Incidence of large for gestational age infants when gestational diabetes mellitus is diagnosed early and late in pregnancy

Large for Gestational Age and Adverse Outcomes: Stratified By Diabetes Status

OBJECTIVE

 To examine the association of adverse outcomes among parturients with large for gestational age (LGA; birth weight ≥ 90th) newborns, stratified by diabetes status. Additionally, we described the temporal trends of adverse outcomes among LGA neonates.

STUDY DESIGN

 This retrospective cohort study used the U.S. Vital Statistics dataset between 2014 and 2020. The inclusion criteria were singleton, nonanomalous LGA live births who labored and delivered at 24 to 41 weeks with known diabetes status. The coprimary outcomes were composite neonatal adverse outcomes of the following: Apgar score < 5 at 5 minutes, assisted ventilation > 6 hours, seizure, or neonatal or infant mortality, and maternal adverse outcomes of the following: maternal transfusion, ruptured uterus, unplanned hysterectomy, admission to intensive care unit, or unplanned procedure. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to estimate adjusted relative risks (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Average annual percent change (AAPC) was calculated to assess changes in rates of LGA and morbidity over time.

RESULTS

 Of 27 million births in 7 years, 1,843,467 (6.8%) met the inclusion criteria. While 1,656,888 (89.9%) did not have diabetes, 186,579 (10.1%) were with diabetes. Composite neonatal adverse outcomes (aRR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.43, 1.52) and composite maternal adverse outcomes (aRR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.36, 1.38) were significantly higher among individuals with diabetes, compared with those without diabetes. From 2014 to 2020, the LGA rate was stable among people without diabetes. However, there was a downward trend of LGA in people with diabetes (AAPC = - 2.4, 95% CI = - 3.5, -1.4).

CONCLUSION

 In pregnancies with LGA newborns, composite neonatal and maternal morbidities were higher in those with diabetes, compared with those without diabetes.

KEY POINTS

· Large for gestational age stratified by diabetes status.. · Composite neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes are worse among individuals with diabetes as compared to those without.. · During 2014 to 2020, the trend of LGA in individuals without diabetes increased..

Risk factors of late-onset gestational diabetes diagnosed during 24-28 weeks of gestation after normal early screening: a case-control study

Objective

To determine the risk factors associated with late-onset GDM (diagnosed between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation) after normal early screening.

Methods

A case-control study was conducted in 600 singleton pregnant women who started antenatal care before 20 weeks with normal early GDM screening. Repeat screening was performed at 24-28 weeks. Cases were 120 women with late-onset GDM and 480 controls were those without GDM. Risk factors for late-onset GDM were evaluated and pregnancy outcomes were compared.

Results

Cases were significantly older, and more likely to be overweight or obese. 50-g GCT of ≥ 160 mg/dL and abnormal 1 value of 100-g OGTT significantly increased the risk of late-onset GDM (p = 0.004 and < 0.001 respectively). Independent risk factors were abnormal 1 value of 100-g OGTT from first screening (adjusted OR 5.49, 95% CI 2.70-11.17, p < 0.001), age ≥ 30 years (adjusted OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.66-4.43, p < 0.001), DM in family (adjusted OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.07-2.88, p = 0.025), and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (adjusted OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.17-2.97, p = 0.009). Late-onset GDM significantly increased the risk of preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, LGA, and macrosomia.

Conclusion

Independent factors associated with late-onset GDM included abnormal 1 value of 100-g OGTT from first screening, age ≥ 30 years, DM in family, and being overweight or obese.

The Effect of Timing and Methods for the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Obstetric Complications

Aim. To compare the impact of the time and method of diagnosis on gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in women who gave birth at the Hospital of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LUHS) Kauno klinikos. Methods. A retrospective study was performed using data from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the LUHS Birth Registry to analyze the data of women who gave birth and had GDM in 2020-2021. The subjects were divided based on the type of diagnosis: GDM was diagnosed either at the first antenatal visit when fasting plasma glycemia (FPG) was ≥5.1 mmol/L (early diagnosis group) or after OGTT at 24 + 0 - 28 + 6 weeks of gestation when at least one pathological glycemic index was observed: fasting glycemia 5.1-6.9 mmol/L or 1-h glycemia ≥10.0 mmol/L or 2 h glycemia 8.5-11.0 mmol/L (late diagnosis group). The results were processed using IBM SPSS. Results. The early diagnosis group had 1254 (65.7%) women, the late diagnosis group had 654 (34.3%). More primigravida women were in the late diagnosis group (p = 0.017) while more multigravida were in the early diagnosis group (p = 0.033). The early diagnosis group had more obese women (p = 0.001), including those with a BMI > 40 (p = 0.001). In the early diagnosis group, GDM was more frequently diagnosed in women who gained <11 kg (p = 0.005), while in the late diagnosis group->16 kg (p = 0.001). FPG was higher in the early diagnosis group (p = 0.001). Glycemia was more commonly corrected with lifestyle changes in the late diagnosis group (p = 0.001), and with additional insulin therapy in the early diagnosis group (p = 0.001). Polyhydramnios and preeclampsia were more common in the late diagnosis group (p = 0.027 and p = 0.009). There were more large-for-gestational-age neonates in the late diagnosis group (p = 0.005). Macrosomia was more common in the late diagnosis group (p = 0.008). Conclusions. GDM is more commonly diagnosed with OGTT in primigravida women. Higher pregestational weight and BMI has an impact on the early diagnosis of GDM and need for insulin therapy with lifestyle changes. Late diagnosis of GDM is connected with obstetric complications.

Early universal screening of gestational diabetes in a university hospital in Thailand

A total of 1016 pregnant women attending antenatal clinic before 20 weeks of gestation during September 2018 to February 2019 were included in a cohort study with repeated cross-sectional assessments. The study was aimed to determine prevalence and characteristics of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and pregnancy outcomes by early universal screening approach. GDM screening was performed during first visit and repeated during 24-28 weeks of gestation, as necessary, using a 50-g glucose challenge test followed by a 100-g oral glucose tolerance test for GDM diagnosis. Overall prevalence of GDM was 18.6%. A significantly higher prevalence of GDM was observed among high-risk than low-risk women (21.3% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.002). GDM among low-risk women contributed to 23.3% of all GDM cases. The majority of GDM (76.2%) were diagnosed before 20 weeks of gestation, with 74.5% occurring in high-risk women and 81.8% occurring in low-risk women. When initial screening tests were normal, risk of GDM diagnosed during 24-28 weeks was 6.0% (7.5% among high-risk women and 3.1% among low-risk women). Compared to those without GDM, women with GDM significantly had lower gestational weight gain (p < 0.001), higher prevalence of preeclampsia (p = 0.001), large for gestational age (LGA) (p = 0.034) and macrosomia (p = 0.004). These outcomes were more pronounced among high-risk women with GDM. Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Universal GDM screening is recommended during 24-28 weeks of gestation, either by 1- or 2-step approach. Some also recommend early GDM screening among high-risk women. Prevalence of early-onset GDM varies between studies and benefits of early diagnosis and treatment are still controversial.What do the results of this study add? Early universal GDM screening identified more women with GDM and majority could be diagnosed before 20 weeks of gestation. GDM among low-risk women contributed to 23.3% of all cases. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were more common among high-risk women with GDM. This approach could be useful and can be implemented in other settings, especially those that serve high-risk population or with high GDM prevalence.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Early universal GDM screening should be considered in settings with high prevalence of GDM and high-risk women. However, benefits of early detection and treatment of GDM should be determined in more details in the future, especially in terms of cost-effectiveness and improvement in pregnancy outcomes.

Global burden of early pregnancy gestational diabetes mellitus (eGDM): A systematic review

AIMS

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosed during the first trimester of pregnancy is called 'early pregnancy Gestational Diabetes Mellitus' (eGDM). The burden of eGDM has only been studied sporadically. This review aims to understand the global burden of eGDM in terms of prevalence, risk factors, pregnancy outcomes, treatment and postpartum dysglycemia.  METHODS: A review of epidemiologic studies reporting on early GDM screening as per Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for prevalence reviews was conducted. A customized search strategy was used to search electronic databases namely, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, MEDLINE, Ovid, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Three independent reviewers reviewed studies using Covidence software. Observational studies irrespective of study design and regardless of diagnostic criteria were included. Quality of evidence was appraised, and findings were synthesized.

RESULTS

Of 58 included studies, 41 reported a prevalence of eGDM, ranging from 0.7 to 36.8%. Body mass index (BMI), previous history of GDM, family history of diabetes and multiparity were reported as eGDM risk factors. Adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with eGDM were macrosomia, caesarean delivery, induction of labour, hypertension, preterm delivery, and shoulder dystocia. The incidence of postpartum dysglycemia and the need for insulin was higher in women with eGDM. The risk of bias was moderate. Heterogeneity of studies is a limitation. Meta-analysis was not performed.

CONCLUSIONS

There is heterogeneity in the prevalence of eGDM and intrapartum and postpartum ill effects for the mother and the offspring. There is a need to develop a universal screening protocol for eGDM.

A first trimester prediction model for large for gestational age infants: a preliminary study

Background

Large for gestational age infants (LGA) have increased risk of adverse short-term perinatal outcomes. This study aims to develop a multivariable prediction model for the risk of giving birth to a LGA baby, by using biochemical, biophysical, anamnestic, and clinical maternal characteristics available at first trimester.

Methods

Prospective study that included all singleton pregnancies attending the first trimester aneuploidy screening at the Obstetric Unit of the University Hospital of Modena, in Northern Italy, between June 2018 and December 2019.

Results

A total of 503 consecutive women were included in the analysis. The final prediction model for LGA, included multiparity (OR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.6–4.9, p = 0.001), pre-pregnancy BMI (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03–1.14, p = 0.002) and PAPP-A MoM (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.08–1.90, p = 0.013). The area under the ROC curve was 70.5%, indicating a satisfactory predictive accuracy. The best predictive cut-off for this score was equal to − 1.378, which corresponds to a 20.1% probability of having a LGA infant. By using such a cut-off, the risk of LGA can be predicted in our sample with sensitivity of 55.2% and specificity of 79.0%.

Conclusion

At first trimester, a model including multiparity, pre-pregnancy BMI and PAPP-A satisfactorily predicted the risk of giving birth to a LGA infant. This promising tool, once applied early in pregnancy, would identify women deserving targeted interventions.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04838431, 09/04/2021.

Early Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Diagnostic Strategies and Clinical Implications

Preexisting diabetes mellitus (DM) should be ruled out early in pregnancy in those at risk. During screening, a significant proportion of women do not reach the threshold for overt DM but fulfill the criteria used for diagnosing conventional gestational DM (cGDM). There is no consensus on the management of pregnancies with intermediate levels of hyperglycemia thus diagnosed. We have used the term early gestational DM (eGDM) for this condition and reviewed the currently available literature. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), oral glucose tolerance test, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) are the commonly employed screening tools in early pregnancy. Observational studies suggest that early pregnancy FPG and Hba1c correlate with the risk of cGDM and adverse perinatal outcomes. However, specific cut-offs, including those proposed by the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group, do not reliably predict the development of cGDM. Emerging data, though indicate that FPG ≥ 92 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L), even in the absence of cGDM, signals the risk for perinatal complication. Elevated HbA1c, especially a level ≥ 5.9%, also correlates with the risk of cGDM and worsened outcome. HbA1c as a diagnostic test is however besieged with the usual caveats that occur in pregnancy. The studies that explored the effects of intervention present conflicting results, including a possibility of fetal malnutrition and small-for-date baby in the early treatment group. Diagnostic thresholds and glycemic targets in eGDM may differ, and large multicenter randomized controlled trials are necessary to define the appropriate strategy.

Mild periconceptional hyperglycemia: predictor of adverse fetomaternal outcomes in gestational diabetes?

AIM

To clarify whether mild first trimester hyperglycaemia (characteristic of early-onset GDM) is associated with higher incidence of congenital malformations and other adverse fetomaternal outcomes compared to women with second trimester hyperglycaemia (later-onset GDM).

DESIGN AND METHODS

We analyzed the Portuguese National GDM database, containing data collected between 2011 and 2017. Two study groups were defined: Group 1-Women with GDM diagnosed during the first trimester (with fasting glycemia ≥ 92 and < 126 mg/dL); Group 2-Women with GDM diagnosed after the first 12 weeks of gestation, with either fasting glycemia or oral glucose tolerance test, according to the International Association of Pregnancy and Diabetes Study Group criteria. The fetomaternal characteristics of each group were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 18.518 pregnant women diagnosed with GDM were included which 34.4% of them belonged to Group 1. Pregnant women from this group were significantly younger and had a higher median BMI than the women from the other group. Overall, there was no significant differences in maternal morbidity parameters between groups. Non-evolutive pregnancies were significantly more frequent along the present gestation in the group 1 (1.1% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001), as was fetal death (0.6% vs. 0.2%, p < 0.001). Congenital malformations did not differ significantly between groups (3.2% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.155).

CONCLUSIONS

The mild near conceptional hyperglycaemic state characteristic of an early-onset GDM seems to be associated with an increased prevalence of non-evolutive pregnancies and foetal deaths when compared to later-onset GDM.

Early Versus Routine Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Women With Intermediate Hyperglycemia at First Prenatal Visit: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Intermediate hyperglycemia in the first half of pregnancy, defined as a fasting plasma glucose level between 5.1- 6.9 mM, increases the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus, but clinical evidence for further management is lacking. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of an early oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) followed by the identification of intermediate hyperglycemia on pregnancy outcomes in real world setting.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Shanghai, China, between 2013 and 2017. Women with intermediate hyperglycemia at the first prenatal visit were identified and underwent an immediate (within one week) or a routine OGTT (24-28 gw) according to their wishes and received nutrition and exercise advice. Women diagnosed of gestational diabetes (GDM) were managed by standard interventions. Primary outcome was larger for gestational age (LGA). Secondary outcomes were primary cesarean delivery, preterm birth, shoulder dystocia or forceps delivery, preeclampsia, neonatal hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, and low Apgar score. Logistic regressions with or without a further propensity score-matched analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Among 42406 women involved, 1104 (2.6%) with intermediate hyperglycemia at the first prenatal visit were identified, of whom 176 (15.9%) underwent an early OGTT and 741 (67.1%) received a routine OGTT. Logistic regression showed that an early OGTT was not significantly associated with an altered risk of LGA (adjusted OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.73-1.75) but was related to an increased odds for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (adjusted OR 2.89; 95% CI 1.55-5.37). No significant associations were observed for other secondary outcomes. These trends remained consistent in propensity score-matched models.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data from a real-world setting did not support that an early OGTT among women with intermediate hyperglycemia at the first prenatal visit improved pregnancy outcomes.

Prevalence of early-onset GDM and associated risk factors in a university hospital in Thailand

This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine prevalence of GDM diagnosed before 24 weeks of gestation (early-onset GDM) and evaluate associated risk factors and compare pregnancy outcomes between different GDM status. A total of 1200 pregnant women attending antenatal clinic before 24 weeks of gestation were included. GDM screening was offered during first visit and repeat during 24-28 weeks of gestation, using 50-g GCT and 100-g OGTT. GDM was diagnosed in 110 women (13.9%) and early-onset GDM was found in 57 women (9.2%), which accounted for 65.9% of all GDM. Early-onset GDM had significant lower gestational weight gain and higher rates of preeclampsia, LGA infants, and NICU admission. Independent associated factors for early-onset GDM were age ≥30 years (aOR 4.89, 95%CI: 2.08-11.50, p < .001), and previous GDM (aOR 12.26, 95%CI: 3.86-38.93, p < .001) while DM in family was the only independent factor for late-onset GDM (aOR 2.53, 95%CI: 1.42-4.51, p = .002).IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Reported prevalence of early-onset GDM varies between studies, depending on the screening strategy and criteria used. Despite treatment, early-onset GDM has been associated with increased adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in many previous studies. The risks associated with early-onset GDM and the evidence for benefit of early treatment are still unclear.What do the results of this study add? The results showed that early-onset GDM accounted for majority (65.9%) of all GDM. Despite treatment, early-onset GDM increased risk of preeclampsia, LGA infants, and NICU admission. Independent associated factors for early-onset GDM were age ≥30 years, and previous GDM while DM in family was the only independent factor for late-onset GDM.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Early GDM screening and intensive management, especially in high-risk women, should be implemented to minimise the risks of adverse outcomes. Further studies are needed to determine appropriate criteria to define early-onset GDM and to identify women at higher risk in different population and settings with different screening strategies. Effective management and approaches for this subgroup of GDM should also be further investigated.

Prognosis associated with initial care of increased fasting glucose in early pregnancy: A retrospective study

AIM

To evaluate whether the initial care of women with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels at 5.1-6.9mmol/L before 22 weeks of gestation (WG), termed 'early fasting hyperglycaemia', is associated with fewer adverse outcomes than no initial care.

METHODS

A total of 523 women with early fasting hyperglycaemia were retrospectively selected in our department (2012-2016) and separated into two groups: (i) those who received immediate care (n=255); and (ii) those who did not (n=268), but had an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at or after 22 WG, with subsequent standard care if hyperglycaemia (by WHO criteria) was present. The number of cases of large-for-gestational age (LGA) infants, shoulder dystocia and preeclampsia with initial care of early fasting hyperglycaemia were compared after propensity score modelling and accounting for covariates.

RESULTS

Of the 268 women with no initial care, 134 had hyperglycaemia after 22 WG and then received care. Women who received initial care vs those who did not were more likely to be insulin-treated during pregnancy (58.0% vs 20.9%, respectively; P<0.00001), gained less gestational weight (8.6±5.4kg vs 10.8±6.1kg, respectively; P<0.00001), had a lower rate of preeclampsia [1.2% vs 2.6%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.247 (0.082-0.759), P=0.01], and similar rates of LGA infants (12.2% vs 11.9%, respectively) and shoulder dystocia (1.6% vs 1.5%, respectively). When initial FPG levels were ≥5.5mmol/L (prespecified group, n=137), there was a lower rate of LGA infants [6.7% vs 16.1%, respectively; aOR: 0.332 (0.122-0.898); P=0.03].

CONCLUSION

Treating women with early fasting hyperglycaemia, especially when FPG is ≥5.5mmol/L, may improve pregnancy outcomes, although this now needs to be confirmed by randomized clinical trials.

Sonographic and other nonglycemic factors can predict large-for-gestational-age infants in diet-managed gestational diabetes mellitus: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common complications of pregnancy. Left untreated or poorly controlled, GDM results in adverse infant outcomes such as large for gestational age (LGA). This study aims to identify nonglycemic maternal and fetal factors predictive of LGA outcomes in pregnancies complicated by diet-managed GDM.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies complicated by diet-managed GDM from 2004 to 2015. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed on maternal and perinatal factors to identify risk factors for LGA. In addition, a subset univariate analysis was conducted for pregnancies in which fetal ultrasound abdominal circumference measurements were available at gestational weeks 18 to 22, 24 to 28, and 29 to 33.

RESULTS

A total of 1064 women were included, delivering 123 LGA infants. Women with higher parity (odds ratio [OR] 1.44; CI, 1.23-1.68; P < .001) and higher prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.09; CI, 1.06-1.12; P < .001) were more likely to have LGA infants. Maternal smoking (OR 0.30; CI, 0.14-0.62; P = .001) and higher gestational age at birth (OR 0.91; CI, 0.84-0.99; P = .018) were associated with reduced risk. Subset univariate analysis showed that fetal abdominal circumference measurements at weeks 24 to 28 and 29 to 33 beyond the 75th percentile (OR 5.92 and 13.74, respectively) and 90th percentile (OR 4.57 and 15.89, respectively) were highly predictive of LGA.

CONCLUSIONS

Parity, smoking status, maternal BMI, gestational age, and ultrasound fetal abdominal circumference measurements were identified as useful predictors of LGA. Presence of these predictors may prompt closer monitoring of pregnancy and early therapeutic intervention to improve management and reduce the risk of adverse fetal and maternal outcomes.

Pregnancy outcomes of early detected gestational diabetes: a retrospective comparison cohort study, Qatar

OBJECTIVE

To compare pregnancy outcomes in patients with early versus usual gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

The Women's Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar.

PARTICIPANTS

GDM women who attended and delivered in the Women's Hospital, between January and December 2016. GDM was diagnosed based on the 2013-WHO criteria. The study included 801 patients; of which, 273 E-GDM and 528 U-GDM. Early GDM (E-GDM) and usual GDM (U-GDM) were defined as GDM detected before and after 24 weeks' gestation, respectively.

OUTCOMES

Maternal and neonatal outcomes and the impact of timing of GDM-diagnosis on pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

At conception, E-GDM women were older (mean age 33.5±5.4 vs 32.0±5.4 years, p<0.001) and had higher body mass index (33.0±6.3 vs 31.7±6.1 kg/m2, p=0.0059) compared with U-GDM. The mean fasting, and 1-hour blood glucose levels were significantly higher in E-GDM vs U-GDM, respectively (5.3±0.7 vs 4.0±0.7 mmol/L, p<0.001 and 10.6±1.7 vs 10.3±1.6 mmol/L, p<0.001). More patients in the U-GDM were managed on diet alone compared with E-GDM (53.6% vs 27.5%, p<0.001). E-GDM subjects gained less weight per week compared with U-GDM (0.02±0.03 vs 0.12±0.03 kg/week, p=0.0274). Maternal outcomes were similar between the two groups apart from a higher incidence of preterm labour (25.5% vs 14.4%; p<0.001) and caesarean section (52.4% vs 42.8%; p=0.01) in E-GDM vs U-GDM, respectively. After correction for covariates; gestational age at which GDM was diagnosed was associated with increased risk of macrosomia (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11; p<0.05) and neonatal hypoglycaemia (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11; p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our data support the concept of early screening and treatment of GDM in high-risk patients. More data are needed to examine the optimal time for screening.

Early screening and treatment of gestational diabetes in high-risk women improves maternal and neonatal outcomes: A retrospective clinical audit

AIMS

Evidence suggests that screening for gestational diabetes (GDM) occurs too late in pregnancy, when changes in glucose metabolism and fetal growth rates can already be detected. In August 2016 NHS Lothian began screening women with risk factors for GDM during early pregnancy (11-13 weeks). We hypothesised that an earlier identification and treatment of dysglycaemia would improve pregnancy outcomes compared to previous standard care.

METHODS

We compared management and outcomes for singleton pregnancies with GDM delivering at Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, UK, diagnosed through routine or early screening from 01/01/2015-31/10/2017 (routine screening n = 335, early screening n = 241).

RESULTS

Early screening increased the proportion of women diagnosed before 24 weeks' gestation (n = 59/335, 17.6% vs n = 103/241, 42.7%, p < 0.001) but did not change the average monthly rate of diagnosis. Early screening increased the median duration of GDM during pregnancy (71 vs 93 days of gestation, p < 0.001) with no significant changes in the pharmacological management. Early screening improved the primary composite outcome (emergency caesarean section, neonatal hypoglycaemia and macrosomia; n = 138/335, 41.2% vs n = 73/241, 30.3%, adjusted Odds Ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.62 [0.43-0.91].

CONCLUSIONS

There is a role for early screening and management of GDM however it is unclear whether this represents a cost-effective intervention.

Isolated polyhydramnios in the third trimester: is a gestational diabetes evaluation of value?. Gynecol Endocrinol 2017;33:849-852. [PMID: 28488900 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1323857]

We evaluated implications of testing for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in pregnancies complicated by third trimester isolated polyhydramnios with previous negative diabetes screening test. In this retrospective cohort study of 104 pregnant women with polyhydramnios between 2005 and 2013, all had normal first trimester fasting glucose and normal glucose challenge test (GCT < 140 mg/dL). Late onset GDM was diagnosed in five women (4.8%) with isolated polyhydramnios, one abnormal value in the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was identified in four additional women (3.8%). No significant differences were found in risk factors for GDM, mean second trimester GCT (117.5 vs. 107.2 mg/dL, p = 0.38) or fasting glucose values (82 vs. 86 mg/dL, p = 0.29) between women in the polyhydramnios group with and without late GDM diagnosis. Moreover, no significant difference was found in relation to the mode of delivery or birth weight between the studied groups (3437 ± 611 vs. 3331 ± 515 g, p = 0.63). Diagnosis of third trimester polyhydramnios was not associated with increased risk for GDM or neonatal complications.

High Fasting Plasma Glucose during Early Pregnancy: A Review about Early Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) is nowadays routinely measured during early pregnancy to detect preexisting diabetes (FPG ≥ 7 mmol/L). This screening has concomitantly led to identify early intermediate hyperglycemia, defined as FPG in the 5.1 to 6.9 mmol/L range, also early gestational diabetes mellitus (eGDM). Early FPG has been associated with poor pregnancy outcomes, but the recommendation by the IADPSG to refer women with eGDM for immediate management is more pragmatic than evidence based. Although eGDM is characterized by insulin resistance and associated with classical risk factors for type 2 diabetes and incident diabetes after delivery, it is not necessarily associated with preexisting prediabetes. FPG ≥ 5.1 mmol/L in early pregnancy is actually poorly predictive of gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed after 24 weeks of gestation. An alternative threshold should be determined but may vary according to ethnicity, gestational age, and body mass index. Finally, observational data suggest that early management of intermediate hyperglycemia may improve prognosis, through reduced gestational weight gain and potential early introduction of hypoglycemic agents. Considering all these issues, we suggest an algorithm for the management of eGDM based on early FPG levels that would be measured in case of risk factors. Nevertheless, interventional randomized trials are still missing.

Screening and Treatment for Early-Onset Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the current evidence for screening and treatment for early-onset gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) RECENT FINDINGS: Many of the women with early GDM in the first trimester do not have evidence of hyperglycemia at 24-28 weeks' gestation. A high proportion (15-70%) of women with GDM can be detected early in pregnancy depending on the setting, criteria used and screening strategy. However, there remains no good evidence for any of the diagnostic criteria for early-onset GDM. In a meta-analysis of 13 cohort studies, perinatal mortality (relative risk (RR) 3.58 [1.91, 6.71]), neonatal hypoglycemia (RR 1.61 [1.02, 2.55]), and insulin use (RR 1.71 [1.45, 2.03]) were greater among early-onset GDM women compared to late-onset GDM women, despite treatment. Considering the high likelihood of benefit from treatment, there is an urgent need for randomized controlled trials that investigate any benefits and possible harms of treatment of early-onset GDM.