A mortality risk score for heart transplants after contemporary ventricular assist device bridging

The HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device as a strategy to bridge to transplant

PURPOSE

Recent changes in the market for left ventricular assist devices have resulted in the HeartMate 3 (HM3) being the only commercially-available device. This study evaluates the outcomes of patients with a HM3 waitlisted for and undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT).

METHODS

Patients waitlisted for isolated OHT with a HM3 or undergoing OHT after bridge-to-transplant (BTT) with a HM3 between 2015 and 2021 were identified from the UNOS registry and included in this study. Propensity matching was used to compare outcomes of BTT-HM3 versus primary OHT.

RESULTS

A total of 1321 patients supported with a HM3 underwent OHT during our study period. Unadjusted 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year survival following OHT in the BTT-HM3 cohort was 96.5%, 94.4%, and 90.7%, respectively. In propensity-matched analysis, 1103 BTT-HM3 patients were compared with 1103 primary OHT patients. Rates of post-OHT stroke were higher in the BTT-HM3 group (4.4% vs. 2.0%, p = .001). The BTT-HM3 group had lower 30-day survival (96.2% vs. 97.4%, p = .033) although 90-day (94.2% vs. 95.3%, p = .103) and 1-year survival (90.4% vs. 91.7%, p = .216) were comparable. A total of 1251 patients were supported with a HM3 at the time of OHT listing during the study period. At the time of this analysis, 60 (4.5%) remained on the waitlist, 991 (75.0%) underwent OHT, and 119 (9.0%) died or clinically deteriorated with waitlist removal.

CONCLUSIONS

The HM3 is a viable method for BTT with acceptable waitlist outcomes. Although 1-year survival is comparable to primary OHT, early outcomes are worse, suggesting that refinement of patient selection and perioperative management is prudent to optimizing outcomes.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with severe respiratory failure from COVID-19

PURPOSE

Limited data are available on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

METHODS

We examined the clinical features and outcomes of 190 patients treated with ECMO within 14 days of ICU admission, using data from a multicenter cohort study of 5122 critically ill adults with COVID-19 admitted to 68 hospitals across the United States. To estimate the effect of ECMO on mortality, we emulated a target trial of ECMO receipt versus no ECMO receipt within 7 days of ICU admission among mechanically ventilated patients with severe hypoxemia (PaO₂/FiO₂ < 100). Patients were followed until hospital discharge, death, or a minimum of 60 days. We adjusted for confounding using a multivariable Cox model.

RESULTS

Among the 190 patients treated with ECMO, the median age was 49 years (IQR 41-58), 137 (72.1%) were men, and the median PaO₂/FiO₂ prior to ECMO initiation was 72 (IQR 61-90). At 60 days, 63 patients (33.2%) had died, 94 (49.5%) were discharged, and 33 (17.4%) remained hospitalized. Among the 1297 patients eligible for the target trial emulation, 45 of the 130 (34.6%) who received ECMO died, and 553 of the 1167 (47.4%) who did not receive ECMO died. In the primary analysis, patients who received ECMO had lower mortality than those who did not (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.41-0.74). Results were similar in a secondary analysis limited to patients with PaO₂/FiO₂ < 80 (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.40-0.77).

CONCLUSION

In select patients with severe respiratory failure from COVID-19, ECMO may reduce mortality.