2023 Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased exponentially in many developed countries, including Australia and New Zealand. This Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation from the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) recognises healthcare factors, expertise and expenditure relevant to the Australian and New Zealand healthcare environments including considerations of potential implications for First Nations Peoples. The statement is cognisant of international advice but tailored to local conditions and populations, and is intended to be used by electrophysiologists, cardiologists and general physicians across all disciplines caring for patients with AF. They are also intended to provide guidance to healthcare facilities seeking to establish or maintain catheter ablation for AF.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Esophageal injury, perforation, and fistula formation following atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Esophageal perforation and fistula formation are rare but serious complications following atrial fibrillation ablation. In this review article, we outline the incidence, pathophysiology, predictors, and preventative strategies of this dreaded complication.

METHODS

We conducted an electronic search in 10 databases/electronic search engines to access relevant publications. All articles reporting complications following atrial fibrillation ablation, including esophageal injury and fistula formation, were included for systematic review.

RESULTS

A total of 130 manuscripts were identified for the final review process. The overall incidence of esophageal injury following atrial fibrillation ablation was significantly higher with thermal ablation modalities (radiofrequency 5-40%, cryoballoon 3-25%, high-intensity focused ultrasound < 10%) as opposed to non-thermal ablation modalities (no cases reported to date). The incidence of esophageal perforation and fistula formation with the use of thermal ablation modalities is estimated to occur in less than 0.25% of all atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. The use of luminal esophageal temperature monitoring probe and mechanical esophageal deviation showed protective effect toward reducing the incidence of this complication. The prognosis is very poor for patients who develop atrioesophageal fistula, and the condition is rapidly fatal without surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal perforation and fistula formation following atrial fibrillation ablation are rare complications with poor prognosis. Various strategies have been proposed to protect the esophagus and reduce the incidence of this fearful complication. Pulsed field ablation is a promising new ablation technology that may be the future answer toward reducing the incidence of esophageal complications.

Acquired atrioesophageal fistula: Need it be lethal? Sizing up the problem, diagnostic modalities, and best management

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

An atrioesophageal fistula is a devastating complication of ablation for atrial fibrillation. For the surgeon facing this dreaded complication, it may be a 'once in a lifetime' case. This review aims to describe the clinical problem and evaluate the outcome of different surgical techniques to start guiding cardiothoracic surgeons toward those which offer the best chance of survival.

METHODS

An electronic search retrieved 125 articles containing 195 cases of atrioesophageal fistula secondary to atrial fibrillation ablation. Reports of pericardio-esophageal or mediastino-esophageal fistula were excluded.

RESULTS

The median age was 61 and 143 (73%) cases occurred in males. Fever (n = 147; 75%) and neurological dysfunction (n = 151; 77%) were the most common symptoms. The median time from ablation to symptom onset was 21 days (interquartile range: 12-28). The most sensitive thoracic imaging modality was computed tomography (n = 135/153; 90%). Immediate deterioration occurred during 11/58 (19%) oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopies. Mortality was lower in patients who had surgery (39%) compared with endoscopic intervention (94%) or conservative management (97%). Patients who had atrial repair combined with esophageal repair or oesophagectomy were more likely to survive than those who had atrial repair alone (OR 6.97; p < .001). Isolation of the esophageal aspect of the fistula conferred an additional survival benefit (OR 5.85; p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Fever, neurological symptoms, and chest pain in the context of recent ablation should prompt immediate evaluation. Urgent CT thorax should be arranged and repeated if initially unremarkable. Esophageal instrumentation should be avoided due to the risk of catastrophic air embolism or massive hemorrhage. The best way forward is emergency surgical repair; the combination which offers the best survival benefit is atrial repair combined with esophageal surgery and isolation of the esophageal aspect of the fistula.

Preventing esophageal complications from atrial fibrillation ablation: A review

Atrioesophageal fistula is a life-threatening complication of ablation treatment for atrial fibrillation. Methods to reduce the risk of esophageal injury have evolved over the last decade, and diagnosis of this complication remains difficult and therefore challenging to treat in a timely manner. Delayed diagnosis leads to treatment occurring in the context of a critically ill patient, contributing to the poor prognosis associated with this complication. The associated mortality risk can be as high as 70%. Recent important advances in preventative techniques are explored in this review.

Preventative techniques used in current clinical practice are discussed, which include high-power short-duration ablation, esophageal temperature probe monitoring, cryotherapy and laser balloon technologies, and use of proton pump inhibitors. A lack of randomized clinical evidence for the effectiveness of these practical methods are found. Alternative methods of esophageal protection has emerged in recent years, including mechanical deviation of the esophagus and esophageal temperature control (esophageal cooling). Although these are fairly recent methods, we discuss the available evidence to date. Mechanical deviation of the esophagus is due to undergo its first randomized study. Recent randomized study on esophageal cooling has shown promise of its effectiveness in preventing thermal injuries. Lastly, novel ablation technology that may be the future of esophageal protection, pulsed field ablation, is discussed.

The findings of this review suggest that more robust clinical evidence for esophageal protection methods is warranted to improve the safety of atrial fibrillation ablation.

Optimal surgical approach to left atrioesophageal fistula following catheter radiofrequency ablation

Atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) formation is a rare but formidable complication after catheter radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation. We present four patients who underwent urgent primary intracardiac repair of the left atrium via sternotomy with central cardiopulmonary bypass and early aortic cross-clamp, followed by repair of the esophagus. We believe that this approach represents the safest strategy for addressing this morbid and often fatal complication.

Atrio-oesophageal fistula following atrial fibrillation ablation: how to manage this dreaded complication?

OBJECTIVES

Atrio-oesophageal fistula is a rare but serious complication of radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Therapeutic options are surgery, oesophageal stenting and conservative treatment (antibiotics and anticoagulation). However, there are no guidelines available. Since no article dwells on the technical considerations of this surgery, we aim to present here our experience and share our surgical approach.

METHODS

Between January 2012 and March 2020, all consecutive patients treated for atrio-oesophageal fistula following radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation at our institution were analysed retrospectively. The diagnosis was made on a set of clinical and radiological signs. All patients benefitted from a combined approach involving both digestive and cardiac surgeons. Femoro-femoral peripheral cardiopulmonary by-pass was used. The surgical approach was a right posterolateral thoracotomy. Atrial repair was done on fibrillating heart without cross-clamping, using a left atriotomy. Digestive management consisted of a total oesophagectomy.

RESULTS

We identified 6 patients with this complication. The median age was 53 [34-72] years. Symptoms were neurological symptoms, fever and chest pain. Diagnostic modalities were cerebral imaging, chest CT and transthoracic echocardiogram. Atrial repair consisted in a suture of the atrium or by using a pericardial patch. With a median follow-up of 3.1 [0.1-7.7] years, only one patient died during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience shows that an aggressive surgery with a large resection of the oesophagus and left atrial repair by right thoracotomy in the same time provides good results. The ability to involve simultaneously both experienced digestive and cardiac surgical teams is the key for this strategy.

Atrial Fibrillation (Part 2) - Catheter Ablation

Após mais de 20 anos desde sua utilização inicial, a ablação por cateter se tornou um procedimento rotineiramente realizado para tratamento de pacientes com fibrilação atrial (FA). Fundamentado inicialmente no isolamento elétrico das veias pulmonares em pacientes com FA paroxística, subsequentes avanços no entendimento da fisiopatologia levaram a técnicas adicionais não só para obter melhores resultados, mas também para tratar pacientes com formas persistentes de arritmia, assim como pacientes com cardiopatia estrutural e insuficiência cardíaca.

A novel treatment for esophageal lesions following atrial fibrillation ablation

This study presents a novel technique for the treatment of a deep esophageal ulcer after ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulmonary vein isolation was performed using a radiofrequency irrigated tip catheter. On Day 5 of follow-up, a deep esophageal ulcer was observed. No significant visual improvement was observed after conventional treatment. Endoscopic negative pressure therapy in the esophagus was then applied for 5 days. A significant decrease in diameter and depth of the lesion was observed, possibly preventing perforation. Endoscopic negative pressure therapy can be used to heal thermal lesions after AF ablation procedures.

Review of Thoracic Causes of Systemic Arterial Air Embolism on Computed Tomography

Systemic arterial air embolism (SAAE) is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition that may occur when air enters into pulmonary veins or directly into the systemic circulation after pulmonary procedures (biopsy or resection) or penetrating trauma to the lung. While venous air embolism is commonly reported, arterial air embolism is rare. Even a minor injury to the chest along with positive-pressure ventilation can cause SAAE. Small amounts of air may cause neurological or cardiac symptoms depending on the affected arteries, while massive embolism can result in fatal cardiovascular collapse. We discuss the various causes of SAAE, including trauma, computed tomography-guided lung biopsy, and various intervention procedures such as mechanical circulatory support device implantation, coronary catheterization, and atrial fibrillation repair. SAAE diagnosis can be overlooked because its symptoms are not specific, and confirmation of the presence of air in the arterial system is difficult. Although computed tomography is the optimal imaging tool for diagnosis, patient instability and resuscitation often precludes its use. When imaging is performed, awareness of the causes of SAAE allows the radiologist to promptly diagnose the condition and relay findings to the clinicians so that treatment, namely hyperbaric oxygen therapy, may be started promptly.

Atrioesophageal fistula after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: A case report

RATIONALE

Atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare but serious complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation with associated high mortality rates.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 42-year-old male patient who underwent catheter ablation in local hospital 20 days ago because of persistent AF was admitted to our Emergency Room with unconsciousness and high axillary temperature and white blood cell count. Craniocerebral CT scan found multiple infarct lesions in both frontal and occipital lobes. Pneumatosis between the left atrium and the esophagus was observed in the chest CT.

DIAGNOSES

AEF.

INTERVENTIONS

We performed a salvage operation of the left atrium debridement, and left atrium patch repairing under extracorporeal circulation. We opened the mediastinum, and dissected the esophageal perforation. A special irrigating catheter with multiple side ports on the tip was placed from the esophagus to the posterior mediastinum through the esophageal orificium fistulae. We also inserted a gastrointestinal tube to the jejunum under gastroscopy. Three additional drainage tubes were inserted into the esophageal bed and the right thoracic cavity.

OUTCOMES

The procedure was successful. But 7 days later, the patient's family chose to forgo treatment due to multiple cerebral infarcts, respiratory and blood system infection, liver failure, and other complications.

LESSONS

AEF is a rare but fatal complication after catheter ablation. Heightened vigilance is required for early recognition of the AEF. Surgical treatment should be performed as early as possible, especially before the neurological complications occur.

Catheter-related complications and mortality of atrial fibrillation ablation following introduction of contact force-sensing technology

OBJECTIVES

Contact force-sensing catheters allow real-time catheter-tissue contact force monitoring during atrial fibrillation. These catheters were rapidly adopted into clinical practice following market introduction in 2014, but concerns have been raised regarding collateral damage such as esophageal injury. We sought to examine whether the introduction of force-sensing catheters was associated with a change in short-term and intermediate-term acute care use, complications and mortality following atrial fibrillation ablation.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis. We used inverse probability treatment weight matching to account for the differences in baseline characteristics between groups.

SETTING

We examined patients included in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse who underwent ablation for atrial fibrillation before (2011-2013) and after (2015-2017) the market introduction of contact force-sensing catheters.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We examined 30-day and 90-day rates of all-cause acute care use, including hospitalizations and emergency department visits, as well as death and hospitalization for catheter-related complications, including atrioesophageal fistula, pericarditis, cardiac tamponade/perforation and stroke/transient ischemic attack.

RESULTS

Our sample included 3470 and 5772 patients who underwent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation before and after market introduction of contact force-sensing catheters, respectively. Complication rates were low and did not differ between the two periods (p>0.10 for each outcome). The 30-day and 90-day mortality was 0.1% and 0.3%, respectively after market introduction and unchanged from prior to 2014. The 90-day rates of all-cause acute care use decreased, from 27.0% in 2011-2013 to 23.9% in 2015-2017 (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

AF ablation-related catheter complications and mortality are low and there has been no significant change following the introduction of force-sensing catheters.

Atrio-esophageal Fistula Secondary to Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

An atrio-esophageal fistula is an exceedingly rare but devastating complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures. Delays to diagnosis and definitive treatment herald a poor prognosis, with the development of catastrophic neurological injury or death secondary to cerebral air emboli. A high level of suspicion is essential to improve recognition of this rare but devastating condition.

CASE REPORT

A 59-year-old man presented to the emergency department with an acute stroke and reduced consciousness. This presentation was preceded by an uncomplicated AF ablation 19 days prior and a subsequent emergency department attendance within a few days of his procedure, where he had presented with a history of new chest pain and reflux symptoms. Imaging revealed intra-cranial and intra-cardiac air, which was attributed to an uncontrolled atrio-esophageal fistula. Treatment options were limited by the patient's clinical instability and the patient was eventually palliated after developing catastrophic brain injury due to extensive cerebral air emboli. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Patients typically first present to the emergency department with new symptoms of either gastroesophageal reflux or chest pain, therefore, early recognition by emergency physicians is vital. Characteristic symptoms alongside a recent history of a cardiac ablation procedure should prompt additional diagnostic imaging to look for evidence of an atrio-esophageal fistula.

Oesophageal Probe Evaluation in Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation (OPERA): results from a prospective randomized trial

Aims

The aim of the study was to determine the incidence of oesophageal lesions after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) with or without the use of oesophageal temperature probes.

Methods and results

Two hundred patients were prospectively randomized into two groups: the OPERA+ group underwent RFA using oesophageal probes (SensiTherm™); the OPERA− group received RFA using fixed energy levels of 25 W at the posterior wall without an oesophageal probe. All patients underwent post-interventional endoscopy and Holter-electrocardiogram after 6 months. (Clinical.Trials.gov: NCT03246594). One hundred patients were randomized in OPERA+ and 100 patients in OPERA−. The drop-out rate was 10%. In total, 18/180 (10%) patients developed endoscopically diagnosed oesophageal lesions (EDEL). There was no difference between the groups with 10/90 (11%) EDEL in OPERA+ vs. 8/90 (9%) in OPERA− (P = 0.62). Despite the higher power delivered at the posterior wall in OPERA+ [28 ± 4 vs. 25 ± 2 W (P = 0.001)], the average EDEL size was equal [5.7 ± 2.6 vs. 4.5 ± 1.7 mm (P = 0.38)]. The peak temperature did not correlate with EDEL size. During follow-up, no patient died. Only one patient in OPERA− required a specific therapy for treatment of the lesion. Cumulative AF recurrence after 6 (3–13) months was 28/87 (32%) vs. 34/88 (39%), P = 0.541.

Conclusion

This first randomized study demonstrates that intraoesophageal temperature monitoring using the SensiTherm™ probe does not affect the probability of developing EDEL. The peak temperature measured by the thermoprobe seems not to correlate with the incidence of EDEL. Empiric energy reduction at the posterior wall did not affect the efficacy of the procedure.

Surgical and endoscopic management of a pericardioesophageal fistula after radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation

INTRODUCTION

The most feared complication of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an atrioesophageal fistula (AEF). While rare (0.1-0.25%), primary surgical closure (as opposed to esophageal stenting) is associated with lower mortality. Pericardioesophageal fistula (PEF) may present prior to fistulization into the atrium. Unfortunately, data on the optimal management of PEFs are lacking.

CASE REPORT

Seventy-one-year-old male with AF presented with chest pain 3 weeks after radiofrequency PVI. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) chest and echocardiogram showed pneumopericardium. Barium esophagram showed extravasation from esophagus into the pericardium without connection to the left atrium. Sternotomy with mediastinal exploration exposed the pericardial defect, over which a CorMatrix patch was placed. The fistula was then stented endoscopically with endosuture fixation. Poststent esophagram did not show barium leak, and the patient was discharged home. One week later, the patient returned with enterococcal and candida bacteremia and an acute right parietal/occipital lobe infarct. Barium esophagram showed contrast extravasation into the pericardium. The patient rapidly succumbed to his illness and died. Autopsy revealed pericardial abscess posterior to the LA in communication with the esophagus. Extension to the LA was not seen.

CONCLUSION

While the surgical treatment of AEF is relatively well established, there is no consensus in the management of PEF. While prior small series have suggested PEF may be managed with esophageal stenting, our case illustrates the limitations of this approach.

Atrioesophageal fistula post atrial fibrillation ablation: A multicenter study from China

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare but devastating complication with high mortality post atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The purpose of current study was to determine the epidemiology, clinical features, pathogenesis, and management of AEF after AF ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with diagnosed AEF were included and retrospectively analyzed according to the registry of 11 centers in China from January 2010 to December 2019. A total of 16 AEF cases were identified from 44 794 patients who received a left atrial ablation procedure (0.035% per procedure). The interval from procedure to clinical onset of AEF averaged 18.3 days (3-39 days). The fever ranked the most common symptom, occurred in 14 of the 16 cases, followed by neurological deficits (n = 11), chest pain (n = 5), and hematemesis (n = 4). Patients undergoing surgical repair had a better prognosis compared to those receiving nonsurgical management ([4 of 8] 50.0% vs [8 of 8] 100%, P < .05) with an overall mortality rate of 75.0%.

CONCLUSION

AEF is highly characterized by varied manifestations. Early diagnosis and urgent surgical repair are vital to those patients and associated with improved survival rates.

Treatment Complications of Atrial Fibrillation and Their Management

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a rhythm disturbance defined by irregular, rapid electrical, and mechanical activation of the atria, which causes unsynchronized atrial contraction and promotes thromboembolism. AF is the most common sustained arrhythmia. Its prevalence and incidence are increasing due to aging and improved survival from acute heart diseases. This article is a review on AF management from both a surgical and catheter-based perspective. While both treatment approaches to AF have been shown to be successful in the management of AF, they are not without their own inherent complications. This article seeks to review some of these complications and help to guide treatment.

Contemporary Surgical Management of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia which may cause symptoms that significantly impact quality of life and is associated with increased risk of stroke, heart failure, and sudden death. Over the past three decades many surgical techniques as well as catheter-bases procedures have been developed to treat atrial fibrillation. In this review we describe the indications, treatments, outcomes, surgical techniques, and technical advances reported in the literature.

Management of Atrio-esophageal Fistula Induced by Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: a Case Series

Atrio-esophageal fistula (AEF) is one of the most devastating complication of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) and surgical repair is strongly recommended. However, optimal surgical approach remains to be elucidated. We retrospectively reviewed AEF cases that occurred after RFCA in a single center and evaluated the clinical results of different surgical approach. Surgical or endoscopic repair was attempted in five AF patients who underwent RFCA. Atrio-esophageal fistula and mediastinal infection was not controlled in the patient who underwent endoscopic repair eventually died. Lethal cerebral air embolism occurred two days after surgery in a patient who underwent esophageal repair only. Primary surgical repair of both the left atrium (LA) and esophagus was performed in the remaining three patients. Among these three patients, two underwent external LA repair and the remaining had internal LA repair via open-heart surgery. External repair of the LA was unsuccessful and one patient dies and another had to undergo second operation with internal repair of the LA. The patient who underwent internal LA repair during the first operation survived without additional surgery. Furthermore, we applied veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) with artificial induction of ventricular fibrillation in this patient to prevent air and septic embolism and she had no neurologic sequelae. In summary, surgical correction can be considered preferentially to correct AEF. Open-heart surgical repair of LA from the internal side seems to be an acceptable surgical method. Application of VA-ECMO with artificial induction of ventricular fibrillation might be effective to prevent air and septic embolism.

Esophageal injury associated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Determinants of risk and protective strategies

Catheter ablation has become an important element in the management of atrial fibrillation. Several technical advances allowed for better safety profiles and lower recurrence rates, leading to an increasing number of ablations worldwide. Despite that, major complications are still reported, and esophageal thermal injury remains a significant concern as atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) is often fatal. Recognition of the mechanisms involved in the process of esophageal lesion formation and the identification of the main determinants of risk have set the grounds for the development and improvement of different esophageal protective strategies. More sensitive esophageal temperature monitoring, safer ablation parameters and catheters, and different energy sources appear to collectively reduce the risk of esophageal thermal injury. Adjunctive measures such as the prophylactic use of proton-pump inhibitors, as well as esophageal cooling or deviation devices, have emerged as complementary methods with variable but promising results. Nevertheless, as a multifactorial problem, no single esophageal protective measure has proven to be sufficiently effective to eliminate the risk, and further investigation is still warranted. Early screening in the patients at risk and prompt intervention in the cases of AEF are important risk modifiers and yield better outcomes.

Salvage Esophagectomy After Atrioesophageal Repair

Atrioesophageal fistula is a rare but highly morbid complication after endovascular ablation for atrial fibrillation. We report the case of a 63-year-old man with an atrioesophageal fistula after ablation who presented with neurologic symptoms and underwent emergent repair. He subsequently sustained a leak from the esophageal repair requiring emergent esophagectomy with end-esophagostomy. After several months, the patient underwent re-establishment of gastrointestinal continuity via retrosternal gastric conduit reconstruction.

Atrioesophageal Fistula After Radiofrequency Ablation Presenting With Status Epilepticus: A Case Report

Radiofrequency (RF) ablation for atrial fibrillation is commonly performed. Atrioesophageal fistulas are an uncommon complication of RF ablation and can present with status epilepticus due to an extensive vascular air embolus. Initial treatment may require a high level of suspicion of this rare occurrence to help prevent further injury and increase the likelihood of a meaningful recovery.

Acute Stroke After Upper Endoscopy in a Patient With a Suspected Atrioesophageal Fistula

Atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare complication of atrial fibrillation ablation. We present a man with sepsis and frank hematemesis 3 weeks after atrial fibrillation ablation. Thoracic computed tomography showed no definitive evidence of AEF. He underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and subsequently developed an embolic stroke. In the operating room, he was found to have AEF. This case highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for AEF because of its nonspecific presentation and difficulty in diagnosing with imaging or endoscopy. Once AEF is suspected, esophagogastroduodenoscopy should be avoided because of the risk of precipitating embolic events.

Cerebral arterial air emboli after stent insertion in esophageal cancer complicated with esophago-left atrial fistula: An autopsy case and review of the literature

Cerebral arterial air embolism is a rare and unexpected complication of advanced esophageal cancer. The entry of air to systemic circulation is an esophago-left atrial or pulmonary vein fistula formation. Herein, we report an autopsy case of a 64-year-old man. He was diagnosed esophageal cancer 2 years ago and underwent chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy but the disease progressed, unfortunately. Then two metal stents were inserted into the middle thoracic esophagus as a palliation of dysphagia. After initiation of oral intake, he developed deterioration of consciousness. The cranial computed tomography showed cerebral arterial air emboli with multiple low-density areas. He failed to gain consciousness again and died one and half days later. In a literature survey, this autopsy case is the first presentation that confirmed histologically the close association between stent placement and formation of esophago-left atrial fistula. Due to the fatality of cerebral arterial air embolism, clinicians should keep in mind the possibility of this catastrophic complication after multimodality treatment of esophageal cancer.

Lessons of the month 1: Fatal oesophago-pericardial fistula with cerebral air embolism after elective atrial fibrillation ablation

Oesophago-pericardial fistula following any electrophysiological procedure is a rare, and potentially, life-threatening condition. Initial presentation can easily be misdiagnosed, as symptoms vary and are not specific. Echocardiography is an invaluable tool to diagnose and rule out complications. We present the case of a 68-year-old patient who developed an oesophago-pericardial fistula complicated with purulent pericarditis, sepsis and cerebral air embolism. In conclusion, this case report encourages physicians to use strategies that may help with early diagnosis and lead to potential lifesaving interventions.

Transmural unipolar electrogram change occurs within 7 s at the left atrial posterior wall during pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

To assess occurrence of a histologically validated measure of transmural (TM) atrial ablation-pure R unipolar electrogram (UE) morphology change-at first-ablated left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) sites during contact force (CF)-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

METHODS

Objectively annotated VISITAG™ Module and CARTOREPLAY™ (Biosense Webster Inc., Diamond Bar, CA, USA) UE morphology data were retrospectively analyzed in 23 consecutive patients undergoing PVI under general anesthesia.

RESULTS

PVI without spontaneous/dormant recovery was achieved in all, employing 16.3 (3.2) min of radiofrequency (RF; 30 W) energy. All first-ablated LAPW sites demonstrated RS UE morphology preablation, with RF-induced pure R UE morphology change in 98%. Time to pure R UE morphology was significantly shorter at left-sided LAPW sites (4.9 [2.1] vs 6.7 [2.5] s; P = .02), with significantly greater impedance drop (median 13.5 vs 9.9 Ω; P = .003). Importantly, neither first-site RF duration (14.9 vs 15.0 s) nor maximum ablation catheter tip distance moved (during RF) was significantly different, yet the mean CF was significantly higher at right-sided sites (16.5 vs 11.2 g; P = .002). Concurrent impedance and objectively annotated bipolar electrogram (BE) data demonstrated ∼6-8 Ω impedance drop and ∼30% BE decrease at the time of first pure R UE morphology change.

CONCLUSIONS

Using objective ablation site annotation, UE morphology evidence of TM RF effect was demonstrated far sooner than considered biologically possible according to the "conventional" 20-40 s RF per-site approach, with significantly greater ablative effect evident at left-sided sites. This novel methodology represents a scientifically more rigorous foundation toward future research into the biological effects of RF ablation in vivo.

Atrio-oesophageal fistula after the cryomaze procedure

We report a case of an atrio-oesophageal fistula after biatrial cryomaze ablation for atrial fibrillation, a complication that has not yet been described in the literature for the cryomaze method. Our report also serves as a reminder of this rare but lethal complication- that it can occur after any method of ablation for atrial fibrillation and a high index of suspicion for its diagnosis must be maintained to allow for early surgical treatment which offers the best chance of survival.

Surgical repair of an esophageal perforation after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Recent reports have described the incidence of atrioesophageal fistulas (AEF), often resulting in death, from radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF).¹ Cases of esophageal perforation without concomitant AEF have not been described as extensively.¹ The precise mechanisms leading to esophageal injury after catheter ablation without involvement of the left atrium are not fully understood. The surgical approach to treat esophageal perforation is strongly recommended.² However, a unified surgical treatment approach has not yet been established. We describe a case of successful surgical repair of an esophageal perforation after ablation using surgical repair in combination with an omental wrap.

Retrospective review of 65 atrioesophageal fistulas post atrial fibrillation ablation

Background

Although a rare complication of catheter based ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) is a serious and fatal event [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]]. Most reports of AEF are single cases or small case series.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to perform a comprehensive literature search of all published atrioesophageal fistula following catheter ablation for AF in order to identify the mortality rates associated with therapeutic modalities and suggest the most definitive management in reducing mortality.

Methods

A comprehensive literature review of reported observational cases of atrioesophageal fistula post catheter based ablation for atrial fibrillation was performed.

Results

Sixty-five cases of AEF post atrial fibrillation ablation were reviewed. The mean age was 55 years old. 73.8% (48/65) of the identified cases occurred in males (p < 0.001). Of the 65 cases, 13 underwent surgical radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and 52 underwent percutaneous RFA. Mortality resulted in 53.8% of those who underwent surgical RFA and in 55.8% of those who underwent percutaneous RFA (p = .888). The time range interval from procedure to onset of symptoms was 1–60 days. The most prevalent symptom, fever, occurred in 52 of the 65 cases, followed by neurological symptoms (n = 44). CT of the chest (n = 37), transthoracic echocardiogram (n = 21), and CT of the head (n = 18) were the preferred diagnostic modalities. Patients who underwent surgical correction with esophageal repair for treatment were more likely to survive, in comparison to patients who were treated with non-surgical interventions, such as antibiotic therapy, anticoagulation therapy or esophageal stenting. Of the total 34 patients who were treated surgically, 27 survived (79.4%). Of the total 31 patients who were treated non-surgically, only 2 survived (6.5%), reflecting significantly lower mortality with surgical versus non-surgical therapy (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Atrioesophageal fistula is an uncommon but potentially fatal complication of atrial fibrillation ablation. Patients who underwent surgical repair were twelve times more likely to survive than those treated with stenting, antibiotic therapy or no intervention. Based on the observation that patients are 12 times more likely to survive an AEF with surgery than without, the authors believe that prompt surgical correction of AEF should be considered as standard of care when dealing with this dreaded complication.

How to Prevent, Detect and Manage Complications Caused by Cryoballoon Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and the prevalence is increasing every year. Patients who fail to maintain sinus rhythm with use of anti-arrhythmic drug therapy are referred for catheter ablation. Cryoballoon (CB) ablation has emerged as an effective and alternative treatment option to traditional point-by-point radiofrequency ablation, but there can be complications. This article reviews the incidence, presentation, risk factors, management and preventative strategies of three major complications associated with CB ablation: phrenic nerve injury, atrial oesophageal fistula and bronchial injury. Although these complications are rare, electrophysiologists should institute measures to identify high-risk patients, implement best-practice techniques to minimise risks and maintain a high index of suspicion to recognise the complications quickly and implement correct treatment strategies.

Atrioesophageal Fistula After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A single center series

Background

The incidence of atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation is reported to be 0.015%-0.04%, though it is likely underreported due to a number of factors including misdiagnosis. We report our institutional experience with AEF.

Methods

Patients with confirmed diagnosis of AEF between 2004 and 2016 at our institution were identified (n=5) and their clinical characteristics and outcome were analyzed.

Results

AEF occurred in 5 patients who underwent AF catheter ablation (3 ablated at our institution; 2 transferred from outside hospitals after diagnosis of AEF). Symptoms were chest pain (n=3), fever (n=3), TIA/stroke (n=3), dysphagia (n=1), and headache (n=1). Chest pain was the earliest symptom and occurred 21-24 days post-RFA. One patient had sudden death without preceding symptoms. Findings included leukocytosis (WBC count range of 17200-19,000) and sepsis. Chest CT was obtained in 3 patients and showed air in the left atrium or mediastinum. Three patients had evidence of multifocal stroke on MRI. Three patients died before surgery could be performed. Two patients (40%) underwent emergent surgery which included partial excision of atrial wall, closure with bovine pericardial patch and closure of esophageal lesion. Surgical outcomes were favorable (100% survival).

Conclusion

Chest pain and fever were the early symptoms of AEF and occurred before the neurologic complications. Chest CT was an excellent tool for detection of AEF. All patients who were diagnosed correctly and underwent surgery survived. Early detection is imperative as prompt surgery may improve survival. Health-care community education is the key to ensure early detection and transfer to a qualified surgical center.

Incidence of asymptomatic oesophageal lesions after atrial fibrillation ablation using an oesophageal temperature probe with insulated thermocouples: a comparative controlled study

Aims

Oesophageal probes to monitor luminal oesophageal temperature (LET) during atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation have been proposed, but their effects remain unclear. Aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of an oesophageal temperature probe with insulated thermocouples.

Methods and results

Patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory paroxysmal or persistent AF who underwent left atrial radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation were prospectively enrolled. Patients were ablated using a single-tip RF contact force ablation catheter. An intraluminal oesophageal temperature probe was used in Group 1. In Group 2, patients were ablated without LET monitoring. Assessment of asymptomatic endoscopically detected oesophageal lesions (EDEL) was performed by oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in all patients. Eighty patients (mean age 63.7 ± 10.7 years; men 56%) with symptomatic, drug-refractory paroxysmal (n = 28; 35%) or persistent AF were included. Group 1 and Group 2 patients (n = 40 in each group) were comparable in regard to baseline characteristics, but RF duration on the posterior wall was significantly shorter in Group 1 patients. Overall, seven patients (8.8%) developed EDEL (four ulcerations, three erythema). The incidence of EDEL in Group 1 and Group 2 patients was comparable (7.5 vs. 10%, P = 1.0). No major adverse events were reported in both groups.

Conclusion

According to these preliminary results, the use of oesophageal temperature probes with insulated thermocouples seems to be feasible in patients undergoing AF RF catheter ablation. The incidence of post-procedural EDEL when using a cut-off of 39°C is comparable to the incidence of EDEL without using a temperature probe.

Atrial-oesophageal fistula following percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the risk still persists

Aims

Atrial-oesophageal fistula is a serious complication related to ablation of atrial fibrillation. As its occurrence is rare, there is a great lack of information about their mechanisms, incidence, presentations, and treatment. The objective of this manuscript is to present a series of cases of atrial-oesophageal fistula in Brazil, focusing on incidence, clinical presentation, and follow-up.

Methods and results

This is a retrospective multicentre registry of atrial-oesophageal fistula cases that occurred in eight Brazilian centres from 2003 to 2015. Ten cases (0.113%) of atrial-oesophageal fistula were reported in 8863 ablation procedures in the period. Most of the subjects were male (70%) with age 59.6 ± 9.3 years. Eight centres were reference units in atrial fibrillation ablation with an experience over than 200 procedures at the time of fistula occurrence. Oesophageal temperature monitoring was performed in eight cases using coated sensors in six. The first atrial-oesophageal fistula clinical manifestation was typically fever (in six patients), with a median onset time of 16.5 (12–43) days after ablation. There was a delay of 7.8 ± 3.3 days between the first manifestation and the diagnosis in five patients. The treatment was surgical in six cases, clinical in three and stenting in one. Seven patients died (70%) and two developed permanent neurological sequelae.

Conclusion

Atrial-oesophageal fistula remains a serious complication following AF ablation despite the incorporation of protective measures and increased technical experience of the groups. The high morbidity and mortality despite the treatment indicates the need to develop adequate preventive strategies.