Combined Actions of Ivabradine and Ranolazine Reduce Ventricular Rate During Atrial Fibrillation

A pilot study evaluating the role of ivabradine for rate control in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

Ivabradine may have a role in rate control of atrial fibrillation (AF) due to effects on HCN channels in AV node. We studied role of Ivabradine in rate control of rheumatic AF.

METHODS

80 patients, rheumatic AF, HR > 100 bpm (age 47 ± 11 yrs, AF duration 6.8 ± 2.9 years, rate 131 ± 16 bpm) on maximally tolerated ββ or CCB's, randomized to Ivabradine or escalated ββ/CCB. Ivabradine started @ 2.5 mg BD; increased to 5 mg BD if inadequate response at 1 week (failure to decrease HR < 10% vs baseline). After Holter at 1 month, dose escalated to 7.5 mg BD if needed.

RESULTS

Ivabradine resulted in significantly lower HR (81 ± 10 vs 99 ± 9) at 3 months and 6 months (79 ± 8 vs 94 ± 8, p < 0.001). Absolute reduction in HR: 56 ± 15 vs 31 ± 14 bpm and % change in HR: 41 ± 7 vs 24 ± 9%, both p < 0.00001). At 6 months, Ivabradine group had. 1Significantly lower NT Pro BNP (1168 vs 1314 pg/ml), higher 6 min walk distance (410 ± 47 vs 349 ± 54 m, all p < 0.001) 2Better symptom class (EHRA score 1: asymptomatic 84% vs 40%), improvement >1 EHRA class; baseline 60% vs 17% 3Better LA Strain (22.8 ± 2.8% vs 20.6 ± 2.5%) Ivabradine was well tolerated and there was no drug withdrawal.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that Ivabradine can be an option for rate control in rheumatic AF.

Ivabradine for controlling heart rate in permanent atrial fibrillation: A translational clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological options for rate control in atrial fibrillation are scarce. Ivabradine was postulated to reduce the ventricular rate in this setting.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the mechanism of inhibition of atrioventricular conduction produced by ivabradine and to determine its efficacy and safety in atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

The effects of ivabradine on atrioventricular node and ventricular cells were studied by in vitro whole-cell patch-clamp experiments and mathematical simulation of human action potentials. In parallel, a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III clinical trial compared ivabradine with digoxin for uncontrolled permanent atrial fibrillation despite β-blocker or calcium channel blocker treatment.

RESULTS

Ivabradine 1 μM inhibited "funny" current and rapidly activating delayed rectifier potassium channel current by 28.9% and 22.8%, respectively (P < .05). The sodium channel current and L-type calcium channel current were reduced only at 10 μM. Ivabradine slowed the firing frequency of a modeled human atrioventricular node action potential by 10.6% and induced a minimal prolongation of ventricular action potential. Thirty-five (51.5%) patients were randomized to ivabradine and 33 (49.5%) to digoxin. The mean daytime heart rate decreased by 11.6 beats/min (-11.5%) in the ivabradine arm (P = .02) vs 19.6 (-20.6%) in the digoxin arm (P < .001), although the noninferiority margin of efficacy was not met (Z = -1.95; P = .97). The primary safety end point occurred in 3 patients (8.6%) on ivabradine and in 8 (24.2%) on digoxin (P = .10).

CONCLUSION

Ivabradine produced a moderate rate reduction in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. The inhibition of funny current in the atrioventricular node seems to be the main mechanism responsible for this reduction. Compared with digoxin, ivabradine was less effective, was better tolerated, and had a similar rate of serious adverse events.

Ivabradine in the treatment of non-paroxysmal junctional tachycardia with interference atrioventricular dissociation: A case report

Ivabradine reduces the heart rate by selectively inhibiting the I_f current of the sinoatrial node, mainly for the treatment of chronic heart failure with decreased left ventricular systolic function and inappropriate sinus tachycardia, but the inhibitory effect on the atrioventricular node is rarely reported. The patient was admitted to hospital mainly because of intermittent chest pain for 7 years, which worsened for 10 days. Admission electrocardiogram (ECG) considered sinus tachycardia, with QS wave and T wave inversion in II, III, aVF, V₃ R-V₅ R, V₄ -V₉ leads, and non-paroxysmal junctional tachycardia (NPJT) with interference atrioventricular dissociation. After treatment with ivabradine the ECG returned to normal conduction sequence. NPJT with interference atrioventricular dissociation is a fairly rare electrocardiographic phenomenon. This case reports for the first time that ivabradine is used in the treatment of NPJT with interference atrioventricular dissociation. It is speculated that ivabradine has a potential inhibitory effect on the atrioventricular node.

The Bradycardic Agent Ivabradine Acts as an Atypical Inhibitor of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels

Background and purpose: Ivabradine is clinically administered to lower the heart rate, proposedly by inhibiting hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channels in the sinoatrial node. Recent evidence suggests that voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSC) are inhibited within the same concentration range. VGSCs are expressed within the sinoatrial node and throughout the conduction system of the heart. A block of these channels thus likely contributes to the established and newly raised clinical indications of ivabradine. We, therefore, investigated the pharmacological action of ivabradine on VGSCs in sufficient detail in order to gain a better understanding of the pro- and anti-arrhythmic effects associated with the administration of this drug.

Experimental Approach: Ivabradine was tested on VGSCs in native cardiomyocytes isolated from mouse ventricles and the His-Purkinje system and on human Na_v1.5 in a heterologous expression system. We investigated the mechanism of channel inhibition by determining its voltage-, frequency-, state-, and temperature-dependence, complemented by a molecular drug docking to the recent Na_v1.5 cryoEM structure. Automated patch-clamp experiments were used to investigate ivabradine-mediated changes in Na_v1.5 inactivation parameters and inhibition of different VGSC isoforms.

Key results: Ivabradine inhibited VGSCs in a voltage- and frequency-dependent manner, but did not alter voltage-dependence of activation and fast inactivation, nor recovery from fast inactivation. Cardiac (Na_v1.5), neuronal (Na_v1.2), and skeletal muscle (Na_v1.4) VGSC isoforms were inhibited by ivabradine within the same concentration range, as were sodium currents in native cardiomyocytes isolated from the ventricles and the His-Purkinje system. Molecular drug docking suggested an interaction of ivabradine with the classical local anesthetic binding site.

Conclusion and Implications: Ivabradine acts as an atypical inhibitor of VGSCs. Inhibition of VGSCs likely contributes to the heart rate lowering effect of ivabradine, in particular at higher stimulation frequencies and depolarized membrane potentials, and to the observed slowing of intra-cardiac conduction. Inhibition of VGSCs in native cardiomyocytes and across channel isoforms may provide a potential basis for the anti-arrhythmic potential as observed upon administration of ivabradine.

Review: HCN Channels in the Heart

Pacemaker cells are the basis of rhythm in the heart. Cardiovascular diseases, and in particular, arrhythmias are a leading cause of hospital admissions and have been implicated as a cause of sudden death. The prevalence of people with arrhythmias will increase in the next years due to an increase in the ageing population and risk factors. The current therapies are limited, have a lot of side effects, and thus, are not ideal. Pacemaker channels, also called hyperpolarizationactivated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels, are the molecular correlate of the hyperpolarization- activated current, called Ih (from hyperpolarization) or If (from funny), that contribute crucially to the pacemaker activity in cardiac nodal cells and impulse generation and transmission in neurons. HCN channels have emerged as interesting targets for the development of drugs, in particular, to lower the heart rate. Nonetheless, their pharmacology is still rather poorly explored in comparison to many other voltage-gated ion channels or ligand-gated ion channels. Ivabradine is the first and currently the only clinically approved compound that specifically targets HCN channels. The therapeutic indication of ivabradine is the symptomatic treatment of chronic stable angina pectoris in patients with coronary artery disease with a normal sinus rhythm. Several other pharmacological agents have been shown to exert an effect on heart rate, although this effect is not always desired. This review is focused on the pacemaking process taking place in the heart and summarizes the current knowledge on HCN channels.

Ivabradine and Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

ABSTRACT

This was a meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effect of ivabradine on the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) as well as its effect on the ventricular rate in patients with AF. The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and other databases were searched for RCTs of ivabradine. Thirteen trials with 37,533 patients met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of AF was significantly higher in the ivabradine treatment group than in the control group (odds ratio (OR), 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-1.41), although it was reduced after cardiac surgery (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.23-2.12). Regarding left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), ivabradine increased the risk of AF in both LVEF >40% (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.24 to 1.63) and LVEF ≤40% subgroups (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.98-1.37). The risk of AF was increased by both small and large cumulative doses of ivabradine (small cumulative dose: OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 0.48 to 18.93; large cumulative dose: OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83-1.34). Furthermore, ivabradine may reduce the ventricular rate in patients with AF. In conclusion, we found that both large and small cumulative doses of ivabradine were associated with an increased incidence of AF, and the effect was more marked in the LVEF >40% subgroup. Nevertheless, ivabradine therapy is beneficial for the prevention of post-operative AF. Furthermore, ivabradine may be effective in controlling the ventricular rate in patients with AF, although more RCTs are needed to support this conclusion.

Ranolazine: An Old Drug with Emerging Potential; Lessons from Pre-Clinical and Clinical Investigations for Possible Repositioning

Ischemic heart disease is a significant public health problem with high mortality and morbidity. Extensive scientific investigations from basic sciences to clinics revealed multilevel alterations from metabolic imbalance, altered electrophysiology, and defective Ca²⁺/Na⁺ homeostasis leading to lethal arrhythmias. Despite the recent identification of numerous molecular targets with potential therapeutic interest, a pragmatic observation on the current pharmacological R&D output confirms the lack of new therapeutic offers to patients. By contrast, from recent trials, molecules initially developed for other fields of application have shown cardiovascular benefits, as illustrated with some anti-diabetic agents, regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes, emphasizing the clear advantage of “old” drug repositioning. Ranolazine is approved as an antianginal agent and has a favorable overall safety profile. This drug, developed initially as a metabolic modulator, was also identified as an inhibitor of the cardiac late Na⁺ current, although it also blocks other ionic currents, including the hERG/Ikr K⁺ current. The latter actions have been involved in this drug’s antiarrhythmic effects, both on supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias (VA). However, despite initial enthusiasm and promising development in the cardiovascular field, ranolazine is only authorized as a second-line treatment in patients with chronic angina pectoris, notwithstanding its antiarrhythmic properties. A plausible reason for this is the apparent difficulty in linking the clinical benefits to the multiple molecular actions of this drug. Here, we review ranolazine’s experimental and clinical knowledge on cardiac metabolism and arrhythmias. We also highlight advances in understanding novel effects on neurons, the vascular system, skeletal muscles, blood sugar control, and cancer, which may open the way to reposition this “old” drug alone or in combination with other medications.

Anti-arrhythmic investigations in large animal models of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) constitutes an increasing health problem in the aging population. Animal models reflecting human phenotypes are needed to understand the mechanisms of AF, as well as to test new pharmacological interventions. In recent years, a number of large animal models, primarily pigs, goats, dog and horses have been used in AF research. These animals can to a certain extent recapitulate the human pathophysiological characteristics and serve as valuable tools in investigating new pharmacological interventions for treating AF. This review focuses on anti-arrhythmic investigations in large animals. Initially, spontaneous AF in small and large mammals is discussed. This is followed by a short presentation of frequently used methods for inducing short- and long-term AF. The major focus of the review is on anti-arrhythmic compounds either frequently used in the human clinic (ranolazine, flecainide, vernakalant and amiodarone) or being promising new AF medicine candidates (I_K,Ach , I_SK,Ca and I_K2P blockers).

The bradycardic agent ivabradine decreases conduction velocity in the AV node and in the ventricles in-vivo

Ivabradine blocks hyperpolarisation-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels, thereby lowering the heart rate, an action that is used clinically for the treatment of heart failure and angina pectoris. We and others have shown previously that ivabradine, in addition to its HCN channel blocking activity, also inhibits voltage-gated Na channels in vitro at concentrations that may be clinically relevant. Such action may reduce conduction velocity in cardiac atria and ventricles. Here, we explore the effect of administration of ivabradine on parameters of ventricular conduction and repolarization in the surface ECG of anesthetized mice. We found that 5 min after i.p. administration of 10 mg/kg ivabradine spontaneous heart rate had declined by ~13%, which is within the range observed in human clinical studies. At the same time a significant increase in QRS duration by ~18% was observed, suggesting a reduction in ventricular conduction velocity. During transesophageal pacing at heart rates between 100 and 220 beats/min there was no obvious rate-dependence of ivabradine-induced QRS prolongation. On the other hand, ivabradine produced substantial rate-dependent slowing of AV nodal conduction. We conclude that ivabradine prolongs conduction in the AV-node and in the ventricles in vivo.

Pharmacological management of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: review of current knowledge and future directions

Introduction: Both heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) independently cause significant morbidity and mortality. The two conditions commonly coexist and AF in the setting of HFrEF is associated with worse mortality, hospitalizations, and quality of life compared to HFrEF without AF. Despite the large burden of these conditions, there is no clear optimal management strategy for when they occur together.Areas covered: This review focuses on the pharmacological management of AF in HFrEF. Studies were identified through PubMed search of relevant keywords. The authors review key clinical trials that have influenced management strategies and guidelines. The authors focus on the classes of drugs used to treat AF for both rate and rhythm control strategies including beta-blockers, digoxin, amiodarone, and dofetilide. Additionally, the authors discuss select non-antiarrhythmic medications that affect AF in HFrEF. The authors highlight the strengths and weakness of the data supporting the use of these medications and suggest future directions.Expert opinion: The pharmacological treatment of AF in HFrEF will need further refinement alongside the emerging role of catheter ablation. Novel HF medications and antiarrhythmics offer new tools to prevent the development of AF, as well as for rate and rhythm control strategies.

Ivabradine Aggravates the Proarrhythmic Risk in Experimental Models of Long QT Syndrome

Ivabradine has recently been demonstrated to have antiarrhythmic properties in atrial fibrillation. The aim of the present study was to assess the electrophysiologic profile of ivabradine in an experimental whole-heart model of long-QT-syndrome. In 12 isolated rabbit hearts long-QT-2-syndrome (LQT2) was simulated by infusion of D,L-sotalol (100 µM). 12 rabbit hearts were treated with veratridine (0.5 µM) to mimic long-QT-3-syndrome (LQT3). Sotalol induced a significant prolongation of QT-interval (+ 40 ms, p < 0.01) and action potential duration (APD, + 20 ms, p < 0.01). Similar results were obtained in veratridine-treated hearts (QT-interval: +52 ms, p < 0.01; APD: + 41 ms, p < 0.01). Of note, both sotalol (+ 26 ms, p < 0.01) and veratridine (+ 42 ms, p < 0.01) significantly increased spatial dispersion of repolarisation. Additional infusion of ivabradine (5 µM) did not change these parameters in sotalol-pretreated hearts but resulted in a further significant increase of QT-interval (+ 26 ms, p < 0.05) and APD (+ 49 ms, p < 0.05) in veratridine-treated hearts. Lowering of potassium concentration in bradycardic AV-blocked hearts resulted in the occurrence of early afterdepolarizations (EAD) or polymorphic ventricular tachycardias (VT) resembling torsade de pointes in 6 of 12 sotalol-treated hearts (56 episodes) and 6 of 12 veratridine-treated hearts (73 episodes). Additional infusion of ivabradine increased occurrence of polymorphic VT. Ivabradine treatment resulted in occurrence of EAD and polymorphic VT in 9 of 12 sotalol-treated hearts (212 episodes), and 8 of 12 veratridine-treated hearts (155 episodes). Treatment with ivabradine in experimental models of LQT2 and LQT3 increases proarrhythmia. A distinct interaction with potassium currents most likely represents a major underlying mechanism. These results imply that ivabradine should be employed with caution in the presence of QT-prolongation.

Drug Testing in Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes From a Patient With Short QT Syndrome Type 1

Short QT syndrome (SQTS) predisposes afflicted patients to sudden cardiac death. Until now, only one drug-quinidine-has been shown to be effective in patients with SQTS type 1(SQTS1). The objective of this study was to use human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) from a patient with SQTS1 to search for potentially effective drugs for the treatment of SQTS1 patients. Patch clamp and single-cell contraction measurements were employed to assess drug effects. Ivabradine, mexiletine, and ajmaline but not flecainide, ranolazine, or amiodarone prolonged the action potential duration (APD) in hiPSC-CMs from an SQTS1 patient. Ivabradine, ajmaline, and mexiletine inhibited KCNH2 channel currents significantly, which may underlie their APD-prolonging effects. Under proarrhythmic epinephrine stimulation in spontaneously beating SQTS1 hiPSC-CMs, ivabradine, mexiletine, and ajmaline but not flecainide reduced the epinephrine-induced arrhythmic events. The results demonstrate that ivabradine, ajmaline, and mexiletine may be candidate drugs for preventing tachyarrhythmias in SQTS1 patients.

Ranolazine: Multifaceted Role beyond Coronary Artery Disease, a Recent Perspective

Ranolazine is a piperazine derivative approved as an antianginal. Primarily used as a second-line antianginal in stable coronary artery disease. Ranolazine blocks the late Na + current and prevents the rise of cytosolic calcium. It decreases myocardial wall tension and improves coronary blood flow. Ranolazine is effective in atrial fibrillation (AF) as an adjunct to electrical or pharmacological cardioversion. It can be used in combination with amiodarone or dronedarone. It has also been used in AF arising after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Role of ranolazine is also being evaluated in pulmonary arterial hypertension, diastolic dysfunction, and chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. Ranolazine has some anti-glycemic effect and has shown a reduction of hemoglobin A1c in multiple trials. The antianginal effect of ranolazine has also been seen to be more in patients with diabetes compared to those without diabetes. Ranolazine is being evaluated in patients with the peripheral arterial disease with intermittent claudication and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Pilot studies have shown that ranolazine may be beneficial in neurological conditions with myotonia. The evidence-base on the use of ranolazine in various conditions is rapidly increasing with results of further trials eagerly awaited. Accumulating evidence may see ranolazine in routine clinical use for many conditions beyond its traditional role as an antianginal.

Ivabradine in acute heart failure: Effects on heart rate and hemodynamic parameters in a randomized and controlled swine trial

BACKGROUND

Acute heart failure patients could benefit from heart rate reduction, as myocardial consumption and oxidative stress are related to tachycardia. Ivabradine could have a clinical role attenuating catecholamine-induced tachycardia. The aim of this study was to evaluate hemodynamic effects of ivabradine in a swine model of acute heart failure.

METHODS

Myocardial infarction was induced by 45 min left anterior descending artery balloon occlusion in 18 anesthetized pigs. An infusion of dobutamine and noradrenaline was maintained aiming to preserve adequate hemodynamic support, accompanied by fluid administration to obtain a pulmonary wedged pressure ≥ 18 mmHg. After reperfusion, rhythm and hemodynamic stabilization, the animals were randomized to 0.3 mg/kg ivabradine intravenously (n = 9) or placebo (n = 9). Hemodynamic parameters were observed over a 60 min period.

RESULTS

Ivabradine was associated with a significant reduction in heart rate (88.4 ± 12.0 bpm vs. 122.7 ± 17.3 bpm after 15 min of ivabradine/placebo infusion, p < 0.01) and an increase in stroke volume (68.8 ± 13.7 mL vs. 52.4 ± 11.5 mL after 15 min, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in systemic or pulmonary arterial pressure, or significant changes in pulmonary capillary pressure. However, after 15 min, cardiac output was significantly reduced with ivabradine (-5.2% vs. +15.0% variation in ivabradine/placebo group, p = 0.03), and central venous pressure increased (+4.2% vs. -19.7% variation, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Ivabradine reduces heart rate and increases stroke volume without modifying systemic or left filling pressures in a swine model of acute heart failure. However, an excessive heart rate reduction could lead to a decrease in cardiac output and an increase in right filling pressures. Future studies with specific heart rate targets are needed.

Structural and functional remodeling of the atrioventricular node with aging in rats: The role of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated and ryanodine 2 channels

BACKGROUND

Aging is associated with an increased incidence of atrioventricular nodal (AVN) dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the structural and functional remodeling in the atrioventricular junction (AVJ) with aging.

METHODS

Electrophysiology, histology, and immunohistochemistry experiments on male Wistar Hannover rats aged 3 months (n = 24) and 2 years (n = 15) were performed. Atrio-His (AH) interval, Wenkebach cycle length (WBCL), and AVN effective refractory period (AVNERP) were measured. Cesium (2 mM) was used to block hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels, while ryanodine (2 μM) was used to block ryanodine 2 (RyR2) channels. Protein expression from different regions of the AVJ was studied using immunofluorescence. The expression of connexins (connexin 43 and connexin 40), ion channels (Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 4 (HCN4), voltage sensitive sodium channel (Nav1.5), and L-Type calcium channel (Cav1.3)), and calcium handling proteins (RyR2 and sarco/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPaset type 2a (SERCA2a)) were measured. Morphological characteristics were studied with histology.

RESULTS

Without drugs to block HCN and RyR2 channels, there was prolongation of the AH interval, WBCL, and AVNERP (P < .05) with aging. In young rats only, cesium prolonged the AH interval, WBCL, and AVNERP (P < .01). Ryanodine prolonged the AH interval and WBCL (P < .01) in both young and old rats. Immunofluorescence revealed that with aging, connexin 43, HCN4, Nav1.5, and RyR2 downregulate in the regions of the AVJ and connexin 40, SERCA2a, and Cav1.3 upregulate (P < .05). Aging results in cellular hypertrophy, loosely packed cells, a decrease in the number of nuclei, and an increase in collagen content.

CONCLUSION

Heterogeneous ion channel expression changes were observed in the AVJ with aging. For the first time, we have shown that HCN and RyR2 play an important role in AVN dysfunction with aging.

The Hyperpolarization-Activated Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channels: from Biophysics to Pharmacology of a Unique Family of Ion Channels

Hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels are important members of the voltage-gated pore loop channels family. They show unique features: they open at hyperpolarizing potential, carry a mixed Na/K current, and are regulated by cyclic nucleotides. Four different isoforms have been cloned (HCN1-4) that can assemble to form homo- or heterotetramers, characterized by different biophysical properties. These proteins are widely distributed throughout the body and involved in different physiologic processes, the most important being the generation of spontaneous electrical activity in the heart and the regulation of synaptic transmission in the brain. Their role in heart rate, neuronal pacemaking, dendritic integration, learning and memory, and visual and pain perceptions has been extensively studied; these channels have been found also in some peripheral tissues, where their functions still need to be fully elucidated. Genetic defects and altered expression of HCN channels are linked to several pathologies, which makes these proteins attractive targets for translational research; at the moment only one drug (ivabradine), which specifically blocks the hyperpolarization-activated current, is clinically available. This review discusses current knowledge about HCN channels, starting from their biophysical properties, origin, and developmental features, to (patho)physiologic role in different tissues and pharmacological modulation, ending with their present and future relevance as drug targets.

Ivabradine Reduces Digitalis-induced Ventricular Arrhythmias

The I_(f) channel inhibitor ivabradine is recommended for treatment of heart failure but also affects potassium currents and thereby prolongs ventricular repolarization. The aim of this study was to examine the electrophysiological effects of ivabradine on digitalis-induced ventricular arrhythmias. Thirteen rabbit hearts were isolated and Langendorff-perfused. After obtaining baseline data, the digitalis glycoside ouabain was infused (0.2 μM). Monophasic action potentials and ECG showed a significant abbreviation of QT interval (-34 ms, p < 0.05) and action potential duration (APD₉₀ ; -27 ms, p < 0.05). The shortening of ventricular repolarization was accompanied by a reduction in effective refractory period (ERP; -27 ms, p < 0.05). Thereafter, hearts were additionally treated with ivabradine (5 μM). Of note, this did not exert significant effects on QT interval (-4 ms, p = ns) or APD₉₀ (-15 ms, p = ns) but resulted in an increase in ERP (+17 ms, p < 0.05). This led to a significant increase in post-repolarization refractoriness (PRR, +32 ms, p < 0.01) as compared with sole ouabain treatment. Under baseline conditions, ventricular fibrillation (VF) was inducible by a standardized pacing protocol including programmed stimulation and burst stimulation in four of 13 hearts (31%; 15 episodes). After application of 0.2 μM ouabain, eight of 13 hearts were inducible (62%, 49 episodes). Additional infusion of 5 μM ivabradine led to a significant suppression of VF. Only four episodes could be induced in two of 13 hearts (15%). In this study, ivabradine reduced digitalis-induced ventricular arrhythmias. Ivabradine did not affect ventricular repolarization in the presence of digitalis treatment but demonstrated potent anti-arrhythmic properties based on an increase in both ERP and PRR. The study further characterizes the beneficial electrophysiological profile of ivabradine.

Emerging role of ivabradine for rate control in atrial fibrillation

Control of ventricular rate is recommended for patients with paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). Existing rate-control options, including beta-blockers, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and digoxin, are limited by adverse hemodynamic effects and their ability to attain target heart rate (HR). Ivabradine, a novel HR-controlling agent, decreases HR through deceleration of conduction through I_f ('funny') channels, and is approved for HR reduction in heart failure patients with ejection fraction less than 35% and elevated HR, despite optimal pharmacological treatment. Because I_f channels were thought to be expressed solely in sinoatrial (SA) nodal tissue, ivabradine was not investigated in heart failure patients with concomitant AF. Subsequent identification of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channel 4 (HCN4), the primary gene responsible for I_f current expression throughout the myocardium, stimulated interest in the potential role of ivabradine for ventricular rate control in AF. Preclinical studies of ivabradine in animal models with induced AF demonstrated a reduction in HR, with no significant worsening of QT interval or mean arterial pressure. Preliminary human data suggest that ivabradine provides HR reduction without associated hemodynamic complications in patients with AF. Questions remain regarding efficacy, safety, optimal dosing, and length of therapy in these patients. Prospective, randomized studies are needed to determine if ivabradine has a role as a rate-control treatment in patients with AF.

HCN Channels Modulators: The Need for Selectivity

Hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels, the molecular correlate of the hyperpolarization-activated current (If/Ih), are membrane proteins which play an important role in several physiological processes and various pathological conditions. In the Sino Atrial Node (SAN) HCN4 is the target of ivabradine, a bradycardic agent that is, at the moment, the only drug which specifically blocks If. Nevertheless, several other pharmacological agents have been shown to modulate HCN channels, a property that may contribute to their therapeutic activity and/or to their side effects. HCN channels are considered potential targets for developing drugs to treat several important pathologies, but a major issue in this field is the discovery of isoform-selective compounds, owing to the wide distribution of these proteins into the central and peripheral nervous systems, heart and other peripheral tissues. This survey is focused on the compounds that have been shown, or have been designed, to interact with HCN channels and on their binding sites, with the aim to summarize current knowledge and possibly to unveil useful information to design new potent and selective modulators.

The use of ranolazine in non-anginal cardiovascular disorders: A review of current data and ongoing randomized clinical trials

Ranolazine has characteristic properties of a selective inhibitor of the inward sodium current. It is primarily indicated as an anti-anginal agent in patients with coronary artery disease and chronic stable angina. Recently, ranolazine has been noted to possibly impart beneficial effects in various other cardiac conditions, including new-onset, paroxysmal, and chronic atrial fibrillation, post-operative atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias, post-revascularization coronary artery disease, chemotherapeutic cardiotoxicity, and diastolic and microvascular dysfunction. Herein, we present a review of the current clinical evidence describing the adjunctive or synergistic effects of ranolazine in non-angina related cardiovascular disorders, and include a discussion of the ongoing randomized trials investigating the therapeutic potential of ranolazine in a variety of cardiovascular diseases.