Sleep-disordered breathing in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a BMI-matched study

Validation of a sleep-disordered breathing screening questionnaire during pregnancy and comparison between mothers and bedpartners prediction of risk

BACKGROUND

Sleep Disorder Breathing (SDB) in pregnant patients ranges from 3 to 27% and varies depending on gestational age and method used to diagnose. SDB increases the risk of advanced pregnancy complications such as gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and preeclampsia. Screening and diagnosis of SDB during pregnancy remains a challenge, with existing screening tools underperforming during pregnancy. This study aimed to validate a previously developed model for predicting SDB during late pregnancy and compare the predictive value of bedpartner responses.

METHODS

Ninety-six women in the third trimester of pregnancy underwent polysomnography and completed the Berlin Questionnaire (BQ), with 81 bedpartners completing the BQ about their pregnant partner. A subset of BQ items (snoring volume and tiredness upon awakening) along with BMI > 32 kg/m2 was utilised to calculate the Wilson Optimized Model (WOM), which demonstrated strong predictive properties in development.

RESULTS

SDB (RDI/hr ≥ 5) was detected in 43.8% of women. BQ identified 72% of pregnant mothers as high risk for SDB (Sensitivity = 83%, Specificity = 37%), compared to 29% of mothers identified by the WOM (Sensitivity = 45%, Specificity = 83%). At RDI of ≥ 15, the WOM correctly classified more women according to SDB risk than the BQ (76.0% vs. 41.7% cases correct, X2(1) = 23.42, p < .001), with no difference at RDI ≥ 5. Bedpartners were more likely to report high risk for SDB on the WOM than pregnant women themselves (38.3% vs. 28.4%), however predictive ability was not improved by bedpartner input (RDI ≥ 5 bedpartner AUC = 0.69 v mother AUC = 0.73).

CONCLUSION

BQ largely overestimates the prevalence of SDB in pregnancy compared to the WOM which underestimates. Utilising bedpartner responses didn't improve screening for SDB in late pregnancy. More work is needed to develop a pregnancy-specific tool for quick and accurate screening for SDB.

Application of Music Therapy in Improving Sleep Quality and Psychological Health of Pregnant Women with Hypertension: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to retrospectively study the effect of music therapy on sleep quality and mental health level of pregnant women with hypertension in pregnancy (HIP).

METHODS

A total of 188 pregnant women with gestational hypertension admitted to The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang from January 2022 to January 2023 were selected as the research objects. Based on various management methods documented in the medical record system, the individuals were divided into a control group (n = 88, routine management) and an observation group (n = 100, routine management + music therapy). The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

No significant difference in the STAI and AIS scores before treatment was found between the two groups on admission (P > 0.05). The AIS and STAI scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group 2 days after delivery (P < 0.05). The total incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the observation group (8.00%) was lower than that in the control group (11.37%), but no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of music therapy for patients with HIP can alleviate their negative emotions to a certain extent and can improve sleep, offering certain clinical promotion value.

Eye-mask and earplugs compared with sleep advice leaflet to improve night sleep duration in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate at-home use of eye-mask and earplugs (EMEP) versus sleep hygiene advice leaflet (AL) on actigraphy-derived night sleep duration in sleep-deprived pregnant women.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the antenatal clinic of University Malaya Medical Centre from June 2021 to June 2022. Women at 34-36 weeks gestation with self-reported night sleep duration ≤6 hours were recruited. Participants wore an actigraphy device at night for seven consecutive nights (Observation/Baseline week). Only women whose actigraphy-derived night sleep duration was confirmed to be ≤360 minutes were randomized to use EMEP or AL. Actigraphy was continued for another week (Intervention week). Primary outcome was change in actigraphy-derived night sleep duration from observation to intervention week across trial arms. Secondary outcomes include participants' sleep quality, labor, and neonatal outcome. Comparisons were by Student t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-square test.

RESULTS

A total of 210 women were randomized: 105 each to EMEP and AL. The increase in night sleep duration over baseline was significantly longer with both EMEP (mean ± SD) 23 ± 41 minutes, p < .001, and AL 10 ± 35 minutes, p = .007. Night sleep duration was longer by 12.9 (95% CI = 2.2 to 23.7) minutes, p = .019 with EMEP over AL. Sleep quality (Global Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score) was significantly improved with EMEP (mean ± SD) -2.0 ± 2.5, p < .001, but not with AL -0.3 ± 2.2, p = .246. Labor and neonatal outcomes were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

EMEP significantly lengthened night sleep duration in sleep-deprived women in late pregnancy and is superior to AL.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

"Use of eye masks and earplugs compared with standard advice to improve sleep in pregnancy". https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN19061849. Registered with ISRCTN on 07 May 2021, trial identification number: ISRCTN19061849.

Common sleep disorders in pregnancy: a review

In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of common sleep disorders during pregnancy, including their characterization, prevalence, risk factors, and possible contribution to maternal and fetal outcomes. We conducted a quasi-systematic literature search of the MEDLINE database and identified 744 studies from 1991 through 2021, inclusive, that met our inclusion criteria. We synthesized the existing literature on sleep disorders during pregnancy and highlighted controversies, research gaps, and needed clinical developments. Our review covers a range of sleep disorders, including insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, restless legs syndrome, and circadian rhythm disorders. We discuss the prevalence of these disorders in pregnancy and their potential impact on maternal and fetal health outcomes. We also explore the relationship between sleep disorders, pre-pregnancy comorbidities such as obesity, and pregnancy-related conditions such as gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia. In addition to summarizing the existing literature on sleep disorders during pregnancy, we also highlight opportunities for further research in this area. We suggest that future studies should strive to employ validated and objective measurement tools for sleep disorders and prioritize utilization of longitudinal methods with participant follow-up through postpartum, mid-life, menopause, and beyond. We also put forward investigation into the impact of circadian rhythm disruption on reproductive physiology and early pregnancy outcomes as an area of important work. Overall, our review provides valuable insights on sleep and reproduction and into common sleep disorders during pregnancy and their potential impact on maternal and fetal health outcomes.

Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Consensus Guideline on the Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnancy

The Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology tasked an expert group to review existing evidence and to generate recommendations on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea during pregnancy. These recommendations are based on a systematic review of the available scientific evidence and expert opinion when scientific evidence is lacking. This guideline may not be appropriate for all clinical situations and patients, and physicians must decide whether these recommendations are appropriate for their patients on an individual basis. We recognize that not all pregnant people may identify as women. However, data on non-cisgendered pregnant patients are lacking, and many published studies use gender-binary terms; therefore, depending on the study referenced, we may refer to pregnant individuals as women. This guideline may inform the creation of clinical protocols by individual institutions that consider the unique considerations of their patient populations and the available resources.

Eye-masks and earplugs compared to headband in nulliparas on increasing spontaneous vaginal delivery: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

A majority of pregnant women experience sleep disruption during pregnancy, especially in the third trimester. Lack of sleep is associated with preterm birth, prolonged labor and higher cesarean section rate. Six or less hours of night sleep in the last month of pregnancy is associated with a higher rate of caesarean births. Eye-masks and earplugs compared to headband improve night sleep by 30 or more minutes. We sought to evaluate eye-mask and earplugs compared to sham/placebo headbands on spontaneous vaginal delivery.

METHODS

This randomized trial was conducted from December 2019-June 2020. 234 nulliparas, 34-36 weeks' gestation with self-reported night sleep < 6 h were randomized to eye-mask and earplugs or sham/placebo headband (both characterized as sleep aids) to be worn each night to delivery. After two weeks, interim outcome data of the average night sleep duration and the trial sleep related questionnaire was answered through the telephone.

RESULTS

Spontaneous vaginal delivery rates were 60/117(51.3%) vs. 52/117(44.4%) RR 1.15 95% CI 0.88-1.51 P = 0.30 for eye-mask and earplugs or headband respectively. At 2-weeks into the intervention period, the eye-mask and earplugs arm reported longer night sleep duration 7.0 ± 1.2 vs. 6.6 ± 1.5 h P = 0.04, expressed increased satisfaction with the allocated aid 7[6.0-8.0] vs. 6[5.0-7.5] P < 0.001, agreed they slept better 87/117(74.4%) vs. 48/117(41.0%) RR 1.81 95% CI 1.42-2.30 NNT_b 4 (2.2-4.7) P < 0.001 and higher compliance median[interquartile range] 5[3-7] vs. 4[ 2-5] times per week of sleep aid use P = 0.002.

CONCLUSION

Eye-mask and earplugs use at home in late third trimester do not increase the spontaneous vaginal delivery rate even though self-reported night sleep duration, sleep quality, satisfaction and compliance with allocated sleep aid were significantly better than for sham/placebo headband. Trial registration This trial was registered with ISRCTN on June 11, 2019 with trial identification number: ISRCTN99834087 .

Nasal Blockage and Academic Performance Among Medical College Students in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Objectives The most frequent otolaryngological complaint is nasal obstruction. We aimed to determine if there is a relationship between nasal blockage and academic performance among medical college students in Saudi Arabia. Methods This cross-sectional survey carried out from August to December 2022, included 860 medical students determining the risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on the participants using the Berlin Sleep Questionnaire Risk Probability, then comparing it to their socio-demographic characteristics, while the Chi-square test was used for the comparison of categorical variables. Result The average age of the participants in our study was 21.52 years; 60% were females and 40% were males. The risk of obstructive sleep apnea was found to be two times higher in females than in males (95% CI: 1.195- 3.345; p-value 0.008). The hypertensive participants had a 27-fold increased risk of OSA compared to non-hypertensives. Grade Point Average (GPA) and snoring had a statistically significant relationship, however, a fifth of the participants reported snoring (79.8% reported not snoring). We also found that 14.8% of the participants with snoring had a GPA between 2-4.49 compared to 44.6% of participants without snoring. Conclusion Female students had a two-fold higher chance of developing OSA than males. While a GPA of 4.5 and above was more often associated with participants without snoring, the number of individuals with a GPA of 2-4.49 was greater among participants with snoring. To aid in the prevention of illness complications and the management of risk factors, additional efforts should be made to increase disease knowledge among students, primary healthcare practitioners, and specialty doctors.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Is Associated With Late-Onset Preeclampsia in Overweight Pregnant Women in Korea

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is closely related to maternal obesity in pregnant women, and the association increases with later pregnancy. Obesity and OSA are risk factors of pregnancy-related complications, including gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and fetal morbidities. We aimed to determine the prevalence of OSA and to assess the impact of OSA on pregnancy-related disorders in overweight pregnant women.

METHODS

Eligible participants who were overweight [body mass index (BMI) ≥ 23 kg/m²] in gestational age 30 weeks or more, assessed OSA using a portable polysomnography at home. Clinical data were collected from pregnant women and their babies.

RESULTS

The average age of 51 participants was 34.5 years (27-44 years). The number of primipara was 25 (49%) and that of multipara was 26 (51%). Eight cases of GDM (15.7%) and five cases of preeclampsia (9.8%) were reported, and six patients (11.8%) experienced preterm delivery. In results of polysomnography, 14 patients (27.5%) were diagnosed as OSA. Apnea-hypopnea index moderately correlated with BMI (r = 0.515, P < 0.001). The BMI (P < 0.005) and preeclampsia rate (P < 0.017) were higher in the OSA group compared to the control group. Odds ratios (ORs) adjusting age, BMI, parity, and abortion history were calculated. The presence of OSA increased OR of preeclampsia (OR, 13.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-171.3). The majority of preeclampsia patients (4/5, 80%) underwent preterm delivery.

CONCLUSION

OSA is an important risk factor for preeclampsia, resulting in preterm delivery. For overweight pregnant women, an OSA evaluation should be mandatory.

Sleep disordered breathing and the risk of severe maternal morbidity in women with preeclampsia: A population-based study

OBJECTIVE

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may exacerbate the widespread endothelial dysfunction seen in preeclampsia, potentially worsening clinical outcomes. We aimed to assess whether OSA is associated with an increased risk of severe maternal morbidity, cardiovascular morbidity, and healthcare utilization among women with preeclampsia.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the National Perinatal Information Center (2010-2014) in the United States.The cohort comprised women with preeclampsia. We estimated the association between OSA and the outcomes using logistic regression analyses and determined odds ratio adjusted for demographic factors and comorbidities (ORadj) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was a composite of mortality and severe maternal morbidity comprising intensive care unit (ICU) admission, acute renal failure, pulmonary edema, pulmonary embolism, congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and stroke. Secondary outcomes comprised the subset of cardiovascular events, as well as increased healthcare utilization (including Cesarean delivery, preterm birth, ICU admission, and prolonged length of hospital stay).

RESULTS

In total, 71,159 women had preeclampsia, including 270 (0.4 %) with OSA. Women with preeclampsia and OSA were more likely to experience severe maternal morbidity than women without OSA (ORadj 2.65, 95 % CI [1.94-3.61]). Moreover, women with concomitant OSA had more severe cardiovascular morbidity than women without OSA (ORadj 5.05, 95 % CI [2.28-11.17]). Accordingly, OSA was associated with increased healthcare utilization in women with preeclampsia (ORadj. 2.26, 95 % CI [1.45-3.52]).

CONCLUSION

In women with preeclampsia, OSA increases the risk for severe maternal morbidity, cardiovascular morbidity, and healthcare utilization.

Eye Masks and Earplugs to Improve Night Sleep Duration in Nulliparas: A Randomized Trial

Background Women experience significant sleep disruption throughout pregnancy. Lack of sleep during the last month of pregnancy is associated with longer labor, a higher rate of Cesarean births, gestational diabetes, hypertension, and preterm birth. Eye-mask and earplugs through sensory deprivation increase sleep duration and quality in patients in the intensive care environment but their impact at home or during pregnancy is not known. We sought to evaluate eye-mask and earplugs compared to sham/placebo headbands on night sleep duration in pregnancy. Materials and methods A randomized trial was performed in a university hospital in Malaysia. Nulliparas between 34 and 36 weeks of gestation with self-reported night sleep of fewer than six hours were randomized to the use of eye-mask and earplugs or "sham" headbands during night sleep (both introduced as sleep aids). Night sleep duration was measured through a wrist actigraphy monitor during non-intervention week one and intervention week two with the allocated sleep aid. Results Data from 56 participants were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Mean night sleep duration increased in intervention week two compared to non-intervention week one in both trial arms, which were 279 ± 19 vs. 304 ± 19 minutes (mean increase of 25 minutes) p = <0.001 and 286 ± 21 vs. 302 ± 22 minutes (mean increase of 16 minutes) p = <0.001 for eye-masks-earplugs and headband respectively. However, the mean increase in night sleep duration across trial arms (p=0.13) was not significant. A higher proportion of participants in the eye-masks and earplugs arm had their night sleep duration increased by at least 30 minutes, 13/29 (45%) vs. 5/26 (19%), relative risk (RR) 2.3 (95% CI 1.0-5.6) p = 0.04, more likely to agree that they slept better 19/29 (66%) vs. 7/27 (26%), RR 2.2 (95% CI 1.1-4.6) p = 0.03, expressed higher satisfaction score with their sleep aid 7 (7.0-7.5) vs. 6 (5-7), p = 0.003 and had lower induction of labor rates 4/29 (14%) vs. 12/27 (44%), RR 0.3 (95%CI 0.1-0.8) p = 0.02. Conclusion Eye masks and earplugs use in nulliparas with short night sleep duration in late pregnancy, lengthen their night sleep duration over baseline. Sleep is reportedly better and maternal satisfaction is higher with eye masks and earplugs use.

Association between obstructive sleep apnea and cardiovascular diseases

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common respiratory disorder characterized by partial obstruction of upper respiratory tract and repetitive cessation of breathing during sleep. The etiology behind OSA is associated with the occurrence of intermittent hypoxemia, recurrent arousals and intrathoracic pressure swings. These contributing factors may turn on various signaling mechanisms including elevated sympathetic tone, oxidative stress, inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, cardiovascular variability, abnormal coagulation and metabolic defect ( e.g., insulin resistance, leptin resistance and altered hepatic metabolism). Given its close tie with major cardiovascular risk factors, OSA is commonly linked to the pathogenesis of a wide array of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) including hypertension, heart failure, arrhythmias, coronary artery disease, stroke, cerebrovascular disease and pulmonary hypertension (PH). The current standard treatment for OSA using adequate nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) confers a significant reduction in cardiovascular morbidity. Nonetheless, despite the availability of effective therapy, patients with CVDs are still deemed highly vulnerable to OSA and related adverse clinical outcomes. A better understanding of the etiology of OSA along with early diagnosis should be essential for this undertreated disorder in the clinical setting.

Obstructive sleep apnea in pregnant women

The prevalence of OSA in the low-risk obstetric population is thought to be low; best estimates have been extrapolated from the one available large prospective study and likely range between 3–8%.1 OSA prevalence in high-risk pregnant women such as those with obesity and chronic hypertension is significantly higher as extrapolated from several smaller prospective studies which have reported a prevalence as high as 37% in obese women.2 –6 Despite the high prevalence of OSA in high-risk pregnant women, it remains underdiagnosed due to several factors.

An emerging body of literature suggests that OSA may also have serious implications for the health of mothers and fetuses during and beyond pregnancy, but there is still no data to determine if OSA treatment mitigates these adverse outcomes. In this review, we will examine this body of literature from the perspective of the anesthesiologist: the association between pregnancy and the development or worsening of OSA; OSA as it relates to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes; antepartum and screening considerations for OSA in pregnant women; and recommendations regarding the peripartum management of OSA.

A Review of the Associations Between Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Possible Mechanisms of Disease

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) usually leads to the occurrence of diabetes. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common gestational complication associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Increasing studies suggest that women with OSA during pregnancy may be at a significantly greater risk of developing GDM. It is crucial to explore the association between OSA and GDM and the mechanisms underlying this association. In this review, we presented a comprehensive literature review of the following: the association between OSA and GDM, the possible mechanisms of this association, and the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on OSA with GDM. The results showed that most authors suggested that there was an association between OSA and GDM. The intermittent hypoxemia (IH) and reduction of slow-wave sleep (SWS) may be the key to this association. IH induces the products of oxidative stress and inflammation as well as dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal, which lead to diabetes. In addition, SWS reduction in OSA enhances the inflammation by increasing the inflammatory cytokines, increases the sympathetic activation, and causes changes in leptin level, which result in the development of GDM. Additionally, whether CPAP is beneficial to GDM remains still unclear.

Polysomnographic analysis of maternal sleep position and its relationship to pregnancy complications and sleep-disordered breathing

Links between supine "going to sleep" position and stillbirth risk have led to campaigns regarding safe maternal sleep position. This study profiles the distribution of sleep positions overnight and relationships to sleep onset position during pregnancy, and the relationships between supine sleep, sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), and pregnancy outcomes. Data from three prospective cohort studies evaluating SDB in healthy and complicated pregnancies were pooled. All participants underwent one night of polysomnography in late pregnancy and birth outcome data were collected. 187 women underwent polysomnography at a median gestation of 34 weeks'. The left lateral position was preferred for falling asleep (52%) compared to supine (14%), but sleep onset position was the dominant sleep position overnight in only half (54%) of women. The median percentage of sleep time in the supine position was 24.2%; women who fell asleep supine spent more time supine overnight compared to those who began non-supine (48.0% (30.0,65.9) vs. 22.6% (5.7,32.2), p < .001). Women with growth-restricted fetuses were more likely to fall asleep supine than those with well-grown fetuses (36.6% vs. 7.5%, p < .001). Positional SDB was observed in 46% of those with an RDI ≥ 5. Sleep onset position was the dominant position overnight for half of the sample, suggesting that sleep onset position is not always a reliable indicator of body position overnight. Supine sleep was related to fetal growth restriction and birthweight at delivery, though causality cannot be inferred. It is critical that we pursue research into verifying the important relationship between supine sleep and increased stillbirth risk, and the mechanisms behind it.

Association and Risk Factors for Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a serious, potentially life-threatening condition. Epidemiologic studies show that sleep apnea increases cardiovascular diseases risk factors including hypertension, obesity, and diabetes mellitus. OSA is also responsible for serious illnesses such as congestive heart failure, stroke, arrhythmias, and bronchial asthma. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate evidence for the association between OSA and cardiovascular disease morbidities and identify risk factors for the conditions. In a review of 34 studies conducted in 28 countries with a sample of 37,599 people, several comorbidities were identified in patients with severe OSA—these were: heart disease, stroke, kidney disease, asthma, COPD, acute heart failure, chronic heart failure, hyperlipidemia, thyroid disease, cerebral infarct or embolism, myocardial infarction, and psychological comorbidities including stress and depression. Important risk factors contributing to OSA included: age > 35 years; BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²; alcoholism; higher Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS); mean apnea duration; oxygen desaturation index (ODI); and nocturnal oxygen desaturation (NOD). Severe OSA (AHI ≥ 30) was significantly associated with excessive daytime sleepiness and oxygen desaturation index. The risk of OSA and associated disease morbidities can be reduced by controlling overweight/obesity, alcoholism, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia.

The effect of continuous positive airway pressure treatment on hypertensive disorder in pregnant women with obstructive sleep apnea

PURPOSE

Our study aimed to determine the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on the incidence and severity of hypertensive syndrome in pregnancy.

METHODS

The study included women with high-risk pregnancies and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale score ≥ of 10. Polygraphic testing was done between 18 and 20 weeks. Participants were divided into three groups: pregnant women with OSA starting treatment with CPAP for 4 weeks between 24 and 28 gestational weeks, women with OSA treated conservatively, and women without OSA as the control group. Participants were followed up regularly for 4 weeks until the delivery and 1 week after for the occurrence of hypertensive syndrome and other maternal complications.

RESULTS

Among the 110 women enrolled in the study, the prevalence of hypertensive syndrome in 41 pregnant women with OSA treated conservatively was 39%, 50 women with OSA treated with CPAP 26%, and 19 women in the control group 21%, p = 0.1. The group treated with CPAP when compared with the conservatively treated group had a significantly lower incidence of severe forms of hypertensive syndrome (8% vs. 24%, p = 0.02.), and after 1 month of treatment had higher night oxygen saturation (92%, vs. 87%, p = 0.003) and lower Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (respectively, 4.2 ± 2.3 vs. 9.4 ± 4.1, p < 0001). The respiratory event index was significantly associated with hypertension severity (patients with preeclampsia 9.5 ± 4.9 vs. without hypertension 6.9 ± 4.5, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

CPAP therapy significantly reduced the incidence of severe forms of hypertensive syndrome in pregnant women with OSA.

Snoring and depression symptoms in pregnant women

OBJECTIVE

Pregnant patients are vulnerable to both depression and sleep-disordered breathing, and both convey risks for maternal and fetal outcomes. Previous research has indicated that sleep-disordered breathing is associated with depression, but further information related to the risk of depression based on timing of onset of snoring is needed.

DESIGN

When presenting to clinic for their initial prenatal visit, pregnant patients completed a packet of questionnaires, which included measures related to depression (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale) and snoring. Habitual snoring was defined as snoring 3 or more nights per week.

RESULTS

In total, 1367 women were included and 34.1% reported habitual snoring, either chronic (24.4%) or pregnancy-onset (9.8%), with increased frequency of pregnancy-onset habitual snoring in later stages of pregnancy. Unadjusted analyses suggested increased odds of depressive symptoms in chronic and pregnancy-onset habitual snoring groups relative to nonsnorers (odds ratio [OR]: 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39, 2.92, P < .01; OR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.54, 4.07, P < .01, respectively). These findings were maintained after adjusting for maternal age, marital status, gestational age, and parity (chronic habitual snoring OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.14, 2.53, P < .01; pregnancy-onset habitual snoring OR: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.35, 5.78, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal snoring may be a risk factor for prenatal depressive symptoms. Pregnancy-onset habitual snoring confers additional risk for depression compared to not snoring during pregnancy.

Sleep disturbances during pregnancy and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sleep disturbances are highly prevalent in pregnancy and are frequently overlooked as a potential cause of significant morbidity. The association between sleep disturbances and pregnancy outcomes remains largely controversial and needs to be clarified to guide management. To evaluate the association between sleep disturbances and maternal complications and adverse fetal outcomes, we performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for English-language articles published from inception to March 6, 2020, including observational studies of pregnant women with and without sleep disturbances assessing the risk of obstetric complications in the antenatal, intrapartum or postnatal period, and neonatal complications. Data extraction was completed independently by two reviewers. We utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa Scales to assess the methodological quality of included studies and random-effect models to pool the associations. A total of 120 studies with 58,123,250 pregnant women were included. Sleep disturbances were assessed, including poor sleep quality, extreme sleep duration, insomnia symptoms, restless legs syndrome, subjective sleep-disordered breathing and diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea. Significant associations were found between sleep disturbances in pregnancy and a variety of maternal complications and adverse fetal outcomes. Overall sleep disturbances were significantly associated with pre-eclampsia (odds ratio = 2.80, 95% confidence interval: 2.38-3.30), gestational hypertension (1.74, 1.54-1.97), gestational diabetes mellitus (1.59, 1.45-1.76), cesarean section (1.47, 1.31-1.64), preterm birth (1.38, 1.26-1.51), large for gestational age (1.40, 1.11-1.77), and stillbirth (1.25, 1.08-1.45), but not small for gestational age (1.03, 0.92-1.16), or low birth weight (1.27, 0.98-1.64). Sleep disturbances were related to higher morbidities in pregnant women who are 30 y or older and overweight before pregnancy. The findings indicate that sleep disturbances, which are easily ignored and treatable for both pregnant women and clinical services, deserve more attention from health care providers during prenatal counseling and health care services.

The effect of body position on maternal cardiovascular function during sleep and wakefulness in late pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

An association between the increased risk of late stillbirth and the maternal supine sleeping position has been recently established. The risk of stillbirth following supine sleep has been suspected to occur as a result of aortocaval compression by the gravid uterus. A number of studies conducted during wakefulness have reported compromised cardiovascular function during supine rest, as demonstrated by reductions in cardiac output, blood pressure and utero-placental blood flow. It remains unclear whether similar effects are also present during sleep, due to the presence of key sleep-specific changes in cardiovascular function.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the changes in maternal cardiovascular function between the supine and left-lateral positions during wakefulness and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep in late pregnancy.

METHODS

Twenty-nine women with a singleton pregnancy between 24.7 and 36.7 weeks' gestation participated in a single overnight sleep study. Physiological measures (blood pressure, heart rate, heart rate variability - HRV, and pulse arrival time - PAT) were measured and recorded throughout the night using standard polysomnography equipment and the Portapres Model-2 device. As the present study evaluated cardiovascular changes during natural rest and sleep in pregnancy, participants were not given explicit instructions on which position to adopt. Body position was continuously recorded using a position monitor and verified with video recording.

RESULTS

No changes in systolic, diastolic or mean arterial blood pressure were observed between the left-lateral and supine positions during wakefulness or sleep. However, heart rate was significantly higher in the supine position compared to the left during wakefulness (p= .03), with a similar trend present during sleep (p= .11). A significantly shorter PAT was measured in the supine position (compared to the left) during wakefulness (p= .01) and sleep (p= .01). No change in HRV measures was observed between the left and supine positions in either state.

CONCLUSION

Blood pressure did not appear to differ significantly between the left-lateral and supine positions during wakefulness and sleep. The lack of blood pressure differences may reflect elevated sympathetic activity during rest and sleep in the supine position (compared to the left), suggesting that some degree of compensation for aortocaval compression may still be possible during sleep.

Associations Between Sleep Disorders and Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Materno-fetal Consequences

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

To review the data supporting the associations between sleep disorders and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, their diagnosis, consequences, treatment, and potential mechanisms.

RECENT FINDINGS

The prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing, insomnia, and restless legs syndrome increases as pregnancy progresses secondary to physiologic changes associated with pregnancy. Sleep-disordered breathing is strongly associated with the development of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia, both of which are associated with increased risk of perinatal complications. Diagnosing sleep disorders in pregnant presents added challenges, but polysomnography remains the gold standard for diagnosing sleep-disordered breathing in this group. Sleep disorders, and especially sleep-disordered breathing, are highly prevalent among pregnant women and associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Clinicians should be mindful of this association and endeavor to identify at-risk women for further evaluation.

Sleep-disordered breathing does not impact maternal outcomes in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

Objective

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is characterised by intermittent hypoxemia, sympathetic activation and widespread endothelial dysfunction, sharing pathophysiologic features with the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. We sought to determine whether coexisting SDB would adversely impact the outcomes of women with gestational hypertension (GH) and preeclampsia (PE), and healthy matched controls.

Study design

Women diagnosed with GH or PE along with BMI- and gestation-matched normotensive controls underwent polysomnography in late pregnancy to establish the presence or absence of SDB (RDI ≥ 5). Clinical outcomes of hypertensive disease severity were compared between groups, and venous blood samples were taken in the third trimester and at delivery to examine for any impact of SDB on the anti-angiogenic markers of PE.

Results

Data was available for 17 women with PE, 24 women with GH and 44 controls. SDB was diagnosed in 41% of the PE group, 63% of the GH group and 39% of the control group. Women with PE and co-existing SDB did not have worse outcomes in terms of gestation at diagnosis of PE (SDB = 29.1 (25.9, 32.1) weeks vs. no SDB = 32.0 (29.0, 33.9), p = n.s.) and days between diagnosis of PE and delivery (SDB = 20.0 (4.0, 35.0) days vs. no SDB = 10.5 (9.0, 14.0), p = n.s.). There were also no differences in severity of hypertension, antihypertensive treatment and biochemical, haematological and anti-angiogenic markers of PE between SDB and no SDB groups. Similar results were observed among women with GH. Healthy control women with SDB were no more likely to develop a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy in the later stages of pregnancy (SDB = 5.9% vs. no SDB = 7.4%, p = n.s.). Increasing the threshold for diagnosis of SDB to RDI ≥ 15 did not unmask a worse prognosis.

Conclusion

The presence of SDB during pregnancy did not worsen the disease course of GH or PE, and was not associated with high blood pressure or anti-angiogenic markers of hypertensive disease amongst healthy pregnant women. Given the numerous reports of the relationship between SDB and diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, it appears more work is required to distinguish causal, versus confounding, pathways.

Sleep Disordered Breathing, a Novel, Modifiable Risk Factor for Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pathophysiology of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), especially preeclampsia, has not been fully elucidated. Most trials aimed at the prevention of preeclampsia have failed to show significant benefit and investigation of novel, modifiable risk factors is sorely needed. Sleep disordered breathing (SDB), a group of disorders for which treatments are available, meets these criteria. SDB impacts about a third of all pregnancies and is associated with hypertension in the general non-pregnant population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have shown a high prevalence of SDB, especially in complicated pregnancies. Several studies have shown that pregnant women with SDB have a higher risk for developing HDP, and these two disorders are associated with similar maternal long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Based on limited animal models of gestational intermittent hypoxia and human studies, SDB and HDP share similar risk factors and some pathophysiological mechanisms. However, there is paucity of studies addressing causality of this association and identifying therapeutic targets for intervention. Maternal SDB represents a novel and modifiable risk factor of HDP. Further studies are needed in order to establish the exact mechanisms underlying this association and to identify specific areas for clinical interventions.

The presence of coexisting sleep-disordered breathing among women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy does not worsen perinatal outcome

Objective

To determine whether the presence of co-existing sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is associated with worse perinatal outcomes among women diagnosed with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP), compared with normotensive controls.

Study design

Women diagnosed with HDP (gestational hypertension or preeclampsia) and BMI- and gestation-matched controls underwent polysomnography in late pregnancy to determine if they had coexisting SDB. Fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring accompanied the sleep study, and third trimester fetal growth velocity was assessed using ultrasound. Cord blood was taken at delivery to measure key regulators of fetal growth.

Results

SDB was diagnosed in 52.5% of the HDP group (n = 40) and 38.1% of the control group (n = 42); p = .19. FHR decelerations were commonly observed during sleep, but the presence of SDB did not increase this risk in either the HDP or control group (HDP group—SDB = 35.3% vs. No SDB = 40.0%, p = 1.0; control group—SDB = 41.7% vs. No SDB = 25.0%, p = .44), nor did SDB affect the total number of decelerations overnight (HDP group—SDB = 2.7 ± 1.0 vs. No SDB = 2.8 ± 2.1, p = .94; control group—SDB = 2.0 ± 0.8 vs. No SDB = 2.0 ± 0.7, p = 1.0). Fetal growth restriction was the strongest predictor of fetal heart rate events during sleep (aOR 5.31 (95% CI 1.26–22.26), p = .02). The presence of SDB also did not adversely affect fetal growth; in fact among women with HDP, SDB was associated with significantly larger customised birthweight centiles (43.2% ± 38.3 vs. 16.2% ± 27.0, p = .015) and fewer growth restricted babies at birth (30% vs. 68.4%, p = .026) compared to HDP women without SDB. There was no impact of SDB on measures of fetal growth for the control group. Cord blood measures of fetal growth did not show any adverse effect among women with SDB, either in the HDP or control group.

Conclusion

We did not find that the presence of mild SDB worsened fetal acute or longitudinal outcomes, either among women with HDP or BMI-matched normotensive controls. Unexpectedly, we found the presence of SDB conferred a better prognosis in HDP in terms of fetal growth. The fetus has considerable adaptive capacity to withstand in utero hypoxia, which may explain our mostly negative findings. In addition, SDB in this cohort was mostly mild. It may be that fetal sequelae will only be unmasked in the setting of more severe degrees of SDB and/or underlying placental disease.

Effects of Exercise on Sleep Quality in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

Sleep quality was considered a priority concern facing pregnant women. Conventional wisdom argues that good sleep quality benefits pregnant women and their fetuses. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of a specific exercise program on the　sleep quality in pregnant women.

METHODS

Searches were executed in seven databases since their inceptions until February 28, 2019, for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of an exercise program on the sleep quality and insomnia in pregnant women. A random-effects model was applied for meta-analysis, and odds ratio, mean differences (MDs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are shown as parts of outcomes.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included for meta-analysis. Compared with their not-exercising counterparts, analyses showed that regularly exercising women had significantly enhanced sleep quality, with an odds ratio of 6.21 (95% CI, 2.02-19.11;p = .001; I² = 80.2%), with a standardized MD of -0.93 (95% CI, -1.19 to -0.67; p < .001; I² = 30.0%). However, exercising women showed no significant insomnia improvement, with an standardized MD of -2.85 (95% CI, -7.67 to 1.98; p = .250; I² = 97.0%), relative to their not-exercising counterparts.

CONCLUSION

This research indicated that exercise has a positive impact on the sleep quality of pregnant women. Despite the aforementioned positive impact on sleep quality, the present study did not find evidence to support that exercise may also improve insomnia for pregnant women.

Polysomnographic features of pregnancy: A systematic review

Symptoms of sleep disturbances are common among pregnant women and generally worsen across gestation. Pregnancy-related sleep disorders are not only associated with a poor quality of life of the affected mothers, but also with adverse perinatal outcomes, including perinatal depression, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and preterm birth. The current knowledge about the impact of sleep disorders during pregnancy largely derives from the results of sleep surveys conducted in various populations. However, the number of studies examining changes in objective sleep variables during pregnancy via polysomnography has progressively increased in recent years. Here we systematically reviewed the polysomnographic studies available in the literature with the aim to describe the sleep pattern and to identify possible markers of sleep disruption in pregnant women. Based on our analysis, subjective worsening of sleep quality across gestation is related to objective changes in sleep macrostructure, which become particularly evident in the third trimester. Pregnancy per se does not represent an independent risk factor for developing major polysomnography-assessed sleep disorders in otherwise healthy women. However, in women presenting predisposing factors, such as obesity or hypertension, physiological changes occurring during pregnancy may contribute to the onset of pathological conditions, especially sleep-disordered breathing, which must be carefully considered.

Socioeconomic Status in Pregnant Women and Sleep Quality During Pregnancy

This review focuses on factors contributing to sleep quality among pregnant women with low socioeconomic statuses during the third trimester of their pregnancy. Electronic searches were conducted, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched for published, peer reviewed, English language primary research articles using electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, MEDLINE and Google Scholar ending June 2019. All references were reviewed manually and independently by authors. After applying the inclusion criteria, 56 articles were selected; 38 of which are full-text and included in this review. All articles related to the analysis of poor sleep quality among uncomplicated pregnant women were included. Pregnant women with a specific pathology were excluded.

We found poor sleep quality among pregnant women is correlated with low socioeconomic levels. Pregnant women with lower incomes tend to have inadequate diets, which further complicates the health of the mother and the baby. External factors including low income, poor quality of life and poor diet tend to increase the possibility of future health complications in both mother and child, and can result in complications such as preterm labor, low birth weight, preeclampsia, perinatal death, and spontaneous abortion.

Pregnant pause: should we screen for sleep disordered breathing in pregnancy?

Physiological and hormonal changes in pregnancy can contribute towards sleep disordered breathing in pregnant women (SDBP). When present, SDBP increases the risk of several adverse maternal and fetal outcomes independent of factors such as age, weight and pre-existing maternal comorbidities. SDBP is underdiagnosed and may be hard to recognise because the presentation can be difficult to differentiate from normal pregnancy and the severity may change over the course of gestation. Timely intervention seems likely to help reduce adverse outcomes, but the relative benefits of intervention are still unclear. The definition of what constitutes a sleep-related breathing “disorder” in pregnancy may be different to the general population and so traditional thresholds for intervention may not be relevant in pregnancy. Any modifications to the disease definition in this group, or implementation of more intensive screening, may result in overdiagnosis. Further research is needed to help clinicians evaluate the balance of benefits and harms in this process. Until this is clearer there is a strong imperative for shared decision making in screening and treatment decisions, and screening programmes should be monitored to assess whether improved outcomes can be achieved at the healthcare system level.

Untreated sleep disordered breathing in pregnancy poses risks to maternal and fetal wellbeing, but thresholds for and effectiveness of intervention are unclear. Clinicians should use shared decision making for screening and treatment decisions.http://ow.ly/N0oN30noWnx