Should sulfonylurea be discontinued or maintained at the lowest dose when starting ipragliflozin? A multicenter observational study in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes

Glycaemic control efficacy of switching from dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors to oral semaglutide in subjects with type 2 diabetes: A multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison study (SWITCH-SEMA 2 study)

AIM

To assess whether oral semaglutide provides better glycaemic control, compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) continuation, in people with type 2 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this multicentre, open-label, prospective, randomized, parallel-group comparison study, participants receiving DPP-4is were either switched to oral semaglutide (3-14 mg/day) or continued on DPP-4is. The primary endpoint was the change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) over 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included changes in metabolic parameters and biomarkers, along with the occurrence of adverse events. Factors associated with HbA1c improvement were also explored.

RESULTS

In total, 174 eligible participants were enrolled; 17 dropped out of the study. Consequently, 82 participants in the DPP-4i group and 75 participants in the semaglutide group completed the study and were included in the analysis. Improvement in HbA1c at week 24 was significantly greater when switching to semaglutide compared with DPP-4i continuation [-0.65 (95% confidence interval: -0.79, -0.51) vs. +0.05 (95% confidence interval: -0.07, 0.16) (p < .001)]. Body weight, lipid profiles and liver enzymes were significantly improved in the semaglutide group than in the DPP-4i continuation group. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that baseline HbA1c and homeostasis model assessment 2-R were independently associated with HbA1c improvement after switching to semaglutide. Seven participants in the semaglutide group discontinued medication because of gastrointestinal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the potential for gastrointestinal symptoms should be carefully considered, switching from DPP-4is to oral semaglutide may be beneficial for glycaemic control and metabolic abnormalities in people with higher HbA1c and insulin resistance.

Improvement of glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction by switching from liraglutide or dulaglutide to subcutaneous semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: A multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison study (SWITCH-SEMA 1 study)

AIM

To investigate the effects of switching from liraglutide or dulaglutide to once-weekly semaglutide on glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this multicentre, open-labelled, prospective, randomized, parallel-group comparison study, patients treated with liraglutide 0.9-1.8 mg/day (plan A) or dulaglutide 0.75 mg/week (plan B) were either switched to semaglutide or continued current therapy. The primary endpoint was the mean change in glycated haemoglobin over 24 weeks. The secondary endpoints included the changes of Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire scores, body weight and metabolic indices.

RESULTS

In total, 110 patients were enrolled, and 10 were excluded; therefore, 37 patients in plan A and 63 patients in plan B completed the study. Glycated haemoglobin levels were significantly reduced in the semaglutide group in both plans [plan A, 7.8% ± 1.0% to 7.8% ± 0.7% (liraglutide) vs. 7.9% ± 0.7% to 7.3% ± 0.7% (semaglutide), p < .01; plan B, 7.8% ± 1.0% to 7.9% ± 1.2% (dulaglutide) vs. 7.8% ± 0.8% to 7.1% ± 0.6% (semaglutide), p < .01]. Semaglutide also improved Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire scores in both groups (plan A, +0.1 vs. +8.3, p < .01; plan B, -1.2 vs. +3.5, p < .01). Switching from dulaglutide yielded greater reductions in body weight and improved metabolic parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-weekly semaglutide administration improved glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction after switching from liraglutide or dulaglutide. These results highlighted a useful treatment option for patients with metabolic abnormalities despite glucagon-like receptor-1 receptor agonist treatment.

Lowering of blood pressure and pulse rate by switching from DPP-4 inhibitor to luseogliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes complicated with hypertension: A multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison trial (LUNA study)

AIMS

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) reduces clinic blood pressure (BP), but the effects on BP circadian rhythm remain unclear. The present study aimed to determine the nighttime antihypertensive effect of SGLT2i compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial, patients treated with DPP-4i were either switched to luseogliflozin 2.5 mg/day (Luseo group;n = 30) or continued DPP-4i (DPP-4i group;n = 26). The patients undertook 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring before and 8 weeks after the group allocation. The primary endpoint was mean change in nighttime systolic BP (SBP).

RESULTS

Nighttime SBP, as well as daytime SBP, was significantly reduced in the Luseo group compared with the DPP-4i group (nighttime, -4.0 ± 11.4 vs. 3.6 ± 10.7 mmHg,P = 0.01; daytime, -4.4 ± 10.9 vs. 3.7 ± 11.9 mmHg,P = 0.01). Similarly, nighttimepulse rate(PR) was significantly reduced in the Luseo group (-2.0 ± 4.8 vs. 0.9 ± 4.8 bpm,P = 0.03). The proportion of patients with abnormal BP circadian rhythms (non-dipper pattern plus riser pattern) was significantly lower in the Luseo group (36.6% vs. 56.7%,P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from DPP-4i to luseogliflozin decreased nighttime SBP and PR; moreover, BP circadian rhythm was improved.

Adding Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors to Sulfonylureas and Risk of Hypoglycemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Hypoglycemia is an important event that could be related to increased mortality in patients with diabetes. The risk of hypoglycemia is not clearly illustrated to increase when Sodiumglucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors are used concomitantly with sulfonylureas. The present study will assess the risk of hypoglycemia associated with the concomitant use of SGLT-2 inhibitors and sulfonylureas compared with placebo and sulfonylureas.

METHOD

We searched Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrial.gov and identified the randomized trials comparing SGLT-2 inhibitors with placebo for type 2 diabetes treated with sulfonylureas. The risk of bias in each trial was assessed using the Cochrane tool. The risk ratio of hypoglycemia was measured using the Mantel Haenszel method. We also performed subgroup analysis to examine the dosage effects. The number needed to harm (NNH) was measured according to the duration of intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies, including 3761 participants, were enrolled in our systematic review and meta-analysis. The risk ratio of hypoglycemia was 1.67 (95% CI 1.42 to 1.97). The NNH was 13 (95% CI 9 to 21) for a treatment duration of 24 weeks or less, 11 (8 to 18) for 25 to 48 weeks, and 7 (5 to 10) for more than 48 weeks. Subgroup analysis showed that no difference was found between higher and lower doses of SGLT-2 inhibitors. The risk ratio related to lower dose SGLT-2 inhibitors was 1.56 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.88), and the risk ratio related to higher dose SGLT-2 inhibitors was 1.70 (95% CI 1.42 to 2.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of hypoglycemia was significantly increased in subjects treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors compared with placebo. Addition of SGLT-2 inhibitors to sulfonylureas would lead to one more case of hypoglycemia in every 13 patients with a treatment duration less than 24 weeks. This suggests that a decrease in sulfonylureas dose may be an important recommendation when adding SGLT-2 inhibitors to sulfonylureas.

Favourable effect of the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor canagliflozin plus the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor teneligliptin in combination on glycaemic fluctuation: An open-label, prospective, randomized, parallel-group comparison trial (the CALMER study)

This multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, parallel-group, short-term (4-5 weeks) controlled trial was conducted to investigate the superiority of the effect of reducing mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE) during meal tolerance tests (MTTs) for the combination of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor compared with SGLT2 inhibitor monotherapy. Ninety-nine patients with type 2 diabetes who were taking teneligliptin (20 mg/d) were randomized to one of the following two groups: those who switched to 100 mg/d of canagliflozin (SWITCH group) or those who added 100 mg/d of canagliflozin (COMB group). MAGE in the COMB group was significantly decreased compared with that in the SWITCH group (COMB 117.5 ± 39.8 to 92.2 ± 28.0 mg/dL vs SWITCH 110.7 ± 29.8 to 104.2 ± 27.6 mg/dL; P<0.01). Mean blood glucose decreased significantly during MTTs in both groups, although the extent of the reduction was significantly greater in the COMB group (COMB 142.3 ± 28.7 to 119.5 ± 25.1 mg/dL vs SWITCH 146.4 ± 25.5 to 135.5 ± 22.4 mg/dL; P < 0.01). SGLT2 inhibitor combined with DPP-4 inhibitor therapy strongly reduced glycaemic fluctuation compared with SGLT2 inhibitor monotherapy.

Factors with remission of fatty liver in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with ipragliflozin

We investigated the factors associated with fatty liver remission via treatment with ipragliflozin. The analysis was obtained from our multi-center prospective observational study, including 200 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with ipragliflozin (50 mg/day) for 24 weeks. The extent of fatty liver was estimated using a fatty liver index (FLI). Based on the FLI after the treatment with ipragliflozin, patients were classified into remission group (FLI < 30) and non-remission group (FLI ≥ 30). After treatment with ipragliflozin for 24 weeks, FLI significantly improved from 64.5 ± 21.6 to 51.9 ± 26.5 (p < 0.01). Body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and FLI in the remission group were significantly lower compared with those of the non-remission group. Stepwise analysis showed that the baseline FLI (Odds ratio 0.86; 95% confidence interval 0.81-0.90, p < 0.01) was an independent factor associated with FLI remission. Using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the adequate cut-off value for the remission was 50. The area under the ROC curve was 0.93 with the sensitivity and specificity 84.6% and 90.1% respectively. In conclusion, ipragliflozin ameliorated fatty liver. These results suggest that patients with fatty liver with a lower FLI are more likely to attain remission by the treatment with ipragliflozin.