Short‐ and long‐term mortality following hypnotic use

Insomnia and risk of mortality in older adults

Existing evidence linking insomnia to all-cause mortality in older individuals remains inconclusive. We conducted a retrospective study of a large cohort of veterans aged 65-80 years old identified from the Corporate Data Warehouse, a large data repository derived from the Veterans Health Administration integrated medical records. Veterans' enrollees with and without International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, codes corresponding to insomnia diagnosis between 1 January 2010 and 30 March 2019 were assessed for eligibility. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. A total of 36,269 veterans, 9584 with insomnia and 26,685 without insomnia, were included in the analysis. Baseline mean (SD) age was 72.6 (4.2) years. During a mean follow-up of 6.0 (2.9) years of the propensity score matched sample, the mortality rate was 34.8 [95% confidence interval: 33.2-36.6] deaths per 1000 person-years among patients with insomnia compared with 27.8 [95% confidence interval: 26.6-29.1] among patients without insomnia. In a Cox proportional hazards model, insomnia was significantly associated with higher mortality (hazard ratio: 1.39; [95% confidence interval: 1.27-1.52]). Patients with insomnia also had a higher risk of non-fatal cardiovascular events (hazard ratio: 1.21; [95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.37]). Secondary stratified analyses by sex, race, ethnicity and hypertension showed no evidence of effect modification. A higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio: 1.51; [95% confidence interval: 1.33-1.71]) was observed when depression was present compared with absent (hazard ratio: 1.26; [95% confidence interval: 1.12-1.44]; p = 0.02). In this cohort study, insomnia was associated with increased risk-adjusted mortality and non-fatal cardiovascular events in older individuals.

The association of short and long sleep with mortality in men and women

Both short (< 6 hr) and long (> 8 hr) sleep are associated with increased mortality. We here investigated whether the association between sleep duration and all-cause, cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality differs between men and women. A cohort of 34,311 participants (mean age and standard deviation = 50.5 ± 15.5 years, 65% women), with detailed assessment of sleep at baseline and up to 20.5 years of follow-up (18 years for cause-specific mortality), was analysed using Cox proportional hazards model to estimate HRs with 95% confidence intervals. After adjustment for covariates, all-cause, cardiovascular disease and cancer mortalities were increased for both < 5 hr and ≥ 9 hr sleep durations (with 6 hr as reference). For all-cause mortality, women who slept < 5 hr had a hazard ratio = 1.54 (95% confidence interval = 1.32-1.80), while the corresponding hazard ratio was 1.05 (95% confidence interval = 0.88-1.27) for men, the interaction being significant (p < 0.05). For cardiovascular disease mortality, exclusion of the first 2 years of exposure, as well as competing risk analysis eliminated the originally significant interaction. Cancer mortality did not show any significant interaction. Survival analysis of the difference between the reference duration (6 hr) and the short duration (< 5 hr) during follow-up showed a gradually steeper reduction of survival time for women than for men for all-cause mortality. We also observed that the lowest cancer mortality appeared for the 5-hr sleep duration. In conclusion, the pattern of association between short sleep duration and all-cause mortality differed between women and men, and the difference between men and women increased with follow-up time.

Association Between Hypnotic Use and All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Insomnia

Purpose

Hypnotics are commonly prescribed in patients with COPD to manage insomnia. Given the considerable risks associated with these drugs, the aim of the study was to evaluate the risk of all-cause mortality associated with hypnotics in a cohort of veterans with COPD presenting with insomnia.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study that used Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse with data supplemented by linkage to Medicare, Medicaid, and National Death Index data from 2010 through 2019. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Analyses were conducted using propensity score 1:1 matching to balance baseline characteristics.

Results

Of the 5759 veterans with COPD (mean [SD] age, 71.7 [11.2]; 92% men), 3585 newly initiated hypnotic agents during the study period. During a mean follow-up of 7.4 (SD, 2.7) years, a total of 2301 deaths occurred, with 65.2 and 48.7 total deaths per 1000 person-years among hypnotic users and nonusers, respectively. After propensity matching, hypnotic use was associated with a 22% increased risk of mortality compared with hypnotic nonusers (hazard ratio [HR] 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI],1.11-1.35). The benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs) group experienced a higher incidence rate of all-cause mortality compared to hypnotic nonusers (Incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14-1.43). Conversely, the mortality rate of non-BZRA hypnotics decreased after the first 2 years and was not significantly different for hypnotic nonusers (IRR 1.04; 95% CI, 0.82-1.11).

Conclusion

Among patients with COPD and insomnia, treatment with hypnotics was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality. The association was observed in patients prescribed BZRAs. The risk of mortality for non-BZRAs moderated after the first 2 years, indicating a class effect.

The risk of major adverse cardiovascular events associated with the use of hypnotics in patients with insomnia

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether hypnotic use in patients with insomnia reduces major adverse cardiovascular events, including all-cause mortality and nonfatal major adverse cardiovascular events.

METHODS

Using the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 16,064 patients who were newly diagnosed with insomnia between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019. A pair of 3912 hypnotic users and nonusers were selected based on a 1:1 propensity score methodology. The primary outcome was extended major adverse cardiovascular events, a composite of the first occurrence of all-cause mortality or nonfatal major adverse cardiovascular events.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up of 4.8 years, a total of 2791 composite events occurred, including 2033 deaths and 762 nonfatal major adverse cardiovascular events. Although the incidence rates of major adverse cardiovascular events were comparable between hypnotic users and nonusers in the propensity-matched cohort, users of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.47 [95% CI, 1.17-1.88] and 1.20 [95% CI, 1.03-1.39], respectively), while serotonin antagonist and reuptake inhibitors users had a survival advantage (hazard ratio 0.79 [95% CI, 0.69-0.91]) compared with nonusers. There were no differences in the risk of nonfatal major adverse cardiovascular events between all classes of hypnotics. Male patients and those aged 60 years or younger who were using benzodiazepines or Z-drugs experienced higher major adverse cardiovascular events than their counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with newly diagnosed insomnia, treatment with hypnotics resulted in higher extended major adverse cardiovascular events but not nonfatal major adverse cardiovascular events with benzodiazepine and Z-drug users compared with nonusers. The use of serotonin antagonist and reuptake inhibitors agents had a protective effect against major adverse cardiovascular events warranting further investigation.

Management of chronic insomnia using hypnotics: a friend or a foe?

Epidemiological studies suggest that 10-15% adults meet the present criteria for the diagnosis of insomnia disorder; however, there may be geographical variations. Untreated insomnia disorders have a number of adverse health consequences in addition to economic burden caused by it. Available guidelines mention that CBT-I should be preferred over hypnotics. However, several patients of chronic insomnia are not candidate for CBT-I and for them, hypnotics are the only answer. This paper reviews the literature to answer following questions: What is the current understanding regarding place of hypnotics for in management of insomnia disorder? How many patients misuse or abuse hypnotics, especially benzodiazepines, as commonly believed? Do we have data from human studies regarding low-dose benzodiazepine dependence? What does hypnotics produce-withdrawal insomnia, rebound insomnia or end of dose phenomenon? Are adverse effects of benzodiazepines worse than other psychotropic medications? Is prescription of hypnotics more troublesome than untreated insomnia disorder? Available literature suggests that there is an unreasonable negative bias attached to the use of hypnotics. Only a sub-set of patients who are prescribed hypnotics, meet the criteria for "dependence" in long term. Other patients either discontinue it (as insomnia remits) or change to occasional use (since insomnia may be relapsing remitting disorder), or continue using it in low dose (since insomnia reappears as hypnotics are discontinued, similar to increase in blood sugar after hypoglycemics are discontinued). Meta-analysis shows that adverse effects of hypnotics are comparable to that of other psychotropic medications. Considering the consequences and risks associated with untreated insomnia disorder, even long-term use of hypnotics is justified, however with the careful watch that patients are not increasing the dose. This approach is especially important in geographical areas where trained CBT-I therapists are not available.

The association of hypnotics with incident cardiovascular disease and mortality in older women with sleep disturbances

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Insomnia is common in older women and is associated with higher cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Nonbenzodiazepine GABA agonists (Z-drugs) are the most commonly prescribed sleep aids. The study objective was to determine whether the use of Z-drugs is associated with the risk of developing CVD and mortality in older women with sleep disturbances.

PATIENTS/METHODS

The study cohort included post-menopausal women who, at baseline, scored ≥9 with the Women's Health Initiative Insomnia Rating Scale (N = 40,728). Members of the cohort were categorized as users of Z-drugs, users of other prescription hypnotics, or non-users. Outcomes were composite CVD (congestive heart failure, stroke, and fatal/non-fatal myocardial infarction) and mortality. Hazard ratios were estimated from Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for demographics, medical history, and sleep measures. To address potential confounding by indication, we also adjusted for propensity to be prescribed hypnotics.

RESULTS

The mean age of our cohort was 63.57 years (SD = 7.23) and mean follow-up time after the initial follow-up visit was 14.0 years (SD = 6.3). Z-drug use was significantly associated with an increased risk of composite CVD (HR = 1.35, 95%CI: 1.02-1.79) and all-cause mortality (HR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.13-1.69). When groups were divided by heavy and casual use, only heavy users (≥3 times per week) had an increased risk of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Z-drugs use was associated with an increased risk for death and CVD in post-menopausal women being treated for sleep disturbances. Additional research is needed to evaluate both frequency and duration of Z-drug use.