1
|
Al-Khatib SM, Singh JP, Ghanbari H, McManus DD, Deering TF, Avari Silva JN, Mittal S, Krahn A, Hurwitz JL. The potential of artificial intelligence to revolutionize health care delivery, research, and education in cardiac electrophysiology. Heart Rhythm 2024; 21:978-989. [PMID: 38752904 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.04.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
The field of electrophysiology (EP) has benefited from numerous seminal innovations and discoveries that have enabled clinicians to deliver therapies and interventions that save lives and promote quality of life. The rapid pace of innovation in EP may be hindered by several challenges including the aging population with increasing morbidity, the availability of multiple costly therapies that, in many instances, confer minor incremental benefit, the limitations of healthcare reimbursement, the lack of response to therapies by some patients, and the complications of the invasive procedures performed. To overcome these challenges and continue on a steadfast path of transformative innovation, the EP community must comprehensively explore how artificial intelligence (AI) can be applied to healthcare delivery, research, and education and consider all opportunities in which AI can catalyze innovation; create workflow, research, and education efficiencies; and improve patient outcomes at a lower cost. In this white paper, we define AI and discuss the potential of AI to revolutionize the EP field. We also address the requirements for implementing, maintaining, and enhancing quality when using AI and consider ethical, operational, and regulatory aspects of AI implementation. This manuscript will be followed by several perspective papers that will expand on some of these topics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sana M Al-Khatib
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Jagmeet P Singh
- Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hamid Ghanbari
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - David D McManus
- Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School and UMass Memorial Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Thomas F Deering
- Piedmont Heart of Buckhead Electrophysiology, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jennifer N Avari Silva
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Andrew Krahn
- Division of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bourazana A, Xanthopoulos A, Briasoulis A, Magouliotis D, Spiliopoulos K, Athanasiou T, Vassilopoulos G, Skoularigis J, Triposkiadis F. Artificial Intelligence in Heart Failure: Friend or Foe? Life (Basel) 2024; 14:145. [PMID: 38276274 PMCID: PMC10817517 DOI: 10.3390/life14010145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
In recent times, there have been notable changes in cardiovascular medicine, propelled by the swift advancements in artificial intelligence (AI). The present work provides an overview of the current applications and challenges of AI in the field of heart failure. It emphasizes the "garbage in, garbage out" issue, where AI systems can produce inaccurate results with skewed data. The discussion covers issues in heart failure diagnostic algorithms, particularly discrepancies between existing models. Concerns about the reliance on the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) for classification and treatment are highlighted, showcasing differences in current scientific perceptions. This review also delves into challenges in implementing AI, including variable considerations and biases in training data. It underscores the limitations of current AI models in real-world scenarios and the difficulty in interpreting their predictions, contributing to limited physician trust in AI-based models. The overarching suggestion is that AI can be a valuable tool in clinicians' hands for treating heart failure patients, as far as existing medical inaccuracies have been addressed before integrating AI into these frameworks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angeliki Bourazana
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Andrew Xanthopoulos
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Alexandros Briasoulis
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Section of Heart Failure and Transplantation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Dimitrios Magouliotis
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece; (D.M.); (K.S.)
| | - Kyriakos Spiliopoulos
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece; (D.M.); (K.S.)
| | - Thanos Athanasiou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Hospital, London W2 1NY, UK
| | - George Vassilopoulos
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly Medical School, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - John Skoularigis
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nazar W, Szymanowicz S, Nazar K, Kaufmann D, Wabich E, Braun-Dullaeus R, Daniłowicz-Szymanowicz L. Artificial intelligence models in prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review. Heart Fail Rev 2024; 29:133-150. [PMID: 37861853 PMCID: PMC10904439 DOI: 10.1007/s10741-023-10357-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
The aim of the presented review is to summarize the literature data on the accuracy and clinical applicability of artificial intelligence (AI) models as a valuable alternative to the current guidelines in predicting cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response and phenotyping of patients eligible for CRT implantation. This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. After a search of Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases, 675 records were identified. Twenty supervised (prediction of CRT response) and 9 unsupervised (clustering and phenotyping) AI models were analyzed qualitatively (22 studies, 14,258 patients). Fifty-five percent of AI models were based on retrospective studies. Unsupervised AI models were able to identify clusters of patients with significantly different rates of primary outcome events (death, heart failure event). In comparison to the guideline-based CRT response prediction accuracy of 70%, supervised AI models trained on cohorts with > 100 patients achieved up to 85% accuracy and an AUC of 0.86 in their prediction of response to CRT for echocardiographic and clinical outcomes, respectively. AI models seem to be an accurate and clinically applicable tool in phenotyping of patients eligible for CRT implantation and predicting potential responders. In the future, AI may help to increase CRT response rates to over 80% and improve clinical decision-making and prognosis of the patients, including reduction of mortality rates. However, these findings must be validated in randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wojciech Nazar
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland
| | | | - Krzysztof Nazar
- Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gabriela Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Damian Kaufmann
- Department of Cardiology and Electrotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-213, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Elżbieta Wabich
- Department of Cardiology and Electrotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-213, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Rüdiger Braun-Dullaeus
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Street 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Ludmiła Daniłowicz-Szymanowicz
- Department of Cardiology and Electrotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-213, Gdańsk, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Westphal P, Luo H, Shahmohammadi M, Prinzen FW, Delhaas T, Cornelussen RN. Machine learning-powered, device-embedded heart sound measurement can optimize AV delay in patients with CRT. Heart Rhythm 2023; 20:1316-1324. [PMID: 37247684 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuous optimization of atrioventricular (AV) delay for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is mainly performed by electrical means. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to develop an estimation model of cardiac function that uses a piezoelectric microphone embedded in a pulse generator to guide CRT optimization. METHODS Electrocardiogram, left ventricular pressure (LVP), and heart sounds were simultaneously collected during CRT device implantation procedures. A piezoelectric alarm transducer embedded in a modified CRT device facilitated recording of heart sounds in patients undergoing a pacing protocol with different AV delays. Machine learning (ML) was used to produce a decision-tree ensemble model capable of estimating absolute maximal LVP (LVPmax) and maximal rise of LVP (LVdP/dtmax) using 3 heart sound-based features. To gauge the applicability of ML in AV delay optimization, polynomial curves were fitted to measured and estimated values. RESULTS In the data set of ∼30,000 heartbeats, ML indicated S1 amplitude, S2 amplitude, and S1 integral (S1 energy for LVdP/dtmax) as most prominent features for AV delay optimization. ML resulted in single-beat estimation precision for absolute values of LVPmax and LVdP/dtmax of 67% and 64%, respectively. For 20-30 beat averages, cross-correlation between measured and estimated LVPmax and LVdP/dtmax was 0.999 for both. The estimated optimal AV delays were not significantly different from those measured using invasive LVP (difference -5.6 ± 17.1 ms for LVPmax and +5.1 ± 6.7 ms for LVdP/dtmax). The difference in function at estimated and measured optimal AV delays was not statiscally significant (1 ± 3 mm Hg for LVPmax and 9 ± 57 mm Hg/s for LVdP/dtmax). CONCLUSION Heart sound sensors embedded in a CRT device, powered by a ML algorithm, provide a reliable assessment of optimal AV delays and absolute LVPmax and LVdP/dtmax.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Westphal
- Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands; Bakken Research Center, Medtronic, plc, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hongxing Luo
- Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mehrdad Shahmohammadi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frits W Prinzen
- Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Tammo Delhaas
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard N Cornelussen
- Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands; Bakken Research Center, Medtronic, plc, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gautam N, Ghanta SN, Clausen A, Saluja P, Sivakumar K, Dhar G, Chang Q, DeMazumder D, Rabbat MG, Greene SJ, Fudim M, Al'Aref SJ. Contemporary Applications of Machine Learning for Device Therapy in Heart Failure. JACC. HEART FAILURE 2022; 10:603-622. [PMID: 36049812 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Despite a better understanding of the underlying pathogenesis of heart failure (HF), pharmacotherapy, surgical, and percutaneous interventions do not prevent disease progression in all patients, and a significant proportion of patients end up requiring advanced therapies. Machine learning (ML) is gaining wider acceptance in cardiovascular medicine because of its ability to incorporate large, complex, and multidimensional data and to potentially facilitate the creation of predictive models not constrained by many of the limitations of traditional statistical approaches. With the coexistence of "big data" and novel advanced analytic techniques using ML, there is ever-increasing research into applying ML in the context of HF with the goal of improving patient outcomes. Through this review, the authors describe the basics of ML and summarize the existing published reports regarding contemporary applications of ML in device therapy for HF while highlighting the limitations to widespread implementation and its future promises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitesh Gautam
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Sai Nikhila Ghanta
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Alex Clausen
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Prachi Saluja
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Kalai Sivakumar
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Gaurav Dhar
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Qi Chang
- Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | | | - Mark G Rabbat
- Department of Cardiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Stephen J Greene
- Department of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Marat Fudim
- Department of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Subhi J Al'Aref
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Suri JS, Bhagawati M, Paul S, Protogerou AD, Sfikakis PP, Kitas GD, Khanna NN, Ruzsa Z, Sharma AM, Saxena S, Faa G, Laird JR, Johri AM, Kalra MK, Paraskevas KI, Saba L. A Powerful Paradigm for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification Using Multiclass, Multi-Label, and Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Paradigms: A Narrative Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12030722. [PMID: 35328275 PMCID: PMC8947682 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Motivation: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) causes the highest mortality globally. With escalating healthcare costs, early non-invasive CVD risk assessment is vital. Conventional methods have shown poor performance compared to more recent and fast-evolving Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods. The proposed study reviews the three most recent paradigms for CVD risk assessment, namely multiclass, multi-label, and ensemble-based methods in (i) office-based and (ii) stress-test laboratories. Methods: A total of 265 CVD-based studies were selected using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) model. Due to its popularity and recent development, the study analyzed the above three paradigms using machine learning (ML) frameworks. We review comprehensively these three methods using attributes, such as architecture, applications, pro-and-cons, scientific validation, clinical evaluation, and AI risk-of-bias (RoB) in the CVD framework. These ML techniques were then extended under mobile and cloud-based infrastructure. Findings: Most popular biomarkers used were office-based, laboratory-based, image-based phenotypes, and medication usage. Surrogate carotid scanning for coronary artery risk prediction had shown promising results. Ground truth (GT) selection for AI-based training along with scientific and clinical validation is very important for CVD stratification to avoid RoB. It was observed that the most popular classification paradigm is multiclass followed by the ensemble, and multi-label. The use of deep learning techniques in CVD risk stratification is in a very early stage of development. Mobile and cloud-based AI technologies are more likely to be the future. Conclusions: AI-based methods for CVD risk assessment are most promising and successful. Choice of GT is most vital in AI-based models to prevent the RoB. The amalgamation of image-based strategies with conventional risk factors provides the highest stability when using the three CVD paradigms in non-cloud and cloud-based frameworks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(916)-749-5628
| | - Mrinalini Bhagawati
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India; (M.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Sudip Paul
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India; (M.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Athanasios D. Protogerou
- Research Unit Clinic, Laboratory of Pathophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Prevention, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Petros P. Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - George D. Kitas
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Manchester University, Manchester 46962, UK;
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110020, India;
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Department of Internal Medicines, Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Aditya M. Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA;
| | - Sanjay Saxena
- Department of CSE, International Institute of Information Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, India;
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, A.O.U., di Cagliari-Polo di Monserrato s.s., 09045 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - John R. Laird
- Cardiology Department, St. Helena Hospital, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | - Manudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| | - Kosmas I. Paraskevas
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Central Clinic of Athens, N. Iraklio, 14122 Athens, Greece;
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, A.O.U., di Cagliari-Polo di Monserrato s.s., 09045 Cagliari, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Reshaping Patient Outcomes With Machine Learning. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2021; 7:1622-1623. [PMID: 34949427 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
8
|
Tereshchenko LG, Howell SJ, Stivland TM, Stein K, Ellenbogen KA. REPLY: Reshaping Patient Outcomes With Machine Learning. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2021; 7:1623-1624. [PMID: 34949428 PMCID: PMC8744148 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|