Adherence to systemic therapy in patients with psoriasis during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multicenter study

Adherence to Psoriasis Therapies

Understanding the underlying causes of nonadherence among patients with psoriasis and adopting strategies to address these issues may allow providers to share responsibility and work alongside patients to overcome these barriers. The review explores patient adherence to different types of psoriasis treatment, suggestions for interventions to overcome barriers, and methods to promote adherence that have been published in the literature.

Perception and Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic in Psoriasis Patients: Data from the German PsoBest and the CoronaBest Registries

Background

Limited data are available characterizing the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on psoriasis care for patients in Germany.

Objective

To analyze patient perception and impact of the pandemic on well-being and psoriasis management of German patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis or psoriasis arthritis under systemic therapies.

Methods

The CoronaBest registry captures events of SARS-CoV-2 infections and analyzes the impact of the pandemic on patients with psoriasis or psoriasis arthritis. In June 2020, and independently in February 2022, patients with psoriasis or psoriasis arthritis received a standardized questionnaire for current treatment, protective measures, well-being, and individual risks for COVID-19, among others.

Results

Included were 4,194 patients in 2020 (mean age of 47.7 years and 41.8% women) and 4,818 patients in 2022 (mean age of 56.4 and 42.9% women). Treatment discontinuations were observed in 2.7% and 1.7% of patients in 2020 and 2022, respectively. In the vast majority of the cases (>92%), no additional measures were taken concerning the management of psoriasis treatments in either 2020 or 2022. Those patients with changes reported most frequently: telephone calls instead of face-to-face visits (80.2%, in 2020 vs 40.5% in 2022) or more frequent controls (27.1%, 2020 vs 22.0%, 2022). A majority (66.7%, 2020, and 70.6%, 2022) did not perceive the virus as a considerable threat. The proportion of patients feeling well informed about COVID-19 by physicians increased from 42.6% in 2020 to 51.8% in 2022. About 81.1% of patients in 2020 and 67.5% in 2022 stated that their overall personal condition was not affected due to the pandemic. Physicians attributed no special risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 in most of the patients.

Conclusion

A high rate of systemic treatment persistence and awareness of risks and protective measures indicate that health care for psoriasis largely followed current national and international recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

How does the COVID-19 pandemic impact medication adherence of patients with chronic disease?: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To determine how the COVID-19 pandemic impacts patients with chronic disease medication adherence.

METHODS

Four electronic databases, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL Plus Full Text, were searched for literature between 2019 and 2021. Abstracts and later full texts were independently screened by the authors of this review using inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine relevance to our study. Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools were used to assess the quality of included texts. Relevant information and data from the included texts were extracted into tables for data synthesis and analysis.

RESULTS

Ten studies met the study criteria, the most popular study design was cross-sectional design (n = 9, 90.0%), others were case series (n = 1, 10.0%). Barriers to medication adherence and facilitators of medication adherence were the major two themes that participants reported regarding the impact of COVID-19 on medication adherence. Moreover, these two main themes have been organized in sub-themes that are dealt with in-depth.

DISCUSSION

Our results could heighten healthcare providers, stakeholders, and policy leaders' awareness of providing appropriate support for chronic disease patients, especially regarding medication adherence. Future research incorporating programs that support patients' needs is recommended.

Clinical course of psoriasis patients that discontinued biologics during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

Since psoriasis is a chronic disease, it is not recommended to discontinue the treatment agents used. However, in real life, the treatment of psoriasis patients may be interrupted for various reasons. During the pandemic period, the treatment of many patients was also interrupted.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate relapse and clinical worsening in psoriasis patients whose biological therapy was interrupted during the pandemic and reveal associated factors.

METHODS

The study included patients aged ≥18 years, who were followed up with moderate and severe chronic psoriasis controlled by the last biological agent [Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 75 response achieved] but had to discontinue their treatment during the pandemic. The patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, clinical course after the discontinuation of these agents, presence of clinical worsening, and relapse were evaluated. Risk factors were analyzed with the logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The study included 169 patients, with a mean age of 47.3 ± 14.5 (18-87) years. The mean biologics-free time was 18.2 ± 12.3 (2-56) weeks. Clinical worsening was detected in 41.4% and relapse in 48.5% of the patients. The significant risk factors for clinical worsening and relapse in both univariate and multivariate analyses were alcohol use during the biologics-free period, total time off biologics, and the presence of an additional triggering factor. The use of secukinumab and ustekinumab was found to be a protective factor against clinical worsening in multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSION

As the biologics-free period is prolonged, the likelihood of clinical worsening and relapse increases, therefore, we do not recommend discontinuing biological agents.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Adherence to Chronic Therapies: A Systematic Review

The spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused a sudden and significant disruption in healthcare services, especially for patients suffering from chronic diseases. We aimed at evaluating the impact of the pandemic on adherence to chronic therapies through a systematic review of available studies. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched since inception to June 2022. Inclusion criteria were: (1) observational studies or surveys; (2) studies on patients with chronic diseases; (3) reporting the effects of COVID-19 pandemic on adherence to chronic pharmacological treatment, as a comparison of adherence during the pandemic period vs. pre-pandemic period (primary outcome) or as rate of treatment discontinuation/delay specifically due to factors linked to COVID-19 (secondary outcome). Findings from 12 (primary outcome) and 24 (secondary outcome) studies showed that many chronic treatments were interrupted or affected by a reduced adherence in the pandemic period, and that fear of infection, difficulty in reaching physicians or healthcare facilities, and unavailability of medication were often reported as reasons for discontinuation or modification of chronic therapies. For other therapies where the patient was not required to attend the clinic, continuity of treatment was sometimes ensured through the use of telemedicine, and the adherence was guaranteed with drug stockpiling. While the effects of the possible worsening of chronic disease management need to be monitored over time, positive strategies should be acknowledged, such as the implementation of e-health tools and the expanded role of community pharmacists, and may play an important role in preserving continuity of care for people with chronic diseases.

Treatment Adherence in Dermatology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic raised many challenges for dermatology. Safety is a principal concern for many patients, particularly those on medications that affect the immune system. Understanding how the pandemic affects patients' treatment adherence may be informative for counseling or other interventions to assure that treatment plans are not inappropriately interrupted, or for future pandemics. The purpose of this review was to investigate the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic affected medication adherence in dermatology. A literature search of PubMed was performed using the search terms: adherence, compliance, dermatology, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2), and pandemic. Eleven primary research studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. During the COVID-19 pandemic, non-adherence in dermatology patients was primarily linked to concern about the risk of COVID-19 infection with long-term use of immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive medications. In some cases, non-adherence was associated with feelings of depression, anxiety, or perceived stress. High adherence was attributed to regular and convenient communication between patients and dermatology providers through the effective use of telemedicine and electronic messaging. Frequent communication with providers to address patient concerns and provide continuity of care improved adherence. An integrated virtual approach to patient care facilitated this, particularly through the use of telemedicine. Implementation of routine virtual questionnaires was, to some extent, effective in replacing limited in-person patient-provider interactions during the pandemic. Finally, the added threat of the pandemic presented an additional mental health component to consider for patients, supporting the need for a multidisciplinary approach to patient care.

The effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on illness perceptions of psoriasis and the role of depression: Findings from a cross-sectional study

Background

Illness perceptions in psoriasis have an impact on adherence and disability. Changes in dermatological healthcare provision during the Covid-19 pandemic and distress may have affected illness perceptions in psoriasis patients.

Objectives

To test whether illness perceptions about psoriasis changed during the first year of the Covid-19 pandemic compared to pre-pandemic in a tertiary population with psoriasis and whether pandemic effects differed depending on depressive burden, given this population's high depression prevalence.

Methods

In a cross-sectional survey of n = 188 tertiary patients with dermatologist-confirmed psoriasis recruited before and during the pandemic, eight illness perceptions domains were assessed using the Brief-Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (BIPQ). Presence of depression was assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

Results

Beliefs about treatment control and patients' understanding of psoriasis were significantly worse in patients responding during the pandemic compared to before Covid-19. These differences were greater when depression was absent (treatment control: adjusted p < 0.001; coherence: adjusted p = 0.01). However, participants during the pandemic felt less emotionally affected (adjusted p = 0.02) and concerned (adjusted p = 0.007) about psoriasis, independently of depression.

Conclusions

We found diverse pandemic effects on illness perception domains in psoriasis. Uncertainty and reduced healthcare access may drive poorer treatment and coherence beliefs during Covid-19. These beliefs can hinder patients' health-promoting behaviours and may explain the high pandemic non-adherence reported previously in psoriasis. Appropriate interventions are needed to establish positive long-term cognitions and improve psoriasis management, for example, using the PsoWell patient materials. Dermatology services should invest in engaging and educating patients regardless of concurrent psychological distress.

Letter to the editor regarding article "Gu L, Diaz SM, Lipner SR. Retrospective study of acne telemedicine and in-person visits at an academic center during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(1):36-38."

‐