Nurses’ identification and reporting of medication errors

Factors Influencing Novice and Beginner Nurses' Intention to Report Medication Errors and Near Misses

INTRODUCTION

Novice and beginner nurses make more medical errors than senior nurses. However, there is significant underreporting of medication errors and near misses among novice and beginner nurses.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the factors that influence the intention of novice and beginner nurses to report medication errors and near misses.

METHODS

A cross-sectional exploratory study was carried out among third-year nursing students in a Quebec university (n = 143). Data was collected through a self-reported questionnaire based on the adapted Theory of Planned Behavior. Simple descriptive analyses and a series of contingency analyses were performed using Chi-2 or Fisher exact tests. Correction of multiple tests was done using Bonferroni test.

RESULTS

All theoretical constructs were significantly associated with intention. Sociodemographic factors (age, sex, experience and education program) were also associated with intention.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Further studies are needed to identify the determinants of intention to report medication errors and near misses among novice and beginner nurses. More attention is required in nursing practice and education to act on these factors, thus encouraging novice and beginner nurses to report medication errors and near misses.

Paediatric Emergency Nurses' Perception of Medication Errors: A Qualitative Study

Patient safety is fundamental to healthcare. Adverse events, particularly medication errors, cause harm to patients, especially the paediatric population in the emergency department.

AIM

To explore paediatric emergency nurses' perceptions of medication administration errors.

METHOD

A qualitative, ethnomethodological, descriptive study. The participants were nurses working in the paediatric emergency department. Data were collected through in-depth individual interviews with paediatric emergency nurses. The study excluded nurses employed for less than six months. Ten individual interviews were carried out. All interviews were face-to-face and audio-recorded with the participant's consent. Interviews took between 52 min and 1 h 25 min. A questions guide was followed during the interviews. The analysis of the data was carried out according to the scheme proposed by Taylor and Bogdan.

RESULTS

The participants' discourse revealed three main categories: Safety culture, transmitted by supervisors and safety groups. Teamwork, with good communication and a positive relationship. Error management, the lack of formal support and negative feelings despite an understanding of the multifactorial nature of errors. The study identifies several challenges in the healthcare system. Emphasis was placed on the perception of errors in terms of patient harm, while near misses or dose delays or omissions are not treated as errors.

CONCLUSIONS

Although institutions have implemented safety culture strategies, nurses have not fully embraced them. There is a need to promote a positive safety culture and a safe working environment that encourages communication within the team. The hospital should provide training in safe management and patient safety and develop effective protocols. This study was not registered.

Paediatric medication incident reporting: a multicentre comparison study of medication errors identified at audit, detected by staff and reported to an incident system

OBJECTIVES

To compare medication errors identified at audit and via direct observation with medication errors reported to an incident reporting system at paediatric hospitals and to investigate differences in types and severity of errors detected and reported by staff.

METHODS

This is a comparison study at two tertiary referral paediatric hospitals between 2016 and 2020 in Australia. Prescribing errors were identified from a medication chart audit of 7785 patient records. Medication administration errors were identified from a prospective direct observational study of 5137 medication administration doses to 1530 patients. Medication errors reported to the hospitals' incident reporting system were identified and matched with errors identified at audit and observation.

RESULTS

Of 11 302 clinical prescribing errors identified at audit, 3.2 per 1000 errors (95% CI 2.3 to 4.4, n=36) had an incident report. Of 2224 potentially serious prescribing errors from audit, 26.1% (95% CI 24.3 to 27.9, n=580) were detected by staff and 11.2 per 1000 errors (95% CI 7.6 to 16.5, n=25) were reported to the incident system. Although the prescribing error detection rates varied between the two hospitals, there was no difference in incident reporting rates regardless of error severity. Of 40 errors associated with actual patient harm, only 7 (17.5%; 95% CI 8.7% to 31.9%) were detected by staff and 4 (10.0%; 95% CI 4.0% to 23.1%) had an incident report. None of the 2883 clinical medication administration errors observed, including 903 potentially serious errors and 144 errors associated with actual patient harm, had incident reports.

CONCLUSION

Incident reporting data do not provide an accurate reflection of medication errors and related harm to children in hospitals. Failure to detect medication errors is likely to be a significant contributor to low error reporting rates. In an era of electronic health records, new automated approaches to monitor medication safety should be pursued to provide real-time monitoring.

Factors influencing the reporting of medication errors and near misses among nurses: A systematic mixed methods review

AIM

This study aimed to systematically review empirical evidence on factors influencing nurses to report medication errors and near misses.

BACKGROUND

There is underreporting of medication errors among nurses, in particular among novice and beginner nurses. To improve quality of care, factors influencing the reporting of medication errors and near misses should be documented.

METHOD

A systematic mixed methods review was conducted. CINAHL, Cochrane Collaboration, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases were explored and analysed from December 1990 to December 2023. Two reviewers independently selected and extracted data using a standardized data extraction grid. Data were analysed using thematic analysis based on the adapted theory of planned behaviour.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies met the eligibility criteria. Principal factors influencing the reporting of medication errors and near misses among nurses were associated with perceived behavioural control, subjective norm and attitude. Few studies examined factors influencing reporting medication errors and near misses among novice and beginner nurses, and sociodemographic and professional factors.

CONCLUSION

To understand factors influencing reporting of medication errors and near misses, further studies should be conducted to investigate sociodemographic and professional factors.

Intervention to improve adverse event reporting in the emergency department: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Adverse event reporting is crucial for improving patient safety and identifying areas for improvement in the emergency department. Many interventions have been employed in that regard, and have been found to increase adverse event reporting rates in various settings. All published research that studied the various interventions and their effectiveness on adverse event reporting in the Emergency Department will be reviewed in this paper.

METHODS

CINAHL, PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Reviews Library, EMBASE, Scopus, OVID, Science Direct and Web of Science will all be searched. Studies published since January 2000 that investigated the interventions to improve adverse event reporting will be included. Two independent reviewers will execute the selection and extraction process, and we will carry out a qualitative synthesis. A meta-analysis, if possible, will be undertaken.

DISCUSSION

The present study will summarize interventions to improve adverse event reporting. It will also determine effective approaches to enhancing adverse event reporting in the emergency department. The outcome of the study will provide novel dimensions into possible interventions to improve patient safety through adverse event reporting.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Protocol registration and reporting: PROSPERO CRD42023414795.

An analysis of the psychometric properties of the medication safety competence scale in Turkish

PURPOSE

Considering the key roles and responsibilities of nurses in ensuring medication safety, it is necessary to understand nurses' competence in medication safety. Therefore, it was aimed to introduce a scale evaluating the medication safety competence of nurses into Turkish and to contribute to the literature by determining the medication safety competence levels of nurses.

METHODS

A methodological and descriptive research design was utilised. The population consisted of nurses in Turkey, and the sample comprised 523 nurses who volunteered to participate.

RESULTS

The content validity index of the scale was 0.98, and the scale showed a good fit (χ2/df = 3.00, RMSEA = 0.062). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.97, indicating high reliability. The mean score was 4.12, which was considered high. Participants who were 40 years old or above, married, and graduates of health vocational schools or postgraduate programs, along with those who had received medication safety training, had higher medication safety competence scores.

CONCLUSION

This study presents strong evidence that the Turkish version of the Medication Safety Competency Scale is valid and reliable when administered to nurses. The participants in this study had high levels of medication safety competence.

Nursing students' perspectives on patients' safety competencies: a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Nurses constitute the largest body of healthcare professionals globally, positioning them at the forefront of enhancing patient safety. Despite their crucial role, there is a notable gap in the literature regarding the comprehension and competency of nursing students in patient safety within Egypt. This gap underscores the urgent need for research to explore how nursing students perceive patient safety and the extent to which these competencies are integrated into their clinical and educational experiences. Understanding these perspectives is essential for developing targeted interventions that can significantly improve patient safety outcomes. The objective of this study was to fill this gap by assessing the perspectives of nursing intern students on patient safety competencies, thereby contributing to the global efforts in enhancing patient safety education and practice.

METHODS

In this research, a cross-sectional study design was employed to investigate the topic at hand. A purposive sample of 266 nursing intern students was enrolled from the Faculty of Nursing at Mansoura University. The data were collected using a patient safety survey. Subsequently, the collected data underwent analysis through the application of descriptive and inferential statistical techniques using SPSS-20 software.

RESULTS

Among the studied intern nursing students, we found that 55.3% and 59.4% of the involved students agreed that they could understand the concept of patient safety and the burden of medical errors. Regarding clinical safety issues, 51.1% and 54.9% of the participating students agreed that they felt confident in what they had learned about identifying patients correctly and avoiding surgical errors, respectively. Concerning error reporting issues, 40.2% and 37.2% of the involved students agreed that they were aware of error reports and enumerated the barriers to incident reporting, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the nursing student patient safety overview domain and their age (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study's compelling data demonstrated that intern students who took part in the patient safety survey scored higher overall in all patient safety-related categories. However, problems with error reporting showed the lowest percentage. The intern students would benefit from additional educational and training workshops to increase their perspectives on patients' safety competencies.

[Nurses and prescribers' choice of an electric syringe pump protocol for intravenous heparin administration]

OBJECTIVES

Several protocols for administering heparin by electric syringe pump can coexist within the same hospital. This puts patients at risk of medication errors. In our hospital trust, two preparation protocols coexist (20000UI/48mL and 25000UI/50mL). The objective is to relate the work carried out with prescribers and nurses to retain only one protocol.

METHODS

We questioned prescribers and nurses about the differences between the two protocols in terms of the simplicity of implementation and the risk of error to which nurses are exposed when preparing the syringe. Contextual information (heparin shortage, waste) was given in order to support the answers.

RESULTS

According to the 96 nurses and 82 prescribers who responded, the protocol to use is 25000IU/50mL for 98% and 83% of them respectively. The 20000IU/48mL protocol was considered the riskiest due to the possibility of mistakenly collecting 5mL instead of the required 4mL. Given the heparin shortage, the waste inherent to the 20000IU/48mL protocol reinforced this choice.

CONCLUSIONS

The consultation of nurses and prescribers allowed the choice of a protocol with very strong agreement. This work also brought to light what appears to be a medical misconception, namely that the non-concerted choice by physicians of a mode of administration of a drug can put nurses in a situation to make preparation errors more frequently. This emphasizes that nurses must be stakeholders in the decision-making processes that affect their practice.

Evaluation of medication errors in nursing during the COVID-19 pandemic and their relationship with shift work at teaching hospitals: a cross-sectional study in Iran

Introduction

Medication errors in nursing negatively affect the quality of the provided health-treatment services and society's mentality about the health system, threatening the patient's life. Therefore, this study evaluates medication errors in nursing during the COVID-19 pandemic and their relationship with shift work at teaching hospitals.

Materials and methods

All the nurses working at teaching hospitals affiliated with Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (southwest of Iran) comprised the statistical population of this research (260 participants). Data were collected using three questionnaires: a demographic characteristics questionnaire, a medication error questionnaire, and the standard Circadian Type Inventory (CTI) for a normal physiological cycle.

Results

At least one medication error was observed in 83.1% of nurses during their work span. A medication error was found in 36.2% of nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic (over the past year). Most medication errors (65.8%) occurred during the night shift. A significant relationship was detected between medication errors and shift work. Medicating one patient's drug to another (28.84%) and giving the wrong dose of drugs (27.69) were the most common types of medication errors. The utmost medication error was reported in emergency wards. The fear of reporting (with an average of 33.06) was the most important reason for not reporting medication errors (p < 0.01).

Discussion and conclusion

Most nurses experienced a history of medication errors, which were increased by shift work and the COVID-19 pandemic. Necessary plans are recommended to reduce the fatigue and anxiety of nurses and prevent their burnout, particularly in critical situations. Efforts to identify risky areas, setting up reporting systems and error reduction strategies can help to develop preventive medicine. On the other hand, since the quality of people's lives is considered the standard of countries' superiority, by clarifying medical errors, a higher level of health, satisfaction and safety of patients will be provided.

Understanding complexity in a safety critical setting: A systems approach to medication administration

'Medication errors' are a significant concern and are associated with a higher incidence of adverse events and unintentional patient harm than any other aspect of healthcare. While much research has focused on adverse medication errors, limited studies have specifically examined 'normal' medication delivery performance and the interactions between tasks, agents, and information within the medication administration system. This article describes a study that applied the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork (EAST) model to study the hospital medication administration system to identify opportunities to optimise performance and patient safety. Key findings of this study demonstrate that this is a highly complex system, comprising many social agents and a relatively closely linked series of tasks and information. However, most of the workload relies on a small proportion of healthcare professionals. Significantly, the patient has a minimal role in the medication administration system during their hospital stay. The research has shown that this approach enables mapping networks and their interdependencies to optimise the system as a whole rather than its parts in isolation.

Correlation of safety behavior, handover quality, and risk perception: A cross-sectional study among Chinese psychiatric nurses

Background

Nurses' safety behaviors played an important role in patients' safety goal realization, and it varies from person to person. However, less research has explored the safety behavior level of psychiatric nurses and its influencing factors. Thus, this research aimed to assess the level of safety behavior and explore whether risk perception mediated the relationship between handover quality and safety behavior among psychiatric nurses.

Methods

A total of 186 registered psychiatric nurses in a Chinese hospital were recruited for this study, through the convenience sampling method. Handover quality, risk perception, and safety behavior were measured. Hayes' PROCESS macro was used to evaluate the mediation of risk perception between handover quality and safety behavior.

Results

Scores of psychiatric nurses' safety behaviors were (47.98 ± 7.45), and handover quality and risk perception could predict the variance of nurses' safety behaviors. Risk perception could partially mediate between handover quality and nurses' safety behaviors, and the value of the mediating effect was 49.17%.

Conclusion

Psychiatric nurses' safety behaviors have a large promotion space. Therefore, healthcare professionals should endeavor to improve the handover quality of psychiatric nurses and decrease their risk perception, thereby promoting nurses' safety behaviors.

Intercepting Medication Errors in Pediatric In-patients Using a Prescription Pre-audit Intelligent Decision System: A Single-center Study

OBJECTIVES

Medication errors can happen at any phase of the medication process at health care settings. The objective of this study is to identify the characteristics of severe prescribing errors at a pediatric hospital in the inpatient setting and to provide recommendations to improve medication safety and rational drug use.

METHODS

This descriptive retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary pediatric hospital using data collected from Jan. 1st, 2019 to Dec. 31st, 2020. During this period, the Prescription Pre-audit Intelligent Decision System was implemented. Medication orders with potential severe errors would trigger a Level 7 alert and would be intercepted before it reached the pharmacy. Trained pharmacists maintained the system and facilitated decision making when necessary. For each order intercepted by the system the following patient details were recorded and analyzed: patient age, patient's department, drug classification, dosage forms, route of administration, and the type of error.

RESULTS

A total of 2176 Level 7 medication orders were intercepted. The most common errors were associated with drug dosage, administration route, and dose frequency, accounting for 35.2%, 32.8% and 13.2%, respectively. Of all the intercepted oerrors. 53.6% occurred in infants aged < 1 year. Administration routes involved were mainly intravenous, oral and external use drugs. Most alerts came from the neonatology department and constituted 40.5% of the total alerts, followed by the nephrology department 15.9% and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) 11.3%. As to dosage forms, injections accounted for 50.4% of alerts, with 21.3% attributable to topical solutions, 9.1% to tablets, and 5.7% to inhalation. Anti-infective agents were the most common therapeutic drugs prescribed with errors.

CONCLUSIONS

The Prescription Pre-audit Intelligent Decision System, with the supervision of trained pharmacists can validate prescriptions, increase prescription accuracy, and improve drug safety for hospitalized children. It is a medical service model worthy of consideration.

Exploring Nurses' Attitudes, Skills, and Beliefs of Medication Safety Practices

BACKGROUND

Medication errors exist within health care systems despite efforts to reduce their incidence. These errors may result in patient harm including morbidity, mortality, and increased health care costs.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore direct care nurses' attitudes, skills, and beliefs about medication safety practice.

METHODS

Researchers conducted a descriptive exploratory study using the Nurses' Attitudes and Skills around Updated Safety Concepts (NASUS) scale and the Nurse Beliefs about Errors Questionnaire (NBEQ).

RESULTS

Responses from 191 surveys were analyzed. Of the participants, 70% were bachelor's prepared registered nurses and 88% were female. Results of the NASUS scale revealed the median of means of the Perceived Skills subscale was 79.2 out of 100 and the Attitudes subscale was 65.8 out of 100. The mean of the belief questions related to severity of error was 7.66 out of 10; most participants agreed with reporting of severe errors, reporting errors with moderate or major adverse events, and reporting of incorrect intravenous fluids.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding direct care nurses' attitudes, skills, and beliefs about medication safety practices provides a foundation for development of improvement strategies.

Exploration of an Alarm Sensor to Detect Infusion Failure Administered by Syringe Pumps

Incorrect medication administration causes millions of undesirable complications worldwide every year. The problem is severe and there are many control systems in the market, yet the exact molecular composition of the solution is not monitored. Here, we propose an alarm sensor based on UV-Vis spectroscopy and refractometry. Both methods are non-invasive and non-destructive as they utilize visible light for the analysis. Moreover, they can be used for on-site or point-of-care diagnosis. UV-Vis-spectrometer detect the absorption of light caused by an electronic transition in an atom or molecule. In contrast a refractometer measures the extent of light refraction as part of a refractive index of transparent substances. Both methods can be used for quantification of dissolved analytes in transparent substances. We show that a sensor combining both methods is capable to discern most standard medications that are used in intensive care medicine. Furthermore, an integration of the alarm sensor in already existing monitoring systems is possible.

Improving patient safety through identifying barriers to reporting medication administration errors among nurses: an integrative review

BACKGROUND

The aim of the third WHO challenge released in 2017 was to attain a global commitment to lessen the severity and to prevent medication-related harm by 50% within the next five years. To achieve this goal, comprehensive identification of barriers to reporting medication errors is imperative.

OBJECTIVE

This review systematically identified and examined the barriers hindering nurses from reporting medication administration errors in the hospital setting.

DESIGN

An integrative review.

REVIEW METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) including Google scholar were searched to identify published studies on barriers to medication administration error reporting from January 2016 to December 2020. Two reviewers (AA, and KDK) independently assessed the quality of all the included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018.

RESULTS

Of the 10, 929 articles retrieved, 14 studies were included in this study. The main themes and subthemes identified as barriers to reporting medication administration errors after the integration of results from qualitative and quantitative studies were: organisational barriers (inadequate reporting systems, management behaviour, and unclear definition of medication error), and professional and individual barriers (fear of management/colleagues/lawsuit, individual reasons, and inadequate knowledge of errors).

CONCLUSION

Providing an enabling environment void of punitive measures and blame culture is imperious for nurses to report medication administration errors. Policymakers, managers, and nurses should agree on a uniform definition of what constitutes medication error to enhance nurses' ability to report medication administration errors.

Nurses' experiences in voluntary error reporting: An integrative literature review

OBJECTIVE

This integrative review aimed to examine and understand nurses' experiences of voluntary error reporting (VER) and elucidate factors underlying their decision to engage in VER.

METHOD

This is an integrative review based on Whittemore & Knafl five-stage framework. A systematic search guided by the PRISMA 2020 approach was performed on four electronic databases: CINAHL, Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Embase. Peer-reviewed articles published in the English language from January 2010 to December 2020 were retrieved and screened for relevancy.

RESULTS

Totally 31 papers were included in this review following the quality appraisal. A constant comparative approach was used to synthesize findings of eligible studies to report nurses' experiences of VER represented by three major themes: nurses' beliefs, behavior, and sentiments towards VER; nurses' perceived enabling factors of VER and nurses' perceived inhibiting factors of VER. Findings of this review revealed that nurses' experiences of VER were less than ideal. Firstly, these negative experiences were accounted for by the interplays of factors that influenced their attitudes, perceptions, emotions, and practices. Additionally, their negative experiences were underpinned by a spectrum of system, administrative and organizational factors that focuses on attributing the error to human failure characterized by an unsupportive, blaming, and punitive approach to error management.

CONCLUSION

Findings of this review add to the body of knowledge to inform on the areas of focus to guide nursing management perspectives to strengthen institutional efforts to improve nurses' recognition, reception, and contribution towards VER. It is recommended that nursing leaders prioritize and invest in strategies to enhance existing institutional error management approaches to establish a just and open patient safety culture that would promote positivity in nurses' overall experiences towards VER.

Nurses' Decisions in Error Reporting and Disclosing Based on Error Scenarios: A Mixed-method Study

Background: It is ensured that nurses’ error reporting and disclosing improve services to patients and are considered a movement toward creating a culture of transparency in the healthcare system. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the nurses' decisions on reporting and disclosing Medical Errors (MEs). Methods: This research followed a mixed-method embedded design that was performed in five hospitals in Iran in 2018. A total of 491 nurses participated in the quantitative phase of the study with stratified sampling, followed by a simple random sampling technique. Also, 22 nurses joined the qualitative phase. Data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire and semi-structured interviews through a scenario-based method. Quantitative data analysis was performed using descriptive and analytical statistics by SPSS 21.0 and Expert Choice 10.0 software. The qualitative data were analyzed based on the content analysis approach. Results: The most important perceived barriers with the highest impact coincided with educational (57.17%) and motivational (56.77%) factors based on SEM analysis (ES: 1.33, SE: 0.16). Regression analysis showed that error-reporting mechanisms, educational factors, and reporting consequences were significantly associated with age, sex, and work experience (P-Value ≤0.05). Error scenarios were thematized into three categories: Error perception (including ambiguity and weakness in error definition, the severity of the error, unawareness of guidelines, deviation from standards, and untrained staff), error reporting (including ineffective reporting system, hesitation in reporting to a formal system, increased workload, improper reaction, punitive responses, and concerns about consequences), and error disclosure (including no disclosure, partial disclosure, and full disclosure). Conclusions: The obtained results contributed to a better understanding of the barriers to error reporting and disclosing. In addition, these results can help hospitals encourage error reporting and ultimately make organizational changes, which reduce the incidence of errors.

Factors causing medication errors in an electronic reporting system

Aim

To analyse medication error data from a hospital's electronic reporting system and identify the factors affecting error types and harmfulness.

Design

A retrospective study.

Methods

The 805 near misses and adverse events reported to the hospital's electronic reporting system between January 2014 and December 2018 were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi‐square tests and logistic regression analyses.

Results

A total of 632 near misses and 173 adverse events were reported. Near misses and adverse events were the most common error type during the dispensing stage and medication administration, respectively. The odds of medication errors reported by nurses with 1–9 years of clinical experience were relatively low. After adjusting for confounders, the odds of medication errors directly observed by nurses were 65% lower than the odds of medication errors not directly detected. In clinical practice, nurses must be educated about errors in reporting depending on their degree of clinical experience.

Interdisciplinary differences in patient safety culture within a teaching hospital in Southeast Asia

BACKGROUND

Patient safety represents a global issue which leads to potentially avoidable morbidity and mortality. The healthcare providers perception and their role are utmost important in delivering quality care and patient safety. This study aimed to determine the interdisciplinary differences in patient safety culture in a tertiary university hospital.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study using the Safety Attitude Questionnaire (SAQ) self-administered electronically in the English and Malay languages to evaluate safety culture domains. A positive percentage agreement scores of 60% was considered satisfactory. Comparisons were made between doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, nursing assistants and support staff.

RESULTS

Of 6562 respondents, 5724 (80.4%) completed the questionnaire; 3930 (74.5%) women, 2263 (42.9%) nurses, and 1812 (34.2%) had 6-10 years of working experience. The mean overall positive percentage agreement scores were 66.2 (range = 31.1 to 84.7%), with job satisfaction (72.3% ± 21.9%) and stress recognition (58.3 ± 25.6%) representing the highest and lowest mean domain scores, respectively. Differences were observed between all five job categories. Linear regression analyses revealed that the other four job categories scored lower in teamwork, safety climate, job satisfaction and working conditions compared to nurses.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall mean SAQ score was above the satisfactory level, with unsatisfactory percentage agreement scores in the stress recognition domain. Interventions to improve patient safety culture should be developed, focusing on stress management.

Common Barriers to Reporting Medical Errors

BACKGROUND

Medical errors are the third leading cause of death in the United States. Reporting of all medical errors is important to better understand the problem and to implement solutions based on root causes. Underreporting of medical errors is a common and a challenging obstacle in the fight for patient safety. The goal of this study is to review common barriers to reporting medical errors.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the literature by searching the MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases for studies on barriers to reporting medical errors. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guideline was followed in selecting eligible studies.

RESULTS

Thirty studies were included in the final review, 8 of which were from the United States. The majority of the studies used self-administered questionnaires (75%) to collect data. Nurses were the most studied providers (87%), followed by physicians (27%). Fear of consequences is the most reported barrier (63%), followed by lack of feedback (27%) and work climate/culture (27%). Barriers to reporting were highly variable between different centers.

Barriers to Incident Reporting among Nurses: A Qualitative Systematic Review

Incident reporting in health care prevents error recurrence, ultimately improving patient safety. A qualitative systematic review was conducted, aiming to identify barriers to incident reporting among nurses. Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for qualitative systematic reviews was followed, with data extracted using JBI QARI tools, and selected studies assessed for methodological quality using Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). A meta-aggregation synthesis was carried out, and confidence in findings was assessed using GRADE ConQual. A total of 921 records were identified, but only five studies were included. The overall methodological quality of these studies was good and GRADE ConQual assessment score was "moderate." Fear of negative consequences was the most cited barrier to nursing incident reporting. Barriers also included inadequate incident reporting systems and lack of interdisciplinary and interdepartmental cooperation. Lack of nurses' necessary training made it more difficult to understand the importance of incident reporting and the definition of error. Lack of effective feedback and motivation and a pervasive blame culture were also identified.

Medication errors: a focus on nursing practice

Objectives

Health departments endeavor to give care to individuals to remain in healthy conditions. Medications errors (MEs), one of the most types of medical errors, could be venomous in clinical settings. Patients will be harmed physically and psychologically, in addition to adverse economic consequences. Reviewing and understanding the topic of medication error especially by nurses can help in advancing the medical services to patients.

Methods

A search using search engines such as PubMed and Google scholar were used in finding articles related to the review topic.

Key findings

This review highlighted the classifications of MEs, their types, outcomes, reporting process, and the strategies of error avoidance. This summary can bridge and open gates of awareness on how to deal with and prevent error occurrences. It highlights the importance of reporting strategies as mainstay prevention methods for medication errors.

Conclusions

Medication errors are classified based on multifaceted criteria and there is a need to standardize the recommendations and make them a central goal all over the globe for the best practice. Nurses are the frontlines of clinical settings, encouraged to be one integrated body to prevent the occurrence of medication errors. Thus, systemizing the guidelines are required such as education and training, independent double checks, standardized procedures, follow the five rights, documentation, keep lines of communication open, inform patients of drug they receive, follow strict guidelines, improve labeling and package format, focus on the work environment, reduce workload, ways to avoid distraction, fix the faulty system, enhancing job security for nurses, create a cultural blame-free workspace, as well as hospital administration, should support and revise processes of error reporting, and spread the awareness of the importance of reporting.

PRN Medicines Optimization and Nurse Education

Medicines management is a high-risk and error prone process in healthcare settings, where nurses play an important role to preserve patient safety. In order to create a safe healthcare environment, nurses should recognize challenges that they face in this process, understand factors leading to medication errors, identify errors and systematically address them to prevent their future occurrence. ''Pro re nata'' (PRN, as needed) medicine administration is a relatively neglected area of medicines management in nursing practice, yet has a high potential for medication errors. Currently, the international literature indicates a lack of knowledge of both the competencies required for PRN medicines management and the optimum educational strategies to prepare students for PRN medicines management. To address this deficiency in the literature, the authors have presented a discussion on nurses' roles in medication safety and the significance and purpose of PRN medications, and suggest a model for preparing nursing students in safe PRN medicines management. The discussion takes into account patient participation and nurse competencies required to safeguard PRN medication practice, providing a background for further research on how to improve the safety of PRN medicines management in clinical practice.

Medication errors and drug knowledge gaps among critical-care nurses: a mixed multi-method study

BACKGROUND

Medication errors are a serious and complex problem in clinical practice, especially in intensive care units whose patients can suffer potentially very serious consequences because of the critical nature of their diseases and the pharmacotherapy programs implemented in these patients. The origins of these errors discussed in the literature are wide-ranging, although far-reaching variables are of particular special interest to those involved in training nurses. The main objective of this research was to study if the level of knowledge that critical-care nurses have about the use and administration of medications is related to the most common medication errors.

METHODS

This was a mixed (multi-method) study with three phases that combined quantitative and qualitative techniques. In phase 1 patient medical records were reviewed; phase 2 consisted of an interview with a focus group; and an ad hoc questionnaire was carried out in phase 3.

RESULTS

The global medication error index was 1.93%. The main risk areas were errors in the interval of administration of antibiotics (8.15% error rate); high-risk medication dilution, concentration, and infusion-rate errors (2.94% error rate); and errors in the administration of medications via nasogastric tubes (11.16% error rate).

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses have a low level of knowledge of the drugs they use the most and with which a greater number of medication errors are committed in the ICU.