Medicaid home and community-based services spending for older adults: Is there a "woodwork" effect?

Association Between Self-Direction and Personal Care Aide Wages

The supply of personal care aides (PCAs), who assist people receiving home care, is a growing concern. PCA shortages result, in part, from the low wages earned by these workers. State policies have had some effect on wages. Self-direction (SD) may be associated with wages because SD allows home care recipients to hire and manage workers, including setting wages in most states. We used wage data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to examine the association between SD and the wages of PCAs. We found implementation of SD did not have a consistent association with PCA wages, with wages improving in some states and worsening in others. We also found little difference in PCA wages between states that allow participants to set worker wages and those that do not. SD does not seem to improve PCA wages in states, so other policy strategies will be needed.

Performance Indicators for the Assessment of Aging-In-Place Reform Policies: A Scoping Review and Evidence Map

OBJECTIVES

Many countries have reformed their long-term care system to promote aging-in-place. Currently, there is no framework for evaluating these reforms. This review aimed to identify performance indicators used for aging-in-place reform evaluation.

DESIGN

A scoping review and evidence map of literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Long-term care reforms aimed at aging-in-place.

METHODS

The databases Medline, Embase, and Academic Search Premier were searched. Three independent reviewers screened the articles. Pairs of data collectors extracted the data, with conflicts determined by agreement or by a third reviewer. Performance indicators were classified into the Donabedian framework as structure, process, or outcome.

RESULTS

We retained 58 articles. From the included articles, 28 discussed structure indicators, comprising of 71 indicators in the domains expenditures, care availability, and workforce; 36 articles included process indicators comprising 80 indicators about care utilization, service quality, and service satisfaction; and 20 articles reported on outcome indicators comprising 34 indicators about health status and informal caregiving.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Most articles focused on the performance domains care expenditures and care utilization, whereas measuring effects on older adults and society was less common. A framework assessing system and services delivery indicators and the effects on those aging-in-place with actionable performance indicators is recommended.

Tracking long-term services and supports rebalancing through workforce data

OBJECTIVE

To understand trends in the long-term services and supports (LTSS) workforce and assess workforce data as a measure of progress in shifting LTSS resources from institutional to community-based settings.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING

Workforce data from the American Community Survey from 2008 to 2022.

STUDY DESIGN

Measures of LTSS rebalancing and institutional and community workforce supply per 1000 persons with LTSS needs were constructed. After showing national trends over the study period, state fixed effects regressions were used to evaluate the within-state relationship of these measures with existing measures of LTSS utilization. Workforce supply measures were compared to the percentage of state Medicaid LTSS spending spent in the community to assess their utility for across state comparisons. Each state's progress in LTSS rebalancing over the study period was then shown using workforce data.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

A sample of 336,316 LTSS workers and 3,015,284 people with LTSS needs over the study period was derived from American Community Survey data.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

From 2008 to 2022, the percentage of the LTSS workforce employed in the community rose from 44% to 58%. Thirty states saw more than a 10 percentage point increase. From 2008 to 2013, the size of the community workforce expanded dramatically but has since stagnated. In contrast, the institutional workforce entered a long-term decline beginning in 2015 that accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic. State fixed effects regressions showed that measures of workforce supply have a strong relationship with LTSS utilization measures for older adults, but not for younger people with disabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Workforce data can serve as an effective measure of changes in LTSS utilization for older adults. This offers researchers and policymakers a useful alternative to administrative claims, bypassing threats to comparability from coding changes and the shift to managed care. Additional data is needed on workforce trends in services for younger LTSS consumers.

2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures

This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including prevalence and incidence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care and the ramifications of AD for family caregivers, the dementia workforce and society. The Special Report discusses the larger health care system for older adults with cognitive issues, focusing on the role of caregivers and non-physician health care professionals. An estimated 6.9 million Americans age 65 and older are living with Alzheimer's dementia today. This number could grow to 13.8 million by 2060, barring the development of medical breakthroughs to prevent or cure AD. Official AD death certificates recorded 119,399 deaths from AD in 2021. In 2020 and 2021, when COVID-19 entered the ranks of the top ten causes of death, Alzheimer's was the seventh-leading cause of death in the United States. Official counts for more recent years are still being compiled. Alzheimer's remains the fifth-leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2021, deaths from stroke, heart disease and HIV decreased, whereas reported deaths from AD increased more than 140%. More than 11 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 18.4 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's or other dementias in 2023. These figures reflect a decline in the number of caregivers compared with a decade earlier, as well as an increase in the amount of care provided by each remaining caregiver. Unpaid dementia caregiving was valued at $346.6 billion in 2023. Its costs, however, extend to unpaid caregivers' increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes. Members of the paid health care and broader community-based workforce are involved in diagnosing, treating and caring for people with dementia. However, the United States faces growing shortages across different segments of the dementia care workforce due to a combination of factors, including the absolute increase in the number of people living with dementia. Therefore, targeted programs and care delivery models will be needed to attract, better train and effectively deploy health care and community-based workers to provide dementia care. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are almost three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 22 times as great. Total payments in 2024 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $360 billion. The Special Report investigates how caregivers of older adults with cognitive issues interact with the health care system and examines the role non-physician health care professionals play in facilitating clinical care and access to community-based services and supports. It includes surveys of caregivers and health care workers, focusing on their experiences, challenges, awareness and perceptions of dementia care navigation.

State home and community-based services expenditures and unmet care needs in the United States: Has everyone benefitted equally?

OBJECTIVE

To test whether the impacts of Medicaid's Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) expenditures have been equitable.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

This is a secondary data analysis. We linked annual data on state-level Medicaid HCBS expenditures with individual data from U.S. Health and Retirement Study (HRS; 2006-2016).

STUDY DESIGN

We evaluated the association between state-level HCBS expenditure quartiles and the risk of experiencing challenges in basic or instrumental activities of daily living (I/ADLs) without assistance (unmet needs for care). We fitted generalized estimating equations (GEE) with a Poisson distribution, log link function, and an unstructured covariance matrix. We controlled demographics, time, and place-based fixed effects and estimated models stratified by race and ethnicity, gender, and urbanicity. We tested the robustness of results with negative controls.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

Our analytic sample included HRS Medicaid beneficiaries, aged 55+, who had difficulty with ≥1 I/ADL (n = 2607 unique respondents contributing 4719 person-wave observations).

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Among adults with IADL difficulty, higher quartiles of HCBS expenditure (vs. the lowest quartile) were associated with a lower overall prevalence of unmet needs for care (e.g., Prevalence Ratio [PR], Q4 vs. Q1: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.98). This protective association was concentrated among non-Hispanic white respondents (Q4 vs. Q1: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.73-0.93); estimates were imprecise for Hispanic individuals and largely null for non-Hispanic Black participants. We found no evidence of heterogeneity by gender or urbanicity. Negative control robustness checks indicated that higher quartiles of HCBS expenditure were not associated with (1) the risk of reporting I/ADL difficulty among 55+ Medicaid beneficiaries, and (2) the risk of unmet care needs among non-Medicaid beneficiaries.

CONCLUSION

The returns to higher state-level HCBS expenditures under Medicaid for older adults with I/ADL disability do not appear to have been equitable by race and ethnicity.

Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic

The need to bolster Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS) became more evident during the COVID-19 pandemic. This recognition stemmed from the challenges of keeping people safe in nursing homes and the acute workforce shortages in the HCBS sector. This article examines two major federal developments and state responses in HCBS options as a result of the pandemic. The first initiative entails a one-year increase of the federal Medicaid matching rate for HCBS included in the American Rescue Plan Act championed by the Biden administration. The second initiative encompasses administrative flexibilities that permitted states to temporarily expand and modify their existing Medicaid HCBS programs. The article concludes that the effects of the pandemic flexibilities and enhanced federal funding on most state HCBS programs will be limited without continued investment and leadership on the part of the federal government, which is a Biden administration priority. States that make the American Rescue Act and COVID-19 flexibilities initiatives permanent are states that have the fiscal resources and political commitment to expanding HCBS benefits that other states lack. States' different approaches to bolstering Medicaid HCBS during the pandemic may contribute to widening disparities in access and quality of HCBS across states and populations who depend on Medicaid HCBS.