HiSCR (Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response): a novel clinical endpoint to evaluate therapeutic outcomes in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa from the placebo-controlled portion of a phase 2 adalimumab study

Insights into the Window of Opportunity and Outcome Measures in Patients with Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa Treated with Secukinumab: A Real-World Study

INTRODUCION

The concept of a window of opportunity in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) management suggests that early initiation of biological therapy leads to better outcomes, though its timing remains uncertain.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational multicenter study, including consecutive patients with moderate to severe HS who initiated secukinumab treatment following prior failure with systemic antibiotics or adalimumab. Therapeutic burden was defined as the sum of previous systemic treatment cycles and previous major surgical interventions for HS. Patients were followed up for 24 weeks. Main outcomes were safety and effectiveness, assessed through the proportion of patients achieving HS Clinical Response (HiSCR) and a 55% reduction in International HS Severity Score System (IHS4-55). Additionally, potential predictors of response to secukinumab were studied. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients (33 men, 34 women) were included, with a mean age of 41.55 (11.94) years and a mean baseline IHS4 of 17.88 (11.13). The mean therapeutic burden was 6.06 (3.49). At week 24, 10.45% (7/67) of patients experienced adverse events, with three leading to treatment discontinuation. At week 24, 41.79% (28/67) of patients achieved HiSCR, and 44.78% (30/67) of patients achieved IHS4-55. HiSCR could not be calculated in 12 patients with a baseline AN count < 3. A lower therapeutic burden was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of achieving HiSCR and IHS4-55 at week 24.

CONCLUSIONS

Secukinumab showed safety and efficacy in real-world patients with HS, and the inverse correlation found between therapeutic burden and treatment response supports the concept of a window of opportunity, offering insights into its timing.

Efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (BE HEARD I and BE HEARD II): two 48-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 3 trials

BACKGROUND

Patients with hidradenitis suppurativa have substantial unmet clinical needs and scarce therapeutic options. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab, a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F and IL-17A, in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa.

METHODS

BE HEARD I and II were two identically designed, 48-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 3 trials. Patients aged 18 years or older with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa were randomly assigned 2:2:2:1 using interactive response technology (stratified by worst Hurley Stage at baseline and baseline systemic antibiotic use) to receive subcutaneous bimekizumab 320 mg every 2 weeks; bimekizumab 320 mg every 2 weeks to week 16, then every 4 weeks to week 48; bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks to week 48; or placebo to week 16, then bimekizumab 320 mg every 2 weeks. The primary outcome was an hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response of at least 50%, defined as a reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule count of at least 50% from baseline with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining tunnel count (HiSCR50) at week 16. Efficacy analyses included all randomly assigned study patients (intention-to-treat population). Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one full or partial dose of study treatment in the safety set, and of bimekizumab in the active-medication set. These trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04242446 and NCT04242498, and both are completed.

FINDINGS

Patients for BE HEARD I were recruited from Feb 19, 2020, to Oct 27, 2021, and 505 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. Patients for BE HEARD II were recruited from March 2, 2020, to July 28, 2021, and 509 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. The primary outcome at week 16 was met in the group who received bimekizumab every 2 weeks using modified non-responder imputation; higher responder rates were observed with bimekizumab versus placebo in both trials: 138 (48%) of 289 patients versus 21 (29%) of 72 patients in BE HEARD I (odds ratio [OR] 2·23 [97·5% CI 1·16-4·31]; p=0·0060) and 151 (52%) of 291 patients versus 24 (32%) of 74 patients in BE HEARD II (2·29 [1·22-4·29]; p=0·0032). In BE HEARD II, HiSCR50 was also met in the group who were administered bimekizumab every 4 weeks (77 [54%] of 144 vs 24 [32%] of 74 with placebo; 2·42 [1·22-4·80]; p=0·0038). Responses were maintained or increased to week 48. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 40 (8%) patients in BE HEARD I and in 24 (5%) patients in BE HEARD II treated with bimekizumab over 48 weeks. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events to week 48 were hidradenitis in both trials, in addition to coronavirus infection and diarrhoea in BE HEARD I, and oral candidiasis and headache in BE HEARD II. One death was reported across the two trials, and was due to congestive heart failure in a patient with substantial cardiovascular history treated with bimekizumab every 2 weeks in BE HEARD I (considered unrelated to bimekizumab treatment by the investigator). No new safety signals were observed.

INTERPRETATION

Bimekizumab was well tolerated by patients with hidradenitis suppurativa and produced rapid and deep clinically meaningful responses that were maintained up to 48 weeks. Data from these two trials support the use of bimekizumab for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa.

FUNDING

UCB Pharma.

Surgical Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory disease of the skin, characterized by recurrent draining sinuses and abscesses, predominantly in skin folds carrying terminal hairs and apocrine glands. Treatment for this debilitating disease has been medical management with antibiotics and immune modulators. With the advent of better reconstructive surgical techniques, the role of surgery in the treatment of HS has expanded, from being a last resort to a modality that is deployed earlier. Larger defects can be more easily reconstructed, allowing for a more radical excision of diseased areas. Locoregional flaps, perforator flaps, and propeller flaps that use the fasciocutaneous tissue allow reconstruction of defects with similar tissue, and provide better cosmetic and functional outcomes. They are easy to execute and can be performed even in resource-poor settings with concurrent use of immune modulators and postoperative antibiotics. Hidradenitis can be successfully treated with surgery in early stages as well as severe disease, due to the advances in understanding disease behavior, multidisciplinary care, and advanced reconstructive techniques. Coupled with a multidisciplinary care team, surgery offers a durable, lasting cure for HS, significantly reducing disease morbidity.

S2k‐Leitlinie zur Therapie der Hidradenitis suppurativa/Acne inversa – Kurzfassung

Die S2k‐Leitlinie der Hidradenitis suppurativa/Acne inversa (HS/AI) soll eine akzeptierte Entscheidungshilfe für die Auswahl/Durchführung einer geeigneten/suffizienten Therapie liefern. Hidradenitis suppurativa/Acne inversa ist eine chronisch‐rezidivierende, entzündliche, potenziell mutilierende Hauterkrankung des terminalen Haartalgdrüsenapparats, mit schmerzhaften, entzündlichen Läsionen in den apokrinen drüsenreichen Körperregionen. Ihre Punktprävalenz in Deutschland ist 0,3%, sie wird mit einer Verspätung von 10,0 ± 9,6 Jahren diagnostiziert. Abnormale Differenzierung der Keratinozyten des Haartalgdrüsenapparats und eine begleitende Entzündung bilden die zentrale pathogenetische Grundlage. Primäre HS/AI‐Läsionen sind entzündliche Knoten, Abszesse und drainierende Tunnel. Rezidive in den letzten 6 Monaten mit mindestens zwei Läsionen an den Prädilektionsstellen verweisen auf eine HS/AI mit einer 97‐prozentigen Genauigkeit. HS/AI‐Patienten leiden an einer deutlichen Einschränkung der Lebensqualität. Zur korrekten Therapieentscheidung sollen Klassifikation und Aktivitätsbewertung mit einem validierten Instrument erfolgen, wie dem International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System (IHS4). Hidradenitis suppurativa/Acne inversa wird nach der Ausprägung der nachweisbaren Entzündung in zwei Formen eingeteilt: aktive, entzündliche (milde, mittelschwere und schwere nach IHS4) und vorwiegend inaktive, nicht entzündliche (Hurley‐Grad‐I, ‐II und ‐III) HS/AI. Orale Tetrazykline oder eine 5‐tägige intravenöse Therapie mit Clindamycin sind mit der Effektivität von Clindamycin/Rifampicin vergleichbar. Subkutan applizierbares Adalimumab, Secukinumab und Bimekizumab sind für die Therapie der HS/AI zugelassen. Für die vorwiegend nicht entzündliche Erkrankungsform stehen verschiedene operative Verfahren zur Verfügung. Medikamentöse/chirurgische Kombinationen gelten als ganzheitliches Therapieverfahren.

Data wobbles in hidradenitis suppurativa clinical trials and potential contributing factors: a retrospective review

Background

In some hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) clinical trial study arms, there is an unexpected decline in efficacy between the penultimate visit and the prespecified primary endpoint week, which we have termed a "wobble."

Objective

We aimed to establish how often study arms in HS programs wobble.

Methods

In a retrospective review, we identified HS clinical trials listed on ClinicalTrials.gov testing systemic, nonantibiotic medications that utilized Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) as an outcome measure. We identified study arms demonstrating greater improvement in a visit prior to the primary endpoint week. Baseline subject characteristics were compared between studies with HiSCR wobble and no HiSCR wobble.

Results

A total of 21 studies (randomized control trial [RCT], n = 14; open-label, n = 7) with 35 study drug arms (RCT, n = 27; open-label, n = 8) and 14 placebo arms were identified. HiSCR wobble occurred significantly more often in RCT compared to open-label study drug arms (11/27 [40.7%] vs 0/8 [0%]). In RCT study arms with HiSCR wobble, baseline draining fistula counts were significantly lower (2.3 vs 3.2), and numerically fewer Hurley stage 3 patients (33.2% vs 42.5%), lower weighted total abscess and nodule counts (12.1 vs 12.6), lower weighted dermatology life quality index scores (12.5 vs 14.5), and a higher proportion of female patients (63.9% vs 58.3%) were observed.

Limitations

Include low number of HS clinical trials and insufficient data reported in many studies to assess for wobble, degree of wobble, and to compare all baseline characteristics.

Conclusion

Nonlinear improvement in study arm response occurs in some HS RCTs. Potential contributing factors include a higher proportion of less severe patients at baseline and more female patients.

S2k guideline for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa / acne inversa - Short version

The S2k guideline on hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS/AI) aims to provide an accepted decision aid for the selection/implementation of appropriate/sufficient therapy. HS/AI is a chronic recurrent, inflammatory, potentially mutilating skin disease of the terminal hair follicle-glandular apparatus, with painful, inflammatory lesions in the apocrine gland-rich regions of the body. Its point prevalence in Germany is 0.3%, it is diagnosed with a delay of 10.0 ± 9.6 years. Abnormal differentiation of the keratinocytes of the hair follicle-gland apparatus and accompanying inflammation form the central pathogenetic basis. Primary HS/AI lesions are inflammatory nodules, abscesses and draining tunnels. Recurrences in the last 6 months with at least 2 lesions at the predilection sites point to HS/AI with a 97% accuracy. HS/AI patients suffer from a significant reduction in quality of life. For correct treatment decisions, classification and activity assessment should be done with a validated tool, such as the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System (IHS4). HS/AI is classified into two forms according to the degree of detectable inflammation: active, inflammatory (mild, moderate, and severe according to IHS4) and predominantly inactive, non-inflammatory (Hurley grade I, II and III) HS/AI. Oral tetracyclines or 5-day intravenous therapy with clindamycin are equal to the effectiveness of clindamycin/rifampicin. Subcutaneously administered adalimumab, secukinumab and bimekizumab are approved for the therapy of HS/AI. Various surgical procedures are available for the predominantly non-inflammatory disease form. Drug/surgical combinations are considered a holistic therapy method.

Efficacy and safety of a combined pharmacological and surgical approach in patients affected by hidradenitis suppurativa: data from a retrospective real-world clinical study

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating chronic skin disease; its therapeutic approach often requires combined medical and surgical treatment.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the surgical approach combined with different pharmacological treatments, evaluating the proportion of patients achieving the hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR), along with the incidence of postoperative complications, and local recurrence. A retrospective study of HS patients (Hurley I-III) presenting at least one skin lesion requiring surgery was performed. Demographic and clinical data were collected (kind and anatomical location of lesion excised, type of surgical procedure). Further data included: Hurley stage and IHS4 at baseline and week 16, HiSCR at week 16 after surgery, ongoing therapy at the time of surgery (topical, systemic antibiotic, biologics), postoperative complications and local recurrence at week 16.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with female predominance (66.7%, 28/42), with a mean age of 30.3 (SD±10.5) years, were enrolled. At week 16, 53% of patients achieved HiSCR, with baseline Hurley III inversely related to HiSCR achievement (P<0.05). No increased incidence of postoperative complications was detected. Three cases of local recurrence were reported at week 16.

CONCLUSIONS

The results support the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy in the management of HS; no increased risk of complications emerged among patients concomitantly treated with biologics, compared to those on conventional systemic therapy or exclusively treated with surgery.

Efficacy and safety of the oral Janus kinase 1 inhibitor povorcitinib (INCB054707) in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa in a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Janus kinase 1 inhibition may alleviate hidradenitis suppurativa (HS)-associated inflammation and improve symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

To assess efficacy and safety of povorcitinib (selective oral Janus kinase 1 inhibitor) in HS.

METHODS

This placebo-controlled phase 2 study randomized patients with HS 1:1:1:1 to receive povorcitinib 15, 45, or 75 mg or placebo for 16 weeks. Primary and key secondary end points were mean change from baseline in abscess and inflammatory nodule count and percentage of patients achieving HS Clinical Response at week 16.

RESULTS

Of 209 patients randomized (15 mg, n = 52; 45 mg, n = 52; 75 mg, n = 53; placebo, n = 52), 83.3% completed the 16-week treatment. At week 16, povorcitinib significantly reduced abscess and inflammatory nodule count from baseline (least squares mean [SE] change: 15 mg, -5.2 [0.9], P = .0277; 45 mg, -6.9 [0.9], P = .0006; 75 mg, -6.3 [0.9], P = .0021) versus placebo (-2.5 [0.9]). More povorcitinib-treated patients achieved HS Clinical Response at week 16 (15 mg, 48.1%, P = .0445; 45 mg, 44.2%, P = .0998; 75 mg, 45.3%, P = .0829) versus placebo (28.8%). A total of 60.0% and 65.4% of povorcitinib- and placebo-treated patients had adverse events.

LIMITATIONS

Baseline lesion counts were mildly imbalanced between groups.

CONCLUSION

Povorcitinib demonstrated efficacy in HS, with no evidence of increased incidence of adverse events among doses.

Automated classification of hidradenitis suppurativa disease severity by convolutional neural network analyses using calibrated clinical images

BACKGROUND

The assessment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) severity requires detailed, and error-prone lesion counts. This proof-of-concept study aimed to automatically classify HS disease severity using machine learning of clinical smartphone images.

METHODS

777 ambient-light and size-controlled images were used to build a class-balanced synthetic dataset (n = 7675). Convolutional neural networks (CNN) were used for automated severity classification (scale 0-3), and to assess disease-dynamics. International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) served as reference. A U-NET algorithm was implemented for automated localization of diseased skin.

RESULTS

CNNs were able to distinguish no/mild from moderate/severe disease with an overall prediction accuracy of 78% [receiver operating curve (AUC) 0.85]. Correct IHS4 classification was achieved with an overall accuracy of 72% (AUC 0.84-0.89). In addition, disease dynamics using IHS4 numerical values aligned with CNN outputs (NRMSE 0.262). The UNET algorithm localized lesions with a pixel accuracy of 88.1% and test loss of 0.42.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations in assessing tattooed and hairy skin. Limited number of patients with dark skin colour and Hurley I.

CONCLUSION

CNNs were able to distinguish no/mild from moderate/severe disease, classify disease severity over time, and automatically identify diseased skin areas and the skin phototype. This study breaks new grounds for fast, reliable, reproducible and easy-to-use HS severity assessments using clinical images.

Comparative efficacy and therapeutic positioning of biologics in hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomised trials

Background Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a challenging inflammatory skin condition. Recently, many different biologics have been tested for HS, but the paucity of head-to-head comparative trials makes it difficult to determine the real value of each biological intervention. We aimed to determine the relative efficacy among biologics in treating moderate-to-severe HS throughout a network meta-analysis (NMA) and, to identify which pathogenetic pathways may be the most appropriate to target. Methods We comprehensively identified studies in 3 databases and clinicaltrials.gov. The eligibility criteria included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting data on the efficacy of moderate-to-severe HS. Results The NMA comprised 13 studies comprising 14 interventions on 2,748 participants in the network. The NMA showed the odds of achieving the clinical response were significantly superior with adalimumab (RR: 0.37, 95% CI = 0.06-0.63), adalimumab QW (RR: 0.63, 95% CI = 0.43-0.87), MAB1p (RR: 1.33, 95% CI = 0.03-3.12), secukinumab (RR: 0.25, 95% CI = 0.11-0.47) and secukinumabQ2W (RR: 0.24, 95% CI = 0.1-0.46) compared to placebo. Conclusion Based on the NMA, inhibiting tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-a with adalimumab appears to be the best strategy, followed by the blockade of IL--17 with secukinumab. Data for bimekizumab and CJM112 are promising. Infliximab has inconsistent clinical response, and more data are necessary to confirm this molecule as a potential third-line therapy in HS. The blockade of IL-23 and CD5a pathways is not relevant, or at least the current evidence is insufficient to recommend further investigation of guselkumab, risankizumab, and vilobelimab in phase III trials.

[Hidradenitis suppurativa]

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic and debilitating inflammatory disease derived from the pilosebaceous unit, that affects approximately 1% of the general population. Clinically, it is characterized by inflammatory nodules, abscesses, and tunnels in the intertriginous areas of the body, especially in the axillary, inguinal, and anogenital regions. The etiopathogenesis of HS is not completely understood, although it is considered to be multifactorial, and the result of a complex interaction between genetic, hormonal, environmental, and immunological factors. In this sense, several proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-L-1β, and IL-17, among others, appear to play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Currently, HS is recognized as a systemic disease associated with numerous comorbidities, including cardiovascular, immune-mediated, and endocrine-metabolic diseases. The treatment of HS must be carried out with an individualized and patient-oriented approach, considering medical and surgical treatment modalities.

Review of Scoring Systems for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory disorder characterized by chronic deep-seated nodules, abscesses, fistulae, sinus tracts, and scars in apocrine gland-bearing regions. Assessing its severity is challenging because of its clinical heterogeneity, lack of a standardized tool, and increasing severity scores. This article provides a chronological overview of HS grading scales to aid in the understanding and comparison of different scoring systems. A literature review of articles published in English on PubMed was conducted searched from 1989 to 2023. The review includes 15 scores that are the most relevant and widely used and acknowledges the existence of over 30 scoring systems for HS. The expanding landscape of HS scoring systems presents challenges when patients evaluated using different systems are compared. A universally accepted scoring system is required for consistent application across diverse populations. A comprehensive assessment should balance subjective and objective items, considering observer-reported signs and patient-reported symptoms to make meaningful treatment decisions.

A systematic review of Janus kinase inhibitors and spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitors for Hidradenitis suppurativa treatment

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a challenging skin disease with an underlying inflammatory process. Substantial progress has been made in our understanding of HS over the last few years, with the advancement of novel treatment approaches. The current systematic review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) inhibitors in treating HS.

METHOD

A thorough systematic search was performed on PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and Ovid Embase databases up to September 23th, 2023. Clinical studies published in English were included.

RESULTS

Our search yielded ten articles with a total of 165 patients treated with four types of JAK inhibitors (upadacitinib, povorcitinib, tofacitinib, and baricitinib) and one Syk inhibitor (fostamatinib). Upadacitinib, povorcitinib, and tofacitinib improved clinical outcomes, with a significant reduction in hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR) and abscess and inflammatory nodule count (AN count) during the treatment period. Also, these drugs are well tolerated in most HS patients with minimal adverse events (AEs). Moreover, baricitinib depicted an amelioration in signs and symptoms of HS in one case report. Also, fostamatinib exhibited favorable tolerability throughout a 12-week in moderate-to-severe HS patients. The remarkable clinical improvement, as assessed through HiSCR and hidradenitis suppurativa severity (IHS4), corresponded closely with serological indicators of inflammation following fostamatinib administration was achieved.

CONCLUSION

JAK and Syk inhibitors are potentially efficacious in managing moderate-to-severe HS since the proinflammatory cytokines are mediated by JAK and Syk signaling pathways. However, further research with a more rigorous examination is mandatory to evaluate such medication's long-term safety and efficacy.

Hidradenitis suppurativa: new insights into disease mechanisms and an evolving treatment landscape

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), also known as acne inversa, is a chronic disabling and debilitating inflammatory disease with a high unmet medical need. The prevalence of HS reported in most studies is 1-2%, although it is likely to be under-reported and estimates vary globally owing to variance in data collection methods, ethnicity, geographical location and under-diagnosis. HS is characterized by persistent, painful cutaneous nodules, abscesses and draining tunnels commonly affecting the axillary, anogenital, inguinal and perianal/gluteal areas. Over time, chronic uncontrolled inflammation results in irreversible tissue destruction and scarring. Although the pathophysiology of HS has not been fully elucidated, the tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-17 pathways have an important role, involving multiple cytokines. Currently, treatment options include topical medications; systemic therapies, including repeated and/or rotational courses of systemic antibiotics, retinoids and hormonal therapies; and various surgical procedures. The anti-TNF-α antibody adalimumab is currently the only biologic approved by both the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for HS; however, its efficacy varies, with a clinical response reported in approximately 50% of patients in phase III trials. HS is a rapidly evolving field of discovery, with a diverse range of agents with distinct mechanisms of action currently being explored in clinical trials. Several other promising therapeutic targets have recently emerged, and agents targeting the IL-17 and Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways are the most advanced in ongoing or completed phase III clinical trials. Alongside limited therapeutic options, significant challenges remain in terms of diagnosis and disease management, with a need for better treatment outcomes. Other unmet needs include significant diagnostic delays, thus missing the therapeutic 'window of opportunity'; the lack of standardized outcome measures in clinical trials; and the lack of established, well-defined disease phenotypes and biomarkers.

A Practical Guide to Using Biologics in Pediatric Dermatology

Psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), atopic dermatitis (AD), and chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), are common, immune-mediated, chronic, inflammatory skin diseases that can affect the pediatric population. While there is adequate evidence supporting the use of biologics in pediatric patients, concerns regarding safety and efficacy amongst healthcare providers are not uncommon. However, new emerging evidence in this population highlights the safety of biologic therapy, making it crucial to review and establish a practical guide for their use. This article describes a methodological framework for initiating biologics in the management of pediatric psoriasis, HS, AD, and CSU, with a special focus on baseline work-up, monitoring, dosing, and considerations in this population.

Taiwanese Dermatological Association (TDA) consensus recommendations for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory follicular disease characterized by painful, recurrent, inflamed lesions most commonly occurring in the axillary, inguinal, and anogenital regions. HS can inflict immense physical and psychological impact on patients who suffer from this distressing disease. Management of HS generally requires combining various medical and procedural treatment modalities; however, the disease is often recalcitrant to conventional treatments. In light of recent evidence supporting the effectiveness of biologic agents in the treatment of HS, the Taiwanese Dermatological Association established an expert panel of nine dermatologists to develop consensus statements aimed to provide up-to-date evidence-based guidance in optimizing HS patient management in Taiwan. The recommendations described in the statements were summarized in a management algorithm in terms of general care, topical treatment, systemic treatment, and procedural treatment.

Secukinumab in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

The IL-17 pathways are involved in the pathophysiology of many inflammatory skin conditions, including hidradenitis suppurativa. Secukinumab, an IL-17A inhibitor, has been used for years in inflammatory skin disorders such as psoriasis. To date, the only US FDA-approved medication for hidradenitis suppurativa is adalimumab, a TNF-α inhibitor. Recently, secukinumab has demonstrated promising results in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa in the phase III SUNSHINE and SUNRISE clinical trials. This article reviews the mechanism of action of secukinumab and summarizes the available clinical efficacy and safety data regarding secukinumab in the management of hidradenitis suppurativa.

Biology of Interleukin-17 and Novel Therapies for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Skin disorders affect ∼40% of the human population. One of the most debilitating cutaneous disorders is Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), a noncommunicable chronic inflammatory disease with an estimated global prevalence of 0.4% to 2.5%. In January 2011, high levels of IL-17 were discovered in skin lesions of HS patients. In the following years, translational and clinical research led to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of HS. In June 2023, more than 12 years after the initial note, secukinumab, an anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody, was approved for the treatment of moderate to severe HS. This is the next milestone in improving the treatment of these patients after the approval of the anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody adalimumab in 2015. In this review article, we present the IL-17 pathway in HS and discuss the use of secukinumab as a therapeutic option for this disease. Our review starts with a description of the epidemiology, clinical features, etiology, and pathogenesis of HS. An overview of the IL-17/IL-17 receptor system in general and a detailed description of the known facts about the expression and action of IL-17 in HS follow. Afterward, we consider the results of clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of IL-17 inhibitors in HS. Finally, a comparison is made between secukinumab and adalimumab and the characteristics of the patients that may be particularly suitable for each of these biologics are described.

What should a surgeon know about hidradenitis suppurativa?

Otherwise known as Verneuil's disease, hidradenitis suppurative (HS) is a severe dermatosis of heterogeneous appearance affecting 1% of the population. Its pathophysiology is multifactorial, involving genetic predisposition, inflammatory disorder and environmental elements. Its diagnosis is based on the association of three clinical characteristics: characteristic lesions, typical localizations, and the chronic and recurrent nature of the lesions. Given its diversified aspects, diagnosis can be difficult to achieve. As its manifestations often include abscesses, it is important for the surgeon to know how to detect this pathology. The development of biologics has improved treatment of this disease, treatment that necessitates a multidisciplinary medical and surgical approach involving dermatologists and proctologists as well as surgeons. The objective of this report is to synthesize what a surgeon will need to know so as effectively treat HS patients.

Navigating the Multidimensional Impact of Living with Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An In-Depth Netnographic Study on Social Media Platforms

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin condition causing considerable distress. It impacts mobility, social interaction, and quality of life. In Brazil, there is a notable gap in epidemiological data and patient experiences regarding HS.

METHODS

This study, spanning 2019 to 2022, employed netnography to probe the experiences of Brazilian patients with HS. This approach gleans insights from online interactions, offering a direct view into patients' lives.

RESULTS

Notably, the data illuminated the challenges patients face, such as difficulties in obtaining a diagnosis and the complexities involved in managing a chronic, and often debilitating, condition. Furthermore, patients' experiences with various treatments, encompassing antibiotics, biologic agents, lifestyle alterations, surgical procedures, and alternative remedies, were also examined.

CONCLUSION

By undertaking a longitudinal analysis of patient interactions, the study aimed to offer a richer understanding of HS, from its diagnosis to its treatment. It underscores the necessity for a more patient-centered approach when managing this condition. We hope that this enhanced understanding can facilitate better care for those affected by HS.

Azathioprine in hidradenitis suppurativa with inflammatory phenotype: a case series of 11 patients

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease that negatively impacts the quality of life of patients. It presents as deep-seated nodules, abscesses, fistulae, sinus tracts, and scars in the axilla, inguinal area, submammary folds, and perianal area. Recently, two phenotypes have been described: a follicular phenotype and an inflammatory phenotype. Numerous medical treatments are available for hidradenitis suppurativa, with particular importance of antitumor necrosis factor antibodies. Due to the association of HS with other conditions with a pro-inflammatory state, particularly Crohn's disease, it has been suggested that azathioprine may have a role in the treatment of HS.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of azathioprine monotherapy in patients with moderate-severe HS.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied patients with HS treated with azathioprine in monotherapy. We performed both clinical and ultrasound evaluation at baseline as well as in the follow-up visits. Their baseline score on the iHS4 and DLQI scales and 12-16 weeks after starting the treatment were compared. We also registered the number of patients who achieved HiSCR.

RESULTS

Six patients presented significant improvement, reducing their score in iHS4 and DLQI scales and achieving HiSCR. Another patient had clinical improvement, meaning reduction in iHS4 and DLQI, but without achieving HiSCR. Two patients stopped the treatment before week 12 because of adverse events. The remaining two patients presented no improvement. The median (Q3-Q1) baseline iHS4 score was 6 (12-6), and follow-up iHS4 score, 4 (6-2), being these differences statistically significant (P = 0.006). Median (Q3-Q1) baseline DLQI scores and 12-16 weeks after treatment were 17 (23-11) and 14 (18-9) although statistically nonsignificant (P = 0.099).

CONCLUSION

We present a case series of 11 patients treated with azathioprine with good clinical and ultrasonographic response. We suggest that azathioprine may benefit a certain patient profile with the inflammatory phenotype.

A proof-of-concept open-label clinical trial of spleen tyrosine kinase antagonism using fostamatinib in moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an autoinflammatory disorder of keratinization with a prominence of B cells and plasma cells. Fostamatinib is a spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting B cells and plasma cells.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety, tolerability, and clinical response at week 4 and week 12 of fostamatinib in moderate-to-severe HS.

METHODS

Twenty participants were administered fostamatinib 100 mg twice a day for 4 weeks, escalating to 150 mg twice a day thereafter until week 12. Participants were assessed for adverse events and clinical response assessed by HiSCR (Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response Score) and IHS4 (International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score) as well as other outcomes including DLQI (Dermatology Life Quality Index), visual analog scale, and physician global assessment.

RESULTS

All 20 participants completed the week 4 and week 12 endpoints. Fostamatinib was well tolerated in this cohort with no grade 2/3 adverse events reported. A total of 85% achieved HiSCR at week 4 and 85% at week 12. The greatest reduction in disease activity was seen at weeks 4/5 with worsening in a proportion of patients thereafter. Significant improvements were seen in pain, itch, and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Fostamatinib was well tolerated in this HS cohort with no serious adverse events and improvement in clinical outcomes. Targeting B cells/plasma cells may be a viable therapeutic strategy in HS and requires further exploration.

Worst area local Hidradenitis suppurativa Activity and Severity Index-Revised (W-HASI-R): a study evaluating construct validity

Current validated hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) severity assessment tools are time-consuming and impractical in fast-paced, ambulatory clinic settings. This study evaluated the construct validity of the most severe or ‘worst’ area local Hidradenitis suppurativa Activity and Severity Index-Revised (W-HASI-R) as a novel target area assessment tool for clinical setting use. W-HASI-R had strong association with the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System and abscess and nodule count, moderate association with Hurley stage and HS physician global assessment and weak, negative association with reverse-scored Dermatology Quality Life Index. The resulting data suggest that W-HASI-R may be an option as an efficient target area assessment tool for fast-paced, ambulatory settings.

Hidradenitis suppurativa - biologic therapy and other available treatment options

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic recurrent inflammatory skin disease which is characterized by painful, recurrent nodules and abscesses. The overall prevalence of HS is estimated to be 11 per 100 000 individuals in the United States and 4% of the world's population. Women are three times more affected than men, especially patients between 18 and 29 years. Similarly to acne vulgaris, HS is primarily associated with follicular occlusion, which results from a number of biological processes, including follicular epithelial hyperplasia and hyperkeratinization. There are numerous available treatment options for cutaneous lesions in the course of HS. A combination of conservative therapy and appropriate surgical treatment conducted by an experienced surgeon ensures the best possible clinical outcomes. Presently, biologic therapy is the most effective pharmacological treatment in patients with a moderate-to-severe course of the disease. Numerous ongoing clinical trials provide hope for greater availability of new biologic therapy methods.

Obstacles to Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Current Perspectives on Improving Clinical Management

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that can progress to significant tunnels and scars that affect quality of life, especially if diagnosis and treatment are delayed. Average delay after initial presentation of HS symptoms can range from 3 to 10 years in adults and 1 to 2 years in children. Factors associated with diagnostic delay include female gender, non-white race, and greater disease severity at diagnosis. Contributing factors include misdiagnoses, difficulty accessing a dermatologist, hesitation in seeking care due to the stigmatizing nature of the disease, and lack of awareness among providers and patients. While efforts to increase awareness include academic talks at conferences and by foundations geared toward HS, social media offers the opportunity to reach young audiences. Many patients report dissatisfaction with their HS treatments. Better understanding of HS pathophysiology and implementation of clinically focused phenotypes and endotypes can lead to development of more targeted and efficacious therapies. FDA approval of medications for HS beyond adalimumab will increase access to a wider selection of therapies, and implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring may maximize the use of biologics for HS.

Oral Tetracycline-Class Drugs in Dermatology: Impact of Food Intake on Absorption and Efficacy

Tetracycline-class drugs are frequently used in dermatology for their anti-inflammatory properties to treat skin diseases such as acne, rosacea, and hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). The American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) clinical guidelines do not offer guidance regarding the co-administration of food with tetracycline-class drugs. The objectives of this study were to review the available evidence regarding whether taking tetracycline-class drugs with food decreases systemic absorption and is associated with an impact on clinical efficacy. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database between February to May 2023 using the keywords "tetracycline-class drugs", "pharmacokinetics", "absorption", and "dermatology". Inclusion criteria included articles written in English and relevant to the absorption and efficacy of tetracycline-class drugs. This search yielded 131 articles written between 1977 to 2022, of which 29 met the criteria for review. United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved prescribing information for oral formulations of tetracycline, doxycycline, minocycline, and sarecycline were reviewed. Systemic absorption of tetracycline decreased when co-administered with food. Systemic absorption of oral doxycycline and minocycline was variable with food co-administration. The impact on bioavailability varied with the drug formulation and dosage. The absorption of oral sarecycline decreased when administered with food. Sarecycline is the only oral antibiotic where population pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated limited or no impact of food intake on clinical efficacy. There are no available data for other tetracycline-class drugs in dermatology. If patients find it more tolerable to take doxycycline, minocycline, and sarecycline with food to avoid gastrointestinal distress, this may merit consideration to encourage patient adherence. Since the impact of food intake on absorption varied with the dosage form of doxycycline and minocycline, consulting the appropriate package insert may give clinicians additional insight into differences in the various formulations.

Emerging Treatments and the Clinical Trial Landscape for Hidradenitis Suppurativa Part I: Topical and Systemic Medical Therapies

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an oftentimes debilitating condition that presents with painful nodules, abscesses, and sinus tracts. This condition is challenging to treat, in part because the pathogenesis of the condition is incompletely understood but also because there are limited therapeutic options. HS research is undergoing explosive growth with multiple new molecular pathways under study, which will hopefully lead to improved disease control for patients. Part I of this review will provide an overview of the emerging topical and systemic therapies under investigation for HS.

A Case of Concurrent Psoriasis and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Successfully Treated with Tildrakizumab

INTRODUCTION

Plaque psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa are chronic inflammatory skin conditions with common pathogenetic pathways.

METHODS

We report the case of a 38-year-old man with 15-year history of psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa successfully treated with tildrakizumab for both conditions. After treatment failure to adalimumab, secukinumab, and guselkumab, tildrakizumab therapy was initiated and resulted in complete remission of psoriasis and the achievement of hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response after 40 weeks, without reporting adverse events. These responses were maintained at week 52.

CONCLUSION

Tildrakizumab may be an effective and safe therapeutic option for concomitant psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa.

Efficacy and Safety of Biologics and Small Molecules for Moderate-to-Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background: Treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is difficult and current guidelines are based mainly on expert opinion and non-randomized controlled trials. Recently, there have been some targeted therapies using uniform primary endpoints for outcome assessment. Objective: Recommendations can be provided on selecting biologics and targeted synthetic small molecules for refractory HS by comparing the efficacy and safety of these medications. Methods: Databases including ClinicalTrial.gov, Cochrane Library, and PubMed were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for moderate-to-severe HS were eligible. We performed random-effect network meta-analysis and ranking probability. The primary outcome was Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at 12-16 weeks. Secondary outcome included Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1, mean change of DLQI from baseline, and adverse effects. Results: A total of 12 RCTs involving 2915 patients were identified. Adalimumab, bimekizumab, secukinumab 300 mg q4w and secukinumab 300 mg q2w showed superiority to placebo in HiSCR at weeks 12 to 16. In addition, there was no significant difference between bimekizumab and adalimumab as measured by HiSCR (RR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.66-1.52) and DLQI 0/1 (RR = 2.40, 95% CI: 0.88-6.50). In terms of ranking probability for achieving HiSCR at 12-16 weeks, adalimumab ranked first, followed by bimekizumab, secukinumab 300 mg q4w, and secukinumab 300 mg q2w. All biologics and small molecules did not differ in the development of adverse effects compared to placebo. Conclusions: Adalimumab, bimekizumab, secukinumab 300 mg q4w and secukinumab 300 mg q2w represent four regimens that produce better outcomes than placebo without increased risk of adverse events. Adalimumab and bimekizumab exhibited best HiSCR and DLQI 0/1 between weeks 12-16.

Metformin Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Effect on Metabolic Parameters, Inflammation, Cardiovascular Risk Biomarkers, and Immune Mediators

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a common cutaneous and systemic inflammatory disease with a significant impact on mental health and quality of life. It is associated with obesity, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular (CV) disease, and increased all-cause mortality. Metformin is used frequently in HS treatment and is effective for some patients. The mechanism of action of metformin in HS is unknown. A case-control study of 40 patients with HS (20 on metformin and 20 controls) was conducted to assess differences in metabolic markers, inflammation (C-reactive protein [CRP], serum adipokines, and CV risk biomarkers), and serum immune mediators. Body mass index (BMI), insulin resistance (77%), and metabolic syndrome (44%) were high overall, but not significantly different between the groups. This highlights the need for co-morbidity screening and management. A significant reduction in fasting insulin and a trend towards a reduction in insulin resistance were identified in the metformin group compared with pre-treatment levels. CV risk biomarkers were significantly favourable in the metformin group (lymphocytes, monocyte-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-lymphocyte ratio). CRP was lower in the metformin group but was not statistically significant. Adipokines were dysregulated overall but were not different between the two groups. Serum IFN-γ, IL-8, TNF-α, and CXCL1 trended lower in the metformin group but did not reach significance. These results suggest that metformin improves CV risk biomarkers and insulin resistance in patients with HS. When the results of this study are considered alongside other studies in HS and related conditions, it is likely that metformin also has beneficial effects on metabolic markers and systemic inflammation in HS (CRP, serum adipokines, and immune mediators), warranting further research.

Short-Term Effectiveness, Safety, and Potential Predictors of Response of Secukinumab in Patients with Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa Refractory to Biologic Therapy: A Multicenter Observational Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease. Biologic drugs have a key role in the long-term anti-inflammatory treatment of moderate to severe patients due to their immunomodulatory properties. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in patients with moderate to severe HS after 16 weeks of treatment, and to explore potential predictors of clinical response to the drug.

METHODS

Multicenter observational retrospective study. Patients treated with secukinumab 300 mg every 2 or 4 weeks who had completed at least 16 weeks of follow-up from nine hospitals based in southern Spain (Andalusia) were included in this study. Treatment effectiveness was assessed using the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR). Information about adverse events was collected, the therapeutic burden of the patients was calculated as the summation of systemic medical treatments and surgical interventions (excluding incision and drainage) experienced until the start of secukinumab treatment.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients with severe HS were included for analysis. At week 16, 48.9% (23/47) of patients achieved HiSCR. Adverse events were present in 6.4% (3/47) of the patients. The multivariate analysis showed that female sex and, to a lesser extent, lower body mass index (BMI) and a lower therapeutic burden were potentially associated with a higher probability of HiSCR achievement.

CONCLUSIONS

Favorable short-term effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in the treatment of severe HS patients were observed. Female sex, lower BMI and a lower therapeutic burden may be associated with a higher probability of achieving HiSCR.

Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab for the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, immune-mediated skin condition characterized by inflammatory lesions that can cause pain, impaired physical activity, and reduced quality of life. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of risankizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that specifically inhibits interleukin 23 by binding to its p19 subunit, for the treatment of HS.

METHODS

This phase II multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study investigated the efficacy and safety of risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe HS. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous risankizumab 180 mg; risankizumab 360 mg; or placebo at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, and 12. Patients initially randomized to placebo received blinded risankizumab 360 mg at weeks 16, 17, and 18; patients initially randomized to risankizumab received blinded matching placebo at the same time points. From weeks 20-60, all patients received open-label risankizumab 360 mg every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the achievement of HS Clinical Response (HiSCR) at week 16. Safety was assessed by monitoring of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

RESULTS

A total of 243 patients were randomized (risankizumab 180 mg, n = 80; risankizumab 360 mg, n = 81; placebo, n = 82). HiSCR was achieved by 46.8% of patients with risankizumab 180 mg, 43.4% with risankizumab 360 mg, and 41.5% with placebo at week 16. The primary endpoint was not met, and the study was terminated early. Incidence of TEAEs, severe TEAEs, TEAEs considered possibly related to study drug, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug were generally low and comparable across treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Risankizumab does not appear to be an efficacious treatment for moderate-to-severe HS. Future studies to understand the complex molecular mechanisms underlying HS pathogenesis and develop improved therapies are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03926169.

Overview and comparison of the clinical scores in hidradenitis suppurativa: A real-life clinical data

Introduction

Partly due to its clinical heterogeneity, hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is difficult to score accurately; illustrated by the large number of disease scores. In 2016, a systematic review by Ingram et al. reported the use of about thirty scores, and since then, this number has increased further. Our aim is twofold: to provide a succinct but detailed narrative review of the scores used to date, and to compare these scores with each other for individual patients.

Materials and methods

The review of the literature was done among articles in English and French, on Google, Google scholar, Pubmed, ScienceDirect and Cochrane. To illustrate the differences between scores, data from some Belgian patients included in the European Registry for HS were selected. A first series of patients compares the severity of the following scores: Hurley, Hurley Staging refined, three versions of Sartorius score (2003, 2007, 2009), Hidradenitis Suppurativa Physician Global Assessment (HS-PGA), International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System (IHS4), Severity Assessment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa (SAHS), Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Index (HSSI), Acne Inversa Severity Index (AISI), the Static Metascore, and one score that is not specific to HS: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). A second set of patients illustrates how some scores change over time and with treatment: Hurley, Hurley Staging refined, Sartorius 2003, Sartorius 2007, HS-PGA, IHS4, SAHS, AISI, Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR), the very new iHS4-55, the Dynamic Metascore, and DLQI.

Results

Nineteen scores are detailed in this overview. We illustrate that for some patients, the scores do not predictably and consistently correlate with each other, either in an evaluation of the severity at a time-point t, or in the evaluation of the response to a treatment. Some patients in this cohort may be considered responders according to some scores, but non-responders according to others. The clinical heterogeneity of the disease, represented by its many phenotypes, seems partly to explain this difference.

Conclusion

These examples illustrate how the choice of a score can lead to different interpretations of the response to a treatment, or even potentially change the results of a randomized clinical trial.

Current Medical and Surgical Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa-A Comprehensive Review

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease presenting with recurrent inflammatory lesions in intertriginous body regions. HS has a pronounced impact on patients' quality of life and is associated with a variety of comorbidities. Treatment of HS is often complex, requiring an individual approach with medical and surgical treatments available. However, especially in moderate-to-severe HS, there is an urgent need for new treatment approaches. In recent years, increased research has led to the identification of new potential therapeutic targets. This review aims to give a comprehensive and practical overview of current treatment options for HS. Furthermore, the clinically most advanced novel treatment approaches will be discussed.

Adalimumab therapy is associated with increased faecal short chain fatty acids in hidradenitis suppurativa

Altered gut microbiota composition has been observed in individuals with hidradenitis suppurutiva (HS) and many other inflammatory diseases, including obesity, type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Here, we addressed whether adalimumab, a systemic anti-inflammatory therapy, may impact the microbiota biochemical profile, particularly on beneficial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). We conducted an observational single-arm pilot trial to assess gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and to detect metabolite signatures by gas chromatography in stool samples from participants with HS prior to and 12 weeks after commencing adalimumab therapy. HS individuals that better responded to adalimumab treatment showed a shift in the composition and function of the gut microbiota with significantly increased SCFA acetate and propionate compared to age, gender and BMI-matched healthy controls. A positive correlation was observed between propionate with Prevotella sp and Faecalibacterium prausnitsii. Increased SCFAs, changes in gut microbiota composition, function and metabolic profile following 12 weeks of adalimumab suggest that targeting SCFAs may be considered a potential biomarker to be evaluated as a complementary protective factor or as a diagnostically relevant signal in HS.

Predictive signature development based on maximizing the area between receiver operating characteristic curves

Development of marker signatures to predict treatment benefits for a new therapeutic is an important scientific component in advancing the drug discovery and is an important first step toward the goal of precision medicine. In this article, we focus on developing an algorithm to search for optimal linear combination of markers that maximizes the area between two receiver operating characteristic curves of the new therapeutic and the control groups without assuming any parametric model. We further generalize the proposed algorithm for predictive signature development to maximize the difference of Harrel's C-index of the new therapeutic and the control groups when the outcome of interest is time-to-event. The performance of this proposed method is evaluated and compared to existing methods via simulations and real clinical trial data.

The Effect of Dalbavancin in Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by painful nodules, abscesses, and fistulas, localized to the areas of the folds where apocrine glands are present: the armpits, groin, inframammary region, and genital or perineal region. The management is still challenging, and it includes mainly systemic antibiotics, immunosuppressors, and biologic agents. Antibiotics are frequently used in the management of HS for their anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and antimicrobial properties, but no data have been reported regarding the use of dalbavancin in HS. The aim of our practice was to evaluate efficacy, flare, and disease-free survival after dalbavancin therapy in a selected population with HS. We report the experience of the Ancona Dermatology Clinic in treating HS flare-ups with dalbavancin and its rationale for use. Our observation shows that the use of dalbavancin is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for the management of Hurley stage II-III HS; currently, dalbavancin should be considered as a supportive therapy for selected patients.

Switching from adalimumab originator to biosimilars in hidradenitis suppurativa: What's beyond cost-effectiveness?

In the last years, adalimumab biosimilars have represented a commonly used alternative to the originator agent in the treatment of moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa. As of today, studies investigating the switch from adalimumab originator to biosimilar, following pharmacoeconomic policies, are lacking. Herein we present a real-life setting retrospective study aimed at assessing the safety and efficacy of this switch in 37 patients, evaluated for 12 months in terms of IHS4 (International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System) and HiSCR (Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response). Overall, no significant differences emerge between adalimumab originator and biosimilar in terms of clinical response following non-medical switch. High discontinuation rates (43.2%) raise questions on patients' compliance to the new drug regimen, as severe pain at the injection site represents a substantial cause of biosimilar discontinuation (i.e., 31.5% of the cases). In selected cases, rechallenge with adalimumab originator may represent a valid option, as 66.6% (n = 8) of the patients who switched back to the former agent have benefited in terms of tolerability and efficacy. Carefully integrating pharmacoeconomic policies with a thorough assessment regarding the benefit-risk ratio of a nonmedical switch from originator to biosimilars remains essential to provide each HS patient with the best therapeutic option.

Switching from Adalimumab Originator to Biosimilar in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa Results in Losses of Response—Data from the German HS Registry HSBest

Since 2021, adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 can be used alternatively to adalimumab originator (ADAO) in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Effectiveness and safety data remain scarce. We investigated the impact of switching from ADAO to ABP 501 on disease severity and the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) in patients with HS. We analyzed clinical data on patients enrolled in the German HSBest registry. Evaluation outcomes were assessed at three time points (baseline of originator (t0), prior to switching to biosimilar (t1) and 12 to 14 weeks after switching (t2)) and included patient-reported AEs and disease severity using the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) score. In total, 94 patients were switched from ADAO to ABP 501. Overall, 33.3% (n = 31/94) of the patients developed AEs and/or loss of response (LoR) within 12 to 14 weeks after switching. Of these, 61.3% (n = 19/31) experienced LoR but no AEs, 22.6% (n = 7/31) LoR combined with AEs and 16.1% (n = 5/31) AEs only. Our study showed that switching HS patients from ADAO to ABP 501 does significantly affect treatment effectiveness. Switching patients who are on remission maintenance therapy should be viewed critically.

Similar Levels of Efficacy of Two Different Maintenance Doses of Adalimumab on Clinical Severity and Quality of Life of Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Adalimumab is the only biologic agent approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) patients (i.e., with Hurley II or III), which is recommended in two different maintenance doses (i.e., 40 mg weekly or 80 mg every two weeks). We conducted a prospective multicentric study to measure outcomes related to the severity of disease and quality of life (QoL) of patients affected by moderate-to-severe HS, treated with adalimumab at a maintenance dosing of 40 mg or 80 mg. Assessments were performed at baseline (T0) and after 32 weeks of treatment (T32). We enrolled 85 moderate-to-severe HS Italian patients, 43 men (50.6%) and 42 women, aged between 16 and 62 years (median 31 years, interquartile range 24.4–43.8). Statistically significant improvements were observed for clinical status (with a mean reduction of 7.1 points for the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4)), pain levels (3.1 mean decrease in VAS), and QoL (3.4 mean improvement in DLQI score). Patients with no comorbidities, and those with higher levels of perceived pain showed significantly greater improvement in QoL than their counterpart from T0 to T32. As for the proportion of patients who at follow-up reached the minimal clinical important difference (MCID) in QoL, significantly higher proportions of success were observed for age (patients in the 29–39 category), pain (patients with higher reported pain), and Hurley stage III. While both treatment regimen groups (i.e., 40 vs. 80 mg) improved significantly, no statistical differences were observed when comparing the two treatment dosages.

Advances in biologic and small molecule therapies for hidradenitis suppurativa

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating inflammatory skin disorder characterized by painful nodules, abscesses, fistulae, and scarring with a predilection for flexural regions. Several biologics and small molecule inhibitors are being evaluated in clinical trials for treatment.

AREAS COVERED

The authors discuss the data available from clinical trials and smaller, high-quality studies for existing and emerging biologic and small molecule inhibitor therapies for treatment of HS. Biologics discussed include TNFα, IL-17, IL-23, IL-12/23, and IL-1 inhibitors. Small molecule inhibitors discussed include PDE4, JAK, TYK, IFX-1, and complement cascade inhibitors. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for these drugs are also described.

EXPERT OPINION

Trial data and our own experience have shown that about half of HS patients experience improvement with adalimumab. However, there is a significant need for pharmacotherapies with higher efficacy goals as in those used for psoriasis. Many biologics and small molecule inhibitors are being tested in clinical trials. The landscape of upcoming therapies for hidradenitis suppurativa appears promising.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa International Online Community: Patient Characteristics and a Novel Model of Treatment Effectiveness

Treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa is diverse, yet frequently unsatisfactory. The aims of this study were to create a reproducible artificial intelligence-based patient-reported outcome platform for evaluation of the clinical characteristics and comorbidities of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa, and to use this to grade treatment effectiveness. A retrospective patient-reported outcome study was conducted, based on online questionnaires completed by English-speaking patients registered to the hidradenitis suppurativa Stuff-ThatWorks^® online community. Data collected included patient characteristics, comorbidities and treatment satisfaction. These were recoded into scalable labels using a combination of machine learning algorithm, manual coding and validation. A model of treatment effectiveness was generated. The cohort included 1,050 patients of mean ± standard deviation age 34.3 ± 10.3 years. Greater severity of hidradenitis suppurativa was associated with younger age at onset (p < 0.001) and male sex (p < 0.001). The most frequent comorbidities were depression (30%), anxiety (26.4%), and polycystic ovary syndrome (16.6%). Hurley stage I patients rated topical agents, dietary changes, turmeric, and pain relief measures more effective than tetracyclines. For Hurley stage II, adalimumab was rated most effective. For Hurley stage III, adalimumab, other biologic agents, systemic steroids, and surgical treatment were rated more effective than tetracyclines. Patients with hidradenitis suppurativa often have comorbid psychiatric and endocrine diseases. This model of treatment effectiveness provides a direct comparison of standard and complementary options.

New and Emerging Targeted Therapies for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, inflammatory skin disease deriving from the hair follicles. The formation of inflammatory nodules, abscesses, fistulas, and sinus tracts is characterized by a large inflow of key pro-inflammatory mediators, such as IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-1, IL-17, and IL-12/23. Adalimumab is currently the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)- and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved biologic therapy for moderate to severe HS in adults and adolescents. However, the long-term effectiveness of this TNF-α inhibitor in HS patients has shown to be highly variable. This review aims to review the evidence for emerging therapies that target the main pro-inflammatory cytokines in HS pathogenesis. A review of the literature was conducted, using the PubMed and Google Scholar repositories, as well as Clinicaltrials.gov. Presently, the most promising biologics in phase III trials are anti-IL-17 antibodies, secukinumab, and bimekizumab. Furthermore, an anti-IL-1 biologic, bermekimab, is currently in phase II trials, and shows encouraging results. Overall, the clinical efficacies of all new targeted therapies published up to this point are limited. More studies need to be performed to clarify the precise molecular pathology, and assess the efficacy of biological therapies for HS.

Real-World Moderate-to-Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Decrease in Disease Burden With Adalimumab

BACKGROUND

Real-world knowledge of the burden of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) on patients remains limited.

OBJECTIVES

To measure the impact of adalimumab on moderate-to-severe HS patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and work productivity.

METHODS

In 23 Canadian centres, 138 adults with moderate-to-severe HS requiring a change in ongoing therapy were treated with adalimumab for up to 52 weeks as per the physician's practice. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained at baseline, weeks 24 and 52 to measure overall HRQoL, HS severity, levels of anxiety and depression, impact and symptoms of HS, work productivity and activity impairment. A post-hoc analysis further explored the PROMs by abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count at baseline (≤5, low; 6-10, medium; ≥11, high).

RESULTS

From baseline to weeks 24 and 52, all PRO overall scores improved significantly (P ≤ .0023). The number of patients reporting "good disease control" and "complete disease control" increased from 9.7% to 66.4% over 52 weeks. The score in Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3) pain attribute meaningfully decreased over 52 weeks (mean difference ≥.05). The HS symptoms skin "tenderness" and "itchiness" improved the most. Work productivity loss and activity impairment improved by approximately 20% over 52 weeks. Disease burden improved more in 24 week responders with low and medium AN counts at baseline than in those with high AN count or in 24 week nonresponders.

CONCLUSION

At week 24 and maintained at week 52 in a real-world setting, adalimumab meaningfully improved HRQoL, work productivity, and activity impairment in moderate-to-severe HS patients.

Switching from Adalimumab Originator to Biosimilar: Clinical Experience in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Adalimumab is currently the only biological medicine approved by the FDA for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). The breakout of biosimilar drugs made them more accessible due to their impact on pharmacoeconomics. However, packaging, formulation, or excipients are unique characteristics of each drug. In that way, switching from adalimumab originator to biosimilar and between biosimilars could have implications in the clinical practice. The objective of this study is to describe our clinical experience in switching from adalimumab originator to biosimilar and switching back again. A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted that included seventeen patients with HS treated with adalimumab originator in the maintenance phase, and that achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR), who were switched to adalimumab biosimilar for no medical reasons. The reason for the change was to improve pharmacoeconomic efficiency, following our hospital policies on biologics. Median duration with adalimumab originator treatment before switching was 48 weeks. After switching, 41.2% of patients maintained HiSCR response without additional issues, while 58.8% (10/17) reported problems after the change. Switching from adalimumab originator to biosimilar in well-controlled patients could imply problems in efficacy and adherence. Switching back to adalimumab originator appears to solve most of the problems, but some patients can lose confidence in the drug and discontinue it. It would be worthwhile to evaluate the benefit–risk ratio individually when switching an HS patient to adalimumab biosimilar.

Effectiveness and safety of topical 15% resorcinol in the management of mild-to-moderate hidradenitis suppurativa: A cohort study

Antibiotics remain one of the main treatment alternatives in mild-to-moderate hidradenitis suppurativa. The use of topical 15% resorcinol reduces antibiotic pressure and the generation of resistance. However, knowledge on its efficacy and safety is limited. This single-center, prospective, follow-up cohort study evaluated topical 15% resorcinol every 12-h response at 16 weeks. Those individuals with mild-to-moderate hidradenitis suppurativa (Hurley I-II) who started treatment with topical resorcinol monotherapy between April 2019 and May 2020 were eligible for follow-up. The primary endpoint for effectiveness was the proportion of patients who achieved an overall clinical response (complete or partial response) at week 16, evaluated as intention-to-treat. Responses were measured according to the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response index. Target lesion size was measured clinically and by ultrasonography. Quality of life was assessed through the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire. Safety was measured by recording the adverse events reported during the follow-up period. A total of 32 patients were enrolled (mean age, 40.1 years [95% confidence interval, 35.7-44.4]; women, 20 [62.5%]; Hurley I, 17 [53.1%]). Under the intention-to-treat analysis, 68.8% (n = 22) of the patients achieved a clinical response. A ≥50% reduction in the size of the main lesion was observed in 56.3% of the patients (n = 18). Some 65.6% (n = 21) of the patients had a ≥50% reduction (improvement) in their baseline DLQI score. Fifty percent of patients who completed the follow-up period experienced adverse events, all of which were local, mild, and transient and did not lead to discontinuation of resorcinol. To conclude, in this cohort study, topical 15% resorcinol was shown to be effective for mild-to-moderate hidradenitis suppurativa and to have a positive impact on quality of life with an acceptable safety profile.

Janus kinase 1 inhibitor INCB054707 for patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: results from two phase 2 studies

Background

Janus kinase (JAK)‐mediated cytokine signalling contributes to local and systemic inflammation in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).

Objectives

To describe the safety and efficacy results from two multicentre phase II trials of the JAK1 inhibitor INCB054707 in patients with moderate‐to‐severe HS.

Methods

Patients received open‐label INCB054707 15 mg once daily (QD; Study 1) or were randomized to INCB054707 30, 60 or 90 mg QD or placebo (3 : 1 within each cohort; Study 2) for 8 weeks. Eligible patients were aged 18–75 years and had moderate‐to‐severe HS (Hurley stage II/III disease), lesions present in at least two anatomical locations, and a total abscess and inflammatory nodule count ≥ 3. The primary endpoint for both studies was safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included HS Clinical Response (HiSCR) and other efficacy measures.

Results

Ten patients were enrolled in Study 1 (15 mg INCB054707) and 35 in Study 2 (INCB054707: 30 mg, n = 9; 60 mg, n = 9; 90 mg, n = 8; placebo, n = 9). Overall, 70% of patients in Study 1 and 81% of patients receiving INCB054707 in Study 2 experienced at least one treatment‐emergent adverse event; 30% and 42% of patients, respectively, had at least one treatment‐related adverse event. Among the evaluable patients, three (43%) in Study 1 and 17 (65% overall: 30 mg, 56%; 60 mg, 56%; 90 mg, 88%) receiving INCB054707 vs. 4 patients (57%) receiving placebo in Study 2 achieved HiSCR at week 8.

Conclusions

INCB054707 was well tolerated, with responses observed in patients with moderate‐to‐severe HS. The safety and efficacy findings from these studies demonstrate proof of concept for JAK1 inhibition in HS. The studies are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03569371 and NCT03607487).