1
|
Gross M, Dunthorn M, Mauvisseau Q, Stoeck T. Using digital PCR to predict ciliate abundance from ribosomal RNA gene copy numbers. Environ Microbiol 2024; 26:e16619. [PMID: 38649189 DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.16619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Ciliates play a key role in most ecosystems. Their abundance in natural samples is crucial for answering many ecological questions. Traditional methods of quantifying individual species, which rely on microscopy, are often labour-intensive, time-consuming and can be highly biassed. As a result, we investigated the potential of digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) for quantifying ciliates. A significant challenge in this process is the high variation in the copy number of the taxonomic marker gene (ribosomal RNA [rRNA]). We first quantified the rRNA gene copy numbers (GCN) of the model ciliate, Paramecium tetraurelia, during different stages of the cell cycle and growth phases. The per-cell rRNA GCN varied between approximately 11,000 and 130,000, averaging around 50,000 copies per cell. Despite these variations in per-cell rRNA GCN, we found a highly significant correlation between GCN and cell numbers. This is likely due to the coexistence of different cellular stages in an uncontrolled (environmental) ciliate population. Thanks to the high sensitivity of dPCR, we were able to detect the target gene in a sample that contained only a single cell. The dPCR approach presented here is a valuable addition to the molecular toolbox in protistan ecology. It may guide future studies in quantifying and monitoring the abundance of targeted (even rare) ciliates in natural samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Gross
- Ecology Group, Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Micah Dunthorn
- Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Thorsten Stoeck
- Ecology Group, Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Antil S, Abraham JS, Sripoorna S, Maurya S, Dagar J, Makhija S, Bhagat P, Gupta R, Sood U, Lal R, Toteja R. DNA barcoding, an effective tool for species identification: a review. Mol Biol Rep 2023; 50:761-775. [PMID: 36308581 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-022-08015-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
DNA barcoding is a powerful taxonomic tool to identify and discover species. DNA barcoding utilizes one or more standardized short DNA regions for taxon identification. With the emergence of new sequencing techniques, such as Next-generation sequencing (NGS), ONT MinION nanopore sequencing, and Pac Bio sequencing, DNA barcoding has become more accurate, fast, and reliable. Rapid species identification by DNA barcodes has been used in a variety of fields, including forensic science, control of the food supply chain, and disease understanding. The Consortium for Barcode of Life (CBOL) presents various working groups to identify the universal barcode gene, such as COI in metazoans; rbcL, matK, and ITS in plants; ITS in fungi; 16S rRNA gene in bacteria and archaea, and creating a reference DNA barcode library. In this article, an attempt has been made to analyze the various proposed DNA barcode for different organisms, strengths & limitations, recent advancements in DNA barcoding, and methods to speed up the DNA barcode reference library construction. This study concludes that constructing a reference library with high species coverage would be a major step toward identifying species by DNA barcodes. This can be achieved in a short period of time by using advanced sequencing and data analysis methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep Antil
- Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | | | - S Sripoorna
- Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Swati Maurya
- Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Jyoti Dagar
- Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Seema Makhija
- Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Pooja Bhagat
- Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Renu Gupta
- Maitreyi College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, 110 021, India
| | - Utkarsh Sood
- The Energy and Resources Institute, IHC Complex, New Delhi, 110003, India
| | - Rup Lal
- The Energy and Resources Institute, IHC Complex, New Delhi, 110003, India
| | - Ravi Toteja
- Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oladi M, Leontidou K, Stoeck T, Shokri MR. Environmental DNA-based profiling of benthic bacterial and eukaryote communities along a crude oil spill gradient in a coral reef in the Persian Gulf. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN 2022; 184:114143. [PMID: 36182786 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Coral reef ecosystems in the Persian Gulf are frequently exposed to crude oil spills. We investigated benthic bacterial and eukaryote community structures at such coral reef sites subjected to different degrees of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) pollution using environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding. Both bacterial and eukaryote communities responded with pronounced shifts to crude oil pollution and distinguished control sites, moderately and heavily impacted sites with significant confidentiality. The observed community patterns were predominantly driven by Alphaproteobacteria and metazoans. Among these, we identified individual genera that were previously linked to oil spill stress, but also taxa, for which a link to hydrocarbon still remains to be established. Considering the lack of an early-warning system for the environmental status of coral reef ecosystems exposed to frequent crude-oil spills, our results encourage further research towards the development of an eDNA-based biomonitoring tool that exploits benthic bacterial and eukaryote communities as bioindicators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahshid Oladi
- Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Ecology Group, Kaiserslautern, Germany; Department of Animal Sciences and Marine Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shahid Beheshti University, G.C., Evin, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kleopatra Leontidou
- Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Ecology Group, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Thorsten Stoeck
- Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Ecology Group, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Mohammad Reza Shokri
- Department of Animal Sciences and Marine Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shahid Beheshti University, G.C., Evin, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pawlowski J, Bruce K, Panksep K, Aguirre FI, Amalfitano S, Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L, Baussant T, Bouchez A, Carugati L, Cermakova K, Cordier T, Corinaldesi C, Costa FO, Danovaro R, Dell'Anno A, Duarte S, Eisendle U, Ferrari BJD, Frontalini F, Frühe L, Haegerbaeumer A, Kisand V, Krolicka A, Lanzén A, Leese F, Lejzerowicz F, Lyautey E, Maček I, Sagova-Marečková M, Pearman JK, Pochon X, Stoeck T, Vivien R, Weigand A, Fazi S. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2022; 818:151783. [PMID: 34801504 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding (parallel sequencing of DNA/RNA for identification of whole communities within a targeted group) is revolutionizing the field of aquatic biomonitoring. To date, most metabarcoding studies aiming to assess the ecological status of aquatic ecosystems have focused on water eDNA and macroinvertebrate bulk samples. However, the eDNA metabarcoding has also been applied to soft sediment samples, mainly for assessing microbial or meiofaunal biota. Compared to classical methodologies based on manual sorting and morphological identification of benthic taxa, eDNA metabarcoding offers potentially important advantages for assessing the environmental quality of sediments. The methods and protocols utilized for sediment eDNA metabarcoding can vary considerably among studies, and standardization efforts are needed to improve their robustness, comparability and use within regulatory frameworks. Here, we review the available information on eDNA metabarcoding applied to sediment samples, with a focus on sampling, preservation, and DNA extraction steps. We discuss challenges specific to sediment eDNA analysis, including the variety of different sources and states of eDNA and its persistence in the sediment. This paper aims to identify good-practice strategies and facilitate method harmonization for routine use of sediment eDNA in future benthic monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Pawlowski
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 81-712 Sopot, Poland; ID-Gene Ecodiagnostics, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - K Bruce
- NatureMetrics Ltd, CABI Site, Bakeham Lane, Egham TW20 9TY, UK
| | - K Panksep
- Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu 50411, Estonia; Chair of Hydrobiology and Fishery, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia; Chair of Aquaculture, Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Estonia
| | - F I Aguirre
- Water Research Institute, National Research Council of Italy (IRSA-CNR), Monterotondo, Rome, Italy
| | - S Amalfitano
- Water Research Institute, National Research Council of Italy (IRSA-CNR), Monterotondo, Rome, Italy
| | - L Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; ID-Gene Ecodiagnostics, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - T Baussant
- Norwegian Research Center AS, NORCE Environment, Marine Ecology Group, Mekjarvik 12, 4070 Randaberg, Norway
| | - A Bouchez
- INRAE, CARRTEL, 74200 Thonon-les-Bains, France
| | - L Carugati
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy
| | - K Cermakova
- ID-Gene Ecodiagnostics, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - T Cordier
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; NORCE Climate, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Jahnebakken 5, 5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - C Corinaldesi
- Department of Materials, Environmental Sciences and Urban Planning, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy
| | - F O Costa
- Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology (CBMA), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio-Sustainability (IB-S), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
| | - R Danovaro
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy
| | - A Dell'Anno
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, Ancona 60131, Italy
| | - S Duarte
- Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology (CBMA), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio-Sustainability (IB-S), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
| | - U Eisendle
- University of Salzburg, Dept. of Biosciences, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - B J D Ferrari
- Swiss Centre for Applied Ecotoxicology (Ecotox Centre), EPFL ENAC IIE-GE, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - F Frontalini
- Department of Pure and Applied Sciences, Urbino University, Urbino, Italy
| | - L Frühe
- Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Ecology Group, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - A Haegerbaeumer
- Bielefeld University, Animal Ecology, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
| | - V Kisand
- Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu 50411, Estonia
| | - A Krolicka
- Norwegian Research Center AS, NORCE Environment, Marine Ecology Group, Mekjarvik 12, 4070 Randaberg, Norway
| | - A Lanzén
- AZTI, Marine Research, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Pasaia, Gipuzkoa, Spain; IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - F Leese
- University of Duisburg-Essen, Faculty of Biology, Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Germany
| | - F Lejzerowicz
- Center for Microbiome Innovation, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - E Lyautey
- Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, INRAE, CARRTEL, 74200 Thonon-les-Bains, France
| | - I Maček
- Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies (FAMNIT), University of Primorska, Glagoljaška 8, 6000 Koper, Slovenia
| | - M Sagova-Marečková
- Czech University of Life Sciences, Dept. of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J K Pearman
- Coastal and Freshwater Group, Cawthron Institute, Private Bag 2, Nelson 7042, New Zealand
| | - X Pochon
- Coastal and Freshwater Group, Cawthron Institute, Private Bag 2, Nelson 7042, New Zealand; Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Warkworth 0941, New Zealand
| | - T Stoeck
- Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Ecology Group, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - R Vivien
- Swiss Centre for Applied Ecotoxicology (Ecotox Centre), EPFL ENAC IIE-GE, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - A Weigand
- National Museum of Natural History Luxembourg, 25 Rue Münster, L-2160 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - S Fazi
- Water Research Institute, National Research Council of Italy (IRSA-CNR), Monterotondo, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Evaluating eDNA for Use within Marine Environmental Impact Assessments. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/jmse10030375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
In this review, the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) within Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is evaluated. EIA documents provide information required by regulators to evaluate the potential impact of a development project. Currently eDNA is being incorporated into biodiversity assessments as a complementary method for detecting rare, endangered or invasive species. However, questions have been raised regarding the maturity of the field and the suitability of eDNA information as evidence for EIA. Several key issues are identified for eDNA information within a generic EIA framework for marine environments. First, it is challenging to define the sampling unit and optimal sampling strategy for eDNA with respect to the project area and potential impact receptor. Second, eDNA assay validation protocols are preliminary at this time. Third, there are statistical issues around the probability of obtaining both false positives (identification of taxa that are not present) and false negatives (non-detection of taxa that are present) in results. At a minimum, an EIA must quantify the uncertainty in presence/absence estimates by combining series of Bernoulli trials with ad hoc occupancy models. Finally, the fate and transport of DNA fragments is largely unknown in environmental systems. Shedding dynamics, biogeochemical and physical processes that influence DNA fragments must be better understood to be able to link an eDNA signal with the receptor’s state. The biggest challenge is that eDNA is a proxy for the receptor and not a direct measure of presence. Nonetheless, as more actors enter the field, technological solutions are likely to emerge for these issues. Environmental DNA already shows great promise for baseline descriptions of the presence of species surrounding a project and can aid in the identification of potential receptors for EIA monitoring using other methods.
Collapse
|
6
|
Weisse T, Montagnes DJS. Ecology of planktonic ciliates in a changing world: Concepts, methods, and challenges. J Eukaryot Microbiol 2021; 69:e12879. [PMID: 34877743 PMCID: PMC9542165 DOI: 10.1111/jeu.12879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Plankton ecologists ultimately focus on forecasting, both applied and environmental outcomes. We review how appreciating planktonic ciliates has become central to these predictions. We explore the 350‐year‐old canon on planktonic ciliates and examine its steady progression, which has been punctuated by conceptual insights and technological breakthroughs. By reflecting on this process, we offer suggestions as to where future leaps are needed, with an emphasis on predicting outcomes of global warming. We conclude that in terms of climate change research: (i) climatic hotspots (e.g. polar oceans) require attention; (ii) simply adding ciliate measurements to zooplankton/phytoplankton‐based sampling programs is inappropriate; (iii) elucidating the rare biosphere's functional ecology requires culture‐independent genetic methods; (iv) evaluating genetic adaptation (microevolution) and population composition shifts is required; (v) contrasting marine and freshwaters needs attention; (vi) mixotrophy needs attention; (vii) laboratory and field studies must couple automated measurements and molecular assessment of functional gene expression; (viii) ciliate trophic diversity requires appreciation; and (ix) marrying gene expression and function, coupled with climate change scenarios is needed. In short, continued academic efforts and financial support are essential to achieve the above; these will lead to understanding how ciliates will respond to climate change, providing tools for forecasting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Weisse
- Research Department for Limnology, University of Innsbruck, Mondsee, Austria
| | - David J S Montagnes
- Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Behaviour, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dully V, Rech G, Wilding TA, Lanzén A, MacKichan K, Berrill I, Stoeck T. Comparing sediment preservation methods for genomic biomonitoring of coastal marine ecosystems. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN 2021; 173:113129. [PMID: 34784523 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
To avoid loss of genetic information in environmental DNA (eDNA) field samples, the preservation of nucleic acids during field sampling is a critical step. In the development of standard operating procedures (SOPs) for eDNA-based compliance monitoring, the effect of different routinely used sediment preservations on biological community structures serving as bioindicators has gone untested. We compared eDNA metabarcoding results of marine bacterial communities from sample aliquots that were treated with a nucleic acid preservation solution (treated samples) and aliquots that were frozen without further treatment (non-treated samples). Sediment samples were obtained from coastal locations subjected to different stressors (aquaculture, urbanization, industry). DNA extraction efficiency, bacterial community profiles, and measures of alpha- and beta-diversity were highly congruent between treated and non-treated samples. As both preservation methods provide the same relevant information to environmental managers and regulators, we recommend the inclusion of both methods into SOPs for biomonitoring in marine coastal environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Dully
- Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Ecology, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Giulia Rech
- Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Ecology, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Thomas A Wilding
- Scottish Association for Marine Science, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Anders Lanzén
- AZTI, Marine Research, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Pasaia, Gipuzkoa, Spain; IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain
| | | | - Iain Berrill
- Scottish Salmon Producers Organization, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Thorsten Stoeck
- Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Ecology, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu W, McManus GB, Lin X, Huang H, Zhang W, Tan Y. Distribution Patterns of Ciliate Diversity in the South China Sea. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:689688. [PMID: 34539599 PMCID: PMC8446678 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.689688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Ciliates are abundant microplankton that are widely distributed in the ocean. In this paper, the distribution patterns of ciliate diversity in the South China Sea (SCS) were analyzed by compiling community data from previous publications. Based on morphological identification, a total of 592 ciliate species have been recorded in the SCS. The ciliate communities in intertidal, neritic and oceanic water areas were compared in terms of taxonomy, motility and feeding habit composition, respectively. Significant community variation was revealed among the three areas, but the difference between the intertidal area and the other two areas was more significant than that between neritic and oceanic areas. The distributions of ciliates within each of the three areas were also analyzed. In the intertidal water, the community was not significantly different among sites but did differ among habitat types. In neritic and oceanic areas, the spatial variation of communities among different sites was clearly observed. Comparison of communities by taxonomic and ecological traits (motility and feeding habit) indicated that these traits similarly revealed the geographical pattern of ciliates on a large scale in the SCS, but to distinguish the community variation on a local scale, taxonomic traits has higher resolution than ecological traits. In addition, we assessed the relative influences of environmental and spatial factors on assembly of ciliate communities in the SCS and found that environmental selection is the major process structuring the taxonomic composition in intertidal water, while spatial processes played significant roles in influencing the taxonomic composition in neritic and oceanic water. Among ecological traits, environmental selection had the most important impact on distributions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiwei Liu
- Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China
- Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, China
| | - George B. McManus
- Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT, United States
| | - Xiaofeng Lin
- Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Coastal and Wetland Ecosystem, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Honghui Huang
- Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, P. R. China, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenjing Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Marine Biodiversity and Global Change Research Center, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Yehui Tan
- Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China
- Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rajter Ľ, Dunthorn M. Ciliate SSU-rDNA reference alignments and trees for phylogenetic placements of metabarcoding data. METABARCODING AND METAGENOMICS 2021. [DOI: 10.3897/mbmg.5.69602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Although ciliates are one of the most dominant microbial eukaryotic groups in many environments, there is a lack of updated global ciliate alignments and reference trees that can be used for phylogenetic placement methods to analyze environmental metabarcoding data. Here we fill this gap by providing reference alignments and trees for those ciliates taxa with available SSU-rDNA sequences derived from identified species. Each alignment contains 478 ciliate and six outgroup taxa, and they were made using different masking strategies for alignment positions (unmasked, masked and masked except the hypervariable V4 region). We constrained the monophyly of the major ciliate groups based on the recently updated classification of protists and based on phylogenomic data. Taxa of uncertain phylogenetic position were kept unconstrained, except for Mesodinium species that we constrained to form a clade with the Litostomatea. These ciliate reference alignments and trees can be used to perform taxonomic assignments of metabarcoding data, discover novel ciliate clades, estimate species richness, and overlay measured ecological parameters onto the phylogenetic placements.
Collapse
|
10
|
Frühe L, Dully V, Forster D, Keeley NB, Laroche O, Pochon X, Robinson S, Wilding TA, Stoeck T. Global Trends of Benthic Bacterial Diversity and Community Composition Along Organic Enrichment Gradients of Salmon Farms. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:637811. [PMID: 33995296 PMCID: PMC8116884 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.637811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The analysis of benthic bacterial community structure has emerged as a powerful alternative to traditional microscopy-based taxonomic approaches to monitor aquaculture disturbance in coastal environments. However, local bacterial diversity and community composition vary with season, biogeographic region, hydrology, sediment texture, and aquafarm-specific parameters. Therefore, without an understanding of the inherent variation contained within community complexes, bacterial diversity surveys conducted at individual farms, countries, or specific seasons may not be able to infer global universal pictures of bacterial community diversity and composition at different degrees of aquaculture disturbance. We have analyzed environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcodes (V3-V4 region of the hypervariable SSU rRNA gene) of 138 samples of different farms located in different major salmon-producing countries. For these samples, we identified universal bacterial core taxa that indicate high, moderate, and low aquaculture impact, regardless of sampling season, sampled country, seafloor substrate type, or local farming and environmental conditions. We also discuss bacterial taxon groups that are specific for individual local conditions. We then link the metabolic properties of the identified bacterial taxon groups to benthic processes, which provides a better understanding of universal benthic ecosystem function(ing) of coastal aquaculture sites. Our results may further guide the continuing development of a practical and generic bacterial eDNA-based environmental monitoring approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa Frühe
- Ecology Group, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Verena Dully
- Ecology Group, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Dominik Forster
- Ecology Group, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Nigel B Keeley
- Biosecurity, Coastal and Freshwater Group, Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.,Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway
| | - Olivier Laroche
- Biosecurity, Coastal and Freshwater Group, Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand
| | - Xavier Pochon
- Biosecurity, Coastal and Freshwater Group, Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.,Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Shawn Robinson
- St. Andrews Biological Station, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, St. Andrews, NB, Canada
| | | | - Thorsten Stoeck
- Ecology Group, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dully V, Wilding TA, Mühlhaus T, Stoeck T. Identifying the minimum amplicon sequence depth to adequately predict classes in eDNA-based marine biomonitoring using supervised machine learning. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2021; 19:2256-2268. [PMID: 33995917 PMCID: PMC8093828 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Environmental DNA metabarcoding is a powerful approach for use in biomonitoring and impact assessments. Amplicon-based eDNA sequence data are characteristically highly divergent in sequencing depth (total reads per sample) as influenced inter alia by the number of samples simultaneously analyzed per sequencing run. The random forest (RF) machine learning algorithm has been successfully employed to accurately classify unknown samples into monitoring categories. To employ RF to eDNA data, and avoid sequencing-depth artifacts, sequence data across samples are normalized using rarefaction, a process that inherently loses information. The aim of this study was to inform future sampling designs in terms of the relationship between sampling depth and RF accuracy. We analyzed three published and one new bacterial amplicon datasets, using a RF, based initially on the maximal rarefied data available (minimum mean of > 30,000 reads across all datasets) to give our baseline performance. We then evaluated the RF classification success based on increasingly rarefied datasets. We found that extreme to moderate rarefaction (50-5000 sequences per sample) was sufficient to achieve prediction performance commensurate to the full data, depending on the classification task. We did not find that the number of classification classes, data balance across classes, or the total number of sequences or samples, were associated with predictive accuracy. We identified the ability of the training data to adequately characterize the classes being mapped as the most important criterion and discuss how this finding can inform future sampling design for eDNA based biomonitoring to reduce costs and computation time.
Collapse
Key Words
- 16S rRNA
- AMBI, AZTI's marine biotic index
- ASV, Amplicon Sequence Variants
- AZE, allowable zone of effect, intermediate impact zone
- BI, biotic index
- BallWa, ballast water dataset
- BasCo, Basque coast dataset
- Biomonitoring
- CE, cage edge
- CV, Coefficient of Variance
- DADA2, Divisive Amplicon Denoising Algorithm
- EQ, environmental quality
- Environmental DNA
- FM, full model
- MDS, multidimensional scaling
- Machine learning
- Marine
- NEB, New England Biolabs
- NW, north west
- NorSa, Norway salmon dataset
- OOB-error, out-of-bag error estimate
- PCR, polymerase chain reaction
- REF, reference site
- RF, random forest algorithm
- SML, supervised machine learning
- ScoSa, Scottish salmon farm dataset
- V3-V4, hypervariable gene regions of the 16s rRNA
- bp, base pairs
- eDNA, environmental deoxyribonucleic acid
- microgAMBI, AZTI's marine biotic index based on microbial genes
- mtry, numbers of variables tried at each split
- n, number
- rRNA, small subunit prokaryotic ribosomal ribonucleic acid
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Dully
- Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Ecology, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Thomas A. Wilding
- Scottish Association for Marine Science, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Timo Mühlhaus
- Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Computational Systems Biology, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Thorsten Stoeck
- Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Ecology, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
- Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sagova-Mareckova M, Boenigk J, Bouchez A, Cermakova K, Chonova T, Cordier T, Eisendle U, Elersek T, Fazi S, Fleituch T, Frühe L, Gajdosova M, Graupner N, Haegerbaeumer A, Kelly AM, Kopecky J, Leese F, Nõges P, Orlic S, Panksep K, Pawlowski J, Petrusek A, Piggott JJ, Rusch JC, Salis R, Schenk J, Simek K, Stovicek A, Strand DA, Vasquez MI, Vrålstad T, Zlatkovic S, Zupancic M, Stoeck T. Expanding ecological assessment by integrating microorganisms into routine freshwater biomonitoring. WATER RESEARCH 2021; 191:116767. [PMID: 33418487 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/19/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Bioindication has become an indispensable part of water quality monitoring in most countries of the world, with the presence and abundance of bioindicator taxa, mostly multicellular eukaryotes, used for biotic indices. In contrast, microbes (bacteria, archaea and protists) are seldom used as bioindicators in routine assessments, although they have been recognized for their importance in environmental processes. Recently, the use of molecular methods has revealed unexpected diversity within known functional groups and novel metabolic pathways that are particularly important in energy and nutrient cycling. In various habitats, microbial communities respond to eutrophication, metals, and natural or anthropogenic organic pollutants through changes in diversity and function. In this review, we evaluated the common trends in these changes, documenting that they have value as bioindicators and can be used not only for monitoring but also for improving our understanding of the major processes in lotic and lentic environments. Current knowledge provides a solid foundation for exploiting microbial taxa, community structures and diversity, as well as functional genes, in novel monitoring programs. These microbial community measures can also be combined into biotic indices, improving the resolution of individual bioindicators. Here, we assess particular molecular approaches complemented by advanced bioinformatic analysis, as these are the most promising with respect to detailed bioindication value. We conclude that microbial community dynamics are a missing link important for our understanding of rapid changes in the structure and function of aquatic ecosystems, and should be addressed in the future environmental monitoring of freshwater ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Sagova-Mareckova
- Dept. of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, 16500, Czechia.
| | - J Boenigk
- Biodiversity, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitaetsstraße 5, 45141 Essen, Germany
| | - A Bouchez
- UMR CARRTEL, INRAE, UMR Carrtel, 75 av. de Corzent, FR-74203 Thonon les Bains cedex, France; University Savoie Mont-Blanc, UMR CARRTEL, FR-73370 Le Bourget du Lac, France
| | - K Cermakova
- ID-Gene Ecodiagnostics, Campus Biotech Innovation Park, 15, av. Sécheron, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - T Chonova
- UMR CARRTEL, INRAE, UMR Carrtel, 75 av. de Corzent, FR-74203 Thonon les Bains cedex, France; University Savoie Mont-Blanc, UMR CARRTEL, FR-73370 Le Bourget du Lac, France
| | - T Cordier
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Science III, 4 Boulevard d'Yvoy, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - U Eisendle
- University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstraße 34, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - T Elersek
- National Institute of Biology, Vecna pot 111, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - S Fazi
- Water Research Institute, National Research Council of Italy (IRSA-CNR), Via Salaria km 29,300 - C.P. 10, 00015 Monterotondo St., Rome, Italy
| | - T Fleituch
- Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Adama Mickiewicza 33, 31-120 Krakow, Poland
| | - L Frühe
- Ecology Group, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - M Gajdosova
- Dept. of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 12844 Prague, Czechia
| | - N Graupner
- Biodiversity, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitaetsstraße 5, 45141 Essen, Germany
| | - A Haegerbaeumer
- Dept. of Animal Ecology, Bielefeld University, Konsequenz 45, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
| | - A-M Kelly
- School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, D02 PN40, Ireland
| | - J Kopecky
- Epidemiology and Ecology of Microoganisms, Crop Research Institute, Drnovská 507, 16106 Prague 6, Czechia
| | - F Leese
- Biodiversity, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitaetsstraße 5, 45141 Essen, Germany; Aquatic Ecosystem Resarch, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitaetsstrasse 5 D-45141 Essen, Germany
| | - P Nõges
- Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, Tartu 51006, Estonia
| | - S Orlic
- Institute Ruđer Bošković, Bijenička 54, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; Center of Excellence for Science and Technology Integrating Mediterranean, Bijenička 54,10 000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - K Panksep
- Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, Tartu 51006, Estonia
| | - J Pawlowski
- ID-Gene Ecodiagnostics, Campus Biotech Innovation Park, 15, av. Sécheron, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Science III, 4 Boulevard d'Yvoy, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland; Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Powstańców Warszawy 55, 81-712 Sopot, Poland
| | - A Petrusek
- Dept. of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 12844 Prague, Czechia
| | - J J Piggott
- School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, D02 PN40, Ireland
| | - J C Rusch
- Norwegian Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 750, Sentrum, NO-0106 Oslo, Norway; Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066, Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - R Salis
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Lund University, Sölvegatan 37, 223 62 Lund, Sweden
| | - J Schenk
- Dept. of Animal Ecology, Bielefeld University, Konsequenz 45, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
| | - K Simek
- Institute of Hydrobiology, Biology Centre CAS, Branišovská 31, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czechia
| | - A Stovicek
- Dept. of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, 16500, Czechia
| | - D A Strand
- Norwegian Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 750, Sentrum, NO-0106 Oslo, Norway
| | - M I Vasquez
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Cyprus University of Technology, 30 Arch. Kyprianos Str., 3036 Limassol, Cyprus
| | - T Vrålstad
- Norwegian Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 750, Sentrum, NO-0106 Oslo, Norway
| | - S Zlatkovic
- Ministry of Environmental Protection, Omladinskih brigada 1, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia; Agency "Akvatorija", 11. krajiške divizije 49, 11090 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - M Zupancic
- National Institute of Biology, Vecna pot 111, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - T Stoeck
- Ecology Group, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Broman E, Bonaglia S, Norkko A, Creer S, Nascimento FJA. High throughput shotgun sequencing of eRNA reveals taxonomic and derived functional shifts across a benthic productivity gradient. Mol Ecol 2020; 30:3023-3039. [PMID: 32706485 DOI: 10.1111/mec.15561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Benthic macrofauna is regularly used in monitoring programmes, however the vast majority of benthic eukaryotic biodiversity lies mostly in microscopic organisms, such as meiofauna (invertebrates < 1 mm) and protists, that rapidly responds to environmental change. These communities have traditionally been hard to sample and handle in the laboratory, but DNA sequencing has made such work less time consuming. While DNA sequencing captures both alive and dead organisms, environmental RNA (eRNA) better targets living organisms or organisms of recent origin in the environment. Here, we assessed the biodiversity of three known bioindicator microeukaryote groups (nematodes, foraminifera, and ciliates) in sediment samples collected at seven coastal sites along an organic carbon (OC) gradient. We aimed to investigate if eRNA shotgun sequencing can be used to simultaneously detect differences in (i) biodiversity of multiple microeukaryotic communities; and (ii) functional feeding traits of nematodes. Results showed that biodiversity was lower for nematodes and foraminifera in high OC (6.2%-6.9%), when compared to low OC sediments (1.2%-2.8%). Dissimilarity in community composition increased for all three groups between Low OC and High OC, as well as the classified feeding type of nematode genera (with more nonselective deposit feeders in high OC sediment). High relative abundant genera included nematode Sabatieria and foraminifera Elphidium in high OC, and Cryptocaryon-like ciliates in low OC sediments. Considering that future sequencing technologies are likely to decrease in cost, the use of eRNA shotgun sequencing to assess biodiversity of benthic microeukaryotes could be a powerful tool in recurring monitoring programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias Broman
- Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.,Baltic Sea Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stefano Bonaglia
- Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.,Nordcee, Department of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Alf Norkko
- Baltic Sea Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.,Tvärminne Zoological Station, University of Helsinki, Hanko, Finland
| | - Simon Creer
- Molecular Ecology and Fisheries Genetics Laboratory, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Francisco J A Nascimento
- Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.,Baltic Sea Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Frühe L, Cordier T, Dully V, Breiner HW, Lentendu G, Pawlowski J, Martins C, Wilding TA, Stoeck T. Supervised machine learning is superior to indicator value inference in monitoring the environmental impacts of salmon aquaculture using eDNA metabarcodes. Mol Ecol 2020; 30:2988-3006. [PMID: 32285497 DOI: 10.1111/mec.15434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Revised: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Increasing anthropogenic impact and global change effects on natural ecosystems has prompted the development of less expensive and more efficient bioassessments methodologies. One promising approach is the integration of DNA metabarcoding in environmental monitoring. A critical step in this process is the inference of ecological quality (EQ) status from identified molecular bioindicator signatures that mirror environmental classification based on standard macroinvertebrate surveys. The most promising approaches to infer EQ from biotic indices (BI) are supervised machine learning (SML) and the calculation of indicator values (IndVal). In this study we compared the performance of both approaches using DNA metabarcodes of bacteria and ciliates as bioindicators obtained from 152 samples collected from seven Norwegian salmon farms. Results from standard macroinvertebrate-monitoring of the same samples were used as reference to compare the accuracy of both approaches. First, SML outperformed the IndVal approach to infer EQ from eDNA metabarcodes. The Random Forest (RF) algorithm appeared to be less sensitive to noisy data (a typical feature of massive environmental sequence data sets) and uneven data coverage across EQ classes (a typical feature of environmental compliance monitoring scheme) compared to a widely used method to infer IndVals for the calculation of a BI. Second, bacteria allowed for a more accurate EQ assessment than ciliate eDNA metabarcodes. For the implementation of DNA metabarcoding into routine monitoring programmes to assess EQ around salmon aquaculture cages, we therefore recommend bacterial DNA metabarcodes in combination with SML to classify EQ categories based on molecular signatures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa Frühe
- Ecology Group, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Tristan Cordier
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Verena Dully
- Ecology Group, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Hans-Werner Breiner
- Ecology Group, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Guillaume Lentendu
- Ecology Group, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Jan Pawlowski
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,ID-Gene Ecodiagnostics Ltd, Geneva, Switzerland.,Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sopot, Poland
| | | | - Thomas A Wilding
- Scottish Marine Institute, Scottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Scotland
| | - Thorsten Stoeck
- Ecology Group, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bock C, Jensen M, Forster D, Marks S, Nuy J, Psenner R, Beisser D, Boenigk J. Factors shaping community patterns of protists and bacteria on a European scale. Environ Microbiol 2020; 22:2243-2260. [PMID: 32202362 DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Factors shaping community patterns of microorganisms are controversially discussed. Physical and chemical factors certainly limit the survival of individual taxa and maintenance of diversity. In recent years, a contribution of geographic distance and dispersal barriers to distribution patterns of protists and bacteria has been demonstrated. Organismic interactions such as competition, predation and mutualism further modify community structure and maintenance of distinct taxa. Here, we address the relative importance of these different factors in shaping protists and bacterial communities on a European scale using high-throughput sequencing data obtained from lentic freshwater ecosystems. We show that community patterns of protists are similar to those of bacteria. Our results indicate that cross-domain organismic factors are important variables with a higher influence on protists as compared with bacteria. Abiotic physical and chemical factors also contributed significantly to community patterns. The contribution of these latter factors was higher for bacteria, which may reflect a stronger biogeochemical coupling. The contribution of geographical distance was similar for both microbial groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Bock
- Biodiversity, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141, Essen, Germany
| | - Manfred Jensen
- Biodiversity, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141, Essen, Germany
| | - Dominik Forster
- Department of Ecology, University of Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schrödinger-Str. 14, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Sabina Marks
- Biodiversity, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141, Essen, Germany
| | - Julia Nuy
- Biodiversity, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141, Essen, Germany
| | - Roland Psenner
- Lake and Glacier Research, Institute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 25, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Daniela Beisser
- Biodiversity, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141, Essen, Germany
| | - Jens Boenigk
- Biodiversity, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Obiol A, Giner CR, Sánchez P, Duarte CM, Acinas SG, Massana R. A metagenomic assessment of microbial eukaryotic diversity in the global ocean. Mol Ecol Resour 2020; 20. [PMID: 32065492 DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Revised: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Surveying microbial diversity and function is accomplished by combining complementary molecular tools. Among them, metagenomics is a PCR free approach that contains all genetic information from microbial assemblages and is today performed at a relatively large scale and reasonable cost, mostly based on very short reads. Here, we investigated the potential of metagenomics to provide taxonomic reports of marine microbial eukaryotes. We prepared a curated database with reference sequences of the V4 region of 18S rDNA clustered at 97% similarity and used this database to extract and classify metagenomic reads. More than half of them were unambiguously affiliated to a unique reference whilst the rest could be assigned to a given taxonomic group. The overall diversity reported by metagenomics was similar to that obtained by amplicon sequencing of the V4 and V9 regions of the 18S rRNA gene, although either one or both of these amplicon surveys performed poorly for groups like Excavata, Amoebozoa, Fungi and Haptophyta. We then studied the diversity of picoeukaryotes and nanoeukaryotes using 91 metagenomes from surface down to bathypelagic layers in different oceans, unveiling a clear taxonomic separation between size fractions and depth layers. Finally, we retrieved long rDNA sequences from assembled metagenomes that improved phylogenetic reconstructions of particular groups. Overall, this study shows metagenomics as an excellent resource for taxonomic exploration of marine microbial eukaryotes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleix Obiol
- Department of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Caterina R Giner
- Department of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pablo Sánchez
- Department of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos M Duarte
- Red Sea Research Center (RSRC), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | - Silvia G Acinas
- Department of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ramon Massana
- Department of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Suarez-Menendez M, Planes S, Garcia-Vazquez E, Ardura A. Early Alert of Biological Risk in a Coastal Lagoon Through eDNA Metabarcoding. Front Ecol Evol 2020. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
18
|
Pitsch G, Bruni EP, Forster D, Qu Z, Sonntag B, Stoeck T, Posch T. Seasonality of Planktonic Freshwater Ciliates: Are Analyses Based on V9 Regions of the 18S rRNA Gene Correlated With Morphospecies Counts? Front Microbiol 2019; 10:248. [PMID: 30837972 PMCID: PMC6389714 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Ciliates represent central nodes in freshwater planktonic food webs, and many species show pronounced seasonality, with short-lived maxima of a few dominant taxa while many being rare or ephemeral. These observations are primarily based on morphospecies counting methods, which, however, have limitations concerning the amount and volume of samples that can be processed. For high sampling frequencies at large scales, high throughput sequencing (HTS) of freshwater ciliates seems to be a promising tool. However, several studies reported large discrepancy between species abundance determinations by molecular compared to morphological means. Therefore, we compared ciliate DNA metabarcodes (V9 regions of the 18S rRNA gene) with morphospecies counts for a 3-year study (Lake Zurich, Switzerland; biweekly sampling, n = 74). In addition, we isolated, cultivated and sequenced the 18S rRNA gene of twelve selected ciliate species that served as seeds for HTS analyses. This workflow allowed for a detailed comparison of V9 data with microscopic analyses by quantitative protargol staining (QPS). The dynamics of V9 read abundances over the seasonal cycle corroborated well with morphospecies population patterns. Annual successions of rare and ephemeral species were more adequately characterized by V9 reads than by QPS. However, numbers of species specific sequence reads only partly reflected rank orders seen by counts. In contrast, biomass-based assemblage compositions showed higher similarity to V9 read numbers, probably indicating a relation between cell sizes and numbers / sizes of macronuclei (or 18S rRNA operons). Full-length 18S rRNA sequences of ciliates assigned to certain morphospecies are urgently needed for barcoding approaches as planktonic taxa are still poorly represented in public databases and the interpretation of HTS data depends on profound reference sequences. Through linking operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with known morphospecies, we can use the deep knowledge about the autecology of these species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianna Pitsch
- Limnological Station, Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Kilchberg, Switzerland
| | - Estelle Patricia Bruni
- Limnological Station, Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Kilchberg, Switzerland
| | - Dominik Forster
- Ecology Group, Technical University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Zhishuai Qu
- Ecology Group, Technical University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Bettina Sonntag
- Research Department for Limnology, Mondsee, University of Innsbruck, Mondsee, Austria
| | - Thorsten Stoeck
- Ecology Group, Technical University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Thomas Posch
- Limnological Station, Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Kilchberg, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|