect the postprandial plasma glucose. On the other hand, GA and 1,5-AG reflect intermediate- or short-term glycemic control and are not influenced by hemoglobin metabolism. While 1,5-AG is known to reflect the postprandial plasma glucose, it was shown recently that GA also reflects the postprandial plasma glucose. This chapter summarizes the measurement methods, usage methods, evidence, and problems concerning such indices for glycemic control.

Glycated albumin; clinical usefulness

The main purpose of treating diabetes is to prevent the onset and progression of diabetic chronic complications. Since the mechanism of onset of chronic complications is still not well understood, the main strategy to achieve this purpose is to bring plasma glucose levels as close as possible to those in healthy subjects and maintain good glycemic control over the long term. Since glycation among various proteins is increased in diabetic patients compared with non-diabetic subjects, glycated protein can be used as a glycemic control indicator. Currently, among these glycated proteins, HbA1c is used as the gold standard of glycemic control indicators. However, HbA1c does not accurately reflect the actual status of glycemic control in some conditions with rapid changes in glycemic control and in patients with anemia (hemolytic anemia, iron deficiency anemia, etc.) and variant hemoglobin. In comparison, glycated albumin (GA) more accurately reflects changes in plasma glucose during the short term and postprandial plasma glucose. GA also reflects glycemic control in patients with hematologic disorders whereas GA does not reflect glycemic control in patients with disorder of albumin metabolism. GA is a glycemic control indicator which overcomes most of the disadvantages of HbA1c, and could be therefore expected to replace HbA1c as the standard glycemic control indicator in the near future. However, it is necessary to accumulate more evidences from large research studies on the effective directions for measuring GA.

The glycated albumin to glycated haemoglobin ratio increases along with the fibrosis stage in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

BACKGROUND

We previously reported that the indicator of glycaemic control, glycated albumin (GA) levels, are low in relation to glycaemia in patients with high alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease because of chronic inflammation, and that the GA/glycated haemoglobin ratio (G/H ratio) is inversely correlated with hepatic function in patients with chronic liver disease. The severity of liver fibrosis is known to be a good indicator for surveillance, and for determining the prognosis and optimal treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical usefulness of measuring the G/H ratio for predicting the severity of liver fibrosis in patients with NASH.

METHODS

The study subjects were 36 patients with histologically diagnosed NASH (19 men, 17 women; mean age 54.8±12.2 years, body mass index 28.3±5.0 kg/m2). The relationships of the G/H ratio to hepatic function tests and fibrosis stage in the liver were investigated.

RESULTS

The G/H ratio in patients with NASH was inversely correlated with ALT (P<0.001) and platelet count (P<0.0001). Furthermore, the G/H ratio was positively correlated with the fibrosis stage in liver (P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the G/H ratio increases along with the fibrosis stage in patients with NASH.

Clinical impact of glycated albumin as another glycemic control marker

It is known that glycation among various proteins is increased in diabetic patients compared with non-diabetic subjects. Currently, among these glycated proteins, glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1C)) is used as the gold standard index of glycemic control in clinical practice for diabetes treatment. However, HbA(1C) does not accurately reflect the actual status of glycemic control in some conditions where plasma glucose changes during short term, and in patients who have diseases such as anemia and variant hemoglobin. In comparison, another index of glycemic control, glycated albumin (GA), more accurately reflects changes in plasma glucose during short term and also postprandial plasma glucose. Although GA is not influenced by disorders of hemoglobin metabolism, it is affected by disorders of albumin metabolism. This review summarizes diseases and pathological conditions where GA measurement is useful. These include the status of glycemic control changes during short term, diseases which cause postprandial hyperglycemia, iron deficiency anemia, pregnancy, chronic liver disease (liver cirrhosis), chronic renal failure (diabetic nephropathy), and variant hemoglobin.