D-dimer to guide the intensity of anticoagulation in Chinese patients after mechanical heart valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial

Biochemical Analysis of Ferritin and D-dimer in COVID-19 Survivors and Non-survivors

Background COVID-19 is a major cause of illness and mortality. The management of COVID-19-related illnesses might change if variables connected to their severity and the requirement for ICU admission could be found. The severity of COVID-19 might be efficiently predicted with several laboratory measures, such as ferritin levels and D-dimer analysis. Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the association between serum D-dimer and ferritin levels and their effects on mortality in patients with COVID-19. Methods This retrospective observational study included all patients with positive real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results for COVID-19 who were hospitalized in the Ministry of Health South Al-Qunfudah General Hospital between March and September 30, 2020. Their laboratory parameters, serum D-dimer, and ferritin levels were evaluated. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) was used to analyze the data. Results A total of 318 COVID-19 patients were analyzed; 56.9% (n=181) were male and 43.1% (n=137) were female. Of these, 78.6% (n=250) survived, including 58% of men and 42% of women. The mean D-dimer was 2.1 mcg/mL (SD=3.16) and the mean ferritin was 698.59 ng/mL (SD=603.11). Non-recovered patients were substantially older (66.16 years old) and had higher D-dimer (5.46) mcg/mL and ferritin levels (992.96) ng/mL. Intubation length and gender did not affect survival. Of the non-survivors, 95.6% (n=239) were admitted to the ICU, and 50% (n=34) required mechanical ventilation. Conclusions COVID-19 infection mortality dramatically increased with older age and increased mean ferritin and plasma D-dimer values, which were significantly higher in COVID-19 non-survivors than in survivors. Therefore, assessing and monitoring these laboratory markers in the early stages of the disease may have a significant impact on preventing disease progression and death.

Social App to Improve Warfarin Therapy in Post-MHVR Chinese Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Poor anticoagulation quality was a major problem among warfarin-treated patients, which called for innovative and effective methods to improve it.

Objective

To investigate whether social app could be used to reduce warfarin-associated adverse events among post-MHVR Chinese patients.

Method

735 warfarin-treated patients (aged 50.8 ± 9.6 years, 59.9% female) were enrolled and randomized to a social app care group (warfarin therapy was guided by experienced clinicians via a social app) or a routine care group (warfarin therapy was managed through traditional in-office visits) at a 1 : 1 ratio. Ending points (bleeding and thrombotic events) were recorded during an 18-month follow-up period.

Results

A total of 718 patients were included in analysis. 57 of them suffered warfarin-associated adverse events, including 30 major bleedings and 27 thrombotic events. The time in the therapeutic range (TTR, Rosendaal method) in the social app group was 71.5%, which was significantly better than 52.6% in the routine care group (difference: 18.8%, 95% CI: 16.8-20.8). Compared with the patients from the social app group, patients under routine care experienced more bleeding (hazard ratio (HR): 2.31, 95% CI: 1.13-4.72). The social app care group had lower variation (0.55 vs. 0.70) in the international normalized ratio (INR) values and fewer incidents of extremely high INR (e.g., INR > 5.0, 0.87% vs. 3.42%) than the routine care group.

Conclusions

Social app management could significantly improve warfarin control and was associated with a reduction in bleeding risk. This trial was registered with NCT03264937.

D-dimer levels on admission to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with Covid-19

BACKGROUND

The outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) has shown a global spreading trend. Early and effective predictors of clinical outcomes are urgently needed to improve management of Covid-19 patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether elevated D-dimer levels could predict mortality in patients with Covid-19.

METHODS

Patients with laboratory confirmed Covid-19 were retrospective enrolled in Wuhan Asia General Hospital from January 12, 2020, to March 15, 2020. D-dimer levels on admission and death events were collected to calculate the optimum cutoff using receiver operating characteristic curves. According to the cutoff, the subjects were divided into two groups. Then the in-hospital mortality between two groups were compared to assess the predictive value of D-dimer level.

RESULTS

A total of 343 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. The optimum cutoff value of D-dimer to predict in-hospital mortality was 2.0 µg/mL with a sensitivity of 92.3% and a specificity of 83.3%. There were 67 patients with D-dimer ≥2.0 µg/mL, and 267 patients with D-dimer <2.0 µg/mL on admission. 13 deaths occurred during hospitalization. Patients with D-dimer levels ≥2.0 µg/mL had a higher incidence of mortality when comparing with those who with D-dimer levels <2.0 µg/mL (12/67 vs 1/267, P < .001; hazard ratio, 51.5; 95% confidence interval, 12.9-206.7).

CONCLUSIONS

D-dimer on admission greater than 2.0 µg/mL (fourfold increase) could effectively predict in-hospital mortality in patients with Covid-19, which indicated D-dimer could be an early and helpful marker to improve management of Covid-19 patients. (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2000031428).

The emerging value of serum D-dimer measurement in the work-up and management of ischemic stroke

Background

Elevated D-dimer levels are a marker of both thrombin formation and fibrinolysis. Currently D-dimer measurement is routinely used for ruling out venous thromboembolism and diagnosis/monitoring of disseminated intravascular coagulation. Recent emerging data suggest that D-dimer may become an important biomarker in ischemic stroke as well as in cardiovascular diseases.

Aims

To outline the clinical utility of D-dimer in work-up and management of ischemic stroke.

Summary

D-dimer measurement is most useful in stroke with active cancer as it can confirm etiologic diagnosis, predict recurrent stroke risk, and aid treatment decision in cancer-associated stroke. In cryptogenic stroke, high D-dimer levels can also provide clues for the cause of stroke as occult cancer and undetected cardiac embolic source as occult atrial fibrillation and may be helpful in treatment decision making of secondary stroke prevention. Serial D-dimer measurements should be further studied to monitor antithrombotic therapy effectiveness in both cardiogenic and cryptogenic etiologies.

Conclusion

Accumulating data suggests the utility of D-dimer test in the management of ischemic stroke, although the evidence is still limited. Future studies would clarify the role of D-dimer measurement in ischemic stroke.

Chinese Patients With Heart Valve Replacement Do Not Benefit From Warfarin Pharmacogenetic Testing on Anticoagulation Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Genotype-guided warfarin dosing has been shown in some randomized trials to improve anticoagulation outcomes in individuals of European ancestry; yet, its utility in Chinese patients with heart valve replacement remains unresolved.

METHODS

A total of 2264 patients who underwent heart valve replacement at Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups, namely, a genotype-guided and a traditional clinically guided warfarin dosing group. In the genotype-guided group (n = 1134), genotyping for CYP2C9 and VKORC1 (-1639 G→A) was performed using TaqMan genotyping assay. Warfarin doses were predicted with the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium algorithm. Patients in the control group (n = 1130) were clinically guided. The primary outcome was to compare the incidence of adverse events (major bleeding and thrombotic) during a 90-day follow-up period between 2 groups. Secondary objectives were to describe effects of the pharmacogenetic intervention on the first therapeutic-target-achieving time, the stable maintenance dose, and the hospitalization days.

RESULTS

A total of 2245 patients were included in the analysis. Forty-nine events occurred during follow-up. Genotype-guided dosing strategy did not result in a reduction in major bleeding (0.26% versus 0.63%; hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-1.53; P = 0.20) and thrombotic events (0.89% versus 1.61%; hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-1.17; P = 0.12) compared with clinical dosing group. Compared with traditional dosing, patients in the genotype-guided group reached their therapeutic international normalized ratio in a shorter time (3.8 ± 2.0 versus 4.4 ± 2.0 days, P < 0.001). There was no difference in hospitalization days (P = 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Warfarin pharmacogenetic testing according to the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium algorithm cannot improve anticoagulation outcomes in Chinese patients with heart valve replacement.

D-Dimer to Predict the Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valve Replacement During Oral Anticoagulation Therapy

Mechanical heart valve replacement (MHVR) entails lifetime oral anticoagulation to eliminate thrombosis. However, adverse events may still occur despite proper anticoagulation therapy. In this study, we investigated whether D-dimer can predict the clinical events in post-MHVR patients during oral anticoagulation therapy.This was a single-center, prospective study. In all, 772 patients who underwent MHVR in the Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital from January 2013 to May 2014 were screened. Patients were assigned to the abnormal D-dimer group and the normal D-dimer group according to the D-dimer levels measured 3 months after the beginning of the oral anticoagulation therapy regime. All patients were followed up for 24 months or until the observation of the endpoints, which included thrombotic events, bleeding events, and all-cause deaths.A total of 718 patients were included in the analysis: 91 had abnormal D-dimer levels, and 627 had normal D-dimer levels. In all, 53 events were observed during 24 months. Compared with the normal D-dimer group, patients with abnormal D-dimer levels had a higher incidence of thrombotic events (10 versus 14; hazard ratio (HR): 5.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.38-12.1; P < 0.001), all-cause mortality (8 versus 13; HR: 4.65; 95% CI: 1.93-11.2; P < 0.001), and a higher incidence of total events (16 versus 37; HR: 3.26; 95% CI: 1.81-5.86; P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in bleeding events (2 versus 21; HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.17-3.07; P = 0.66).D-dimer may be a useful marker to predict thrombotic events and all-cause deaths in post-MHVR patients during oral anticoagulation therapy (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01996657).

Use of D-dimer in oral anticoagulation therapy

Individualized anticoagulation management and improvement of the safety and effectiveness of oral anticoagulant have always been the focus of clinicians' attention. D-dimer, a sensitive marker of thrombosis and coagulation activation, is not only traditionally used in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism, acute aortic dissection, and disseminated intravascular coagulation but can also be used as a helpful marker in the management of oral anticoagulant, including evaluating the anticoagulation quality, predicting clinical outcomes, and determining the optimal duration and intensity of anticoagulation.