Impact of an 8-Year Intensive Lifestyle Intervention on an Index of Multimorbidity

13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Diabetes and Multiple Long-term Conditions: A Review of Our Current Global Health Challenge

Use of effective treatments and management programs is leading to longer survival of people with diabetes. This, in combination with obesity, is thus contributing to a rise in people living with more than one condition, known as multiple long-term conditions (MLTC or multimorbidity). MLTC is defined as the presence of two or more long-term conditions, with possible combinations of physical, infectious, or mental health conditions, where no one condition is considered as the index. These include a range of conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, chronic kidney disease, arthritis, depression, dementia, and severe mental health illnesses. MLTC has major implications for the individual such as poor quality of life, worse health outcomes, fragmented care, polypharmacy, poor treatment adherence, mortality, and a significant impact on health care services. MLTC is a challenge, where interventions for prevention and management are lacking a robust evidence base. The key research directions for diabetes and MLTC from a global perspective include system delivery and care coordination, lifestyle interventions and therapeutic interventions.

Long-term Impact of a 10-Year Intensive Lifestyle Intervention on a Deficit Accumulation Frailty Index: Action for Health in Diabetes Trial

BACKGROUND

Multidomain lifestyle interventions may slow aging as captured by deficit accumulation frailty indices; however, it is unknown whether benefits extend beyond intervention delivery.

METHODS

We developed a deficit accumulation frailty index (FI-E) to span the 10 years that the Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) randomized controlled clinical trial delivered interventions (a multidomain lifestyle intervention focused on caloric restriction, increased physical activity, and diet compared to a control condition) and to extend across an additional 8 years post-delivery. The study cohort included 5 145 individuals, aged 45-76 years at enrollment, who had type 2 diabetes and either obesity or overweight.

RESULTS

Overall, FI-E scores were relatively lower among lifestyle participants throughout follow-up, averaging 0.0130 [95% confidence interval: 0.0104, 0.0156] (p < .001) less across the 18 years. During Years 1-8, the mean relative difference between control and lifestyle participants' FI-E scores was 0.0139 [0.0115, 0.0163], approximately 10% of the baseline level. During Years 9-18, this average difference was 0.0107 [0.0066, 0.0148]. Benefits were comparable for individuals grouped by baseline age and body mass index and sex but were not evident for those entering the trial with a history of cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidomain lifestyle intervention may slow biological aging long term, as captured by an FI-E. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT00017953.

Rationale, design, and cohort characteristics of the Action for Health in Diabetes Aging study

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes and overweight/obesity are described as accelerating aging processes, yet many individuals with these conditions maintain high levels of cognitive and physical function and independence late into life. The Look AHEAD Aging study is designed to identify 20-year trajectories of behaviors, risk factors, and medical history associated with resilience against geriatric syndromes and aging-related cognitive and physical functional deficits among individuals with these conditions.

METHODS

Look AHEAD Aging extends follow-up of the cohort of the former 10-year Look AHEAD trial. The original cohort (N = 5145) was enrolled in 2001 to 2004 when participants were aged 45 to 76 years and randomly assigned to a multidomain intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) or a diabetes support and education (DSE) condition. The trial interventions ceased in 2012. Clinic-based follow-up continued through 2020. In 2021, the cohort was invited to enroll in Look AHEAD Aging, an additional 4-year telephone-based follow-up (every 6 months) enhanced with Medicare linkage. Standardized protocols assess multimorbidity, physical and cognitive function, health care utilization, and health-related quality of life.

RESULTS

Of the original N = 5145 Look AHEAD participants, N = 1552 active survivors agreed to participate in Look AHEAD Aging. At consent, the cohort's mean age was 76 (range 63 to 94) years and participants had been followed for a mean of 20 years. Of the original Look AHEAD enrollees, those who were younger, female, or with no history of cardiovascular disease were more likely to be represented in the Look AHEAD Aging cohort. Intervention groups were comparable with respect to age, diabetes duration, body mass index, insulin use, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and cognitive function. ILI participants had significantly lower deficit accumulation index scores.

DISCUSSION

By continuing the long-term follow-up of an extensively characterized cohort of older individuals with type 2 diabetes, Look AHEAD Aging is well positioned to identify factors associated with resilience against aging-related conditions.

GLP-1 receptor agonist, liraglutide, protects podocytes from apoptosis in diabetic nephropathy by promoting white fat browning

Glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) belong to the class of incretin drugs. Incretin is a hormone secreted into blood by intestinal cells after food stimulation that induces insulin secretion. Liraglutide is a long-acting GLP-1RA that can reduce blood pressure, blood lipids, and inflammation. Previous studies showed that liraglutide can promote white fat browning and improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, no studies have linked white fat browning to kidney damage. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of liraglutide-induced white fat browning on podocyte apoptosis in diabetic nephropathy. We also aimed to determine whether podocytes express glucagon like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) and if liraglutide directly affects podocytes via GLP-1R. We assessed fat and renal function in db/db and wild-type mice and the effects of adipocyte conditioned medium on cultured podocytes. Liraglutide (400 mg/kg/d) was subcutaneously injected for 8 weeks. Liraglutide promoted white fat browning in vivo. During adipogenic differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells in vitro, liraglutide also upregulated expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator-1 alpha (PGC1α) and uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1), which can induce white fat browning in vitro. Furthermore, we found that supernatant from 3T3-L1 cells stimulated by liraglutide reduced podocyte apoptosis. The inhibitory effect of liraglutide on apoptosis was eliminated by exogenous TNF-α. Finally, podocytes express GLP-1R. In vivo and in vitro studies showed that the apoptosis of podocytes in diabetic nephropathy may be related to the effect of liraglutide on promoting white lipid browning. Similarly, liraglutide may directly affect podocytes via GLP-1R.

13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Eight-Year Changes in Multimorbidity and Frailty in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Associations With Cognitive and Physical Function and Mortality

BACKGROUND

Indices of multimorbidity and deficit accumulation (ie, frailty indices) have been proposed as markers of biological aging. If true, changes in these indices over time should predict downstream changes in cognition and physical function, and mortality.

METHODS

We examined associations that 8-year changes in (i) a multimorbidity index comprised of 9 chronic diseases and (ii) a frailty index (FI) based on deficit accumulation in functional, behavioral, and clinical characteristics had with subsequent measures of cognitive and physical function over 10 years. We drew data from 3 842 participants in the Action for Health in Diabetes clinical trial. They were aged 45-76 years at baseline and at risk for accelerated biological aging due to overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

A total of 1 501 (39%) of the cohort had 8-year increases of 1 among the 9 diseases tracked in the multimorbidity index and 868 (23%) had increases of ≥2. Those with greatest increases in multimorbidity tended to be older individuals, males, and non-Hispanic Whites. Greater FI increases tended to occur among individuals who were older, non-Hispanic White, heavier, and who had more baseline morbidities. Changes in multimorbidity and FI were moderately correlated (r = 0.26; p < .001). Increases in both multimorbidity and FI were associated with subsequently poorer composite cognitive function and 400-m walk speed and increased risk for death (all p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated biological aging, as captured by multimorbidity and frailty indices, predicts subsequent reduced function and mortality. Whether intensive lifestyle interventions generally targeting multimorbidity and FI reduce risks for downstream outcomes remains to be seen. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT00017953.

Impact of COVID-19 on life experiences reported by a diverse cohort of older adults with diabetes and obesity

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to measure the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-reported life experiences in older adults with diabetes and obesity.

METHODS

Participants were surveyed in 2020 regarding negative and positive impacts of the pandemic across domains of personal, social, and physical experiences. A cumulative negative risk index (a count of all reported negative impacts of 46 items) and a positive risk index (5 items) were characterized in relation to age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, and multimorbidity.

RESULTS

Response rate was high (2950/3193, 92%), average age was 76 years, 63% were women, and 39% were from underrepresented populations. Women reported more negative impacts than men (6.8 vs. 5.6; p < 0.001 [of 46 items]) as did persons with a greater multimorbidity index (p < 0.001). Participants reporting African American/Black race reported fewer negative impacts than White participants. Women also reported more positive impacts than men (1.9 vs. 1.6; p < 0.001 [of 5 items]).

CONCLUSIONS

Older adults with diabetes and obesity reported more positive impacts of the pandemic than negative impacts, relative to the number of positive (or negative) items presented. Some subgroups experienced greater negative impacts (e.g., for women, a greater multimorbidity index). Efforts to reestablish personal, social, and physical health after the pandemic could target certain groups.

Weight Change During the Postintervention Follow-up of Look AHEAD

OBJECTIVE

Patients with type 2 diabetes are encouraged to lose weight, but excessive weight loss in older adults may be a marker of poor health and subsequent mortality. We examined weight change during the postintervention period of Look AHEAD, a randomized trial comparing intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) with diabetes support and education (DSE) (control) in overweight/obese individuals with type 2 diabetes and sought to identify predictors of excessive postintervention weight loss and its association with mortality.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

These secondary analyses compared postintervention weight change (year 8 to final visit; median 16 years) in ILI and DSE in 3,999 Look AHEAD participants. Using empirically derived trajectory categories, we compared four subgroups: weight gainers (n = 307), weight stable (n = 1,561), steady losers (n = 1,731), and steep losers (n = 380), on postintervention mortality, demographic variables, and health status at randomization and year 8.

RESULTS

Postintervention weight change averaged -3.7 ± 9.5%, with greater weight loss in the DSE than the ILI group. The steep weight loss trajectory subgroup lost on average 17.7 ± 6.6%; 30% of steep losers died during postintervention follow-up versus 10-18% in other trajectories (P < 0001). The following variables distinguished steep losers from weight stable: baseline, older, longer diabetes duration, higher BMI, and greater multimorbidity; intervention, randomization to control group and less weight loss in years 1-8; and year 8, higher prevalence of frailty, multimorbidity, and depressive symptoms and lower use of weight control strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Steep weight loss postintervention was associated with increased risk of mortality. Older individuals with longer duration of diabetes and multimorbidity should be monitored for excessive unintentional weight loss.

Evaluation of a blood-based geroscience biomarker index in a randomized trial of caloric restriction and exercise in older adults with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Intermediate endpoints are needed to evaluate the effect of interventions targeting the biology of aging in clinical trials. A working group identified five blood-based biomarkers that may serve such a purpose as an integrated index. We evaluated the responsiveness of the panel to caloric restriction or aerobic exercise in the context of a randomized clinical trial conducted in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with obese phenotype who were predominantly female. Obese HFpEF is highly prevalent in women, and is a geriatric syndrome whose disease pathology is driven by non-cardiac factors and shared drivers of aging. We measured serum Interleukin-6, TNF-α-receptor-I, growth differentiating factor-15, cystatin C, and N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide at baseline and after 20 weeks in older participants with stable obese HFpEF participating in a randomized, controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial of caloric restriction and/or aerobic exercise. We calculated a composite biomarker index, summing baseline quintile scores for each biomarker, and analyzed the effect of the interventions on the index and individual biomarkers and their associations with changes in physical performance. This post hoc analysis included 88 randomized participants (71 women [81%]). The mean ± SD age was 66.6 ± 5.3 years, and body mass index (BMI) was 39.3 ± 6.3 kg/m2. Using mixed models, mean values of the biomarker index improved over 20 weeks with caloric restriction (- 0.82 [Formula: see text] 0.58 points, p = 0.05), but not with exercise (- 0.28 [Formula: see text] 0.59 points, p = [Formula: see text]), with no evidence of an interaction effect of CR [Formula: see text] EX [Formula: see text] time (p = 0.80) with adjustment for age, gender, and BMI. At baseline, the biomarker index was inversely correlated with 6-min walk distance, scores on the short physical performance battery, treadmill test peak workload and exercise time to exhaustion (all [Formula: see text] s = between - 0.21 and - 0.24). A reduction in the biomarker index was also associated with increased 4-m usual walk speed ([Formula: see text] s =  - 0.31). Among older patients with chronic obese HFpEF, caloric restriction improved a biomarker index designed to reflect biological aging. Moreover, the index was associated with physical performance and exercise tolerance.

Changes in the Prevalence of Symptoms of Depression, Loneliness, and Insomnia in U.S. Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Look AHEAD Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate changes in the prevalence of depressive symptoms, loneliness, and insomnia among older adults with type 2 diabetes from 2016 to 2020 and to assess risk factors for these conditions including demographics, multimorbidity, BMI, treatment group, and pre-coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) measure scores.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study of participants from the Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) cohort study. Data were from two assessments before COVID-19 (visit 1: April 2016-June 2018 and visit 2: February 2018-February 2020) and one assessment during COVID-19 (visit 3: July-December 2020). Surveys were administered to assess depressive symptoms, loneliness, and insomnia.

RESULTS

The study included 2829 adults (63.2% female, 60.6% White, mean [SD] age 75.6 [6.0] years). The prevalence of mild or greater depressive symptoms did not change significantly between the two pre-pandemic visits (P = 0.88) but increased significantly from pre- to during COVID-19 (19.3% at V2 to 30.4% at V3; P < 0.001). Higher odds of mild or greater depressive symptoms at V3 were associated with being female (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.4 [95% CI 1.1-1.7]), identifying as non-Hispanic White (OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.1-1.7]), having obesity (OR 1.3 [95% CI 1.0-1.5]), and reporting mild or greater depressive symptoms at V1 (OR 4.0 [95% CI 2.9-5.4]), V2 (OR 4.4 [95% CI 3.2-5.9]), or both visits (OR 13.4 [95% CI 9.7-18.4]). The prevalence of loneliness increased from 12.3% at V1 to 22.1% at V3 (P < 0.001), while the prevalence of insomnia remained stable across visits at 31.5-33.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of mild or greater depressive symptoms in older adults with diabetes was more than 1.6 times higher during COVID-19 than before the pandemic.

13. Older Adults: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-SPPC), are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-SINT). Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Does Lifestyle Intervention Improve Health of Adults with Overweight/Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes? Findings from the Look AHEAD Randomized Trial

This paper reviews the main findings from the Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) Trial, a randomized trial testing the long-term health effects of intensive lifestyle interventions (ILIs) in 5,145 persons with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes. Although the primary outcome originally focused on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, secondary outcomes included a broad range of health parameters related to diabetes and obesity. As the cohort aged, study outcomes were expanded to include health problems affecting geriatric populations, such as cognitive impairment and disability.This review summarizes the history of this trial and presents findings related to a wide range of health outcomes. Studies are reviewed that showed positive impact of ILI on diabetes control and complications, depression, physical health-related quality of life, sleep apnea, incontinence, brain structure, and health care use and costs. Several composite indices were also positively impacted by ILI, including multimorbidity, geriatric syndromes, and disability-free life years. However, there are also some important outcomes that did not show significant differences between the intervention and control, including cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, cancer, cognitive function, and cognitive impairment; for several of these nonsignificant effects, post hoc analyses suggested that there may be differences among subgroups, raising the possibility that ILI may be beneficial to some but potentially harmful to others. The only adverse effects of ILI relative to diabetes support and education were on frailty fractures and the related negative effects on body composition and bone density. Through this review, the manuscript seeks to determine whether weight loss should be encouraged in this population; given the large number of beneficial effects, relative to the small number of adverse effects, the answer appears to be yes.

Type 2 Diabetes Subgroups, Risk for Complications, and Differential Effects Due to an Intensive Lifestyle Intervention

OBJECTIVE

We reevaluated the Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) intervention, incorporating diabetes subgroups, to identify whether intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) is associated with differential risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) by diabetes subgroup.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In the Look AHEAD trial, 5,145 participants, aged 45-76 years, with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and overweight or obesity were randomly assigned to 10 years of ILI or a control condition of diabetes support and education. The ILI focused on weight loss through decreased caloric intake and increased physical activity. To characterize diabetes subgroups, we applied k-means clustering to data on age of diabetes diagnosis, BMI, waist circumference, and glycated hemoglobin. We examined whether relative intervention effects on the trial's prespecified CVD outcomes varied among diabetes subgroups.

RESULTS

We characterized four subgroups related to older age at diabetes onset (42% of sample), poor glucose control (14%), severe obesity (24%), and younger age at diabetes onset (20%). We observed interactions (all P < 0.05) between intervention and diabetes subgroups for three separate composite cardiovascular outcomes. Randomization to ILI was associated with increased risk for each cardiovascular outcome only among the poor-glucose-control subgroup (hazard ratio >1.32). Among the three other diabetes subgroups, ILI was not associated with increased risk for CVD.

CONCLUSIONS

Among overweight and obese adults with T2D, a lifestyle intervention was associated with differential risk for CVD that was dependent on diabetes subgroup. Diabetes subgroups may be important to identify the patients who would achieve benefit and avoid harm from an ILI.

12. Older Adults: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-SPPC), are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-SINT). Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.