Pandemic influenza plans in residential care facilities

Cross-sectional Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Levels and Decay Rates Following Infection of Unvaccinated Elderly Individuals

Background

SARS-CoV-2 infections have disproportionally burdened elderly populations with excessive mortality. While several contributing factors exists, questions remain about the quality and duration of humoral antibody-mediated responses resulting from infections in unvaccinated elderly individuals.

Methods

Residual serum/plasma samples were collected from individuals undergoing routine SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction testing in a community laboratory in Canada. The samples were collected in 2020, before vaccines became available. IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid, trimeric spike, and its receptor-binding domain were quantified via a high-throughput chemiluminescent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Neutralization efficiency was also quantified through a surrogate high-throughput protein-based neutralization assay.

Results

This study analyzed SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in a large cross-sectional cohort (N = 739), enriched for elderly individuals (median age, 82 years; 75% >65 years old), where 72% of samples tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction. The age group ≥90 years had higher levels of antibodies than that <65 years. Neutralization efficiency showed an age-dependent trend, where older persons had higher levels of neutralizing antibodies. Antibodies targeting the nucleocapsid had the fastest decline. IgG antibodies targeting the receptor-binding domain remained stable over time, potentially explaining the lack of neutralization decay observed in this cohort.

Conclusions

Despite older individuals having the highest levels of antibodies postinfection, they are the cohort in which antibody decay was the fastest. Until a better understanding of correlates of protection is acquired, along with the protective role of nonneutralizing antibodies, booster vaccinations remain important in this demographic.

Model Testing of the Factors That Influence Performance of Function Focused Care and Function Among Assisted Living Residents

The purpose of this study was to test a model of factors associated with participating in function focused care. Function focused care is a philosophy of care in which residents are encouraged to engage in functional and physical activities during care interactions. This was a secondary data analysis using data from the Dissemination and Implementation of Function Focused Care for Assisted Living Using the Evidence Integration Triangle (FFC-AL-EIT) study. Residents (n = 550) were recruited from 59 AL settings. The majority were female (n = 380, 69%) and White (n = 536, 97%). Model testing was done. Comorbidities, quality of interactions, environments, profit status, cognitive impairment, depression, and function were associated with function focused care and accounted for 17% of the variance. Next steps should include intervening on changeable factors (e.g., environments) and adding factors to better explain performance of function focused care such as motivation, resilience, and staff satisfaction.

Using Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions and High Isolation of Asymptomatic Carriers to Contain the Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Nursing Homes

More than 40% of the deaths recorded in the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic were linked to nursing homes. Not only are the residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) typically older and more susceptible to endemic infections, the facilities’ high degree of connection to wider communities makes them especially vulnerable to local COVID-19 outbreaks. In 2008, in the wake of the SARS-CoV-1 and MERS epidemics and anticipating an influenza pandemic, we created a stochastic compartmental model to evaluate the deployment of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) in LTCFs during influenza epidemics. In that model, the most effective NPI by far was a staff schedule consisting of 5-day duty periods with onsite residence, followed by an 4-to-5 day off-duty period with a 3-day quarantine period just prior to the return to work. Unlike influenza, COVID-19 appears to have significant rates of pre-symptomatic transmission. In this study, we modified our prior modeling framework to include new parameters and a set of NPIs to identify and control the degree of pre-symptomatic transmission. We found that infections, deaths, hospitalizations, and ICU utilization were projected to be high and largely irreducible, even with rigorous application of all defined NPIs, unless pre-symptomatic carriers can be identified and isolated at high rates. We found that increasingly rigorous application of NPIs is likely to significantly decrease the peak of infections; but even with complete isolation of symptomatic persons, and a 50% reduction in silent transmission, the attack rate is projected to be nearly 95%.

[COVID-19 deaths among residents of inpatient nursing homes in Munich-causes and places of death]

INTRODUCTION

The new infectious disease COVID-19 first appeared in China in December 2019. So far, a systematic evaluation of death certificates of COVID-19-associated deaths of residents in inpatient nursing homes has not been presented.

METHODS

Death certificates of all deaths in Munich in the death period from 1 March to 31 July 2020 were analyzed. Inclusion criteria were the presence of "Corona, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2" on the death certificates. Standardized, anonymized data entry was performed. The collected data were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 5840 persons died, 281 (4.8%) of whom died of confirmed COVID-19 disease. Of those, 72 deaths involved residents of Munich nursing facilities. The most frequent causes of death were respiratory insufficiency (54 cases) and multiple organ failure (9 cases). On the death certificates, an average of two preexisting diseases had been reported; the average age at death was 88 years. All deaths of nursing home residents occurred in association with nosocomial COVID-19 outbreaks, which affected one-third of the facilities. The vast majority of these homes did not have a COVID-19 hygiene plan in place at the time.

DISCUSSION

One quarter of all COVID-19 deaths in Munich occurred in the context of nosocomial outbreaks in elderly, chronically ill residents of nursing facilities. Evidence of inadequate risk assessment and inadequate hygiene management emerged. In the opinion of the authors, the appropriate structures for adequate hygiene management must be created and a hygiene regulation must be issued in which the tasks and responsibilities of the facility operators are defined.

The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Long-Term Care Facilities Worldwide: An Overview on International Issues

The COVID-19 pandemic had a great negative impact on nursing homes, with massive outbreaks being reported in care facilities all over the world, affecting not only the residents but also the care workers and visitors. Due to their advanced age and numerous underlying diseases, the inhabitants of long-term care facilities represent a vulnerable population that should benefit from additional protective measures against contamination. Recently, multiple countries such as France, Spain, Belgium, Canada, and the United States of America reported that an important fraction from the total number of deaths due to the SARS-CoV-2 infection emerged from nursing homes. The scope of this paper was to present the latest data regarding the COVID-19 spread in care homes worldwide, identifying causes and possible solutions that would limit the outbreaks in this overlooked category of population. It is the authors' hope that raising awareness on this matter would encourage more studies to be conducted, considering the fact that there is little information available on the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on nursing homes. Establishing national databases that would register all nursing home residents and their health status would be of great help in the future not only for managing the ongoing pandemic but also for assessing the level of care that is needed in this particularly fragile setting.

COVID-19 Pandemic in Assisted Living Communities: Results from Seven States

OBJECTIVE

To describe variations in COVID‐19 confirmed cases and deaths among assisted living (AL) residents and examine their associations with key AL characteristics.

DESIGN

Observational study employing data on confirmed COVID‐19 cases and deaths in ALs from seven states, through May 29, 2020.

SETTING

Information on COVID‐19 cases/deaths in ALs was obtained from state government websites. A national inventory of ALs was used to identify communities with and without COVID‐19 cases/deaths. Medicare Beneficiary Summary File identifying AL residents was employed to develop AL characteristics. County‐level COVID‐19 laboratory‐confirmed cases/deaths were obtained from publicly available data.

PARTICIPANTS

We found 4,865 ALs (2,647 COVID‐19 cases and 777 deaths) in the seven states. After excluding missing data, the sample consisted of 3,994 ALs (82.1%) with 2,542 cases (96.0%) and 675 deaths (86.9%).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Outcomes were AL‐level counts of cases and deaths. Covariates were AL characteristics and county‐level confirmed COVID‐19 cases/deaths. Multivariable two‐part models determined the associations of independent variables with the likelihood of at least one case and death in the AL, and with the count of cases (deaths).

RESULTS

State case fatality ranged from 3.32% in North Carolina to 9.26% in Connecticut, but for ALs in these states it was 12.89% and 31.59%, respectively. Among ALs with at least one case, midsize communities had fewer cases (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.829; P = .004) than small ALs. ALs with higher proportions of racial/ethnic minorities had more COVID‐19 cases (IRR = 1.08; P < .001), as did communities with higher proportions of residents with dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and obesity.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

ALs with a higher proportion of minorities had more COVID‐19 cases. Many of the previously identified individual risk factors are also present in this vulnerable population. The impact of COVID‐19 on ALs is as critical as that on nursing homes, and is worth equal attention from policy makers.

COVID-19 highlights the need for universal adoption of standards of medical care for physicians in nursing homes in Europe

The nursing home sector has seen a disproportionately high number of deaths as part of the COVID-19 pandemic. This reflects, in part, the frailty and vulnerability of older people living in care homes but has also, in part, been a consequence of the failure to include care homes in the systematic planning of a response to COVID, as well as a measure of neglect of standards and quality improvement in the sector. In response, the EUGMS published a set of medical standards of care developed in consultation with experts across its member national societies in 2015. The standards consisted of seven core principles of medical care for physicians working in nursing homes as a first step in developing a programme of clinical, academic and policy engagement in improving medical care for older people who are living and frequently also dying as residents in nursing homes. The gravity of the concerns arising for nursing home care from the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as emerging insights on care improvement in nursing homes indicate that an update of these medical standards is timely. This was performed by the writing group from the original 2015 guidelines and is intended as an interim measure pending a more formal review incorporating a systematic review of emerging literature and a Delphi process.

Understanding barriers to effective management of influenza outbreaks by residential aged care facilities

OBJECTIVE

To identify the perceived barriers to the implementation of the Australian national guidelines on influenza outbreak management with Sydney Local Health District (SLHD) residential aged care facility (RACF) staff.

METHODS

All SLHD RACFs were invited to participate in a telephone interview. The questionnaire collected information about demographic characteristics and participants' level of agreement with statements regarding perceived barriers to implementing the national guidelines for influenza outbreak management.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight of 61 RACFs (46%) participated in the study. The three most common barriers identified were as follows: scepticism towards staff influenza vaccination (n = 13, 46%); the effort required to read the national guidelines (n = 11, 39%); and lack of infrastructure to physically separate residents during an outbreak (n = 10, 36%).

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend implementing and evaluating programmes which address misconceptions about influenza vaccination amongst RACF staff. Further, all RACF staff, including care staff, should receive targeted education on the role of infection control in influenza outbreak management.