Efficacy and safety of dienogest in the treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of dienogest (DNG) in the prolonged conservative drug management of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). The findings from this study are intended to serve as a valuable reference for clinical decision-making regarding medication in the context of DIE.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA Statement, we searched EMBASE, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Medline databases for relevant literature published in the public domain from the date of establishment of the database until October 2023. Subsequently, all English publications on clinical studies using DNG for the treatment of DIE were included. Studies involving surgical intervention or drug therapy for postoperative recurrence were excluded. All literature included in the review underwent risk assessment of bias. Two evaluators independently screened the publications, conducted a quality assessment of each article and extracted data. We used Revman 5.4 for the meta-analysis of the included literature.

RESULTS

Our final analysis consisted of five clinical studies, involving a total of 256 patients. We found that there were significant improvements in the following indicators post-medication as compared to levels before taking the medication: dysmenorrhea (MD = 4.24, 95 % CI: 2.92-5.56, P < 0.00001), non-menstrual pelvic pain (MD = 3.11, 95 % CI: 2.34-3.88, P < 0.00001), dyspareunia (MD = 1.93, 95 % CI: 1.50-2.37, P < 0.00001), dyschezia (MD = 2.48, 95 % CI: 1.83-3.12, P < 0.00001), and rectosigmoid nodule size (MD = 0.32, 95 % CI: 0.18-0.46, P < 0.00001). Compared with pre-medication levels, the following indicators were significantly worse: headache (RR = 0.03, 95 % CI: 0.00-0.23, P = 0.0006), decreased libido (RR = 0.08, 95 % CI: 0.01-0.62, P = 0.02); and there was no significant improvement in dysuria (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DNG showed efficacy in relieving pain-related symptoms and significantly reducing the size of the lesions when used in the drug conservative treatment of DIE.

Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Women with Endometriosis and Adenomyosis: Can Machines Ever Be Worse Than Humans?

Artificial intelligence (AI) is experiencing advances and integration in all medical specializations, and this creates excitement but also concerns. This narrative review aims to critically assess the state of the art of AI in the field of endometriosis and adenomyosis. By enabling automation, AI may speed up some routine tasks, decreasing gynecologists' risk of burnout, as well as enabling them to spend more time interacting with their patients, increasing their efficiency and patients' perception of being taken care of. Surgery may also benefit from AI, especially through its integration with robotic surgery systems. This may improve the detection of anatomical structures and enhance surgical outcomes by combining intra-operative findings with pre-operative imaging. Not only that, but AI promises to improve the quality of care by facilitating clinical research. Through the introduction of decision-support tools, it can enhance diagnostic assessment; it can also predict treatment effectiveness and side effects, as well as reproductive prognosis and cancer risk. However, concerns exist regarding the fact that good quality data used in tool development and compliance with data sharing guidelines are crucial. Also, professionals are worried AI may render certain specialists obsolete. This said, AI is more likely to become a well-liked team member rather than a usurper.

Comparison of efficacy between levonorgestrel intrauterine system and dienogest in adenomyosis: a randomized clinical trial

Background

Medical management of adenomyosis is an emerging perspective in modern gynecology. Though levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and dienogest (DNG) effectively relieve symptoms in adenomyosis, neither has been approved for the same indication. Our study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of these progestins in treating adenomyosis.

Objective

To study the efficacy and safety of LNG-IUS versus DNG in patients with symptomatic adenomyosis.

Design

Open-labeled, parallel, single-centered, randomized clinical trial.

Methods

Patients with adenomyosis-associated pain with or without abnormal uterine bleeding were randomly allocated to either LNG-IUS group or DNG group. The primary outcome was a reduction in painful symptoms after 12 weeks of treatment measured by visual analog scale (VAS) score. Changes in menstrual blood loss (MBL), improvement in quality of life (QoL), and adverse drug reactions were also analyzed.

Results

The VAS score significantly decreased from baseline in both groups. The baseline and post-treatment VAS scores in the LNG-IUS group were 6.41 ± 1.07 and 3.41 ± 1.04 (p = <0.001) and in the DNG group, were 6.41 ± 0.95 and 3.12 ± 1.40 (p = <0.001), respectively. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the LNG-IUS group experienced lighter MBL as compared to the DNG group [27/30 (90%) in the LNG-IUS group versus 17/22 (77.2%) in the DNG group (p = 0.006)]. Both the groups had improvement in QOL scores calculated by the World Heath Organisation QOL scale (WHOQOL BREF) questionnaire; however, it was more pronounced in the DNG group [(28.76 ± 30.47 in the LNG-IUS group versus 48.26 ± 44.91 in the DNG group (p = 0.04)]. Both the agents were safe as there were no reported major adverse drug reactions.

Conclusion

DNG can be an effective and safe alternative to LNG-IUS for the medical management of adenomyosis.

Trial registration

The trial was prospectively registered at the clinical trial registry - India (CTRI) vide CTRI number CTRI/2020/05/025186.

Risk factors of heavy uterine bleeding in patients with endometriosis and adenomyosis treated with dienogest

OBJECTIVE

Dienogest (DNG), a fourth-generation progestin, reduces pain associated with endometriosis and uterine adenomyosis; however, it is associated with irregular uterine bleeding that can cause anemia and poor quality of life. We investigated risk factors for heavy bleeding following DNG administration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively investigated patients who received DNG for risk factors of heavy uterine bleeding, including clinical diagnosis, use of pretreatment gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, smoking, cancer antigen 125, and blood hormone levels. We additionally assessed the uterine area in patients with uterine adenomyosis, the major axis of the uterine body, the major axis of myometrial thickness, the site of tumor development, and the site of myoma development in patients with uterine fibroids.

RESULTS

Eighty Japanese patients were administered DNG. The median age was 41 (range: 24-51) years. The odds ratio (OR) for moderate-to-severe bleeding according to clinical diagnosis were 0.33 (P = 0.011) for endometrioma and 9.00 (P = 0.049) for uterine adenomyosis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the uterine area associated with uterine adenomyosis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.909 between those with major and minor bleeding, with an optimal cut-off value of 7388.2 mm2. The uterine body major axis had an AUC of 0.946, with an optimal cut-off value of 78.3 mm. The major axis of myometrial thickness had an AUC of 0.855, with an optimal cut-off value of 46.8 mm.

CONCLUSION

Patients with endometrioma treated with DNG were less likely to experience heavy uterine bleeding. Uterine bleeding in patients with uterine adenomyosis and adenomyosis associated with uterine fibroids should be closely monitored while administering DNG.

Current Medical Therapy for Adenomyosis: From Bench to Bedside

Adenomyosis, characterized by the growth of endometrial tissue within the uterine wall, poses significant challenges in treatment. The literature primarily focuses on managing abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and dysmenorrhea, the main symptoms of adenomyosis. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and tranexamic acid provide limited support for mild symptoms or symptom re-exacerbation during hormone therapy. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is commonly employed in adenomyosis management, showing promise in symptom improvement and reducing uterine size, despite the lack of standardized guidelines. Dienogest (DNG) also exhibits potential benefits, but limited evidence hinders treatment recommendations. Danazol, while effective, is limited by androgenic side effects. Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) may be less effective than progestins but can be considered for contraception in young patients. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists effectively manage symptoms but induce menopausal symptoms with prolonged use. GnRH antagonists are a recent option requiring further investigation. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) show promise in alleviating AUB and pelvic pain, but their safety necessitates exploration and limited use within trials for refractory patients. This review highlights the complexity of diagnosing adenomyosis, its coexistence with endometriosis and uterine leiomyomas, and its impact on fertility and quality of life, complicating treatment decisions. It emphasizes the need for research on guidelines for medical management, fertility outcomes, long-term effects of therapies, and exploration of new investigational targets. Future research should optimize therapeutic strategies, expand our understanding of adenomyosis and its management, and establish evidence-based guidelines to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

The role of the junctional zone in the management of adenomyosis with infertility

The junctional zone (JZ) is an important structure in the myometrium that maintains uterine fertility. Changes in the junctional zone are closely related to infertility and adenomyosis (ADS). As an increasing number of young women are affected by ADS, the disease is no longer considered typical of women over 40. With these changes, an increasing number of patients refuse hysterectomy and desire fertility preservation treatment. At the same time, ADS is a crucial factor causing female infertility. Therefore, the treatment of ADS-related infertility and preservation of reproductive function is one of the other major challenges facing clinicians. For these young patients, preserving fertility and even promoting reproduction has become a new challenge. Therefore, we searched and summarized these studies on PubMed and Google Scholar using keywords such as "adenomyosis", "junctional zone", and "infertility" to explore infertility causes, diagnosis, and treatment of ADS patients who wish to preserve their uterus or fertility and become pregnant, focusing on the junctional zone, to obtain a full appreciation of the new perspective on this disease.

Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Adenomyomectomy on Perinatal Outcomes

Objectives

The objective of this study was to observe the influence of laparoscopic adenomyomectomy on perinatal outcomes.

Materials and Methods

The retrospective cohort study included 43 pregnant cases with adenomyosis who did not undergo laparoscopic surgery before pregnancy (nonsurgery group; 26 cases) and did (surgery group; 17 cases). To evaluate the impact of surgery on perinatal outcomes, nine obstetric complications including preterm delivery, hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, placental malposition, oligohydramnios, gestational diabetes mellitus, uterine rupture, abruptio placentae, and postpartum hemorrhage were selected. One obstetric complication was counted as one point (Maximum 9 points for one person). The obstetrical morbidity was compared by adding up the number of relevant events (0-9) between the two groups. Apgar score, umbilical artery pH (UApH), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and neonatal death were also examined.

Results

The surgery group had a significantly lower prevalence of fetal growth restriction compared to the nonsurgery group (nonsurgery vs. surgery; 26.9%, 7/26 vs. 0%, 0/17: P = 0.031). No differences were found in the morbidity of the nine obstetric complications (19.2%, 45/234 vs. 13.7%, 21/153), gestational weeks (mean ± standard deviation, 37.2 ± 2.4 vs. 36.4 ± 3.2), birth weight (2573.6 ± 557.9 vs. 2555.4 ± 680.8 g), Apgar score (1, 5 min; 8.0 ± 0.7 vs. 7.7 ± 1.2, 8.9 ± 0.6 vs. 8.5 ± 1.8), UApH (7.28 ± 0.08 vs. 7.28 ± 0.06), NICU admission (26.9%, 7/26 vs. 41.2%, 7/17), and neonatal death (0%, 0%) between both groups.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy may not increase obstetric complications, although attention must be paid to uterine rupture during pregnancy.

Directive clinique no 437 : Diagnostic et prise en charge de l'adénomyose

OBJECTIF

Décrire les pratiques actuelles fondées sur des données probantes pour le diagnostic et la prise en charge de l'adénomyose.

POPULATION CIBLE

Toutes les patientes en âge de procréer qui ont un utérus.

OPTIONS

Les options diagnostiques sont l'échographie endovaginale et l'imagerie par résonance magnétique. Les options thérapeutiques doivent être adaptées aux symptômes (saignements menstruels abondants, douleur et/ou infertilité) et comprendre des options médicamenteuses (anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens, acide tranexamique, contraceptifs oraux combinés, système intra-utérin à libération de lévonorgestrel, diénogest, autres progestatifs, analogues de la gonadotrophine), des options interventionnelles (embolisation de l'artère utérine) et des options chirurgicales (ablation de l'endomètre, excision de l'adénomyose, hystérectomie). RéSULTATS: Les critères de jugement sont la réduction des saignements menstruels abondants, l'atténuation de la douleur pelvienne (dysménorrhée, dyspareunie, douleur pelvienne chronique) et l'amélioration du devenir reproductif (fertilité, avortement spontané, issues de grossesse défavorables). BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: Par la présentation des méthodes de diagnostic et des options de prise en charge, cette directive sera bénéfique pour les patientes qui expriment des plaintes de nature gynécologique potentiellement causées par l'adénomyose, en particulier celles qui souhaitent préserver leur fertilité. La directive sera également utile aux praticiens qui pourront améliorer leurs connaissances sur les différentes options. DONNéES PROBANTES: Des recherches ont été effectuées dans les bases de données MEDLINE Reviews, MEDLINE ALL, Cochrane, PubMed et Embase. La recherche initiale a été réalisée en 2021 et mise à jour avec les articles pertinents en 2022. Les termes de recherche utilisés sont les suivants : adenomyosis, adenomyoses, endometritis (utilisés ou indexés sous adenomyosis avant 2012), (endometrium AND myometrium) uterine adenomyosis/es, symptom/s/matic adenomyosis ET [diagnosis, symptoms, treatment, guideline, outcome, management, imaging, sonography, pathogenesis, fertility, infertility, therapy, histology, ultrasound, review, meta-analysis, evaluation]. Les articles retenus sont des essais cliniques randomisés, des méta-analyses, des revues systématiques, des études observationnelles et des études de cas. Des articles dans toutes les langues ont été répertoriés et examinés. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (Tableau A1 pour les définitions et Tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Obstétriciens-gynécologues, radiologistes, médecins de famille, urgentologues, sages-femmes, infirmières autorisées, infirmières praticiennes, étudiants en médecine, résidents et moniteurs cliniques (fellows). RéSUMé POUR TWITTER: L'adénomyose est fréquemment observée chez les femmes en âge de procréer. Il existe des options de diagnostic et de prise en charge qui préservent la fertilité. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.

Guideline No. 437: Diagnosis and Management of Adenomyosis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the current evidence-based diagnosis and management of adenomyosis.

TARGET POPULATION

All patients with a uterus of reproductive age.

OPTIONS

Diagnostic options include transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Treatment options should be tailored to symptoms (heavy menstrual bleeding, pain, and/or infertility) and include medical options (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, tranexamic acid, combined oral contraceptives, levonorgestrel intrauterine system, dienogest, other progestins, gonadotropin-releasing analogues), interventional options (uterine artery embolization), and surgical options (endometrial ablation, excision of adenomyosis, hysterectomy).

OUTCOMES

Outcomes of interest include reduction in heavy menstrual bleeding, reduction in pelvic pain (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain), and improvement in reproductive outcomes (fertility, miscarriage, adverse pregnancy outcomes).

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

This guideline will benefit patients with gynaecological complaints that may be caused by adenomyosis, especially those patients who wish to preserve their fertility, by presenting diagnostic methods and management options. It will also benefit practitioners by improving their knowledge of various options.

EVIDENCE

Databases searched were MEDLINE Reviews, MEDLINE ALL, Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE. The initial search was completed in 2021 and updated with relevant articles in 2022. Search terms included adenomyosis, adenomyoses, endometritis (used/indexed as adenomyosis before 2012), (endometrium AND myometrium) uterine adenomyosis/es, symptom/s/matic adenomyosis] AND [diagnosis, symptoms, treatment, guideline, outcome, management, imaging, sonography, pathogenesis, fertility, infertility, therapy, histology, ultrasound, review, meta-analysis, evaluation]. Articles included randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, observational studies, and case reports. Articles in all languages were searched and reviewed.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Table A1 for definitions and Table A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Obstetrician-gynaecologists, radiologists, family physicians, emergency physicians, midwives, registered nurses, nurse practitioners, medical students, residents, and fellows.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Adenomyosis is common in reproductive-aged women. There are diagnostic and management options that preserve fertility available.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

The Asian Society of Endometriosis and Adenomyosis guidelines for managing adenomyosis

This is the first guidelines for adenomyosis from the Asian Society of Endometriosis and Adenomyosis.

Prediction of the final menstrual period in women taking Dienogest using estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone values: a case-control study

Dienogest (DNG) is widely used to treat dysmenorrhea associated with estrogen-dependent diseases such as endometriosis and adenomyosis. DNG becomes unnecessary after menopause when estrogen secretion declines drastically. However, there are no clear criteria for when to halt DNG in perimenopausal patients. Menstruation and dysmenorrhea often resume after discontinuation due to approaching menopause. This case-control study used serum estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels to predict whether menstruation would resume in perimenopausal women after discontinuation of DNG. The study enrolled patients aged ≥40 years with endometriosis and/or adenomyosis and who had either completed oral DNG therapy (DNG group) or had spontaneous menopause without hormone therapy (control group). We assessed estradiol and FSH values before DNG termination or the final menstrual period. DNG group members that resumed menstruation after DNG termination (D (+) group, n = 17) had significantly higher estradiol and lower FSH levels than those who did not (D (-) group, n = 22) up to four months before DNG termination but not from four to 12 months. Estradiol and FSH levels were not significantly different between the D (-) and control groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves created from the estradiol and FSH values indicated that menstruation resumed when levels were ≥17 pg/mL and <100 mIU/mL, respectively. In contrast, menstruation did not resume in cases of estradiol ≤20 pg/mL and FSH >80 mIU/mL. The study results provide useful criteria for deciding when to terminate DNG in perimenopausal patients that consider their tolerance for resuming menstruation. Applications to menopause-inducing therapy for uterine fibroids and other conditions are anticipated. Further large-scale studies are needed.

Establishment of a novel mouse model of adenomyosis suitable for longitudinal and quantitative analysis and perinatal outcome studies

The purpose of this study was to establish a novel mouse model of adenomyosis suitable for longitudinal and quantitative analyses and perinatal outcome studies. Using a 30 G needle, the entire uterine wall of one horn was mechanically punctured at a frequency of 100 times/1 cm (adenomyosis horn). The other horn was left unpunctured (control horn). Balb/c mice were sacrificed on day 14 (D14) or day 65 (D65) (n = 3 each). The uterus was fixed, paraffin-embedded, sliced, and stained. Lesions were detected and counted, and their volumes were measured. Cell proliferation and fibrosis were assessed by Ki67 and Masson's Trichrome staining, respectively. Blood vessels were detected using CD31 immunostaining. Some of the mice (n = 4), were mated and the date of delivery, litter size, number of implantations, and number and volume of postpartum lesions were measured. The number of lesions per horn did not differ between D14 and D65. The volume of the entire lesion was significantly greater on D65 than on D14 (p < 0.0001). The volume of the epithelial part of the lesion was significantly greater in D65 (p < 0.0001). The volume of the stromal part of the lesion was also greater on D65 (p < 0.0001). The percentage of Ki67 positive cells in the epithelial part of the lesion was significantly higher on D14 (p < 0.05). In contrast, the percentage of Ki67-positive cells in the stromal part was significantly higher on D65 (p < 0.01). Vascular density in the lesions was higher in on D65 (p < 0.05). The percentage of fibrotic area was significantly higher on D65 (p < 0.01). The date of delivery was slightly earlier than that reported for healthy mice of the same strain. The litter size was smaller than that reported in previous research. The number of implantation sites did not differ between the control and the adenomyosis horn. The number and volume of lesions did not differ between the non-pregnant and postpartum groups. This model can be applied to evaluate the pathogenesis of adenomyosis, validate the efficacy of therapeutic agents, and evaluate the effect of adenomyosis on pregnancy and vice versa.

Long-term conservative management of symptomatic bladder endometriosis: A case series of 17 patients

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the course of long-term conservative management of bladder endometriosis (BE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 17 cases of BE conservatively managed without surgery in our facility. The following factors were analyzed: age, medical history, lesion size, symptoms, hormonal treatment, and follow-up outcomes.

RESULTS

In this study, 15 patients received hormonal therapy and 2 did not. Oral contraceptive (OC), dienogest (DNG), and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) were administered as the first regimen in 7, 5, and 3 patients, respectively. Of the 7 patients, OC administration was effective in alleviating urinary symptoms in all but 2 patients. Of 3 patients who received GnRHa, 2 switched to OC and then DNG, and 1 patient discontinued the treatment because of adverse effects. Of 5 patients who received DNG, all experienced symptom relief. DNG, OC, and GnRHa administration were effective and tolerable in 9 of 10 patients (90.0%), in 5 of 9 patients (55.6%), and in 2 of 3 patients (66.7%), respectively. In particular, 3 patients completed DNG treatment until menopause. The size of the BE lesion significantly decreased after 3 months of DNG administration, and the reduction effect was maintained until 48 months thereafter.

CONCLUSION

This study proposed that hormonal therapy for BE is an effective option for those who are not planning to conceive or to undergo surgery. Specifically, DNG may be suitable for patients refusing surgery, considering the effectiveness and tolerance for long-term use.

Conservative surgical and drug therapies for adenomyosis Medicine

Adenomyosis is a benign invasion/infiltration of endometrial glands and stroma in the uterine myometrium. The optimal choice of adenomyosis treatment remains a subject of discussion. For patients with adenomyosis without fertility requirements, hysterectomy can be performed by laparotomy or laparoscopic surgery to eliminate symptoms. However, this is an inadequate option for women who want to preserve fertility or avoid more extensive surgery. To summarize the medicine and conservative surgery treatment for adenomyosis. An extensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) without language restriction. The search terms were as follows: adenomyomas, adenomyosis, conservative therapy; combined therapy; medicine; surgery. The search included all titles and abstracts assessing conservative treatment for adenomyosis including medical and surgical therapy. All published papers were analyzed if considered relevant. Increasing current conservative treatments will not only improve the quality of life of the patients but also preserve fertility. Therefore, conservative treatment is extremely important for patients with fertility requirements or a strong desire to retain the uterus. Conservative treatment for adenomyosis may become a future trend in the field of gynecology.

Sanders A, Sobel M. Current diagnosis and management of adenomyosis in Canada: A survey of Canadian gynaecologists

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to understand how Canadian Obstetricians/Gynaecologists (OBGYNs) diagnose and manage adenomyosis.

Methods:

This cross-sectional study was performed via an online survey distributed to 262 OBGYNs at three Canadian universities (University of Toronto, University of Calgary, and McMaster University).

Results:

A total of 137 responses were obtained out of 262 OBGYNs (52.3%) with a completion rate of 98%. Adenomyosis was a diagnosis in 6%–10% of patients seen by OBGYNs. The most common clinical symptoms included heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) (82.8%) and dysmenorrhea (91.0%). Most participants (83%) used transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) as first-line imaging for diagnosis of adenomyosis. Many respondents (35.8%) indicated that adenomyosis was not associated with infertility or recurrent miscarriage. Treatment considerations for all patients with adenomyosis included levonorgestrel intra-uterine system (LNG-IUS) (91.8%), hysterectomy (88.8%), expectant management (85.1%), combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) (83.6%), tranexamic acid (81.3%), gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists (64.2%), depo-provera (64.2%), dienogest (57.5%), and norethisterone acetate (NETA) (40.3%). Treatments for adenomyosis in patients wishing to conceive included expectant management (85.1%), tranexamic acid (79.1%), CHC (44.8%), LNG-IUS (32.8%), and GnRH agonists (35.8%). Excision of adenomyosis would only be offered by 24% of respondents. Uterine artery embolization (UAE) would not be used in the treatment of adenomyosis by 44% of respondents. Finally, 82.8% of respondents would use improvement of clinical symptoms to follow treatment success.

Conclusion:

Practice varies across Canada despite recent emerging evidence in the diagnosis and management of adenomyosis, highlighting the need for a clinical practice guideline on adenomyosis.

A cohort study of the efficacy of the dienogest and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in women with adenomyosis and dysmenorrhea

PURPOSE

To study the efficacy and safety of the dienogest and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) in symptomatic females with uterine adenomyosis.

METHODS

A total of 127 patients with adenomyosis with a chief complaint of dysmenorrhea were recruited. The first group received 2 mg of dienogest (DNG) daily, whereas the second group received goserelin acetate (GS) (3.6 mg/4 weeks) for 12 weeks. Outpatient follow-up was undertaken after 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Among 127 women, 56/63 (88.9%) patients completed the treatment in the DNG group, whereas 62/64 (96.9%) patients completed the treatment in the GS group. A significant decrease in dysmenorrhea symptoms as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS) and Carcinoma antigen125 (CA125) after 12 weeks of treatment was observed in both groups (p < .001). The hemoglobin of anemic patients did not significantly improve after 12 weeks of treatment (p＝0.21) and the uterine volume slightly increased without statistical significance (p＝0.10) in the DNG group. Simultaneously, The hemoglobin of anemic patients significantly improved (p < .001) and the uterine volume significantly decreased (p < .001) in the GS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Dienogest effectively alleviates the symptoms of dysmenorrhea in patients with adenomyosis, but it cannot improve the anemia or reduce the size of the uterus. GnRH-a is more effective in improving anemia and reducing the uterine volume in patients with adenomyosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900024958.

Evaluation of pharmacological interventions in the management of adenomyosis: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Medical management of adenomyosis largely revolves around symptom management, with very few drugs having received regulatory approval for the disease. However, the level of evidence supporting the use of pharmacological interventions is low, making it difficult to establish their efficacy in the treatment of adenomyosis. Hence, the aim of our systematic review is to identify the strength of evidence currently available and evaluate the effectiveness of different medical interventions in the management of adenomyosis.

METHODS

The search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov. Articles published between 1 January 2010 and 30 November 2020 were considered. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies that assessed the efficacy of medical interventions in patients with adenomyosis were included. The quality of the data was analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

LNG-IUS (levonorgestrel intrauterine system), dienogest and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues were effective in reducing pain, uterine volume and menstrual bleeding. However, these data were largely obtained in the non-trial setting and were fraught with issues that included patient selection, short duration of therapy, small sample size, and limited long-term safety and effectiveness data.

CONCLUSIONS

Although LNG-IUS, dienogest and GnRH analogues have better evidence for effectiveness in adenomyosis, the need of the hour is to thoroughly evaluate other novel molecules for adenomyosis using well-designed randomized controlled trials.

Characterization of patients that can continue conservative treatment for adenomyosis

Background

Historically, hysterectomy has been the radical treatment for adenomyosis. Although, some patients may not want to have their uterus removed, patients often have to no choice but to request hysterectomy during conservative treatment. The factors necessitating these hysterectomies remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine which patients can continue conservative treatment for adenomyosis.

Methods

We selected women diagnosed with adenomyosis and provided with conservative treatment at the Kindai University Hospital and Osaka Red Cross Hospital in Osaka Japan from 2008 to 2017. Age at diagnosis, parity, uterine size, subtype of adenomyosis, type of conservative treatment, and timing of hysterectomy for cases with difficulty continuing conservative treatment were examined retrospectively.

Results

A total of 885 patients were diagnosed with adenomyosis, and 124 started conservative treatment. Conservative treatment was continued in 96 patients (77.4%) and hysterectomy was required in 28 patients (22.6%). The cumulative hysterectomy rate was 32.4%, and all women had hysterectomy within 63 months. In the classification tree, 82% (23/28) of women aged 46 years or younger were able to continue conservative treatment when parity was zero or one. In those with parity two and over, 95% (20/21) of those aged 39 years and older had hysterectomy.

Conclusions

Patients who continue conservative treatment for approximately 5 years are more likely to have successful preservation of the uterus. Multiparity and higher age at diagnosis are factors that contribute to hysterectomy after conservative treatment. Parity and age at diagnosis may be stratifying factors in future clinical trials of hormone therapy.

A controlled clinical trial comparing potent progestins, LNG-IUS and dienogest, for the treatment of women with adenomyosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of two progestins, levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and dienogest (DNG), for adenomyosis.

METHODS

This study enrolled 157 women with adenomyosis, randomized to either LNG-IUS (n = 76) or DNG (n = 81) groups as a controlled clinical trial for 72 months. Participants were classified by three different localizations of adenomyosis: diffuse, focal, and extrinsic. VAS (Visual analog scale) score, days, and amount of uterine bleeding were assessed. Uterine volume or bone mineral density (BMD) were measured by three-dimensional ultrasonography or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

LNG-IUS and DNG comparably reduced pain scores in patients with adenomyosis. With regard to pain control, DNG offered greater efficacy than LNG-IUS in 3 months of treatment. In all types of adenomyosis, the days of bleeding after 12 months with DNG were significantly decreased compared to those with LNG-IUS. The decrease of whole uterine body was transient in any subtypes. A comparable decrease in BMD due to age-related changes in both groups was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

LNG-IUS and DNG could be useful for long-term management of adenomyosis. In terms of durations of uterine bleeding, DNG was superior to LNG-IUS for 6 years.

Clinical evaluation of HIFU combined with GnRH-a and LNG-IUS for adenomyosis patients who failed to respond to drug therapies: two-year follow-up results

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical effect of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in the treatment of adenomyosis patients who failed to respond to drug therapies.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 47 patients with adenomyosis who had failed to respond to drug therapies and had no fertility desires were treated with HIFU combined with GnRH-a and LNG-IUS. The score of dysmenorrhea and menstrual volume were measured at pre and 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-month post-HIFU.

RESULTS

All patients completed HIFU ablation without major postoperative complications. Compared with the symptom scores before the HIFU treatment, the score of dysmenorrhea and menstrual volume decreased significantly at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after HIFU treatment (p < 0.05), but no significant difference was observed between 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after HIFU (p > 0.05). The clinical success rate was 100%, 100%, 95.7% and 93.6% respectively at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after the combined treatment.

CONCLUSION

The combined therapeutic regimen of HIFU, GnRH-a and LNS-IUS is safe and effective, which can be an alternative treatment option for patients with adenomyosis who failed to respond to drug therapies to avoid adenomyomectomy or hysterectomy.

Current and Prospective Treatment of Adenomyosis

(1) Background: Adenomyosis is a poorly understood entity which makes it difficult to standardize treatment. In this paper we review and compare the currently approved medical and surgical treatments of adenomyosis and present the evidence behind them. (2) Methods: A PubMed search was conducted to identify papers related to the different treatments of adenomyosis. The search was limited to the English language. Articles were divided into medical and surgical treatments. (3) Results: Several treatment options have been studied and were found to be effective in the treatment of adenomyosis. (4) Conclusions: Further randomized controlled trials are needed to compare treatment modalities and establish a uniform treatment algorithm for adenomyosis.

Proposal for developing treatment algorithms of women with symptomatic adenomyosis: A single-center experience

AIMS

The most common symptoms of adenomyosis include heavy menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrhea. A variety of medical or surgical techniques are utilized for the treatment of adenomyosis, but there are currently no specific treatment guidelines and best practice recommendations for management. The aim of this study is to summarize current treatment strategies for women with symptomatic adenomyosis in a single-center university hospital in order to provide reliable information for developing treatment algorithms.

METHODS

We conducted an observational cross-sectional study using data from the adenomyosis cohort study from January 2008 to December 2020. Detailed information, including demographic, clinicopathological, and imaging data, were collected from 220 pathologically confirmed patients with adenomyosis.

RESULTS

First, we identified clinical and imaging characteristics in women who underwent surgery or hormone therapy, especially dienogest (DNG) treatment, as first-line treatment. Surgery was generally recommended for multiparous women over the age of 43, especially for patients with intrinsic adenomyosis. Next, we identified the parameters that allowed the continuation of DNG treatment. Oral DNG was given to certain patients with a myometrium thickness of 35 mm or greater and coexisting with endometriosis and/or uterine fibroids. To prevent serious bleeding, DNG treatment can be limited to women with extrinsic adenomyosis with a uterine length of 125 mm or less.

DISCUSSION

Our findings may provide useful information in developing an evidence-based treatment guideline for patients with symptomatic adenomyosis, nevertheless, further investigation is needed for the validation of treatment algorithms.

Perinatal outcomes associated with the positional relationship between the placenta and the adenomyosis lesion

INTRODUCTION

Although various perinatal complications have been reported to be increased in the pregnant patients with adenomyosis, it is not clear what type of patients with adenomyosis is more likely to cause obstetric complications. In this study, we focused on the positional relationship between the placenta and adenomyosis lesion in evaluating perinatal prognosis of pregnant patients with adenomyosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was carried out between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2019 in a single institution. Adenomyosis was diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS). To evaluate the influence of adenomyosis on perinatal outcomes, we classified the positional relationship between the placenta and the adenomyosis lesion into two groups and examined the perinatal prognosis of the patients with adenomyosis by analyzing their clinical records. Group I (n = 9) was defined when the placenta was not overlaid on adenomyosis lesion. Group II (n = 11) was defined when a part of the placenta was overlaid on adenomyosis lesion.

RESULTS

Twenty pregnant patients with adenomyosis were analyzed. There were no differences in clinical backgrounds between group I and group II. There was a significant increase in the obstetric morbidity in group II than that of Group I(group I: 6.3%, 4/63 vs group II: 18.6%, 26/77; P < 0.001). In group II, fetal growth restriction (FGR) was more frequent (0%, 0/9 vs 45.5%, 5/11; P = 0.042) and the birth weight was significantly lower than that in group I (2951.1 g ± 326.5 g vs 2318.9 ± 656.1 g; P = 0.037). There was a trend of lighter weight of the placenta in group II (550.6 ± 66.5 g vs 437.5 ± 117.8 g; P = 0.063) and the volume of bleeding during delivery was a higher trend in group II than that in group I (845.1 ± 367.1 g vs 1356 ± 604.8 g; P = 0.083). Group II was furtherly subdivided into group IIa (less than half the major axis of the placenta overlaid on adenomyosis lesion) and group IIb (more than half the major axis of placenta overlaid on adenomyosis lesion). The obstetric morbidity tended to be higher in group IIb than in group IIa (group IIa: 22.9%, 8/35 vs group IIb: 42.9%, 18/42); P = 0.09). In group IIb, the frequency of FGR was significantly higher (group IIa: 0%, 0/5 vs IIb: 83.3%, 5/6; P = 0.020) and the birth weight was significantly lower than those in group IIa (2656.8 ± 231.9 g vs 2037 ± 780.1 g; P = 0.040). All cases of FGR, hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP), and oligohydramnios were observed in group IIb.

CONCLUSION

Placental localization near adenomyosis may increase the risk of perinatal complications.

Study of dienogest clinical efficacy in the treatment of adenomyosis

Background:

A number of works provide information on the effectiveness of dienogest in uterine adenomyosis. However, information on the use of the drug at various degrees of the adenomatous nodes, is not presented in the available literature.

Aim:

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of dienogest in the treatment of patients with adenomyosis 2nd and 3rd stage and chronic pelvic pain.

Materials and methods:

A comprehensive clinical survey and treatment of 46 patients with signs of adenomyosis were carried out. Patients were divided into two groups: 28 patients with stage 2 adenomyosis, 18 patients with type 3 adenomyosis were included in the 2nd group. On the first phase of the menstrual cycle all patients underwent hysteroscopy for endoscopic verification of the diagnosis using the traditional Karl Storz hysteroscopic stand with separate treatment and diagnostic curettage of the uterine cavity and cervical canal, followed by histological examination. After surgical treatment all patients received dienogest at a dose 2 mg/day for 6 months. The treatment was performed during 6 months. After 3, 6, and 12 months of the study, the patients included in the survey underwent a comprehensive examination with a clinical assessment of the manifestations of the disease. The level of pain manifestations was evaluated on a visual analog scale (VAS) with a range of 0–10 points. During pain assessment, its manifestations were differentiated—pain due to dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, dyschezia, and chronic pelvic pain were evaluated.

Results:

In the group of patients with 2nd adenomyosis stage, the intake of dienogest for 6 months led to the absence of manifestations of uterine bleeding and dyschezia, a decrease in the frequency of dyspareunia—by 7.7 times. In patients with the 3rd stage of the disease, the decrease in the symptoms of adenomyosis was less pronounced, however, after taking the drug, a decrease in the frequency of uterine bleeding was found to be 6 times, dyspareunia 4 times, and dyschezia 5 times. Twelve months after the start of observation (6 months after the end of treatment), none of the patients with 2nd stage of disease showed severe pelvic pain, in the group with 3rd stage of adenomyosis there were only two of these patients (11.1%). At the same time, the vast majority of patients included in the study did not have manifestations of chronic pelvic pain—78.6% of patients with 2nd stage of adenomyosis and 55.6% of patients with 3rd stage of disease, the remaining 21.4% and 33.3% of patients of the first and second groups reported a significant decrease in the severity of pain.

Conclusions:

The inclusion of dienogest in the combined treatment of adenomyosis is clinically effective, contributing to the rapid and reliable relief of the main manifestations of the disease in patients with adenomyosis with grade 2 and 3 nodes. Treatment of adenomyosis with the use of dienogest is clinically effective, contributing to the rapid and reliable relief of the main manifestation of the disease.

Comparison of dienogest versus combined oral contraceptive pills in the treatment of women with adenomyosis: A randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of dienogest with combined oral contraceptives (COCs) for treating adenomyosis-associated symptoms.

METHODS

This was a randomized clinical trial including women with symptomatic adenomyosis conducted from March 1, 2019 to August 1, 2020 at Assiut Woman's Health Hospital, Egypt. Participants were randomly assigned to the dienogest group or COCs group. The primary outcome was the level of adenomyosis-associated pain from before to 6 months after treatment measured by a visual analog scale (VAS). Changes in the uterine bleeding pattern, uterine volume, and uterine artery blood flow were also reported.

RESULTS

The VAS score of pain was significantly decreased in both groups; however, the decreased rate was more pronounced in the dienogest group (3.21 ± 1.18) in comparison with the COCs group (4.92 ± 1.22). Bleeding pattern was improved greatly; uterine volume and uterine artery blood flow decreased significantly in the dienogest group. However, women in the dienogest group reported a higher rate of side effects.

CONCLUSION

Dienogest and COCs are effective in treating adenomyosis-associated symptoms after 6 months of use but dienogest is more effective. The decrease in uterine volume and uterine artery blood flow may be the cause of the treatment effect. Dienogest carries a higher risk of side effects.

CLINICAL TRIAL

gov: NCT03890042.

National survey of bladder endometriosis cases in Japan

AIM

We aimed to describe the clinical presentation, operative or medical management, and postoperative recurrence of bladder endometriosis (BE).

METHODS

We conducted a national survey to investigate BE cases from 2006 to 2016 in Japan. Histologically diagnosed cases were extracted and then investigated for the following factors: age at diagnosis, body mass index, symptoms, imaging modalities, surgical therapy, hormonal therapy, follow-up period, and postoperative recurrence.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients with pathologically benign BE were identified. Eighty patients underwent surgery, whereas nine did not. Moreover, 34 and 44 patients underwent transurethral resection (TUR) and partial cystectomy (PC), respectively. Cumulative recurrence rates were significantly higher with TUR than with PC (p < 0.05). The recurrence rate tended to be higher after laparoscopic PC (n = 24) than after open PC (n = 20), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.0879). Of the nine nonsurgical patients, eight received hormonal therapy and one did not. Efficacy rates of dienogest, GnRH agonist, and OC were 85.7%, 66.7%, and 66.7%, respectively. Of five patients with BE extending to the ureter or ureteral orifices, two underwent PC and ureteroneocystostomy and one underwent total nephroureterectomy due to renal function loss.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the postoperative recurrence of BE after TUR and PC. We found that cumulative recurrence rate is significantly lower after PC than after TUR. BE extending to the ureter or ureteral orifices is a very challenging condition. Further studies are required for the optimal management of BE.

Efficacy of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device is associated with different subtypes of adenomyosis: a retrospective study

Background

Although the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) has been widely applied in the treatment of adenomyosis, not all the patients are satisfied with its efficacy. The present retrospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy of LNG-IUD on different subtypes of adenomyosis.

Methods

The study comprised a cohort of 207 patients who received the LNG-IUD at the Women’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China, from June 2013 to June 2016. Different subtypes of adenomyosis were classified by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and patients were subcategorized into three groups (subtype I: intrinsic, n=70; subtype II: extrinsic, n=73; subtype IV: indeterminate, n=64). Multiple variables were compared among the different groups.

Results

Patient demographics, clinical features and the treatment effects of the LNG-IUD were compared between the three subtype groups. The numeric rating scale (NRS) and pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) score markedly decreased after insertion of the LNG-IUD compared with baseline in all patients in the three subtype groups (P<0.001 for all groups). Compared to the other two subtypes, the efficacy rate was lower and the spontaneous expulsion rate was higher in subtype IV adenomyosis patients than that in other two groups (P<0.05). The independent factor associated with the spontaneous expulsion of the system was suggested to be uterine size before IUD placement and bleeding amount after LNG-IUD treatment in the subtype I [P=0.029, hazards ratio (HR): 3.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09–6.88] and IV (P=0.045, HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.21) adenomyosis patients respectively.

Conclusions

The LNG-IUD is proved to be an effective approach to treat subtype I and II adenomyosis. However, further study is warranted to explore a more suitable protocol to treat this subtype IV adenomyosis due to the high incidence of treatment failure and expulsion.

A case of hemorrhagic shock occurred during dienogest therapy for uterine adenomyosis

We present a case of hemorrhagic shock occurred during dienogest therapy for uterine adenomyosis which necessitated an emergency hysterectomy. The patient was a 45-year-old woman with adenomyosis. Magnetic resonance imaging showed type I adenomyosis measuring 10 cm. She had a history of intimal thrombectomy of pulmonary embolism and had been receiving warfarin and aspirin until the onset of the hemorrhagic shock. Following 6-month of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue, dienogest was commenced. Nine months after switching to dienogest, the patient experienced a persistent abnormal uterine bleeding for 2 weeks, eventually causing a massive bleeding and was transferred to our emergency room. A diagnosis of hemorrhagic shock with a severe anemia (hemoglobin 3.6 g/dL) was made. Despite blood transfusion and warfarin antagonization, continuous bleeding ≥150 g/h was not controlled. Emergent hysterectomy was opted and enabled hemostasis. Although the number of patients with adenomyosis who can avoid surgery by dienogest is increasing, care must be taken during dienogest therapy, especially in patients with anticoagulants and after gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue treatment. To prevent such a critical event, careful management including patient education should be carried out.

Recurrence of uterine adenomyosis after administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and the efficacy of dienogest

This study elucidated the degree of adenomyosis recurrence following gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) discontinuation and dienogest efficiency for recurrent adenomyosis. This retrospective cohort study included 30 patients, divided into a group of patients whose progress was observed without providing additional therapy following GnRHa administration for six months (Group G) and a group of patients administered dienogest for six months following six months of GnRHa administration (Group D). Menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, abdominal fullness, and uterine volume were recorded prior to treatment, six months after the start of therapy (6 M), and 12 months after the start of therapy (12 M). In Group G (n = 15), although all subjective symptoms disappeared at 6 M, nearly all symptoms recurred at 12 M. Uterine volume significantly decreased from 341.0 cm³ to 156.0 cm³ at 6 M (p = .001) and significantly increased again to 282.3 cm³ at 12 M (p = .003). In Group D (n = 15), all subjective symptoms disappeared at 6 M, and only abdominal fullness returned in a significant number of patients (5 of 5; p = .021) at 12 M. Uterine volume decreased significantly at 6 M (p = .003) and significantly increased again from 162.5 cm³ to 205.6 cm³ at 12 M (p = .006). Subjective symptoms, except for abdominal fullness, did not recur when dienogest was administered after GnRHa.

Subtype I (intrinsic) adenomyosis is an independent risk factor for dienogest-related serious unpredictable bleeding in patients with symptomatic adenomyosis

We aimed to retrospectively analyze the risk factors of a continuous dienogest (DNG) therapy for serious unpredictable bleeding in patients with symptomatic adenomyosis. This is a retrospective study based on data extracted from medical records of 84 women treated with 2 mg of DNG orally each day between 2008 and 2017. 47 subjects were excluded from the original analyses due to an inadequate subcategorization into subtype I and subtype II and a lack of hemoglobin levels. The influence of various independent variables on serious unpredictable bleeding was assessed. Of the 37 eligible patients who received the continuous DNG therapy, 14 patients experienced serious unpredictable bleeding. Univariate analysis revealed that the serious bleeding group had subtype I adenomyosis (P = 0.027). There was no correlation between age, parity, minimum hemoglobin level before treatment, previous endometrial curettage, and duration of DNG administration, or uterine or adenomyosis size and the serious bleeding. A DNG-related serious unpredictable bleeding is associated with the structural type of adenomyosis (subtype I) in patients with symptomatic adenomyosis.

Significant risk factors for malignant transformation of ovarian endometrioma during dienogest treatment: a case report and retrospective study

BACKGROUND

To determine the prevalence of and risk factors for malignant transformation of ovarian endometrioma during dienogest therapy, which is very rare, we examined multiple cases of malignant transformation of ovarian endometrioma during dienogest therapy and performed a multivariate analysis of the records in our hospital.

METHODS

The medical records of 174 patients who underwent DNGT for the treatment of OMA from June 1, 2011, to May 31, 2018, were reviewed retrospectively with the approval of the Human Ethical Committee of the University of Teikyo Hospital. And we provided one representative case of MT with obtaining written informed consent. To assess the effects of six representative factors, including advanced age, parity, surgical history, and endometrial cyst characteristics (including 3 factors), on the possibility of malignant transformation, we performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 174 cases, 4 were diagnosed with malignant transformation, and these cases are reported. In the multivariate analysis, advanced age (P = 0.0064), nullipara (P = 0.0322), and enlargement (P = 0.0079) showed significant differences for malignant transformation occurrence. All 4 malignant transformation cases were among the 19 patients who had all of these 3 factors.

CONCLUSIONS

For a more accurate determination of the treatment approach, a larger sample size will be needed to determine the risk factors for malignant transformation during dienogest therapy.

Comparisons of the efficacy and recurrence of adenomyomectomy for severe uterine diffuse adenomyosis via laparotomy versus laparoscopy: a long-term result in a single institution

Purpose

Studies have shown that adenomyomectomy can effectively treat women with adenomyosis in a short period of time. However, the long-term efficacy of adenomyomectomy has rarely been reported. The objective of this study was to determine whether laparotomy is superior to laparoscopic surgery in the long-term efficacy of double-flap method adenomyomectomy for severe diffuse adenomyosis.

Methods

Between March 2011 and September 2018, a total of 148 patients with severe uterine diffuse adenomyosis who underwent laparoscopic (group A, n=72) and laparotomic (group B, n=76) double-flap adenomyomectomy were recruited. Adenomyomectomy efficacy and adenomyosis recurrence after surgery between groups A and B were comparatively analyzed.

Results

The effective rate at 6-year follow up after surgery was higher in group B (75.0%) than that in group A (62.1%), while the 6-year cumulative recurrence rate was higher in group A (27.8%) than that in group B (17.1%), but the differences did not reach statistical significance between the two groups (P>0.05). The recurrence rate was lower in patients who were treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) plus Mirena or oral contraceptives post-surgically than that in patients who were treated with only GnRHa post-surgically in groups A (51.6% vs 9.8%, P<0.01) and B (33.3% vs 6.5%, P<0.05). Moreover, the recurrence rate of adenomyosis patients with endometriosis was higher than that of adenomyosis patients without endometriosis in group A (55.0% vs 17.3%, P<0.05) and group B (36.0% vs 7.8%, P<0.05).

Conclusion

The long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and laparotomic double-flap adenomyomectomy can be achieved for severe diffuse uterine adenomyosis, but laparotomy seems to have advantages over laparoscopy. Postoperative drug use may be beneficial to reduce the recurrence of adenomyosis, especially for adenomyosis with endometriosis.