Dexamethasone on postoperative gastrointestinal motility: A placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial

Effect of dexamethasone pretreatment using deep learning on the surgical effect of patients with gastrointestinal tumors

To explore the application efficacy and significance of deep learning in anesthesia management for gastrointestinal tumors (GITs) surgery, 80 elderly patients with GITs who underwent surgical intervention at our institution between January and September 2021 were enrolled. According to the preoperative anesthesia management methodology, patients were rolled into a control (Ctrl) group (using 10 mg dexamethasone 1-2 hours before surgery) and an experimental (Exp) group (using a deep learning-based anesthesia monitoring system on the basis of the Ctrl group), with 40 cases in each group. A comprehensive comparative analysis was performed between the two cohorts, encompassing postoperative cognitive evaluations, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, gastrointestinal functionality, serum biomarkers (including interleukin (IL)-6, C-reactive protein (CRP), and cortisol levels), length of hospitalization, incidence of complications, and other pertinent metrics. The findings demonstrated that anesthesia monitoring facilitated by deep learning algorithms effectively assessed the anesthesia state of patients. Compared to the Ctrl group, patients in the Exp group showed significant differences in cognitive assessments (word recall, number connection, number coding) (P<0.05). Additionally, the Exp group exhibited a notably increased MoCA score (25.3±2.4), significantly shorter time to first flatus postoperatively (35.8±13.7 hours), markedly reduced postoperative pain scores, significantly shortened time to tolerate a liquid diet postoperatively (19.6±5.2 hours), accelerated recovery of serum-related indicators, and a significantly decreased mean length of hospital stay (11.4±3.2 days) compared to the Ctrl group. In summary, administering dexamethasone under the anesthesia management of GITs surgery based on gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) and pharmacokinetics pharmacodynamics (PKPD) models can promote patient recovery, reduce the incidence of postoperative cognitive impairment (POCD), and improve patient prognosis.

Factors affecting gastrointestinal function recovery after cesarean section among Chinese mothers: A cross-sectional study

This study was conducted to explore the influencing factors of gastrointestinal function recovery after cesarean section (CS), which could provide a reference for the enhanced recovery after surgery in obstetrics. This is a cross-sectional survey on Chinese mothers receiving CS. The participants's socio-demographic characteristics, perioperative diet, medical condition and gastrointestinal function after surgery were collected by a self-designed questionnaire. Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to explore the influencing factors of gastrointestinal function recovery after CS. A total of 1501 (94.76%) valid questionnaires were collected. The first borborygmus was 2.21 ± 0.63 hours, and the first anal exhaust was 35.73 ± 14.85 hours after the CS. The incidence of abdominal distension and intestinal obstruction were 15.1% and 0.7%, respectively. The parity, type of CS, 2-hours bleeding after surgery, time of first meal after surgery, whether taking peppermint water after surgery were the independent influencing factors for gastrointestinal function recovery after CS. We should pay more attention to the mothers with scarred uterus, manage the labor process strictly, and reduce 2-hours bleeding after surgery. The mothers with CS should also be encouraged to eat early and take peppermint water to promote intestinal peristalsis actively.

Perioperative intravenous dexamethasone for patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Dexamethasone is a glucocorticoid that is often administered intraoperatively as prophylaxis for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined its use in colorectal surgery. This systematic review aims to assess the postoperative impacts of dexamethasone use in colorectal surgery.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched from database inception to January 2023. Articles were included if they compared perioperative intravenous dexamethasone to a control group in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in terms of postoperative morbidity. The primary outcomes were prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) and PONV. Secondary outcomes included postoperative infectious morbidity and return of bowel function. A pair-wise meta-analysis and GRADE assessment of the quality of evidence were performed.

RESULTS

After reviewing 3476 relevant citations, seven articles (five RCTs, two retrospective cohorts) met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 1568 patients received perioperative dexamethasone and 1459 patients received a control. Patients receiving perioperative dexamethasone experienced significantly less PPOI based on moderate-quality evidence (three studies, OR 0.46, 95%CI 0.28-0.74, p < 0.01). Time to first flatus was significantly reduced with intravenous dexamethasone. There was no difference between groups in terms of PONV (four studies, OR 0.90, 95%CI 0.64-1.27, p = 0.55), postoperative morbidity (OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.63-1.39, p = 0.74), or rate of postoperative infectious complications (seven studies, OR 0.74, 95%CI 0.55-1.01, p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

This review presents moderate-quality evidence that perioperative intravenous dexamethasone may reduce PPOI and enhance the return of bowel function following elective colorectal surgery. There was no significant observed effect on PONV or postoperative infectious complications.

Intravenous dexamethasone administration during anesthesia induction can improve postoperative nutritional tolerance of patients following elective gastrointestinal surgery: A post-hoc analysis

Aim

To investigate the effect of intravenous dexamethasone administration on postoperative enteral nutrition tolerance in patients following gastrointestinal surgery.

Methods

Based on the previous results of a randomized controlled study to explore whether intravenous administration of dexamethasone recovered gastrointestinal function after gastrointestinal surgery, we used the existing research data from 1 to 5 days post operation in patients with enteral nutrition tolerance and nutrition-related analyses of the changes in serum indices, and further analyzed the factors affecting resistance to enteral nutrition.

Result

The average daily enteral caloric intake was significantly higher in patients receiving intravenous administration of dexamethasone during anesthesia induction than in controls (8.80 ± 0.92 kcal/kg/d vs. 8.23 ± 1.13 kcal/kg/d, P = 0.002). Additionally, intravenous administration of 8 mg dexamethasone during anesthesia induction can reduce the changes in postoperative day (POD) 3, POD5, and preoperative values of serological indices, including ΔPA, ΔALB, and ΔRBP (P < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, dexamethasone significantly increased the average daily enteral nutrition caloric intake in patients undergoing enterotomy (8.98 ± 0.87 vs. 8.37 ± 1.17 kcal/kg/d, P = 0.010) or in female patients (8.94 ± 0.98 vs. 8.10 ± 1.24 kcal/kg/d, P = 0.019). The changes of serological indexes (ΔPA, ΔALB, and ΔRBP) in the dexamethasone group were also significantly different on POD3 and POD5 (P < 0.05). In addition, multivariate analysis showed that dexamethasone use, surgical site, and age might influence enteral nutrition caloric tolerance.

Conclusion

Postoperative enteral nutrition tolerance was significantly improved in patients receiving intravenous administration of dexamethasone during anesthesia induction, especially in patients following enterotomy surgery, with significant improvements in average daily enteral caloric intake, PA levels, ALB levels, and RBP levels.

Clinical trial registration

http://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR1900024000.

Patient-reported gastrointestinal symptoms following surgery for gastric cancer and the relative risk factors

Purpose

The study aims to assess the incidence of short-term patient-reported postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms (PGISs) after gastric cancer surgery and explore the relative risk factors for the symptoms.

Methods

Patients with radical gastrectomy were included for this retrospective and observational study. Symptoms extracted from the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Gastrointestinal Cancer Module (MDASI-GI) were collected in postdischarge week (PDW) 1 and postoperative month (POM) 1. The distributing states of symptoms were analyzed in PDW1 and POM1. Logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for PGISs.

Results

Among 356 patients with complete interviews, 156 (43.8%) patients reported abdominal distention in PDW1, which was significantly higher than patients in POM1 [103 (28.9%), p &lt; 0.001]. Pain (15.2% vs. 9.8%), dysphagia (5.6% vs. 7.0%), diarrhea (3.7% vs. 3.4%), and vomiting (2.5% vs. 2.8%) had no significant differences between PDW1 and POM1. Logistic models found that risk factors for PGISs were total gastrectomy [odds ratio (OR): 1.948; 95% CI: 1.097–3.459; p = 0.023] and disturbed sleep (OR: 3.116; 95% CI: 1.831–5.303; p &lt; 0.001) in PDW1 and female gender (OR: 1.726; 95% CI: 1.071–2.782; p = 0.025), total gastrectomy (OR: 1.729; 95% CI: 1.055–2.834; p = 0.030), and disturbed sleep (OR: 3.533; 95% CI: 1.757–7.106; p &lt; 0.001) in POM1.

Conclusions

The main symptom after gastric cancer surgery was abdominal distention. The relative risk factors for gastrointestinal symptoms after gastric cancer surgery were total gastrectomy and disturbed sleep. Timely symptom intervention may improve the quality of life of postgastrectomy patients.

Bacillus coagulans TBC169 probiotics for the recovery of intestinal function after gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that Bacillus coagulans TBC169 can improve intestinal motility.

AIM

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of Bacillus coagulans TBC169 probiotics in promoting the recovery of intestinal function after gynecological laparoscopic surgery.

METHOD

Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgeries due to gynecological diseases were randomly assigned to the high-dose, conventional-dose, and the placebo-control groups (1:1:1 ratio). The primary outcome was the time to the first passage of flatus time (FFT). Secondary outcomes were the time to the first defecation (FDT), the time to the first bowel sounds (TFBS), the duration of hospital stay (DHS), and the incidence of postoperative adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Compared to the placebo-control group, shorter FFT values were observed in the conventional-dose (23.15 h vs. 29.10 h, P < 0.05) and high-dose (19.15 h vs. 29.10 h, P < 0.001) groups. Similar trends were observed regarding TFBS in the conventional-dose (18.50 h vs. 21.10 h, P < 0.05) and high-dose (15.20 h vs. 21.10 h, P < 0.001) groups. There were no significant differences in FFT and TFBS between the intervention groups. Compared to the placebo-control group, lower incidences of postoperative adverse events were observed in the conventional-dose (12.50% vs. 40.00%, P < 0.05) and the high-dose (5.00% vs. 40.00%, P < 0.001) groups. However, there were no significant differences between these intervention groups.

CONCLUSION

Bacillus coagulans TBC169 probiotics can accelerate intestinal function recovery, and reduce postoperative adverse events in patients after gynecological laparoscopic surgery. The study protocol was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200059518).

Dexamethasone: Insights into Pharmacological Aspects, Therapeutic Mechanisms, and Delivery Systems

Dexamethasone (DEX) has been widely used to treat a variety of diseases, including autoimmune diseases, allergies, ocular disorders, cancer, and, more recently, COVID-19. However, DEX usage is often restricted in the clinic due to its poor water solubility. When administered through a systemic route, it can elicit severe side effects, such as hypertension, peptic ulcers, hyperglycemia, and hydro-electrolytic disorders. There is currently much interest in developing efficient DEX-loaded nanoformulations that ameliorate adverse disease effects inhibiting advancements in scientific research. Various nanoparticles have been developed to selectively deliver drugs without destroying healthy cells or organs in recent years. In the present review, we have summarized some of the most attractive applications of DEX-loaded delivery systems, including liposomes, polymers, hydrogels, nanofibers, silica, calcium phosphate, and hydroxyapatite. This review provides our readers with a broad spectrum of nanomedicine approaches to deliver DEX safely.

What is the impact of dexamethasone on postoperative pain in adults undergoing general anaesthesia for elective abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous meta-analysis of heterogeneous surgical cohorts demonstrated reduction in postoperative pain with perioperative intravenous dexamethasone, but none have addressed adults undergoing elective abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of intravenous perioperative dexamethasone on postoperative pain in adults undergoing elective abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia.

METHODS

This review was prospectively registered on the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42020176202). Electronic databases Medical Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Exerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), (CINAHL) Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science and trial registries were searched to January 28 2021 for randomised controlled trials, comparing dexamethasone to placebo or alternative antiemetic, that reported pain. The primary outcome was pain score, and secondary outcomes were time to first analgesia, opioid requirements and time to post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge.

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies (5768 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Pain scores ≤ 4 hour (h) were reduced in patients who received dexamethasone at rest (mean difference (MD), - 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.72 to - 0.35, I2 = 81%) and on movement (MD - 0.42, 95% CI - 0.62 to - 0.22, I2 = 35). In the dexamethasone group, 4-24 h pain scores were less at rest (MD - 0.31, 95% CI - 0.47 to - 0.14, I2 = 96) and on movement (MD - 0.26, 95% CI - 0.39 to - 0.13, I2 = 29) and pain scores ≥ 24 h were reduced at rest (MD - 0.38, 95% CI - 0.52 to - 0.24, I2 = 88) and on movement (MD - 0.38, 95% CI - 0.65 to - 0.11, I2 = 71). Time to first analgesia (minutes) was increased (MD 22.92, 95% CI 11.09 to 34.75, I2 = 98), opioid requirements (mg oral morphine) decreased (MD - 6.66, 95% CI - 9.38 to - 3.93, I2 = 88) and no difference in time to PACU discharge (MD - 3.82, 95% CI - 10.87 to 3.23, I2 = 59%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving dexamethasone had reduced pain scores, postoperative opioid requirements and longer time to first analgesia. Dexamethasone is an effective analgesic adjunct for patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

A randomized controlled trial of the effect of ramosetron on postoperative restoration of bowel motility after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of ramosetron after gynecological laparoscopic surgery on the recovery of bowel function.

METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled trial conducted at Kyung Hee University hospital, South Korea, from August 2016 to September 2017. Patients were randomized to receive either 10 mg dexamethasone before induction of anesthesia (control group C), followed by intravenous administration of patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) or 2 ml normal saline before induction of anesthesia and 0.6 mg ramosetron (study group R) administered with IV-PCA.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients were enrolled. Times to first flatus (group C 23.98 ± 6.31 vs. group R 27.14 ± 9.56 h; P = 0.148) and first defecation (group C 36.16 ± 16.04 vs. group R 43.41 ± 20.01 h; P = 0.138) showed no statistically significant differences. No significant differences were observed in the frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and demand for additional analgesics. Multiple linear regression for analysis of factors affecting time to first flatus revealed no significant results.

CONCLUSION

Ramosetron did not delay bowel movement recovery after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery and was as effective as dexamethasone in regulating PONV. Ramosetron can be used with IV-PCA without concerns about delay in recovery of bowel function. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT02849483.

Perioperative transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for improving postoperative gastrointestinal function: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (PGD) is one of the most common complications in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Acupuncture has been used widely in gastrointestinal diseases due to its effectiveness and minimally invasive nature.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the efficacy of using transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) during the surgery and postoperative recovery in patients with gastric and colorectal surgery for improving postoperative gastrointestinal function.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS

A total of 280 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were stratified by type of surgery (i.e., gastric or colorectal surgery) and randomly allocated into the TEAS group (group T) or the sham group (group S). Patients in group T received TEAS at LI4, PC6, ST36 and ST37. Patients in group S received pseudo-TEAS at sham acupoints. The stimulation was given from 30 min before anesthesia until the end of surgery. The same treatment was performed at 9 am on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd days after surgery, until the recovery of flatus in patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the time to the first bowel motion, as detected by auscultation. The secondary outcomes included the first flatus and ambulation time, changes of perioperative substance P (SP), incidence of PGD, postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and some economic indicators.

RESULTS

The time to first bowel motion, first flatus and first ambulation in group T was much shorter than that in group S (P < 0.01). In patients undergoing colorectal surgery, the concentration of SP was lower in group T than in group S on the third day after the operation (P < 0.05). The average incidence of PGD in all patients was 25%, and the frequency of PGD was significantly lower in group T than in group S (18.6% vs. 31.4%, respectively; P < 0.05). TEAS treatment (odds ratio = 0.498; 95% confidence interval: 0.232-0.786) and type of surgery were relevant factors for the development of PGD. Postoperative pain score and PONV occurrence were significantly lower in group T (P < 0.01). Postoperative hospitalization days and the resulting cost to patients were greatly reduced in the TEAS group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative TEAS was able to promote the recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function, reduce the incidence of PGD and PONV. The concentration of SP was decreased by TEAS treatment, which indicates that the brain-gut axis may play a role in how TEAS regulates gastrointestinal function.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900023263.