Efficacy and safety of nateglinide plus vildagliptin combination therapy compared with switching to vildagliptin in type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled with nateglinide

Evaluation of the effect of MTNR1B rs10830963 gene variant on the therapeutic efficacy of nateglinide in treating type 2 diabetes among Chinese Han patients

Genetic polymorphisms in the MTNR1B gene is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, there is no evidence about its impact on the therapeutic efficacy of nateglinide. This prospective case-control study was designed to investigate the effect of MTNR1B rs10830963 gene variant on the therapeutic efficacy of nateglinide in treating T2DM. We genotyped untreated T2DM patients (N = 200) and healthy controls (N = 200) using the method of the high resolution of melting curve (HRM). Newly diagnosed T2DM patients (n = 60) with CYP2C9*1 and SLCO1B1 521TT genotypes were enrolled and given oral nateglinide (360 mg/d) for 8 weeks. The outcome was measured by collecting the venous blood samples before and at the 8th week of the treatment. The risk G allelic frequency of MTNR1B rs10830963 was higher in T2DM patients than the healthy subjects (P < 0.05). Post 8-week of treatment, newly diagnosed T2DM patients showed a less reduction in fasting plasma glucose levels and less increase in the carriers of genotype CG + GG at rs10830963 when compared with the CC genotype (P < 0.05). MTNR1B rs10830963 polymorphism was associated with the therapeutic efficacy of nateglinide in T2DM patients. Also, the CC homozygotes had a better effect than G allele carriers.Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Register ChiCTR13003536, date of registration: May 14, 2013.

Efficacy and Safety of Miglitol- or Repaglinide-Based Combination Therapy with Alogliptin for Drug-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: An Open-Label, Single-Center, Parallel, Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Combination therapy with an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor or glinide plus a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor is thought to be effective for glycemic control because of its effects on postprandial hyperglycemia. However, no studies have directly compared these two combination therapies in relation to efficacy and safety.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with type 2 diabetes were studied. All had diabetes not adequately controlled with diet and exercise therapy, an HbA1c level of ≥7.5%, and were not receiving any medication for diabetes. The patients were randomized to either miglitol- or repaglinide-based combination therapy with alogliptin. Patients received miglitol or repaglinide monotherapy for 3 months (the miglitol and repaglinide groups, respectively), after which alogliptin was added to each group as combination therapy for 3 months. A meal tolerance test (MTT) was performed before the start of treatment and at the end of monotherapy and combination therapy.

RESULTS

During the study period, decreases in HbA1c and glycated albumin were significantly greater in the repaglinide group than in the miglitol group; however, there was no significant difference between treatment groups at the end of the study. At the end of monotherapy, insulin secretion relative to glucose elevation (ISG_0-30: area under the curve of insulin from 0 to 30 min during MTT [AUC_0-30 of IRI]/AUC_0-30 of plasma glucose) was significantly higher only in the repaglinide group; ISG_0-30 did not significantly increase in either group after the addition of alogliptin.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of alogliptin to repaglinide monotherapy did not cause glucose-independent inappropriate insulin secretion and did not appear to increase the incidence of hypoglycemia.

Reduction in glucose fluctuations in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes using repaglinide: A randomized controlled trial of repaglinide vs sulfonylurea

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

Glinides are antidiabetic drugs that enhance the early phase of insulin secretion, but have been considered to be less effective at lowering blood glucose than sulfonylureas. However, glinides show a lower risk of hypoglycemia and a greater effect on postprandial hyperglycemia, and are particularly recommended for use in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. We investigated the efficacy and safety of repaglinide compared with sulfonylurea for the treatment of elderly patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the present multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled trial, 57 elderly lean patients with type 2 diabetes who were being treated with sulfonylureas were studied. They were either switched to repaglinide (Repa group) or continued a sulfonylurea (SU group) for 12 weeks. The primary outcome comprised the change in glycemic control, and among the secondary outcomes was the presence of hypoglycemia and drug compliance.

RESULTS

Although glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was not significantly different between the two groups (SU +0.02% vs Repa -0.07%), greater improvements in the glycated albumin (GA) and GA to HbA1c ratio (GA/HbA1c) were observed in the Repa group (ΔGA, SU +0.12% vs Repa -1.15%; ΔGA/HbA1c, SU +0.01 vs Repa -0.13; each P < 0.01) without increasing hypoglycemia. When the Repa group was subdivided according to whether GA improved, the SU dose before switching to repaglinide was significantly smaller and the homeostatic model assessment of β-cell function was significantly higher in the GA improvement subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from SU to Repa improved GA and GA/HbA1c, and had favorable effects on glucose fluctuation in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes.

Efficacy and safety of nateglinide plus sitagliptin combination therapy in type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled by sitagliptin monotherapy: a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, long-term study

BACKGROUND

Combination therapies of drugs with distinct mechanisms of action are emerging as ways to achieve strict glycemic control, thus preventing the onset and progression of diabetic complications in type 2 diabetes patients. A rapid-acting insulin secretagog, nateglinide, and a potent dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, meet such criteria.

METHODS

A total of 121 patients inadequately controlled with sitagliptin monotherapy received 52-week combination therapy (nateglinide + sitagliptin). The primary endpoint was the safety of the therapy, and its efficacy was also evaluated. A meal tolerance test was performed 4 weeks before the start of combination therapy (week -4) and at week 24 and week 52 after the start of combination therapy.

RESULTS

HbA1c levels were lower at week 52 than at week 0 [-0.42% (95% confidence interval -0.53, -0.31)]. Fasting plasma glucose levels tended to decrease from baseline (week 0) to week 52 [-4.8 mg/dl (-9.4, -0.2)]. In the meal tolerance test, postprandial plasma glucose levels and area under the curve of glucose from before to 2 h after the meal load were lower at week 24 and week 52 than at week -4. In addition, the levels of insulin and active glucagon-like peptide-1 were higher at week 52 than at week -4. Furthermore, the incidence of adverse events in combination therapy with sitagliptin was similar to those previously shown in nateglinide monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Compared with sitagliptin monotherapy, the combination therapy of nateglinide plus sitagliptin was more effective in type 2 diabetes patients at improving glycemic control while showing similar safety.

Characteristics of repaglinide effects on insulin secretion

The dynamics of insulin secretion stimulated by repaglinide, a glinide, and the combinatorial effects of repaglinide and incretin were investigated. At 4.4 mM glucose, repaglinide induced insulin secretion with a gradually increasing first phase, showing different dynamics from that induced by glimepiride, a sulfonylurea. In the presence of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), insulin secretion by repaglinide was augmented significantly but to lesser extent and showed different dynamics from that by glimepiride. At 4.4 mM glucose, the intracellular Ca²⁺ level was gradually increased by repaglinide alone or repaglinide plus GLP-1, which differs from the Ca²⁺ dynamics by glimepiride alone or glimepiride plus GLP-1, suggesting that the difference in Ca²⁺ dynamics contributes to the difference in the dynamics of insulin secretion. At a higher concentration (8.8 mM) of glucose, the dynamics of insulin secretion stimulated by repaglinide was similar to that by glimepiride. Combination of repaglinide and GLP-1 significantly augmented insulin secretion, the amount of which was comparable to that by the combination of glimepiride and GLP-1. The Ca²⁺ dynamics was similar for repaglinide and glimepiride at 8.8 mM glucose. Our data indicate that repaglinide has characteristic properties in its effects on the dynamics of insulin secretion and intracellular Ca²⁺ and that the combination of repaglinide and GLP-1 stimulates insulin secretion more effectively than the combination of glimepiride and GLP-1 at a high concentration of glucose, providing a basis for its use in clinical settings.

Targeting orphan G protein-coupled receptors for the treatment of diabetes and its complications: C-peptide and GPR146

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the most abundant receptor family encoded by the human genome and are the targets of a high percentage of drugs currently in use or in clinical trials for the treatment of diseases such as diabetes and its associated complications. Thus, orphan GPCRs, for which the ligand is unknown, represent an important untapped source of therapeutic potential for the treatment of many diseases. We have identified the previously orphan GPCR, GPR146, as the putative receptor of proinsulin C-peptide, which may prove to be an effective treatment for diabetes-associated complications. For example, we have found a potential role of C-peptide and GPR146 in regulating the function of the retinal pigment epithelium, a monolayer of cells in the retina that serves as part of the blood-retinal barrier and is disrupted in diabetic macular oedema. However, C-peptide signalling in this cell type appears to depend at least in part on extracellular glucose concentration and its interaction with insulin. In this review, we discuss the therapeutic potential of orphan GPCRs with a special focus on C-peptide and GPR146, including past and current strategies used to 'deorphanize' this diverse family of receptors, past successes and the inherent difficulties of this process.

Efficacy and safety of repaglinide added to sitagliptin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized 24-week open-label clinical trial

Although sitagliptin and repaglinide monotherapies improve postprandial hyperglycemia, the long-term effects and safety of their combination has not been examined. In this randomized 24-week trial of Japanese patients with poor control (HbA1c 7.0-8.5%) by sitagliptin, we divided 40 patients randomly into two equal groups of the repaglinide add-on to sitagliptin (ADD-ON, n=20), or sitagliptin switched to repaglinide (SWITCH, n=20). The meal tolerance test was carried out at weeks 0 and 24. The primary outcomes were changes in HbA1c and area under the curves (AUC) of glucose from the baseline to week 24. The mean change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24 was larger in the ADD-ON (-0.87±0.63%, mean±SD), compared with the SWITCH (0.03±0.65%, p=0.000). Significant improvements were noted in the mean changes in fasting glucose and AUCs of glucose in the ADD-ON vs. SWITCH (p=0.007 and p=0.000). Insulin secretion relative to glucose elevation (ISG; defined as AUC insulin/AUC glucose) increased significantly in the ADD-ON, although the mean change in fasting insulin level was significantly decreased in the ADD-ON (p=0.015 and p=0.026). The AUC of glucagon was significantly lower at 24-week relative to baseline in the ADD-ON, but was not significant in the two groups (p=0.047 and p=0.056, respectively). The combination therapy produced significant reductions in HbA1c, AUC of glucose and fasting glucose compared with switching to repaglinide without weight gain or severe hypoglycemia. The improved glycemic control with this combination therapy may be at least in part due to augmentation of repaglinide-induced insulin secretion by sitagliptin.

Comparison of sitagliptin with nateglinide on postprandial glucose and related hormones in drug-naïve Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A pilot study

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glinides are effective in reducing postprandial hyperglycemia. However, little information is available on the comparative effects of the two drugs on the levels of postprandial glucose. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of sitagliptin and nateglinide on meal tolerance tests in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study participants were 19 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, which was inadequately controlled by diet and exercise. An open-label, prospective, cross-over trial was carried out to compare the effects of single-dose sitagliptin and nateglinide on the postprandial glucose level and its related hormones during meal tests.

RESULTS

The change in area under the curve (AUC) of glucose from 0 to 180 min (AUC0-180 min) during the meal test by nateglinide was similar to that by sitagliptin. As expected, the change in active glucagon like peptide-1 was significantly higher after a single-dose of sitagliptin than nateglinide. Then, insulin secretion relative to glucose elevation (ISG) (ΔISG0-180 min: ΔAUC0-180 min insulin/AUC0-180 min glucose) was significantly enhanced by nateglinide compared with sitagliptin. Conversely, glucagon level (ΔAUC0-180 min glucagon) was increased by administration of nateglinide, whereas the glucagon level was reduced by administration of sitagliptin.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of sitagliptin on postprandial glucose levels were similar to those of nateglinide in drug-naïve type 2 diabetes patients. However, the induced changes in insulin, active glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucagon during meal loading suggest that reduction of postprandial hyperglycemia was achieved by the unique effect of each drug.

Efficacy and safety of nateglinide plus vildagliptin combination therapy compared with switching to vildagliptin in type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled with nateglinide

Aims/Introduction

To investigate the efficacy and safety of vildagliptin, a potent dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor, as add‐on to nateglinide, compared with switching to vildagliptin in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients poorly controlled with nateglinide.

Materials and Methods

A total of 40 patients inadequately controlled with nateglinide were randomized to the switching group (n = 20, switching from nateglinide to vildagliptin) or combination group (n = 20, nateglinide plus vildagliptin). A meal tolerance test was carried out at weeks 0 and 24.

Results

The mean changes in glycated hemoglobin from baseline to week 24 were −1.2 ± 0.3% and −0.3 ± 0.5% in patients of the combination and switching groups, respectively, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The mean changes in area under the curve of glucose from 0 to 180 min (AUC_0–180 min) from baseline to week 24 was −361 ± 271.3 mmol·min/L in patients of the combination group compared with 141 ± 241.9 mmol·min/L in those of the switching group (P < 0.001). The incidence of hypoglycemic events was low (three in the combination group), and none of the patients developed severe hypoglycemia. Although the addition of vildagliptin to nateglinide did not significantly increase insulin secretion relative to glucose elevation (ISG) after meal load (ISG_0–180 min: AUC_0–180 min insulin / AUC_0–180 min glucose) in comparison with that in baseline, the mean ISG_0–30 min 24 weeks after addition of vildagliptin to nateglinide was significantly higher than that at baseline. In contrast, switching from nateglinide to vildagliptin reduced the mean ISG_0–180 min, relative to baseline.

Conclusions

The combination therapy of vildagliptin and nateglinide is effective and safe in Japanese type 2 diabetes, and the improved glycemic control is as a result of augmentation of nateglinide‐induced early phase insulin secretion. This trial was registered with UMIN (no. ID000004010).