Efficacy and safety of IVIG in CIDP: Combined data of the PRIMA and PATH studies

A review of intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of neuroimmune conditions, acute COVID-19 infection, and post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 Syndrome

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is an immunomodulatory therapy that has been studied in several neuroimmune conditions, such as Guillain-Barré Syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, and multiple sclerosis. It has also been proposed as a potential treatment option for acute COVID-19 infection and post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC). IVIG is thought to function by providing the recipient with a pool of antibodies, which can, in turn, modulate immune responses through multiple mechanisms including neutralization of cytokines and autoantibodies, saturation of neonatal fragment crystallizable receptors, inhibition of complement activation, and regulation of T and B cell mediated inflammation. In acute COVID-19, studies have shown that early administration of IVIG and plasmapheresis in severe cases can reduce the need for mechanical ventilation, shorten ICU and hospital stays, and lower mortality. Similarly, in PASC, while research is still in early stages, IVIG has been shown to alleviate persistent symptoms in small patient cohorts. Furthermore, IVIG has shown benefits in another condition which has symptomatic overlap with PASC, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), though studies have yielded mixed results. It is important to note that IVIG can be associated with several potential adverse effects, such as anaphylaxis, headaches, thrombosis, liver enzyme elevations and renal complications. In addition, the high cost of IVIG can be a deterrent for payers and patients. This review provides a comprehensive update on the use of IVIG in multiple neuroimmune conditions, ME/CFS, acute COVID-19, and PASC, as well as covers its history, production, pricing, and mechanisms of action. We also identify key areas of future research, including the need to optimize the use of Ig product dosing, timing, and patient selection across conditions, particularly in the context of COVID-19 and PASC.

Characteristics and outcome of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy patients according to their diagnostic certainty based on the 2021 EAN/PNS criteria

INTRODUCTION

To describe the clinical characteristics and long term outcome of CIDP patients according to 2021 EAN/PNS diagnostic certainty categories.

METHODS

We reviewed clinical data, response to treatment, cerebrospinal fluid examination, and nerve conduction studies parameters of 39 adult "CIDP" and 24 "possible CIDP" patients. Data were collected at diagnosis and after one (T1), two (T2), three (T3) and five years (T5).

RESULTS

At diagnosis, "possible CIDP" patients' phenotypes were more atypical (especially focal/multifocal, p < .01) and "CIDP" patients had a higher NIS and INCAT scores (p = .08 and 0.08). Compared to baseline: median NIS score decreased in "CIDP" and was stable in "possible CIDP" patients at T1 (p < .05), T2 (p < .05) and T3 (p < .01); median MRC score slightly increased in "CIDP" and was stable in "possible CIDP" patients at T2 (p < .05); and INCAT disability scale slightly decreased in "CIDP" and was stable in "possible CIDP" patients at T3 (p < .05). The proportion of moderate to severely disabled (mRS > 2) patients in "possible CIDP" group was higher than in "CIDP" group (not significant). "CIDP" patients had a better objective response to immunotherapy (59 % responders) than "possible CIDP" patients (29 % responders, p < .05), especially among typical CIDP patients (86 % of responders in "CIDP" versus 33 % of responders in "possible CIDP" patients, p < .05).

CONCLUSION

"CIDP" patients had a more severe neuropathy, estimated with the NIS and INCAT scores, and "possible CIDP" patients had a more atypical phenotype at baseline. Our data suggest that long-term patient outcome and response to immunotherapy is better in "CIDP" than "possible CIDP".

Intravenous immunoglobulin for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) causes progressive or relapsing weakness and numbness of the limbs, which lasts for at least two months. Uncontrolled studies have suggested that intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) could help to reduce symptoms. This is an update of a review first published in 2002 and last updated in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin in people with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registers on 8 March 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that tested any dose of IVIg versus placebo, plasma exchange, or corticosteroids in people with definite or probable CIDP.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcome was significant improvement in disability within six weeks after the start of treatment, as determined and defined by the study authors. Our secondary outcomes were change in mean disability score within six weeks, change in muscle strength (Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score) within six weeks, change in mean disability score at 24 weeks or later, frequency of serious adverse events, and frequency of any adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for our main outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine RCTs with 372 participants (235 male) from Europe, North America, South America, and Israel. There was low statistical heterogeneity between the trial results, and the overall risk of bias was low for all trials that contributed data to the analysis. Five trials (235 participants) compared IVIg with placebo, one trial (20 participants) compared IVIg with plasma exchange, two trials (72 participants) compared IVIg with prednisolone, and one trial (45 participants) compared IVIg with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP). We included one new trial in this update, though it contributed no data to any meta-analyses. IVIg compared with placebo increases the probability of significant improvement in disability within six weeks of the start of treatment (risk ratio (RR) 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72 to 3.36; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 4, 95% CI 3 to 5; 5 trials, 269 participants; high-certainty evidence). Since each trial used a different disability scale and definition of significant improvement, we were unable to evaluate the clinical relevance of the pooled effect. IVIg compared with placebo improves disability measured on the Rankin scale (0 to 6, lower is better) two to six weeks after the start of treatment (mean difference (MD) -0.26 points, 95% CI -0.48 to -0.05; 3 trials, 90 participants; high-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with placebo probably improves disability measured on the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) scale (1 to 10, lower is better) after 24 weeks (MD 0.80 points, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.37; 1 trial, 117 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference between IVIg and placebo in the frequency of serious adverse events (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.87; 3 trials, 315 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The trial comparing IVIg with plasma exchange reported none of our main outcomes. IVIg compared with prednisolone probably has little or no effect on the probability of significant improvement in disability four weeks after the start of treatment (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.68; 1 trial, 29 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and little or no effect on change in mean disability measured on the Rankin scale (MD 0.21 points, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.61; 1 trial, 24 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference between IVIg and prednisolone in the frequency of serious adverse events (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.04 to 4.69; 1 cross-over trial, 32 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with IVMP probably increases the likelihood of significant improvement in disability two weeks after starting treatment (RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.40 to 5.38; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with IVMP probably has little or no effect on change in disability measured on the Rankin scale two weeks after the start of treatment (MD 0.24 points, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.63; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or on change in mean disability measured with the Overall Neuropathy Limitation Scale (ONLS, 1 to 12, lower is better) 24 weeks after the start of treatment (MD 0.03 points, 95% CI -0.91 to 0.97; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The frequency of serious adverse events may be higher with IVIg compared with IVMP (RR 4.40, 95% CI 0.22 to 86.78; 1 trial, 45 participants, moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from RCTs shows that IVIg improves disability for at least two to six weeks compared with placebo, with an NNTB of 4. During this period, IVIg probably has similar efficacy to oral prednisolone and IVMP. Further placebo-controlled trials are unlikely to change these conclusions. In one large trial, the benefit of IVIg compared with placebo in terms of improved disability score persisted for 24 weeks. Further research is needed to assess the long-term benefits and harms of IVIg relative to other treatments.

Current clinical management of CIDP with immunoglobulins in France: An expert opinion

Treatment strategies in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) must be adapted on a case-to-case basis. Validated and reproducible tools for monitoring treatment response are required at diagnosis, when initiating treatment and throughout follow-up. A task force of French neurologists, experts in neuromuscular disease reference centers, was assembled to provide expert advice on the management of typical CIDP with intravenous immunoglobulins (Ig), and to harmonize treatment practices in public and private hospitals. The task force also referred to the practical experience of treating CIDP with Ig at the diagnostic, induction and follow-up stages, including the assessment and management of Ig dependence, and following the recommendations of the French health agency.

Safety and Tolerability of Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: Results of the ProCID Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The ProCID study evaluated the efficacy and safety of three doses of a 10% liquid intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) preparation (panzyga®) in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). This report describes the safety findings.

METHODS

Patients were randomised to receive a 2.0 g/kg induction dose followed by maintenance doses of either 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 g/kg IVIg every 3 weeks over 24 weeks.

RESULTS

All 142 enrolled patients were included in the safety analyses. In total, 286 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 89 patients, of which 173 (60.5%) were considered treatment-related. Most TEAEs were of mild severity. Eleven serious TEAEs were reported in 6 patients. Two serious TEAEs in one patient (headache and vomiting) were considered related to treatment, which resolved without study discontinuation. No treatment-related thrombotic events, haemolytic transfusion reactions or deaths occurred. One patient discontinued the study due to a TEAE (allergic dermatitis) probably related to IVIg. Headache was the only dose-dependent TEAE, with incidences ranging from 2.9 to 23.7%, the incidence of all other TEAEs was similar across treatment groups. Most TEAEs were associated with the induction dose infusion, and the rate of TEAEs decreased thereafter. The median (IQR) daily IVIg dose was 78 (64-90) g, and 94.4% of patients tolerated the maximal infusion rate of 0.12 ml/kg/min without pre-medication.

INTERPRETATION

Infusions of 10% IVIg at doses up to 2.0 g/kg with high infusion rates were safe and well tolerated in patients with CIDP.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERS

EudraCT 2015-005443-14, NCT02638207.

Fingolimod ameliorates chronic experimental autoimmune neuritis by modulating inflammatory cytokines and Akt/mTOR/NF-κB signaling

OBJECTIVE

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated disease that targets the myelin sheaths of the peripheral nerves. Fingolimod is a sphingosine 1 phosphate (S1P) receptor antagonist with a high affinity for S1P receptors through the Akt-mTOR pathway, and prior research has suggested that it might be helpful in autoimmune illnesses.

METHODS

Chronic experimental autoimmune neuritis (c-EAN) was induced by immunizing Lewis rats with the S-palm P0(180-199) peptide, and then the treatment group was intraperitoneally injected with fingolimod (1 mg/kg) daily. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was used to assess the severity of nerve injury. Immunohistochemistry staining showed that fingolimod's anti-inflammatory effects on c-EAN rats might be realized through the NF-κB signaling pathway. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interferon-γ (INF-γ), interleukin-1beta (IL-1β), interleukin 6 (IL-6), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) were measured to evaluate the inflammation levels, and pAkt, p-S6, and p-p65 were used to measure the abundance of downstream activation markers to determine whether the Akt/mTOR/NF-κB signaling pathway was activated in the c-EAN model.

RESULTS

Fingolimod treatment reduced the inflammatory reaction and the expression of NF-κB in sciatic nerves. It also decreased the mRNA levels of the proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-6, iNOS, and ICAM-1 and pAkt, p-S6, and p-p65, representing the Akt/mTOR/NF-κB signaling pathway.

CONCLUSION

Our data showed that fingolimod could improve the disease course, alleviate the decrease in inflammation, and reduce proinflammatory cytokines through the Akt/mTOR/NF-κB axis in c-EAN rats, which could be beneficial for the development of CIDP-related research.

Sex differences in Guillain Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and experimental autoimmune neuritis

Guillain Barré syndrome (GBS) and its variants, and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP and its variants, are regarded as immune mediated neuropathies. Unlike in many autoimmune disorders, GBS and CIDP are more common in males than females. Sex is not a clear predictor of outcome. Experimental autoimmune neuritis (EAN) is an animal model of these diseases, but there are no studies of the effects of sex in EAN. The pathogenesis of GBS and CIDP involves immune response to non-protein antigens, antigen presentation through non-conventional T cells and, in CIDP with nodopathy, IgG4 antibody responses to antigens. There are some reported sex differences in some of these elements of the immune system and we speculate that these sex differences could contribute to the male predominance of these diseases, and suggest that sex differences in peripheral nerves is a topic worthy of further study.

Retrospective analysis of response to rituximab in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy refractory to first-line therapy

Few case reports/series describe the efficacy of rituximab in refractory chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), which is preferred in the presence of anti-nodal/paranodal antibodies. We aimed at evaluating the clinical response to rituximab in a subset of patients with refractory CIDP for whom the anti-nodal/paranodal antibodies status was unknown, as not available in Iran. We retrospectively analyzed the response to rituximab in 14 Iranian patients with refractory CIDP (3 children, 11 adults), in whom the anti-nodal/paranodal antibodies status was unknown. The subjects were evaluated with the Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score (MRCSS), Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability scores, and electrophysiology, before and after treatment. Mean age was 34.4 ± 20.7 years, disease duration pre-rituximab treatment was 27.8 ± 18.8 (range: 6-60) months, and mean follow-up duration was 18.5 ± 11.0 (range: 4-36) months. Considering the INCAT sum score, one worsened during post-rituximab treatment, and three patients did not change. Considering MRCSS, notably, four patients achieved normalization of their MRCSS. Regarding the corticosteroid dose, two patients could discontinue prednisolone. As rated by a pre-defined scoring system, nerve conduction parameters improved significantly post-rituximab in the treated cohort (P = .006). All patients tolerated rituximab infusions without adverse effects. Rituximab may be effective in refractory CIDP, even though worsening may occur in some patients. Anti-nodal/paranodal antibodies assay, when available, and other criteria may help drive therapeutic decision-making on rituximab as second-line treatment.

Posturography as a biomarker of intravenous immunoglobulin efficacy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Imbalance is a common feature of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) exerts clinical benefit in CIDP, including improving balance, although objective markers of efficacy are lacking. Posturography is an established objective marker of balance; therefore, this study aimed to determine the utility of posturography as an objective marker of treatment efficacy in CIDP.

METHODS

Posturography was performed on 18 CIDP patients, established on IVIg infusions, and results were compared to age-matched healthy controls. CIDP patients were assessed just prior to IVIg infusion and at the mid-point of the cycle. Center of pressure (CoP) was measured and the total path traveled by CoP (Sway Path, SP) was calculated for five different conditions: feet placed in parallel 16 cm apart at the medial border with eyes open (16cmEO) and eyes closed (16cmEC); medial borders of the feet touching with eyes open (0cmEO) and eyes closed (0cmEC); and tandem stance.

RESULTS

The sway path (SP) was significantly increased in CIDP patients (mean SP 1191 ± 104 mm) when compared to healthy controls (mean SP 724 ± 26 mm, P < .001). The increase was most prominent during eyes closed and tandem stance conditions. Treatment with IVIg significantly reduced SP when assessing 0cmEC (1759 ± 324 mm vs. 1081 ± 134 mm, P = .019) and tandem stance (1775 ± 290 mm vs. 1152 ± 113 mm, P = .027).

DISCUSSION

Posturography detected significant improvements in balance following IVIg in CIDP patients established on maintenance therapy. As such, posturography may be considered an objective marker of treatment response in clinical management and therapeutic trials.

Anti-Neurofascin 155 Antibody-Positive Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy/Combined Central and Peripheral Demyelination: Strategies for Diagnosis and Treatment Based on the Disease Mechanism

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated demyelinating disease of the peripheral nervous system (PNS). A small number of CIDP patients harbors autoantibodies against nodal/paranodal proteins, such as neurofascin 155 (NF155), contactin 1, and contactin-associated protein 1. In most cases, the predominant immunoglobulin (IgG) subclass is IgG4. Node/paranode antibody-positive CIDP demonstrates distinct features compared with antibody-negative CIDP, including a poor response to intravenous immunoglobulin. The neuropathology of biopsied sural nerve shows Schwann cell terminal loop detachment from axons without macrophage infiltration or inflammation. This is partly attributable to IgG4, which blocks protein-protein interactions without inducing inflammation. Anti-NF155 antibody-positive (NF155⁺) CIDP is unique because of the high frequency of subclinical demyelinating lesions in the central nervous system (CNS). This is probably because NF155 coexists in the PNS and CNS. Such cases showing demyelinating lesions in both the CNS and PNS are now termed combined central and peripheral demyelination (CCPD). NF155⁺ CIDP/CCPD commonly presents hypertrophy of spinal nerve roots and cranial nerves, such as trigeminal and oculomotor nerves, and extremely high levels of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein, which indicates nerve root inflammation. In the CSF, the CXCL8/IL8, IL13, TNFα, CCL11/eotaxin, CCL2/MCP1, and IFNγ levels are significantly higher and the IL1β, IL1ra, and GCSF levels are significantly lower in NF155⁺ CIDP than in non-inflammatory neurological diseases. Even compared with anti-NF155 antibody-negative (NF155^-) CIDP, the CXCL8/IL8 and IL13 levels are significantly higher and the IL1β and IL1ra levels are significantly lower than those in NF155⁺ CIDP. Canonical discriminant analysis revealed NF155⁺ and NF155^- CIDP to be separable with IL4, IL10, and IL13, the three most significant discriminators, all of which are required for IgG4 class switching. Therefore, upregulation of both Th2 and Th1 cytokines and downregulation of macrophage-related cytokines are characteristic of NF155⁺ CIDP, which explains spinal root inflammation and the lack of macrophage infiltration in the sural nerves. All Japanese patients with NF155⁺ CIDP/CCPD have one of two specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes, which results in a significantly higher prevalence of HLA-DRB1 ^* 15:01-DQB1 ^* 06:02 compared with healthy Japanese controls. This indicates an involvement of specific HLA class II molecules and relevant T cells in addition to IgG4 anti-NF155 antibodies in the mechanism underlying IgG4 NF155⁺ CIDP/CCPD.

Longer-term effects of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: Who benefits?

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) represent an established cornerstone for the immunotherapy of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Efficacy of IVIg for CIDP was proven in a large phase III trial. Yet, data on longer-term efficacy and effects in distinct subgroups are scarce. Our trial investigates the long-term efficacy of IVIg treatment in CIDP patients. In this observational real-world study, we retrospectively analyzed 49 CIDP patients receiving continuous IVIg treatment with a mean initial dosage of 87 g (1 g/kg body weight) every 4 weeks over a mean time of 45 months between 2010 and 2018. INCAT-Scores before the start of treatment and at the end of the observation period were compared. Over the observation period, IVIg treatment led to a median improvement of one INCAT score point. Subgroup analyses revealed a more pronounced improvement of INCAT scores in female CIDP patients, individuals with relapsing disease courses, patients with more pronounced motor impairment (higher initial INCAT scores) and in the cohort without need for concomitant other immunotherapies. These data argue for sustained beneficial effects of longer-term immunotherapy with IVIg in CIDP, particularly in females and relapsing disease forms with higher disease activity.

An international multicenter efficacy and safety study of IqYmune in initial and maintenance treatment of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: PRISM study

This prospective, multicenter, single‐arm, open‐label phase 3 study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IqYmune in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Patients received one induction dose of 2 g/kg and then seven maintenance doses of 1 g/kg at 3‐week intervals. The primary endpoint was the responder rate at the end of study (EOS), defined as an improvement of ≥1 point on the adjusted inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment (INCAT) disability scale. The responder rate was compared with the responder rate of a historical placebo group (33.3%). Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline to EOS of adjusted INCAT disability score, grip strength, Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score, Rasch‐modified MRC sum score, Rasch‐built overall disability scale score and the clinical global impression. Forty‐two patients, including 23 Ig‐naïve and 19 Ig‐pre‐treated, were included in the efficacy set. The overall response rate at EOS was 76.2% (95% confidence interval [60.5%‐87.9%]). The superiority of IqYmune compared to the historical placebo control was demonstrated (P < .0001). The responder rate was numerically higher in Ig‐pre‐treated than in Ig‐naïve patients but confidence intervals were overlapping (84.2% [60.4%‐96.6%] vs 69.6% [47.1%‐86.8%]). All secondary endpoints confirmed this conclusion. The median time to response was 15 weeks [8.9‐19.1 weeks]. A total of 156 adverse events including five serious were considered related to IqYmune, 87.2% were mild. Neither hemolysis nor signs of renal or hepatic impairment were observed. These results demonstrate that IqYmune is an effective and well‐tolerated treatment in patients with CIDP.

Efficacy and safety of high infusion rate IVIG in CIDP

BACKGROUND

We aimed to determine the safety and tolerance of higher rates of infusion of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP).

METHODS

Patients began infusions with 10% IVIG at the standard rate of 0.08 mL/kg/min. If tolerated, infusion rates were incrementally increased to 0.14 mL/kg/min. We considered the frequency of infusions with adverse events (AEs) as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Nineteen of 25 patients safely tolerated the maximum rate of 0.14 mL/kg/min. We observed 25 treatment-related AEs (TAEs) over 13 infusions at standard or transitional rates, across seven patients. We observed no TAEs associated with the maximum infusion rate.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that 10% IVIG can be safely administered at a high infusion rate (0.14 ml/kg/min) in most CIDP patients, reducing the treatment time and burden on healthcare resources.

Systematic literature review of burden of illness in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP)

Background

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare neurological disorder characterised by muscle weakness and impaired sensory function. The present study provides a comprehensive literature review of the burden of illness of CIDP.

Methods

Systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and key conferences in May 2019. Search terms identified studies on the epidemiology, humanistic burden, current treatment, and economic burden of CIDP published since 2009 in English.

Results

Forty-five full texts and nineteen conference proceedings were identified on the epidemiology (n = 9), humanistic burden (n = 7), current treatment (n = 40), and economic burden (n = 8) of CIDP. Epidemiological studies showed incidence and prevalence of 0.2–1.6 and 0.8–8.9 per 100,000, respectively, depending on geography and diagnostic criteria. Humanistic burden studies revealed that patients experienced physical and psychosocial burden, including impaired physical function, pain and depression. Publications on current treatments reported on six main types of therapy: intravenous immunoglobulins, subcutaneous immunoglobulins, corticosteroids, plasma exchange, immunosuppressants, and immunomodulators. Treatments may be burdensome, due to adverse events and reduced independence caused by treatment administration setting. In Germany, UK, France, and the US, CIDP economic burden was driven by direct costs of treatment and hospitalisation. CIDP was associated with indirect costs driven by impaired productivity.

Conclusions

This first systematic review of CIDP burden of illness demonstrates the high physical and psychosocial burden of this rare disease. Future research is required to fully characterise the burden of CIDP, and to understand how appropriate treatment can mitigate burden for patients and healthcare systems.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00415-020-09998-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Long-term treatment with subcutaneous immunoglobulin in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a follow-up period up to 7 years

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare and heterogeneous acquired sensory-motor polyneuropathy with autoimmune pathogenesis. Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) are a well-established therapy for CIDP: it is well known that at least two-thirds of these patients need these infusions for several years. More recently, Subcutaneous Immunoglobulins (SCIg) have been proved to be effective: this finding has been confirmed either in isolated cases or in few randomized trials. However, it appeared that the longest SCIg treatment follow up lasted no longer than 48 months. We report herein the results of a long-term SCIg treatment with a follow up period up to 7 years (84 months), considering safety, tolerability and patients’ perception of SCIg treatment in a CIDP population. We studied 17 patients (10 M; 7 F) with a diagnosis of CIDP, defined according to the EFNS/PNS criteria, successfully treated with IVIG every 4/6 weeks before being switched to SCIg treatment. Clinical follow-up included, apart from a routinely clinical assessment, the administration of Medical Research Council (MRC) sum-score, the Overall Neuropathy Limitation Scale (ONLS) and the Life Quality Index questionnaire (LQI). The results showed that, in the majority of this pre-selected group of CIDP patients (16/17), SCIg were well tolerated and were preferred over IVIG. Strength and motor functions remained stable or even improved during the long term follow-up (up to 84 months) with benefits on walking capability and resistance, manual activity performances and fatigue reduction.

Low-dose subcutaneous immunoglobulin is an effective treatment for autoimmune bullous skin disorders: A case report

Intravenous immunoglobulin is a recognized treatment in recalcitrant autoimmune bullous diseases. Infusions are administered monthly over 1-5 days in the hospital setting and associated with mild to severe infusion-related systemic effects, in part due to the high doses necessary to induce and achieve remission. We present a case series of four patients with bullous diseases treated successfully with low-dose subcutaneous IgG who achieved remission with maintenance therapy. Patient-administered smaller, more frequent doses of IgG into subcutaneous tissue more closely mimics the body's own antibody production and produces a more stable serum trough level. Subcutaneous IgG is a novel treatment approach in bullous diseases which can induce a state remission.

Rituximab in refractory chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a disorder in which early effective treatment is important to minimize disability from axonal degeneration. It has been suggested that some patients with CIDP may benefit from rituximab therapy, but there is no definitive evidence for this.

METHODS

Baseline and post-rituximab-therapy neuromuscular Medical Research Council (MRC) sum scores, Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score, and functional status were assessed in 11 patients with refactory CIDP.

RESULTS

The MRC sum score, INCAT disability score, and functional status improved in all patients after rituximab therapy.

DISCUSSION

Our study provides evidence of the efficacy of rituximab therapy in at least some patients with CIDP. A placebo-controlled study to assess the effectiveness of rituximab therapy in CIDP with and without nodal antibodies is required to identify disease markers that predict responsiveness.

Efficacy and safety of IVIG in CIDP: Combined data of the PRIMA and PATH studies

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is a potential therapy for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). To investigate the efficacy and safety of the IVIG IgPro10 (Privigen) for treatment of CIDP, results from Privigen Impact on Mobility and Autonomy (PRIMA), a prospective, open‐label, single‐arm study of IVIG in immunoglobulin (Ig)‐naïve or IVIG pre‐treated subjects (NCT01184846, n = 28) and Polyneuropathy And Treatment with Hizentra (PATH), a double‐blind, randomized study including an open‐label, single‐arm IVIG phase in IVIG pre‐treated subjects (NCT01545076, IVIG restabilization phase n = 207) were analyzed separately and together (n = 235). Efficacy assessments included change in adjusted inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment (INCAT) score, grip strength and Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and ADRs/infusion were recorded. Adjusted INCAT response rate was 60.7% in all PRIMA subjects at Week 25 (76.9% in IVIG pre‐treated subjects) and 72.9% in PATH. In the pooled cohort (n = 235), INCAT response rate was 71.5%; median time to INCAT improvement was 4.3 weeks. No clear demographic differences were noticed between early (responding before Week 7, n = 148) and late responders (n = 21). In the pooled cohort, median change from baseline to last observation was −1.0 (interquartile range −2.0; 0.0) point for INCAT score; +8.0 (0.0; 20.0) kPa for maximum grip strength; +3.0 (1.0; 7.0) points for MRC sum score. In the pooled cohort, 271 ADRs were reported in 105 subjects (44.7%), a rate of 0.144 ADRs per infusion. This analysis confirms the efficacy and safety of IgPro10, a recently FDA‐approved IVIG for CIDP, in a population of mainly pre‐treated subjects with CIDP [Correction added on 14 March 2019 after first online publication: the INCAT response rate has been corrected.].