Mirogabalin for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study in Asian patients

Mirogabalin: a novel gabapentinoid or another false dawn?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mirogabalin is a novel gabapentinoid medication for the treatment of neuropathic pain. The purpose of this review is to discuss current evidence for its use. Gabapentinoids are widely prescribed for neuropathic pain. Mirogabalin offers theoretical advantages over traditional gabapentinoids due to its specificity for the α2δ-1 subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels. It is theorised that this specificity may reduce adverse drug reactions by minimising binding to the α2δ-2 subunit which is responsible for many of the gabapentinoid side effects.

RECENT FINDINGS

Mirogabalin's slower dissociation from the α2δ-1 compared with α2δ-2, and its higher potency may also impart an efficacy benefit over traditional gabapentinoids. These theoretical advantages of mirogabalin remain inconclusive in clinical practice, with mixed evidence regarding mirogabalin versus traditional gabapentinoids. Some studies suggest a reduced side effect profile yet, others fail to demonstrate significant differences. Regarding efficacy, mirogabalin may be superior to placebo for several neuropathic pain syndromes, but evidence of widespread benefit over traditional gabapentinoids is currently lacking.

SUMMARY

Mirogabalin offers theoretical promise, but large, independent studies are required to further assess its performance versus traditional gabapentinoids.

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled 14-Week Study of Mirogabalin in Chinese Patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

INTRODUCTION

There is no approved effective drug for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) in China. Gabapentinoids including mirogabalin have shown promise, although data in Chinese patients are scarce.

METHODS

This phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin for treating DPNP in China. Mirogabalin was administered at 5 mg twice daily for the first week and uptitrated to 15 mg twice daily for a total duration of 14 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in weekly average daily pain score (ADPS) at week 14; secondary endpoints included the ADPS responder rate, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire visual analogue scale score, patient global impression of change (PGIC), average daily sleep interference score (ADSIS), EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L), and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

RESULTS

Of 393 patients (mirogabalin, n = 196; placebo n = 197), the mean age was 58.2 years (mirogabalin, 58.7 years; placebo, 57.7 years) and 54.2% were male (mirogabalin, 56.1%; placebo, 52.3%). Mirogabalin elicited a greater change from baseline in the weekly ADPS vs. placebo at week 14: least-squares mean difference (95% confidence interval) vs. placebo - 0.39 (- 0.74, - 0.04), p = 0.0301. PGIC, ADSIS, and EQ-5D-5L data reflected significantly better improvements for patients receiving mirogabalin vs. placebo. The incidence of TEAEs was 75.0% and 75.1% in the mirogabalin and placebo groups, respectively. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate, and the incidence of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation was 2.6% in the mirogabalin group and 1.5% in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the effect size of mirogabalin was reduced due to the placebo effect, mirogabalin is a safe and effective treatment option for Chinese patients with DPNP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04094662.

A Comprehensive Review of Safety, Efficacy, and Indications for the Use of Alpha-Lipoic Acid and Acetyl-L-Carnitine in Neuropathic Pain

The debilitating, chronic symptoms of neuropathic pain result in decreased quality of life, depressed mood, and anxiety in patients suffering from neuropathic pain. Despite hundreds of dollars in monthly treatment-related costs, more than half of the patients report inadequate pain relief. Traditional first-line agents are expensive and may have disruptive side effects. Given the disease burden of neuropathic pain, many patients turn to over-the-counter supplements. Here we review two supplements, alpha-lipoic acid (ALA), also known as thioctic acid, and acetyl-L-carnitine (ALC), and data of treatment outcomes from the available literature suggest comparable efficacy to currently available pharmaceuticals for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials demonstrates that ALA can significantly improve neuropathic pain and nerve conduction velocity. ALA has been evaluated in the treatment of multiple sources of neuropathic pain, including chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, entrapment neuropathies, radicular nerve pain, and burning mouth syndrome. Common dose-dependent side effects include nausea, vomiting, and vertigo. Cost analysis from June 2022 indicates that a clinically effective dose (600 mg/day) of ALA costs patients $14.40 monthly. Two randomized control trials demonstrate that ALC exhibits neuroprotective effects, can regenerate nerves, and improve vibratory perception in the early stages of DPN. In terms of adverse reactions, no significant differences were observed between treatment and placebo groups, implying that ALC is generally well-tolerated. Cost analysis from June 2022 indicates that a clinically effective dose of ALC (2000 mg/day) costs patients $27.60 monthly. Comparable efficacy in clinical trials, minimal side effects, and lower monthly costs suggest that ALA and ALC should be considered among the accepted first-line treatment options for neuropathic pain.

Efficacy of Mirogabalin for Taxane-associated Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Perioperative Chemotherapy for Early Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

Treatment with taxanes can result in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). We investigated the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin for the treatment of CIPN in patients who had been administered perioperative chemotherapy including taxane-based agents for breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the case of 43 patients with early breast cancer who received a taxane as perioperative chemotherapy and were administered mirogabalin at the diagnosis of CIPN.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (83.7%) had grade 1 CIPN and the other seven patients (16.3%) had grade 2 CIPN. The median mirogabalin dose was 10 mg (5-30 mg). CIPN improved from grade 1 to 0 in 12 patients (27.9%) and from grade 2 to 1 in one patient (2.3%); 13 (30.2%) patients thus had an objective therapeutic response. There were no cases in which chemotherapy was reduced or discontinued due to CIPN. Adverse events were evaluated by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and included five cases of dizziness (11.7%), three of somnolence (7.0%), and two of nausea (4.7%), all of which were grade ≤2. There were no cases of serious (grade ≥3) adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Mirogabalin may be effective and safe for treating CIPN of patients who receive a taxane in a perioperative breast cancer setting.

Expert opinion on screening, diagnosis and management of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a multidisciplinary approach

The proposed expert opinion aimed to address the current knowledge on conceptual, clinical, and therapeutic aspects of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and to provide a guidance document to assist clinicians for the best practice in DPN care. The participating experts consider the suspicion of the disease by clinicians as a key factor in early recognition and diagnosis, emphasizing an improved awareness of the disease by the first-admission or referring physicians. The proposed "screening and diagnostic" algorithm involves the consideration of DPN in a patient with prediabetes or diabetes who presents with neuropathic symptoms and/or signs of neuropathy in the presence of DPN risk factors, with careful consideration of laboratory testing to rule out other causes of distal symmetric peripheral neuropathy and referral for a detailed neurological work-up for a confirmative test of either small or large nerve fiber dysfunction in atypical cases. Although, the first-line interventions for DPN are currently represented by optimized glycemic control (mainly for type 1 diabetes) and multifactorial intervention (mainly for type 2 diabetes), there is a need for individualized pathogenesis-directed treatment approaches for DPN. Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) seems to be an important first-line pathogenesis-directed agent, given that it is a direct and indirect antioxidant that works with a strategy targeted directly against reactive oxygen species and indirectly in favor of endogenous antioxidant capacity for improving DPN conditions. There is still a gap in existing research in the field, necessitating well-designed, robust, multicenter clinical trials with sensitive endpoints and standardized protocols to facilitate the diagnosis of DPN via a simple and effective algorithm and to track progression of disease and treatment response. Identification of biomarkers/predictors that would allow an individualized approach from a potentially disease-modifying perspective may provide opportunities for novel treatments that would be efficacious in early stages of DPN, and may modify the natural course of the disease. This expert opinion document is expected to increase awareness among physicians about conceptual, clinical, and therapeutic aspects of DPN and to assist them in timely recognition of DPN and translating this information into their clinical practice for best practice in the management of patients with DPN.

Modeling an evaluation of the efficacy of the novel neuroanalgesic drug mirogabalin for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain and postherpetic neuralgia therapy

Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) are challenging and often intractable complex medical conditions, with a substantial impact on the quality of life. Mirogabalin, a novel voltage-gated Ca2+ channel α2δ ligand, was approved for the indication of DPNP and PHN. However, the time course of effects has not yet been clarified.We aimed to establish pharmacodynamic and placebo effect models of mirogabalin and pregabalin in DPNP and PHN, and to quantitatively compare the efficacy characteristics (maximum efficacy, onset time, and other pharmacodynamic parameters) and safety of mirogabalin and pregabalin. Public databases were comprehensively searched for randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials. A model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) was developed to describe the time course of drug efficacy and placebo effects. Adverse events were compared using a fixed-effects meta-analysis. Sixteen studies including 5,147 participants were eligible for this study. The placebo effect was relatively high and gradually increased with time, and it required at least eight weeks to reach a plateau. The pharmacodynamic model revealed that the maximum pure efficacy for mirogabalin and pregabalin was approximately -7.85 % and -8.86 %, respectively; the efficacy of mirogabalin to relieve DPNP and PHN was not superior to that of pregabalin, and both drugs had similar safety. While the rate constant of the onset rate of pregabalin was approximately thrice as high as that of mirogabalin. In addition, the baseline level of pain was an important factor affecting pregabalin efficacy. These findings are helpful in evaluating the clinical extension value of mirogabalin. They suggest that the high placebo effect and the baseline level of pain should be considered when grouping patients in future research and development of voltage-gated Ca2+ channel neuroanalgesic.

Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome in the era of minimally invasive thoracic surgery

Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) is defined as pain around the wound that persists for more than 2 months after surgery. Persistent pain not only increases the use of analgesics and their side effects but also causes many social problems, such as decreased activities of daily living, decreased quality of life, and increased medical costs. In particular, thoracic surgery is associated with a higher frequency and severity of chronic pain than is surgery for other diseases. The basic principles of postoperative pain treatment, not limited to thoracic surgery, are multimodal analgesic methods (using combinations of several drugs to minimize opioid use) and around-the-clock treatment (administering analgesics at a fixed time and in sufficient doses). Thoracic surgeons must always be aware of the following three points: acute severe postoperative pain is a major risk factor for chronic pain; neuropathic pain due to intercostal nerve injury is a major cause of postoperative pain after thoracic surgery, and its presence must not be overlooked from the acute stage; and analgesics must be administered in sufficient quantities according to dosage and volume. The frequency of PTPS has decreased compared with that in the standard thoracotomy era because of the development of analgesia and the widespread use of minimally invasive procedures such as thoracoscopic surgery and robot-assisted surgery. However, no consistently effective prevention or treatment strategies for PTPS have yet been established. In this review, we focus on PTPS in the era of minimally invasive surgery and discuss the role of thoracic surgeons in its management.

Therapeutic Efficacy of Mirogabalin in managing Trigeminal Neuralgia

Trigeminal neuralgia presents significant challenges in management, often requiring alternative pharmacotherapy due to resistance or side effects to first-line medications like carbamazepine. This case series investigates the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin, a novel α2δ ligand, in six trigeminal neuralgia patients. Mirogabalin demonstrated varying degrees of pain reduction, with an average Numerical Rating Scale improvement rate of 43.1%. Side effects were generally mild, with drowsiness and dizziness being the most common. Despite limited efficacy in some cases, mirogabalin shows promise as a potential treatment option for trigeminal neuralgia, warranting further investigation. Key words:Trigeminal neuralgia, mirogabalin, α2δ lig.

New concepts drive the development of delivery tools for sustainable treatment of diabetic complications

Diabetic complications, especially diabetic retinopathy, diabetic nephropathy and painful diabetic neuropathy, account for a large portion of patients with diabetes and display rising global prevalence. They are the leading causes of blindness, kidney failure and hypersensitivity to pain caused by diabetes. Current approved therapeutics against the diabetic complications are few and exhibit limited efficacy. The enhanced cell-specificity, stability, biocompatibility, and loading capacity of drugs are essential for the mitigation of diabetic complications. In the article, we have critically discussed the recent studies over the past two years in material sciences and biochemistry. The insightful concepts in these studies drive the development of novel nanoparticles and mesenchymal stem cells-derived extracellular vesicles to meet the need for treatment of diabetic complications. Their underlying biochemical principles, advantages and limitations have been in-depth analyzed. The nanoparticles discussed in the article include double-headed nanodelivery system, nanozyme, ESC-HCM-B system, soft polymer nanostars, tetrahedral DNA nanostructures and hydrogels. They ameliorate the diabetic complication through attenuation of inflammation, apoptosis and restoration of metabolic homeostasis. Moreover, mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles efficiently deliver therapeutic proteins to the retinal cells to suppress the angiogenesis, inflammation, apoptosis and oxidative stress to reverse diabetic retinopathy. Collectively, we provide a critical discussion on the concept, mechanism and therapeutic applicability of new delivery tools to treat these three devastating diabetic complications.

Efficacy and safety of add-on mirogabalin to conventional therapy for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain after thoracic surgery: the multicenter, randomized, open-label ADMIT-NeP study

BACKGROUND

For chronic pain after thoracic surgery, optimal timing of its diagnosis and effective treatment remains unresolved, although several treatment options are currently available. We examined the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin, in combination with conventional pain therapy (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and/or acetaminophen), for treating peripheral neuropathic pain (NeP) after thoracic surgery.

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study, patients with peripheral NeP were randomly assigned 1:1 to mirogabalin as add-on to conventional therapy or conventional treatment alone.

RESULTS

Of 131 patients of consent obtained, 128 were randomized (mirogabalin add-on group, 63 patients; conventional treatment group, 65 patients). The least squares mean changes (95% confidence interval [CI]) in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for pain intensity at rest from baseline to Week 8 (primary endpoint) were - 51.3 (- 54.9, - 47.7) mm in the mirogabalin add-on group and - 47.7 (- 51.2, - 44.2) mm in the conventional group (between-group difference: - 3.6 [95% CI: - 8.7, 1.5], P = 0.161). However, in patients with Self-administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) score (used for the screening of NeP) ≥ 12 at baseline, the greater the S-LANSS score at baseline, the greater the decrease in VAS score in the mirogabalin add-on group, while no such trend was observed in the conventional treatment group (post hoc analysis). This between-group difference in trends was statistically significant (interaction P value = 0.014). Chronic pain was recorded in 7.9% vs. 16.9% of patients (P = 0.171) at Week 12 in the mirogabalin add-on vs. conventional treatment groups, respectively. Regarding activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QOL), changes in Pain Disability Assessment Scale score and the EQ-5D-5L index value from baseline to Week 8 showed significant improvement in the mirogabalin add-on group vs. conventional treatment group (P < 0.001). The most common adverse events (AEs) in the mirogabalin add-on group were dizziness (12.7%), somnolence (7.9%), and urticaria (3.2%). Most AEs were mild or moderate in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of mirogabalin to conventional therapy did not result in significant improvement in pain intensity based on VAS scores, but did result in significant improvement in ADL and QOL in patients with peripheral NeP after thoracic surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs071200053 (registered 17/11/2020).

Conventional management and current guidelines for painful diabetic neuropathy

Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (PDN) is common, affecting around a quarter of patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and can lead to significant curtailment of functionality and quality of life. Patients may present with unremitting burning, aching or "electric-shock" type pains in their feet, legs and later, in the hands. Conventional management approaches must focus not only on pain relief, but also on concurrent sleep problems, mood disorders and functionality. The mainstay of treatment is pharmacotherapy. Most current international guidelines recommend a choice of four drugs: amitriptyline, duloxetine, pregabalin or gabapentin, as initial treatment for PDN. Recent evidence from the OPTION-DM trial demonstrated that these drugs and their combinations have equivalent efficacy. Moreover, combination treatment provided significant pain relief to patients with inadequate response to the maximum tolerated dose of monotherapy. PDN refractory to pharmacotherapy can be treated with capsaicin 8% or high frequency spinal cord stimulation.

Naturally Inspired Molecules for Neuropathic Pain Inhibition-Effect of Mirogabalin and Cebranopadol on Mechanical and Thermal Nociceptive Threshold in Mice

BACKGROUND

Neuropathic pain is drug-resistant to available analgesics and therefore novel treatment options for this debilitating clinical condition are urgently needed. Recently, two drug candidates, namely mirogabalin and cebranopadol have become a subject of interest because of their potential utility as analgesics for chronic pain treatment. However, they have not been investigated thoroughly in some types of neuropathic pain, both in humans and experimental animals.

METHODS

This study used the von Frey test, the hot plate test and the two-plate thermal place preference test supported by image analysis and machine learning to assess the effect of intraperitoneal mirogabalin and subcutaneous cebranopadol on mechanical and thermal nociceptive threshold in mouse models of neuropathic pain induced by streptozotocin, paclitaxel and oxaliplatin.

RESULTS

Mirogabalin and cebranopadol effectively attenuated tactile allodynia in models of neuropathic pain induced by streptozotocin and paclitaxel. Cebranopadol was more effective than mirogabalin in this respect. Both drugs also elevated the heat nociceptive threshold in mice. In the oxaliplatin model, cebranopadol and mirogabalin reduced cold-exacerbated pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Since mirogabalin and cebranopadol are effective in animal models of neuropathic pain, they seem to be promising novel therapies for various types of neuropathic pain in patients, in particular those who are resistant to available analgesics.

Efficacy and safety of mirogabalin for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a prospective single-arm trial (MiroCIP study)

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a painful, dose-limiting adverse effect of commonly used chemotherapeutic agents. The purpose of this exploratory study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin in patients with moderate to severe CIPN during chemotherapy and the effects of 12 weeks' intervention on chemotherapy completion and CIPN severity.

METHODS

Patients experiencing moderate to severe CIPN while undergoing oxaliplatin- or taxane-containing chemotherapy for colorectal, gastric, non-small-cell lung, or breast cancer received mirogabalin at between 5 and 15 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was change in numeric rating scale (NRS) score for pain from baseline to week 12. Secondary endpoints included NRS scores for tingling and sleep, completion of chemotherapy, severity of CIPN, and quality of life (QOL) scores. The safety endpoint was incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

Of 58 patients who consented to participation, 52 were eligible and constituted the full analysis set and safety analysis set. From baseline to week 12 (last observation carried forward [LOCF]), NRS score decreased by 30.9%: mean change (95% confidence interval [CI]), - 1.7 (- 2.4 to - 1.0) (p < 0.001). Patients with baseline NRS of ≥ 6 experienced a 44.0% reduction in score from baseline to week 12 (LOCF): mean change (95% CI), - 3.3 (- 5.0 to - 1.5) (p = 0.002). Chemotherapy was discontinued in 18 (34.6%) patients; CIPN led to discontinuation in only 2 (3.8%). There was no notable worsening of CIPN severity in terms of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade or Modified Total Neuropathy Score-reduced, although use of pain medications during chemotherapy might cause worsening of CIPN due to underestimation of subjective symptoms. QOL score based on the EuroQol five-dimensional descriptive system did not worsen during the 12 weeks. Thirty-one percent of patients experienced adverse drug reactions, and the most common event was somnolence (13.5%). Serious adverse events and death occurred in 3 patients and 1 patient, respectively; however, they were unrelated to mirogabalin treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Intervention with mirogabalin during chemotherapy may be effective and safe for cancer patients with moderate to severe CIPN. It can contribute to completion of chemotherapy without worsening of CIPN.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031210101, registered 20/5/2021).

Pharmacological and Nonpharmacological Treatments for Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the most prevalent chronic complications of diabetes. The lifetime prevalence of DPN is thought to be >50%, and 15%-25% of patients with diabetes experience neuropathic pain, referred to as "painful DPN." Appropriate treatment of painful DPN is important because this pain contributes to a poor quality of life by causing sleep disturbance, anxiety, and depression. The basic principle for the management of painful DPN is to control hyperglycemia and other modifiable risk factors, but these may be insufficient for preventing or improving DPN. Because there is no promising diseasemodifying medication for DPN, the pain itself needs to be managed when treating painful DPN. Drugs for neuropathic pain, such as gabapentinoids, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, alpha-lipoic acid, sodium channel blockers, and topical capsaicin, are used for the management of painful DPN. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved pregabalin, duloxetine, tapentadol, and the 8% capsaicin patch as drugs for the treatment of painful DPN. Recently, spinal cord stimulation using electrical stimulation is approved by the FDA for the treatment for painful DPN. This review describes the currently available pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments for painful DPN.

Neuropathic pain: From actual pharmacological treatments to new therapeutic horizons

Neuropathic pain, caused by a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory system, affects between 3 and 17% of the general population. The treatment of neuropathic pain is challenging due to its heterogeneous etiologies, lack of objective diagnostic tools and resistance to classical analgesic drugs. First-line treatments recommended by the Special Interest Group on Neuropathic Pain (NeuPSIG) and European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) include gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and selective serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Nevertheless these treatments have modest efficacy or dose limiting side effects. There is therefore a growing number of preclinical and clinical studies aim at developing new treatment strategies to treat neuropathic pain with better efficacy, selectivity, and less side effects. In this review, after a brief description of the mechanisms of action, efficacy, and limitations of current therapeutic drugs, we reviewed new preclinical and clinical targets currently under investigation, as well as promising non-pharmacological alternatives and their potential co-use with pharmacological treatments.

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Mirogabalin Orally Disintegrating Tablets and Conventional Tablets in Healthy Japanese Participants

This single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-group, 2-stage crossover trial evaluated the bioequivalence of 15 mg of mirogabalin as orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs) with conventional mirogabalin tablets in healthy Japanese men. The trial involved two studies: in Study 1, the ODT formulation was taken without water, and in Study 2, the ODT formulation was taken with water. The conventional tablet was taken with water in both studies. We investigated the pharmacokinetic parameters and bioequivalence of the 2 formulations, including the maximum plasma concentration and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable time. The plasma concentrations of mirogabalin were determined by a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method. A total of 72 participants were enrolled and completed the trial. The geometric least-squares mean ratios of maximum plasma concentration of the ODT formulation to the conventional formulation were within the prespecified bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25 (Study 1, 0.995; Study 2, 1.009), as was the area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable time (Study 1, 1.023; Study 2, 1.035). No serious adverse events were observed. In conclusion, mirogabalin 15-mg ODTs, either with or without water, were bioequivalent to conventional 15-mg tablets.

Efficacy and safety of drug therapy for the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the most common dose-limiting side effects of chemotherapeutic drugs. Numerous clinical trials of various targeted drugs for the prevention or treatment of CIPN have been conducted; however, previous systematic reviews with direct comparisons have failed to demonstrate the efficacy of these drugs in the prevention or treatment of CIPN. In addition, no systematic reviews have indirectly compared CIPN prevention and treatment. This article describes a protocol for evaluating the efficacy and safety of drug therapy for the prevention and treatment of CIPN. The results of the proposed systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) will provide new insights into the prevention and treatment of CIPN.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a literature search in MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov to find relevant articles published through January 2023. We will include studies that investigated the efficacy and safety of vitamin B12, goshajinkigan, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics, opioids, calcium and magnesium, antidepressants and anticonvulsants on CIPN. Two authors will individually screen the retrieved reports and review the full text based on the selection criteria. The primary outcome is the incidence and severity of CIPN. The risk of bias will be assessed using V.2.0 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. We will apply a frequentist random-effects NMA model to pool effect sizes across trials using risk ratios and mean differences with their 95% CIs. Competing interventions will be ranked using the surface under cumulative ranking probabilities. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the heterogeneity variance τ2, Cochran's Q test and I² statistic.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This review does not require ethical approval. The research will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022371829.

Clinical Effectiveness of Mirogabalin Besylate for Trigeminal Neuropathy after Skull Base Surgery: Illustrative Cases

BACKGROUND

Postoperative trigeminal neuropathy may be seen after surgery for middle and posterior cranial fossa lesions. Although neuropathic pain is a cause of reduced quality of life, global consensus on postoperative pain management is lacking. Mirogabalin besylate is a selective ligand for the α2δ subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels. Although mirogabalin has been used for patients with postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, few reports have assessed the effect on postsurgical neuropathy. In this report, we describe a clinical effectiveness of mirogabalin for trigeminal neuropathy after skull base surgery.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Case 1: A 51-year-old female with right trigeminal schwannoma was operated on via the anterior transpetrosal approach. She had tingling and numb feelings in the right face postoperatively. Mirogabalin was orally administered after the operation. Her continuous facial numbness immediately improved. Case 2: A 55-year-old female with left middle fossa base meningioma extending into the infratemporal fossa was operated on via the infratemporal fossa approach. She had a tingling feeling in the left face postoperatively. Mirogabalin was orally administered for this symptom after the operation, which gradually improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Mirogabalin may show significant pain relief for patients with trigeminal neuropathy after skull base surgery. Further studies using a larger number of patients are warranted to confirm these findings.

Safety of mirogabalin and pregabalin in Japanese patients with neuropathic pain: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have compared the safety risks between the gabapentinoids, pregabalin, and mirogabalin in post-marketing clinical settings. We assessed reported events associated with gabapentinoid use in patients with neuropathic pain.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study between September 2020 and December 2020 using the community pharmacies records in Japan. The pharmacists identified new vs. prevalent users of mirogabalin and pregabalin in September 2020 and reported data regarding baseline and adverse events to the Japan Pharmaceutical Association using web-based questionnaires. The incidence of events and hazard ratio (HR) were consequently compared.

RESULTS

New users of mirogabalin and pregabalin were identified (n = 1,650 and 2,244; mean age (SD): 69 (15) and 68 (16) years; women: 59% and 56%, respectively). Although serious events were not reported, a marked difference in HRs of common adverse events, including somnolence (1.6), dizziness (1.3), nausea (2.8), edema (3.1), and acetaminophen (2.0)/antidepressant (2.4) addition, was observed.

CONCLUSION

No new serious safety concerns were found for mirogabalin and pregabalin use in patients with neuropathic pain, although the HR of some events indicated increased risk among mirogabalin users. However, further studies are needed as estimates for events occurring in small numbers with wide confidence intervals.

Somnolence and Dizziness During Mirogabalin Treatment in Patients With Neuropathic Pain Related to Lumbar Disease Who Switched From Pregabalin: A Retrospective Study

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate adverse events (AEs) in patients with neuropathic pain related to lumbar disease who switched to mirogabalin from pregabalin.

METHODS

This study surveyed the records of 82 patients with peripheral neuropathic leg pain related to lumbar disease who switched to mirogabalin from pregabalin. We evaluated AEs associated with pregabalin and mirogabalin, the continuation rate of mirogabalin, and the pain-relieving effect at 4 weeks after switching from pregabalin to mirogabalin. We compared patients who switched due to lack of efficacy (LoE group) and patients who switched due to AEs (AE group).

RESULTS

The incidence rates of somnolence and dizziness with pregabalin were 12.2% and 14.6%, respectively, while the incidence rates with mirogabalin were reduced to 7.3% for somnolence and 4.9% for dizziness. The incidence of AEs with pregabalin was significantly higher in the AE group (LoE group: 11.1%, AE group 100%), especially for somnolence (LoE group: 3.2%, AE group: 47.1%) and dizziness (LoE group: 4.8%, AE: 52.9%). After switching, the incidences of AEs with mirogabalin were not significantly different between the 2 groups (LoE group: 15.9%, AE group: 23.5%), including for somnolence (LoE group: 7.9%, AE group: 5.9%) and dizziness (LoE group: 4.8%, AE group: 5.9%). There were no significant differences in continuation rate of mirogabalin or the pain-relieving effect between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients who experience somnolence and dizziness with pregabalin might be able to continue safely receiving treatment for their pain by switching to mirogabalin.

A Review of Recent Pharmacological Advances in the Management of Diabetes-Associated Peripheral Neuropathy

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is a common complication of longstanding diabetes mellitus. These neuropathies can present in various forms, and with the increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus, a subsequent increase in peripheral neuropathy cases has been noted. Peripheral neuropathy has a significant societal and economic burden, with patients requiring concomitant medication and often experiencing a decline in their quality of life. There is currently a wide variety of pharmacological interventions, including serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, gapentanoids, sodium channel blockers, and tricyclic antidepressants. These medications will be discussed, as well as their respective efficacies. Recent advances in the treatment of diabetes mellitus with incretin system-modulating drugs, specifically glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists, have been promising, and their potential implication in the treatment of peripheral diabetic neuropathy is discussed in this review.

Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Single and Multiple Doses of Mirogabalin in Healthy Chinese Participants: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

INTRODUCTION

Mirogabalin is a treatment option for patients with neuropathic pain; however, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) data specifically for Chinese individuals are limited to a single-dose study. We aimed to assess these for both single- and multiple-dose mirogabalin in healthy Chinese participants.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I study, 54 healthy Chinese men and women aged 18-45 years were randomly allocated to receive single- (5, 10, or 15 mg, daily) or multiple-dose (5 mg titrated to 15 mg, twice-daily, over 22 days) oral mirogabalin or placebo. In each of three single-dose groups, 10 participants received mirogabalin and 2 received placebo; in the multiple-dose group, 14 participants received mirogabalin and 4 received placebo. The primary endpoints were PK, safety, and tolerability variables, including treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), laboratory tests, and vital signs. PK data were collected for both single- and multiple-dose cohorts and evaluated by non-compartmental analysis.

RESULTS

Single- and multiple-dose mirogabalin was generally well tolerated with no deaths, serious TEAEs, or TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation. Frequently reported TEAEs included dizziness, nystagmus, increased blood triglycerides, headache, and increased blood uric acid and creatine phosphokinase. Single-dose mirogabalin was rapidly absorbed (median time to maximum plasma concentration, 1.00 h) and eliminated (mean terminal elimination half-life, 2.57-3.08 h). The exposure was approximately dose-proportional. In the multiple-dose cohort, the trough plasma concentration increased dose-proportionally, and exposure and clearance were comparable to that following a single 15-mg dose. The mean cumulative amount excreted into urine up to 48 h post-dose increased in a dose-proportional manner, the mean cumulative percentage excreted into urine was 61.9%-74.3%, and renal clearance remained relatively constant.

CONCLUSION

Consistent with previous phase I studies in other populations, mirogabalin was safe and well tolerated in healthy Chinese participants at single and multiple doses of up to 15 mg twice-daily.

Mirogabalin for Central Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study in Asia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) commonly experience central neuropathic pain (CNeP), which is challenging to treat. Mirogabalin is effective for peripheral neuropathic pain, but evidence for CNeP is lacking.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study investigated mirogabalin efficacy and safety for the treatment of CNeP in patients with traumatic SCI. Adult patients from 120 sites throughout Japan, Korea, and Taiwan were randomized (1:1) to receive placebo or mirogabalin (5 mg twice daily [BID] for 1 week, 10 mg BID for 1 week, and 10 or 15 mg BID for 12 weeks). Patients with moderate renal impairment received half the dosage. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in the weekly average daily pain score (ADPS) at week 14. The secondary endpoints included ADPS responder rates, the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), average daily sleep interference score (ADSIS), and Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). Adverse events were monitored for safety.

RESULTS

Each treatment group comprised 150 patients. Mirogabalin elicited a statistical and clinically relevant improvement in change from baseline in the weekly ADPS at week 14 (least-squares mean difference [95% CI] vs placebo -0.71 [-1.08 to -0.34], p = 0.0001). Responder rates at week 14 were higher for mirogabalin than those for placebo (odds ratio [95% CI] 1.91 [1.11-3.27] for the ≥30% responder rate; 2.52 [1.11-5.71] for the ≥50% responder rate). Statistical improvements (i.e., least-squares mean difference [95% CI] vs placebo) were also observed in the SF-MPQ (-2.4 [-3.8 to -1.1]), ADSIS -0.71 (-1.04 to -0.38), and NPSI -7.7 (-11.1 to -4.4) scores. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild; no serious adverse drug reactions were reported.

DISCUSSION

Mirogabalin elicited clinically relevant decreases in pain and was well tolerated, suggesting that mirogabalin is a promising treatment for patients with CNeP due to SCI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03901352); first submitted April 3, 2019; first patient enrolled March 14, 2019; available at clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03901352.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class I evidence that in adult patients with CNeP due to traumatic SCI, mirogabalin, 10 or 15 mg BID, effectively improves weekly ADPS at week 14.

Multidisciplinary Advances Address the Challenges in Developing Drugs against Transient Receptor Potential Channels to Treat Metabolic Disorders

Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels are cation channels that regulate key physiological and pathological processes in response to a broad range of stimuli. Moreover, they systemically regulate the release of hormones, metabolic homeostasis, and complications of diabetes, which positions them as promising therapeutic targets to combat metabolic disorders. Nevertheless, there are significant challenges in the design of TRP ligands with high potency and durability. Herein we summarize the four challenges as hydrophobicity, selectivity, mono-target therapy, and interspecies discrepancy. We present 1134 TRP ligands with diversified modes of TRP-ligand interaction and provide a detailed discussion of the latest strategies, especially cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and computational methods. We propose solutions to address the challenges with a critical analysis of advances in membrane partitioning, polypharmacology, biased agonism, and biochemical screening of transcriptional modulators. They are fueled by the breakthrough from cryo-EM, chemoinformatics and bioinformatics. The discussion is aimed to shed new light on designing next-generation drugs to treat obesity, diabetes and its complications, with optimal hydrophobicity, higher mode selectivity, multi-targeting and consistent activities between human and rodents.

Renal tubular transporter-mediated interactions between mirogabalin and cimetidine in rats

Cimetidine at a clinical dosage decreased the renal clearance (CLr) of mirogabalin in humans by inhibition of renal secretion. Mirogabalin is a substrate of human OAT1/3, OCT2, MATE1 and/or MATE2-K. To clarify the mechanism behind the above interaction, it was investigated whether cimetidine inhibits the process of mirogabalin uptake at the basolateral side or the process of its efflux at the apical side in rat kidney in vivo.Cimetidine was administered to rats by a constant infusion to achieve an unbound plasma concentration of 7.0 μM and examine its effect on the renal disposition of [¹⁴C]metformin, [³H]p-aminohippuric acid (PAH), and [¹⁴C]mirogabalin.Cimetidine significantly induced the intrarenal accumulation of radioactivity (Kp, kidney) and decreased the renal clearance (CLr) of [¹⁴C]mirogabalin. These effects resulted in significantly decreased total clearance (CLt). Kp, kidney, and CLr of [¹⁴C]metformin, except CLt, were also affected, but no parameters of [³H]PAH were affected by cimetidine.These findings clarified that an unbound plasma concentration of cimetidine of 7.0 μM inhibited the apical efflux not the basolateral uptake of [¹⁴C]mirogabalin in rat kidney, suggesting that mirogabalin/cimetidine interaction was caused by inhibiting the apical efflux transporter, human MATE1 and/or MATE2-K, not the basolateral uptake transporter, human OCT2, in the kidney.

Relationship between the dose titration and adherence of mirogabalin in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain depending on renal function: a nationwide electronic medical record database study

BACKGROUND

Mirogabalin has been attracting attention for treating peripheral neuropathic pain. The package insert recommends that mirogabalin should be titrated depending on renal function. Here, we investigated the relationship between dose titration patterns and adherence, and persistence of mirogabalin treatment.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Peripheral neuropathic pain patients who initiated mirogabalin between March 2020 and May 2021 were identified using an electronic medical record database. The dose titration pattern was described according to degrees of renal function. Regression analyses were performed to compare adherence and persistence between the patients with and without titration.

RESULTS

Of the 4,138 identified patients, 1,696 (41.0%) titrated the dose within 45 days and were more adherent than those without titration (Adjusted odds ratio: 1.75, 95% CI 1.21, 2.54). Of the total 952 patients with renal function parameters, 229 (24.1%) titrated to the effective dose within 45 days and were less likely to discontinue than those without titration (Adjusted hazard ratio: 0.57, 95% CI 0.40, 0.81).

CONCLUSION

Mirogabalin dose titration was associated with better adherence and persistence. It is important for mirogabalin treatment to determine the initial prescription dose based on renal function and subsequent dose titration according to the package insert.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000047313.

The Novel Gabapentinoid Mirogabalin Prevents Upregulation of α2δ-1 Subunit of Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels in Spinal Dorsal Horn in a Rat Model of Spinal Nerve Ligation

Gabapentinoids are specific ligands for the α₂δ-1 subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels. This class of drugs, including gabapentin and pregabalin, exert various pharmacological effects and are widely used for the treatment of epilepsy, anxiety, and chronic pain. The mechanism of action of gabapentinoids involves both direct modulation of calcium channel kinetics and inhibition of channel trafficking and expression, which contribute to the above pharmacological effects. In the present study, we investigated the effects of mirogabalin, a novel potent gabapentinoid, on expression levels of the α₂δ-1 subunit in the spinal dorsal horn in a rat model of spinal nerve ligation (SNL) as an experimental animal model for peripheral neuropathic pain. The neuropathic pain state was induced by SNL in male Sprague - Dawley rats. After the development of mechanical hypersensitivity, the animals received 10 mg/kg mirogabalin or vehicle orally for 5 consecutive days and were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis of α₂δ-1 subunit expression in the spinal cord. In the SNL model rats, expression of the α₂δ-1 subunit significantly increased in the spinal dorsal horn at the ipsilateral side of nerve injury, while mirogabalin inhibited this increase. In conclusion, the α₂δ-1 subunit was upregulated in the spinal dorsal horn of SNL model rats, and repeated administration of mirogabalin inhibited this upregulation. The inhibitory effect of mirogabalin on upregulation of the α₂δ-1 subunit after nerve injury is considered to contribute to its analgesic effects in peripheral neuropathic pain.

The Clinical Application and Progress of Mirogabalin on Neuropathic Pain as a Novel Selective Gabapentinoids

Background

Neuropathic pain is a complex sort of pain that is detrimental to individuals' health, both physically and mentally, but merely a small portion of them could witness pain alleviation. Mirogabalin, by distinctive binding characteristics of voltage-gated calcium channels, has won approval from the Japanese authority as a third member of gabapentinoids in Japan. Our review was aimed at encompassing the bulk of clinical research on mirogabalin, which included clinical trials, special considerations, coadministration studies, case reports, and cost-effectiveness studies.

Methods

A review was carried out on a series of platforms, such as PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus, up to December 2021 using the keywords as follows: "mirogabalin OR mirogabalin besylate OR Tarlige OR DS-5565" AND "neuropathic pain OR Neuropathy."

Results

Mirogabalin demonstrated analgesic activity and manageable adverse reactions and provides a new alternative for individuals with PHN or DPNP in 3 phase II and 4 III trials. Mirogabalin alleviated pain markedly in comparison with placebo. Administration of mirogabalin on a long-term basis is a flexible dosage regimen for patients with PHN. It is noteworthy that mirogabalin should be administrated cautiously when combined with probenecid and cimetidine on account of a slight increase in pharmacodynamics effects of mirogabalin.

Conclusion

The development of mirogabalin allows further optimization of individual treatment strategies so as to provide more therapeutic choices in this medical domain.

Efficacy and Safety of Add-on Mirogabalin to NSAIDs in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Randomized, Open-Label Study

INTRODUCTION

In Japan, conservative therapy for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), prostaglandin E1, tramadol, physical/exercise therapy, and nerve blocks. Mirogabalin, a selective oral α2δ ligand, is approved for treating peripheral neuropathic pain, though data regarding visual analog scores (VAS) for pain in patients with LSS are limited. We investigated the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin as an add-on treatment in patients with LSS taking NSAIDs compared with patients taking NSAIDs only.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, open-label study (MiroTAS) was conducted at 32 centers in Japan between June 2020 and October 2021. Patients were randomly assigned to mirogabalin and NSAIDs or NSAIDs alone in a 1:1 ratio. NSAIDs were administered according to their Japanese package inserts; mirogabalin was administered based on renal function [creatinine clearance (CrCL) ≥ 60 mL/min, 5 mg twice daily (BID) in Weeks 1-2, 10 mg BID in Weeks 3-4, and 15 or 10 mg BID after Week 5; CrCL 30 to < 60 mL/min, 2.5 mg BID Weeks 1-2, 5 mg BID Weeks 3-4, and 7.5 or 5 mg BID after Week 5]. The primary endpoint was the change in VAS score for leg pain from baseline to Week 12. Secondary endpoints were quality of life, evaluated using the EuroQol five-dimensional descriptive system (EQ-5D-5L) (at baseline and Week 12) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) (at Week 12), and safety. Change in VAS score at Week 12 was calculated using a linear mixed model for repeated measures. The safety endpoints were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse drug reactions.

RESULTS

In total, 220 patients who met the eligibility criteria were enrolled. In the mirogabalin and NSAIDs and NSAIDs groups, mean ages (67.8 vs. 70.9 years), proportions of female patients (54.5% vs. 49.0%), mean body weights (63.9 vs. 62.0 kg), mean CrCL values (81.5 vs. 70.7 mL/min), proportions of patients with CrCL 30 to < 60 mL/min (27.3% vs. 33.7%), mean VAS scores (63.8 vs. 62.8 mm), and proportions of patients with VAS score ≥ 60 (53.6% vs. 52.9%) at enrollment were similar. The median durations of LSS were 9.0 and 11.0 months and the spine pain DETECT questionnaire (SPDQ) scores were 6.8 and 7.8, respectively. The least square (LS) mean change in VAS score from baseline to Week 12 was - 24.1 mm in the mirogabalin and NSAIDs group and - 14.2 mm in the NSAIDs group (both P < 0.0001 vs. baseline). The difference in LS mean was - 9.9 [95% confidence interval (CI), - 18.0, - 1.8] (P = 0.0174). The improvement in EQ-5D-5L score at Week 12 was significantly greater in the mirogabalin and NSAIDs group versus the NSAIDs group [mean difference, 0.0529 (95% CI, 0.0036, 0.1022), P = 0.0357]. At Week 12, the proportions of patients with PGIC scores ≤ 3 and ≤ 2 were higher in the mirogabalin and NSAIDs group vs. the NSAIDs group (76.2% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.0006, and 47.6% vs. 32.4%, P = 0.0523). In the mirogabalin and NSAIDs group, the incidences of TEAEs and adverse drug reactions were 60.9% and 57.3%, respectively, and the most common TEAEs were somnolence (30.0%) and dizziness (25.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of mirogabalin to NSAIDs improved VAS, EQ-5D-5L, and PGIC. The main TEAEs were somnolence and dizziness. The addition of mirogabalin to NSAIDs improved peripheral neuropathic pain associated with LSS and raised no new safety concerns.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs021200007).

Mirogabalin, a novel α2δ ligand, is not a substrate of LAT1, but of PEPT1, PEPT2, OAT1, OAT3, OCT2, MATE1 and MATE2-K

Mirogabalin is a α₂δ ligand as well as pregabalin. The aim of this study was to clarify whether mirogabalin is a substrate of human LAT1, which involved in absorption and disposition of pregabalin, and to investigate transporters involved in renal secretion and absorption of mirogabalin using transporter-expressing cells and fresh human kidney slices.We employed uptake assay of [³H]mirogabalin by HEK293T or HEK293 cells transiently overexpress human OAT1, OAT3, OCT2, LAT1/4F2hc, LAT2/4F2hc, PEPT1, and PEPT2 proteins. Transport assay of MDCKII cells transiently overexpress OCT2/MATE1, and OCT2/MATE2-K proteins was conducted. Contribution of transporters to renal secretion was investigated by uptake assay using human kidney slices.Uptake clearances of [³H]mirogabalin by OAT1-, OAT3-, OCT2-, PEPT1-, and PEPT2-expressing cells were higher than that by vector cells, but by LAT1/4F2hc and LAT2/4F2hc-expressing cells were not. In transport assay using OCT2/MATE1 and OCT2/MATE2-K cells, [³H]mirogabalin showed directional transport from basolateral to apical side. Contribution of OAT1, OAT3, and OCT2 was observed by uptake of [³H]mirogabalin into the kidney slices.These results indicate that mirogabalin is not a substrate of LAT1, but of PEPT1 and PEPT2 involved in absorption and of OAT1, OAT3, OCT2, MATE1 and/or MATE2-K involved in its urinary secretion.

Symptom-based pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain related to spinal disorders: results from a patient-based assessment

Existing guidelines advocate an updated therapeutic algorithm for chronic neuropathic pain (NeP), but pharmacotherapeutic management should be individualized to pain phenotypes to achieve higher efficacy. This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of medications, based on NeP phenotypes, and to propose symptom-based pharmacotherapy. This retrospective study was enrolled 265 outpatients with chronic NeP related to spinal disorders. The patients were classified into three groups: spinal cord-related pain, radicular pain, and cauda equina syndrome. Data were obtained from patient-based questionnaires using Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) and the Brief Scale for Psychiatric Problems in Orthopaedic Patients, and from clinical information. The proportions of patients with ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% reduction in NPSI score for each pain subtype (spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dysesthesia) and drugs were evaluated. The pain reduction rate was significantly lower in patients with spinal cord-related pain, especially for paresthesia/dysesthesia. For spinal cord-related pain, duloxetine and neurotropin had insufficient analgesic effects, whereas mirogabalin was the most effective. Pregabalin or mirogabalin for radicular pain and duloxetine for cauda equina syndrome are recommended in cases of insufficient analgesic effects with neurotropin. The findings could contribute to better strategies for symptom-based pharmacotherapeutic management.

The Last Decade Publications on Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Bibliometric Analysis

Background

Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) is a usual complication of diabetes with a high incidence and mortality. Many diabetes-related studies have been published in various journals. However, bibliometrics and visual analyses in the domain of DPNP research are still lacking. The study aimed to offer a visual method to observe the systematic overview of global research in this field from 2011 to 2021.

Methods

The publications from the Science Citation Index Expanded in Web of Science (WOS) in the past 11 years (from 2011 to 2021) were collected and sorted out, and those related to DPNP were extracted and analyzed. The article language was limited in English. Then, CiteSpace V was used for the bibliometric analysis of the extracted literature.

Results

A total of 1,422 articles met the inclusion criteria. A continuous but unstable growth in the amounts of papers published on DPNP was observed over the last 11 years. The subject sort of the 1,422 papers mainly concentrates on Endocrinology Metabolism, Clinical neurology and Neurosciences from the WOS. According to the research contribution in the field of DPNP, the United States occupies a leading position, with the highest amounts of publications, citations, open access, and the H- index.

Conclusion

This study provides a visual analysis method for the trend of DPNP, and offers some hidden serviceable information that may define new directions for future research.

Drug treatment for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a lethal disease where most tumors are too advanced at diagnosis for resection, leaving chemotherapy as the mainstay of treatment. Although the prognosis of unresectable PC is poor, it has been dramatically improved by new chemotherapy treatments, such as the combination of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. However, as oxaliplatin and paclitaxel are common neurotoxic drugs, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common and severe adverse effect of both treatments. As there are no agents recommended in the ASCO guidelines, we review the methods used to treat CIPN caused by PC treatment. The efficacy of duloxetine was observed in a large randomized controlled trial (RCT). In addition, pregabalin was more effective than duloxetine for CIPN in two RCTs. Although duloxetine and pregabalin can be effective for CIPN, they have several side effects. Therefore, the choice between the two drugs should be determined according to effect and tolerability. Mirogabalin is also used in patients with PC and there is hope it will yield positive outcomes when treating CIPN in the future.

A systematic review of the prevalence, risk factors and screening tools for autonomic and diabetic peripheral neuropathy in children, adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes

AIMS

We aimed to estimate the prevalence of Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and Cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) in youth with type 1 diabetes; identify key risk factors; identify the most useful tests for the diagnostic evaluation of DPN and CAN; identify key treatment options for DPN and CAN.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed including studies published in the last 15 years. PICO framework was used in the selection process and evidence was assessed using the GRADE system.

RESULTS

A total of 758 studies were identified and a final number of 49 studies were included in this systematic review. According to moderate-high level quality studies, the prevalence of probable DPN, ranged between 13.5 and 62%; subclinical DPN between 22 and 88%; confirmed DPN between 2.6 and 11%. The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument was the tool with higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting DPN, which needs to be confirmed by nerve conduction velocity. The prevalence of CAN was 4-39%. Specific treatment options for DPN or CAN in patients younger than 25 years are not available. Key risk factors for DPN and CAN are hyperglycemia/HbA1c, age, diabetes duration, the presence of other microvascular complications, waist/height ratio, lipid profile and blood pressure. For CAN, additional risk factors were cigarette smoking, BMI and total daily insulin.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of neuropathy in youth with type 1 diabetes varies depending on different screening methods and characteristics of the study populations. However, the assessed studies confirmed a relatively high prevalence of subclinical neuropathy, reiterating the importance of early identification of risk factors to prevent this complication.

A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of the pharmacotherapeutic options for painful diabetic neuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a high incidence and severe complication of diabetes mellitus, significantly compromising patients' quality of life and causing tremendous economic burden. Considering drug costs becomes part of treatment decisions, with the growing choice of monotherapy or combination treatment strategies for PDN treatment.

AREAS COVERED

This systematic review aims to identify the cost-effectiveness of pharmacotherapies in PDN, summarize key findings, and assess the quality of studies to inform healthcare resource allocation decisions and future research. Economic evaluations were identified by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and health technology assessment (HTA) databases, as well as screening reference lists of previously identified studies. Relevant data was extracted, and the CHEERS checklist was used to assess the quality of the studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Collectively, the findings indicate that more pharmacoeconomics research is urgently needed to directly compare high-quality research for PDN combination medication/sequential treatment, and which is performed from a societal perspective. Simultaneously, to strengthen the reliability of the analysis, metrics such as adherence, incidence of adverse drug reactions, and pain levels utility value should be examined to verify the robustness of the basic results.

The Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (painful-DPN) is a highly prevalent and disabling condition, affecting up to one-third of patients with diabetes. This condition can have a profound impact resulting in a poor quality of life, disruption of employment, impaired sleep, and poor mental health with an excess of depression and anxiety. The management of painful-DPN poses a great challenge. Unfortunately, currently there are no Food and Drug Administration (USA) approved disease-modifying treatments for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) as trials of putative pathogenetic treatments have failed at phase 3 clinical trial stage. Therefore, the focus of managing painful- DPN other than improving glycaemic control and cardiovascular risk factor modification is treating symptoms. The recommended treatments based on expert international consensus for painful- DPN have remained essentially unchanged for the last decade. Both the serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SNRI) duloxetine and α2δ ligand pregabalin have the most robust evidence for treating painful-DPN. The weak opioids (e.g. tapentadol and tramadol, both of which have an SNRI effect), tricyclic antidepressants such as amitriptyline and α2δ ligand gabapentin are also widely recommended and prescribed agents. Opioids (except tramadol and tapentadol), should be prescribed with caution in view of the lack of definitive data surrounding efficacy, concerns surrounding addiction and adverse events. Recently, emerging therapies have gained local licenses, including the α2δ ligand mirogabalin (Japan) and the high dose 8% capsaicin patch (FDA and Europe). The management of refractory painful-DPN is difficult; specialist pain services may offer off-label therapies (e.g. botulinum toxin, intravenous lidocaine and spinal cord stimulation), although there is limited clinical trial evidence supporting their use. Additionally, despite combination therapy being commonly used clinically, there is little evidence supporting this practise. There is a need for further clinical trials to assess novel therapeutic agents, optimal combination therapy and existing agents to determine which are the most effective for the treatment of painful-DPN. This article reviews the evidence for the treatment of painful-DPN, including emerging treatment strategies such as novel compounds and stratification of patients according to individual characteristics (e.g. pain phenotype, neuroimaging and genotype) to improve treatment responses.

Pharmacotherapy of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Clinical Update

The rising prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) leads on to an increase in chronic diabetic complications. Diabetic peripheral neuropathies (DPNs) are common chronic complications of diabetes. Distal symmetric polyneuropathy is the most prevalent form. Most patients with DPN will remain pain-free; however, painful DPN (PDPN) occurs in 6-34% of all DM patients and is associated with reduced health-related-quality-of-life and substantial economic burden. Symptomatic treatment of PDPN and diabetic autonomic neuropathy is the key treatment goals. Using certain patient related characteristics, subjects with PDPN can be stratified and assigned targeted therapies to produce better pain outcomes. The aim of this review is to discuss the various pathogenetic mechanisms of DPN with special reference to the mechanisms leading to PDPN and the various pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies available for its management. Recommended pharmacological therapies include anticonvulsants, antidepressants, opioid analgesics, and topical medications.

Mirogabalin as a Novel Gabapentinoid for the Treatment of Chronic Pain Conditions: An Analysis of Current Evidence

: Neuropathic pain is a challenge for physicians to treat and often requires a multimodal approach with both pharmacologic and lifestyle interventions. Mirogabalin, a potent, selective ligand of the α2δ-1 and α2δ-2 subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs), provides analgesia by inhibiting neurotransmitter release at the presynaptic end of the neuron. Mirogabalin offers more sustained analgesia than its gabapentinoid counterparts in addition to a wider safety margin for adverse events. Recent clinical trials of mirogabalin have demonstrated both efficacy and tolerability of the drug for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain and postherpetic neuralgia, leading to its approval in Japan. While still not yet FDA approved, mirogabalin is still in its infancy and offers potential into the treatment of neuropathic pain and its associated comorbidities.

A large-scale database study for the prescription status of a new voltage-gated Ca2+ channel α2δ ligand, mirogabalin, in Japan

BACKGROUND

A new voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channel α₂δ ligand, mirogabalin, was first approved for treating peripheral neuropathic pain in Japan in 2019. This is the first report on the prescription status of mirogabalin using a large-scale prescription database.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The authors analyzed the prescription data of 12,924 patients prescribed mirogabalin between 1 June and 31 August 2020. The endpoints were the number of patients prescribed, prescription days, prescription doses, dose changes, co-prescription patterns, medication possession ratio (MPR), and treatment discontinuation rates (TDRs).

RESULTS

Mirogabalin was newly prescribed to 7,914 patients in the 3-month study period. Most patients were prescribed mirogabalin at about 10 mg/day during the study period, and 30.9% of patients were prescribed ≥ 20 mg/day on Day 90 after the first prescription. The most frequently prescribed concomitant drug was celecoxib. The MPR (80 to 110%) was 86.2%, indicating good treatment adherence. The cumulative TDRs during ≤ 7 Days, Days 31-60, and 61-90 were 14.0%, 70.0%, and 77.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Mirogabalin was prescribed to a considerable number of patients. These results may be useful for optimizing mirogabalin use for patients with peripheral neuropathic pain in daily clinical practice.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000042592.

Mirogabalin vs pregabalin for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in pancreatic cancer patients

Background

The prognosis of pancreatic cancer (PC) has been improved by new chemotherapy regimens (combination of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP)). Unfortunately, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common adverse event of these two regimens. The efficacy of pregabalin for CIPN has been reported in previous studies. However, the efficacy of mirogabalin for CIPN remains unknown. Thus, in this study, we aimed to clarify which drug (mirogabalin or pregabalin) was more valuable for improving CIPN.

Methods

A total of 163 PC patients who underwent FOLFIRINOX or GnP between May 2014 and January 2021 were enrolled. Among them, 34 patients were diagnosed with CIPN. Thirteen patients were treated with mirogabalin (mirogabalin group), and twenty-one patients were treated with pregabalin (pregabalin group). Treatment efficacy was compared between the two groups.

Results

In both the mirogabalin group and the pregabalin group, the grade of patients with CIPN at 2, 4, and 6 weeks after the initiation of treatment showed significant improvement compared to the pretreatment grade. Notably, the rate of CIPN improvement was higher in the mirogabalin group than in the pregabalin group (2 weeks: 84.6% (11/13) vs 33.3% (7/21), P value = 0.005; 4 weeks, 6 weeks: 92.3% (12/13) vs 33.3% (7/21), P value = 0.001).

Conclusions

Although both mirogabalin and pregabalin were effective at improving CIPN, mirogabalin might be a suitable first choice for CIPN in PC patients.

Trial registration

Not applicable

Analgesic characteristics of a newly developed α2δ ligand, mirogabalin, on inflammatory pain

Mirogabalin is a novel α₂δ ligand approved in Japan for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain. However, the sites of action of α₂δ ligands to produce analgesic effects on inflammatory pain remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the analgesic effect and site of action of mirogabalin using the rat formalin test, an acute inflammatory pain model. Mirogabalin was administered orally, intrathecally, and intracerebroventricularly. Open field tests were performed to evaluate the effect of oral-, intrathecally, and intracerebroventricularly administered mirogabalin on locomotor activity and orientation ability. Oral mirogabalin produced an analgesic effect when the formalin test was performed 4 h, but not 1 or 2 h, after oral administration. Intrathecal, but not intracerebroventricular, administration of mirogabalin produced analgesic effects when mirogabalin was administered 10 min before formalin injection. These analgesic effects were not antagonized by idazoxan, an α2 adrenergic antagonist; WAY100135, a 5-HT_1A antagonist; or naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist. Mirogabalin attenuated moving distances 1 and 2 h after oral administration and 10 min after intracerebroventricular administration, but not 10 min after intrathecal administration. In the oral administration group, the time course of the analgesic effect was different from that of moving distance. In the intracerebroventricular group, mirogabalin attenuated moving distances but did not produce an analgesic effect. In the intrathecal group, mirogabalin produced an analgesic effect but did not affect moving distances. These findings suggest that the analgesic effect of mirogabalin on the rat formalin test is mediated by spinal action and not by the activation of α2, 5-HT_1A, or opioid receptors, and that the inhibitory effect of mirogabalin on moving distances is mediated by the supraspinal brain.

Mirogabalin treatment of postoperative neuropathic pain after thoracic surgery: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, interventional trial

Background

Intercostal nerve damage due to thoracotomy or thoracoscopic manipulation is a major contributor to chronic postsurgical pain after pulmonary resection. Chronic postsurgical pain may last for months or years and can negatively impair physical functioning and daily activities. Global consensus on severe postoperative pain management is lacking, and chronic pain incidence after thoracic surgery remains high. Many patients report neuropathic pain, which can be difficult to treat with currently available therapies. The efficacy and safety of mirogabalin have been demonstrated for other types of neuropathic pain; thus, this study was planned to investigate the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin to treat neuropathic pain after thoracic surgery.

Methods

In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, interventional study, patients who are diagnosed with neuropathic pain following removal of a chest drain after lung resection will receive conventional therapy (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and/or acetaminophen) with or without the addition of a clinical dose of mirogabalin for 8 weeks. For patient stratification, a visual analog scale pain intensity score at baseline of <60 vs. ≥60 mm will be used. Treatment efficacy and safety with and without the addition of mirogabalin will be assessed using a questionnaire evaluating postoperative changes in pain severity and activity. The primary study endpoint is the change in pain intensity from baseline to Week 8, measured by the visual analog scale. Additionally, the presence of chronic pain at 12 weeks after enrollment in each treatment group will be recorded.

Discussion

This protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Clinical Research Review Board of Nagasaki University. Study data will be published in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials database and peer-reviewed journals. Mirogabalin is already approved for the treatment of other types of neuropathic pain. It is anticipated that this study will provide data to elucidate the impact of mirogabalin treatment, in combination with conventional therapy, to benefit patients with neuropathic pain following thoracic surgery.

Trial Registration

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCTs071200053.

Different Drugs for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Meta-Analysis

Objective: To systematically evaluate the effects of different drugs for the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Methods: All literature from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials published over the past 12 years (from January 1, 2008 to June 1, 2020) was searched, and two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility, continuous data extraction, independent assessment of bias risk, and graded strength of evidence. The pain score was used as the main result, and 30 and 50% pain reduction and adverse events were used as secondary results.

Results: A total of 37 studies were included. Pregabalin, duloxetine, tapentadol, lacosamide, mirogabalin, and capsaicin were all more effective than placebo in alleviating the pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy, while ABT-894 and gabapentin showed no significant effect. In addition, the efficacy of buprenorphine, tanezumab, fulranumab and others could not be concluded due to insufficient studies.

Conclusion: Pregabalin and duloxetine showed good therapeutic effects on painful DPN, but adverse events were also significant. The analgesic effects of ABT-894 and gabapentin need to be further studied with longer and larger RCTs. As an opioid drug, tapentadol has a good analgesic effect, but due to its addiction, it needs to be very cautious in clinical use. Although lacosamide, mirogabalin, and capsaicin are more effective than placebo, the therapeutic effect is weaker than pregabalin. For the results of our meta-analysis, long-term studies are still needed to verify their efficacy and safety in the future.

Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42020197397.

Management of diabetic neuropathy

Diabetic neuropathy is a neurodegenerative disorder that may alter both the somatic and autonomic peripheral nervous systems in the context of diabetes mellitus (DM). It is a prevalent and burdensome chronic complication of DM, that requires timely management. Optimized glycemic control (mainly for type 1 DM), multifactorial intervention (mainly for type 2 DM), with lifestyle intervention/physical exercise, and weight loss represent the basis of management for diabetic distal symmetrical polyneuropathy, and should be implemented early in the disease course. Despite better understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms of diabetic peripheral neuropathy, there is still a stringent need for more pathogenetic-based agents that would significantly modify the natural history of the disease. The paper reviews the available drugs and current recommendations for the management of distal symmetrical polyneuropathy, including pain management, and for diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Evaluation of drug combinations that would perhaps be more efficient in slowing the progression of the disease or even reversing it, and that would provide a better pain management is still needed.

A review of a new voltage-gated Ca2+ channel α2δ ligand, mirogabalin, for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain

INTRODUCTION

Neuropathic pain (NeP) is a chronic and refractory condition in many patients, and its treatment is a challenge for physicians. A new voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channel α₂δ ligand, mirogabalin, has a high specific binding affinity for the α₂δ subunit, with a slower dissociation rate for α₂δ-1 than α₂δ-2 compared to that of pregabalin. Mirogabalin was shown to be effective in NeP animal models, with a margin of safety between central nervous system side effects and the analgesic effect of the dose. It exerted a favorable analgesic effect, was well tolerated in patients with peripheral NeP (P-NeP), and was first approved in Japan in 2019 and subsequently in Korea and Taiwan in 2020.

AREAS COVERED

The purpose of this article is to review the pharmacological characteristics, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy and safety of mirogabalin for NeP based on the results of non-clinical and clinical studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Although there are several first-line therapies for NeP, insufficient efficacy and adverse drug reactions of NeP drugs often cause patient dissatisfaction. Mirogabalin was effective and well tolerated with a step-wise dose increase in clinical studies on P-NeP patients. Thus, mirogabalin is expected to be a useful treatment option for patients with P-NeP.

Pathogenesis, diagnosis and clinical management of diabetic sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy

Diabetic sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy (DSPN) is a serious complication of diabetes mellitus and is associated with increased mortality, lower-limb amputations and distressing painful neuropathic symptoms (painful DSPN). Our understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease has largely been derived from animal models, which have identified key potential mechanisms. However, effective therapies in preclinical models have not translated into clinical trials and we have no universally accepted disease-modifying treatments. Moreover, the condition is generally diagnosed late when irreversible nerve damage has already taken place. Innovative point-of-care devices have great potential to enable the early diagnosis of DSPN when the condition might be more amenable to treatment. The management of painful DSPN remains less than optimal; however, studies suggest that a mechanism-based approach might offer an enhanced benefit in certain pain phenotypes. The management of patients with DSPN involves the control of individualized cardiometabolic targets, a multidisciplinary approach aimed at the prevention and management of foot complications, and the timely diagnosis and management of neuropathic pain. Here, we discuss the latest advances in the mechanisms of DSPN and painful DSPN, originating both from the periphery and the central nervous system, as well as the emerging diagnostics and treatments.

Safety and Efficacy of Mirogabalin for Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: Pooled Analysis of Two Pivotal Phase III Studies

PURPOSE

Mirogabalin besylate has been approved in several countries to treat peripheral neuropathic pain. This pooled analysis, using data from the two pivotal Phase III studies in Asian patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain and post-herpetic neuralgia, aimed to provide clinicians with more detailed and precise information relating to mirogabalin's safety and efficacy.

METHODS

Data were pooled from 2 multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 14-week treatment studies of mirogabalin conducted at ∼350 study sites (Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand). Eligible patients in both studies were randomized in a 2:1:1:1 ratio, stratified according to a baseline average daily pain score (ADPS) of <6 or ≥6, to placebo, mirogabalin 15-mg once daily (QD), mirogabalin 10-mg twice daily (BID), or mirogabalin 15-mg BID treatment groups. Safety was assessed based on treatment-emergent adverse events identified from the adverse events collected throughout both studies. The primary efficacy end point of both studies was the change from baseline in ADPS at week 14.

FINDINGS

In total, 1587 patients (824 with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain; 763 with post-herpetic neuralgia) who received at least 1 dose of study drug were analyzed (633 received placebo, 954 treated with mirogabalin). Treatment-emergent adverse events included somnolence (3.8%, 10.8%, 14.5%, and 19.1%) and dizziness (2.7%, 5.7%, 9.1%, and 13.1%) in patients receiving placebo, mirogabalin 15 mg QD, mirogabalin 10 mg BID, and mirogabalin 15 mg BID, respectively. In patients treated with mirogabalin 15 mg QD, 2 (0.6%) of 316 patients discontinued due to somnolence. In the mirogabalin 10-mg BID group, somnolence, edema, and peripheral edema each resulted in 3 (0.9%) of 318 patient discontinuations. In the mirogabalin 15-mg BID group, 6 (1.9%) of 320 patients discontinued due to dizziness and 3 (0.9%) due to somnolence. At week 14, mirogabalin 10 mg BID and 15 mg BID statistically significantly improved ADPS versus placebo, with least squares mean changes (95% CI) of -0.31 (-0.55, -0.08) and -0.63 (-0.86, -0.40). Post hoc analysis showed a statistically significant difference 2 days after administration in the mirogabalin 10-mg and 15-mg BID groups compared with placebo. Female sex, age ≥65 years, and baseline weight <60 kg may influence the safety of mirogabalin, particularly regarding the incidence of somnolence and dizziness, but had no notable impact on efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02318706 and NCT02318719.

IMPLICATIONS

This pooled analysis showed that mirogabalin was efficacious and well-tolerated by Asian patients with peripheral neuropathic pain.

Efficacy and safety of mirogabalin treatment in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

AIM

We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP).

METHODS

We searched four databases from inception to 1st July 2020. We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which assessed the effectiveness and safety of mirogabalin in patients with DPNP. We evaluated the quality of the included RCTs using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. We pooled dichotomous outcomes as risk ratios and continuous outcomes as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals, both under the random- or fixed-effects model.

RESULTS

Three RCTs matched our inclusion criteria with a total of 1732 patients with DPNP: 1057, 534 and 141 patients received mirogabalin, placebo and pregabalin, respectively. The quality of included RCTs was marked as moderate-to-high. Mirogabalin treatment was significantly associated with a significant reduction in the average daily pain score (ADPS) compared with placebo over 7 weeks. Compared with pregabalin, mirogabalin was significantly associated with more decrease in ADPS only after 3, 4 and 5 weeks. The proportion of patients with ≥30% and ≥50% reduction in the ADPS was significantly higher in the mirogabalin vs placebo and pregabalin groups. Compared with placebo, mirogabalin was significantly associated with more adverse events of dizziness, increased weight, peripheral oedema and somnolence. The safety profile was comparable between mirogabalin and pregabalin.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that in patients with DPNP, mirogabalin treatment was superior to placebo and pregabalin in decreasing the ADPS over time. Besides, mirogabalin was largely safe and associated with some adverse events that could be managed conservatively.