Limited role of allergy testing in patients with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders

Diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis in children: An update from the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN)

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the esophagus characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and histologically by predominantly eosinophilic infiltration of the squamous epithelium. European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) published a guideline in 2014; however, the rapid evolution of knowledge about pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, and therapeutic options have made an update necessary.

METHODS

A consensus group of pediatric gastroenterologists from the ESPGHAN Working Group on Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases (ESPGHAN EGID WG) reviewed the recent literature and proposed statements and recommendations on 28 relevant questions about EoE. A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from 2014 to 2022. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations.

RESULTS

A total of 52 statements based on the available evidence and 44 consensus-based recommendations are available. A revision of the diagnostic protocol, options for initial drug treatment, and the new concept of simplified empiric elimination diets are now available. Biologics are becoming a part of the potential armamentarium for refractory EoE, and systemic steroids may be considered as the initial treatment for esophageal strictures before esophageal dilation. The importance and assessment of quality of life and a planned transition to adult medical care are new areas addressed in this guideline.

CONCLUSION

Research in recent years has led to a better understanding of childhood EoE. This guideline incorporates the new findings and provides a practical guide for clinicians treating children diagnosed with EoE.

Pathophysiology of Non-Esophageal Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorder (EGID) is an umbrella term encompassing a group of chronic, immune-mediated disorders characterized by eosinophil-rich inflammation affecting one or more segments of the gastrointestinal tract. A recent consensus in nomenclature and emerging data made possible through multi-center consortia are beginning to unravel the molecular and cellular underpinnings of EGIDs below the esophagus. These emerging findings are revealing both overarching commonalities related to a food allergen-driven, chronic, Th2-mediated immune response as well as location-specific nuances in the pathophysiology of the collective EGIDs. Altogether, these advances offer promise for improved diagnoses and more efficacious interventional strategies.

Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases: The Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases are delayed-type chronic allergic disorders that show gastrointestinal eosinophil dense infiltration, with an exaggerated Th2-type immune reaction considered to be an important mechanism. These diseases can be roughly divided into two types: eosinophilic esophagitis, mainly found in young and middle-aged men, and eosinophilic gastroenteritis, which is found in both genders equally. A diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis is suspected when characteristic endoscopic findings, including longitudinal furrows and rings, are noted. However, characteristic endoscopic abnormalities are rarely found in cases with eosinophilic gastroenteritis, so multiple biopsy sampling from the apparently normal gastrointestinal mucosal surface is important for making an accurate diagnosis. The administration of systemic glucocorticoid is the standard treatment for eosinophilic gastroenteritis, while acid inhibitors and topical glucocorticoid swallowing therapy are effective for eosinophilic esophagitis. Anti-cytokine therapies for eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases are currently under development.

Gastrointestinal IgG4 Deposition Is a New Histopathological Feature of Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of eosinophilic esophagitis involves immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) deposition. However, the relationship between IgG4 and eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) is unclear.

AIMS

To investigate gastrointestinal deposition of IgG4 in EGE.

METHODS

Biopsies of the esophagus, stomach, and small intestine were evaluated in patients with and without EGE. Immunohistochemical staining for IgG4 was performed, and the proportions of the stained areas were compared. Sera from patients with EGE were assayed for food-specific IgG4, including egg white, wheat, rice, soy, and cow milk.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were included in this study (EGE group, n = 10; control group, n = 7). Compared with the control group, the proportion of IgG4-stained area in the EGE group was approximately threefold higher (40.2% [32.3-49.5]) vs. 12.1% [4.0-21.9], p = 0.014) in the esophagus, fivefold higher in the stomach (17.3% [11.1-26.2] vs. 3.7% [1.5-5.2], p = 0.014), and sixfold higher in the small intestine (28.0% [15.0-33.2] vs. 4.5% [2.6-9.8], p = 0.019). There was no significant association between the proportion of IgG4-stained area and the number of infiltrating eosinophils. Serum egg white-specific IgG4 levels were correlated with the proportion of IgG4-stained areas in the small intestine (R = 0.7, p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

IgG4 accumulated within the gastrointestinal mucosa in EGE. The positive correlation between serum egg white-specific IgG4 levels and the proportion of IgG4-stained areas in the small intestine suggests a role for IgG4 in the disease pathophysiology.

Two Cases of Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis With Rare Manifestations Revealed in Medical Checkup Findings

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) is characterized by dense infiltration of eosinophils in gastrointestinal tissues, resulting in morphological and functional abnormalities of the gastrointestinal tract. EGE susceptibility is most common among individuals aged 40-50 years old, and hence it is likely that affected patients will be encountered at the time of a medical checkup. In this report, we present two rare cases of EGE that presented interesting manifestations in findings obtained in a fluoroscopic examination performed at an annual medical checkup. Accumulation of case reports is important to provide information to pathologists to enable them to make correct early diagnosis and begin effective treatment at the earliest.

Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding as the First Presentation of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease

Gastrointestinal bleeding is a rare but potentially life-threatening manifestation of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs). Here, we describe a case series comprising 5 pediatric patients between 7 and 12 years of age, who presented to the emergency department with hematemesis and were subsequently diagnosed with EGID. Accompanying allergic history, peripheral eosinophilia, and total IgE elevation were common. Despite a more severe presentation, response to medical and dietary therapy was favorable. A comprehensive review of the literature revealed 26 other cases with similar findings that reinforced the importance of prompt recognition and early dietary and immunomodulating therapy in the control of this disease.

Eosinophilic colitis: an infrequent disease with difficult diagnose

Eosinophilic colitis (EC) is a rare entity. It is part of eosinophilic gastroenteritis, a rare inflammatory disorder characterised by eosinophilic infiltration of tissues that can affect any segment of the digestive tract. The diagnosis is established by the presence of an increased eosinophilic infiltrate in the colon wall in symptomatic patients. There is no characteristic clinical picture of EC. It can be associated with abdominal pain, changes in bowel movements, diarrhoea and rectal bleeding. Biopsies are mandatory if EC is suspected and despite visualising a normal mucosa. Although there are no protocol guidelines in this regard, steroid treatment is the first option in controlling the disease. Increasing the knowledge of clinicians and pathologists of this disorder and the recording its real incidence and population impact, could improve the understanding and treatment of the disease.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases - Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are divided into eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE), depending on the involved gastrointestinal tract, though both are considered to be chronic Th2-type allergic diseases caused by food or environmental allergens. In development of EoE, refluxed gastric acid may also have an important role. For diagnosis of EGIDs, the presence of symptoms possibly originating from the involved gastrointestinal tract and dense eosinophil infiltration are important factors. Imaging studies, including endoscopy and computed tomography, along with histopathological examinations of biopsy specimens are useful for diagnosis, whereas laboratory testing of blood, urine, and stool samples has limited value. Three useful options for treating EoE patients are acid inhibitors, swallowed topical corticosteroids, and an elimination diet, while systemic administration of glucocorticoids is the standard treatment of EGE, though information is limited. Since the prevalence of EGIDs is increasing in Western countries as well as Japan, development of effective treatments based on sufficient evidence is becoming an urgent need.

Clinical and pathological profile of eosinophilic gastroenteritis

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EoGE) can be diagnosed on the basis of histologic criteria; however, the pathology is considered to be heterogeneous. There is no consensus on the management of this enigmatic disorder with an unknown etiology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data for patients diagnosed with EoGE and followed up over a 1-year period were analyzed. Their symptoms, patterns of flares, and type of treatment were documented. The shift in peripheral blood eosinophil levels was also examined.

RESULTS

A total of 10 (mean age, 44 years; range: 31-70 years; women, 5) patients were diagnosed with EoGE. The most frequent presenting symptom was abdominal pain, and eight patients were classified with mucosal type of EoGE. Chronic disease or multiple flares were observed in seven out of 10 (70.0%) patients, and all of them had a history of allergy. Four were corticosteroid dependent (three relapsed during corticosteroid tapering and one following corticosteroid withdrawal). One of them received anti-IL5 monoclonal antibody that enabled corticosteroid dose tapering. In four patients with highly elevated initial eosinophil levels at diagnosis, the peripheral eosinophil level correlated with the amelioration and deterioration of their symptoms. The remaining three patients had a single flare without relapse. Two had no history of allergy.

CONCLUSION

EoGE is a unique disorder with a variable clinical course. Although further studies are required to confirm our observations, the presence of other allergic disorders is associated with chronicity or multiple flares. Peripheral eosinophil level may be an effective biomarker for recurrence in patients with severe systemic disorders at diagnosis.

Clinical analysis of eosinophilic gastroenteritis

AIM

To analyze the clinical features, diagnosis, and prognosis of eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EG).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of clinical data of 88 cases with EG at our hospital between June 2013 and August 2018.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients were included, with a male to female ratio of 1.2:1. The patients ranged in age from 14 to 73 years, with a mean age 45.1 years. Abdominal pain was the most common symptom, 73.3% of patients had positive allergen screening results, and some patients had negative endoscopic findings. Common endoscopic abnormalities were mainly congestion, erosion, ulcers, polyps and so on, and pathological examination revealed a large number of eosinophils infiltrated in the gastrointestinal tract, with the highest average value detected in the cecum. Treatment with proton pump inhibitors was effective. Glucocorticoid therapy was useful, but the disease could recur.

CONCLUSION

The pathogenesis of EG is still unclear, although it is known that allergens play an important role in it. The clinical manifestations are atypical. An increase of eosinophilic granulocytes in peripheral blood and bone marrow smear can support the diagnosis. Imaging and endoscopic manifestations are not specific. Pathology is the key to diagnosis. Glucocorticoid therapy can obtain good results, but there have been no unified criteria on the specific dosage and course of treatment .

Retrospective study recommends endoscopy when diagnosing lymphocytic colitis or eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorder in children with abdominal pain

AIM

This study assessed the prevalence, clinical presentation and outcome of lymphocytic colitis (LC) and eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (EGID) in children with severe, recurrent abdominal pain (RAP), by describing the predominant symptoms, diagnostic approaches and treatment options.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective follow-up study at a Danish regional hospital by reviewing the histology reports of the children who had undergone gastrointestinal endoscopy for RAP. Data were retrieved from the medical records of those who met the diagnostic criteria for LC and, or, EGID from 2011 to 2016. The study population comprised 381 patients who underwent a diagnostic process to clarify RAP.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients (39 females) aged 2-17 years, with severe RAP as the most predominant symptom underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy. This identified 16/74 (21.6%) with LC (n = 6) and, or, EGID (n = 11), which equated to 4.2% with RAP. No biochemical patterns of abnormalities were found. Medical treatment and, or, diet generally induced and maintained clinical remission.

CONCLUSION

We found 16 children with LC and, or, EGID. The predominant symptom was severe RAP. All patients had a macroscopically normal mucosa at endoscopy, a specific histopathological feature and no characteristic biochemical findings. Endoscopy should be considered in these cases.

[Recent progress in the research of Eosinophilic GastroIntestinal Diseases (EGIDs)]

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE), which are included in eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs), are allergic gastrointestinal diseases mainly caused by food allergens, which features dense infiltration of eosinophiles in the gastrointestinal mucosa. A possible mechanism of these diseases are Th2 type allergic reactions, including IL-5, IL-13, and IL-15, thymic stromal protein (TSLP), and eotaxin 3, which are considered to have important roles. The number of patients with EoE is rapidly increasing in both Western and Asian countries. In Japan, a research group of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare has announced recommendations for the diagnosis and management of EoE and EGE in 2015. For a diagnosis of EoE, endoscopic abnormalities and histological confirmation of dense eosinophile infiltration in the esophageal epithelial layer are important, in addition to identifying dysphagia symptoms. As for eosinophilic gastroenteritis, blood test findings are more useful and the role of an endoscopic examination is reduced. Glucocorticoid administration is standard treatment for these diseases, while proton pump inhibitors are frequently effective for EoE. As for EoE, on the one hand, a variety of studies have been performed and new findings collected. On the other hand, information concerning EGE is limited and additional evidence is needed to establish effective treatment options.

Cytokine Profile and Immunoglobulin E-mediated Serological Food Hypersensitivity in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea

Background/Aims

Food interaction, including food hypersensitivity, plays a key role in the pathogenesis of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D). Since only a few studies have been reported about the relationship between food hypersensitivity and IBS-D, we elucidate the prevalence of serological food hypersensitivity in patients with IBS-D and the characteristics of gastrointestinal symptoms and serum cytokine profiles in patients with IBS-D and serological food hypersensitivity.

Methods

Immunoglobulin E (Ig E)-mediated serological food hypersensitivity and serum cytokine levels were evaluated using the multiple allergen simultaneous test evaluating food allergen-specific serum IgE and Luminex Milliplex Panel containing multiple fluorescence-labeled beads. Class 2 or above was considered as IgE-mediated food hypersensitivity positive. The gastrointestinal symptom rating scale was used to evaluate symptoms.

Results

We enrolled 92 subjects, including 60 with IBS-D and 32 healthy controls. The percentages of patients with IgE-mediated serological food hypersensitivity were not significantly different between the groups (controls = 28.1% and IBS-D = 33.3%). Serum IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha, and TNF-α levels were higher in patients with IBS-D than in controls. Serum concentration of TNF-α (43.4 vs 21.8 pg/mL, P = 0.009) was higher in patients with IBS-D without IgE-mediated serological food hypersensitivity than those with food hypersensitivity.

Conclusions

One-third of Japanese patients with IBS-D showed IgE-mediated serological food hypersensitivity. The serum cytokine profile differed and was characterized by lower inflammatory cytokine levels in IBS-D with IgE-mediated serological food hypersensitivity. Serological test regarding IgE-mediated food hypersensitivity can detect a certain cluster of IBS-D.

Successful Food-Elimination Diet in an Adult with Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis

We successfully treated a 22-year-old woman with eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) using a multiple food-elimination diet. The patient was diagnosed with EGE based on histopathological findings and initially treated with oral prednisolone. The symptoms immediately improved, although they recurred when prednisolone was tapered to a low dose. We then treated her with a multiple food-elimination diet, including milk, soy, eggs, wheat, nuts, seafood, and rice. During dietary treatment, we identified dairy products and eggs as causative foods of the symptoms, and we ceased prednisolone. Similar to eosinophilic esophagitis, an elimination diet may be effective for adult patients with EGE.

Eosinophilic esophagitis in Japan: Focus on response to acid suppressive therapy

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by esophageal dysfunction and dense eosinophilic infiltration of esophageal epithelium. According to clinical consensus and guidelines published in 2011, esophageal eosinophilia was classified into two entities based on response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) administration: EoE and PPI-responsive esophageal eosinophilia (PPI-REE). We have performed a series of investigations to determine whether EoE is actually different from PPI-REE. Consistent with Western reports, more than half of our examined patients with symptomatic esophageal eosinophilia suggestive of EoE achieved histological remission with single PPI therapy. Furthermore, our comparisons of clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological findings between patients with EoE and those with PPI-REE revealed nearly no differences between them. We also compared gene expression profiles in mucosal biopsy specimens between those groups and found that microarray findings obtained from PPI-REE patients substantially overlapped with those from EoE patients, suggesting that both represent the same condition or are variations of a single disease. In addition, we have noted that more than half of EoE patients who show resistance to a PPI therapy respond to vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker that has been shown to provide more potent and sustained suppression of gastric acid secretion than PPIs. Our results indicate that PPI-REE may constitute a subtype of EoE. Based on novel evidence including results obtained in our studies, the most recently updated guidelines have included responders to PPI therapy within the spectrum of EoE, abandoning the term PPI-REE.

Eosinophilic Enterocolitis: An Exceedingly Rare Entity

Eosinophilic enterocolitis is an exceptionally rare condition with few described cases in the literature, representing the least frequent manifestation of the wide spectrum of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders. We describe a case of a young male patient presenting with a panmural form of the disease, manifested by abdominal pain, distention, and watery diarrhea with 4 days of evolution, bowel wall thickening, and ascites. Eosinophilic ascites is probably the most unusual presentation form of this entity. It poses a diagnostic challenge because of its nonspecific symptoms, associated with the absence of standardized histological criteria, hence requiring a high level of suspicion. There is also no consensus regarding treatment: it should be individualized according to the patient's age and severity of symptoms.

Serum Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis

Objective Clinically useful serum biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases are not available. This study was conducted to examine the possible value of eosinophil-related proteins as serum biomarkers. Methods The serum concentrations of 49 cytokines, chemokines, and other proteins were measured in 29 patients with eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases and 80 controls. Results The levels of interleukin (IL)-5, IL-33, eotaxin-3, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), previously reported as possible biomarkers of eosinophilic esophagitis, were not significantly elevated in the serum. In contrast, the B cell-attracting chemokine (BCA)-1/chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand (CXCL) 13 and hemofiltrate C-C chemokine (HCC)-1/CC chemokine ligand (CCL) 14α levels were significantly elevated, while the granulocyte chemotactic protein (GCP)-2/CXCL6 levels were suppressed in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis as well as in those with eosinophilic gastroenteritis. The cutaneus T cell-attracting chemokine (CTACK)/CCL27, stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1/CXCL12, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-3β/CCL19, and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) 2 levels were elevated only in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. However, there were large overlaps of data obtained from the patient and control groups, indicating that these serum biomarkers are not adequately sensitive for clinical use with presently available assay systems. Conclusion Of the 49 investigated serum proteins, none were shown to be adequately sensitive for use as biomarkers for the diagnosis or monitoring of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases.

Proposed criteria to differentiate heterogeneous eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders of the esophagus, including eosinophilic esophageal myositis

AIM

To define clinical criteria to differentiate eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorder (EoGD) in the esophagus.

METHODS

Our criteria were defined based on the analyses of the clinical presentation of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), subepithelial eosinophilic esophagitis (sEoE) and eosinophilic esophageal myositis (EoEM), identified by endoscopy, manometry and serum immunoglobulin E levels (s-IgE), in combination with histological and polymerase chain reaction analyses on esophageal tissue samples.

RESULTS

In five patients with EoE, endoscopy revealed longitudinal furrows and white plaques in all, and fixed rings in two. In one patient with sEoE and four with EoEM, endoscopy showed luminal compression only. Using manometry, failed peristalsis was observed in patients with EoE and sEoE with some variation, while EoEM was associated with hypercontractile or hypertensive peristalsis, with elevated s-IgE. Histology revealed the following eosinophils per high-power field values. EoE = 41.4 ± 7.9 in the epithelium and 2.3 ± 1.5 in the subepithelium; sEoE = 3 in the epithelium and 35 in the subepithelium (conventional biopsy); EoEM = none in the epithelium, 10.7 ± 11.7 in the subepithelium (conventional biopsy or endoscopic mucosal resection) and 46.8 ± 16.5 in the muscularis propria (peroral esophageal muscle biopsy). Presence of dilated epithelial intercellular space and downward papillae elongation were specific to EoE. Eotaxin-3, IL-5 and IL-13 were overexpressed in EoE.

CONCLUSION

Based on clinical and histological data, we identified criteria, which differentiated between EoE, sEoE and EoEM, and reflected a different pathogenesis between these esophageal EoGDs.

Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis and Colitis: a Comprehensive Review

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, including eosinophilic esophagitis, gastroenteritis, and colitis, refer to a spectrum of clinical diseases that present with variable degrees of infiltration of the gastrointestinal tract by eosinophils in the absence of other known causes of tissue eosinophilia. Clinical symptoms and laboratory findings are usually non-specific and may or may not be accompanied by peripheral blood eosinophilia. The extent of eosinophilic infiltration of the gastrointestinal wall varies from mucosal to transmural and serosal involvement. Diagnosis requires presence of gastrointestinal symptoms, demonstration of gastrointestinal eosinophilia by biopsy, and exclusion of other known causes of tissue eosinophilia. Many studies have pointed toward the eosinophil as the major offender; however, the exact functional role of the eosinophil in the pathogenesis of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders remains unclear. The roles of T-helper-2 cytokines and other mediators, such as eotaxin-1 and interleukin-5, have gained significant importance in the pathobiology of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders. Current understanding of treatment is based on case reports and a few case series, as there is a lack of large prospective studies. Steroids are currently the mainstay of therapy, but the roles of other drugs such as leukotriene inhibitors, mast cell stabilizers, interleukin-5 inhibitors, and anti-immunoglobulin E, along with other targets in the immune pathway, are currently being explored.

Eosinophilic disorders of the gastro-intestinal tract: an update

Eosinophilic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE), are rare chronic pathologies of the digestive system, with an immuno-mediated pathogenesis. Recent data suggest that, together with the “classic” IgE-response to allergens, also a delayed hypersensitivity mechanism could be involved in the development of eosinophilic disorders. EoE and EGE were studied only in the latest decades and as a consequence accurate data are not yet available, concerning not only pathogenesis, but also epidemiology, treatment and outcomes. The diagnosis of EoE is centered on endoscopic findings but the certainty is obtained by histological examination from biopsy samples, that has a sensitivity of 100% when based on five samples. The currently available treatments include topical corticosteroids, specific diets and endoscopic treatment. Concerning EGE, three subtypes (mucosal, muscular, and serosal) were identified. The diagnosis is based, as for EoE, on endoscopic and histological assessment, and the treatment includes pharmacological and dietetic approaches. Further studies are warranted in order to better define the etiology and pathogenesis of eosinophilic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, and thus to develop more appropriate and specific therapies.

[Eosinophilic gastroenteritis and colitis in pediatric patients: Increasingly frequent diseases]

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by no specific digestive symptoms associated with dense eosinophilic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract in the absence of known causes for such tissue eosinophilia. Among these diseases, eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) and colitis (EC) are less common than esophagitis, but their incidence and prevalence have been increasing over the past decade due in part to increased disease recognition. The exact pathophysiology is not clear: EGE and EC are immune-mediated diseases implicating adaptive T-helper cell type 2 immunity. According to the site of eosinophilic infiltration, there is a wide spectrum of digestive symptoms ranging from food refusal, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, weight loss, gastrointestinal bleeding (anemia), protein loosing enteropathy, ascites, bowel obstruction or perforation for EGE and diarrhea ± bleeding for CE. Endoscopic lesions are not specific: friability, erythematous mucosa with superficial erosions, or ulceration is often observed. Histologically, markedly increased numbers of mucosal eosinophils are seen in biopsy specimens. However, no standards for the diagnosis of EGE or CE exist and few findings support the diagnosis: intraepithelial eosinophils, eosinophil crypt abscesses, and eosinophils in muscularis mucosa and/or submucosa. Other organs are not involved. The other causes of tissue eosinophilia (infections, inflammatory bowel diseases) should be excluded. Food allergy appears to play a central role in driving inflammation in EGE and CE, as evidenced by symptomatic improvement with initiation of food exclusion or elemental diets. Dietary treatment should be the first therapeutic option in children. If the elimination diet fails, corticosteroids are currently the best characterized treatment but appropriate duration is unknown and relapses are frequent. In severe forms, immunomodulators or biologic agents (anti-IL5, anti-IgE, or anti-TNFa) can potentially play a role in the treatment of EGE and CE.

Effectiveness of dietary allergen exclusion therapy on eosinophilic colitis in Chinese infants and young children ≤ 3 years of age

Eosinophilic colitis is a well recognized clinical entity mainly associated with food allergies. Empiric treatment options include dietary allergen exclusion (extensively hydrolyzed protein formula and elimination diet), anti-allergy medications (antihistamines and leukotriene receptor antagonists) and corticosteroids. We evaluated the effectiveness of dietary antigen exclusion on clinical remission of eosinophilic colitis in infants and young children. We retrospectively reviewed charts of all infants and children ≤3 years of age who were diagnosed with eosinophilic colitis (defined as mucosal eosinophilia ≥20 hpf⁻¹) from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2013 at a tertiary children’s hospital in China. Forty-nine children were identified with eosinophilic colitis. Elemental formula, simple elimination diet or combination therapy resulted in clinical improvement in 75%, 88.2% and 80% of patients, respectively. In conclusion, eosinophilic colitis in infants and children ≤3 years of age responded well to dietary allergen exclusion.

Clinical features of eosinophilic esophagitis: differences between Asian and Western populations

The prevalence and incidence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have been rapidly increasing in Western countries. It is thought to be more common among Caucasians than other racial or ethnic groups, but epidemiological studies have not been fully evaluated in Asian populations, and its clinical manifestation is rarely documented. In this review, recent reports regarding EoE in Asian countries have been collected, and differences in the clinical features, including symptoms and endoscopic findings, between Asian and Western populations have been evaluated. In Asia, EoE is still much less prevalent than in Western countries. Baseline values for average age, male/female ratio, and personal history of allergic disease were comparable to those in Western populations. Predominant symptoms were dysphagia, and food impaction was extremely rare among Asian patients. Although the frequency of abnormal endoscopic findings varies among studies, over 90% of patients with EoE have shown abnormal findings such as linear furrow, which is the most common findings, in recent prospective studies in Asia. There are few reports regarding the treatment of EoE and no prospective studies evaluating drugs or elimination diet in patient with EoE have been reported in Asia. Overall, EoE had similar clinical characteristics in Asian populations. Because the incidence of EoE could increase in the future with the increase in allergic disorders in Asian countries, large-scale, nationwide prospective studies should be performed to more fully understand the epidemiology and pathophysiology of EoE in Asian populations.

A Case of Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis with Ascites

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis is a rare disorder of unknown cause characterized by focal or diffuse eosinophilic infiltration of gastrointestinal tract, especially the stomach and duodenum. Its clinical presentation depends on which segment of gastrointestinal tract is affected and on the depth of eosinophilic infiltration in the affected segment. We present a case of a 35-year-old male with abdominal distention for six months. Laboratory testing revealed elevated eosinophil count and serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels. In abdominal tomography, ascites was observed, and eosinophilic infiltration was detected in duodenum biopsy samples, collected during endoscopic examination of upper gastrointestinal system. Clinical and pathologic findings of the patient responded to steroid dramatically. Even though their comorbidity is rare, eosinophilic gastroenteritis should be considered in differential diagnosis of patients with unspecified ascites.

The management of eosinophilic gastroenteritis

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EG) is a rare disorder characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of the gastrointestinal tract. No medication at present is approved by the Food and drug administration of United States for the treatment of EG. The rarity of the disease limits our experience with the different management options. It also limits the ability to conduct randomized controlled trials that could clearly delineate the efficacy of new therapeutic agents. This review assesses the various management options that have been tried on patients with EG.

Serum immunoglobulin free light chain levels are higher in girls than boys during eosinophilic oesophagitis

AIM

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EO) is an emerging worldwide disease, closely associated with male gender and allergic disorders. This study investigated the distribution of allergy markers in a cohort of children with EO.

METHODS

We analysed allergy markers in 91 children (62 males and 29 females) with EO and a control group of 45 age-matched children who had non-EO gastrointestinal allergic symptoms. The markers analysed were serum cow's milk-specific and hen's egg-specific IgE, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), thymus-regulated and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC/CCL17) and immunoglobulin free light chain (Ig-fLC).

RESULTS

In the EO group, cow's milk-specific IgE levels were detectable in 41.9% of males and 62.1% of females and hen's egg-specific levels in 25% of males and 26.9% of females. There was no gender difference in increased TSLP or TARC levels. Kappa Ig-fLC were increased in 5.6% of males and 20.8% of females (p = 0.058) and lambda Ig-fLC in 1.9% of males and 33.3% of females (p = 0.000). No gender differences were found in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that serum TSLP might be a potential marker of EO and TARC of non-EO gastrointestinal food allergies. In EO, serum Ig-fLC appeared higher in females, adding another gender difference to the biology of EO.

Efficacy of dietary interventions for inducing histologic remission in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Various dietary interventions have been used to treat patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), yielding varied results. This systematic review assesses the efficacy of different dietary therapies in inducing disease remission.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases for studies investigating the efficacy of dietary interventions (reducing infiltration by immune cells <15 eosinophils/high-power field in esophageal biopsies) for pediatric and adult patients with EoE. Summary estimates, including 95% confidence intervals (CI), were calculated for exclusive feeding with amino acid-based elemental formulas, allergy test result-directed food elimination diets, and 6-food elimination diets (SFED). A fixed- or random-effects model was used depending on heterogeneity (I(2)); publication bias risks were assessed by means of funnel plot analysis.

RESULTS

The search yielded 581 references; of these, 33 were included in the quantitative summary. We analyzed data on a total of 1317 patients with EoE (1128 children and 189 adults) who received different dietary treatments. Elemental diets were effective for 90.8% of cases (95% CI, 84.7%-95.5%; I(2) = 52.3%), SFED for 72.1% (95% CI, 65.8%-78.1%; I(2) = 0), and allergy test result-directed food elimination for 45.5% of cases (95% CI, 35.4%-55.7%; I(2) = 75.1%). Additional strategies (elimination of cow's milk, gluten-free diets, and 4-food elimination diet) were also evaluated. Adults vs children had no significant differences in remission after dietary interventions (67.2% vs 63.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Dietary interventions are effective in producing histologic remission in patients with EoE. Elemental diets and SFEDs were the most effective, achieving <15 eosinophils/high-power field in 90.8% and 72.1% of patients, respectively.