First evaluation of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of BAY 2433334, a small molecule targeting coagulation factor XIa

A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of asundexian: a novel factor XIa inhibitor for stroke prevention

INTRODUCTION

Antithrombotic therapy is the mainstay of ischemic stroke prevention. Current drugs (antiplatelets and oral anticoagulants) lead to increased bleeding risks, and the rates of stroke recurrence, despite antithrombotic therapy, are still elevated. There is a need for novel antithrombotic therapies with superior effectiveness but without increased bleeding risk. Factor XIa inhibitors might cover this gap.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript examines the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of asundexian and the current clinical evidence regarding its application in preventing ischemic stroke.

EXPERT OPINION

Asundexian shows a very favoring pharmacokinetic profile. Despite asundexian being inferior to apixaban for cardioembolic ischemic stroke, it could be useful in patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke. Although antiplatelet therapy is the recommended treatment to prevent non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke, adding an anticoagulant might have beneficial effects through the dual-pathway inhibition strategy. Due to the potential risk of hemorrhagic transformation, there is hesitation to administer anticoagulants early to patients who have recently had an ischemic stroke, especially if they are also on antiplatelet therapy. However, clinical trials on asundexian confirmed its safety for bleeding, even when used with antiplatelets. A phase 3 trial is currently investigating the efficacy of asundexian in preventing non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke.

Novel horizons in anticoagulation: the emerging role of factor XI inhibitors across different settings

Anticoagulants have long been fundamental in preventing and treating thromboembolic disorders, with a recent shift of focus towards direct oral anticoagulants, thanks to their ease of use, efficacy, and safety. Despite these advancements, bleeding complications remain a major concern with any anticoagulant, highlighting the need for safer drugs. Factor XI (FXI) inhibitors have emerged as promising agents in this regard, offering a novel approach by targeting upstream factors in the coagulation system. Phase II trials have shown encouraging outcomes, indicating a reduced bleeding risk compared to that associated with traditional anticoagulants, particularly in the context of cardiovascular disease management when combined with antiplatelet therapy. However, the variability in findings and limited efficacy data call for a cautious interpretation pending insights from phase III trials. These trials are essential for validating the potential of FXI inhibitors to balance bleeding risk reduction and maintain anticoagulant efficacy. This review explores the pharmacology, potential indications, clinical data, and future directions of FXI inhibitors, providing a perspective on their evolving role in anticoagulant therapy. It also provides a detailed analysis of data from published clinical trials on FXI inhibitors in various indications. Preliminary data from ongoing trials are also outlined. As the field moves forward, a cautiously optimistic outlook can be expected, focusing on comprehensive data from phase III trials to define the role of FXI inhibitors in various clinical scenarios.

Will Factor XI Inhibitors Replace Current Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides an overview of the factor XI (FXI) inhibitor hypothesis for the development of novel anticoagulants which may be safer to those currently used in clinical practice and describes preliminary clinical data from phase 2 dose-ranging studies of patients with atrial fibrillation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent data from phase 2 dose ranging studies demonstrate substantial reductions in bleeding with FXI pathway inhibition compared with currently approved anticoagulants. However, larger studies are necessary to demonstrate efficacy of FXI inhibition for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. FXI pathway inhibition holds great promise for revolutionizing the landscape of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation, primarily by reducing bleeding risk; however, further data are necessary to demonstrate efficacy.

Therapeutic Potential of FXI Inhibitors: Hype or Hope?

Significant advancements have shaped the landscape of anticoagulant therapy in the past two decades, including the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), characterized by favorable safety and efficacy profiles and reduced drug-to-drug or food interaction resulting in excellent patient compliance. However, residual concerns still exist with standard-of-care anticoagulant therapy, including the inability to use DOACs in several clinical settings and the need to further reduce the risk of bleeding. Recent improvements in the understanding of the mechanisms behind thrombus formation have led to the awareness that the intrinsic pathway of the coagulation cascade may play an important role in pathological thrombosis, but not in hemostasis. This has represented the rationale for targeting this pathway with factor XI (FXI) inhibitors, with the aim of uncoupling hemostasis and thrombosis. Clinical evidence from patients with FXI deficiency further supports this concept. A number of compounds with different mechanisms of action have been developed to target FXI (i.e., asundexian, abelacimab, Ionis-FXIRx, milvexian, osocimab, and Xisomab 3G). To date, the majority of available trials have not gone beyond completion of phase 2 and results are conflictive making it difficult to appraise the clinical benefit of these compounds in the different clinical settings where they have been tested (i.e., atrial fibrillation, acute ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, end-stage renal disease, total knee arthroplasty). Moreover, the largest phase 3 randomized trial designed to test the efficacy of asundexian over apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation, the OCEANIC-AF, has been prematurely stopped as a result of the inferior efficacy of asundexian. In this review we discuss the pharmacological properties and available evidence generated thus far for factor XI inhibitors, providing a perspective on the current state of these drugs.

Asundexian versus Apixaban in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Stroke prevention with direct-acting oral anticoagulant agents in patients with atrial fibrillation confers a risk of bleeding and limits their use. Asundexian, an activated factor XI (XIa) inhibitor, is an oral anticoagulant that may prevent strokes with less bleeding.

METHODS

In a phase 3, international, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation in a 1:1 ratio to receive asundexian at a dose of 50 mg once daily or standard-dose apixaban. The primary efficacy objective was to determine whether asundexian is at least noninferior to apixaban for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety objective was to determine whether asundexian is superior to apixaban with respect to major bleeding events.

RESULTS

A total of 14,810 randomly assigned patients were included in the intention-to-treat population. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 73.9±7.7 years, 35.2% were women, 18.6% had chronic kidney disease, 18.2% had a previous stroke or transient ischemic attack, 16.8% had received oral anticoagulants for no more than 6 weeks, and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score (range, 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of stroke) was 4.3±1.3. The trial was stopped prematurely at the recommendation of the independent data monitoring committee. Stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 98 patients (1.3%) assigned to receive asundexian and in 26 (0.4%) assigned to receive apixaban (hazard ratio, 3.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.46 to 5.83). Major bleeding occurred in 17 patients (0.2%) who received asundexian and in 53 (0.7%) who received apixaban (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.55). The incidence of any adverse event appeared to be similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke, treatment with asundexian at a dose of 50 mg once daily was associated with a higher incidence of stroke or systemic embolism than treatment with apixaban in the period before the trial was stopped prematurely. There were fewer major bleeding events with asundexian than with apixaban during this time. (Funded by Bayer; OCEANIC-AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05643573; EudraCT number, 2022-000758-28.).

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of asundexian in healthy Chinese and Japanese volunteers, and comparison with Caucasian data

There is an unmet clinical need for effective anticoagulant therapies for the management of thromboembolic diseases that are not associated with a relevant risk of bleeding. Asundexian (BAY 2433334) is an oral, direct, small-molecule inhibitor of activated factor XI (FXIa). Phase I data from healthy Caucasian male participants indicated predictable pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles and no clinically relevant bleeding-related adverse events (AEs). Reported here are data from two phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple-dose escalation studies of asundexian conducted in 60 healthy men: 24 Japanese and 36 Chinese. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the treatment groups. All treatment-emergent AEs were mild, with no serious AEs or AEs of special interest reported. Systemic exposure to asundexian increased dose proportionally after single or multiple dosing, with relatively low accumulation following multiple once-daily dosing in both Chinese and Japanese volunteers. Asundexian induced dose-dependent prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time and inhibition of FXIa activity, with no effects on prothrombin time or FXI concentration in Japanese participants. There were no clinically relevant interethnic differences in PK profile across the Japanese, Chinese, and Caucasian (data from the previous phase I study) participants and no clinically relevant difference in PD response between Japanese and Caucasian participants.

Factor XIa inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for atherothrombosis

When selecting an anticoagulant, clinicians consider individual patient characteristic, the treatment indication, drug pharmacology, and safety and efficacy as demonstrated in randomized trials. An ideal anticoagulant prevents thrombosis with little or no increase in bleeding. Direct oral anticoagulants represent a major advance over traditional anticoagulants (e.g., unfractionated heparin, warfarin) but still cause bleeding, particularly from the gastrointestinal tract which can limit their use. Epidemiological studies indicate that patients with congenital factor XI (FXI) deficiency have a lower risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and ischemic stroke (IS) than non-deficient individuals, and do not have an increased risk of spontaneous bleeding, even with severe deficiency. These observations provide the rationale for targeting FXI as a new class of anticoagulant. Multiple FXI inhibitors have been introduced and several are being evaluated in Phase III trials. In this review, we explain why drugs that target FXI may be associated with a lower risk of bleeding than currently available anticoagulants and summarize the completed and ongoing trials.

Pharmacological and clinical appraisal of factor XI inhibitor drugs

The evolution of anticoagulation therapy, from vitamin K antagonists to the advent of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) almost two decades ago, marks significant progress. Despite improved safety demonstrated in pivotal trials and post-marketing observations, persistent concerns exist, particularly regarding bleeding risk and the absence of therapeutic indications in specific subgroups or clinical contexts. Factor XI (FXI) has recently emerged as a pivotal contributor to intraluminal thrombus formation and growth, playing a limited role in sealing vessel wall injuries. Inhibiting FXI presents an opportunity to decouple thrombosis from haemostasis, addressing concerns related to bleeding events while safeguarding against thromboembolic events. Notably, FXI inhibition holds promise for patients with end-stage renal disease or cancer, where clear indications for DOACs are currently lacking. Various compounds have undergone design, testing, and progression to phase 2 clinical trials, demonstrating a generally favourable safety and tolerability profile. However, validation through large-scale phase 3 trials with sufficient power to assess both safety and efficacy outcomes is needed. This review comprehensively examines FXI inhibitors, delving into individual classes, exploring their pharmacological properties, evaluating the latest evidence from randomized trials, and offering insights into future perspectives.

Factor XI: structure, function and therapeutic inhibition

Arterial and venous thromboembolism is a major medical concern that requires therapeutic anticoagulation in various medical fields to prevent its drastic consequences. Despite significant advances in anticoagulant therapy, thrombosis remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Traditional anticoagulants like heparin and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have shown efficacy in preventing and treating thrombosis but come with an inherent risk of bleeding due to their non-specific inhibition of multiple coagulation factors. Subsequent direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), targeting specific factors such as Xa or thrombin, demonstrated improved safety profiles compared to VKAs, yet bleeding remains a concern. Accordingly, research is focused on developing anticoagulants with improved safety profiles. A safer class of anticoagulants would have broad appeal. The intrinsic pathway of coagulation, involving factor XI (FXI), has attracted attention as a potential target for safer anticoagulants. Preclinical studies and epidemiological data indicate that FXI deficiency or inhibition protects against thrombosis with minimal bleeding. Current research involves evaluating various FXI-directed strategies, and phase 2 studies have shown promising results in orthopedic surgery, atrial fibrillation, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. Several agents, such as antisense oligonucleotides, monoclonal antibodies, small synthetic molecules, natural peptides, and aptamers, have been developed to inhibit FXI at different stages, offering potentially safer alternatives to traditional anticoagulants. However, the optimal balance between preventing thrombosis and the risk of bleeding associated with FXI inhibitors requires validation through extensive phase 3 clinical trials using definite clinical endpoints. Several of such trials are currently underway or planned to define the role of FXI inhibitors in clinical practice and determine the most suitable FXI inhibitor for each specific indication. The current review highlights the rationale behind developing FXI inhibitors, presenting the most advanced agents in development, summarizing completed clinical trials, and discussing ongoing research efforts.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of frunexian in healthy Chinese volunteer adults: A randomized dose-escalation phase I study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of frunexian (formerly known as EP-7041 and HSK36273) injection, a small molecule inhibitor of activated coagulation factor XI (FXIa), in healthy Chinese adult volunteers. This study was a randomized, placebo- and positive-controlled, sequential, ascending-dose (0.3/0.6/1.0/1.5/2.25 mg/kg/h) study of 5-day continuous intravenous infusions of frunexian. Frunexian administration exhibited an acceptable safety profile with no bleeding events. Steady state was rapidly reached with a median time ranging from 1.02 to 1.50 h. The mean half-life ranged from 1.15 to 1.43 h. Frunexian plasma concentration at a steady state and area under the concentration-time curve exhibited dose-proportional increases. The dose-escalation study of frunexian demonstrated its progressively enhanced capacities to prolong activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and inhibit FXIa activity. The correlations between PK and PD biomarkers (aPTT/baseline and FXI clotting activity/baseline) were described by the two Emax models, with the EC50 values of 8940 and 1300 ng/mL, respectively. Frunexian exhibits good safety and PK/PD properties, suggesting it is a promising candidate for anticoagulant drug.

No Influence of Asundexian on Cardiac Repolarization

Inhibition of activated factor XI reduces thrombogenesis while maintaining physiological hemostasis, with the expectation of reduced bleeding risk compared with standard of care in the clinical setting. Asundexian (BAY 2433334), an activated factor XI inhibitor, is in clinical development for the prevention of thromboembolic events. The effect of asundexian and its plasma metabolite M10 on cardiac repolarization and potential interactions with the hNav1.5 sodium, hCav1.2 calcium, and human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG) potassium channels was investigated in vitro. Additionally, asundexian effects on cardiac parameters and electrocardiogram were examined in telemetered beagle dogs. A randomized, placebo-controlled, 4-way crossover, thorough QT study in healthy adults evaluated the influence of 50 and 150 mg of asundexian on the corrected QT interval, including 400 mg of moxifloxacin as positive control. Across all studies, asundexian and M10 were not associated with any effects on cardiac repolarization. The largest in vitro effects of asundexian (approximately 20% inhibition) were seen for hCav1.2 and hERG. Throughout the thorough QT study, the upper limits of the one-sided 95% confidence interval of placebo-corrected mean changes from baseline in Fridericia corrected QT for 50 and 150 mg of asundexian were below Δ = 10 milliseconds. Asundexian demonstrated favorable safety and tolerability profiles.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of 6-chloro-quinolin-2-one derivatives as novel FXIa inhibitors

A series of 6-chloro-quinolin-2-one derivatives were designed and synthesized as FXIa inhibitors by exploration of P1, P1 prime and P2 prime groups. Each compound was accessed for inhibitory effect on FXIa and some of them were evaluated in the clotting assay. 14c demonstrated excellent in-vitro potency (FXIa IC50: 15 nM, 2 x aPTT: 6.8 μM) and good in-vivo efficacy (prolonged in-vivo aPTT by more than 1-fold but not PT). Moreover, the pharmacokinetics property of 14c were evaluated following intravenous administration in rats, which indicated that 14c probably will be a clinical candidate for intravenous administration.

Effect of factor XI inhibition on tumor cell-induced coagulation activation

BACKGROUND

Cancer-associated thrombosis is a frequent complication in patients with malignancies. While factor XI (FXI)/FXIa inhibition is efficacious in preventing postoperative venous thromboembolism, its role in tumor cell-induced coagulation is less defined.

OBJECTIVES

We thus aimed to provide mechanistic insights into FXI/FXIa inhibition in tumor cell-induced coagulation activation.

METHODS

Procoagulant activity (PCA) of 4 different tissue factor (TF) expressing tumor cell lines was analyzed by single-stage clotting and thrombin generation assay in the presence of a FXIa inhibitor, BMS-262084 (BMS), an inhibitory FXI antibody (anti-FXI), or peak and trough concentrations of rivaroxaban or tinzaparin. Further, tumor cell-induced platelet aggregation was recorded. Recombinant human TF served as positive control.

RESULTS

Although BMS and anti-FXI potently inhibited FXIa amidolytic activity, both inhibitors efficiently mitigated recombinant human TF- and tumor cell-induced fibrin clot formation and platelet aggregation only in the presence of low TF PCA. The anticoagulant effects showed an inverse correlation with the magnitude of cellular TF PCA expression. Similarly, BMS markedly interfered with tumor cell-induced thrombin generation, with the most prominent effects on peak and total thrombin. In addition, anticoagulant effects of FXIa inhibition by 10 μM BMS were in a similar range to those obtained by 600 nM rivaroxaban and 1.6 μM tinzaparin at low TF PCA levels. However, rivaroxaban and tinzaparin also exerted marked anticoagulant activity at high TF PCA levels.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that FXI/FXIa inhibition interferes with tumor cell-induced coagulation activation only at low TF PCA expression levels, a finding with potential implications for future in vivo studies.

Pharmacokinetics of asundexian with combined CYP3A and P-gp inhibitors and an inducer: Target in vitro and in vivo studies

AIMS

Asundexian is an oral, direct and reversible inhibitor of activated factor XI (FXIa) in development for the treatment of thromboembolic events. This article summarizes results from preclinical and clinical studies, including identification of enzymes involved in asundexian pharmacokinetics, and evaluation of potential target drug-drug interactions.

METHODS

In vitro studies investigated the substrate characteristics of asundexian towards several cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms, hydrolytic enzymes and drug transporters. Inhibition of the amide hydrolysis of asundexian was investigated in vitro for several relevant drugs. Phase 1 studies in healthy male participants investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of asundexian upon co-administration of combined inhibitors or an inducer of P-gp and CYP3A4 (itraconazole, verapamil or carbamazepine, respectively, or the moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor fluconazole). The pharmacodynamic (PD) markers are activated partial thromboplastin time and FXIa inhibition.

RESULTS

Asundexian was predominantly metabolized via carboxylesterase 1 and, to a lesser extent, via CYP3A4 and is a substrate of P-gp. The asundexian area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increased by 103% and 75.6% upon combined inhibition of P-gp and strong or moderate inhibition of CYP3A4, respectively, but was unaffected by moderate CYP3A4 inhibition. Combined P-gp and CYP3A4 induction by carbamazepine decreased asundexian AUC by 44.4%. PD is concentration-dependent, thus no differences in maximum responses and recovery commensurate with PK effect(s) were observed. Adverse events were mild and asundexian was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented studies confirmed that CYP3A4 and P-gp contribute to asundexian metabolism and excretion. Observed effects were in line with data from a previous mass balance study.

Factor XI Inhibitors: Potential Role in End-Stage Kidney Disease

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) experience a high thrombotic risk but are also at increased risk of bleeding. There is an unmet need for safer antithrombotic therapy in patients with ESKD on hemodialysis. Factor XI (FXI) represents an attractive therapeutic target for anticoagulation because of the potential to mitigate the bleeding risks associated with currently approved anticoagulants, especially in patients at high risk of bleeding. FXI inhibition is also an attractive option in settings where coagulation is activated by exposure of the blood to artificial surfaces, including the extracorporeal circuit during hemodialysis. Therapies targeting FXI that are in the most advanced stages of clinical development include antisense oligonucleotides, monoclonal antibodies, and synthetic small molecules, which serve either to lower FXI levels or block its physiological effects. This review article presents the most recent pharmacological data with FXI inhibitors, briefly describes phase 2 and 3 clinical trials with these agents, and critically examines the potential future use of FXI inhibitors for extracorporeal circuit anticoagulation in patients with ESKD. In addition, laboratory monitoring and reversal of FXI inhibitors are briefly discussed.

Design and Preclinical Characterization Program toward Asundexian (BAY 2433334), an Oral Factor XIa Inhibitor for the Prevention and Treatment of Thromboembolic Disorders

Activated coagulation factor XI (FXIa) is a highly attractive antithrombotic target as it contributes to the development and progression of thrombosis but is thought to play only a minor role in hemostasis so that its inhibition may allow for decoupling of antithrombotic efficacy and bleeding time prolongation. Herein, we report our major efforts to identify an orally bioavailable, reversible FXIa inhibitor. Using a protein structure-based de novo design approach, we identified a novel micromolar hit with attractive physicochemical properties. During lead modification, a critical problem was balancing potency and absorption by focusing on the most important interactions of the lead series with FXIa while simultaneously seeking to improve metabolic stability and the cytochrome P450 interaction profile. In clinical trials, the resulting compound from our extensive research program, asundexian (BAY 2433334), proved to possess the desired DMPK properties for once-daily oral dosing, and even more importantly, the initial pharmacological hypothesis was confirmed.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Major Orthopedic Surgeries and Factor XIa Inhibitors

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), poses a significant risk during and after hospitalization, particularly for surgical patients. Among various patient groups, those undergoing major orthopedic surgeries are considered to have a higher susceptibility to PE and DVT. Major lower-extremity orthopedic procedures carry a higher risk of symptomatic VTE compared to most other surgeries, with an estimated incidence of ~4%. The greatest risk period occurs within the first 7-14 days following surgery. Major bleeding is also more prevalent in these surgeries compared to others, with rates estimated between 2% and 4%. For patients undergoing major lower-extremity orthopedic surgery who have a low bleeding risk, it is recommended to use pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with or without mechanical devices. The choice of the initial agent depends on the specific surgery and patient comorbidities. First-line options include low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), direct oral anticoagulants, and aspirin. Second-line options consist of unfractionated heparin (UFH), fondaparinux, and warfarin. For most patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty, the initial agents recommended for the early perioperative period are LMWHs (enoxaparin or dalteparin) or direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban or apixaban). In the case of hip fracture surgery, LMWH is recommended as the preferred agent for the entire duration of prophylaxis. However, emerging factor XI(a) inhibitors, as revealed by a recent meta-analysis, have shown a substantial decrease in the occurrence of VTE and bleeding events among patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. This discovery poses a challenge to the existing paradigm of anticoagulant therapy in this specific patient population and indicates that factor XI(a) inhibitors hold great promise as a potential strategy to be taken into serious consideration.

Asundexian: an oral small molecule factor XIa inhibitor for the treatment of thrombotic disorders

Oral anticoagulants, including warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants, are the standard of care for thrombosis prevention and treatment; however, concerns of bleeding often dictate treatment decisions. Inhibition of the intrinsic coagulation system via factor XIa may allow for selective inhibition of the coagulation cascade without significantly impacting hemostasis after injury. Asundexian is an oral small molecule factor XIa inhibitor that, via this novel mechanism, may prove to be a safe and effective option compared with available anticoagulants. Early clinical data for asundexian was promising as a safer alternative to current therapies and prompted further analysis in certain patient populations at increased thrombotic risk. Currently, studies are ongoing to evaluate the safety and efficacy in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and in patients following an acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack.

Determination of the Potential Clinical Benefits of Small Molecule Factor XIa Inhibitors in Arterial Thrombosis

Anticoagulants are the mainstay for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis. However, bleeding complications remain a primary concern. Recent advances in understanding the contribution of activated factor XI (FXIa) in arterial thrombosis with a limited impact on hemostasis have led to the development of several FXIa-targeting modalities. Injectable agents including monoclonal antibodies and antisense oligonucleotides against FXIa have been primarily studied in venous thrombosis. The orally active small molecules that specifically inhibit the active site of FXIa are currently being investigated for their antithrombotic activity in both arteries and veins. This review focuses on a discussion of the potential clinical benefits of small molecule FXIa inhibitors, mainly asundexian and milvexian, in arterial thrombosis based on their pharmacological profiles and the compelling results of phase 2 clinical studies. The preclinical and epidemiological basis for the impact of FXIa in hemostasis and arterial thrombosis is also addressed. In recent clinical study results, asundexian appears to reduce ischemic events in patients with myocardial infarction and minor-to-moderate stroke, whereas milvexian possibly provides benefits in patients with minor stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA). In addition, asundexian and milvexian had a minor impact on hemostasis even in combination with dual-antiplatelet therapy. Other orally active FXIa inhibitors also produce antithrombotic activity in vivo with low bleeding risk. Therefore, FXIa inhibitors might represent a new class of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the treatment of thrombosis, although the explicit clinical positions of asundexian and milvexian in patients with ischemic stroke, high-risk TIA, and coronary artery disease require confirmation from the outcomes of ongoing phase 3 trials.

Metabolism and Disposition of the Novel Oral Factor XIa Inhibitor Asundexian in Rats and in Humans

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Current anticoagulants pose an increased risk of bleeding. The development of drugs targeting factor XIa, like asundexian, may provide a safer treatment option. A human mass‑balance study was conducted to gain a deeper understanding of the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and potential for drug-drug interaction of asundexian. Additionally, an overview of the biotransformation and clearance pathways for asundexian in humans and bile-duct cannulated (BDC) rats in vivo, as well as in vitro in hepatocytes of both species, is reported.

METHODS

The mass balance, biotransformation, and excretion pathways of asundexian were investigated in six healthy volunteers (single oral dose of 25 mg [¹⁴C]asundexian) and in BDC rats (intravenous [¹⁴C]asundexian 1 mg/kg).

RESULTS

Overall recovery of radioactivity was 101% for humans (samples collected up to 14 days after dosing), and 97.9% for BDC rats (samples collected in the 24 h after dosing). Radioactivity was mainly excreted into feces in humans (80.3%) and into bile/feces in BDC rats (> 94%). The predominant clearance pathways in humans were amide hydrolysis to metabolite M1 (47%) and non-labeled M9 with subsequent N-acetylation to M10; oxidative biotransformation was a minor pathway (13%). In rats, hydrolysis of the terminal amide to M2 was the predominant pathway. In human plasma, asundexian accounted for 61.0% of total drug-related area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC); M10 was the major metabolite (16.4% of the total drug-related AUC). Excretion of unmetabolized drug was a significant clearance pathway in both species (human, ~ 37%; BDC rat, ~ 24%). The near-complete bioavailability of asundexian suggests negligible limitations on absorption and first-pass metabolism. Comparison with radiochromatograms from incubations with human or rat hepatocytes indicated consistency across species and a good overall in vitro/in vivo correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to preclinical experiments, total asundexian-derived radioactivity is cleared quantitatively predominantly via feces. Excretion occurs mainly via amide hydrolysis and as the unchanged drug.

The Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of SHR2285, an Oral Small Molecule Factor XIa Inhibitor, in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

There is an unmet need for a safer anticoagulant since bleeding remains a concern with currently approved anticoagulants. Coagulation factor XI (FXI) is an attractive anticoagulant drug target with limited a role in physiological hemostasis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of SHR2285, a novel small molecule FXIa inhibitor, in healthy Chinese volunteers.

METHODS

The study consisted of single ascending doses part (part 1: 25-600 mg) and multiple ascending doses part (part 2: 100, 200, 300, and 400 mg). In both parts, subjects were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive SHR2285 or placebo orally. Blood, urine and feces samples were collected to describe its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile.

RESULTS

In total, 103 healthy volunteers completed the study. SHR2285 was well tolerated. SHR2285 was absorbed rapidly with median time to maximum plasma concentration (T_max) of 1.50 to 3.00 h. The geometric median half-life (t_1/2) of SHR2285 varied from 8.74 to 12.1 h across 25-600 mg single dose. Total systemic exposure of metabolite SHR164471 was approximately 1.77- to 3.61-fold that of the parent drug. The plasma concentration of SHR2285 and SHR164471 reached steady state by the morning of Day 7, with low accumulation ratio (0.956-1.20 and 1.18-1.56, respectively). The increase in pharmacokinetic exposure of SHR2285 and SHR164471 was less than dose proportional. Food has minimal effect on the pharmacokinetics of SHR2285 and SHR164471. SHR2285 produced an exposure-dependent prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and a decrease in FXI activity. The maximum FXI activity inhibition rate (geometric mean) at steady state was 73.27%, 85.58%, 87.77% and 86.27% for 100-400 mg, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SHR2285 was generally safe and well tolerated in healthy subjects across a wide range of doses. SHR2285 exhibited a predictable pharmacokinetic profile and an exposure-related pharmacodynamic profile.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov Identifier NCT04472819; registered on July 15, 2020.

Potential anticoagulant of traditional chinese medicine and novel targets for anticoagulant drugs

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulants are the main drugs used for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis. Currently, anticoagulant drugs are primarily multitarget heparin drugs, single-target FXa inhibitors and FIIa inhibitors. In addition, some traditional Chinese drugs also have anticoagulant effects, but they are not the main direction of treatment at present. But the anticoagulant drugs mentioned above, all have a common side effect is bleeding. Many other anticoagulation targets are under investigation. With further exploration of coagulation mechanism, how to further determine new anticoagulant targets and how to make traditional Chinese medicine play anticoagulant role have become a new field of exploration.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to summarize the recent research progress on coagulation mechanisms, new anticoagulant targets and traditional Chinese medicine.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using four electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang database and ClinicalTrials.gov, from the inception of the study to 28 Feb 2023. Key words used in the literature search were "anticoagulation", "anticoagulant targets", "new targets", "coagulation mechanisms", "potential anticoagulant", "herb medicine", "botanical medicine", "Chinese medicine", "traditional Chinese medicine", "blood coagulation factor", keywords are linked with AND/OR. Recent findings on coagulation mechanisms, potential anticoagulant targets and traditional Chinese medicine were studied.

RESULTS

The active components extracted from the Chinese medicinal herbs, Salvia miltiorrhiza, Chuanxiong rhizoma, safflower and Panax notoginseng have obvious anticoagulant effects and can be used as potential anticoagulant drugs, but the risk of bleeding is unclear. TF/FVIIa, FVIII, FIX, FXI, FXII, and FXIII have all been evaluated as targets in animal studies or clinical trials. FIX and FXI are the most studied anticoagulant targets, but FXI inhibitors have shown stronger advantages.

CONCLUSION

This review of potential anticoagulants provides a comprehensive resource. Literature analysis suggests that FXI inhibitors can be used as potential anticoagulant candidates. In addition, we should not ignore the anticoagulant effect of traditional Chinese medicine, and look forward to more research and the emergence of new drugs.

Factor XIa Inhibitors in Anticoagulation Therapy: Recent Advances and Perspectives

Factor XIa (FXIa) in the intrinsic pathway of the coagulation process has been proven to be an effective and safe target for anticoagulant discovery with limited or no bleeding. Numerous small-molecule FXIa inhibitors (SMFIs) with various scaffolds have been identified in the early stages of drug discovery. They have served as the foundation for the recent discovery of additional promising SMFIs with improved potency, selectivity, and pharmacokinetic profiles, some of which have entered clinical trials for the treatment of thrombosis. After reviewing the coagulation process and structure of FXIa, this perspective discusses the rational or structure-based design, discovery, structure-activity relationships, and development of SMFIs disclosed in recent years. Strategies for identifying more selective and druggable SMFIs are provided, paving the way for the design and discovery of more useful SMFIs for anticoagulation therapy.

A review of emerging factor XI inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Whilst the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has improved the prevention of thromboembolic events, there is still a need for safer anticoagulants. This is particularly so, for specific populations of patients, such as those with an increased bleeding risk or those with severely reduced kidney function. People with Factor XI (FXI) deficiency are at reduced risk of thromboembolic events, without an increased risk of spontaneous bleeding. FXI inhibition, therefore, presents the ideal target for novel anticoagulants.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we provide an overview of the currently available anticoagulants and the emerging FXIa inhibitors in clinical trials. The need for availability of novel anticoagulants and the potential issues that will hinder the development and marketing of factor XIa inhibitors is also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Evidence suggests that FXI inhibition presents a promising drug target for novel anticoagulation therapies. The FXIa inhibitors in development have advantages over DOACs with lower renal clearance and long half-lives. Overall, FXI inhibition presents a promising target, it is likely that the clinical use of FXIa inhibitors is on the horizon.

Pharmacology and Clinical Development of Factor XI Inhibitors

Therapeutic anticoagulation is indicated for a variety of circumstances and conditions in several fields of medicine to prevent or treat venous and arterial thromboembolism. According to the different mechanisms of action, the available parenteral and oral anticoagulant drugs share the common principle of hampering or blocking key steps of the coagulation cascade, which unavoidably comes at the price of an increased propensity to bleed. Hemorrhagic complications affect patient prognosis both directly and indirectly (ie, by preventing the adoption of an effective antithrombotic strategy). Inhibition of factor XI (FXI) has emerged as a strategy with the potential to uncouple the pharmacological effect and the adverse events of anticoagulant therapy. This observation is based on the differential contribution of FXI to thrombus amplification, in which it plays a major role, and hemostasis, in which it plays an ancillary role in final clot consolidation. Several agents were developed to inhibit FXI at different stages (ie, suppressing biosynthesis, preventing zymogen activation, or impeding the biological action of the active form), including antisense oligonucleotides, monoclonal antibodies, small synthetic molecules, natural peptides, and aptamers. Phase 2 studies of different classes of FXI inhibitors in orthopedic surgery suggested that dose-dependent reductions in thrombotic complications are not paralleled by dose-dependent increases in bleeding compared with low-molecular-weight heparin. Likewise, the FXI inhibitor asundexian was associated with lower rates of bleeding compared with the activated factor X inhibitor apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation, although no evidence of a therapeutic effect on stroke prevention is available so far. FXI inhibition could also be appealing for patients with other conditions, including end-stage renal disease, noncardioembolic stroke, or acute myocardial infarction, for which other phase 2 studies have been conducted. The balance between thromboprophylaxis and bleeding achieved by FXI inhibitors needs confirmation in large-scale phase 3 clinical trials powered for clinical end points. Several of such trials are ongoing or planned to define the role of FXI inhibitors in clinical practice and to clarify which FXI inhibitor may be most suited for each clinical indication. This article reviews the rationale, pharmacology, results of medium or small phase 2 studies, and future perspectives of drugs inhibiting FXI.

Application of Nanotechnology in Thrombus Therapy

A thrombus is a blood clot that forms in the lumen of an artery or vein, restricting blood flow and causing clinical symptoms. Thrombosis is associated with many life-threatening cardiovascular diseases. However, current clinical therapeutic technologies still have many problems in targeting, enrichment, penetration, and safety to meet the thrombosis treatment needs. Therefore, researchers devote themselves to developing nanosystems loaded with antithrombotic drugs to address this paradox in recent years. Herein, the existing thrombosis treatment technologies are first reviewed; and then, their advantages and disadvantages are outlined based on a brief discussion of thrombosis's definition and formation mechanism. Furthermore, the need and application cases for introducing nanotechnology are discussed, focusing on thrombus-specific targeted ligand modification technology and microenvironment-triggered responsive drug release technology. Then, nanomaterials that can be used to design antithrombotic nanotherapeutic systems are summarized. Moreover, a variety of drug delivery technologies driven by nanomotors in thrombosis therapy is also introduced. Last of all, a prospective discussion on the future development of nanotechnology for thrombosis therapy is highlighted.

A Review of FXIa Inhibition as a Novel Target for Anticoagulation

Limitations of vitamin K antagonists as chronic oral anticoagulant therapy have largely been supplanted by direct factor IIa and factor Xa inhibitor oral anticoagulants with similar efficacy but an overall better safety profile, lack of routine monitoring, and very limited drug-drug interactions compared with agents such as warfarin. However, an increased risk of bleeding remains even with these new-generation oral anticoagulants in fragile patient populations, in patients requiring dual or triple antithrombotic therapy, or high bleed risk surgeries. Epidemiologic data in patients with hereditary factor XI deficiency and preclinical studies support the notion that factor XIa inhibitors have the ability to be an effective but potentially safer alternative to existing anticoagulants, based on their ability to prevent thrombosis directly within the intrinsic pathway without affecting hemostatic mechanisms. As such, various types of factor XIa inhibitors have been studied in early phase clinical studies, including inhibitors of the biosynthesis of factor XIa with antisense oligonucleotides or direct inhibitors of factor XIa using small peptidomimetic molecules, monoclonal antibodies, aptamers, or natural inhibitors. In this review, we discuss how different types of factor XIa inhibitors work and present findings from recently published Phase II clinical trials across multiple indications, including stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, dual pathway inhibition with concurrent antiplatelets post-myocardial infarction, and thromboprophylaxis of orthopaedic surgery patients. Finally, we refer to ongoing Phase III clinical trials of factor XIa inhibitors and their potential to provide definitive answers regarding their safety and efficacy in preventing thromboembolic events in specific patient groups.

Effects of Tablet Formulation, Food, or Gastric pH on the Bioavailability of Asundexian

Absolute bioavailability (F) and the impact of gastric pH, tablet formulation, and food on the pharmacokinetics and safety of asundexian, an oral factor XIa inhibitor, was assessed in healthy White men aged 18-45 years in 4 studies. For F, fasted participants received 50 μg of [¹³ C₇ ,¹⁵ N]-labeled asundexian intravenously 2 hours after 25 mg of asundexian orally. Tablet formulation (50-mg immediate release [IR], and different amorphous solid dispersion [ASD] IR 25-mg and 50-mg ASD IR tablets) and food effects were explored in 2 studies. Formulation was compared using 50-mg IR versus 25-mg ASD IR and 25-mg ASD IR versus 50-mg ASD IR (fasted); food effect using 25-mg ASD IR and 50-mg ASD IR. Gastric pH modulation was assessed using omeprazole or antacid coadministration with asundexian in the fasted state. Pharmacokinetic parameters included area under the concentration-time curve (AUC; and AUC/dose [D]) and maximum observed concentration (C_max and C_max /D) data were evaluable for 59 participants. F was 103.9%. Relative bioavailability with 25-mg ASD IR and 50-mg ASD IR tablets, respectively, was marginally affected by formulation (AUC/D ratios, 94.3% and 95.1%; C_max /D ratios, 95.5% and 88.7%), food (AUC[/D] ratios, 91.1% and 96.9%; C_max [/D] ratios: 78.3% and 95.1%), and gastric pH (omeprazole, no effect; antacid, AUC ratio, 89.9% and C_max ratio, 83.7%). No serious adverse events or deaths occurred; most adverse events were mild or moderate. In summary, oral asundexian was well tolerated and demonstrated complete bioavailability irrespective of tablet formulation, food, or gastric pH.

Factor XI inhibitors: cardiovascular perspectives

Anticoagulants are the cornerstone for prevention and treatment of thrombosis but are not completely effective, and concerns about the risk of bleeding continue to limit their uptake. Animal studies and experience from patients with genetic coagulation factor XI deficiency suggesting that this factor is more important for thrombosis than for haemostasis raises the potential for drugs that target factor XI to provide safer anticoagulation. Multiple factor XI inhibitors are currently under evaluation in clinical trials, including parenterally administered antisense oligonucleotides, monoclonal antibodies, and orally active small-molecule inhibitors. Promising results of phase 2 trials in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery, and in those with end-stage kidney disease, atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndromes have led to large phase 3 trials that are currently ongoing. We here review premises for the use of these agents, results so far accrued, ongoing studies, and perspectives for future patient care.

Discovery and development of Factor Xa inhibitors (2015-2022)

As a pathological coagulation process, thrombus can lead to many serious diseases, including ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and deep venous thrombosis (DVT). And anticoagulant drugs are one of the most effective ways to prevent and treat these diseases. Although macromolecular anticoagulant drugs such as low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are widely used in the clinic, their characteristics of requiring injectable use hinder their further promotion in the clinic, and the disadvantages of oral anticoagulant drugs, such as warfarin and dabigatran etexilate, which can easily cause bleeding adverse effects, are also not addressed. Factor Xa (FXa) has gained attention because it lies at the intersection of the coagulation cascade pathways, whereas subsequently introduced Factor Xa inhibitors such as rivaroxaban and apixaban, among others, have gained market popularity because of their high potency for anticoagulation and high specificity for Factor Xa when administered orally. But some of the drawbacks that these Factor Xa inhibitors have simultaneously such as fewer indications and the lack of an effective reversal drug when bleeding occurs are urgently addressed. The development of new Factor Xa inhibitors therefore becomes one means of addressing these questions. This article summarizes the small molecule Factor Xainhibitors developed from 2015 to 2022, classifies them according to their scaffolds, focuses on the analysis of their structure-activity relationships, and provides a brief assessment of them.

Bleeding and ischaemic events after first bleed in anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients: risk and timing

AIMS

To determine the risk of subsequent adverse clinical outcomes in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who experienced a new bleeding event.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Anticoagulated AF patients were followed in two prospective cohort studies. Information on incident bleeding was systematically collected during yearly follow-up visits and events were adjudicated as major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis guidelines. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), or all-cause death. Time-updated multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models were used to compare outcomes in patients with and without incident bleeding. Median follow-up was 4.08 years [interquartile range (IQR): 2.93-5.98]. Of the 3277 patients included (mean age 72 years, 28.5% women), 646 (19.7%) developed a new bleeding, 297 (9.1%) a major bleeding and 418 (12.8%) a CRNMB. The incidence of the primary outcome was 7.08 and 4.04 per 100 patient-years in patients with and without any bleeding [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16-1.61; P < 0.001; median time between a new bleeding and a primary outcome 306 days (IQR: 23-832)]. Recurrent bleeding occurred in 126 patients [incidence, 8.65 per 100 patient-years (95% CI: 7.26-10.30)]. In patients with and without a major bleeding, the incidence of the primary outcome was 11.00 and 4.06 per 100 patient-years [aHR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.69-2.46; P < 0.001; median time to a primary outcome 142 days (IQR: 9-518)], and 59 had recurrent bleeding [11.61 per 100 patient-years (95% CI: 8.99-14.98)]. The incidence of the primary outcome was 5.29 and 4.55 in patients with and without CRNMB [aHR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.76-1.15; P = 0.53; median time to a composite outcome 505 days (IQR: 153-1079)], and 87 had recurrent bleeding [8.43 per 100 patient-years (95% CI: 6.83-10.40)]. Patients who had their oral anticoagulation (OAC) discontinued after their first bleeding episode had a higher incidence of the primary composite than those who continued OAC (63/89 vs. 159/557 patients; aHR: 4.46, 95% CI: 3.16-6.31; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In anticoagulated AF patients, major bleeding but not CRNMB was associated with a high risk of adverse outcomes, part of which may be explained by OAC discontinuation. Most events occurred late after the bleeding episode, emphasizing the importance of long-term follow-up in these patients.

The 1,2,3-triazole 'all-in-one' ring system in drug discovery: a good bioisostere, a good pharmacophore, a good linker, and a versatile synthetic tool

INTRODUCTION

The 1,2,3-triazole ring occupies an important space in medicinal chemistry due to its unique structural properties, synthetic versatility and pharmacological potential making it a critical scaffold. Since it is readily available through click chemistry for creating compound collections against various diseases, it has become an emerging area of interest for medicinal chemists.

AREAS COVERED

This review article addresses the unique properties of the1,2,3-triazole nucleus as an intriguing ring system in drug discovery while focusing on the most recent medicinal chemistry strategies exploited for the design and development of 1,2,3-triazole analogs as inhibitors of various biological targets.

EXPERT OPINION

Evidently, the 1,2,3-triazole ring with unique structural features has enormous potential in drug design against various diseases as a pharmacophore, a bioisoster or a structural platform. The most recent evidence indicates that it may be more emerging in drug molecules in near future along with an increasing understanding of its prominent roles in drug structures. The synthetic feasibility and versatility of triazole chemistry make it certainly ideal for creating compound libraries for more constructive structure-activity relationship studies. However, more comparative and target-specific studies are needed to gain a deeper understanding of the roles of the 1,2,3-triazole ring in molecular recognition.[Figure: see text].

A Multicenter, Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Dose-Finding Trial of the Oral Factor XIa Inhibitor Asundexian to Prevent Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes After Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Oral activated factor XI (FXIa) inhibitors may modulate coagulation to prevent thromboembolic events without substantially increasing bleeding. We explored the pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of the oral FXIa inhibitor asundexian for secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS

We randomized 1601 patients with recent acute MI to oral asundexian 10, 20, or 50 mg or placebo once daily for 6 to 12 months in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2, dose-ranging trial. Patients were randomized within 5 days of their qualifying MI and received dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor. The effect of asundexian on FXIa inhibition was assessed at 4 weeks. The prespecified main safety outcome was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding comparing all pooled asundexian doses with placebo. The prespecified efficacy outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, or stent thrombosis comparing pooled asundexian 20 and 50 mg doses with placebo.

RESULTS

The median age was 68 years, 23% of participants were women, 51% had ST-segment-elevation MI, 80% were treated with aspirin plus ticagrelor or prasugrel, and 99% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention before randomization. Asundexian caused dose-related inhibition of FXIa activity, with 50 mg resulting in >90% inhibition. Over a median follow-up of 368 days, the main safety outcome occurred in 30 (7.6%), 32 (8.1%), 42 (10.5%), and 36 (9.0%) patients receiving asundexian 10 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg, or placebo, respectively (pooled asundexian versus placebo: hazard ratio, 0.98 [90% CI, 0.71-1.35]). The efficacy outcome occurred in 27 (6.8%), 24 (6.0%), 22 (5.5%), and 22 (5.5%) patients assigned asundexian 10 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg, or placebo, respectively (pooled asundexian 20 and 50 mg versus placebo: hazard ratio, 1.05 [90% CI, 0.69-1.61]).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with recent acute MI, 3 doses of asundexian, when added to aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor, resulted in dose-dependent, near-complete inhibition of FXIa activity without a significant increase in bleeding and a low rate of ischemic events. These data support the investigation of asundexian at a dose of 50 mg daily in an adequately powered clinical trial of patients who experienced acute MI.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT04304534; URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search; Unique identifier: 2019-003244-79.

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Milvexian in Participants with Normal Renal Function and Participants with Moderate or Severe Renal Impairment

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of moderate or severe renal impairment on the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of milvexian.

METHODS

This open-label, parallel-group study assessed the PK, safety, and tolerability of a single oral 60 mg dose of milvexian in participants with normal renal function (n = 8; estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2) and participants with moderate (n = 8; eGFR ≥ 30 to ≤ 59 mL/min/1.73 m2) or severe (n = 8; eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) renal impairment. Regression analysis was performed using linear regression of log-transformed PK parameters versus eGFR.

RESULTS

Milvexian was well tolerated, with no deaths, serious adverse events, or serious bleeding reported. The maximum milvexian concentration (Cmax) was similar for all groups. Based on a regression analysis of milvexian concentration versus eGFR, participants with eGFR values of 30 and 15 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, had area under the curve (AUC) values that were 41% and 54% greater than in participants with normal renal function. Median time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was similar for the three groups (4.5-5.0 h). The half-life increased for participants with moderate (18.0 h) or severe (17.7 h) renal impairment compared with those with normal renal function (13.8 h).

CONCLUSION

A single dose of milvexian 60 mg was safe and well tolerated in participants with normal renal function and moderate or severe renal impairment. There was a similar increase in milvexian exposure between the moderate and severe renal groups.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03196206, first posted 22 June 2017).

Effects of Itraconazole and Diltiazem on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Milvexian, A Factor XIa Inhibitor

INTRODUCTION

Modulation of Factor XIa (FXIa) may provide a novel mechanism for systemic anticoagulation with the potential to improve the risk-benefit profile observed with existing anticoagulants through greater efficacy or a safer bleeding profile. This study assessed the effects of co-administration with strong and moderate CYP3A inhibitors itraconazole and diltiazem, respectively, on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of milvexian, a Factor XIa inhibitor.

METHODS

This was an open-label, non-randomized, two-period crossover study in healthy participants. In period 1, participants received a single oral dose of milvexian (30 mg) on day 1, followed by a washout on days 2 and 3. In period 2, participants received multiple oral doses of itraconazole (200 mg) or diltiazem (240 mg) with a single dose of milvexian.

RESULTS

A total of 28 participants entered the treatment period. Following itraconazole co-administration, milvexian exposure was increased; AUC(0-T), AUC(INF), and C24 were 2.5-, 2.5-, and 3.8-fold higher, while mean Cmax was 28% higher versus milvexian alone. Diltiazem co-administration also increased milvexian exposure; AUC(0-T), AUC(INF), and C24 were 38, 38, and 64% higher, and mean Cmax was 9.6% higher versus milvexian alone. Prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time was observed with milvexian in a concentration-dependent fashion irrespective of co-administration with itraconazole or diltiazem. Administration of a single dose of milvexian, alone or in combination with itraconazole or diltiazem, was generally safe and well tolerated; there were no deaths or serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

A moderate increase in milvexian exposure was observed following co-administration of itraconazole while a minimal increase was seen with diltiazem, consistent with the involvement of CYP3A metabolism and P-glycoprotein in drug absorption/elimination. Milvexian was generally safe and well tolerated in healthy participants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02807909; submitted June 17, 2016).

First randomized evaluation of safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of BAY 1831865, an antibody targeting coagulation factor XI and factor XIa, in healthy men

BACKGROUND

Bleeding is a clinically significant issue with all current anticoagulants. Safer antithrombotic strategies are required.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of BAY 1831865, a humanized, factor XI (FXI)-directed monoclonal antibody, after single intravenous (i.v.) or subcutaneous (s.c.) doses in healthy volunteers.

PATIENTS/METHODS

In a first-in-human, phase I study, 70 volunteers were randomly assigned (4:1) to receive single-dose BAY 1831865 (3.5, 7, 17, 35, 75, or 150 mg i.v. or 150 mg s.c.) or placebo. Adverse events, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated.

RESULTS

In this study, no hemorrhage, or hypersensitivity or infusion-/injection-related reactions were reported. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 3 (5.4%) of 56 volunteers; all were mild and self-limited. Dose-dependent prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and inhibition of FXI clotting activity was observed with BAY 1831865 i.v. (geometric mean maximum ratio-to-baseline: aPTT, range, 1.09-3.11 vs. 1.05 with placebo; FXI, range, 0.70-0.04 vs. 0.91 with placebo). Onset of effect was rapid after i.v. administration, with duration of effect (up to 55 days) determined by dose. BAY 1831865 s.c. had similar pharmacodynamic effects but a slower onset of action. Terminal half-life increased continuously with increasing i.v. dose (range, 28-208 h), leading to strong and continuous increases in systemic exposure to BAY 1831865. Absolute bioavailability of BAY 1831865 s.c. was 47.2% (95% confidence interval, 30.2-73.7).

CONCLUSIONS

BAY 1831865 i.v. or s.c. was well tolerated, with no evidence of bleeding in healthy volunteers. BAY 1831865 exhibited pronounced, sustained dose-dependent prolongation of aPTT and duration of FXI inhibition.

Pharmacological profile of asundexian, a novel, orally bioavailable inhibitor of factor XIa

BACKGROUND

Activated coagulation factor XI (FXIa) contributes to the development and propagation of thrombosis but plays only a minor role in hemostasis; therefore, it is an attractive antithrombotic target.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the pharmacology of asundexian (BAY 2433334), a small molecule inhibitor targeting FXIa, in vitro and in various rabbit models.

METHODS

The effects of asundexian on FXIa activity, selectivity versus other proteases, plasma thrombin generation, and clotting assays were evaluated. Antithrombotic effects were determined in FeCl2 - and arterio-venous (AV) shunt models. Asundexian was administered intravenously or orally, before or during thrombus formation, and with or without antiplatelet drugs (aspirin and ticagrelor). Potential effects of asundexian on bleeding were evaluated in ear-, gum-, and liver injury models.

RESULTS

Asundexian inhibited human FXIa with high potency and selectivity. It reduced FXIa activity, thrombin generation triggered by contact activation or low concentrations of tissue factor, and prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time in human, rabbit, and various other species, but not in rodents. In the FeCl2 -injury models, asundexian reduced thrombus weight versus control, and in the arterial model when added to aspirin and ticagrelor. In the AV shunt model, asundexian reduced thrombus weight when administered before or during thrombus formation. Asundexian alone or in combination with antiplatelet drugs did not increase bleeding times or blood loss in any of the models studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Asundexian is a potent oral FXIa inhibitor with antithrombotic efficacy in arterial and venous thrombosis models in prevention and intervention settings, without increasing bleeding.

Factor XI Inhibition for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: An Update on Current Evidence and Future perspectives

During the past decade, emergence of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has drastically improved the prevention of thrombosis. However, several unmet needs prevail in the field of thrombosis prevention, even in the DOACs’ era. The use of DOACs is still constrained and the drugs cannot be administered in every clinical scenario, such as an increased anticoagulant-associated bleeding risk, particularly in some specific populations (cancer – notably those with gastrointestinal or genitourinary cancer – and frail patients), the impossibility to be used in certain patients (eg, end-stage kidney failure during hemodialysis, pregnancy and breastfeeding), and their lack of efficacy in certain clinical scenarios (eg, mechanical heart valves, triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome). Efforts to find a factor that upon antagonization prevents thrombosis but spares haemostasis have resulted in the identification of coagulation factor XI (FXI) as a therapeutic target. After briefly recapitulating the role of factor XI in the balance of haemostasis, we propose a narrative review of the key data published to date with compounds targeting factor XI to prevent thrombosis as well as the main ongoing clinical studies, opening up prospects for improving the care of patients requiring thrombosis prevention.

Safety of the oral factor XIa inhibitor asundexian compared with apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (PACIFIC-AF): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, dose-finding phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting oral anticoagulant use for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation is limited by bleeding concerns. Asundexian, a novel, oral small molecule activated coagulation factor XIa (FXIa) inhibitor, might reduce thrombosis with minimal effect on haemostasis. We aimed to determine the optimal dose of asundexian and to compare the incidence of bleeding with that of apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

In this randomised, double-blind, phase 2 dose-finding study, we compared asundexian 20 mg or 50 mg once daily with apixaban 5 mg twice daily in patients aged 45 years or older with atrial fibrillation, a CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of at least 2 if male or at least 3 if female, and increased bleeding risk. The study was conducted at 93 sites in 14 countries, including 12 European countries, Canada, and Japan. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to a treatment group using an interactive web response system, with randomisation stratified by whether patients were receiving a direct-acting oral anticoagulant before the study start. Masking was achieved using a double-dummy design, with participants receiving both the assigned treatment and a placebo that resembled the non-assigned treatment. The primary endpoint was the composite of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria, assessed in all patients who took at least one dose of study medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04218266, and EudraCT, 2019-002365-35.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 30, 2020, and June 21, 2021, 862 patients were enrolled. 755 patients were randomly assigned to treatment. Two patients (assigned to asundexian 20 mg) never took any study medication, resulting in 753 patients being included in the analysis (249 received asundexian 20 mg, 254 received asundexian 50 g, and 250 received apixaban). The mean age of participants was 73·7 years (SD 8·3), 309 (41%) were women, 216 (29%) had chronic kidney disease, and mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 3·9 (1·3). Asundexian 20 mg resulted in 81% inhibition of FXIa activity at trough concentrations and 90% inhibition at peak concentrations; asundexian 50 mg resulted in 92% inhibition at trough concentrations and 94% inhibition at peak concentrations. Ratios of incidence proportions for the primary endpoint were 0·50 (90% CI 0·14-1·68) for asundexian 20 mg (three events), 0·16 (0·01-0·99) for asundexian 50 mg (one event), and 0·33 (0·09-0·97) for pooled asundexian (four events) versus apixaban (six events). The rate of any adverse event occurring was similar in the three treatment groups: 118 (47%) with asundexian 20 mg, 120 (47%) with asundexian 50 mg, and 122 (49%) with apixaban.

INTERPRETATION

The FXIa inhibitor asundexian at doses of 20 mg and 50 mg once daily resulted in lower rates of bleeding compared with standard dosing of apixaban, with near-complete in-vivo FXIa inhibition, in patients with atrial fibrillation.

FUNDING

Bayer.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of milvexian in healthy Japanese participants

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending-dose study evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of multiple doses of milvexian, an oral small-molecule FXIa inhibitor, in healthy Japanese participants. Participants received oral milvexian daily under fasted (50 mg and 200 mg) or fed conditions (500 mg) or placebo over 14 days; 24 participants (8/cohort: 6 milvexian; 2 placebo) were planned. Due to an unblinding event, participants in one cohort (200 mg daily) were discontinued, and a second cohort enrolled; 32 participants were included in safety and pharmacodynamic analyses, and 24/32 in pharmacokinetic analyses. Milvexian up to 500 mg daily for 14 days was generally well tolerated, with no deaths, serious adverse events, or discontinuations due to adverse events. Milvexian exposure increased between 50-mg and 200-mg doses. Median Tmax was similar with 50-mg and 200-mg doses (2.5-3.0 h) and delayed under fed conditions (500 mg, 7.0-8.0 h). Median T1/2 was similar across doses (8.9-11.9 h). Multiple oral milvexian administrations resulted in concentration-related prolongation of aPTT and decreased FXI clotting activity. Milvexian was generally safe and well tolerated. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of milvexian demonstrates suitability for further clinical development in Japanese participants.

First-In-Human Study to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of SHR2285, a Small-Molecule Factor XIa Inhibitor in Healthy Subjects

Background: Targeting factor XI (FXI) is a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment and prevention of thrombosis without increasing the risk of bleeding. Here, we assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of SHR2285, a novel FXIa inhibitor, in healthy subjects.

Methods: In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-ascending single-dosing trial (NCT03769831), eligible volunteer subjects receive either SHR2285 or placebo in a 3:1 ratio. Subjects assigned to the SHR2285 group received a single oral dose of SHR2285 at 50 mg, which was subsequently escalated to 100 mg, 200 mg, and 400 mg. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics parameters were assessed. All subjects were followed for 6 days.

Results: SHR2285 was well tolerated. All adverse events were grade 1, and there was no evidence of bleeding events. The PK results revealed a rapid onset of action of SHR2285 (median time to maximum plasma concentration [Tmax] in different dose groups ranged 3.0–4.0 h) and the mean half-life ranged from 7.6 to 15.8 h. The metabolite SHR164471 had a slightly longer Tmax than the parent SHR2285, reaching a peak at a median of 6.0–7.0 h, and its mean half-life were 10.1–14.7 h in different dose groups. The sums of the area under the concentration–time curve from zero to time infinity of SHR2285 and SHR164471 in the 200 and 400 mg groups were similar, indicating the sum pharmacological activity of SHR2285 and SHR164471 showed a saturation trend between 200 and 400 mg. PD analysis showed that the inhibition of FXI activity was synchronized with prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time after SHR2285 administration, but the serum prothrombin time and international normalized ratio levels were not affected by SHR2285.

Conclusion: SHR2285 demonstrated favorable safety, PK, and PD profiles in the dose range of 50 mg–400 mg. This first-in-human study supports the further development of SHR2285 for indications requiring anticoagulation.

Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03769831, identifier [NCT03769831].

A proposal for managing bleeding in patients on therapeutic factor XI(a) inhibitors

Several drugs that reduce functional levels of the plasma protease zymogen factor XI (FXI), or that inhibit its activated form (FXIa), are being evaluated as treatments to prevent thrombosis. Based on the observation that individuals with inherited FXI deficiency have a relatively mild bleeding disorder, it is anticipated that therapeutic FXI(a) inhibitors will have a smaller impact on hemostasis than anticoagulants targeting thrombin or factor Xa. However, even if FXI(a) inhibitors are determined to be safer than currently used anticoagulants, some patients on these drugs will experience abnormal bleeding or require emergent surgery. Strategies for dealing with such situations are required. Treatment with antifibrinolytic agents and low doses of recombinant factor VIIa effectively prevent abnormal bleeding in FXI-deficient patients with alloantibody inhibitors to FXI who undergo surgery. We propose that a similar strategy can be used for patients on therapeutic FXI(a) inhibitors who are bleeding or require invasive procedures.

ONO-7684 a novel oral FXIa inhibitor: Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in a first-in-human study

AIMS

The objectives of this study were to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single and multiple oral doses of ONO-7684, a novel activated factor XI (FXIa) inhibitor, in healthy subjects.

METHODS

This was a first-in-human (FIH), randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, single and multiple dose study in healthy subjects under fed and fasted conditions. This study consisted of two parts: single ascending dose (Part A; 1, 5, 20, 80, 150 or 300 mg ONO-7684 or placebo) and multiple ascending doses (Part B; 80, 150 or 250 mg ONO-7684 or placebo daily for 14 days). In both parts, subjects were randomised in a 3:1 ratio to receive ONO-7684 or placebo.

RESULTS

ONO-7684 was well tolerated at all dose levels tested following both single and repeated doses, with a low overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. There was no evidence to suggest a bleeding risk. Dose proportionality in exposure was observed for the range of 1-300 mg ONO-7684 in Part A. In Part A, the half-life of ONO-7684 administered in the fasted state ranged from 16.0 to 19.8 hours. In Part B, the half-life of ONO-7684 administered in the fed state ranged from 22.1 to 27.9 hours, supporting once daily oral dosing. ONO-7684 strongly inhibited factor XI coagulation activity (FXI:C) and increased activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), with a mean maximum on treatment percentage inhibition versus baseline of 92% and a mean maximum on treatment ratio-to-baseline of 2.78, respectively, at 250 mg ONO-7684 daily.

CONCLUSIONS

The data generated in this FIH study demonstrate the promising potential of oral FXIa inhibition and ONO-7684 for indications requiring anticoagulation.