FamilyPso - a new questionnaire to assess the impact of psoriasis on partners and family of patients

Psoriasis and its impact on close relatives and partners of patients - A cross-sectional questionnaire study

Background

Little is known about the exact impact of psoriasis on the disease burden of close relatives and partners of those affected by the disease.

Objectives

The aim of this single-centre cross-sectional study was to evaluate the quality of life in psoriasis patients and the impact of disease on partners and close relatives.

Methods

250 plaque-type psoriasis patients (58.4% males and 41.6% females) with mostly treatment-controlled disease (mean PASI of 1.7 and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 4.1) were recruited from the Psoriasis Registry Austria (PsoRA) and their close relatives and partners were invited to participate in the study. Patient Family Impact Score (PFIS) was calculated from the FamilyPso questionnaire data to establish categories of disease burden in close relatives and partners.

Results

Valid FamilyPso questionnaires were returned from 153 (61.2%) close relatives and partners. Correlation analysis revealed a significant association between PASI and DLQI (r = 0.512, p < 0.001), PASI and PFIS (r = 0.228, p = 0.006), and DLQI and PFIS (r = 0.210, p = 0.014). An at least small or larger impairment of life quality (DLQI ≥ 2) was observed in 46.7% of psoriasis patients, despite treatment. A small or larger disease burden was detected in nearly 78.7% of the male and 77.3% of the female relatives and partners quantified with categorized PFIS.

Conclusions

The study revealed a significant impact of patients' psoriasis on the disease burden of close relatives and partners, depending on the severity of PASI and extent of quality of life disruption in patients. The gender of the relatives and partners had no impact on the PFIS.

Patient-reported well-being in value-based care using tildrakizumab in a real-world setting: protocol of a multinational, phase IV, 1-cohort prospective observational study (the POSITIVE study)

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that negatively impacts the quality of life of patients and their families. However, the most commonly used decision-making tools in psoriasis, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), do not fully capture the impact of psoriasis on patients' lives. In contrast, the well-established 5-item WHO Well-being Index (WHO-5) assesses the subjective psychological well-being of patients. Moreover, while drug innovations became available for psoriasis, data on the impact of these therapies on patients' lives and their closest environment (family, physicians) are limited. This study will assess the effect of tildrakizumab, an interleukin-23p19 inhibitor, on the overall well-being of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Moreover, the long-term benefit of tildrakizumab on physicians' satisfaction and partners' lives of patients with psoriasis will be evaluated.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This non-interventional, prospective, observational, real-world evidence study will involve multiple sites in Europe and approximately 500 adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with tildrakizumab. Each patient will be followed for 24 months. The primary endpoint is well-being measured by the WHO-5 questionnaire. Key secondary endpoints include Physician's Satisfaction and partner's quality of life (FamilyPso). Other endpoints will evaluate skin-generic quality of life (DLQI-R), Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9), Treatment-related Patient Benefit Index 'Standard', 10 items (PBI-S-10) and work productivity and activity impairment due to psoriasis (WPAI:PSO). Statistical analyses will be based on observed cases. Multiple imputations will be performed as a sensitivity analysis, and adverse events will be reported.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study will be conducted according to the protocol, which received ethics committee approval and applicable regulatory requirements of each participating country. The results will be disseminated through scientific publications and congress presentations.

TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04823247 (Pre-results).

Systematic review of psychosocial needs assessment tools for caregivers of paediatric patients with dermatological conditions

OBJECTIVE

To identify validated dermatology-specific and disease-specific psychosocial needs assessment tools for caregivers of paediatric patients with dermatological conditions. A secondary objective was to assess the adequacy of their measurement properties.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

EMBASE, PsycINFO, MEDLINE (in Ovid SP), Cochrane, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health EBSCO, U Search and Web of Science were searched (2000-5 October 2021). Grey literature, bibliographies, online databases of QoL tools and several trial registers were searched (2000-5 Oct 2021).

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Eligible studies involved adult caregivers caring for a child (no age limit) with any form of any skin condition. Predetermined exclusion criteria, as per protocol, were applied to the search results.

DATA ABSTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Title, abstract, full-text screening and data abstraction (standardised forms) were done independently in duplicate. Both's predefined methodological criteria assessed risk of bias. Narrative synthesis was used to present the findings.

RESULTS

187 full-text articles were examined from a total of 8979 records. Most tools were generic QoL tools, relevant to spouse/partner or based on their child's perception of the disease or assessed patients' quality of life. Following quality appraisal, 26 articles were identified, and 11 tools (1 dermatology-specific and 10 disease-specific) were included. Information outcome domains were provided for each tool (study specific, questionnaire specific, adequacy of measurement properties and risk of bias). No literature was found pertaining to the use of these tools within healthcare settings and/or as e-tools.

DISCUSSION

With limited evidence supporting the quality of their methodological and measurement properties, this review will inform future dermatological Core Outcome Set development and improve evidence-based clinical decisions. Increasing demand on limited healthcare resources justifies the codevelopment of an accessible solution-focused psychosocial needs assessment e-tool to promote caregiver health outcomes.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO (CRD42019159956).

Family reported outcomes, an unmet need in the management of a patient's disease: appraisal of the literature

BACKGROUND

A person's chronic health condition or disability can have a huge impact on the quality of life (QoL) of the whole family, but this important impact is often ignored. This literature review aims to understand the impact of patients' disease on family members across all medical specialities, and appraise existing generic and disease-specific family quality of life (QoL) measures.

METHODS

The databases Medline, EMBASE, CINHAL, ASSIA, PsycINFO and Scopus were searched for original articles in English measuring the impact of health conditions on patients' family members/partner using a valid instrument.

RESULTS

Of 114 articles screened, 86 met the inclusion criteria. They explored the impact of a relative's disease on 14,661 family members, mostly 'parents' or 'mothers', using 50 different instruments across 18 specialities including neurology, oncology and dermatology, in 33 countries including the USA, China and Australia. These studies revealed a huge impact of patients' illness on family members. An appraisal of family QoL instruments identified 48 instruments, 42 disease/speciality specific and six generic measures. Five of the six generics are aimed at carers of children, people with disability or restricted to chronic disease. The only generic instrument that measures the impact of any condition on family members across all specialities is the Family Reported Outcome Measure (FROM-16). Although most instruments demonstrated good reliability and validity, only 11 reported responsiveness and only one reported the minimal clinically important difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Family members' QoL is greatly impacted by a relative's condition. To support family members, there is a need for a generic tool that offers flexibility and brevity for use in clinical settings across all areas of medicine. FROM-16 could be the tool of choice, provided its robustness is demonstrated with further validation of its psychometric properties.

Family vitiligo impact scale: A scale to measure the quality-of-life of family members of patients with vitiligo

BACKGROUND

Vitiligo places a significant psycho-social burden on caregivers and family members.

AIMS

The aim of the study was to develop and preliminarily validate a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of vitiligo on adult family members.

METHODS

Themes that emerged from qualitative interviews and a focus group discussion with family members were used to generate items for a preliminary scale, followed by pre-testing and scale development. The new scale was then tested with two comparator scales and a global question.

RESULTS

A preliminary scale with 32 items was pilot tested on 30 participants. Following this, the scale was condensed to 16 items in 12 domains that were administered to 159 participants. Scale scores ranged from 0 to 48 with a mean of 19.75 ± 12.41. The scale had excellent internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.92 (0.70-0.95) and also showed good test-retest reliability at two weeks (r = 0.946). The scale showed criterion, convergent and known group validity.

LIMITATIONS

It was conducted in a large teaching hospital which may have resulted in selection of patients with persistent or progressive disease and more worried family members. Vitiligo is highly stigmatized in our country and the performance of the scale may need to be evaluated in other communities and cultures as well where stigma is less oppressive.

CONCLUSION

Family Vitiligo Impact Scale appears to be an easy-to-complete, reliable and valid instrument to measure the psychosocial impact of vitiligo in family members of patients. It may be useful as an outcome measure in both clinical and research settings.

Comparison of the impact of childhood psoriasis on mothers' and fathers' quality of life - does gender of a caregiver play a role?

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a chronic skin condition that in one third of cases starts in the first two decades of life. The disease might impact the quality of life (QoL) of the affected children and their caregivers. The issue of gender differences in the assessment of psychological burden of dermatological conditions has been the subject of few studies with contradictory results.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in the impact of childhood psoriasis on mothers' and fathers' well-being using Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI).

METHODS

Forty-five children with psoriasis (31 girls and 14 boys; mean age ± standard deviation (SD) 10.53 ± 3.44 years) and their parents (45 mothers and 45 fathers) were included in the study. Both parents of each child were asked to separately fill in the validated Polish version of the FDLQI questionnaire.

RESULTS

Comparing the FDLQI scores, the QoL of mothers was significantly more impaired than the QoL of fathers (13.44 ± 6.46 versus 9.53 ± 6.12 points; P < 0.0001). In mothers, childhood psoriasis had a significantly greater impact in the areas of emotional distress (P = 0.007), dealing with other people's reactions (P < 0.0001), social life (P = 0.02), amount of time spent caring for the child's skin (P = 0.0001) and extra housework (P = 0.0005), compared to fathers. The FDLQI scores of both mothers and fathers were independent of the impairment of children's QoL or the severity of psoriasis, except for positive correlation between mothers' FDLQI scores and children's BSA (R = 0.31; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in the impact of childhood skin diseases on mothers' and fathers' well-being should be taken into consideration while developing educational programmes for patients and their families. There is a need for further, multi-centre research that would take into account geographical and cultural differences, in order to reliably assess the impact of childhood psoriasis on various aspects of caregivers' QoL.

Palliative care in dermatology: A clinical primer, review of the literature, and needs assessment

Palliative care has been shown to improve quality of life, symptoms, and caregiver burden for a range of life-limiting diseases. Palliative care use among patients with severe dermatologic disease remains relatively unexplored, but the limited available data suggest significant unmet care needs and low rates of palliative care use. This review summarizes current palliative care patterns in dermatology, identifying areas for improvement and future investigation.

Impact of patient psoriasis on partner quality of life, sexuality and empathy feelings: a study in 183 couples

BACKGROUND

The impact of psoriasis on quality of life (QoL), sexuality and empathy requires better understanding in patient-partner relationships.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the influence of psoriasis on partner QoL, presence of sexual dysfunction (SDy) in couples and empathy in partners of psoriasis patients.

METHODS

A total of 183 adult psoriasis patients and their partners participated in this observational, cross-sectional and non-comparative study. Severity of psoriasis was measured using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index. Patient QoL was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index and the Short Form-12 (SF12). The impact of psoriasis on partner QoL was measured with the Family Pso and the SF12. Presence of SDy and empathy in partners were assessed using the Family Pso.

RESULTS

Overall, 49.7% of the patients had moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Patient psoriasis severity and patient QoL were correlated with partner psychological distress. The largest QoL impairment was observed in female patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. The stronger QoL alteration observed in female psoriasis patients, compared to their partners, was not observed in male psoriasis patients vs. their partners. There was no relationship between partner QoL and patient age and duration of psoriasis. Most patients, but less than half of the partners, reported SDy with age being a being a significantly more important impacting factor than disease severity. Both psoriasis clinical severity and/or a significant impact on QoL were associated factors for SDy in male partners of psoriasis women, but not in female partners of psoriatic men. Reporting empathy was higher among young male partners of psoriasis patients. In both male and female partners, patient psoriasis clinical severity was not associated with empathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Psoriasis impact on patient-partner QoL, sexuality and empathy should be considered more thoroughly by dermatologists when formulating treatment plans and making treatment decisions.